Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #514745 > unrolled thread

Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks"

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:48 +0000
    Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:09 -0700
      Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 14:45 -0400
        Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:13 -0500
          Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:04 +0000
          Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 06:02 -0400
          Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 06:05 -0400
            Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:11 -0500
              Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 17:02 +0100
                Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:14 +0000
                Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:24 +0100
              Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:13 +0000
              Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 14:22 -0400
                Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 02:08 -0400
                  Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-20 10:55 -0400
                    Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 10:17 -0500
                      Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:56 -0500
                      Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:10 -0400
            Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:57 -0400
    Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:26 -0500
      Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 19:06 +0000
        Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:00 -0500
          Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:08 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#514745 — Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks"

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> To make a long story short I know now that wasn't truck loads of fresh dirt
> but something specially treated to help soak up the radiation from the 3
> hypocenters that were left at Ground Zero.  I just have to find that
> information again.  Any ideas?

Yes, seek the help of a mental health professional, kook.

There was no radiation, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#514749

And when GWB said he saw the first
plane hit the first building before he
went into the classroom?
Kook  babble?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514765

On 8/17/2015 2:09 PM, john wrote:
> And when GWB said he saw the first
> plane hit the first building before he
> went into the classroom?
> Kook  babble?


Never happened.


-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514807

"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mqta0v$6hb$2@dont-email.me...
> On 8/17/2015 2:09 PM, john wrote:
>> And when GWB said he saw the first
>> plane hit the first building before he
>> went into the classroom?
>> Kook  babble?
>
>
> Never happened.

Obviously you are one of those clowns that want to add to the big lies. 
See:

On 9/11, Bush watched the first plane impact
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U

And again, given that both a shotgun and a deep underground nuke have a 
dispersion then we know why the far sides of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC3 were not 
vaporized like the rest of those buildings.  See:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514836

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> And again, given that both a shotgun and a deep underground nuke have a 
> dispersion then we know why the far sides of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC3 were not 
> vaporized like the rest of those buildings.  See:

A shotgun works nothing like an underground nuclear explosion, kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515016

On 8/17/2015 4:13 PM, Rocky wrote:
> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mqta0v$6hb$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/17/2015 2:09 PM, john wrote:
>>> And when GWB said he saw the first
>>> plane hit the first building before he
>>> went into the classroom?
>>> Kook  babble?
>>
>>
>> Never happened.
>
> Obviously you are one of those clowns that want to add to the big lies.
> See:
>
> On 9/11, Bush watched the first plane impact
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U


Pass


-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515017

On 8/18/2015 1:01 AM, benj wrote:
> On 08/17/2015 04:13 PM, Rocky wrote:
>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mqta0v$6hb$2@dont-email.me...
>>> On 8/17/2015 2:09 PM, john wrote:
>>>> And when GWB said he saw the first
>>>> plane hit the first building before he
>>>> went into the classroom?
>>>> Kook  babble?
>>>
>>>
>>> Never happened.
>>
>> Obviously you are one of those clowns that want to add to the big lies.
>> See:
>
> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster


BJ is a kook just like Rocko.


-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515043

"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mquvuh$rej$1@dont-email.me...
> On 8/18/2015 1:01 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 08/17/2015 04:13 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mqta0v$6hb$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 8/17/2015 2:09 PM, john wrote:
>>>>> And when GWB said he saw the first
>>>>> plane hit the first building before he
>>>>> went into the classroom?
>>>>> Kook  babble?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Never happened.
>>>
>>> Obviously you are one of those clowns that want to add to the big lies.
>>> See:
>>
>> On 9/11, Bush watched the first plane impact
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U
>>
>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster

Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the other 
mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515052

On 18/08/2015 16:11, Rocky wrote:
> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mquvuh$rej$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/18/2015 1:01 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 08/17/2015 04:13 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:mqta0v$6hb$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 8/17/2015 2:09 PM, john wrote:
>>>>>> And when GWB said he saw the first
>>>>>> plane hit the first building before he
>>>>>> went into the classroom?
>>>>>> Kook  babble?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Never happened.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously you are one of those clowns that want to add to the big lies.
>>>> See:
>>>
>>> On 9/11, Bush watched the first plane impact
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U
>>>
>>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster
>
> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the other
> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.
>
> Rocky
>
>

Oh look, he used the sheeple word.

Do sheeple believe things without any evidence?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515074

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Obviously they do because they thought a CGI was a real jet and they also 
> thought a 757 could fold it's wings back just like a sparrow can fold it's 
> wings back.  So it is evidence but it's absurd evidence.

There were no CGI's, kook.

See below for the response to your kookery, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515076

On 18/08/2015 17:46, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mqvks5$at6$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 18/08/2015 16:11, Rocky wrote:
>>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mquvuh$rej$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 8/18/2015 1:01 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 08/17/2015 04:13 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>> "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:mqta0v$6hb$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> On 8/17/2015 2:09 PM, john wrote:
>>>>>>>> And when GWB said he saw the first
>>>>>>>> plane hit the first building before he
>>>>>>>> went into the classroom?
>>>>>>>> Kook  babble?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Never happened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously you are one of those clowns that want to add to the big
>>>>>> lies.
>>>>>> See:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/11, Bush watched the first plane impact
>>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster
>>>
>>> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the other
>>> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Oh look, he used the sheeple word.
>>
>> Do sheeple believe things without any evidence?
>
> Obviously they do because they thought a CGI was a real jet and they also
> thought a 757 could fold it's wings back just like a sparrow can fold it's
> wings back.  So it is evidence but it's absurd evidence.
>
> Rocky Sheeple
>
>


You must be a sheeple then, because you have never presented any 
evidence when questioned, all you do is evade the question or ignore it.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515073

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the other 
> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.

No, it means you are bat shit crazy, kook.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515085

On 8/18/2015 11:11 AM, Rocky wrote:
>
>>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster
>
> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the other
> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.

Yes. BJ watches TV 24/7



-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515369

On 08/18/2015 02:22 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 8/18/2015 11:11 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>
>>>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster
>>
>> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the other
>> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.
>
> Yes. BJ watches TV 24/7

HVAC watches TV 24/7, he WRITES the lies they promote there.

He has to make sure they are lying correctly!


-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515405

In article <L9eBx.3915$nM7.191@fx08.iad>, nobody@gmail.com says...
> 
> On 08/18/2015 02:22 PM, HVAC wrote:
> > On 8/18/2015 11:11 AM, Rocky wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster
> >>
> >> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the other
> >> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.
> >
> > Yes. BJ watches TV 24/7
> 
> HVAC watches TV 24/7, he WRITES the lies they promote there.
> 
> He has to make sure they are lying correctly!

Your fantasies are...interesting. I hope you don't really believe in 
strategic writers. But I kinda think you do...and it makes me laugh.

God Damn, I love kootsrds!

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. 
Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515409

"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message 
news:MPG.303fb474417ef37c98c237@news.giganews.com...
> In article <L9eBx.3915$nM7.191@fx08.iad>, nobody@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 08/18/2015 02:22 PM, HVAC wrote:
>> > On 8/18/2015 11:11 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster
>> >>
>> >> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the 
>> >> other
>> >> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.
>> >
>> > Yes. BJ watches TV 24/7
>>
>> HVAC watches TV 24/7, he WRITES the lies they promote there.
>>
>> He has to make sure they are lying correctly!
>
> Your fantasies are...interesting. I hope you don't really believe in
> strategic writers. But I kinda think you do...and it makes me laugh.

ROTFLMAO because it has been proven that Ted Olson lied about contacting his 
wife on 9/11/01 meaning all that crap about boxcutters is total CRAP because 
he was also the only one to mention boxcutters.  <G>

And the fact the media would not even try to retract that boxcutter bullshit 
after finding out Ted Olson lied helps prove the media didn't care about 
spreading lies.

I don't have to give you a link because it should be easy enough for you to 
search for the Ted Olson Barbara Olson bs yourself.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515492

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:17:09 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message 
>news:MPG.303fb474417ef37c98c237@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <L9eBx.3915$nM7.191@fx08.iad>, nobody@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 08/18/2015 02:22 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>> > On 8/18/2015 11:11 AM, Rocky wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>> Rocky you are a major Kook and maybe even a strategic poster
>>> >>
>>> >> Does that mean you worship your Television just like so many of the 
>>> >> other
>>> >> mislead sheeple that post here?  Looks that way.
>>> >
>>> > Yes. BJ watches TV 24/7
>>>
>>> HVAC watches TV 24/7, he WRITES the lies they promote there.
>>>
>>> He has to make sure they are lying correctly!
>>
>> Your fantasies are...interesting. I hope you don't really believe in
>> strategic writers. But I kinda think you do...and it makes me laugh.
>
>ROTFLMAO because it has been proven that Ted Olson lied about contacting his 
>wife on 9/11/01 meaning all that crap about boxcutters is total CRAP because 
>he was also the only one to mention boxcutters.  <G>
>

     No he wasn't. What do you think this lie of yours gains you?

>And the fact the media would not even try to retract that boxcutter bullshit 
>after finding out Ted Olson lied helps prove the media didn't care about 
>spreading lies.

     Since he didn't lie, there was nothing to retract.

>
>I don't have to give you a link because it should be easy enough for you to 
>search for the Ted Olson Barbara Olson bs yourself.

     You mean you can't because you're lying. Still.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515529

On 8/20/2015 11:17 AM, Rocky wrote:
>
> ROTFLMAO because it has been proven that Ted Olson lied about contacting his
> wife on 9/11/01 meaning all that crap about boxcutters is total CRAP because
> he was also the only one to mention boxcutters.  <G>


Girl make that pussy drop,
Spin it like a helicop,
Pay attention when I back it up like a dumper truck,
Move it like you know its hot,
Take it to the very top,
Drop that pussy down, down down down down make it pop,
Give it to em baby, give it to em good,
Give it to em baby, like you know he would,
Give it to you good, yeah give it to you proper,
Coz you know that he really really wanna,

You wanna love me
Wanna love me
You wanna la la la la la la love me







-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515388

On 8/20/2015 2:06 AM, benj wrote:
>
>> BJ is a kook just like Rocko.
>>
>
> HVAC is a strategic poster.

Truth = I am retired

 > His only purpose is to keep you from
> THINKING about what the gummint tells you is true.


Truth = I simply hold up a mirror and allow kooks like BJ to insult 
themselves. At the shop this is referred to as a 'do it yourself' insult


 > Just let HVAC do your
> thinking for you and you'll be fine.


Truth = BJ was correct this time



-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514754

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:5dj9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> To make a long story short I know now that wasn't truck loads of fresh 
>> dirt
>> but something specially treated to help soak up the radiation from the 3
>> hypocenters that were left at Ground Zero.  I just have to find that
>> information again.  Any ideas?
>
> Yes, seek the help of a mental health professional, kook.

I hope you are seeing someone about your meltdown.

lots removed 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web