Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #591143 > unrolled thread

No Mars travel for Mankind

Started bySergio <invalid@invalid.com>
First post2016-07-29 10:28 -0500
Last post2016-07-31 09:02 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 47 — 18 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-29 10:28 -0500
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:33 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-29 11:13 -0700
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:41 -0700
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-03 15:54 -0500
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-05 12:14 -0700
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 13:57 -0700
            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-09 14:23 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:24 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 12:23 -0700
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:54 -0700
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-30 15:07 +0000
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-30 17:24 -0500
            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-30 18:43 -0400
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-31 12:05 +0200
            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 08:59 -0500
              Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 09:07 -0500
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-31 18:12 +0000
                  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:47 -0700
            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-31 18:07 +0000
              Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-01 01:31 +0200
                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 08:46 -0700
                  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 11:02 -0700
                    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-01 15:51 -0700
                  Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-01 20:08 +0200
                    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 13:17 -0700
                      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-02 00:57 +0200
                        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-01 23:34 +0000
                          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 04:39 -0700
                            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-03 12:49 -0500
                              Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 06:50 -0700
                                Re: No Mars travel for Mankind "Eduardo Efftardo" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-08-06 13:27 -0700
                        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 16:49 -0700
                        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-02 12:13 +0000
            Re: No Mars travel for Mankind noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 12:40 -0700
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-29 22:19 +0000
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-29 17:40 -0500
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-29 22:55 +0000
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 06:54 -0700
    Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-07-29 19:20 -0400
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-30 00:22 +0000
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-30 19:09 +0000
          Re: No Mars travel for Mankind jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-30 23:20 +0000
    No Mars travel for Mankind HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:53 -0700
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-30 18:02 -0400
      Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-07-31 06:44 +0000
        Re: No Mars travel for Mankind Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 09:02 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →


#591441

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2016-08-01 01:31 +0200
Message-ID<1897027.irdbgypaU6@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#591381
Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote:

> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 12:05:18 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> The *only* proper term is “_far_ side of the Moon”
> 
> Only for a retarded idiot like you.
> 
> Historically and originally, the "far" side was called the
> "dark" side because of its completely unknown aspect.

You made that up the same way you made up your “name”.  IOW, you are a liar 
and a cranking troll.  Which was to be expected, but I wanted to give you 
the benefit of a doubt.  You have proven once again that it is a waste of 
time to try to reason with people who do not post with a real name and/or a 
real e-mail address.  FOAD.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591506

Fromfr314159@gmail.com
Date2016-08-01 08:46 -0700
Message-ID<861651c1-7e3f-42f2-b958-e436aeb36ed0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591441
On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 7:31:21 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> > 
> > Historically and originally, the "far" side was called the
> > "dark" side because of its completely unknown aspect.
> 
> You made that up 
>

I make nothing up:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_side_of_the_Moon

"the far side is also referred to as the dark side of the Moon,
originally in the sense of 'unknown' rather than lack of light"

Don't forget that it was not until the 1960s that the
far side was actually observed by human eyes.  Before
then it was totally hidden and unknown to astronomers
-- and the science of astronomy goes back a LONG way.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591520

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-01 11:02 -0700
Message-ID<52c13395-0129-4965-b59b-84117293009f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591506
On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 8:46:47 AM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 7:31:21 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Historically and originally, the "far" side was called the
> > > "dark" side because of its completely unknown aspect.
> > 
> > You made that up 
> >
> 
> I make nothing up:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_side_of_the_Moon
> 
> "the far side is also referred to as the dark side of the Moon,
> originally in the sense of 'unknown' rather than lack of light"
> 
> Don't forget that it was not until the 1960s that the
> far side was actually observed by human eyes.  Before
> then it was totally hidden and unknown to astronomers
> -- and the science of astronomy goes back a LONG way.

Dark side has more creators than the bright side  I'm looking at a picture   now  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591555

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-08-01 15:51 -0700
Message-ID<nnojtr$c6o$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#591520
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Cretin Glazier wrote:
> Dark side has more creators than the bright side  
> I'm looking at a picture   now  TreBert
>
hanson wrote:
Glazier, which _creator's_ picture is it that you are
looking at? What is it/she/he creating?
Glazier, since you said that "you know how everything
works", why are there so many, and what are the names 
of those __creators__?
>
Glazier you should be able to say so, given that..
>
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier whose G=EMC^2 is
short for "Glazier Exhibits Micro Cephalic Cretinism", (Zika
& or by his genetic ashkeNazi marker) defines Bert, reber
Trebert, or Treb the loud mouth, the Jewish Jailbird, the
Hatemonger, Liar, schizoid mental cripple, Pervert Face-Shitter,
criminal Graveyard vandal, Bigot, Racist, War-monger &
Communist :B::ert Glazier who introduces himself with/as....
>
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
:B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
:B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
:B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
:B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
:B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
:B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
:B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
:B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
:B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
:B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
about which ....
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
"Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
"Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
>
"Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
"Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
"Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
>
"reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
"reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
"reber, you don't believe in science."
>
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
"Harlow Campbell" succinctly added & wrote:
>
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker"....
"Bert you are senile, dazed & confused"
"Bert, you are Fucked in the head.
>
"Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike."
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
>
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
>
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot"... .... .... about which....
 >
Aviator Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
 >
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
>
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
>
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I know, you reber are an idiot. Glazier, you are babbling
desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for?
Stop it, either way.
 >
benj" Benjamin Franklin Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> who 
recently nymshifted to "B Gates" <nobodyxx@gmail>, wrote:
>
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is...
and promote that shitting into a bucket in a car is an achievement
that is a laudable accomplishment... and both being Communists
they demand entitlement to goods and services that were created
by hardworking people while they themselves drink, party and frolic!...
... still waiting "to be loved by all"...
>
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old Minnie Mouse van that you use as your residence
on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
 >
 "What are they gonna say when Swine Glazier dies? Are
they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
which Glazier, the Full-Swine, announced and posted at
the ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
>
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
 >
Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
Glazier proudly announced & posted...
 >
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always
post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after
which...
 >
Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
threatened...
 >
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
after...
>
(4)
The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
legs"...
 >
hanson wrote:
Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
"put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
legacy, is because:
 >
Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
.... "hanson made me famous"....
 >
hanson wrote
So, Glazier you Swine, you should be grateful to me & not wish
me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>
--- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
--- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>
which is why  the mental cripple <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>
badly needs to be administered to with
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> ...
>
Now Glazier, you filthy Swine, "you will never be loved by all"
but incredibly, Glazier, you have a few groupies who love you,
and haved become, voluntarily,  your personal slaves of you,
Faceshitter Glazier, who demonstrate their worship & their
devotion to their master Glazier, by lying under & literally
shit-eating Glazier's turds:
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
such as:
>
=1=
Sefton "john" <johnsefton288@gmail.com> the delusional
vegetarian loud-mouth from Canuckistan's town of Regina
is under the influence of his Lysergic- and  Solanine
contaminated diet and so Sefton lays himself with gusto
under Face-shitter Glazier's Sphincter and enjoys eating
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
and Sefton is impressed also with the Hate-mongering of
>
=2=
<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> is Iran's Glazier.
The Freak Muslime Mehram Maleki HATES Western
culture & the USA, hates Xtians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, 
even Sunnis.  Yet Maldrecki lays himself freely UNDER
the Sphincter of Face shitter Jew Glazier who bragged
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
to have _"PFM"_= "Poop For Maleki", which the gay, Iranian
Muslime, Maldrecki, consumed until he turned black
& posted his <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-Mehram-Selfie>
>
Then the 88 Year old Glazier announced that "Glazier is a
Transvestite who dons female dresses & a Sarah Palin mask,
saying that he has "nice legs"... which so impressed Maldrecki
that Maleki showed his devotion and solidarity by going LGBT
& had a Sex change operation, whose result she posted in
<http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-the-TG-Girl>.
>
=3=
"AA" <double-a3@hush.com>  is __Glazier's "Ass Angel"__,
aka "Abner Afterduft", the "Alcoholic  Addict" who struts with
his "AmoebA" brain, posted and yearns to be like Glazier, & 
AA doubles as Anon Yidd. Mouse", <nobody@home.invalid> 
who does NOT mind that Full-swine Glazier is a Face shitter 
& a criminal Grave yard vandal, Glazier who never recanted 
nor apologized for the overt threats Glazier made.... ....
>
...aux contraire, "Yidd Mouse", cum "AA", the Kike, comes to 
the defense &  aid of Full Swine Glazier's criminality, & worse, 
the Jewish Pig "Anon Yidd Mouse" cum "AA", curses folks that 
point at Glazier's behavior, which makes Yidd Mouse to be an "AA"
example of the lurid "Closeness" which the eminent Jewish Scholar 
Harold Wallace Rosenthal ||R:|| describes in his epic
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
wherein it says:
||R:|| We Jews have a solidarity & a closeness to
||R:|| fellow Jews like none other in the world.
||R:|| We Jews are always 'as one' when it counts.
>
||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect
||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies.
||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours.
||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows
||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim
>
=4=
Strangely, the Austrian Hitleryouth Halbmutt Wabnigger,
<hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> sides with Glazier too, but said:
____   "Jews are a residue of failed evolution" _______
>
=5=
Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>, the "Rectal Vacuumist (Seattle) is a criminal
Child-support dead-beat who greedily sucks turds out of Glazier's
sphincter, especially when they are Methamphetamine preloaded
as seen when Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>::JR:: wrote:
::JR:: I no longer want sex anymore.  I  masturbate. I've found  that
::JR:: all these erections & masturbations can irratate my prostate.
::JR:: My problem mostly happens a few hours before I want to
::JR:: wake up, so I can't take Sudafed.
::JR:: Ejaculation is a mind-altering drug, no better than heroin
::JR:: or meth.    So I've recently vowed to not masturbate...
::JR:: I use my left hand to smoke, masturbate and to type ...
::JR:: Does that make me smart ? --  I'd rather masturbate.
::JR:: She likes to squirt meth up her rear ( it makes her cum).
::JR:: but pussy is the last thing I want.
::::::: (cuz Relf is apparently interested now, with his "mouth wide
:::::::  open", to let Swine Glazier shit into Relf's "kisser")
::JR:: My dreams, however, have been semi-erotic as of late..."
>
=6=
... and even earlier, ironically, signed up was kike "Bodaisky",
<root@localhost.localdomain> who lied and claimed to be 
"Bo Dai" from China, but was in fact "Fagie Bodaisky", who 
lives off the tips he gets from being a rest-room attendant in 
a NY Bath house for gay Jews.
>
=7=
"Andrew Vecsey" posting as <trudi.schwander@gmail.com>
is another stinky & filthy AshkeNAZI, a twatt to boot, who enjoys
spending her time under Glazier's Sphincter like the ones above.
Like those pigs s/he does NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging
to be a Face shitter and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but
s/he objects and groans when that is pointed out & comes
runnning to defend and side with Full-Swine Glazier, just like
seen in =3= & <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
>
This bizarre perversion is well documented as seen here in:
<http://tinyurl.com/magnum-opus-the-rectal-jew>
<https://theendofzion.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/>
<https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=jewish+coprophilia>







 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591523

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2016-08-01 20:08 +0200
Message-ID<3011055.QJadu78ljV@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#591506
fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 7:31:21 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> wrote:
>> > Historically and originally, the "far" side was called the
>> > "dark" side because of its completely unknown aspect.
>> You made that up
> 
> I make nothing up:

Whereas “I” would be who, exactly?
 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_side_of_the_Moon

True, but your research method certainly allows for improvement.
 
> "the far side is also referred to as the dark side of the Moon,
> originally in the sense of 'unknown' rather than lack of light"

First of all, Wikipedia is a wiki-based encyclopedia; the key idea is that 
it can be edited by anyone, knowledgable and uninformed people alike.

Second, Wikipedia is not just any wiki; it follows the scientific approach 
(which results in its quality, comparable to that of the online version of 
the “Encyclopædia Britannica” in 2005, according to a “Nature” investigation 
[1]): statements in Wikipedia articles must be properly sourced in order to 
remain.  Obvious nonsense may be removed immediately; dubious statements 
should be, can be, and are in fact challenged.

Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance with 
Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is *immediately 
following that sentence*.

IOW, *maybe* not you, but certainly the person adding that part to the 
article *may* have made it up; until it is substantiated, we cannot know, 
and everyone has every right to remove it from the article or edit it to 
meet Wikipedia standards such as “no theory-finding” and “no original 
research”.  (I might edit it if there is not a reference for the statement 
soon.  Because – I will assume in your favor – you have overlooked or 
disregarded the “[citation needed]” link already, I have added a better 
visible warning on top of that article.)

[1] <http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html>

> Don't forget that it was not until the 1960s that the
> far side was actually observed by human eyes.  Before
> then it was totally hidden and unknown to astronomers
> -- and the science of astronomy goes back a LONG way.

While that is true, for example Johannes Kepler (16th century CE) already 
knew that the far/back side of the Moon was not always dark.  So there was 
no reason to call it the “dark side”, except by people who have no clue what 
they are talking about (whom, in this *scientific* newsgroup, we do not take 
as a measure of correctness).

As you can read *sourced* in

,-<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon#Appearance_from_Earth>
| 
| […]
| The far side is often inaccurately called the "dark side", but in fact, it 
| is illuminated as often as the near side: once per lunar day, during the 
| new moon phase we observe on Earth when the near side is dark.[118]
| […]
| [118] Phil Plait. "Dark Side of the Moon". Bad Astronomy:Misconceptions. 
|       Retrieved 15 February 2010.

(Notice how the referred source is categorized *by its author*.  I think an 
apology to me by you is in order now.)

Finally, ISTM that, supported by the unsourced statement, you are committing 
a historian’s fallacy here.  Just because there is the term of “dark energy” 
in cosmology *now* (which really refers to “unknown”), there need not have 
been a term of “dark side of the Moon” to mean “unknown side of the Moon”.

HTH

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591540

Fromfr314159@gmail.com
Date2016-08-01 13:17 -0700
Message-ID<f1de3836-ab52-400a-89ab-d5d6e326cb73@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591523
On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:08:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> 
> Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance with 
> Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is *immediately 
> following that sentence*.
> 

You should read again.  The first three references given, [1][2][3], all
attest to the "dark" side as the unknown side.


Yet another:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/06/140609122056.htm

"when the Soviet spacecraft Luna 3 transmitted the first images
of the 'dark' side of the moon back to Earth. It was called the
dark side because it was unknown, not because sunlight does not
reach it."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591557

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2016-08-02 00:57 +0200
Message-ID<3238968.MHq7AAxBmi@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#591540
fr314159@gmail.com wrote:

> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:08:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> wrote:
>> Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance
>> with Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is
>> *immediately following that sentence*.
> 
> You should read again.  The first three references given, [1][2][3], all
> attest to the "dark" side as the unknown side.

The first one attests to a common misconception perpetuated by the title of 
a Pink Floyd album based on a common English idiom based on Mark Twain 
having the same misconception, that is used as a catchphrase in a daily 
newspaper.

The second one reiterates that the term is merely the result of a 
misconception, and uses “dark” merely as a catchphrase in the title.  
Further below, we find wishful thinking and the same /post hoc est propter 
hoc/ fallacy as yours in the comment of a Mike Hopkins.

The third one ranges among the lowest quality of journalism wherein the 
author actually implies that NASA needed LRO to find out that the far side 
was not always dark, the author projecting their own ignorance.

> Yet another:

… unsourced statement, yes.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591562

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-08-01 23:34 +0000
Message-ID<bs257d-q6l.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#591557
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:08:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>> wrote:
>>> Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance
>>> with Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is
>>> *immediately following that sentence*.
>> 
>> You should read again.  The first three references given, [1][2][3], all
>> attest to the "dark" side as the unknown side.
> 
> The first one attests to a common misconception perpetuated by the title of 
> a Pink Floyd album based on a common English idiom based on Mark Twain 
> having the same misconception, that is used as a catchphrase in a daily 
> newspaper.

Incorrect or not, misconception or not, it has been a fairly common
phrase in the English language for well over a hundred years and while
astronomers may wince, everyone knows what it means.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591746

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-03 04:39 -0700
Message-ID<1e0eb5e0-021e-4179-ad43-4298227f8492@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591562
On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 7:46:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> > fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> >> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:08:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> >> wrote:
> >>> Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance
> >>> with Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is
> >>> *immediately following that sentence*.

Thomas, I support your goal of people should post using their real identity.
Before you over react, I get your Spoc_I_Hold_No_Feelings_Stance, just save it.
Your “I have no feelings, I'm just your logicMachineCallMePointedEars” is cute.
People always have, always will, interact on Usenet without reading its charter.
Screw the Wikipedia’s quality standards. Lighten up, relativistically speaking.

> >> You should read again.  The first three references given, [1][2][3], all
> >> attest to the "dark" side as the unknown side.
> > 
> > The first one attests to a common misconception perpetuated by the title of 
> > a Pink Floyd album based on a common English idiom based on Mark Twain 
> > having the same misconception, that is used as a catchphrase in a daily 
> > newspaper.
> 
> Incorrect or not, misconception or not, it has been a fairly common
> phrase in the English language for well over a hundred years and while
> astronomers may wince, everyone knows what it means.

As I understand it, as it is, the Moon's spin rate is such that the
same hemisphere of the Moon always points towards the Earth. Tidal
Locking or synchronous rotation. Therefore, we never see the farside
from the ground. Hence the idiom 'The Dark Side Of The Moon.' That the
word 'dark' is a multifaceted homonym... well good luck to busybodies
Engineers/Scientists/Physicists/... == ESP who would aspire to change
homonymity within English. Then they ought fiddle with Chinese/Hindi/...

The Language of Physics is not set in OneStone. Period.
Even math notation varies from one department to another.
Example: in Golf 72-72 equals 144, not 0. Do the math.

Recently astronomers, by hand raising votes, demoted Pluto from being a planet.
So there may be hope for ESPs to freeze solid the meanings of homonyms? No.

Poets Pink Floyd's great line: as a matter of fact, it's all dark Dark DARK.
Pink Floyd on identity: By the way... which one is Pink? Have a cigar...

> -- 
> Jim Pennino

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

Homonymit(y)? Sometimes I handDraw words, it's a game I play. NTYA.
NTYA == Not That You Asked ... sometimes I game up acronyms too. NTYA.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591754

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-08-03 12:49 -0500
Message-ID<nntarh$j8l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#591746
On 8/3/2016 6:39 AM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 7:46:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
>>> fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:08:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance
>>>>> with Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is
>>>>> *immediately following that sentence*.
>
> Thomas, I support your goal of people should post using their real identity.
> Before you over react, I get your Spoc_I_Hold_No_Feelings_Stance, just save it.
> Your “I have no feelings, I'm just your logicMachineCallMePointedEars” is cute.
> People always have, always will, interact on Usenet without reading its charter.
> Screw the Wikipedia’s quality standards. Lighten up, relativistically speaking.
>
>>>> You should read again.  The first three references given, [1][2][3], all
>>>> attest to the "dark" side as the unknown side.
>>>
>>> The first one attests to a common misconception perpetuated by the title of
>>> a Pink Floyd album based on a common English idiom based on Mark Twain
>>> having the same misconception, that is used as a catchphrase in a daily
>>> newspaper.
>>
>> Incorrect or not, misconception or not, it has been a fairly common
>> phrase in the English language for well over a hundred years and while
>> astronomers may wince, everyone knows what it means.

> As I understand it, as it is, the Moon's spin rate is such that the
> same hemisphere of the Moon always points towards the Earth. Tidal
> Locking or synchronous rotation. Therefore, we never see the farside
> from the ground. Hence the idiom 'The Dark Side Of The Moon.' That the
> word 'dark' is a multifaceted homonym... well good luck to busybodies
> Engineers/Scientists/Physicists/... == ESP who would aspire to change
> homonymity within English. Then they ought fiddle with Chinese/Hindi/...
>
> The Language of Physics is not set in OneStone. Period.
> Even math notation varies from one department to another.
> Example: in Golf 72-72 equals 144, not 0. Do the math.
>
> Recently astronomers, by hand raising votes, demoted Pluto from being a planet.
> So there may be hope for ESPs to freeze solid the meanings of homonyms? No.
>
> Poets Pink Floyd's great line: as a matter of fact, it's all dark Dark DARK.
> Pink Floyd on identity: By the way... which one is Pink? Have a cigar...
>
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
>
> -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”
>
> Homonymit(y)? Sometimes I handDraw words, it's a game I play. NTYA.
> NTYA == Not That You Asked ... sometimes I game up acronyms too. NTYA.
>

it is dark because no reflected light from the other side of the moon 
reaches men's eyes, therfore it is dark.  (also women's eyes, and all 
those who have eyes, bugs, shrimps, frogs, regendered, etc)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591960

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 06:50 -0700
Message-ID<95045c52-0668-44c1-9a4a-837e45de9bb5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591754
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 1:49:42 PM UTC-4, Sergio wrote:
> On 8/3/2016 6:39 AM, Mahipal wrote:
> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 7:46:05 PM UTC-4, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
> >>> fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:08:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance
> >>>>> with Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is
> >>>>> *immediately following that sentence*.
> >
> > Thomas, I support your goal of people should post using their real identity.
> > Before you over react, I get your Spoc_I_Hold_No_Feelings_Stance, just save it.
> > Your “I have no feelings, I'm just your logicMachineCallMePointedEars” is cute.
> > People always have, always will, interact on Usenet without reading its charter.
> > Screw the Wikipedia’s quality standards. Lighten up, relativistically speaking.
> >
> >>>> You should read again.  The first three references given, [1][2][3], all
> >>>> attest to the "dark" side as the unknown side.
> >>>
> >>> The first one attests to a common misconception perpetuated by the title of
> >>> a Pink Floyd album based on a common English idiom based on Mark Twain
> >>> having the same misconception, that is used as a catchphrase in a daily
> >>> newspaper.
> >>
> >> Incorrect or not, misconception or not, it has been a fairly common
> >> phrase in the English language for well over a hundred years and while
> >> astronomers may wince, everyone knows what it means.
> 
> > As I understand it, as it is, the Moon's spin rate is such that the
> > same hemisphere of the Moon always points towards the Earth. Tidal
> > Locking or synchronous rotation. Therefore, we never see the farside
> > from the ground. Hence the idiom 'The Dark Side Of The Moon.' That the
> > word 'dark' is a multifaceted homonym... well good luck to busybodies
> > Engineers/Scientists/Physicists/... == ESP who would aspire to change
> > homonymity within English. Then they ought fiddle with Chinese/Hindi/...
> >
> > The Language of Physics is not set in OneStone. Period.
> > Even math notation varies from one department to another.
> > Example: in Golf 72-72 equals 144, not 0. Do the math.
> >
> > Recently astronomers, by hand raising votes, demoted Pluto from being a planet.
> > So there may be hope for ESPs to freeze solid the meanings of homonyms? No.
> >
> > Poets Pink Floyd's great line: as a matter of fact, it's all dark Dark DARK.
> > Pink Floyd on identity: By the way... which one is Pink? Have a cigar...
> >
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”
> >
> > Homonymit(y)? Sometimes I handDraw words, it's a game I play. NTYA.
> > NTYA == Not That You Asked ... sometimes I game up acronyms too. NTYA.
> >
> it is dark because no reflected light from the other side of the moon 
> reaches men's eyes, therfore it is dark.  (also women's eyes, and all 
> those who have eyes, bugs, shrimps, frogs, regendered, etc)

I feel you Sir SergioJi, J.R.R.TolkienJi... and in The DarkNess bind them...

This Hindi song captures a similar sentiment. Just a great song!
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=ek+andhera+lakh+sitare 
I played it for my English Speaking Only friends... they loved it!

ek+andhera+lakh+sitare == one+darkness+(trillions)^3!+stars

Here's the full translated version of the lyrics/poem. I won't leave
it for you to search for ... besides, given I can't find any
translation of said Darkness Song, I might have to translate it
myself!  Oye ve... you guys are really in trouble, if I have to...

Ok, you got me, lakh is only hundreds of thousands. I miscalculated!

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592115

From"Eduardo Efftardo" <invalid@example.com>
Date2016-08-06 13:27 -0700
Message-ID<no5h7g$163q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#591960
Mahipal quotidian shitpost

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591564

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-08-01 16:49 -0700
Message-ID<579FE00C.B51@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#591557
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> fr314159@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:08:45 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> > wrote:
> >> Third, if you *continue reading*, you will notice that, in accordance
> >> with Wikipedia’s quality standards, the link “[citation needed]” is
> >> *immediately following that sentence*.
> >
> > You should read again.  The first three references given, [1][2][3], all
> > attest to the "dark" side as the unknown side.
> 
> The first one attests to a common misconception perpetuated by the title of
> a Pink Floyd album based on a common English idiom based on Mark Twain
> having the same misconception, that is used as a catchphrase in a daily
> newspaper.
> 
> The second one reiterates that the term is merely the result of a
> misconception, and uses “dark” merely as a catchphrase in the title.
> Further below, we find wishful thinking and the same /post hoc est propter
> hoc/ fallacy as yours in the comment of a Mike Hopkins.
> 
> The third one ranges among the lowest quality of journalism wherein the
> author actually implies that NASA needed LRO to find out that the far side
> was not always dark, the author projecting their own ignorance.


You mean 'science journalist'...yes, they are the lowest quality among
journalist in other fields.


Science journalist just write what NASA tells them to write....word by
word.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591627

FromAdlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us>
Date2016-08-02 12:13 +0000
Message-ID<nnq2oi01lan@news3.newsguy.com>
In reply to#591557
On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:57:52 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:


> 
>> Yet another:
> 
> … unsourced statement, yes.
>

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Of course it's un-sourced.

Sourcing it would be like trying to document the
use of the word "cool" as a synonym for "good,
outstanding, excellent."  IOW, it's a job for
idiots.

I think it's time for you to schedule a brain
scan.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591900

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-04 12:40 -0700
Message-ID<a6ad5b50-e81a-4426-9b0e-30b9b368f90d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591368
it is 6 a.m to six p.m,
about a halfmonth

> The *only* proper term is “_far_ side of the Moon” as the far side is not 
> always dark (in shadow).  In particular, there is “noon” on the far side 
> whenever there is new moon for the observer.
> 
> > is an ideal location for astronomical observation.
> 
> It depends.  On the far side there is also a greater risk for meteoroid 
> impacts destroying such equipment.
> 
> > Scientific outposts, mostly automated, should be established there.  Radio
> > astronomy would benefit greatly from the total absence of man-made
> > terrestrial noise.
> 
> Would radio noise really be absent?  Consider the Deep Space Network already 
> established.
> 
> > Also, if fusion power is ever to become dominant, we will need to mine
> > the moon for its helium.
> 
> “The Moon's surface contains helium-3 at concentrations on the order of 10 
> ppb [parts per billion]” (Wikipedia [1]).  That is, in 10 kg of lunar 
> regolith there are 100 ng (nanograms) of helium-3.
> 
> [1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium#Isotopes>
> 
> > These highly worthwhile endeavors […]
> 
> How much lunar regolith does one have to mine before it becomes worthwhile 
> to be mined for fusion power?
> 
> > But instead of preparing for these reasonable eventualities we are
> > wasting valuable time and resources in speculations on a misplaced
> > and futile mission to Mars.
> 
> The Mars mission is not misplaced and futile.  Like the Moon landing, it is
> going to spur innovation in various fields; in fact, it does that already as 
> we observe the ISS being the testbed of it.  Just think of the scope of that 
> project, and the organizational, technical, and scientific knowledge that 
> have to be gained, and skills that have to be attained, in order to 
> accomplish it.
> 
> > What fools we human be.
> 
> It takes one to know one.
> 
> -- 
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591218

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-07-29 22:19 +0000
Message-ID<ed1t6d-45o.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#591187
Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 10:29:04 AM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:
>> Artical in todays WSJ on page 2, says  space radiation causes heart 
>> disease,
>> 
>> former astronoughts were studied
>> 
>> And they were in space a average of only 15 days
>> 
>> weightlessness and radiation made blood vessels stiff
>> 
>> 
>> forget Moon, Mars etc.
> 
> Our next step's back to the moon.   If we can survive in a colony on
> the Moon, they we'll see.

Why?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591219

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-29 17:40 -0500
Message-ID<nngm0d$144h$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#591218
On 7/29/2016 5:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 10:29:04 AM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:
>>> Artical in todays WSJ on page 2, says  space radiation causes heart
>>> disease,
>>>
>>> former astronoughts were studied
>>>
>>> And they were in space a average of only 15 days

>>> weightlessness and radiation made blood vessels stiff
>>>
>>>
>>> forget Moon, Mars etc.
>>
>> Our next step's back to the moon.   If we can survive in a colony on
>> the Moon, they we'll see.
>
> Why?
>
>

they could farm crops in that moon dirt, all you need is water, 
atmosphere, atmospheric pressure, neutrents, perhaps some radiation 
protection.

we could send prisoners up there first.  Dr's could use their iPads for 
remote diognosing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591220

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-07-29 22:55 +0000
Message-ID<6f3t6d-neo.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#591219
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 7/29/2016 5:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 10:29:04 AM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Artical in todays WSJ on page 2, says  space radiation causes heart
>>>> disease,
>>>>
>>>> former astronoughts were studied
>>>>
>>>> And they were in space a average of only 15 days
> 
>>>> weightlessness and radiation made blood vessels stiff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> forget Moon, Mars etc.
>>>
>>> Our next step's back to the moon.   If we can survive in a colony on
>>> the Moon, they we'll see.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
> 
> they could farm crops in that moon dirt, all you need is water, 
> atmosphere, atmospheric pressure, neutrents, perhaps some radiation 
> protection.

Don't forget tractors.

> we could send prisoners up there first.  Dr's could use their iPads for 
> remote diognosing.

I see you have never read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress - Robert A. Heinlein.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591641

Fromosbornfg@gmail.com
Date2016-08-02 06:54 -0700
Message-ID<e8d528e1-db8c-4af3-a329-696728cded14@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591219
>they could farm crops in that moon dirt, all you need is water, 
atmosphere, atmospheric pressure, neutrents, perhaps some radiation 
>
I'm the book ,The Martian, by Andy Weir, The author explores this in depth, Its sounded really well thought out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591223

FromYousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
Date2016-07-29 19:20 -0400
Message-ID<4sidnYJqBoVceQbKnZ2dnUU7-U_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#591143
On 29/07/2016 11:28 AM, Sergio wrote:
> Artical in todays WSJ on page 2, says  space radiation causes heart
> disease,
>
> former astronoughts were studied
>
> And they were in space a average of only 15 days
>
> weightlessness and radiation made blood vessels stiff
>
>
> forget Moon, Mars etc.

At least until we can get shielding technology better.

	Yousuf Khan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web