Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #512700 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 347 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 09:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-11 10:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 13:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-11 23:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 00:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-11 13:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 20:57 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 15:26 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-12 17:49 -0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-13 00:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-12 19:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 15:56 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 14:20 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:39 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 23:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:46 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:15 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 00:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:22 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-17 10:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 06:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:35 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 12:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:10 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 14:29 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-16 15:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 10:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 11:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-19 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-20 14:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-22 14:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-23 10:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-24 17:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-25 16:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-26 00:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 10:45 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 07:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 19:53 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 14:58 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:52 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 19:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 18:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:41 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 05:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:26 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:17 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 17:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-24 23:40 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-26 07:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-28 11:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:27 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 01:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 05:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 10:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 08:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 22:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-31 10:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-01 01:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 12:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-31 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-09-01 02:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-31 05:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-02 12:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 23:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-02 21:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 21:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 13:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 22:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 14:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 00:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-08 00:17 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 00:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-08 22:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-30 10:07 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 22:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-18 18:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:21 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:40 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 23:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:12 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:45 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:43 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-13 15:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:08 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 04:50 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-14 12:53 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-14 06:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-14 14:16 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mike M <mike@xenocyte.com> - 2015-08-15 06:41 +0000
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 03:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:48 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-15 07:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-15 12:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 00:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 01:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 14:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:37 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-16 21:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 02:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-18 14:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 05:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 18:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 10:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 00:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-19 09:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 00:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-21 13:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 00:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-22 12:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 05:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-24 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-26 00:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-16 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 06:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 20:16 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-17 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:51 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 07:55 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-19 04:48 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-19 20:59 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-20 05:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:30 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 04:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-21 19:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-21 17:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:47 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-22 03:40 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 03:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-23 21:20 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-23 17:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-24 23:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-24 20:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-26 08:02 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 03:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:44 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-26 16:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-27 16:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-27 16:47 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-28 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-28 07:44 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-28 10:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-29 05:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-28 11:04 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-28 09:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-17 22:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 03:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-18 00:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-18 16:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-15 15:17 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:31 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-15 12:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:36 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 03:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 10:58 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 19:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:33 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:34 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:36 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-08-13 13:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 13:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 01:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:24 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-16 10:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:01 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 16:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:11 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-17 13:39 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-18 11:55 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-18 01:10 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-17 14:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:08 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-12 20:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 15:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-12 07:29 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 16:00 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 07:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:49 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:18 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-14 03:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. niunian <niunian@ymail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:25 +0800
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-15 05:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 12:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 19:30 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 04:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-12 12:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 20:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-12 10:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-11 21:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@charter.net> - 2015-08-11 20:22 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-11 21:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 14:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-11 14:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2015-08-12 12:35 +0800
Page 9 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 18 Next page →
| From | Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 22:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mr0csj$k35$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514993 |
niunian wrote: > Attila wrote: > >> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. As far back as can be found, a small percentage of the population has had direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. As far back as can be found, a large percentage of the poulation has no direct observation of the spirits of the world. So there's no surprise that any one individual does not detect them. > I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same > way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The > spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. Yet no instrument has ever detected the spirits of the world, either. As such that direct personal observation does not constitute "evidence". Until some such instrument is invented, if ever, the matter of direct personal observeration that is the starting point of all religion remains outside of the realm of science. To the extent no one tries to impose their observations on others - Ooops there for a small number of very large population religions. To the extent no one claims that the existence of their deity can be proved by science - Ooops there for one specific very large population religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 08:48 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mr0jm5$7pf$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #515132 |
On 2015-08-19 06:51 AM, Doug Freyburger wrote: > niunian wrote: >> Attila wrote: >> >>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. > > As far back as can be found, a small percentage of the population has > had direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. It's not called "observation". It's better called as "understanding". It is not possible to "observe" the spiritual world. As far > back as can be found, a large percentage of the poulation has no direct > observation of the spirits of the world. > > So there's no surprise that any one individual does not detect them. > >> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. > > Yet no instrument has ever detected the spirits of the world, either. > As such that direct personal observation does not constitute "evidence". > > Until some such instrument is invented, No need to bother. It can not be done. if ever, the matter of direct > personal observeration that is the starting point of all religion > remains outside of the realm of science. To the extent no one tries to > impose their observations on others - Ooops there for a small number of > very large population religions. To the extent no one claims that the > existence of their deity can be proved by science - Ooops there for one > specific very large population religion. Your claim is flawed. Religion is a philosophy of life that is outside science. Science can not prove or disprove philosophy. It is neither capable, nor qualified to talk about philosophy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 18:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-334022.18302018082015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515132 |
In article <mr0csj$k35$1@dont-email.me>, Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> wrote: > niunian wrote: > > Attila wrote: > > > >> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. > > As far back as can be found, a small percentage of the population has > had direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. ] What "spirits"? Do you have any evidence that any such thing exists? And, no, visions indistinguishable from hallucinations are not evidence. -- JD I've officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 04:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jvf8tah1h8hi8fjrkqgqvra3nc0f54b0fk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515132 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:51:00 +0000 (UTC), Doug Freyburger <dfreybur@yahoo.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mr0csj$k35$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >niunian wrote: >> Attila wrote: >> >>> I have yet to see any evidence any 'spiritual world' ever existed. > >As far back as can be found, a small percentage of the population has >had direct personal observation of the spirits of the world. As far >back as can be found, a large percentage of the poulation has no direct >observation of the spirits of the world. > >So there's no surprise that any one individual does not detect them. I wonder what percentage of that "small percentage' was on drugs at the time? Or was delusional? Or flat out lied? > >> I'm afraid your physical eyes can not see the spiritual world the same >> way your physical science can not prove or disprove philosophy. The >> spiritual existence is beyond the ability of your physical eyes. > >Yet no instrument has ever detected the spirits of the world, either. >As such that direct personal observation does not constitute "evidence". > >Until some such instrument is invented, if ever, the matter of direct >personal observeration that is the starting point of all religion >remains outside of the realm of science. To the extent no one tries to >impose their observations on others - Ooops there for a small number of >very large population religions. To the extent no one claims that the >existence of their deity can be proved by science - Ooops there for one >specific very large population religion. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 13:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d3e1u7Ftc24U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #514596 |
On 17/08/2015 10:56, Attila < wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>> >>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>> world of death. >>>>> >>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>> >>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>> living will cease to exist. >>> >>> <looks around> >>> >>> No god, and everything is still here... >> >> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >> called a realization from the within. > > It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. There's nothing ambiguous about it being poppycock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 19:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6uq4tahd8mg45vs3dghskhle3j5mt78hbp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514618 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:21:27 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> in alt.atheism with message-id <d3e1u7Ftc24U2@mid.individual.net> wrote: >On 17/08/2015 10:56, Attila < wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:52:33 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <mqri7d$uc4$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>> >>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>> >>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>> >>>> <looks around> >>>> >>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>> >>> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >>> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >>> called a realization from the within. >> >> It sounds like ambiguous poppycock to me. > >There's nothing ambiguous about it being poppycock. > True, but it also contains more than a bit of ambiguity. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 13:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d3e321FtnnhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #514529 |
On 17/08/2015 03:52, niunian wrote: > On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>> >>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>> world of death. >>>> >>>> And what definition is _that_? >>> >>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>> living will cease to exist. >> >> <looks around> >> >> No god, and everything is still here... > > The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, > there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's > called a realization from the within. I did experience that once. It was a fever-induced hallucination. I recovered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 12:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <e834ta9h4dll00bapme756e4c7mlrem7if@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514624 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:40:33 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On 17/08/2015 03:52, niunian wrote nonsense:
More nonsense about nothingness cross-posted
indiscriminately.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 00:51 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqt3bj$96o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514624 |
On 2015-08-17 08:40 PM, Alex W. wrote: > On 17/08/2015 03:52, niunian wrote: >> On 2015-08-16 09:58 PM, Alex W. wrote: >>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>> >>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>> world of death. >>>>> >>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>> >>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the >>>> world of >>>> living will cease to exist. >>> >>> <looks around> >>> >>> No god, and everything is still here... >> >> The God of living is from within, not without. So stop looking around, >> there is nothing you can see with your eyes or hear with your ears. It's >> called a realization from the within. > > I did experience that once. > It was a fever-induced hallucination. > I recovered. Nothing to do with hallucinations. It's just simple understanding with the power to change one's life. The mind is clear and at peace. No visual image, and no voices in the mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 14:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nba4ta1mf65v9vfic43j4e3mas5asia874@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514694 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:51:06 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> wrote:
>On 2015-08-17 08:40 PM, Alex W. wrote nothing but nonsense:
More nonsense about nothingness cross-posted
indiscriminately.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 21:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D2BA08.111A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #514275 |
Alex W. wrote: > > On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: > > On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, > >> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >> > >>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >>>> > >>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down > >>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. > >>>> > >>>> Um, what definition is that? > >>> > >>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the > >>> world of death. > >> > >> And what definition is _that_? > > > > It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all > > living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of > > living will cease to exist. > > <looks around> > > No god, and everything is still here... what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the aquarium tank? You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're seeing. So, it looks as if God is not there... you have fish eyes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 00:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqudu1$rp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514972 |
Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > Alex W. wrote: >> >> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>> >>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>> >>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>> world of death. >>>> >>>> And what definition is _that_? >>> >>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >>> living will cease to exist. >> >> <looks around> >> >> No god, and everything is still here... > > what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the > aquarium tank? > > > You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're > seeing. > > So, it looks as if God is not there... > > > you have fish eyes. You should be in an institution. -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 01:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mquekn$27e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514973 |
Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: >> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : >>> Alex W. wrote: >>>> >>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>> >>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>> >>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the >>>>> world of >>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>> >>>> <looks around> >>>> >>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>> >>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the >>> aquarium tank? >>> >>> >>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're >>> seeing. >>> >>> So, it looks as if God is not there... >>> >>> >>> you have fish eyes. >> >> You should be in an institution. > > You should be dead and have worms eating your body. Why the conditional? -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 01:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqufdb$5l5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514977 |
Le 2015-08-18 01:13, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > On 8/17/2015 10:10 PM, Olrik wrote: >> Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : >>> On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: >>>> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : >>>>> Alex W. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the >>>>>>> world of >>>>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> <looks around> >>>>>> >>>>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>>>> >>>>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the >>>>> aquarium tank? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're >>>>> seeing. >>>>> >>>>> So, it looks as if God is not there... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you have fish eyes. >>>> >>>> You should be in an institution. >>> >>> You should be dead and have worms eating your body. >> >> Why the conditional? > > What conditional, fuckwit? There was no conditional. > > Maybe you're not a native English speaker after all. «after all»? I never pretended to be one, you little troll. > However...you need to stop with the "a écrit" bullshit, espèce de con. > Tu n'ecris pas dans un forum francophone. Arrête avec ta connerie. Why did you write your comment in French? Hypocrite much? -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 22:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D2C300.1331@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #514982 |
Olrik wrote: > > Le 2015-08-18 01:13, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > > On 8/17/2015 10:10 PM, Olrik wrote: > >> Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > >>> On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: > >>>> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > >>>>> Alex W. wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, > >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down > >>>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the > >>>>>>>>> world of death. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all > >>>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the > >>>>>>> world of > >>>>>>> living will cease to exist. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <looks around> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No god, and everything is still here... > >>>>> > >>>>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the > >>>>> aquarium tank? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're > >>>>> seeing. > >>>>> > >>>>> So, it looks as if God is not there... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> you have fish eyes. > >>>> > >>>> You should be in an institution. > >>> > >>> You should be dead and have worms eating your body. > >> > >> Why the conditional? > > > > What conditional, fuckwit? There was no conditional. > > > > Maybe you're not a native English speaker after all. > > «after all»? I never pretended to be one, you little troll. > > > However...you need to stop with the "a écrit" bullshit, espèce de con. > > Tu n'ecris pas dans un forum francophone. Arrête avec ta connerie. > > Why did you write your comment in French? Hypocrite much? You see what happens when you mix diffrent breeds of fishes in the same tank...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 22:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D2C370.3BBC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #514984 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Olrik wrote: > > > > Le 2015-08-18 01:13, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > > > On 8/17/2015 10:10 PM, Olrik wrote: > > >> Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > > >>> On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: > > >>>> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > > >>>>> Alex W. wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: > > >>>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > > >>>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, > > >>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down > > >>>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the > > >>>>>>>>> world of death. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all > > >>>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the > > >>>>>>> world of > > >>>>>>> living will cease to exist. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> <looks around> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> No god, and everything is still here... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the > > >>>>> aquarium tank? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're > > >>>>> seeing. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> So, it looks as if God is not there... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> you have fish eyes. > > >>>> > > >>>> You should be in an institution. > > >>> > > >>> You should be dead and have worms eating your body. > > >> > > >> Why the conditional? > > > > > > What conditional, fuckwit? There was no conditional. > > > > > > Maybe you're not a native English speaker after all. > > > > «after all»? I never pretended to be one, you little troll. > > > > > However...you need to stop with the "a écrit" bullshit, espèce de con. > > > Tu n'ecris pas dans un forum francophone. Arrête avec ta connerie. > > > > Why did you write your comment in French? Hypocrite much? > > You see what happens when you mix diffrent breeds of fishes in the same > tank... how do ants tell each other apart if they all look alike?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 01:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mqug7k$7gg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514984 |
Le 2015-08-18 01:30, The Starmaker a écrit : > Olrik wrote: >> >> Le 2015-08-18 01:13, Rudy Canoza a écrit : >>> On 8/17/2015 10:10 PM, Olrik wrote: >>>> Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : >>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: >>>>>> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : >>>>>>> Alex W. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>>>>>>>>> world of death. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >>>>>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the >>>>>>>>> world of >>>>>>>>> living will cease to exist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <looks around> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No god, and everything is still here... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the >>>>>>> aquarium tank? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're >>>>>>> seeing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, it looks as if God is not there... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you have fish eyes. >>>>>> >>>>>> You should be in an institution. >>>>> >>>>> You should be dead and have worms eating your body. >>>> >>>> Why the conditional? >>> >>> What conditional, fuckwit? There was no conditional. >>> >>> Maybe you're not a native English speaker after all. >> >> «after all»? I never pretended to be one, you little troll. >> >>> However...you need to stop with the "a écrit" bullshit, espèce de con. >>> Tu n'ecris pas dans un forum francophone. Arrête avec ta connerie. >> >> Why did you write your comment in French? Hypocrite much? > > > You see what happens when you mix diffrent breeds of fishes in the same > tank... Indeed! You've been eaten and spit out! Good riddance, troll! -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 23:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55D2D2DC.3BC7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #514986 |
Olrik wrote: > > Le 2015-08-18 01:30, The Starmaker a écrit : > > Olrik wrote: > >> > >> Le 2015-08-18 01:13, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > >>> On 8/17/2015 10:10 PM, Olrik wrote: > >>>> Le 2015-08-18 01:07, Rudy Canoza a écrit : > >>>>> On 8/17/2015 9:57 PM, Olrik wrote: > >>>>>> Le 2015-08-18 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > >>>>>>> Alex W. wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 16/08/2015 12:53, niunian wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, > >>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Um, what definition is that? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the > >>>>>>>>>>> world of death. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> And what definition is _that_? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all > >>>>>>>>> living things. Without God, all living things will die, and the > >>>>>>>>> world of > >>>>>>>>> living will cease to exist. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> <looks around> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No god, and everything is still here... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> what do you think a fish sees when he <looks around> from inside the > >>>>>>> aquarium tank? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You can now be looking at God but simply don't understand what you're > >>>>>>> seeing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So, it looks as if God is not there... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> you have fish eyes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You should be in an institution. > >>>>> > >>>>> You should be dead and have worms eating your body. > >>>> > >>>> Why the conditional? > >>> > >>> What conditional, fuckwit? There was no conditional. > >>> > >>> Maybe you're not a native English speaker after all. > >> > >> «after all»? I never pretended to be one, you little troll. > >> > >>> However...you need to stop with the "a écrit" bullshit, espèce de con. > >>> Tu n'ecris pas dans un forum francophone. Arrête avec ta connerie. > >> > >> Why did you write your comment in French? Hypocrite much? > > > > > > You see what happens when you mix diffrent breeds of fishes in the same > > tank... > > Indeed! You've been eaten and spit out! > > Good riddance, troll! > > -- > Olrik > aa #1981 > EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division that is no way for a food inspector to talk. tell me, what is the longest period of time meat is kept refridgerated before it reaches comsumers? 5 years, ten years, twenty years?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7qb3talvd61dbjg5c0ltuf9fjq7ule62f1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514200 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >> >>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>> >>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>> >>>> Um, what definition is that? >>> >>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>> world of death. >> >> And what definition is _that_? > >It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >living things. But where is this definition found? > Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >living will cease to exist. What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | niunian <niunian@ymail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 20:12 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <mqsjdk$7c0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #514595 |
On 2015-08-17 05:55 PM, Attila < wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:53:17 +0800, niunian <niunian@ymail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <mqpth7$jil$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 2015-08-16 01:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> In article <mqke7a$vf2$9@dont-email.me>, >>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>> >>>> On 2015-08-13 09:26 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>>> niunian <niunian@ymail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> The fear of death can also be a purpose. It would be bowing down >>>>>> to the god of death which by definition, is the devil. >>>>> >>>>> Um, what definition is that? >>>> >>>> By definition, God rules the world of living, the devil rules the >>>> world of death. >>> >>> And what definition is _that_? >> >> It's the definition of God as the living God who gives life to all >> living things. > > But where is this definition found? The Bible in Genesis. > >> Without God, all living things will die, and the world of >> living will cease to exist. > > What evidence do you have that any god ever existed? Please use > verified sources only, and no vague ambiguities. The issue of God's existence is a personal one. I can't give you my experience of God. You have to have your own experience to truly understand the meaning of God. I can only show you where you can find your own God. He is within you as the center of your life. You live your life for him, and he rewards you with happiness and love in life. Once again, this isn't your elementary science education, so stop asking for the "evidence" of God like a total idiot. Can you give me ten pounds of love and three ounces of wisdom? If not, there is no such thing as the evidence of God either. The entire universe is God's manifestation. You can not claim one part of the universe is God's evidence but the other part is not. > > -- > Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. > > Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially > those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. > > Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government > guaranteed above average income for every person. > > Every illegal alien is a criminal. > No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > Deportation upon identification as the only option. > > If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly > before you run into me. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web