Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #547111
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-21 19:26 -0800 |
| References | <7e3d2d26-9620-4e58-a369-9d07960786b8@googlegroups.com> <71f1020f-df51-43c7-95c7-d4b22d13aa33@googlegroups.com> <Cmzny.178840$xz4.148493@fx12.iad> <n7ml5g$qbn$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <5cc7e1e5-a477-425f-8b04-11580cd91c87@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" |
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 4:45:14 PM UTC-8, hanson wrote: > "benj" <none@gmail.com> wrote: > > > A Doppelganger of Swine Glazier, the Cretin, wrote: > >> Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" > >> > hanson wrote: > His 1-liner doesn't define neither "Cold" nor "Steam" > >> > Harlow Campbell HVAC wrote: > >> Cold steam = Water > >> > hanson wrote: > Harlow, if you must then better go with "Fog" or "Clouds". > > > "benj" wrote: > > water = "heavy air" > > > hamson wrote: > Ben, it is painful to see that ever since Full-Swine Glazier > did shit into your "Kisser", Swine Glazier's excrements > have affected your brain, .... deleteriously.... Pity! > Pity, but thanks for the laughs... ahahahahahahanson > > > > > PS: > Ben, for your benefit and recuperation, see below how your > damaged from his Glazierola occurred. It can be seen really > from the moment on when <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> > "reber g=emc^2" :B::ert Glazier, the hate-mongering Full-Swine, > introduces himself as/with > > > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & > :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." > :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert > :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. > :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that > :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face > :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". > :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert. > :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement". > :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" > :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert > :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and > :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... > :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together > :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody > :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his > :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a > :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob. > :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > > > about which .... > Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka > "Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote: > > > "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking > moron who ever came down the Mass Pike. > "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human > fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)" > "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker". > "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?" > "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet." > "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get > some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck". > "Bert, your opinion doesn't count" > "Bert you are an idiot." > "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert > you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head. > "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert" > "Bert, you should be arrested" > "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your > van seems to be a center for drug activity in the > Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which.... > > > Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can. > Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse > than the man's on the street. > Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage. > reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave . > reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me. > reber, you don't believe in science. > Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup. > Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__. > Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!.. > > > Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit... > You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself. > > > Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote: > GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT! > Saul Levy > > > Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote: > Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy > or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way. > > > benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized. > But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier, > but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is! > Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"... > > > hanson wrote: > So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and > your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works, > ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year > old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's > Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier? > > > Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies? > Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man? > He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"... > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D] > BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans > which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the > ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal > Graveyard Vandal who wrote: > > > (1) > On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in: > https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J > Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh > when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert. > > > Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic > alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile > IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which > Glazier proudly announced & posted... > > > (2) > On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier > said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: > Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. > For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser. > Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which... > > > Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even > worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier > widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier > threatened... > > > (3) > On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote: > Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net > & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face > to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert. > > > (4) > The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected > to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier > labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel- > movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__. > who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons > female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice > legs"... > > > hanson wrote: > So, Glazier you Transie-Swine, do know that as soon as you > have been "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR > posts from the USENET and the only thing that will remain and > show your legacy, is because: > > > Glazier the Swine fortunately posted: > .... "hanson made me famous".... > > > hanson wrote > So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish > me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since > it is only because of hanson that Web searches show for: > > > --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising > --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising > > > cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed > <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental > cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom! Oki doki
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 12:45 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-18 16:38 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 10:31 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-18 23:01 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:48 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 23:01 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:08 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 05:42 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 08:23 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:23 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:37 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:53 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:07 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:05 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:29 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:41 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 12:02 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:36 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-23 13:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 09:11 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 11:50 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:37 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:16 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:24 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 08:36 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 14:20 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:35 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 09:51 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 11:55 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:39 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:40 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:46 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:05 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:03 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:04 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:15 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:31 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:52 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 11:33 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:39 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 12:04 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:43 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:31 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:28 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:46 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:33 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 20:00 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 01:08 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:22 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 11:14 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:45 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 11:40 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 17:34 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 13:03 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 14:28 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:28 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:32 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:55 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:29 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 07:01 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 10:02 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:05 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 11:16 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:48 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:39 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" claudiusdenk@gmail.com - 2016-01-25 12:00 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:40 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 15:22 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:10 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:31 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:00 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:10 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:11 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 10:24 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:22 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 13:05 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 18:20 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:26 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:31 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 12:42 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:52 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-22 18:59 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:08 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:35 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 20:54 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-23 13:28 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 08:33 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 08:48 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:27 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-25 10:49 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 12:27 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:29 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Rebecca Ochsenknecht <rebeoch@stritzelhassel.net> - 2016-01-24 15:54 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-25 20:12 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 13:03 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:09 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 14:33 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:54 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 18:29 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 13:42 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:11 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:13 +0100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 00:35 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 07:38 -0600
Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 04:18 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:09 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-19 16:44 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 19:26 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 07:41 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 13:41 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 19:34 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 16:33 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:36 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 04:12 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:25 -0500
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-26 14:31 +1100
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-26 04:46 +0000
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 21:53 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:31 -0600
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-26 10:44 -0600
csiph-web