Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #266015
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Date | 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <ms3hbs$uaq$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <zLadne_kwcWMQ3zInZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com> <Ep6dne01wtVhz3_InZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com> <jKidnTS5IqHF4XnInZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation >>>Area?" >> >> Except there wasn't. >riiight. Too bad you have no supporting evidence. Can't prove a negative, k00ktard. Besides, you made the outlandish claim, the burden of proof is on you. >> More importantly, there was no radiation detected >> at Oklahoma City. That by itself is enough to disprove nuke kooktardery. >> Not to mention no seismometer readings with the distinct nuclear >> detonation signature. None. >And you heard about that by watching Bugs Bunny or the Roadrunner? In other >words it sure would be nice if you had some support for your bullshit. I just checked - you can get geiger counters for under $30 on Ebay. I had a surplus Cold War geiger counter when I was a kid. There are a lot of Geiger counters out there. If OKC was "hot", *someone* would have noticed by now. It would still be "hot" today.. The Trinity site is still "hot" 70+ years after the fact. Remember also that a ground or underground blast is dirtier than an aerial blast. Prompt neutron activation creates all kinds of radioactive crap from the surrounding rock/dirt. >And while I agree big nukes will leave a seismic reading what if all they >used were a bunch of smaller nukes like in Hoaxlahoma City? *All* nuclear blasts create a distinctive seismic signature. Seismometers world wide will detect it. There's no way the USGS or any other US agency can censor them all, especially ones in countries unfriendly to the US. There's no escaping detection of a nuclear blast. We've been telling you over and over and over again and you still don't get it. >And don't forget even though there are two videos that show something major >happened in Nuke York City why didn't any of the seismographs show the event >in question? Once again, they *did* register the event in question. One tower registered as a 2.3 on the Richter Scale, the other measured 2.1. >And don't forget my video. I have an AM reciver operated by WCBS that >recorded an EMP at the exact same time the explosion and the shaking took >place. <G> There was no EMP, kooktard. If there was, the EMP would be the end of the video. The camera would be fried and the WCBS chopper would be knocked out of the sky. This, too, has been explained to you over and over again. Oh, and once again, the video link from the chopper was FM, not AM. >>>> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark. Just small >>>> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the >>>> towers. >> >>>You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add >>>to >>>the lies from the media. >> >> Yup. No radiation detected. >riiight. They also didn't find evidence of explosives at Ground Zero and we >would find out later they didn't even look and I suspect the same holds true >for your radiation bullshit. "I suspect" - Hah! Once again, Geiger counters are dirt cheap. I'm sure lots of kooktards rushed to the World Trade Center site, Geiger counter in hand, eager to prove the WTC was nuked, only to be disappointed that their Geiger counters remained silent. Meanwhile, remember that video of the 104 kiloton nuke producing the 290 foot dome? That was the "Sedan" shot. It produced a 12,000' tall radioactive smoke column that went on to contaminate much of the US. It left a 1280 foot diameter crater that was too radioactive to enter for 7 months. Meanwhile, rescuers were searching "the Pile" looking for trapped victims that same day. That 104 kiloton shot blew out 12 million tons of earth, producing a base surge 5 miles in diameter, leaving behind that radioactive crater, even though they drilled down 635 feet below ground level to bury it. Imagine what it would do to NYC if set off in Lower Manhattan! And you claim there was a 150 kiloton nuke buried just a few meters below the towers? No, you claim there were something like 34 of them!!! 34 nukes that don't produce any radioactivity, don't produce any giant craters, don't produce any EMPs, don't produce any fireballs, and don't produce any mushroom clouds or 12,000 foot smoke columns! How kooktarded is that! >>>> 2) No EMPs detected. All electronics would have been fried, all >>>> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs. >> >>>I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP. >> >> There was *no* EMP at all. If there was, there would be no video of >> the collapses, helicopters would fall out of the air, etc. as all >> electronics in the area would be fried. >You have been watching too many Bugs Bunny Cartoons or maybe you have even >been watching the NIST cartoons since NIST produced cartoons too. Your attempt to evade doesn't change the fact there was no EMP. >>>I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS >>>chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground >>>under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera. >> >> They don't use AM for helicopter to ground station for video >And your evidence is what? They obviously had to use AM because nothing >else could have caught the EMP at the exact same time a nuke shook the North >Tower so hard the North Tower shook like a tuning fork and was even recocord >on video. DUH Except there was no EMP. Proof of that is they recorded the tower after that interference event. Oh, they still don't use AM for link video. >> No matter, the transmitter and receiver would have been wiped out, AM or >> not. >Once again you have been watching too many bugs bunny cartoons or cartoons >from NIST because a real EMP weapon has to be detonated in the atmosphere >and not 77 meters underground. It is true that a ground level or underground nuke has a shorter EMP range than an aerial one. A small ground level nuke has an EMP range of only 10 miles, while Starfish Prime affected Hawaii nearly 1000 miles away. Now tell us what a 10 mile range EMP would have done to NYC. Forget about the fried video cameras and crashing helicopters, tell us what would happen to the rest of NYC! >> What is >> relevant are the many seismograph readings that did record the collapse >> (likely including the shaking) as a 2.3 magnitude quake but no nuclear >> detonation signature, thus disproving any nuke use. >And the seismograph reading also don't show the North Tower shaking like a >tuning fork so they show clear evidence of being falsified. The two "earthquakes" lasted several seconds, long enough to record the shaking and the collapse itself. But still no nuclear explosion signature! >>>> 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud. >> >>>Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud >>>incase you didn't know. And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom >>>cloud >>>to say nukes. >> >> They do if they break through the ground, which they would have to do in >> order to "vaporize" the towers. But there were no fireballs and no >> mushroom clouds spreading radiation everywhere. So no nukes. >ROTFLMAO because you can use the following site to see there are >consistencies in the mushroom cloud from Ground Zero and a mushroom cloud >from an underground nuke. >><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm>< Still no fireball creating any mushroom cloud. >>>> 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers. >> >>>ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North >>>Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not >>>caught >>>on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. No nuclear detonation signature shock on *any* seismometers. Any. Including ones the USGS had no access to, or even knew about. None. The shaking was recorded as part of the 2.3 magnitude earthquake. But still no nuclear detonation signature shock. >> What about all the other seismographs worldwide that the USGS had no >> control over? You never answered this, because you can't. No nuclear >> detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear >> detonation. They did record all the shaking/collapse as a 2.3 magnitude >> quake, however. >Just stick to the facts that were the North Tower shook like a Tuning Fork >and people that felt it described it the exact same way they would decribe a >5.5 quake proving that all the seismic readings could be bogus. And if the >people really behind 9/11 were international terrorist they could fix every >single seismic reading. Nope, the fact is there was no nuclear detonation signature shock recorded *anywhere*, and it would be completely impossible to "fix" every single seismometer in the entire world. They wouldn't even know where they all were! >>>Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied >>>about Ground Zero why not the USGS too? >> >> Irrelevant. No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, >> worldwide), so no nuclear detonation. USGS can't change that no matter >> how much they may have wanted to lie about anything. >BULLSHIT the fact the North Tower shook so violently it was caught on camera >and at the same time another camera caught an explosion proves the seismic >reading are bullshit just like the rumor of the Twin Towers collapsing to >the ground or jet in Nuke York City are proven by the fact the only debris >on the ground is consistant with a bulding less than 10 floors high instead >of 110 stories tall. Again, the shaking was recorded as part of the 2.3 magnitude quake. The fact remains there was no nuclear detonation signature on *any* seismograph in the entire world. >> Why such a k00ky Wikipedia URL? Is it because that article wouldn't last >> 5 seconds as a normal Wikipedia article before all the falsehoods were >> corrected? But it could exist by itself in some kooktard's sandbox? >And yet you can't find anything wrong with it so you have to rely on others? That site is so kooktarded I had no idea where to start. Probably the most ridiculous part of it is setting off a 150kT nuke only 77m deep (and 50m below a basement) and *not* expect it to blow out, spewing radiation everywhere as a fireball rises 12,000 feet in the air. Remember the 104kT Sedan shot was 635 feet deep and it blew out, spewing radiation everywhere. >>>> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves >>>> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and >>>> dust. >> >>>ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive >>>dirt >>>hauled out. >> >> I already accounted for your 120 truckloads of dirt. 108,342 truckloads >> hauled out minus 120 truckloads that were brought in = 108,222 truckloads >> of actual debris hauled out. How do you explain 108,222 truckloads of >> debris (1.5 million tons!) if the towers were vaporized, k00k? >All you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers to see very >little of that could have been from the Twin Towers themselves. DUH. I saw lots of debris. Remember, up to street level is 70 feet deep. Witnesses such as a doctor called in to amputate the leg of a trapped victim on the first day described the debris as 80-100' above that. >>>And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because >>>photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers. >> >> There's a lot of debris there (including lots of metal), k00k! Why >> don't you look at your own picture!! >Dude the walls that were left standing of the Twin Towers were from 6 to 8 >floors high. If the debris had come down instead of floating away the >debris pile itself would have been much higher than the walls that were left >standing. >The debris left is only consistant with a 10 story building and not a 110 >story building so what happened to the debris from the other 100 floors? ><G> The debris rising to about concourse level of the tower would be 70 feet deep. They still hauled out 108,342 truckloads, 1.5 million tons, over about 8 months. That's pretty much what you'd expect from the site. >> There are a zillion videos of the towers collapsing, k00k. They all show >> the towers collapsing from the impact floors down, not the bottom up. >> And none of those videocams were disabled by EMPs! None! >But if you think they collapsed all the way to the ground you are really an >idiot especially after I've furnished proof that the falling debris couldn't >crush the walls that were left standing or the dozen or so people that >survived inside of Stairwell B of the North Tower because that debris was >ultra fine and floated away just as numerous photos show. DUH Yet it did fall down. Your picture shows the debris reaching concourse level, which is about right for 110 stories of 95% air collapsing down to about 70 feet or so. >>>> 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers >>>> *while >>>> it was collapsing* weren't nuked. >> >>>Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but >>>there >>>is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now. >> >> How can there be any radiation sickness if it's known for fact there was >> no radiation? I'm not discounting many people got sick, cancer etc. from >> the toxic smoke, asbestos, dust (silicosis), fumes and so forth at >> the site. We know that it wasn't from radiation. >Where the fcuk do you come up with that no radiation bullshit? There simply was no radiation. Slightly above background, that's it. No radiation, no radiation sickness. Those people got sick from the smoke or asbestos. >And the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" where another nuke was detonated was >filled with concrete to try and keep that radition down too. That itty bitty pothole? 104kt nukes leave 1280' craters, not little potholes. >PLUS LOOK WHAT THEY PUT AT GROUND ZERO!!! They put great big water >fountains up to try and wash away any remaining radition. DUH. That's totally stupid, even for a k00ktard.
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-01 13:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 20:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 21:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-31 02:59 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:44 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 09:56 +0100
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:08 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 15:53 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger now claims he actually won his suit. It was dismissed, meaning he lost) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger still doesn't understand the law) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Kid still doesn't understand the law at all ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Roger PROVES he still doesn't understand the law at all and that he FEARS offering an honest answer to questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:45 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah the stalker proves she is clearly lying now ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:42 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:41 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 09:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:21 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile that can't prove she is smart "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:39 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:58 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-31 14:34 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:35 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-28 12:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-28 15:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:20 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 09:56 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:32 +0100
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 02:40 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-09-03 02:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 02:47 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:07 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:38 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2015-08-30 08:29 -0700
csiph-web