Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #514745

Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks"

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks"
Date 2015-08-17 17:48 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <5dj9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <ou2dnUwKrcQ9-ObJnZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <FcOdnbuLFN7hckzInZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> To make a long story short I know now that wasn't truck loads of fresh dirt
> but something specially treated to help soak up the radiation from the 3
> hypocenters that were left at Ground Zero.  I just have to find that
> information again.  Any ideas?

Yes, seek the help of a mental health professional, kook.

There was no radiation, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:48 +0000
  Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:09 -0700
    Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 14:45 -0400
      Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:13 -0500
        Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:04 +0000
        Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 06:02 -0400
        Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 06:05 -0400
          Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:11 -0500
            Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 17:02 +0100
              Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:14 +0000
              Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:24 +0100
            Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:13 +0000
            Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 14:22 -0400
              Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 02:08 -0400
                Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-20 10:55 -0400
                Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 10:17 -0500
                Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:56 -0500
                Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:10 -0400
          Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:57 -0400
  Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:26 -0500
    Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 19:06 +0000
      Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:00 -0500
        Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:08 +0000

csiph-web