Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #546306 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-18 12:45 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-01-26 10:44 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 130 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 12:45 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-18 16:38 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 10:31 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-18 23:01 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:48 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 23:01 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:08 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 05:42 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 08:23 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:23 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:37 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:53 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:07 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:05 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:29 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:41 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 12:02 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:36 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-23 13:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 09:11 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 11:50 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:37 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:16 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:24 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 08:36 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 14:20 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:35 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 09:51 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 11:55 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:39 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:40 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:46 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:05 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:03 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:04 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:15 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:31 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:52 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 11:33 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:39 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 12:04 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:43 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:31 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:28 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:46 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:33 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 20:00 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 01:08 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:22 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 11:14 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:45 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 11:40 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 17:34 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 13:03 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 14:28 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:28 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:32 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:55 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:29 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 07:01 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 10:02 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:05 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 11:16 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:48 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:39 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 12:00 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:40 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:22 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:10 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:31 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:00 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:10 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:11 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:24 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:22 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 13:05 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:20 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:26 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:31 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 12:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:52 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-22 18:59 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:08 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:35 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 20:54 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 13:28 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 08:33 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 08:48 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:27 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:49 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 12:27 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:29 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 15:54 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-25 20:12 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 13:03 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:09 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:33 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:54 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 18:29 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 13:42 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:11 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:13 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 00:35 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 07:38 -0600
Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 04:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:09 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-19 16:44 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:26 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 07:41 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 13:41 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 19:34 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 16:33 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:36 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 04:12 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:25 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 14:31 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-26 04:46 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 21:53 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:31 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:44 -0600
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 16:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n82qg6$79c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #547760 |
Dne 24/01/2016 v 13:27 Rebecca Ochsenknecht napsal(a): > Poutnik wrote: > >>>>> Does not matter the temperature and pressure, but the saturation of >>>>> the surrounding environment, say air. If the humidity is 100% then no >>>>> evaporations takes place. Otherwise always. >>>>> >>>> It is not related to environment saturation. >>>> It is not attribute of air, but of water itself. >>> >>> So you mean that humidity can go above those 100%. >> >> If there is maintained equilibrium between liquid and gaseous phase, >> the relative humidity does not go above 100%. > > Otherwise it will? I can see you are not afraid of being called stupid. Go > back and do research in sci.physics.research, a place where nobody ever > will call you stupid. > Otherwise it can and it does so, as used routinely if fog chambers of particle physics. Being stupid stays with you, along with your name shifting. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-24 15:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n82s2q$1jjj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #547785 |
Poutnik wrote: >> Otherwise it will? I can see you are not afraid of being called stupid. >> Go back and do research in sci.physics.research, a place where nobody >> ever will call you stupid. > > Otherwise it can and it does so, as used routinely if fog chambers of > particle physics. Will your wet clothes still by drying in 100% humidity? Yes?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-25 20:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n85s37$4vf$3@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #547760 |
On 24.01.2016 13:27, Rebecca Ochsenknecht wrote: > [] It doesn't help to change your name, the trolling idiot is recognized anyway. plonk -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 13:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n7tugv$1erl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #547254 |
On 1/22/2016 12:52 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 10:43:38 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: >>> At what temperature does water turn to gas? >> >> at what pressure? > > I'll leave that up to you. > I understand you do not believe in "pressure", it is obvious in what you post. You missed out on "density" as well. With these two fundamental metrics missing from your background, and from your posts/blogs, no wonder your theories are simple, and self-disproving. Any scientist knows "density" and "pressure". wiki "pressure cooker" tires have "pressure" in them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 11:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a7036131-38e0-444c-b830-95efc8e8b86c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #547271 |
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 11:05:09 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > I understand you do not believe in "pressure", I do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 14:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n7u3p8$1u2n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #547276 |
On 1/22/2016 1:09 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 11:05:09 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > >> I understand you do not believe in "pressure", > > I do. > you have never mentioned "pressure" before in your posts or writing. is that a parameter in you theories ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 12:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0c973c5c-64e0-4fc9-b9ea-810d63db214b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #547295 |
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 12:34:56 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > On 1/22/2016 1:09 PM, James McGinn wrote: > > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 11:05:09 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > > > >> I understand you do not believe in "pressure", > > > > I do. > > > > you have never mentioned "pressure" before in your posts or writing. > is that a parameter in you theories ? implicity, yes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 18:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <14e7fdaa-1b2e-40cd-903d-3654c2fd76f5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #547203 |
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 8:18:52 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > What do you think the term, "gaseous phase," means? > > At what temperature does water turn to gas? > > At what temperature does evaporation generally take place? Okay. Here are the answers: Gaseous means the individual water molecules are not bonded to each other. Each molecule of H2O in gaseous H2O is independent. Water only becomes a gas above boiling temperature/pressure of H2O, 100C 212F at 1 ATM, as clearly indicated in steam tables. There is no place in Earth's atmosphere where the temperature is hot enough or the pressure is low enough to produce gaseous H2O. Consequently there is zero gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere, it is all evaporate (vapor). One common misconception is that moist air that is clear is gaseous. This isn't true. Again, there is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere, it is all evaporate (vapor). The reason it is often invisible is because H2O's unusually high surface tension allow it to form into droplet/clusters that are so small they are invisible. Evaporation (and/or sublimation). Can take place anywhere from 99 degrees Celsius all the way down to its triple point temperature, which is very low. But evaporation does not produce gaseous H2O, as described above it produces evaporate (vapor).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 13:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7Kuoy.187377$8V1.167901@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #547173 |
On 01/22/2016 08:42 AM, HVAC wrote:
> I think professor Wormley should post an article on the difference between evaporation and boiling.
>
> There is obviously much confusion on this subject.
>
> I would do it myself except for 2 reasons.
>
> 1) I am a poor instructor and often resort to threats of violence
>
> 2) I am lazy as fuck
Forgot 3) I am dumb as box of hammers and haven't a clue about science.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 08:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n7tdbb$1u64$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #547141 |
On 1/22/2016 1:01 AM, James McGinn wrote: > Water is a subject in which almost everybody (accept me) is, in one way or anotehr, > deeply confused. The vast majority of people are confused into thinking it is a lot > simpler than it really is. Jim, I know you don't like it when people stop talking about your ideas and start talking about you. You are lonely and want engagement, which would give you some feelings of validation that your ideas are worth attention. Some people politely give you a little of that. But the real problem is not your ideas, which are easily dismantled with basic facts, but instead is you and a few key personality issues. The good news is that you have control over your personality issues and can fix that. When that happens, then your steadfast clinging to broken ideas will also likely resolve itself. Change is hard, but I know you can do it. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 09:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n7so6h$sje$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #547115 |
Dne 22/01/2016 v 04:48 Ross A. Finlayson napsal(a): > > Cold steam? > When one is breathing the cold air, the steam being created from moist and warm aire leaving the mouth is quite cold. Clouds but the ones in upper troposhere are cold steam based. But for cold steam to appear, first saturated pressure of water vapours must be reached ( can appear earlier in salt condensation core presence ). -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 00:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <87a335eb-9878-49ea-a959-d5cbbbf6840d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #547147 |
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 12:13:47 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 22/01/2016 v 04:48 Ross A. Finlayson napsal(a): > > > > Cold steam? > > > When one is breathing the cold air, > the steam being created > from moist and warm aire leaving the mouth > is quite cold. > > Clouds but the ones in upper troposhere > are cold steam based. > > But for cold steam to appear, > first saturated pressure of water vapours > must be reached ( can appear earlier > in salt condensation core presence ). What is steam to you? What is vapor to you? What criteria do you use to distinguish between them?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 07:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n7tbfc$1qkn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #547148 |
On 1/22/2016 2:35 AM, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 12:13:47 AM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote: >> Dne 22/01/2016 v 04:48 Ross A. Finlayson napsal(a): >>> >>> Cold steam? >>> >> When one is breathing the cold air, the steam being created from >> moist and warm aire leaving the mouth is quite cold. >> Clouds but the ones in upper troposhere are cold steam based. >> >> But for cold steam to appear, first saturated pressure of water >> vapours must be reached ( can appear earlier in salt condensation >> core presence ). > > What is steam to you? What is vapor to you? What criteria do you > use to distinguish between them? > Cold steam is fog. hot steam is used for railroad engines, vapor is used in global worming. steam is used for cooking vegatables, and vapors is what women got in the 19th century. steam is hot then cold, unless it is fog, then it is cold, and vapor warm then cold, unless it is cold, then it can turn wormer Fog is cold steam, vapor is mostly invisable to human eyes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 04:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <71f1020f-df51-43c7-95c7-d4b22d13aa33@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #546306 |
Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" ------------- Cold steam = Water
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 18:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Cmzny.178840$xz4.148493@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #546454 |
On 01/19/2016 07:18 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam"
> -------------
>
> Cold steam = Water
>
water = "heavy air"
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-19 16:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <n7ml5g$qbn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #546575 |
"benj" <none@gmail.com> wrote: > A Doppelganger of Swine Glazier, the Cretin, wrote: >> Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" >> hanson wrote: His 1-liner doesn't define neither "Cold" nor "Steam" >> Harlow Campbell HVAC wrote: >> Cold steam = Water >> hanson wrote: Harlow, if you must then better go with "Fog" or "Clouds". > "benj" wrote: > water = "heavy air" > hamson wrote: Ben, it is painful to see that ever since Full-Swine Glazier did shit into your "Kisser", Swine Glazier's excrements have affected your brain, .... deleteriously.... Pity! Pity, but thanks for the laughs... ahahahahahahanson > > PS: Ben, for your benefit and recuperation, see below how your damaged from his Glazierola occurred. It can be seen really from the moment on when <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2" :B::ert Glazier, the hate-mongering Full-Swine, introduces himself as/with > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert. :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement". :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob. :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > about which .... Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka "Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote: > "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking moron who ever came down the Mass Pike. "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)" "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker". "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?" "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet." "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck". "Bert, your opinion doesn't count" "Bert you are an idiot." "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head. "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert" "Bert, you should be arrested" "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your van seems to be a center for drug activity in the Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which.... > Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can. Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse than the man's on the street. Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage. reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave . reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me. reber, you don't believe in science. Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup. Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__. Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!.. > Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit... You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself. > Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote: GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT! Saul Levy > Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote: Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way. > benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized. But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier, but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is! Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"... > hanson wrote: So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works, ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier? > Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies? Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man? He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"... <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D] BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal Graveyard Vandal who wrote: > (1) On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in: https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert. > Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which Glazier proudly announced & posted... > (2) On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser. Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which... > Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier threatened... > (3) On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote: Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert. > (4) The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel- movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__. who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice legs"... > hanson wrote: So, Glazier you Transie-Swine, do know that as soon as you have been "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your legacy, is because: > Glazier the Swine fortunately posted: .... "hanson made me famous".... > hanson wrote So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since it is only because of hanson that Web searches show for: > --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising > cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 19:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5cc7e1e5-a477-425f-8b04-11580cd91c87@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #546615 |
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-8, hanson wrote: > "benj" <none@gmail.com> wrote: > > > A Doppelganger of Swine Glazier, the Cretin, wrote: > >> Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" > >> > hanson wrote: > His 1-liner doesn't define neither "Cold" nor "Steam" > >> > Harlow Campbell HVAC wrote: > >> Cold steam = Water > >> > hanson wrote: > Harlow, if you must then better go with "Fog" or "Clouds". > > > "benj" wrote: > > water = "heavy air" > > > hamson wrote: > Ben, it is painful to see that ever since Full-Swine Glazier > did shit into your "Kisser", Swine Glazier's excrements > have affected your brain, .... deleteriously.... Pity! > Pity, but thanks for the laughs... ahahahahahahanson > > > > > PS: > Ben, for your benefit and recuperation, see below how your > damaged from his Glazierola occurred. It can be seen really > from the moment on when <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> > "reber g=emc^2" :B::ert Glazier, the hate-mongering Full-Swine, > introduces himself as/with > > > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & > :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." > :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert > :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. > :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that > :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face > :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". > :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert. > :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement". > :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" > :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert > :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and > :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... > :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together > :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody > :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his > :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a > :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob. > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > about which .... > Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka > "Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote: > > > "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking > moron who ever came down the Mass Pike. > "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human > fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)" > "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker". > "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?" > "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet." > "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get > some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck". > "Bert, your opinion doesn't count" > "Bert you are an idiot." > "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert > you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head. > "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert" > "Bert, you should be arrested" > "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your > van seems to be a center for drug activity in the > Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which.... > > > Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can. > Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse > than the man's on the street. > Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage. > reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave . > reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me. > reber, you don't believe in science. > Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup. > Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__. > Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!.. > > > Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit... > You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself. > > > Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote: > GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT! > Saul Levy > > > Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote: > Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy > or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way. > > > benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized. > But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier, > but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is! > Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"... > > > hanson wrote: > So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and > your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works, > ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year > old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's > Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier? > > > Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies? > Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man? > He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"... > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D] > BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans > which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the > ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal > Graveyard Vandal who wrote: > > > (1) > On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in: > https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J > Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh > when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert. > > > Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic > alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile > IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which > Glazier proudly announced & posted... > > > (2) > On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier > said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: > Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. > For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser. > Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which... > > > Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even > worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier > widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier > threatened... > > > (3) > On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote: > Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net > & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face > to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert. > > > (4) > The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected > to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier > labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel- > movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__. > who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons > female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice > legs"... > > > hanson wrote: > So, Glazier you Transie-Swine, do know that as soon as you > have been "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR > posts from the USENET and the only thing that will remain and > show your legacy, is because: > > > Glazier the Swine fortunately posted: > .... "hanson made me famous".... > > > hanson wrote > So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish > me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since > it is only because of hanson that Web searches show for: > > > --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising > --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising > > > cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed > <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental > cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom! Oki doki
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 07:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n7tbkv$1qkn$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #547111 |
On 1/21/2016 9:26 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-8, hanson wrote: >> "benj" <none@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> A Doppelganger of Swine Glazier, the Cretin, wrote: >>>> Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" >> hanson wrote: >> His 1-liner doesn't define neither "Cold" nor "Steam" >>>> >> Harlow Campbell HVAC wrote: >>>> Cold steam = Water >>>> >> hanson wrote: >> Harlow, if you must then better go with "Fog" or "Clouds". >>> >> "benj" wrote: >>> water = "heavy air" >> hanson wrote >> So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish >> me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since >> it is only because of hanson that Web searches show for: >>> >> --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising >> --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising >> cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed >> <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental >> cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom! > > Oki doki > trying to keep your troll OP at the top of the heap, Soilient Tomatoes ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-23 13:41 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dgg7j5Fc6kdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #546306 |
On 19/01/2016 7:45 AM, James McGinn wrote: > > Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" What is this? Some kind of idée fixe? It's all about a dynamic equilibrium between liquid water and its vapour. I suspect it was you who managed to post to the moderated group sci.physics.research, and had this explained to you. So drop it. You're wrong. That's all. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-22 19:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <446f06d2-af6c-4b3e-bbcc-60cf7f01248f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #547386 |
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:41:46 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote: > It's all about a dynamic equilibrium between liquid water and its > vapour. Uh, . . . er . . . uh . . . dynamic . . . uh . . . equi . . . I suspect it was you who managed to post to the moderated group > sci.physics.research, and had this explained to you. Yer like, one of dem smart peeples that noes dem big words. Dang golly I wiss I wuz more smarter lyke yiew.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web