Groups > sci.physics > #554746 > unrolled thread

Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

Started by	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post	2016-02-19 16:34 -0800
Last post	2016-02-21 18:31 +0000
Articles	20 on this page of 102 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →

#554746 — Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 16:34 -0800
Subject	Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.
Message-ID	<145dc270-174e-4c35-9eb5-3c5c0785dc16@googlegroups.com>

Why do you think that is?

I know why:

Wizard of Oz and the Discovery of Atmospheric Plasma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl-GOPq8aA0

Why Meteorologists Maintain Dumb Explanations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-1p1rJp1x4

H2O Surface Tension and Tornadoes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7zT-26BYQ

How Non-Newtonian Fluids Reveal the Mechanism Underlying Ice
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6vPdAo78rU

Surface Tension, Jet Streams, Storms and the Twisted Truth of Meteorology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6GZEn7N7Ss

Convection Versus Plasma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk

Impact of Polarity Neutralization on the Water Sciences
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSGv08Rb_Lo

Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#554754

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-02-19 16:48 -0800
Message-ID	<93f86b73-0c93-45c3-9f52-f3b7079ae882@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554746

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:34:27 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> Why do you think that is?
> 
> I know why:
> 
> Wizard of Oz and the Discovery of Atmospheric Plasma
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl-GOPq8aA0
> 
> Why Meteorologists Maintain Dumb Explanations
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-1p1rJp1x4
> 
> H2O Surface Tension and Tornadoes
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7zT-26BYQ
> 
> How Non-Newtonian Fluids Reveal the Mechanism Underlying Ice
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6vPdAo78rU
> 
> Surface Tension, Jet Streams, Storms and the Twisted Truth of Meteorology
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6GZEn7N7Ss
> 
> Convection Versus Plasma
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
> 
> Impact of Polarity Neutralization on the Water Sciences
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSGv08Rb_Lo
> 
> Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw

Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554757

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:00 -0800
Message-ID	<9cc71412-628f-4b6c-9857-b5e7146b3547@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554754

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 

> Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.

Look it up.

Convection Versus Plasma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554761

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:02 -0800
Message-ID	<3362a4f8-fdde-4724-8734-ad44335f112a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554757

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:00:13 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 
> 
> > Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
> 
> Look it up.
> 
> Convection Versus Plasma
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk

Convection Versus Plasma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554765

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 19:11 -0600
Message-ID	<5OmdnW5E1uGtIFrLnZ2dnUU7-KkAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to	#554761

On 2/19/16 7:02 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> Convection Versus Plasma



   There is not enough energy in the troposphere to create plasma,
   except in a channel of lightning, which is fleeting.

   I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554769

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:20 -0800
Message-ID	<aa369547-708f-4d18-90a7-d09dd2fdf29c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554765

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:11:14 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/19/16 7:02 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> > Convection Versus Plasma
> 
> 
> 
>    There is not enough energy in the troposphere to create plasma,
>    except in a channel of lightning, which is fleeting.
> 
>    I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.

So, Sam, why do you think it is meteorologist refuse to measure comparative weight of moist air?  

For a clue see the links above.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554774

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 19:27 -0600
Message-ID	<5OmdnWhE1uGWXFrLnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#554769

On 2/19/16 7:20 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> So, Sam, why do you think it is meteorologist refuse to measure comparative weight of moist air?

   It's measured all the time, James.  Look it up.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554876

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 09:38 +0100
Message-ID	<na98hb$88r$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#554774

Dne 20/02/2016 v 02:27 Sam Wormley napsal(a):
> On 2/19/16 7:20 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>> So, Sam, why do you think it is meteorologist refuse to measure comparative weight of moist air?
> 
>    It's measured all the time, James.  Look it up.
> 
> 
Because meteorology is applied physics
and it is well measured in more fundamental science domains,
like physical chemistry.

Why to learn physics, if he can make up his own.
By words, everything is possible.
But language of science is math,
that is avoided by pseudoscientists as the cross by evil,
as it reveals the nonsense in verbal ideas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

BTW, artillery and aviation tables
count with moisture lowering air density for ages.

Everybody can easily verify the fact water decreases air density
even at home by water evaporation, e.g. by measuring increased pressure
- via water filler U tube - at same volume.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554939

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 09:13 -0800
Message-ID	<3a5e8a5a-018a-46ef-b5b4-0adc7de4f5f9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554876

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:38:59 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:

> Because meteorology is applied physics

Partly.  It's also superstition.


> and it is well measured in more fundamental science domains,
> like physical chemistry.
> 
> Why to learn physics, if he can make up his own.
> By words, everything is possible.
> But language of science is math,
> that is avoided by pseudoscientists as the cross by evil,
> as it reveals the nonsense in verbal ideas.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience
> 
> BTW, artillery and aviation tables
> count with moisture lowering air density for ages.
> 
> Everybody can easily verify the fact water decreases air density
> even at home by water evaporation, e.g. by measuring increased pressure
> - via water filler U tube - at same volume.

Absurd.  You are a moron.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555004

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-02-20 19:06 +0000
Message-ID	<o1qmpc-55f.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#554939

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:38:59 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:
> 
>> Because meteorology is applied physics
> 
> Partly.  It's also superstition.
> 
> 
>> and it is well measured in more fundamental science domains,
>> like physical chemistry.
>> 
>> Why to learn physics, if he can make up his own.
>> By words, everything is possible.
>> But language of science is math,
>> that is avoided by pseudoscientists as the cross by evil,
>> as it reveals the nonsense in verbal ideas.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience
>> 
>> BTW, artillery and aviation tables
>> count with moisture lowering air density for ages.
>> 
>> Everybody can easily verify the fact water decreases air density
>> even at home by water evaporation, e.g. by measuring increased pressure
>> - via water filler U tube - at same volume.
> 
> Absurd.  You are a moron.


Symptoms of Delusional Disorder

"Attempts by another to qualify or clarify are often met with strong
emotions, such as hostility"

http://www.regionalcenter.org/mental-health/delusional-disorder


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554764

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 19:09 -0600
Message-ID	<5OmdnW9E1uF8IVrLnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#554757

On 2/19/16 7:00 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>
> Convection Versus Plasma

   There is not enough energy in the troposphere to create plasma,
   except in a channel of lightning, which is fleeting.

   I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554766

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:15 -0800
Message-ID	<13d9f88a-20b1-456d-a012-8910344fa8f6@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554764

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:

>    I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.

I'm thinking I do.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554768

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 19:17 -0600
Message-ID	<5OmdnWlE1uErI1rLnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#554766

On 2/19/16 7:15 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>     I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.
>
> I'm thinking I do.
>

   I doubt that you know what plasma is.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554770

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:22 -0800
Message-ID	<a570f743-d9bf-4cb6-ad35-56129e7aacea@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554768

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/19/16 7:15 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> >>     I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.
> >
> > I'm thinking I do.
> >
> 
>    I doubt that you know what plasma is.

Why don't you look it up on the internet. You have a computer, don't you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554780 — slow, medium & fast waves of Alfven

From	noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:37 -0800
Subject	slow, medium & fast waves of Alfven
Message-ID	<598538cf-25c2-4c2d-bf6f-8ec75f461341@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554770

most in physics are still in the '60s school of cosmology,
ignoring the 99.99 of reality that is plasma phsyics
(Alfven waves

> >    I doubt that you know what plasma is.
> 
> Why don't you look it up on the internet. You have a computer, don't you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554779

From	Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date	2016-02-19 20:36 -0500
Message-ID	<iogfcb5p151gja1ihpnfu04de29gl8t3dq@4ax.com>
In reply to	#554768

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:17:42 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

>On 2/19/16 7:15 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>>>     I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.
>>
>> I'm thinking I do.
>>
>
>   I doubt that you know what plasma is.

Troll vs. Troll.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554795

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:59 -0800
Message-ID	<e0ec1db3-a239-439b-9b44-975ff19efa69@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554779

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:36:31 PM UTC-8, Wally W. wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:17:42 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> >On 2/19/16 7:15 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> >> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >>>     I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.
> >>
> >> I'm thinking I do.
> >>
> >
> >   I doubt that you know what plasma is.
> 
> Troll vs. Troll.

A troll calling other a troll.  Hmm.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554787

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-02-20 01:37 +0000
Message-ID	<1jskpc-op8.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#554766

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
>>    I'll bet you don't know what plasma is, James.
> 
> I'm thinking I do.  

You are thinking you know lots of things; that is the base problem.

This might help you understand:

http://www.regionalcenter.org/mental-health/delusional-disorder
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555046

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-02-20 12:13 -0800
Message-ID	<1cf1938d-45e2-47e5-b735-e27f374590cf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554757

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:00:13 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 
> 
> > Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
> 
> Look it up.
> 
> Convection Versus Plasma
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk

I don't need to look it up, I know what it says. Why are you ducking the question? Are you afraid that it will lead to your loss of faced? I think so...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555050

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 21:19 +0100
Message-ID	<naahjt$grp$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#555046

Dne 20/02/2016 v 21:13 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a):
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:00:13 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 
>>
>>> Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
>>
>> Look it up.
>>
>> Convection Versus Plasma
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
> 
> I don't need to look it up, I know what it says. Why are you ducking the question? Are you afraid that it will lead to your loss of faced? I think so...
> 

It is his usual tactic,
when directly questioned about his particular knowledge,
distracting from the fact he has no clue.

You are wasting your time on him.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →

csiph-web

Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

Contents

#554746 — Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

#554754

#554757

#554761

#554765

#554769

#554774

#554876

#554939

#555004

#554764

#554766

#554768

#554770

#554780 — slow, medium & fast waves of Alfven

#554779

#554795

#554787

#555046

#555050