Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #548819 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 103 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-28 11:17 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 07:25 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 07:36 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:45 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:38 -0800
Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 02:40 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:27 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-31 19:13 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:30 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:22 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:35 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:44 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:19 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:25 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:02 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:31 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:32 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 15:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:17 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:23 +0000
Re: Why Chemtrails? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:56 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:29 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:28 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:35 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 01:31 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 03:43 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:49 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:59 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:16 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 02:43 -0500
Re: Why Chemtrails? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:35 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:37 -0800
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:31 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:16 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 18:13 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 23:53 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:01 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:05 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:10 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 18:22 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:29 -0500
Re: There's no cure, just consequences. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:24 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:59 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:22 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 14:27 +0000
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:56 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:15 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:04 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:13 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:25 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:38 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 07:08 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:45 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:28 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:41 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:09 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:32 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:27 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:20 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 13:25 -0800
Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600 |
| Subject | Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years |
| Message-ID | <q7Sdne7aEoMD_DfLnZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> |
When I was still in High School I remember seeing the trails behind jets stay in the air a lot longer than normal and the guy in the following audio now knows someone has been spraying the skies for over 40 years in the name of geo-engineering and that matches what I noticed many years ago. Coast to Coast; Michael J. Murphy; Geoengineering and the climate change agenda https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7874VBtf7YI Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 11:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b2ebddc0-1660-4116-bb2a-a0f0a3b0b88f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #548819 |
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:44:50 AM UTC-8, Rocky wrote: > When I was still in High School I remember seeing the trails behind jets > stay in the air a lot longer than normal and the guy in the following audio > now knows someone has been spraying the skies for over 40 years in the name > of geo-engineering and that matches what I noticed many years ago. > > Coast to Coast; Michael J. Murphy; Geoengineering and the climate change > agenda > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7874VBtf7YI > > Rocky "Coast to Coast" radio... now THERE's a reliable source... NOT!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <uvdmabpmrdumb5vnsrjsfiiv3potodf7jt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #548819 |
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:42:36 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>When I was still in High School I remember seeing the trails behind jets
>stay in the air a lot longer than normal
How long is normal? You will, of course, present valid,
verifiable evidence of what constitutes a normal amount of time.
>and the guy in the following audio
>now knows someone has been spraying the skies for over 40 years in the name
>of geo-engineering and that matches what I noticed many years ago.
>
>Coast to Coast; Michael J. Murphy; Geoengineering and the climate change
>agenda
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7874VBtf7YI
>
They are contrails. They are a normal result of jets flying in
the air.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.311549d3d327c7c098c4aa@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #549037 |
In article <uvdmabpmrdumb5vnsrjsfiiv3potodf7jt@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:42:36 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > >When I was still in High School I remember seeing the trails behind jets > >stay in the air a lot longer than normal > > How long is normal? You will, of course, present valid, > verifiable evidence of what constitutes a normal amount of time. Don't be in a hurry. > > >and the guy in the following audio > >now knows someone has been spraying the skies for over 40 years in the name > >of geo-engineering and that matches what I noticed many years ago. > > > >Coast to Coast; Michael J. Murphy; Geoengineering and the climate change > >agenda > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7874VBtf7YI > > > > They are contrails. They are a normal result of jets flying in > the air. Yes, but the loons don't want to understand that. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 07:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f3f75e99-3a80-42e5-9517-f88ee54d631a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #549086 |
BDK- are you saying that there have never been cloud-seeding experiments? Or just never high altitude jet cloud seeders- only little weeny ones? Or just never where there were any people living below? Or what are you saying, BDK? Are you just a blanket "there is nothing behind that curtain" kind of guy?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 07:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8582ac5d-cf97-4ffd-98fd-1c93142b5ada@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #549092 |
BDK- are you saying that there have never been cloud-seeding experiments? Or just never high altitude jet cloud seeders- only little weeny ones? Or just never where there were any people living below? Or what are you saying, BDK? Are you just a blanket "there is nothing behind that curtain" kind of guy? ------------ John is the perfect example of my idea that no kook believes in only ONE kooky thing. Here john jumps aboard the 'chemtrail' train. Typical. John do you also believe in ghosts and ESP like BJ? (John has been avoiding these questions so I don't expect him to agree with me here. Of course HE knows I'm right)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 12:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <OyNqy.231298$qC2.173912@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #549094 |
On 01/29/2016 10:36 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BDK- are you saying that there have never
> been cloud-seeding experiments?
> Or just never high altitude jet cloud seeders-
> only little weeny ones?
> Or just never where there were any people
> living below?
> Or what are you saying, BDK? Are you
> just a blanket "there is nothing behind
> that curtain" kind of guy?
> ------------
>
> John is the perfect example of my idea that no kook believes in only ONE kooky thing.
>
> Here john jumps aboard the 'chemtrail' train.
>
> Typical.
>
> John do you also believe in ghosts and ESP like BJ?
>
> (John has been avoiding these questions so I don't expect him to agree with me here. Of course HE knows I'm right)
John, chemtrails have had samples taken and been analyzed. They are NOT
water vapor beyond doubt. But don't expect HVAC to do anything but deny
that data. He has a political agenda to promote.
(Overlords have said chemtrails are GOOD for you!)
==
I have given numerous references to the scientific work done on ESP,
Remote viewing and the like with many excellent books easily available
on Amazon.com. HVAC prefers not to read anything so as to remain
ignorant. I have referenced a number of Nobel prize-winning scientists
who have found significant ESP evidence. HVAC who thinks he is the
“moderator” of an unmoderated newsgroup thinks he's smarter than them. I
have referenced government projects costing millions verifying ESP
effects. In spite of FOIA proof, HVAC acts as if they do not exist. I
have listed PROOF BEYOND DOUBT of a government cover-up of UFO
information from the government's own documents. HVAC admits nothing.
So everybody, the ONLY thing that anonymous HVAC (whatever that is) has
going for "him" is the assertion that this or that person "believes" in
Ghosts, ESP, or the like. That's it. He has ONLY his "superpowers" to
tell you what another person has in their mind! No evidence, no records
of posts, nada. Of course such “superpowers” would be ESP, would they
not? Science is only about evidence. Religion and pseudoscience is about
"belief". HVAC has no science education and knows no science.
So the only question YOU must ask is are you interested in science or
strategic writer fantasy. Make your choice.
These paragraphs will be repeated every time HVAC accuses someone of
"believing" in something.
PS. My “superpowers” tell me HVAC is Gay and needs to come out.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <omtnab5dpnmam3mtkubjnbhv7vhi20bucu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #549086 |
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:05:45 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <uvdmabpmrdumb5vnsrjsfiiv3potodf7jt@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:42:36 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> >When I was still in High School I remember seeing the trails behind jets
>> >stay in the air a lot longer than normal
>>
>> How long is normal? You will, of course, present valid,
>> verifiable evidence of what constitutes a normal amount of time.
>
>Don't be in a hurry.
>
I'm not. I am well aware that he will live up to his name of Run
Away Roger. It's an integral part of who and what he is.
>> >and the guy in the following audio
>> >now knows someone has been spraying the skies for over 40 years in the name
>> >of geo-engineering and that matches what I noticed many years ago.
>> >
>> >Coast to Coast; Michael J. Murphy; Geoengineering and the climate change
>> >agenda
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7874VBtf7YI
>>
>> They are contrails. They are a normal result of jets flying in
>> the air.
>
>Yes, but the loons don't want to understand that.
They frequently go out of their way to avoid having to deal with
the truth.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31169be339a231cb98c4af@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #549260 |
In article <omtnab5dpnmam3mtkubjnbhv7vhi20bucu@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:05:45 -0500, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >In article <uvdmabpmrdumb5vnsrjsfiiv3potodf7jt@4ax.com>, > >compuelf@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:42:36 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> > >> >When I was still in High School I remember seeing the trails behind jets > >> >stay in the air a lot longer than normal > >> > >> How long is normal? You will, of course, present valid, > >> verifiable evidence of what constitutes a normal amount of time. > > > >Don't be in a hurry. > > > > I'm not. I am well aware that he will live up to his name of Run > Away Roger. It's an integral part of who and what he is. > > >> >and the guy in the following audio > >> >now knows someone has been spraying the skies for over 40 years in the name > >> >of geo-engineering and that matches what I noticed many years ago. > >> > > >> >Coast to Coast; Michael J. Murphy; Geoengineering and the climate change > >> >agenda > >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7874VBtf7YI > >> > >> They are contrails. They are a normal result of jets flying in > >> the air. > > > >Yes, but the loons don't want to understand that. > > They frequently go out of their way to avoid having to deal with > the truth. The tap dancing is annoying. I've always hated tap dancing. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 08:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <eb0bb61c-4aaa-4fe4-932b-d7884e725681@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #549363 |
Inspector Kluso doing the soft shoe :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500 |
| Subject | Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <Ek6ry.169335$K21.157685@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #549363 |
So I have made the statement that Chemtrails have been analyzed and are
not water vapor. This of course set off all the shills into convulsions
of calling "kook" and "liar" and all the rest. Doesn't matter if anyone
believes me. But the big shill response is probably the best proof there
is that SOMETHING is going on with Chemtrails. But what could it be?
Lets speculate: Distribution of metal particles in the atmosphere over
cities could be military experiments for the use of weather modification
as a weapon. Could be, as the military has been interested in weather
weapons for a long time. History shows that experiments using civilian
population is not regraded as out of bounds by them. Which means it
could be tests of biowarfare. Government has been caught spreading
bacteria around cities as "tests" before. Or perhaps the Ozone problem
is far worse than we think and the chemtrail materials are to reflect a
good part of the UV radiation coming through. Makes some sense.
Governments hate to give out bad news especially when they are to blame
like the space shuttle chemicals destroying the ozone layer. Or maybe
it's the same idea but rather with regard to modifying "global warming".
Could be, but science pretty much shows that "global warming" is a major
fraud to create a huge energy tax, so it's doubtful that any corrections
are needed.
As to what I believe is going on? I can't say. As to what YOU believe is
going on, I could not give a damn. But the shills certainly do. They
keep demanding "proof" and name-calling. It's their job. If you want
"proof" then dig in and do your own research. Amazon has plenty of books
to start. My opinion is the clowns in government are doing FAR more
destructive OTHER things than just spraying cities with chemicals. And
they really could use some exposure. Ignore the shills.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <n8j4m4$s8v$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #549401 |
On 30/01/2016 17:23, benj wrote: > So I have made the statement that Chemtrails have been analyzed and are > not water vapor. Indeed you have. > This of course set off all the shills into convulsions > of calling "kook" and "liar" and all the rest. If you are including me in that group, I must point out that I have not called you a liar or a kook. Hang on, I can't be a 'shill' as I have called you neither. > Doesn't matter if anyone > believes me. But the big shill response is probably the best proof there > is that SOMETHING is going on with Chemtrails. But what could it be? Do tell me. > > Lets speculate: No harm in that. > Distribution of metal particles in the atmosphere over > cities could be military experiments for the use of weather modification > as a weapon. That is indeed possible. > Could be, as the military has been interested in weather > weapons for a long time. History shows that experiments using civilian > population is not regraded I take it you mean regarded. > as out of bounds by them. Which means it > could be tests of biowarfare. > Government has been caught spreading > bacteria around cities as "tests" before. I don't recall a provable instance of this. ? Or perhaps the Ozone problem > is far worse than we think and the chemtrail materials are to reflect a > good part of the UV radiation coming through. Makes some sense. That again is possible, but why keep that a secret? > Governments hate to give out bad news especially when they are to blame > like the space shuttle chemicals destroying the ozone layer. I take it you mean the exhaust? > Or maybe > it's the same idea but rather with regard to modifying "global warming". See above. > Could be, but science pretty much shows that "global warming" is a major > fraud to create a huge energy tax, so it's doubtful that any corrections > are needed. If global warming is not a fact, I think it more likely disagreement in the scientific community.] > > As to what I believe is going on? I can't say. As to what YOU believe is > going on, I could not give a damn. But the shills certainly do. They > keep demanding "proof" and name-calling. As for myself, I have just requested your evidence, evidence of course is not proof. > It's their job. If you want > "proof" then dig in and do your own research. Amazon has plenty of books > to start. My opinion is the clowns in government are doing FAR more > destructive OTHER things than just spraying cities with chemicals. Could you tell us what? > And > they really could use some exposure. Ignore the shills. > > As I am not a 'shill' & have not worked for a government for at least 30 years why do you ignore my request(s)? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <AAgry.252146$pV5.62314@fx21.iad> |
| In reply to | #549416 |
On 01/30/2016 03:01 PM, Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 30/01/2016 17:23, benj wrote:
>> So I have made the statement that Chemtrails have been analyzed and are
>> not water vapor.
>
> Indeed you have.
>
>> This of course set off all the shills into convulsions
>> of calling "kook" and "liar" and all the rest.
>
> If you are including me in that group, I must point out that I have not
> called you a liar or a kook.
>
> Hang on, I can't be a 'shill' as I have called you neither.
>
>> Doesn't matter if anyone
>> believes me. But the big shill response is probably the best proof there
>> is that SOMETHING is going on with Chemtrails. But what could it be?
>
> Do tell me.
>
>>
>> Lets speculate:
>
> No harm in that.
>
>> Distribution of metal particles in the atmosphere over
>> cities could be military experiments for the use of weather modification
>> as a weapon.
>
> That is indeed possible.
>
>> Could be, as the military has been interested in weather
>> weapons for a long time. History shows that experiments using civilian
>> population is not regraded
> I take it you mean regarded.
>
>> as out of bounds by them. Which means it
>> could be tests of biowarfare.
>
>
>> Government has been caught spreading
>> bacteria around cities as "tests" before.
>
> I don't recall a provable instance of this.
>
> ? Or perhaps the Ozone problem
>> is far worse than we think and the chemtrail materials are to reflect a
>> good part of the UV radiation coming through. Makes some sense.
>
> That again is possible, but why keep that a secret?
>
>> Governments hate to give out bad news especially when they are to blame
>> like the space shuttle chemicals destroying the ozone layer.
>
> I take it you mean the exhaust?
>
>> Or maybe
>> it's the same idea but rather with regard to modifying "global warming".
>
> See above.
>
>> Could be, but science pretty much shows that "global warming" is a major
>> fraud to create a huge energy tax, so it's doubtful that any corrections
>> are needed.
>
> If global warming is not a fact, I think it more likely disagreement in
> the scientific community.]
>
>>
>> As to what I believe is going on? I can't say. As to what YOU believe is
>> going on, I could not give a damn. But the shills certainly do. They
>> keep demanding "proof" and name-calling.
>
> As for myself, I have just requested your evidence, evidence of course
> is not proof.
>
>> It's their job. If you want
>> "proof" then dig in and do your own research. Amazon has plenty of books
>> to start. My opinion is the clowns in government are doing FAR more
>> destructive OTHER things than just spraying cities with chemicals.
>
> Could you tell us what?
>
>> And
>> they really could use some exposure. Ignore the shills.
>>
>>
>
> As I am not a 'shill' & have not worked for a government for at least 30
> years why do you ignore my request(s)?
Not directly working for a government doesn't mean you are not a shill.
It's all about spinning facts and discrediting evidence. Why a person
does this can be for a wide variety of reasons. In fact government make
an effort NOT to have their employees shill on the internet or elsewhere
because when they have done this they got caught and there was an uproar.
I know, I know, you never heard of that happening. And why don't I
provide you with chapter and verse of the "evidence" so you can debunk it?
Sorry. I"m not looking for converts. I'm not preaching gospel. If you
want evidence it's out there. It's not hard to find. Pretending you need
help to find it is just not going to work.
You are correct, that you've been quite mild and have not called me a
kook or suggested I was insane. Others have made up for your
shortcomings, however.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <n8kjpg$b2e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #549476 |
On 31/01/2016 05:03, benj wrote: > On 01/30/2016 03:01 PM, Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 30/01/2016 17:23, benj wrote: >>> So I have made the statement that Chemtrails have been analyzed and are >>> not water vapor. >> >> Indeed you have. >> >>> This of course set off all the shills into convulsions >>> of calling "kook" and "liar" and all the rest. >> >> If you are including me in that group, I must point out that I have not >> called you a liar or a kook. >> >> Hang on, I can't be a 'shill' as I have called you neither. >> >>> Doesn't matter if anyone >>> believes me. But the big shill response is probably the best proof there >>> is that SOMETHING is going on with Chemtrails. But what could it be? >> >> Do tell me. >> >>> >>> Lets speculate: >> >> No harm in that. >> >>> Distribution of metal particles in the atmosphere over >>> cities could be military experiments for the use of weather modification >>> as a weapon. >> >> That is indeed possible. >> >>> Could be, as the military has been interested in weather >>> weapons for a long time. History shows that experiments using civilian >>> population is not regraded >> I take it you mean regarded. >> >>> as out of bounds by them. Which means it >>> could be tests of biowarfare. >> >> >>> Government has been caught spreading >>> bacteria around cities as "tests" before. >> >> I don't recall a provable instance of this. >> >> ? Or perhaps the Ozone problem >>> is far worse than we think and the chemtrail materials are to reflect a >>> good part of the UV radiation coming through. Makes some sense. >> >> That again is possible, but why keep that a secret? >> >>> Governments hate to give out bad news especially when they are to blame >>> like the space shuttle chemicals destroying the ozone layer. >> >> I take it you mean the exhaust? >> >>> Or maybe >>> it's the same idea but rather with regard to modifying "global warming". >> >> See above. >> >>> Could be, but science pretty much shows that "global warming" is a major >>> fraud to create a huge energy tax, so it's doubtful that any corrections >>> are needed. >> >> If global warming is not a fact, I think it more likely disagreement in >> the scientific community.] >> >>> >>> As to what I believe is going on? I can't say. As to what YOU believe is >>> going on, I could not give a damn. But the shills certainly do. They >>> keep demanding "proof" and name-calling. >> >> As for myself, I have just requested your evidence, evidence of course >> is not proof. >> >>> It's their job. If you want >>> "proof" then dig in and do your own research. Amazon has plenty of books >>> to start. My opinion is the clowns in government are doing FAR more >>> destructive OTHER things than just spraying cities with chemicals. >> >> Could you tell us what? >> >>> And >>> they really could use some exposure. Ignore the shills. >>> >>> >> >> As I am not a 'shill' & have not worked for a government for at least 30 >> years why do you ignore my request(s)? > > Not directly working for a government doesn't mean you are not a shill. And you have no evidence that I am. > It's all about spinning facts and discrediting evidence. I have not been able to discredit your evidence, you have provided none. > Why a person > does this can be for a wide variety of reasons. In fact government make > an effort NOT to have their employees shill on the internet or elsewhere > because when they have done this they got caught and there was an uproar. There might be some truth in that. > > I know, I know, you never heard of that happening. There have been some cases when government employees have done what they should not have done on the internet. > And why don't I > provide you with chapter and verse of the "evidence" so you can debunk it? I can't debunk it or believe it if you don't provide it. > > Sorry. I"m not looking for converts. I'm not preaching gospel. So why make the post? >If you > want evidence it's out there. It's not hard to find. Pretending you need > help to find it is just not going to work. I'm sure you are right, but it was the evidence that made you believe in 'chemtrails' that I was interested in. > > You are correct, that you've been quite mild and have not called me a > kook or suggested I was insane. Others have made up for your > shortcomings, however. > > I have no influence on others, they make up their own minds. As you are going to provide any evidence of your beliefs I shall stop posting on this thread. Have a good day (or night). --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 02:40 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <ccbca3e4-51f9-4457-af4e-5a2c21a625eb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #549500 |
Tony Dragon I'm sure you are right, but it was the evidence that made you believe in 'chemtrails' that I was interested in. ------------- Hey Tony. After BJ provides the evidence for chemtrails, would you ask him why he believes in esp and ghosts as well? Thanks in advance
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 10:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <KJpry.170238$K21.149104@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #549501 |
On 01/31/2016 05:40 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Tony Dragon
> I'm sure you are right, but it was the evidence that made you believe in
> 'chemtrails' that I was interested in.
> -------------
>
> Hey Tony. After BJ provides the evidence for chemtrails, would you ask him why he believes in esp and ghosts as well?
>
> Thanks in advance
=====
I have given numerous references to the scientific work done on ESP,
Remote viewing and the like with many excellent books easily available
on Amazon.com. HVAC prefers not to read anything so as to remain
ignorant. I have referenced a number of Nobel prize-winning scientists
who have found significant ESP evidence. HVAC who thinks he is the
“moderator” of an unmoderated newsgroup thinks he's smarter than them. I
have referenced government projects costing millions verifying ESP
effects. In spite of FOIA proof, HVAC acts as if they do not exist. I
have listed PROOF BEYOND DOUBT of a government cover-up of UFO
information from the government's own documents. HVAC admits nothing.
So everybody, the ONLY thing that anonymous HVAC (whatever that is) has
going for "him" is the assertion that this or that person "believes" in
Ghosts, ESP, or the like. That's it. He has ONLY his "superpowers" to
tell you what another person has in their mind! No evidence, no records
of posts, nada. Of course such “superpowers” would be ESP, would they
not? Science is only about evidence. Religion and pseudoscience is about
"belief". HVAC has no science education and knows no science.
So the only question YOU must ask is are you interested in science or
strategic writer fantasy. Make your choice.
These paragraphs will be repeated every time HVAC accuses someone of
"believing" in something.
PS. My “superpowers” tell me HVAC is Gay and needs to come out.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 19:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <dv22oc-kij.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #549501 |
HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: > Tony Dragon > I'm sure you are right, but it was the evidence that made you believe in > 'chemtrails' that I was interested in. > ------------- > > Hey Tony. After BJ provides the evidence for chemtrails, would you ask him why he believes in esp and ghosts as well? > > Thanks in advance I get "chemtrails" off my prop tips on a humid day. Does this mean some nefarious organization has hidden an evil device inside my solid aluminum propeller? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <df3e7dbf-b2c1-4c9a-a904-cedea99722cf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #549557 |
Hey Tony. After BJ provides the evidence for chemtrails, would you ask him why he believes in esp and ghosts as well? > > Thanks in advance I get "chemtrails" off my prop tips on a humid day. Does this mean some nefarious organization has hidden an evil device inside my solid aluminum propeller? ---------- I find it an amazing coincidence that the chemtrails are never spread out over the countryside. They're always spraying along heavily used flight paths.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 03:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <WIEry.246516$8P4.225758@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #549584 |
On 01/31/2016 04:05 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Hey Tony. After BJ provides the evidence for chemtrails, would you ask him why he believes in esp and ghosts as well?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>
> I get "chemtrails" off my prop tips on a humid day.
>
> Does this mean some nefarious organization has hidden an evil device
> inside my solid aluminum propeller?
> ----------
>
> I find it an amazing coincidence that the chemtrails are never spread out over the countryside. They're always spraying along heavily used flight paths.
Lie. But since Hatlot said it it must be truth and not disinformation.
We all know that all chemists are incompetent and just perpetrate hoaxes
to be famous. But then on the other hand that is made up for by climate
scientists (especially those working for and funded by gummint) who
ALWAYS tell the truth and exist only to expose kooks who say that the
settled science isn't settled. Wormley is right on the money just like
HVAC. You can take that to the bank!
So transparent!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 03:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why Chemtrails? |
| Message-ID | <DBEry.205677$qo3.23640@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #549557 |
On 01/31/2016 02:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Tony Dragon
>> I'm sure you are right, but it was the evidence that made you believe in
>> 'chemtrails' that I was interested in.
>> -------------
>>
>> Hey Tony. After BJ provides the evidence for chemtrails, would you ask him why he believes in esp and ghosts as well?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>
> I get "chemtrails" off my prop tips on a humid day.
>
> Does this mean some nefarious organization has hidden an evil device
> inside my solid aluminum propeller?
Only if the "solid" prop is hollow with chemicals pumped down the center
HVAC thinks you can always trust government even when they are spraying
unsuspecting citizens with bacteria or slipping them dangerous drugs. I
agree with you that it's more a "nefarious organization" and from what I
see running for president now, soon to get even more "nefarious".
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web