Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #685243 > unrolled thread

What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:54 -0500
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:18 -0700
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:51 -0700
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 12:24 -0700
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-14 20:09 -0700
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 06:09 +1000
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 15:27 -0500
        Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 19:03 -0400
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:32 +1000
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 18:24 -0400
        Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 08:49 +1000
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 20:09 -0400
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 19:26 -0500
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 10:44 +1000
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:30 -0700
        Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:41 +1000
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 19:00 -0500
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 10:12 +1000
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-14 22:53 -0400
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 09:19 -0500
                Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 07:52 +1000
                  Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 12:22 -0500
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 20:13 -0400
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 20:11 -0400
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 10:46 +1000
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 22:09 -0400
                Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 16:00 +1000
                  Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 01:37 -0700
                    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 05:17 -0700
                      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 05:25 -0700
                      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:27 +0000
                    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 09:56 -0400
                      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 15:42 -0700
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 21:20 -0500
                Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:32 +1000
                  Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 12:00 -0500
                    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 07:53 +1000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#685851

On 16/05/2018 12:19 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 7:12 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 10:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2018 6:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>>> threats
>>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>>
>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter
>>>> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With
>>>> less warning, nothing.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Physics Question;
>>>
>>> so, at 20,000 mph, and 20 years away, how large is the asteroid to be
>>> detectable by radar at that distance ?  OR how about by reflected light
>>> ? (assume rock is coming straight towards earth >
>>> part 2.   How much mass to we need to put up there to effect the path of
>>> the rock ?  (assume by gravity, by explosion, or by hitting it like a q
>>> ball)
>>>
>>> part 3. how much time and energy does it take to put the mass up there
>>> to the asteroid from Earth to affect something ?
>>>
>>> (math is not hard, but I think you will see how the Earth is in very
>>> deep yogurt when it comes to asteroids, of most any size, (Bruce Willis
>>> cannot save the planet))
>>>
>>
>> **No doubt about it. Fortunately, the chances of being hit are
>> incredibly remote. Unlike global warming, which is measurable and
>> something we may be able to deal with.
>>
>> BTW: If you want any calculations done, use the accepted scientific
>> units. No one uses Imperial measurements any more.
> 
> Fosters beer comes in p & q's dude.

**No one in Australia drinks Fosters. It's Australia's worst beer. It's 
designed solely for undiscerning foreigners. My Miller Genuine Draft 
comes in 350ml bottles.

> 
> answer the physics question.

**No.


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685945

On 5/16/2018 4:52 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 16/05/2018 12:19 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 7:12 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2018 10:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/14/2018 6:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to
>>>>>>>> policymakers,
>>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>>>> threats
>>>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to
>>>>> alter
>>>>> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With
>>>>> less warning, nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Physics Question;
>>>>
>>>> so, at 20,000 mph, and 20 years away, how large is the asteroid to be
>>>> detectable by radar at that distance ?  OR how about by reflected light
>>>> ? (assume rock is coming straight towards earth >
>>>> part 2.   How much mass to we need to put up there to effect the
>>>> path of
>>>> the rock ?  (assume by gravity, by explosion, or by hitting it like a q
>>>> ball)
>>>>
>>>> part 3. how much time and energy does it take to put the mass up there
>>>> to the asteroid from Earth to affect something ?
>>>>
>>>> (math is not hard, but I think you will see how the Earth is in very
>>>> deep yogurt when it comes to asteroids, of most any size, (Bruce Willis
>>>> cannot save the planet))
>>>>
>>>
>>> **No doubt about it. Fortunately, the chances of being hit are
>>> incredibly remote. Unlike global warming, which is measurable and
>>> something we may be able to deal with.
>>>
>>> BTW: If you want any calculations done, use the accepted scientific
>>> units. No one uses Imperial measurements any more.
>>
>> Fosters beer comes in p & q's dude.
> 
> **No one in Australia drinks Fosters. It's Australia's worst beer. It's
> designed solely for undiscerning foreigners. My Miller Genuine Draft
> comes in 350ml bottles.

Millers is Detroit pee beer.

> 
>>
>> answer the physics question.
> 
> **No.

we all know you cant

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685480

On 5/14/2018 8:00 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 6:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>
>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>
>>
>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter
>> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With
>> less warning, nothing.
>>
> 
> 
> Physics Question;
> 
> so, at 20,000 mph, and 20 years away, how large is the asteroid to be
> detectable by radar at that distance ?  OR how about by reflected light
> ? (assume rock is coming straight towards earth)
> 
> part 2.   How much mass to we need to put up there to effect the path of
> the rock ?  (assume by gravity, by explosion, or by hitting it like a q
> ball)
> 
> part 3. how much time and energy does it take to put the mass up there
> to the asteroid from Earth to affect something ?
> 
> (math is not hard, but I think you will see how the Earth is in very
> deep yogurt when it comes to asteroids, of most any size, (Bruce Willis
> cannot save the planet))
> 
Well, those of us able to handle science and math can see it, but libs 
and Trevor in particular are limited to feelings and hand-waving.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685478

On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>
>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>>> into perspective."
>>>>
>>>
>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Trevor Wilson
>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>
>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an 
>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo, 
>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>
> 
> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter 
> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With 
> less warning, nothing.
> 
Hey, Mr. "scientist" you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem 
of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685484

On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing 
>>>>> the
>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both 
>>>>> threats
>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the 
>>>> planet.
>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>
>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an 
>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo, 
>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>
>>
>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to 
>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. 
>> With less warning, nothing.
>>
> Hey, Mr. "scientist"

**I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a 
whole lot more about science than you do.


  you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem

**And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio still 
can't use the international scientific units of measurements.

> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?

**Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685496

On 5/14/2018 8:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been 
>>>>>> much
>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in 
>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is 
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative 
>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both 
>>>>>> threats
>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the 
>>>>> planet.
>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>
>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an 
>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo, 
>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>
>>>
>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to 
>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. 
>>> With less warning, nothing.
>>>
>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
> 
> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a 
> whole lot more about science than you do.

Ignorant journaist-strategic writer! Stick to spelling and grammar.

>   you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem

This is so trivial if you weren't a journalist you'd have the answer. 
Look, as a scientist (yes it's true) I'll give you a hint. The asteroid 
is 10 million miles away traveling at 20,000 miles per hour. So divide 
10 million miles by 20,000 mile/hour and get 500 hours. Bonus points. 24 
hours in a day so you have a little less than 21 days to get the rockets 
off to do something. But wait. The earth's gravity will start 
accelerating the asteroid toward the planet as it gets closer. So tell 
us just how much our 21 days are reduced by this effect? Can't do it? No 
matter a little bluster and an essay on what a "waste of time" saving 
your ass is will do instead.

Just call me the science guy. See if you would shut your yapping (libs 
always accuse others of doing what they themselves do) mouth and listen 
to some knowledge for a change, you'd know a little math and science.

We can discuss how doable a launch in 20 days is but we haven't 
discussed yet WHAT (how much mass) needs to be launched. I"m not going 
to do that for you because I don't take orders from ignorant 
journalist-writers, but I assure you the answer is quite interesting.

See how enlightening it is when you listen to scientists like Sergio and 
myself instead of name-calling like some grade-schooler?

> **And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio still 
> can't use the international scientific units of measurements.

And you can't even divide two numbers! Oh I forgot, nobody uses math 
after they graduate from high school.

>> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?
> 
> **Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.

Who do you think you are fooling? what kind of drugs are you on? You've 
just been thoroughly spanked and shown to be ignorant and yet you 
persist in your fantasy that everyone else is stupid? Get a life and get 
meds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685533

On 15/05/2018 12:09 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 8:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been 
>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in 
>>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to 
>>>>>>> policymakers,
>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is 
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative 
>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both 
>>>>>>> threats
>>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the 
>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>>
>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an 
>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, 
>>>>> Tokyo, Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to 
>>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses 
>>>> Earth. With less warning, nothing.
>>>>
>>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
>>
>> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a 
>> whole lot more about science than you do.
> 
> Ignorant journaist-strategic writer! Stick to spelling and grammar.
> 
>>   you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
> 
> This is so trivial if you weren't a journalist you'd have the answer. 
> Look, as a scientist (yes it's true) I'll give you a hint.

**You, a scientist? LOL! You're not a scientist's arsehole. You know 
nothing about science. That much is obvious to everyone.

  The asteroid
> is 10 million miles away traveling at 20,000 miles per hour. So divide 
> 10 million miles by 20,000 mile/hour and get 500 hours. Bonus points. 24 
> hours in a day so you have a little less than 21 days to get the rockets 
> off to do something. But wait. The earth's gravity will start 
> accelerating the asteroid toward the planet as it gets closer. So tell 
> us just how much our 21 days are reduced by this effect? Can't do it? No 
> matter a little bluster and an essay on what a "waste of time" saving 
> your ass is will do instead.
> 
> Just call me the science guy. See if you would shut your yapping (libs 
> always accuse others of doing what they themselves do) mouth and listen 
> to some knowledge for a change, you'd know a little math and science.

**I know more about maths and science than you will ever know. You are a 
moron. A yapping, lap-dog moron.

> 
> We can discuss how doable a launch in 20 days is but we haven't 
> discussed yet WHAT (how much mass) needs to be launched. I"m not going 
> to do that for you because I don't take orders from ignorant 
> journalist-writers, but I assure you the answer is quite interesting.
> 
> See how enlightening it is when you listen to scientists like Sergio and 
> myself instead of name-calling like some grade-schooler?
> 
>> **And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio 
>> still can't use the international scientific units of measurements.
> 
> And you can't even divide two numbers! Oh I forgot, nobody uses math 
> after they graduate from high school.

**Wrong. I employ maths every single day.


> 
>>> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?
>>
>> **Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.
> 
> Who do you think you are fooling? what kind of drugs are you on? You've 
> just been thoroughly spanked and shown to be ignorant and yet you 
> persist in your fantasy that everyone else is stupid? Get a life and get 
> meds.

**Stop your yapping, lap-dog.



-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685549

On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 4:01:10 PM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 12:09 PM, benj wrote:
> > On 5/14/2018 8:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
> >>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
> >>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been 
> >>>>>>> much
> >>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in 
> >>>>>>> characterizing the
> >>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to 
> >>>>>>> policymakers,
> >>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is 
> >>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative 
> >>>>>>> comparison of
> >>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both 
> >>>>>>> threats
> >>>>>>> into perspective."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
> >>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the 
> >>>>>> planet.
> >>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>> Trevor Wilson
> >>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an 
> >>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, 
> >>>>> Tokyo, Kolkata, etc.?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to 
> >>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses 
> >>>> Earth. With less warning, nothing.

Hear, hear.

> >>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
> >>
> >> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a 
> >> whole lot more about science than you do.

That is not saying much, for benj is a liar and a fraud.

> > Ignorant journaist-strategic writer! Stick to spelling and grammar.
> > 
> >>   you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
> > 
> > This is so trivial if you weren't a journalist you'd have the answer. 
> > Look, as a scientist (yes it's true) I'll give you a hint.
> 
> **You, a scientist? LOL! You're not a scientist's arsehole. You know 
> nothing about science. That much is obvious to everyone.

This is flattering to benj, the anti-scientist. He is beneath contempt for he lies in the most absurd manner. For instance, he denies that with electricity applied the rail gun bullet does NOT go faster, which is wrong. This makes him a bigger fool than a liar, as anyone can see from this video film:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments


> 
>   The asteroid
> > is 10 million miles away traveling at 20,000 miles per hour. So divide 
> > 10 million miles by 20,000 mile/hour and get 500 hours. Bonus points. 24 
> > hours in a day so you have a little less than 21 days to get the rockets 
> > off to do something. But wait. The earth's gravity will start 
> > accelerating the asteroid toward the planet as it gets closer. So tell 
> > us just how much our 21 days are reduced by this effect? Can't do it? No 
> > matter a little bluster and an essay on what a "waste of time" saving 
> > your ass is will do instead.
> > 
> > Just call me the science guy. See if you would shut your yapping (libs 
> > always accuse others of doing what they themselves do) mouth and listen 
> > to some knowledge for a change, you'd know a little math and science.
> 
> **I know more about maths and science than you will ever know. You are a 
> moron. A yapping, lap-dog moron.

How true.
> 
> > 
> > We can discuss how doable a launch in 20 days is but we haven't 
> > discussed yet WHAT (how much mass) needs to be launched. I"m not going 
> > to do that for you because I don't take orders from ignorant 
> > journalist-writers, but I assure you the answer is quite interesting.
> > 
> > See how enlightening it is when you listen to scientists like Sergio and 
> > myself instead of name-calling like some grade-schooler?
> > 
> >> **And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio 
> >> still can't use the international scientific units of measurements.
> > 
> > And you can't even divide two numbers! Oh I forgot, nobody uses math 
> > after they graduate from high school.
> 
> **Wrong. I employ maths every single day.
> 
> 
> > 
> >>> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?
> >>
> >> **Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.
> > 
> > Who do you think you are fooling? what kind of drugs are you on? You've 
> > just been thoroughly spanked and shown to be ignorant and yet you 
> > persist in your fantasy that everyone else is stupid? Get a life and get 
> > meds.
> 
> **Stop your yapping, lap-dog.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Trevor Wilson
> www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685551

Our Earth is being actively protected against asteroids
and meteors. Otherwise weld be toast.
Look at the other planets and moons- they’re riddled with craters.
This is a very nasty part of the Universe- ‘scientists’ that think it’s okay to create radioactivity must have lived around here, because on a subatomic scale that would result in lots of asteroids and meteors.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685552

On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 22:17:44 UTC+10, john  wrote:
> Our Earth is being actively protected against asteroids
> and meteors. Otherwise weld be toast.
> Look at the other planets and moons- they’re riddled with craters.
> This is a very nasty part of the Universe- ‘scientists’ that think it’s okay to create radioactivity must have lived around here, because on a subatomic scale that would result in lots of asteroids and meteors.

Tungushka remember! Happened only a century or so ago.

We do not know how many such comets or asteroids or large meteors fall into the oceans, Antarctica, and other uninhabited places.

The air and water on the Earth cover up the craters, made on land by such objects. Such is not the case on the Moon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685553

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Our Earth is being actively protected against asteroids
> and meteors. Otherwise weld be toast.
> Look at the other planets and moons- they’re riddled with craters.
> This is a very nasty part of the Universe- ‘scientists’ that think it’s
> okay to create radioactivity must have lived around here, because on a
> subatomic scale that would result in lots of asteroids and meteors.
> 

John you are such a hoot. 
I’m curious how big you think the fraction of radioactivity on this planet
is that is man made, compared to naturally occurring sources. Care to
venture a guess?

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685567

On 5/15/2018 4:37 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 4:01:10 PM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 12:09 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2018 8:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to
>>>>>>>>> policymakers,
>>>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>>>>> threats
>>>>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing,
>>>>>>> Tokyo, Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to
>>>>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses
>>>>>> Earth. With less warning, nothing.
> 
> Hear, hear.
> 
>>>>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
>>>>
>>>> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a
>>>> whole lot more about science than you do.
> 
> That is not saying much, for benj is a liar and a fraud.
> 
>>> Ignorant journaist-strategic writer! Stick to spelling and grammar.
>>>
>>>>    you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
>>>
>>> This is so trivial if you weren't a journalist you'd have the answer.
>>> Look, as a scientist (yes it's true) I'll give you a hint.
>>
>> **You, a scientist? LOL! You're not a scientist's arsehole. You know
>> nothing about science. That much is obvious to everyone.
> 
> This is flattering to benj, the anti-scientist. He is beneath contempt for he lies in the most absurd manner. For instance, he denies that with electricity applied the rail gun bullet does NOT go faster, which is wrong. This makes him a bigger fool than a liar, as anyone can see from this video film:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

Wow, Banjo! Trevor, the journalist/writer has a dearth of science 
knowledge on a par with yours. This makes him a PRIME candidate for 
conversion to YOUR kind of science. See if you can get him to view your 
video of the roller rolling down the slope! (He's pretty damn lazy so 
this may take some effort). Once he does, I'm sure the two of you can 
meet in your garage and have a nice circle jerk around your "pendulum".

By the way name-calling is considered bad form in science. It's only 
considered proper in the Lib fantasy worlds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685660

On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 11:56:15 PM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> On 5/15/2018 4:37 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 4:01:10 PM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >> On 15/05/2018 12:09 PM, benj wrote:
> >>> On 5/14/2018 8:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >>>> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
> >>>>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
> >>>>>>>>> much
> >>>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
> >>>>>>>>> characterizing the
> >>>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to
> >>>>>>>>> policymakers,
> >>>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
> >>>>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
> >>>>>>>>> comparison of
> >>>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
> >>>>>>>>> threats
> >>>>>>>>> into perspective."
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
> >>>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
> >>>>>>>> planet.
> >>>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
> >>>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
> >>>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing,
> >>>>>>> Tokyo, Kolkata, etc.?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to
> >>>>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses
> >>>>>> Earth. With less warning, nothing.
> > 
> > Hear, hear.
> > 
> >>>>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
> >>>>
> >>>> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a
> >>>> whole lot more about science than you do.
> > 
> > That is not saying much, for benj is a liar and a fraud.
> > 
> >>> Ignorant journaist-strategic writer! Stick to spelling and grammar.
> >>>
> >>>>    you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
> >>>
> >>> This is so trivial if you weren't a journalist you'd have the answer.
> >>> Look, as a scientist (yes it's true) I'll give you a hint.
> >>
> >> **You, a scientist? LOL! You're not a scientist's arsehole. You know
> >> nothing about science. That much is obvious to everyone.
> > 
> > This is flattering to benj, the anti-scientist. He is beneath contempt for he lies in the most absurd manner. For instance, he denies that with electricity applied the rail gun bullet does NOT go faster, which is wrong. This makes him a bigger fool than a liar, as anyone can see from this video film:
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
> > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
> 
> Wow, Banjo! Trevor, the journalist/writer has a dearth of science 
> knowledge on a par with yours. This makes him a PRIME candidate for 
> conversion to YOUR kind of science. See if you can get him to view your 
> video of the roller rolling down the slope! (He's pretty damn lazy so 
> this may take some effort). Once he does, I'm sure the two of you can 
> meet in your garage and have a nice circle jerk around your "pendulum".
> 
> By the way name-calling is considered bad form in science. It's only 
> considered proper in the Lib fantasy worlds.

You are not a scientist of any kind - an anti-scientist really, going by your blindness to my work, which can be seen by all.

He is completely right about you. You are the lowest kind of scum on the planet, benj, as you oppose progress with your deliberate lies; while flaunting scientific styles and thus corrupting the basis of science, which is pure, objective truth. 

The sooner all people understand this simple fact, that the anti-scientists you represent waste all the public funding for purely worthless purposes involving e=mcc nonsense, the better the scope for humanity and the good of the planet.

What is required is to make a new class of spaceships operating with internal force, and arm them with powerful rail guns. This fleet would fire rail gun bullets at asteroids/comets/etc. and deflect them with multiple hits for days and years, after finding and tracking them. 

It is only in this manner that the asteroid menace can be overcome, and safety provided to this planet.

Once again, I present links to the video films I made showing my discovery that the Lorenz force does not have a reaction, and the consequences. May all true scientists get inspired by these films, and do what best they can to overcome the presently corrupt physics establishment's negativity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics


Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685497

On 5/14/2018 7:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>> much
>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>> threats
>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>> planet.
>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>
>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>
>>>
>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to
>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth.
>>> With less warning, nothing.
>>>
>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
> 
> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a
> whole lot more about science than you do.
> 
> 
>  you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
> 
> **And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio still
> can't use the international scientific units of measurements.


yes I can,  (and no, you can't)
  no problem-o,
ez units conversion, use google  like this " miles = nanometers "

I can do it in Euros, Dinar, Dollar, Franc, Gulden, Mark, Peso, Pounds,
Riyal, Rupee, Shekel, Yen, or Yuan  no lira though,  same email, just
$4.99 to makemerich@paypal.com  I'm Ready!!


>> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?
> 
> **Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685676

On 15/05/2018 12:20 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 7:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>>> threats
>>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>>
>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to
>>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth.
>>>> With less warning, nothing.
>>>>
>>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
>>
>> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a
>> whole lot more about science than you do.
>>
>>
>>   you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
>>
>> **And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio still
>> can't use the international scientific units of measurements.
> 
> 
> yes I can,

**No, you can't. Because you don't.


   (and no, you can't)
>    no problem-o,
> ez units conversion, use google  like this " miles = nanometers "
> 
> I can do it in Euros, Dinar, Dollar, Franc, Gulden, Mark, Peso, Pounds,
> Riyal, Rupee, Shekel, Yen, or Yuan  no lira though,  same email, just
> $4.99 to makemerich@paypal.com  I'm Ready!!

**Sure, I could convert, but there is no reason to do so. The entire 
scientific community and 95% of the population of this planet uses the 
Metric system.

> 
> 
>>> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?
>>
>> **Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685773

On 5/15/2018 6:32 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 12:20 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 7:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to
>>>>>>>> policymakers,
>>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>>>> threats
>>>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to
>>>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth.
>>>>> With less warning, nothing.
>>>>>
>>>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
>>>
>>> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a
>>> whole lot more about science than you do.
>>>
>>>
>>>   you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
>>>
>>> **And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio still
>>> can't use the international scientific units of measurements.
>>
>>
>> yes I can,
> 
> **No, you can't. Because you don't.

only take some $ for time.

> 
> 
>   (and no, you can't)
>>    no problem-o,
>> ez units conversion, use google  like this " miles = nanometers "
>>
>> I can do it in Euros, Dinar, Dollar, Franc, Gulden, Mark, Peso, Pounds,
>> Riyal, Rupee, Shekel, Yen, or Yuan  no lira though,  same email, just
>> $4.99 to makemerich@paypal.com  I'm Ready!!
> 
> **Sure, I could convert, but there is no reason to do so. The entire
> scientific community and 95% of the population of this planet uses the
> Metric system.

Metric System was done by the French, they did French Bread, and Eifle
Tower, Brigitte Bardot, and poodle dogs.

what has Australia done ?  Fosters (made in England), roos, rabbits,
cain toadies, worlds longest strightaway, and target for de-orbiting
sattilites

> 
>>
>>
>>>> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?
>>>
>>> **Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685852

On 17/05/2018 3:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/15/2018 6:32 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 12:20 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2018 7:46 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 15/05/2018 10:11 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 5/14/2018 7:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to
>>>>>>>>> policymakers,
>>>>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>>>>> threats
>>>>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>>>>> planet.
>>>>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to
>>>>>> alter the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth.
>>>>>> With less warning, nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Mr. "scientist"
>>>>
>>>> **I never claimed to be a scientist, Mr Lap-dog. I just understand a
>>>> whole lot more about science than you do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    you didn't work out Sergio's little physics problem
>>>>
>>>> **And I have no intention of doing so. It's irrelevant. And Sergio still
>>>> can't use the international scientific units of measurements.
>>>
>>>
>>> yes I can,
>>
>> **No, you can't. Because you don't.
> 
> only take some $ for time.
> 
>>
>>
>>    (and no, you can't)
>>>     no problem-o,
>>> ez units conversion, use google  like this " miles = nanometers "
>>>
>>> I can do it in Euros, Dinar, Dollar, Franc, Gulden, Mark, Peso, Pounds,
>>> Riyal, Rupee, Shekel, Yen, or Yuan  no lira though,  same email, just
>>> $4.99 to makemerich@paypal.com  I'm Ready!!
>>
>> **Sure, I could convert, but there is no reason to do so. The entire
>> scientific community and 95% of the population of this planet uses the
>> Metric system.
> 
> Metric System was done by the French, they did French Bread, and Eifle
> Tower, Brigitte Bardot, and poodle dogs.

**Your point being?

> 
> what has Australia done ?  Fosters (made in England), roos, rabbits,
> cain toadies, worlds longest strightaway, and target for de-orbiting
> sattilites

**Your point being?

> 
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> of how much warning time one might have. Cat got your science tongue?
>>>>
>>>> **Waste of time on you. You wouldn't understand anyway.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web