Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread

NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Last post2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 205 — 22 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
                                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
                                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
                                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
                                          Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
                                            Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
                                              Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
                                                Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
                                                Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
                                                  Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
                                            Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
                                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
                          Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky  still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
                              Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
                                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
                Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
                    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
                      Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
                        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
                          Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
                            Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
                  Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
                              Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
                                Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
                                  Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
                                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
                          Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
                            Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
                              Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
                                Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
                                  Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
                                    Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
                      Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
                        Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
                Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
                  Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
        Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
    Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700

Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11  Next page →


#517943 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills
Message-ID<09q6ua5sfso7c39r5mc98hdbbda5ub9tm6@4ax.com>
In reply to#517896
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:39:36 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:82k5uatvtld8klrsbl6gso6dvf5oiem20h@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:34:35 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know 
>>>> who I
>>>> am.  I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an
>>>> attorney present to represent me.  <G>
>>>
>>>Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your
>>>insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock
>>>you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics
>>>you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just
>>>FYI.
>>
>>     It may be worth noting that Rocky's name in real life is Roger
>> Wittekind.
>>     Some of his ranting can be found here:
>>
>> http://brokensixthamendment.com/
>>
>> http://overprotectivemother.com/
>
>And don't forget http://slimefest.com/exhibits/

     I wasn't trying to offer a comprehensive list of your web sites.
     Who is Kent Wills, and why are you so OBSESSED with him? I know
I've asked this several times, but you've never offered and answer.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517963 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills
Message-ID<mrvtlt$6u9$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#517896
On 8/30/2015 11:39 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:82k5uatvtld8klrsbl6gso6dvf5oiem20h@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:34:35 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know
>>>> who I
>>>> am.  I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an
>>>> attorney present to represent me.  <G>

>>> Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your
>>> insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock
>>> you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics
>>> you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just
>>> FYI.

>>      It may be worth noting that Rocky's name in real life is Roger
>> Wittekind.
>>      Some of his ranting can be found here:
>>
>> http://brokensixthamendment.com/
>>
>> http://overprotectivemother.com/
>
> And don't forget http://slimefest.com/exhibits/
>
> Rocky
>
>

        Child Abuser !

  may they pick you up soon and let your ROT IN PRISON

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518092 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills
Message-ID<ah78uad7pe4bf0nm7lbreb1ftjobds3htm@4ax.com>
In reply to#517963
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:47:43 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
wrote:

>On 8/30/2015 11:39 AM, Rocky wrote:
>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:82k5uatvtld8klrsbl6gso6dvf5oiem20h@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:34:35 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know
>>>>> who I
>>>>> am.  I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an
>>>>> attorney present to represent me.  <G>
>
>>>> Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your
>>>> insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock
>>>> you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics
>>>> you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just
>>>> FYI.
>
>>>      It may be worth noting that Rocky's name in real life is Roger
>>> Wittekind.
>>>      Some of his ranting can be found here:
>>>
>>> http://brokensixthamendment.com/
>>>
>>> http://overprotectivemother.com/
>>
>> And don't forget http://slimefest.com/exhibits/
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
>        Child Abuser !
>

     If I recall correctly, he was charged with harassment. Primarily
by phone. And the woman was close to his age.

>  may they pick you up soon and let your ROT IN PRISON
>

     He was already tried for the charge. He was found guilty in the
first trial. He appealed, as was his right, and a re-trial was
ordered. He was found not guilty at the re-trial.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517912 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<ceff5b2a9254aaebed642bd116775918@dizum.com>
In reply to#517825
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

K Wills (Shill #3), in
<news:82k5uatvtld8klrsbl6gso6dvf5oiem20h@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:34:35 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who I 
>>> am.  I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an 
>>> attorney present to represent me.  <G>

>> Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your
>> insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock
>> you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics
>> you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just
>> FYI.

> It may be worth noting that Rocky's name in real life is Roger
> Wittekind. 

Yeah, I know... I was just trying to force the kook to publicly admit
his real-life name and tie himself to his paranoid delusional
schizophrenic rantings.

But your having done so for Witless Roger Wittekind is nearly as good.

You see, I don't go real-life. That would be wrong.

<snicker>

> Some of his ranting can be found here:
> 
> http://brokensixthamendment.com/
> 
> http://overprotectivemother.com/

Now that it's been made public, it cannot be considered harassment to
publicize the shit out of the fact that Roger Wittekind is a
paranoid-delusional schizophrenic who was once dragged into court for
telephone harassment of a woman, and all because she was trying to
protect her daughter from Roger Wittekind's stalking.

To wit:
<http://www.ecases.us/case/illappct/2063244/wittekind-v-rusk>
====================================================
Roger WITTEKIND, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
Beverly RUSK, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

"At the hearing regarding defendant's motion for sanctions, the trial
court made the following remarks to plaintiff:

"I am just going to say it here that it is my absolute opinion that
you ought to drop this case and quit trying to relive it. Quit trying
to reopen it, and accept the fact that this case is over and done.

* * * You do have a right to take this to a higher court. * * *

But if you do take it to a higher court there's a provision in the
Appellate Rules which also applies to frivolous appeals, and * * * the
Appellate Court may give us some guidance as to what we should do in
cases involving litigants who appear on their own and raise legal
arguments that do not have merit."

The trial court properly informed plaintiff that his case was over and
should be dropped. Further, the court warned plaintiff that an appeal
could be found frivolous by the appellate court.

Disregarding the trial court's admonitions, plaintiff nevertheless
continued this litigation by filing his notice of appeal. In Kubiak,
we imposed sanctions under Rule 375(b) when the defendant appealed
from a similarly meritless petition to vacate a judgment. We noted
that the defendant's appeal required the plaintiff to continually
defend against the defendant's "refusal to abide by this court's
rulings." (Kubiak, 228 Ill.App.3d at 608, 170 Ill.Dec. at 522, 592
N.E.2d at 1202.) Here, plaintiff has refused to abide by our mandate
affirming the trial court's judgment. Based upon the history of this
case, we conclude that appropriate sanctions are warranted here.
Plaintiff's appeal is not well grounded in fact or warranted by
existing law.

We recognize that plaintiff was not represented by an attorney before
this court and filed his notice of appeal pro se. However, we find
absolutely no legal basis for plaintiff's appeal. Also, the trial
court essentially informed plaintiff that an appeal would be unwise.
Under these circumstances, we conclude that sanctions should be
imposed against plaintiff."
====================================================

Whooopsie... looks like the courts dismissed it because Witless Roger
Wittekind kept trying to bring the dismissed court case back to
life... then the court recommended *sanctions* against Witless Roger
Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional kook. LOL

<http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Misc/misc.transport.trucking/2005-12/msg00724.html>
====================================================
Q. Is Roger Wittekind a good employee?

A. No. He has problems dealing with co-workers. During his short
employment with Mansur Trucking he had a couple of major run-ins with
fellow workers and bosses. Just after a few weeks on the job he felt
that he knew more than the Maps and Fuel girl Judy and ended up
hanging the phone up on her while she was giving directions which lead
to a conflict to where there was friction between the office and him.
He went to extremes trying to prove his point even calling the owner
on a Sunday complaining that Judy does not listen to him. He feels
that since he's the one that requires the information he can dictate
to the office that his needs are the most important. He received a
warning from the company on his dealings with Judy.

Then he failed to follow the direction of the shop supervisor when he
had problems on the road. He was giving simple directions on where to
go but he felt that wasn't good enough. His decision cost the company
money since the vehicle stalled and had to be towed. The company did
keep his sign-on bonus of $500 and wanted him to pay for the towing
since he was responsible. After it was all over of course Roger posted
that everyone involved had lied. This is all from his own postings
back in 12/31/2003.
====================================================

<http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Misc/misc.transport.trucking/2005-12/msg00747.html>
====================================================
About Judy, "My first verbal warning that could lead to immediate
dismissal" 12/26/2003 12:27pm,

"Failed the redundant lecture drill after 4 or 5 repeats (can't handle
nagging)" 12/31/2003 6:29pm,

"My first verbal warning - Part Two" 1/16/2004 7:31pm,

"Lost my sign on bonus part II" 1/16/2004 7:40pm, 

"What should I say when I start looking for my second trucking job?" 
1/17/2004 5:58pm,

"Could this be a safety issue?" 1/18/2004 9:08pm,

"The days of rookies life, first meeting with CEO" 1/23/2004 8:27pm. 

About his lack of knowledge of truck operations and losing money,
"Lost my sign on bonus because" 1/9/2004 11:09pm,

"Can my vacation pay be f_cked with also" 1/11/2004 12:01pm. 
====================================================

<http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Misc/misc.transport.trucking/2005-12/msg00774.html>
====================================================
Q. Is Roger Wittekind a safe driver? 

A. Not in the least. He's stated many times he's done unsafe acts
while driving but this one example shows just how unsafe he really is.
While driving some other drivers tried to warn Roger that his front
tire was going flat. They gave a signal pointing at the front tire and
holding their thumb down. He did not stop to check. He figured they
were playing a trick on him so he keep driving. When he got back to
the yard his front tire was almost completly flat. 
Reference; "This weeks breakdown" 12/24/2003 9:49pm. 

Q. Has Roger Wittekind lied? 

A. On several occasions about how much time he had worked. But one
example he can not deny is the fact that he said he took 5 days
vacation. A call to Mansur Trucking confirmed that no driver can take
any vacation before 6 months on the job. He only had 3 months. Also
during the same thread Topper had proved that Roger had lied about how
much time he has on the job.
Reference; Kyo Sakamoto 11/23/2005 1:42am under the thread of "Nobody
gives a f_ck Revisited" by gpsman on 11/16/2005 2:06pm. 
====================================================

Roger Wittekind is far too delusional and insane to drive a tricycle,
let alone a truck.

<snicker>

All publicly available information, and all completely legal to make
public all over again. Right, Roger? LOL

-- 

Roger Wittekind, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid
admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more
desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes
your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of
illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Mike.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517945 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<8eq6uadfpva7ij6dtcp53pincc3mc66uh7@4ax.com>
In reply to#517912
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 19:47:11 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>K Wills (Shill #3), in
><news:82k5uatvtld8klrsbl6gso6dvf5oiem20h@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:34:35 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who I 
>>>> am.  I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an 
>>>> attorney present to represent me.  <G>
>
>>> Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your
>>> insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock
>>> you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics
>>> you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just
>>> FYI.
>
>> It may be worth noting that Rocky's name in real life is Roger
>> Wittekind. 
>
>Yeah, I know... I was just trying to force the kook to publicly admit
>his real-life name and tie himself to his paranoid delusional
>schizophrenic rantings.
>

     I apologize for ruining your plan.
     I did find it odd that you would post such information. At our
most heated, you never tried to post any personal information about
me. I suppose that should have been a clue to me.

>But your having done so for Witless Roger Wittekind is nearly as good.
>
>You see, I don't go real-life. That would be wrong.
>
><snicker>
>
>> Some of his ranting can be found here:
>> 
>> http://brokensixthamendment.com/
>> 
>> http://overprotectivemother.com/
>
>Now that it's been made public, it cannot be considered harassment to
>publicize the shit out of the fact that Roger Wittekind is a
>paranoid-delusional schizophrenic who was once dragged into court for
>telephone harassment of a woman, and all because she was trying to
>protect her daughter from Roger Wittekind's stalking.
>

     It's only because of the mom's attempt to keep Rocky from her
daughter by lying that he was able to get a not guilty verdict at the
re-trial. Had she simply been honest about everything from the
beginning, he might well have had the original verdict affirmed.
     I can understand her motivation. I wouldn't want the likes of
Roger having any unnecessary contact with my daughter. The idea of
lying to help ensure he's unable to be in contact with her would
likely cross my mind.

>To wit:
><http://www.ecases.us/case/illappct/2063244/wittekind-v-rusk>
>====================================================
>Roger WITTEKIND, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
>v.
>Beverly RUSK, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
>
>"At the hearing regarding defendant's motion for sanctions, the trial
>court made the following remarks to plaintiff:
>
>"I am just going to say it here that it is my absolute opinion that
>you ought to drop this case and quit trying to relive it. Quit trying
>to reopen it, and accept the fact that this case is over and done.
>

     Roger doesn't bring it up too often. Over the course of a decade
plus, he's been able to move on, for the most part.

>* * * You do have a right to take this to a higher court. * * *
>
>But if you do take it to a higher court there's a provision in the
>Appellate Rules which also applies to frivolous appeals, and * * * the
>Appellate Court may give us some guidance as to what we should do in
>cases involving litigants who appear on their own and raise legal
>arguments that do not have merit."
>
>The trial court properly informed plaintiff that his case was over and
>should be dropped. Further, the court warned plaintiff that an appeal
>could be found frivolous by the appellate court.
>
>Disregarding the trial court's admonitions, plaintiff nevertheless
>continued this litigation by filing his notice of appeal. In Kubiak,
>we imposed sanctions under Rule 375(b) when the defendant appealed
>from a similarly meritless petition to vacate a judgment. We noted
>that the defendant's appeal required the plaintiff to continually
>defend against the defendant's "refusal to abide by this court's
>rulings." (Kubiak, 228 Ill.App.3d at 608, 170 Ill.Dec. at 522, 592
>N.E.2d at 1202.) Here, plaintiff has refused to abide by our mandate
>affirming the trial court's judgment. Based upon the history of this
>case, we conclude that appropriate sanctions are warranted here.
>Plaintiff's appeal is not well grounded in fact or warranted by
>existing law.
>
>We recognize that plaintiff was not represented by an attorney before
>this court and filed his notice of appeal pro se. However, we find
>absolutely no legal basis for plaintiff's appeal. Also, the trial
>court essentially informed plaintiff that an appeal would be unwise.
>Under these circumstances, we conclude that sanctions should be
>imposed against plaintiff."

     Roger sought relief from malicious prosecution on the part of the
mom. The court found for the defendant, the mom. Roger appealed this
ruling, as was his right.
     The appellate court affirmed the finding, Wittekind v. Rusk
(October 16, 1991), No. 3-91-0162.
     He should have dropped the matter at this point. He had the not
guilty verdict. The small claims court found he lacked evidence of
malicious prosecution and the appellate court agreed. He had done all
anyone could reasonably expect.

>====================================================
>
>Whooopsie... looks like the courts dismissed it because Witless Roger
>Wittekind kept trying to bring the dismissed court case back to
>life... then the court recommended *sanctions* against Witless Roger
>Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid-delusional kook. LOL
>
><http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Misc/misc.transport.trucking/2005-12/msg00724.html>

     He had every right to appeal the initial dismissal, and he did
so. But he needed to accept the ruling of the appellate court and move
on with his life. But he couldn't.
     This lead to sanctions. I confess I do experience a small level
of schadenfreude knowing that Roger had to pay $1500+ for trying to
cause harm to the mom via the courts.

>====================================================
>Q. Is Roger Wittekind a good employee?
>

[snip of items available at the link to save space]

>
>Roger Wittekind is far too delusional and insane to drive a tricycle,
>let alone a truck.
>

     Here's more proof of that truth:

http://muscatinejournal.com/news/local/driver-charged-after-overturning-ethanol-tanker/article_58e1b452-a5bf-11df-bef7-001cc4c03286.html

If that should wrap, the following will take readers to the same page:

http://gg.gg/3th8y

><snicker>
>
>All publicly available information, and all completely legal to make
>public all over again. Right, Roger? LOL

     I'm not Roger, but you are correct. There is nothing he, or
anyone else, can really do about your posting the information.
     I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517990 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<d5c9f779e0a304b4362ce967620122fc@dizum.com>
In reply to#517945
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

K Wills (Shill #3), in
<news:8eq6uadfpva7ij6dtcp53pincc3mc66uh7@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 19:47:11 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Roger Wittekind is far too delusional and insane to drive a tricycle,
>> let alone a truck.

> Here's more proof of that truth:

Funnily enough, after the court system slapped him down, the woman
stalker bleated hard about it, lying the whole way through:
<http://desecratedsixthamendment.com>
<http://brokensixthamendment.com>
<http://overprotectivemother.com>
<http://slimefest.com>

Poor delusional little frothmonkey Roger Wittekind is a paranoid
delusional schizophrenic woman-stalking failed trucker driver and
deadly menace behind the wheel. LOL

> http://muscatinejournal.com/news/local/driver-charged-after-overturning-ethanol-tanker/article_58e1b452-a5bf-11df-bef7-001cc4c03286.html

Yup, posting publicly available information is completely legal.

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Related to:
Scott Wittekind
167 40th Avenue and 4015 78th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244

So not only is Roger Wittekind far too delusional and insane to drive
a tricycle, let alone a truck, but when he gets behind the wheel of a
truck, he becomes a rolling deadly menace. LOL

Roger Wittekind is a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking
failed truck driver who is a danger whenever he's behind the wheel...
and now no trucking company will hire him... except to sweep the
floors. LOL

Take your anti-psychotic meds, Roger Wittekind of East Moline, IL. You
insane babbling conspiracy theorist kook. LOL

-- 

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Mike.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518289 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<htj9ua1ehjeu8fhnfp4qevcm6h6d4ie724@4ax.com>
In reply to#517945
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:40:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
>about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
>of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.

Wow.   LOL.    I stepped away for a day and return to find Rocky isn't
Michael but Roger and Roger is a complete turd.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518294 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah)

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah)
Message-ID<jOGdnYt39_YUTHnInZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#518289
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:htj9ua1ehjeu8fhnfp4qevcm6h6d4ie724@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:40:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
>>about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
>>of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.
>
> Wow.   LOL.    I stepped away for a day and return to find Rocky isn't
> Michael but Roger and Roger is a complete turd.

And I told you I wasn't Michael but you just wouldn't listen.  Shame on you.

BTW is what you called me what you say about everybody that has proven they 
won a jury trial 12 to 0 by using the state's own evidence against them?

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518299 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah)

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah)
Message-ID<7cl9ua5ajqv4nmn4b2ls2u76efto4feu2s@4ax.com>
In reply to#518294
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:47 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:htj9ua1ehjeu8fhnfp4qevcm6h6d4ie724@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:40:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
>>>about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
>>>of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.
>>
>> Wow.   LOL.    I stepped away for a day and return to find Rocky isn't
>> Michael but Roger and Roger is a complete turd.
>
>And I told you I wasn't Michael but you just wouldn't listen.  Shame on you.

Still posting as Rocky...

>BTW is what you called me what you say about everybody that has proven they 
>won a jury trial 12 to 0 by using the state's own evidence against them?

Do you stalk a lot of women, Roger?    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518358 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah)

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah)
Message-ID<04qaua983drmh4sc5j5fufd088pplahspo@4ax.com>
In reply to#518294
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:47 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:htj9ua1ehjeu8fhnfp4qevcm6h6d4ie724@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:40:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
>>>about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
>>>of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.
>>
>> Wow.   LOL.    I stepped away for a day and return to find Rocky isn't
>> Michael but Roger and Roger is a complete turd.
>
>And I told you I wasn't Michael but you just wouldn't listen.  Shame on you.
>
>BTW is what you called me what you say about everybody that has proven they 
>won a jury trial 12 to 0 by using the state's own evidence against them?

     The only reason you won the re-trial was because the mom, in an
attempt to protect her daughter from you, lied. She was caught, which
established reasonable doubt.
     Had mom simply been honest from the start, it's very probable you
would still have a conviction.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518357 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<t2qaua1tpshhs523tot28scefrk32o5jma@4ax.com>
In reply to#518289
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:05:48 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:40:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
>>about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
>>of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.
>
>Wow.   LOL.    I stepped away for a day and return to find Rocky isn't
>Michael but Roger and Roger is a complete turd.  

     As it turned out, FNVW was setting Roger up. Unfortunately, I
didn't realize this and ruined it by outing Roger's real name to all
who are paying attention.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518579 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<dnkeua9969snj612094gqnfptfpc6hl1kv@4ax.com>
In reply to#518357
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 03:57:33 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:05:48 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:40:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
>>>about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
>>>of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.
>>
>>Wow.   LOL.    I stepped away for a day and return to find Rocky isn't
>>Michael but Roger and Roger is a complete turd.  
>
>     As it turned out, FNVW was setting Roger up. Unfortunately, I
>didn't realize this and ruined it by outing Roger's real name to all
>who are paying attention.

To be honest I don't see any harm done.  The result is Roger is now
spending all his time defending his legal entanglements.   I have no female
children but if I had I would have done everything in my power to keep them
away from Roger and every other mentally disturbed stalker in the world.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518604 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<9goeua59nf2j59dlg1v6gmfl5dfgqherac@4ax.com>
In reply to#518579
On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:54:03 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 03:57:33 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:05:48 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:40:41 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>>><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I anticipate Roger going ape crazy about how everyone was lying
>>>>about him (because he's important enough to warrant such a conspiracy,
>>>>of course) in an attempt to cause him grief.
>>>
>>>Wow.   LOL.    I stepped away for a day and return to find Rocky isn't
>>>Michael but Roger and Roger is a complete turd.  
>>
>>     As it turned out, FNVW was setting Roger up. Unfortunately, I
>>didn't realize this and ruined it by outing Roger's real name to all
>>who are paying attention.
>
>To be honest I don't see any harm done.  

     When all is said and done, no real harm was done. I ended up
bring out Roger's legal woes earlier than FNVW had planned.

>The result is Roger is now
>spending all his time defending his legal entanglements.   I have no female
>children but if I had I would have done everything in my power to keep them
>away from Roger and every other mentally disturbed stalker in the world.  

     Mom's motivation for lying (I hold the *opinion* that she did
lie) is understandable. She wanted Roger to leave her daughter alone,
but he was either unwilling or unable. However, her doing so allowed
Roger to win his appeal and get a re-trial. Her lying most probably
raised reasonable doubt in the mind of the jury, which is all a
defendant needs.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518143 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#517750
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net...
>>
>>>>> Now back to the link above.  Do you really think fertilizer bombs can
>>>>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire
>>>>> bombs?
>>
>> If you just get a fireball when setting off ANFO, you're doing it wrong.
>> ANFO is widely used in quarrying and mining.  It's the most used explosive
>> in the United States because it's cheap and relatively safe.  The Oklahoma
>> City bomb was actually a more powerful variant of ANFO, ammonium nitrate+
>> nitromethane.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO

>Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now why 
>was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing damage 
>from a single location?

What do you mean "cut like a knife"?  The whole front of the building
was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife".
Like you'd expect from a truck bomb.

>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation Area?"

Except there wasn't.  More importantly, there was no radiation detected
at Oklahoma City.  That by itself is enough to disprove nuke kooktardery.
Not to mention no seismometer readings with the distinct nuclear 
detonation signature.  None.

>>>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers
>>>>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>> no it doesn't
>>
>>>Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual.
>>
>> Here's the evidence, Michael.

>Nope, my name is not Mike, Michael or any varient of that and it never has 
>been.  Plus a lot of people can vouch for that.

Ok, how about if I just call you "Kooktard" from now on, Michael.

>> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark.  Just small
>> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the
>> towers.

>You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add to 
>the lies from the media.

Yup.  No radiation detected.  Just vague unsubstantiated claims from
various k00ksites.  If there was a nuke there, all of Lower Manhattan
would be hot as hell with radiation.  Don't forget an underground or
ground level nuke neutron activates the surrounding material, making it
extremely radioactive.

>> 2) No EMPs detected.  All electronics would have been fried, all
>> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs.

>I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP.

There was *no* EMP at all.  If there was, there would be no video of
the collapses, helicopters would fall out of the air, etc. as all 
electronics in the area would be fried.

>I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS 
>chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground 
>under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera.

They don't use AM for helicopter to ground station for video, K00ktard.
No matter, the transmitter and receiver would have been wiped out, AM or
not.

>To me the ground shaking and the recorded EMP are two things that when tied 
>together prove a nuclear detonation took place in Nuke York City.

You are a k00ktard, so your "to me" opinions are irrelevant.  What is
relevant are the many seismograph readings that did record the collapse
(likely including the shaking) as a 2.3 magnitude quake but no nuclear
detonation signature, thus disproving any nuke use.

>> 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud.

>Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud 
>incase you didn't know.  And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom cloud 
>to say nukes.

They do if they break through the ground, which they would have to do in
order to "vaporize" the towers.  But there were no fireballs and no 
mushroom clouds spreading radiation everywhere.  So no nukes.

>> 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers.

>ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North 
>Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not caught 
>on USGS Seismographs?  I wonder why.

What about all the other seismographs worldwide that the USGS had no
control over?  You never answered this, because you can't.  No nuclear
detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear
detonation.  They did record all the shaking/collapse as a 2.3 magnitude
quake, however.

>Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied 
>about Ground Zero why not the USGS too?

Irrelevant.  No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph,
worldwide), so no nuclear detonation.  USGS can't change that no matter
how much they may have wanted to lie about anything.

>> 5) We don't have the technology, neither now nor in 1968, to dig down
>> 37-96 *miles* needed to do the things you claim.

>That is more total bullshit from the Friendly Neighborhood Nut and I even 
>gave him a link to try and correct his bullshit:  Here see for yourself it 
>is more like 77 meters below surface level.  See:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition

Why such a k00ky Wikipedia URL?  Is it because that article wouldn't last
5 seconds as a normal Wikipedia article before all the falsehoods were
corrected?  But it could exist by itself in some kooktard's sandbox?

>> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves
>> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and
>> dust.

>ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive dirt 
>hauled out.

I already accounted for your 120 truckloads of dirt.  108,342 truckloads
hauled out minus 120 truckloads that were brought in = 108,222 truckloads
of actual debris hauled out.  How do you explain 108,222 truckloads of
debris (1.5 million tons!) if the towers were vaporized, k00k?

>And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because 
>photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers.

There's a lot of debris there (including lots of metal), k00k!  Why
don't you look at your own picture!!

>> 7) All the videos of the collapses show the towers collapsing from the top
>> down, not the bottom up.

>ROTFLMAO because the debris on the ground where the Twin Towers were was not 
>from the top 100 floors but from the bottom 10 floors or less.  See:

There are a zillion videos of the towers collapsing, k00k.  They all show
the towers collapsing from the impact floors down, not the bottom up.
And none of those videocams were disabled by EMPs!  None!

>> 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers *while
>> it was collapsing* weren't nuked.

>Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but there 
>is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now.

How can there be any radiation sickness if it's known for fact there was
no radiation?  I'm not discounting many people got sick, cancer etc. from
the toxic smoke, asbestos, dust (silicosis), fumes and so forth at 
the site.  We know that it wasn't from radiation.

>> Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on?

>I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who I 
>am.  I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an 
>attorney present to represent me.  <G>

So what crime were you tried for?  I have never been on trial for a crime
in my life.  Also, did you actually commit that crime?  I'm not asking if
you were found not guilty, you already answered that, I'm asking if you
actually did the deed and got away with it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518156 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<MPG.304e11b3d726614d98ad6d@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#518143
In article <ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com 
says...


> >Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now why 
> >was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing damage 
> >from a single location?
> 
> What do you mean "cut like a knife"?  The whole front of the building
> was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife".
> Like you'd expect from a truck bomb.
> 

I can explain that.  I think what the OP meant, was cut like a DULL 
knife.  You know how when you try to cut a cake with a dull knife, and 
it sort of smooshes the cake all over the place, instead of making a 
nice clean cut?  That's what the Alfred P. Murrah building looked 
like... a cake that had been smooshed all over the place like it had 
been cut with a dull knife.  HTH

-- 
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Copyright © 2015 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518162 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma)

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma)
Message-ID<dYqdnQKrGcMHH3nInZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#518156
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message 
news:MPG.304e11b3d726614d98ad6d@news.altopia.com...
> In article <ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com
> says...
>
>
>> >Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now 
>> >why
>> >was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing 
>> >damage
>> >from a single location?
>>
>> What do you mean "cut like a knife"?  The whole front of the building
>> was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife".
>> Like you'd expect from a truck bomb.
>>
>
> I can explain that.  I think what the OP meant, was cut like a DULL
> knife.  You know how when you try to cut a cake with a dull knife, and
> it sort of smooshes the cake all over the place, instead of making a
> nice clean cut?  That's what the Alfred P. Murrah building looked
> like... a cake that had been smooshed all over the place like it had
> been cut with a dull knife.  HTH

Yes, yes, yes because that still does not look like it was caused by a 
single point explosion and it never did.

And just like with Flight 77 videos of the event were immediately 
confiscated so we might never know what was really recorded at Hoaxlahoma 
City.

Oh, I just happened to watch a video about Hoaxlahoma and they said in 2009 
the videos were returned and magically none of them caught the bomb.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518160 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<jKidnTS5IqHF4XnInZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#518143
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net...
>>>
>>>>>> Now back to the link above.  Do you really think fertilizer bombs can
>>>>>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire
>>>>>> bombs?
>>>
>>> If you just get a fireball when setting off ANFO, you're doing it wrong.
>>> ANFO is widely used in quarrying and mining.  It's the most used 
>>> explosive
>>> in the United States because it's cheap and relatively safe.  The 
>>> Oklahoma
>>> City bomb was actually a more powerful variant of ANFO, ammonium 
>>> nitrate+
>>> nitromethane.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO
>
>>Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now 
>>why
>>was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing 
>>damage
>>from a single location?
>
> What do you mean "cut like a knife"?  The whole front of the building
> was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife".
> Like you'd expect from a truck bomb.
>
>>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation 
>>Area?"
>
> Except there wasn't.

riiight.  Too bad you have no supporting evidence.


> More importantly, there was no radiation detected
> at Oklahoma City.  That by itself is enough to disprove nuke kooktardery.
> Not to mention no seismometer readings with the distinct nuclear
> detonation signature.  None.

And you heard about that by watching Bugs Bunny or the Roadrunner?  In other 
words it sure would be nice if you had some support for your bullshit.

And while I agree big nukes will leave a seismic reading what if all they 
used were a bunch of smaller nukes like in Hoaxlahoma City?

And don't forget even though there are two videos that show something major 
happened in Nuke York City why didn't any of the seismographs show the event 
in question?

BTW one video showed the North Tower shaking like a tuning fork and the 
other video showed an explosion at the exact same time as the shaking that 
took place near the base of the Twin Towers.

And don't forget my video.  I have an AM reciver operated by WCBS that 
recorded an EMP at the exact same time the explosion and the shaking took 
place.  <G>

And don' t forget what they used to lower the radiation from Chernobyl 
because it was concrete.  And also don't forget that the alleged "Ice Age 
Pothole" was filled with concrete.  <G>


>>>>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers
>>>>>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>> no it doesn't
>>>
>>>>Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual.
>>>
>>> Here's the evidence, Michael.
>
>>Nope, my name is not Mike, Michael or any varient of that and it never has
>>been.  Plus a lot of people can vouch for that.
>
> Ok, how about if I just call you "Kooktard" from now on, Michael.
>
>>> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark.  Just small
>>> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the
>>> towers.
>
>>You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add 
>>to
>>the lies from the media.
>
> Yup.  No radiation detected.

riiight.  They also didn't find evidence of explosives at Ground Zero and we 
would find out later they didn't even look and I suspect the same holds true 
for your radiation bullshit.


>>> 2) No EMPs detected.  All electronics would have been fried, all
>>> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs.
>
>>I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP.
>
> There was *no* EMP at all.  If there was, there would be no video of
> the collapses, helicopters would fall out of the air, etc. as all
> electronics in the area would be fried.

You have been watching too many Bugs Bunny Cartoons or maybe you have even 
been watching the NIST cartoons since NIST produced cartoons too.


>>I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS
>>chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground
>>under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera.
>
> They don't use AM for helicopter to ground station for video

And your evidence is what?  They obviously had to use AM because nothing 
else could have caught the EMP at the exact same time a nuke shook the North 
Tower so hard the North Tower shook like a tuning fork and was even recocord 
on video.  DUH


> No matter, the transmitter and receiver would have been wiped out, AM or
> not.

Once again you have been watching too many bugs bunny cartoons or cartoons 
from NIST because a real EMP weapon has to be detonated in the atmosphere 
and not 77 meters underground.


>>To me the ground shaking and the recorded EMP are two things that when 
>>tied
>>together prove a nuclear detonation took place in Nuke York City.
>
> What is
> relevant are the many seismograph readings that did record the collapse
> (likely including the shaking) as a 2.3 magnitude quake but no nuclear
> detonation signature, thus disproving any nuke use.

And the seismograph reading also don't show the North Tower shaking like a 
tuning fork so they show clear evidence of being falsified.


>>> 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud.
>
>>Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud
>>incase you didn't know.  And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom 
>>cloud
>>to say nukes.
>
> They do if they break through the ground, which they would have to do in
> order to "vaporize" the towers.  But there were no fireballs and no
> mushroom clouds spreading radiation everywhere.  So no nukes.

ROTFLMAO because you can use the following site to see there are 
consistencies in the mushroom cloud from Ground Zero and a mushroom cloud 
from an underground nuke.
><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm><


>>> 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers.
>
>>ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North
>>Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not 
>>caught
>>on USGS Seismographs?  I wonder why.
>
> What about all the other seismographs worldwide that the USGS had no
> control over?  You never answered this, because you can't.  No nuclear
> detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear
> detonation.  They did record all the shaking/collapse as a 2.3 magnitude
> quake, however.

Just stick to the facts that were the North Tower shook like a Tuning Fork 
and people that felt it described it the exact same way they would decribe a 
5.5 quake proving that all the seismic readings could be bogus.  And if the 
people really behind 9/11 were international terrorist they could fix every 
single seismic reading.


>>Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied
>>about Ground Zero why not the USGS too?
>
> Irrelevant.  No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph,
> worldwide), so no nuclear detonation.  USGS can't change that no matter
> how much they may have wanted to lie about anything.

BULLSHIT the fact the North Tower shook so violently it was caught on camera 
and at the same time another camera caught an explosion proves the seismic 
reading are bullshit just like the rumor of the Twin Towers collapsing to 
the ground or jet in Nuke York City are proven by the fact the only debris 
on the ground is consistant with a bulding less than 10 floors high instead 
of 110 stories tall.


>>> 5) We don't have the technology, neither now nor in 1968, to dig down
>>> 37-96 *miles* needed to do the things you claim.
>
>>That is more total bullshit from the Friendly Neighborhood Nut and I even
>>gave him a link to try and correct his bullshit:  Here see for yourself it
>>is more like 77 meters below surface level.  See:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition
>
> Why such a k00ky Wikipedia URL?  Is it because that article wouldn't last
> 5 seconds as a normal Wikipedia article before all the falsehoods were
> corrected?  But it could exist by itself in some kooktard's sandbox?

And yet you can't find anything wrong with it so you have to rely on others?


>>> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves
>>> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and
>>> dust.
>
>>ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive 
>>dirt
>>hauled out.
>
> I already accounted for your 120 truckloads of dirt.  108,342 truckloads
> hauled out minus 120 truckloads that were brought in = 108,222 truckloads
> of actual debris hauled out.  How do you explain 108,222 truckloads of
> debris (1.5 million tons!) if the towers were vaporized, k00k?

All you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers to see very 
little of that could have been from the Twin Towers themselves.  DUH.


>>And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because
>>photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers.
>
> There's a lot of debris there (including lots of metal), k00k!  Why
> don't you look at your own picture!!

Dude the walls that were left standing of the Twin Towers were from 6 to 8 
floors high.  If the debris had come down instead of floating away the 
debris pile itself would have been much higher than the walls that were left 
standing.

The debris left is only consistant with a 10 story building and not a 110 
story building so what happened to the debris from the other 100 floors? 
<G>


>>> 7) All the videos of the collapses show the towers collapsing from the 
>>> top
>>> down, not the bottom up.
>
>>ROTFLMAO because the debris on the ground where the Twin Towers were was 
>>not
>>from the top 100 floors but from the bottom 10 floors or less.  See:
>
> There are a zillion videos of the towers collapsing, k00k.  They all show
> the towers collapsing from the impact floors down, not the bottom up.
> And none of those videocams were disabled by EMPs!  None!

But if you think they collapsed all the way to the ground you are really an 
idiot especially after I've furnished proof that the falling debris couldn't 
crush the walls that were left standing or the dozen or so people that 
survived inside of Stairwell B of the North Tower because that debris was 
ultra fine and floated away just as numerous photos show.  DUH
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

>>> 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers 
>>> *while
>>> it was collapsing* weren't nuked.
>
>>Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but 
>>there
>>is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now.
>
> How can there be any radiation sickness if it's known for fact there was
> no radiation?  I'm not discounting many people got sick, cancer etc. from
> the toxic smoke, asbestos, dust (silicosis), fumes and so forth at
> the site.  We know that it wasn't from radiation.

Where the fcuk do you come up with that no radiation bullshit?

The facts remain there was plenty of M291 resin used to cover the area where 
the nuke under WTC3 was detonated.

And the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" where another nuke was detonated was 
filled with concrete to try and keep that radition down too.

PLUS LOOK WHAT THEY PUT AT GROUND ZERO!!!  They put great big water 
fountains up to try and wash away any remaining radition.  DUH.


>>> Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on?
>
>>I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who 
>>I
>>am.  I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an
>>attorney present to represent me.  <G>
>
> So what crime were you tried for?  I have never been on trial for a crime
> in my life.  Also, did you actually commit that crime?  I'm not asking if
> you were found not guilty, you already answered that, I'm asking if you
> actually did the deed and got away with it.

I did not do what I was accused but I wish I had because it would been super 
funny since the way I won my jury trial was to completely impeach all 3 of 
the State's witnesses with and dig this, their own evidence!  The State 
never looked at the evidence they had because they didn't think I'd know how 
to present it and they were obviously quite wrong.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518347 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<ms3hbs$uaq$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#518160
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com...

>>>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation 
>>>Area?"
>>
>> Except there wasn't.

>riiight.  Too bad you have no supporting evidence.

Can't prove a negative, k00ktard.  Besides, you made the outlandish claim,
the burden of proof is on you.

>> More importantly, there was no radiation detected
>> at Oklahoma City.  That by itself is enough to disprove nuke kooktardery.
>> Not to mention no seismometer readings with the distinct nuclear
>> detonation signature.  None.

>And you heard about that by watching Bugs Bunny or the Roadrunner?  In other 
>words it sure would be nice if you had some support for your bullshit.

I just checked - you can get geiger counters for under $30 on Ebay.  I had 
a surplus Cold War geiger counter when I was a kid.  There are a lot of
Geiger counters out there.  If OKC was "hot", *someone* would have noticed
by now.  It would still be "hot" today..  The Trinity site is still "hot" 
70+ years after the fact.  Remember also that a ground or underground
blast is dirtier than an aerial blast.  Prompt neutron activation creates
all kinds of radioactive crap from the surrounding rock/dirt.

>And while I agree big nukes will leave a seismic reading what if all they 
>used were a bunch of smaller nukes like in Hoaxlahoma City?

*All* nuclear blasts create a distinctive seismic signature.  
Seismometers world wide will detect it.  There's no way the USGS or any
other US agency can censor them all, especially ones in countries
unfriendly to the US.  There's no escaping detection of a nuclear blast.  
We've been telling you over and over and over again and you still don't
get it.

>And don't forget even though there are two videos that show something major 
>happened in Nuke York City why didn't any of the seismographs show the event 
>in question?

Once again, they *did* register the event in question.  One tower 
registered as a 2.3 on the Richter Scale, the other measured 2.1.

>And don't forget my video.  I have an AM reciver operated by WCBS that 
>recorded an EMP at the exact same time the explosion and the shaking took 
>place.  <G>

There was no EMP, kooktard.  If there was, the EMP would be the end of the
video.  The camera would be fried and the WCBS chopper would be knocked
out of the sky.  This, too, has been explained to you over and over again.

Oh, and once again, the video link from the chopper was FM, not AM.

>>>> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark.  Just small
>>>> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the
>>>> towers.
>>
>>>You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add 
>>>to
>>>the lies from the media.
>>
>> Yup.  No radiation detected.

>riiight.  They also didn't find evidence of explosives at Ground Zero and we 
>would find out later they didn't even look and I suspect the same holds true 
>for your radiation bullshit.

"I suspect" - Hah!

Once again, Geiger counters are dirt cheap.  I'm sure lots of kooktards
rushed to the World Trade Center site, Geiger counter in hand, eager to
prove the WTC was nuked, only to be disappointed that their Geiger
counters remained silent.

Meanwhile, remember that video of the 104 kiloton nuke producing the 290
foot dome?  That was the "Sedan" shot.  It produced a 12,000' tall
radioactive smoke column that went on to contaminate much of the US.  It
left a 1280 foot diameter crater that was too radioactive to enter for 7
months. Meanwhile, rescuers were searching "the Pile" looking for trapped
victims that same day.

That 104 kiloton shot blew out 12 million tons of earth, producing a base
surge 5 miles in diameter, leaving behind that radioactive crater, even
though they drilled down 635 feet below ground level to bury it.  Imagine
what it would do to NYC if set off in Lower Manhattan!  And you claim 
there was a 150 kiloton nuke buried just a few meters below the towers?
No, you claim there were something like 34 of them!!!

34 nukes that don't produce any radioactivity, don't produce any giant
craters, don't produce any EMPs, don't produce any fireballs, and don't 
produce any mushroom clouds or 12,000 foot smoke columns!  How
kooktarded is that!
  
>>>> 2) No EMPs detected.  All electronics would have been fried, all
>>>> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs.
>>
>>>I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP.
>>
>> There was *no* EMP at all.  If there was, there would be no video of
>> the collapses, helicopters would fall out of the air, etc. as all
>> electronics in the area would be fried.

>You have been watching too many Bugs Bunny Cartoons or maybe you have even 
>been watching the NIST cartoons since NIST produced cartoons too.

Your attempt to evade doesn't change the fact there was no EMP.

>>>I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS
>>>chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground
>>>under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera.
>>
>> They don't use AM for helicopter to ground station for video

>And your evidence is what?  They obviously had to use AM because nothing 
>else could have caught the EMP at the exact same time a nuke shook the North 
>Tower so hard the North Tower shook like a tuning fork and was even recocord 
>on video.  DUH

Except there was no EMP.  Proof of that is they recorded the tower after
that interference event.  Oh, they still don't use AM for link video.

>> No matter, the transmitter and receiver would have been wiped out, AM or
>> not.

>Once again you have been watching too many bugs bunny cartoons or cartoons 
>from NIST because a real EMP weapon has to be detonated in the atmosphere 
>and not 77 meters underground.

It is true that a ground level or underground nuke has a shorter EMP range
than an aerial one.  A small ground level nuke has an EMP range of only 10
miles, while Starfish Prime affected Hawaii nearly 1000 miles away.
Now tell us what a 10 mile range EMP would have done to NYC.
Forget about the fried video cameras and crashing helicopters, tell us
what would happen to the rest of NYC!

>> What is
>> relevant are the many seismograph readings that did record the collapse
>> (likely including the shaking) as a 2.3 magnitude quake but no nuclear
>> detonation signature, thus disproving any nuke use.

>And the seismograph reading also don't show the North Tower shaking like a 
>tuning fork so they show clear evidence of being falsified.

The two "earthquakes" lasted several seconds, long enough to record the
shaking and the collapse itself.  But still no nuclear explosion
signature!

>>>> 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud.
>>
>>>Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud
>>>incase you didn't know.  And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom 
>>>cloud
>>>to say nukes.
>>
>> They do if they break through the ground, which they would have to do in
>> order to "vaporize" the towers.  But there were no fireballs and no
>> mushroom clouds spreading radiation everywhere.  So no nukes.

>ROTFLMAO because you can use the following site to see there are 
>consistencies in the mushroom cloud from Ground Zero and a mushroom cloud 
>from an underground nuke.
>><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm><

Still no fireball creating any mushroom cloud.

>>>> 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers.
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North
>>>Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not 
>>>caught
>>>on USGS Seismographs?  I wonder why.

No nuclear detonation signature shock on *any* seismometers.  Any.
Including ones the USGS had no access to, or even knew about.
None.

The shaking was recorded as part of the 2.3 magnitude earthquake.  But
still no nuclear detonation signature shock.

>> What about all the other seismographs worldwide that the USGS had no
>> control over?  You never answered this, because you can't.  No nuclear
>> detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear
>> detonation.  They did record all the shaking/collapse as a 2.3 magnitude
>> quake, however.

>Just stick to the facts that were the North Tower shook like a Tuning Fork 
>and people that felt it described it the exact same way they would decribe a 
>5.5 quake proving that all the seismic readings could be bogus.  And if the 
>people really behind 9/11 were international terrorist they could fix every 
>single seismic reading.

Nope, the fact is there was no nuclear detonation signature shock recorded
*anywhere*, and it would be completely impossible to "fix" every single
seismometer in the entire world.  They wouldn't even know where they all
were!

>>>Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied
>>>about Ground Zero why not the USGS too?
>>
>> Irrelevant.  No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph,
>> worldwide), so no nuclear detonation.  USGS can't change that no matter
>> how much they may have wanted to lie about anything.

>BULLSHIT the fact the North Tower shook so violently it was caught on camera 
>and at the same time another camera caught an explosion proves the seismic 
>reading are bullshit just like the rumor of the Twin Towers collapsing to 
>the ground or jet in Nuke York City are proven by the fact the only debris 
>on the ground is consistant with a bulding less than 10 floors high instead 
>of 110 stories tall.

Again, the shaking was recorded as part of the 2.3 magnitude quake.
The fact remains there was no nuclear detonation signature on *any* 
seismograph in the entire world.

>> Why such a k00ky Wikipedia URL?  Is it because that article wouldn't last
>> 5 seconds as a normal Wikipedia article before all the falsehoods were
>> corrected?  But it could exist by itself in some kooktard's sandbox?

>And yet you can't find anything wrong with it so you have to rely on others?

That site is so kooktarded I had no idea where to start.  Probably the
most ridiculous part of it is setting off a 150kT nuke only 77m deep 
(and 50m below a basement) and *not* expect it to blow out, spewing
radiation everywhere as a fireball rises 12,000 feet in the air.  Remember
the 104kT Sedan shot was 635 feet deep and it blew out, spewing radiation
everywhere.

>>>> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves
>>>> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and
>>>> dust.
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive 
>>>dirt
>>>hauled out.
>>
>> I already accounted for your 120 truckloads of dirt.  108,342 truckloads
>> hauled out minus 120 truckloads that were brought in = 108,222 truckloads
>> of actual debris hauled out.  How do you explain 108,222 truckloads of
>> debris (1.5 million tons!) if the towers were vaporized, k00k?

>All you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers to see very 
>little of that could have been from the Twin Towers themselves.  DUH.

I saw lots of debris.  Remember, up to street level is 70 feet deep.
Witnesses such as a doctor called in to amputate the leg of a trapped 
victim on the first day described the debris as 80-100' above that.

>>>And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because
>>>photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers.
>>
>> There's a lot of debris there (including lots of metal), k00k!  Why
>> don't you look at your own picture!!

>Dude the walls that were left standing of the Twin Towers were from 6 to 8 
>floors high.  If the debris had come down instead of floating away the 
>debris pile itself would have been much higher than the walls that were left 
>standing.

>The debris left is only consistant with a 10 story building and not a 110 
>story building so what happened to the debris from the other 100 floors? 
><G>

The debris rising to about concourse level of the tower would be 70 feet 
deep.

They still hauled out 108,342 truckloads, 1.5 million tons, over about
8 months.  That's pretty much what you'd expect from the site.

>> There are a zillion videos of the towers collapsing, k00k.  They all show
>> the towers collapsing from the impact floors down, not the bottom up.
>> And none of those videocams were disabled by EMPs!  None!

>But if you think they collapsed all the way to the ground you are really an 
>idiot especially after I've furnished proof that the falling debris couldn't 
>crush the walls that were left standing or the dozen or so people that 
>survived inside of Stairwell B of the North Tower because that debris was 
>ultra fine and floated away just as numerous photos show.  DUH

Yet it did fall down.  Your picture shows the debris reaching concourse
level, which is about right for 110 stories of 95% air collapsing down
to about 70 feet or so.

>>>> 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers 
>>>> *while
>>>> it was collapsing* weren't nuked.
>>
>>>Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but 
>>>there
>>>is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now.
>>
>> How can there be any radiation sickness if it's known for fact there was
>> no radiation?  I'm not discounting many people got sick, cancer etc. from
>> the toxic smoke, asbestos, dust (silicosis), fumes and so forth at
>> the site.  We know that it wasn't from radiation.

>Where the fcuk do you come up with that no radiation bullshit?

There simply was no radiation.  Slightly above background, that's it.
No radiation, no radiation sickness.  Those people got sick from the
smoke or asbestos.

>And the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" where another nuke was detonated was 
>filled with concrete to try and keep that radition down too.

That itty bitty pothole?  104kt nukes leave 1280' craters, not little
potholes.

>PLUS LOOK WHAT THEY PUT AT GROUND ZERO!!!  They put great big water 
>fountains up to try and wash away any remaining radition.  DUH.

That's totally stupid, even for a k00ktard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#518352 — Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael

Fromje suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where>
Date2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
SubjectRe: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael
Message-ID<charlie-gordon1492-C723F9.00035001092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>
In reply to#518347
In article <ms3hbs$uaq$1@pcls7.std.com>,
 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
> 
> >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
> >news:ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com...
> 
> >>>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation 
> >>>Area?"
> >>
> >> Except there wasn't.
> 
> >riiight.  Too bad you have no supporting evidence.
> 
> Can't prove a negative, k00ktard.  Besides, you made the outlandish claim,
> the burden of proof is on you.

http://www.lolhappens.com/276885/internet-argument/

-- 
Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#517737

Fromgilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Message-ID<mrte21$j3t$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#517648
On 8/29/2015 11:32 AM, Rocky wrote:


>>>>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma
>>>>> City was nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do
>>>>> the
>>>>> exact same
>>>>> thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE, AMERICANS HAVE DIED AND OUR GOVERNMENT
>>>>> HAS LIED
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ManBoobs.com/Rocky/thelyingSquerrily

>>>> Bwahahahaaa! Poor paranoid delusional schizophrenic kook is off his
>>>> meds and seeing nuclear detonations everywhere...
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass
>>> or if one were used on the North Tower.

>>> Now back to the link above.  Do you really think fertilizer bombs can
>>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire
>>> bombs?
>>> Do you really think a collapse of the Twin Towers can take the top
>>> 100+ floors of the Twin Towers and have them land somewhere else besides
>>> the area where they once stood?  See:
>>> http://www.DeformedManBoobs.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Buttblast3.jpeg

>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers
>>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies.
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>> no it doesn't
>
> Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual.
>
> Rocky
>

where is your evidence of radiation?  that would prove it was a nuke.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web