Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #537692 > unrolled thread

Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 13:08 -0600
    Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-06 19:39 +0000
      Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 00:32 -0800
    Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-06 13:58 -0600
    Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 11:24 -0800
      Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 14:53 -0600
        Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 15:12 -0800
          Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 18:33 -0500
      Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 16:35 -0500

#537692 — Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks

Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks
> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/five-reasons-to-smile-about-paris-climate-talks-19768


> Peering closely at the climate talks underway in Paris could be a
> formula for depression.
>
> Entrenched divisions persist between richer and poorer countries on
> key negotiating issues. Pledges to tackle climate pollution that were
> submitted by nations before the talks began a week ago were
> underwhelming, and they would collectively allow global warming to
> blow well past the dangerous benchmark of 2°C (3.6°F).

> But, as this year’s historic round of United Nations climate talks
> enters its crucial closing week, with ministers arriving in Paris to
> take over from their underlings as they try to seal a deal by week’s
> end, here are five reasons to consider staying upbeat.
>
> The World Is Trying Something New


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#537699

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks
>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/five-reasons-to-smile-about-paris-climate-talks-19768
> 
> 
>> Peering closely at the climate talks underway in Paris could be a
>> formula for depression.
>>
>> Entrenched divisions persist between richer and poorer countries on
>> key negotiating issues. Pledges to tackle climate pollution that were
>> submitted by nations before the talks began a week ago were
>> underwhelming, and they would collectively allow global warming to
>> blow well past the dangerous benchmark of 2?C (3.6?F).
> 
>> But, as this year?s historic round of United Nations climate talks
>> enters its crucial closing week, with ministers arriving in Paris to
>> take over from their underlings as they try to seal a deal by week?s
>> end, here are five reasons to consider staying upbeat.
>>
>> The World Is Trying Something New
 
1. The whole thing is a joke.

2. Poor nations looking for payola.

3. Greens trying to muzzle "climate deniers".

4. China and India build coal plants.

5. Al Gore bores news anchor into unconsciousness.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537793

On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 11:46:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks
> >> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/five-reasons-to-smile-about-paris-climate-talks-19768
> > 
> > 
> >> Peering closely at the climate talks underway in Paris could be a
> >> formula for depression.
> >>
> >> Entrenched divisions persist between richer and poorer countries on
> >> key negotiating issues. Pledges to tackle climate pollution that were
> >> submitted by nations before the talks began a week ago were
> >> underwhelming, and they would collectively allow global warming to
> >> blow well past the dangerous benchmark of 2?C (3.6?F).
> > 
> >> But, as this year?s historic round of United Nations climate talks
> >> enters its crucial closing week, with ministers arriving in Paris to
> >> take over from their underlings as they try to seal a deal by week?s
> >> end, here are five reasons to consider staying upbeat.
> >>
> >> The World Is Trying Something New
>  
> 1. The whole thing is a joke.
> 
> 2. Poor nations looking for payola.
> 
> 3. Greens trying to muzzle "climate deniers".

  Yank their credentials and throw them out!

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/12/06/greens-want-muzzle-on-climate-deniers-claim-climate-hustle-film-is-full-of-lies-and-misinformation-without-seeing-it-demand-un-revoke-credentials-warn-skeptics-may/

  "Green groups want alternative views on climate science silenced in Paris, with a call for delegates with contrarian opinions to be ejected from the UN talks."

  "Climate change action lobby group SumOfUs has...  called on UN organisers to revoke the conference credentials 'of the most disingenuous ­climate deniers.'"

> 4. China and India build coal plants.
> 
> 5. Al Gore bores news anchor into unconsciousness.

  6. George Soros funds the whole shebang, planning to get even wealthier in the Carbon Credit Market than he ever got in currency speculation.


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537701

On 12/6/2015 1:08 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:

<snip crap>

NO US tax money to prop up 3rd world mismanaged governments via phoney 
"global worming"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537878

On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 11:08:30 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks
> > http://www.climatecentral.org/news/five-reasons-to-smile-about-paris-climate-talks-19768
> 
> 
> > Peering closely at the climate talks underway in Paris could be a
> > formula for depression.
> >
> > Entrenched divisions persist between richer and poorer countries on
> > key negotiating issues. Pledges to tackle climate pollution that were
> > submitted by nations before the talks began a week ago were
> > underwhelming, and they would collectively allow global warming to
> > blow well past the dangerous benchmark of 2°C (3.6°F).
> 
> > But, as this year's historic round of United Nations climate talks
> > enters its crucial closing week, with ministers arriving in Paris to
> > take over from their underlings as they try to seal a deal by week's
> > end, here are five reasons to consider staying upbeat.
> >
> > The World Is Trying Something New
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Paris will be having very bad weather soon.My heavy air theory predicts it. Boston has had no snow,and I predict a nice winter.No snow for Christmas.Italy,Germany,and Swiss hit hard with record breaking storms.  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537896

On 12/7/15 1:24 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> My heavy air theory predicts it


   You don't have a "heavy air theory", reber. No documentation, no
   physics, no mathematics".  Only some words you repeat over and over.
   You've never predicted anything accurately.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537920

On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 12:53:57 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 12/7/15 1:24 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > My heavy air theory predicts it
> 
>    You don't have a "heavy air theory", reber. No documentation, no
>    physics, no mathematics".  Only some words you repeat over and over.

  How do you know? That he hasn't explained details doesn't mean there aren't any.

  I mean, *you* have never said what you know, or think, about any of the topics you post links to, but that doesn't mean you have no knowledge of or opinions on them.

>    You've never predicted anything accurately.

  When have you?

  Here, let me show you what I mean. I have a "Sam Is Silent" theory.

  From what you have written in this group, I predict that you will continue to avoid actually engaging in discussion.

  Feel free to prove me wrong...


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537927

On 12/07/2015 06:12 PM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
> On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 12:53:57 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 12/7/15 1:24 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>> My heavy air theory predicts it
>>
>> You don't have a "heavy air theory", reber. No documentation, no
>> physics, no mathematics".  Only some words you repeat over and
>> over.
>
> How do you know? That he hasn't explained details doesn't mean there
> aren't any.
>
> I mean, *you* have never said what you know, or think, about any of
> the topics you post links to, but that doesn't mean you have no
> knowledge of or opinions on them.

Um, in this case actually it does...

>> You've never predicted anything accurately.
>
> When have you?
>
> Here, let me show you what I mean. I have a "Sam Is Silent" theory.
>
> From what you have written in this group, I predict that you will
> continue to avoid actually engaging in discussion.
>
> Feel free to prove me wrong...

Come on Mark, it's not as if Sam has NEVER entered into discussion here. 
I recall a discussion about a cartoon where a kid on roller skate was 
being "jet propelled" by letting air out of a balloon. Sam assured us 
all that physics said this was impossible. Of course Sam got his ass 
handed to him. And then there was the time he attempted to discuss the 
Tacoma narrows bridge instability. And again he was shown a fool. And of 
course he used to TRY to prove that there was global warming from CO2 
(back before the global temperature has stopped going up) and virtually 
every assertion he'd make was refuted with references to papers and 
textbooks. So no wonder he's scared to discuss any physics. All he does 
now is cut and paste so he can say "I didn't write that" and constantly 
repost the charter which says the group is for physics discussion which 
he now never does. Some "professor"!

> Mark L. Fergerson


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#537910

On 12/07/2015 02:24 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 11:08:30 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks
>>> http://www.climatecentral.org/news/five-reasons-to-smile-about-paris-climate-talks-19768
>>
>>
>>> Peering closely at the climate talks underway in Paris could be a
>>> formula for depression.
>>>
>>> Entrenched divisions persist between richer and poorer countries on
>>> key negotiating issues. Pledges to tackle climate pollution that were
>>> submitted by nations before the talks began a week ago were
>>> underwhelming, and they would collectively allow global warming to
>>> blow well past the dangerous benchmark of 2°C (3.6°F).
>>
>>> But, as this year's historic round of United Nations climate talks
>>> enters its crucial closing week, with ministers arriving in Paris to
>>> take over from their underlings as they try to seal a deal by week's
>>> end, here are five reasons to consider staying upbeat.
>>>
>>> The World Is Trying Something New
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> community, and physics-related social issues.
>
> Paris will be having very bad weather soon.My heavy air theory predicts it. Boston has had no snow,and I predict a nice winter.No snow for Christmas.Italy,Germany,and Swiss hit hard with record breaking storms.  TreBert
>
Herb, why doesn't Sam promote your theory of
heavy air? It predicts all extreme weather right on the money but Sam 
does want to think!

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web