Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #547569 > unrolled thread

Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 18:03 +0000
    Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 18:39 +0000
    Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 21:05 +0000
    Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-01-24 03:44 +0100
      Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 12:40 +0000
        Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 06:22 -0800
        Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-01-27 04:15 +0100
          Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity GogoJF <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 19:38 -0800
            Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 05:44 -0800
      Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 07:42 -0800
        Re: Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 01:50 -0500

#547569 — Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity

Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664

"However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at 
least the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this 
period."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#547582

jamesl51165 wrote:

> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich
> wrote:
>> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
>> 
>> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for
>> at least the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this
>> period."
>
> Religion knows this better. That because of God there is no dead
> universe in the future... the universe's stars and us won't ever die.
> We still have to do what we have to do Universal planetary.
> Mitchell Raemsch

Dr. Steven Greer Contact, ET & European Connection 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE01oAO8t4I

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547640

JanPB wrote:

> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 10:04:08 AM UTC-8, Lawrence Senreich
> wrote:
>> Leave Earth Before the Modern Science Destroys It
>> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664
>> 
>> "However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at
>> least the next hundred years,
> 
> Make it "never".

This pessimist am I not. Never say never, unless you are pretty sure.

> Besides, we should focus on making life good here, forget space.

No, you contradict yourself. What we need is to go back to Moon, and land 
this time softly, and build bases (under surface of Moon). Or, take over 
the Alien (or Ancient human) Bases already existent over there. The data I 
have strongly indicates that inhabitable bases already are existent on 
Moon. Anyhow, the Chinese are going to take the Moon over pretty soon, 
like it or not.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547704

Am 23.01.2016 19:03, schrieb Lawrence Senreich:


I always wondered, whether or not the things he 'speaks' actually come 
from his own brain.

Alternative possibility: he is actually 'remote controlled'  and his 
voice synthesiser 'speaks', what was written in hidden offices by 'bad 
guys'/aliens/government/whoknows.

Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair, 
if bad guys need to announce bs.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547762

Thomas Heger wrote:

> Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair,
> if bad guys need to announce bs.

Racist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547773

Each of us has their own challenges.
I could've been in a wheelchair, too.
But I figured some stuff out that
actually works.
Unlike Stephen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548470

Am 24.01.2016 13:40, schrieb Rebecca Ochsenknecht:

>> Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair,
>> if bad guys need to announce bs.
>
> Racist.

Well, 'bad guys' could be racists as well.

Actually the term 'race' is inappropriate to characterise human 
features. The word stems from agriculture and activities like horse 
breeding.


What we usually call 'race' are similarities in bodily features, that 
large ethnically related groups have in common.

E.g. Europeans, Russians, Caucasians have relatively light skin, while 
Africans have darker skin. So we call Europeans 'white' and speak of a 
'White Race'.

This is definitely not true, since the skin is more like a brownish pink.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548473

On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 9:15:27 PM UTC-6, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 24.01.2016 13:40, schrieb Rebecca Ochsenknecht:
> 
> >> Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair,
> >> if bad guys need to announce bs.
> >
> > Racist.
> 
> Well, 'bad guys' could be racists as well.
> 
> Actually the term 'race' is inappropriate to characterise human 
> features. The word stems from agriculture and activities like horse 
> breeding.
> 
> 
> What we usually call 'race' are similarities in bodily features, that 
> large ethnically related groups have in common.
> 
> E.g. Europeans, Russians, Caucasians have relatively light skin, while 
> Africans have darker skin. So we call Europeans 'white' and speak of a 
> 'White Race'.
> 
> This is definitely not true, since the skin is more like a brownish pink.
> 
> 
> TH

Steinbeck said all the breeds will eventually blend into one color.  Boy, I sure hope not- not because I'm a racist- but because I believe in hybrid vigor.  I believe that the more pure breeds we have- the more definitive our life and meaning will be. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548525

You know that "breeding pure"
just means that both alleles at any one
spot on the double-stranded chromosome 
are the same, do you not?
They could both code for HVACism, and then
what? A SECOND pox on our world!!

Hybrid vigor is the first cross of
two purebreds. This means that any nasty
recessive doubles will likely be split up,
and there will be a good allele at that locus.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547787

I always wondered, whether or not the things he 'speaks' actually come 
from his own brain. 

Alternative possibility: he is actually 'remote controlled'  and his 
voice synthesiser 'speaks', what was written in hidden offices by 'bad 
guys'/aliens/government/whoknows. 

Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair, 
if bad guys need to announce
------------

100% correct you are.

Hawking is little more than a puppet these days and actually had been for more than a decade.

Brilliant mind that has been let down by his body. Also most truly innovative people lose their fast ball at age 30.

Why this is is a great question. I think it's because of the sublimation of creativity due to exposure to 'normal' thinking patterns. 

And it's not just physics and other hard sciences that show this. Take a look/listen to great music and bands. You don't see much innovation from those over 30.

Just ask all the under 30's here.... Oh wait. There aren't any

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547940

On 01/24/2016 10:42 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
> I always wondered, whether or not the things he 'speaks' actually come
> from his own brain.
>
> Alternative possibility: he is actually 'remote controlled'  and his
> voice synthesiser 'speaks', what was written in hidden offices by 'bad
> guys'/aliens/government/whoknows.
>
> Possibly he is only a puppet and gets driven around in his wheel chair,
> if bad guys need to announce
> ------------
>
> 100% correct you are.
>
> Hawking is little more than a puppet these days and actually had been for more than a decade.
>
> Brilliant mind that has been let down by his body. Also most truly innovative people lose their fast ball at age 30.
>
> Why this is is a great question. I think it's because of the sublimation of creativity due to exposure to 'normal' thinking patterns.
>
> And it's not just physics and other hard sciences that show this. Take a look/listen to great music and bands. You don't see much innovation from those over 30.
>
> Just ask all the under 30's here.... Oh wait. There aren't any
>
Note HVAC is retired. No great ideas there. Not even factual ideas.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web