Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #514745
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" |
| Date | 2015-08-17 17:48 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <5dj9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ou2dnUwKrcQ9-ObJnZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <FcOdnbuLFN7hckzInZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > To make a long story short I know now that wasn't truck loads of fresh dirt > but something specially treated to help soak up the radiation from the 3 > hypocenters that were left at Ground Zero. I just have to find that > information again. Any ideas? Yes, seek the help of a mental health professional, kook. There was no radiation, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:48 +0000
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:09 -0700
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 14:45 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:13 -0500
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:04 +0000
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 06:02 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 06:05 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:11 -0500
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 17:02 +0100
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:14 +0000
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:24 +0100
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:13 +0000
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 14:22 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 02:08 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-20 10:55 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 10:17 -0500
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:56 -0500
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:10 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 06:57 -0400
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:26 -0500
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 19:06 +0000
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:00 -0500
Re: Rudi Giuliani's "120 dump trucks" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:08 +0000
csiph-web