Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.conspiracy > #274233

Re: Why Chemtrails?

From Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Why Chemtrails?
Date 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n8j4m4$s8v$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <uvdmabpmrdumb5vnsrjsfiiv3potodf7jt@4ax.com> <MPG.311549d3d327c7c098c4aa@news.giganews.com> <omtnab5dpnmam3mtkubjnbhv7vhi20bucu@4ax.com> <MPG.31169be339a231cb98c4af@news.giganews.com> <Ek6ry.169335$K21.157685@fx02.iad>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 30/01/2016 17:23, benj wrote:
> So I have made the statement that Chemtrails have been analyzed and are
> not water vapor.

Indeed you have.

> This of course set off all the shills into convulsions
> of calling "kook" and "liar" and all the rest.

If you are including me in that group, I must point out that I have not 
called you a liar or a kook.

Hang on, I can't be a 'shill' as I have called you neither.

> Doesn't matter if anyone
> believes me. But the big shill response is probably the best proof there
> is that SOMETHING is going on with Chemtrails. But what could it be?

Do tell me.

>
> Lets speculate:

No harm in that.

> Distribution of metal particles in the atmosphere over
> cities could be military experiments for the use of weather modification
> as a weapon.

That is indeed possible.

> Could be, as the military has been interested in weather
> weapons for a long time. History shows that experiments using civilian
> population is not regraded
I take it you mean regarded.

> as out of bounds by them. Which means it
> could be tests of biowarfare.


> Government has been caught spreading
> bacteria around cities as "tests" before.

I don't recall a provable instance of this.

? Or perhaps the Ozone problem
> is far worse than we think and the chemtrail materials are to reflect a
> good part of the UV radiation coming through. Makes some sense.

That again is possible, but why keep that a secret?

> Governments hate to give out bad news especially when they are to blame
> like the space shuttle chemicals destroying the ozone layer.

I take it you mean the exhaust?

> Or maybe
> it's the same idea but rather with regard to modifying "global warming".

See above.

> Could be, but science pretty much shows that "global warming" is a major
> fraud to create a huge energy tax, so it's doubtful that any corrections
> are needed.

If global warming is not a fact, I think it more likely disagreement in 
the scientific community.]

>
> As to what I believe is going on? I can't say. As to what YOU believe is
> going on, I could not give a damn. But the shills certainly do. They
> keep demanding "proof" and name-calling.

As for myself, I have just requested your evidence, evidence of course 
is not proof.

> It's their job. If you want
> "proof" then dig in and do your own research. Amazon has plenty of books
> to start. My opinion is the clowns in government are doing FAR more
> destructive OTHER things than just spraying cities with chemicals.

Could you tell us what?

> And
> they really could use some exposure. Ignore the shills.
>
>

As I am not a 'shill' & have not worked for a government for at least 30 
years why do you ignore my request(s)?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-28 12:42 -0600
  Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 11:48 -0800
    Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-01-31 13:05 -0800
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:00 -0600
  Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 03:59 -0600
    Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-29 10:05 -0500
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:33 -0600
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:08 -0500
          Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 12:23 -0500
            Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 20:01 +0000
              Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 00:03 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-31 09:25 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 05:06 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:27 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:44 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:19 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 03:25 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 05:02 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-01 18:39 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 11:02 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:26 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 19:52 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:12 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 21:13 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 16:58 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:32 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:53 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:05 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-02 01:53 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:30 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-01 14:25 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 10:51 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:31 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:01 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 03:45 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:32 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 18:45 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:59 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 15:17 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:17 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 12:39 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:23 +0000
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:31 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:36 +1100
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 15:46 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 19:37 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:51 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:50 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-03 17:22 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:22 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-02-04 01:25 -0800
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-04 10:47 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:43 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 03:29 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:54 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-02 17:26 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 00:01 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-02-03 00:41 -0500
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 04:33 -0600
                Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 21:30 -0600
              Re: Why Chemtrails? naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:31 -0800
            Re: Why Chemtrails? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:31 -0600
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 10:07 -0800
            Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:34 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:08 -0500
    Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:16 -0500
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 18:13 +0000
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:04 -0500
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 +0000
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-29 23:53 +0000
            Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:24 -0500
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 08:59 +0000
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:22 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-30 14:27 +0000
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:56 -0600
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:15 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:26 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:04 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 15:32 -0600
            Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 03:13 -0600
              Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 05:25 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:57 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 09:38 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:41 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:46 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 12:20 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:32 -0600
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-31 23:09 -0500
                Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 10:32 -0600
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 12:27 -0600
        Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:20 -0500
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:35 -0600
          Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-30 10:06 -0500
      Re: Why we know that Chemtrails have been around for 40+ years "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 17:34 -0600

csiph-web