Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #537927

Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/07/2015 06:12 PM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
> On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 12:53:57 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 12/7/15 1:24 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>> My heavy air theory predicts it
>>
>> You don't have a "heavy air theory", reber. No documentation, no
>> physics, no mathematics".  Only some words you repeat over and
>> over.
>
> How do you know? That he hasn't explained details doesn't mean there
> aren't any.
>
> I mean, *you* have never said what you know, or think, about any of
> the topics you post links to, but that doesn't mean you have no
> knowledge of or opinions on them.

Um, in this case actually it does...

>> You've never predicted anything accurately.
>
> When have you?
>
> Here, let me show you what I mean. I have a "Sam Is Silent" theory.
>
> From what you have written in this group, I predict that you will
> continue to avoid actually engaging in discussion.
>
> Feel free to prove me wrong...

Come on Mark, it's not as if Sam has NEVER entered into discussion here. 
I recall a discussion about a cartoon where a kid on roller skate was 
being "jet propelled" by letting air out of a balloon. Sam assured us 
all that physics said this was impossible. Of course Sam got his ass 
handed to him. And then there was the time he attempted to discuss the 
Tacoma narrows bridge instability. And again he was shown a fool. And of 
course he used to TRY to prove that there was global warming from CO2 
(back before the global temperature has stopped going up) and virtually 
every assertion he'd make was refuted with references to papers and 
textbooks. So no wonder he's scared to discuss any physics. All he does 
now is cut and paste so he can say "I didn't write that" and constantly 
repost the charter which says the group is for physics discussion which 
he now never does. Some "professor"!

> Mark L. Fergerson


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 13:08 -0600
  Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-06 19:39 +0000
    Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 00:32 -0800
  Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-06 13:58 -0600
  Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 11:24 -0800
    Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 14:53 -0600
      Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 15:12 -0800
        Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 18:33 -0500
    Re: Five Reasons to Smile About Paris Climate Talks benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 16:35 -0500

csiph-web