Groups > sci.physics > #554746 > unrolled thread

Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

Started by	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post	2016-02-19 16:34 -0800
Last post	2016-02-21 18:31 +0000
Articles	20 on this page of 102 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →

#555060

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-02-20 12:26 -0800
Message-ID	<f150008f-c92b-427b-bfa3-206fce1c5509@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555050

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:20:03 PM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:
> Dne 20/02/2016 v 21:13 pnal...@gmail.com napsal(a):

> > I don't need to look it up, I know what it says. Why are you ducking the question? Are you afraid that it will lead to your loss of faced? I think so...
> > 
> 
> It is his usual tactic,
> when directly questioned about his particular knowledge,
> distracting from the fact he has no clue.
 
> You are wasting your time on him.

Yes, I know... aren't we all?

\Paul A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555066

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 21:28 +0100
Message-ID	<naai4g$grp$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#555060

Dne 20/02/2016 v 21:26 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a):
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:20:03 PM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:
>> Dne 20/02/2016 v 21:13 pnal...@gmail.com napsal(a):
> 
>>> I don't need to look it up, I know what it says. Why are you ducking the question? Are you afraid that it will lead to your loss of faced? I think so...
>>>
>>
>> It is his usual tactic,
>> when directly questioned about his particular knowledge,
>> distracting from the fact he has no clue.
>  
>> You are wasting your time on him.
> 
> Yes, I know... aren't we all?
> 
Yes, each in his time,
until the realization comes...

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555076

From	Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
Message-ID	<18a77a24-fd39-4d53-9cbb-07364bbb3ada@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555060

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:26:40 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:

> Yes, I know... aren't we all?

I agree.  You failed to contradict the claim in the subject heading of this thread.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555086

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-02-20 12:51 -0800
Message-ID	<ff47005e-a499-486d-a4c8-3ca2e1d26c1f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555076

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:33:22 PM UTC-8, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:26:40 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I know... aren't we all?
> 
> I agree.  You failed to contradict the claim in the subject heading of this thread.

You agree? The original quote was...

"It is his usual tactic, 
when directly questioned about his particular knowledge, 
distracting from the fact he has no clue. 

You are wasting your time on him."

And yet, YOU AGREE!

Perfect!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555062

From	Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 12:27 -0800
Message-ID	<fb59972d-a181-4ac7-9ec1-2d06ba378e04@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555046

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:13:56 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:00:13 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 
> > 
> > > Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
> > 
> > Look it up.
> > 
> > Convection Versus Plasma
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
> 
> I don't need to look it up, I know what it says. Why are you ducking the question? Are you afraid that it will lead to your loss of faced? I think so...

LOL.  You got nothing.  I knew it!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555085

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-02-20 12:48 -0800
Message-ID	<a1388fce-8fb0-4029-81c3-c90ea7ed455d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555062

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:27:19 PM UTC-8, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:13:56 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:00:13 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 
> > > 
> > > > Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
> > > 
> > > Look it up.
> > > 
> > > Convection Versus Plasma
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
> > 
> > I don't need to look it up, I know what it says. Why are you ducking the question? Are you afraid that it will lead to your loss of faced? I think so...
> 
> LOL.  You got nothing.  I knew it!!!!

Run away, little man, as fast as you can... as anyone can plainly see...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555096

From	Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 13:10 -0800
Message-ID	<4919a999-afae-4d93-b6b9-c31f98704390@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555085

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:48:51 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:


> Run away, little man, as fast as you can... as anyone can plainly see...

Everybody can see that you are the one running through this whole thread.  

You failed.  Accept it.  Move on.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555107

From	Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 13:42 -0800
Message-ID	<2c7d04e6-c9ad-41d9-b13c-ad1417e407ea@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555096

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 1:10:57 PM UTC-8, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:48:51 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> > Run away, little man, as fast as you can... as anyone can plainly see...
> 
> Everybody can see that you are the one running through this whole thread.  
> 
> You failed.  Accept it.  Move on.

Note that if my claim was incorrect, somebody would have shown the data.  And the discussion would have been over.  

The fact remains:
Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555126

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-02-20 17:03 -0600
Message-ID	<naarcv$1am6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#555107

On 2/20/2016 3:42 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 1:10:57 PM UTC-8, Solving Tornadoes
> wrote:
>> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:48:51 PM UTC-8,
>> pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>

>>> Run away, little man, as fast as you can... as anyone can plainly
>>> see...
>>
>> Everybody can see that you are the one running through this whole
>> thread.
>>
>> You failed.  Accept it.  Move on.
>
> Note that if my claim was incorrect, somebody would have shown the
> data.

no need to show data, as you have never shown data.
and therefore your "claim" is complete bullshit.


  >
> The fact remains: Meteorologists have never actually measured the
> comparative weight of moist air.

liar.  prove it.  prove ALL meterologists have NEVER measured...

we are waiting.......

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554798

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 18:14 -0800
Message-ID	<91563603-00db-42e1-8756-bca2dacbd175@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554754

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 

> Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.

It's not that difficult of a concept.  You should have had an answer by now? 

What do you think the problem is, Jim?

Show us your math.  Go ahead.  We won't bite.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555049

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-02-20 12:19 -0800
Message-ID	<27608dfb-f8aa-4f74-99c0-2a00ee97b01e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554798

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 6:15:02 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 
> 
> > Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
> 
> It's not that difficult of a concept.  You should have had an answer by now? 
> 
> What do you think the problem is, Jim?
> 
> Show us your math.  Go ahead.  We won't bite.

Uhhh.. just who is Jim?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555077

From	Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 12:33 -0800
Message-ID	<d627b28f-6063-4e14-869d-0f9bd1caa9d8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#555049

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:19:59 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 6:15:02 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com 
> > 
> > > Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
> > 
> > It's not that difficult of a concept.  You should have had an answer by now? 
> > 
> > What do you think the problem is, Jim?
> > 
> > Show us your math.  Go ahead.  We won't bite.
> 
> Uhhh.. just who is Jim?

You failed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555127

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-02-20 17:04 -0600
Message-ID	<naared$1am6$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#555077

On 2/20/2016 2:33 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 12:19:59 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 6:15:02 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
>>>
>>> It's not that difficult of a concept.  You should have had an answer by now?
>>>
>>> What do you think the problem is, Jim?
>>>
>>> Show us your math.  Go ahead.  We won't bite.
>>
>> Uhhh.. just who is Jim?
>
> You failed.
>

no, he passed with a B+, but you got an F- .

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554820

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 20:45 -0800
Message-ID	<c45335f9-d05e-412f-a8cf-f36d0ac9cb67@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554754

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:48:48 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:34:27 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > Why do you think that is?
> > 
> > I know why:
> > 
> > Wizard of Oz and the Discovery of Atmospheric Plasma
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl-GOPq8aA0
> > 
> > Why Meteorologists Maintain Dumb Explanations
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-1p1rJp1x4
> > 
> > H2O Surface Tension and Tornadoes
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7zT-26BYQ
> > 
> > How Non-Newtonian Fluids Reveal the Mechanism Underlying Ice
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6vPdAo78rU
> > 
> > Surface Tension, Jet Streams, Storms and the Twisted Truth of Meteorology
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6GZEn7N7Ss
> > 
> > Convection Versus Plasma
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
> > 
> > Impact of Polarity Neutralization on the Water Sciences
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSGv08Rb_Lo
> > 
> > Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw
> 
> Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.

C'mon Jim.  Hurry up  You got everything you need.  The math is simple. Go ahead.  What are you waiting for?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555128

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-02-20 17:05 -0600
Message-ID	<naarh2$1am6$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#554820








































































































































                             <snip crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554874

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-20 09:28 +0100
Message-ID	<na97ts$6eg$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#554754

Dne 20/02/2016 v 01:48 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a):
> On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 4:34:27 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> Why do you think that is?
>>
>> I know why:
>>
>> Wizard of Oz and the Discovery of Atmospheric Plasma
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl-GOPq8aA0
>>
>> Why Meteorologists Maintain Dumb Explanations
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-1p1rJp1x4
>>
>> H2O Surface Tension and Tornadoes
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7zT-26BYQ
>>
>> How Non-Newtonian Fluids Reveal the Mechanism Underlying Ice
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6vPdAo78rU
>>
>> Surface Tension, Jet Streams, Storms and the Twisted Truth of Meteorology
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6GZEn7N7Ss
>>
>> Convection Versus Plasma
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
>>
>> Impact of Polarity Neutralization on the Water Sciences
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSGv08Rb_Lo
>>
>> Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw
> 
> Tell us about Avogadro's Law, and why it is, or is not, important in this discussion... if you dare.
> 
Do not waste your time throwing pearls to swines with a piggy language.
They will spoil your cloth by mud of their pseudoscience.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554762

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-02-19 19:04 -0600
Message-ID	<na8e3h$1o5a$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#554746

On 2/19/2016 6:34 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>
> Why do you think that is?
>

Why that's some dude outside filming himself talkin to nobody.


Here is a better one;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGJ2jMZ-gaI

check at 2:15 for the finished piece


bigger one here, 52 kg!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_jHGQRvAts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554763

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-02-19 19:06 -0600
Message-ID	<na8e7d$1o5a$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#554762

On 2/19/2016 7:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 2/19/2016 6:34 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>>
>> Why do you think that is?
>>
>
> Why that's some dude outside filming himself talkin to nobody.
>
>
> Here is a better one;
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGJ2jMZ-gaI
>
> check at 2:15 for the finished piece
>
>
> bigger one here, 52 kg!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_jHGQRvAts


this one is over 200 kg !!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vxQNO-gBiU

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554786

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-02-20 01:33 +0000
Message-ID	<dcskpc-op8.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#554746

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Why do you think that is?

Your delusions.

> I know why:

Oh look, kook videos.

> Wizard of Oz and the Discovery of Atmospheric Plasma
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl-GOPq8aA0
> 
> Why Meteorologists Maintain Dumb Explanations
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-1p1rJp1x4
> 
> H2O Surface Tension and Tornadoes
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7zT-26BYQ
> 
> How Non-Newtonian Fluids Reveal the Mechanism Underlying Ice
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6vPdAo78rU
> 
> Surface Tension, Jet Streams, Storms and the Twisted Truth of Meteorology
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6GZEn7N7Ss
> 
> Convection Versus Plasma
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
> 
> Impact of Polarity Neutralization on the Water Sciences
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSGv08Rb_Lo
> 
> Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw

The only time there is plasma in the atmosphere is during a lightning
stroke and when crap from space burns up on entry.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554793

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-02-19 17:56 -0800
Message-ID	<cc32cb55-cd7e-4a6b-8aa7-59ae7f3013e4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#554786

On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 5:46:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Why do you think that is?
> 
> Your delusions.
> 
> > I know why:
> 
> Oh look, kook videos.
> 
> > Wizard of Oz and the Discovery of Atmospheric Plasma
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl-GOPq8aA0
> > 
> > Why Meteorologists Maintain Dumb Explanations
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-1p1rJp1x4
> > 
> > H2O Surface Tension and Tornadoes
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7zT-26BYQ
> > 
> > How Non-Newtonian Fluids Reveal the Mechanism Underlying Ice
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6vPdAo78rU
> > 
> > Surface Tension, Jet Streams, Storms and the Twisted Truth of Meteorology
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6GZEn7N7Ss
> > 
> > Convection Versus Plasma
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk
> > 
> > Impact of Polarity Neutralization on the Water Sciences
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSGv08Rb_Lo
> > 
> > Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw
> 
> The only time there is plasma in the atmosphere is during a lightning
> stroke and when crap from space burns up on entry.

Is that your argument?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →

csiph-web

Meteorologists have never actually measured the comparative weight of moist air.

Contents

#555060

#555066

#555076

#555086

#555062

#555085

#555096

#555107

#555126

#554798

#555049

#555077

#555127

#554820

#555128

#554874

#554762

#554763

#554786

#554793