Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #693041 > unrolled thread
| Started by | cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-07 20:55 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-07-09 02:40 -0400 |
| Articles | 7 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) - 2018-07-07 20:55 -0400
Re: Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) - 2018-07-07 21:30 -0400
Re: Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) - 2018-07-07 22:19 -0400
Re:Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-07-08 06:11 +0200
Re: Re:Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) - 2018-07-08 01:14 -0400
Re: Re:Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-07-08 07:30 +0200
Re: Re:Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) - 2018-07-09 02:40 -0400
| From | cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-07 20:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Partial pressure of O2, CO2, etc., in Thailand cave |
| Message-ID | <a3TEG7FpUeMY@eisner.encompasserve.org> |
Regarding flooded caves and partial pressures of key gases. Lots of people want to talk about the current situation at Doi Nang Non mountain but some have special knowledge that might be tapped. Currently there are dicussions about the low oxygen partial pressure (percentage, presumably by volume) of 15% at the team's location compared to a normal value of 21%, this new level already at the point where it can be causing some impairment. Sites like this one have graphic froms which one might hope to inferred at least some sort of scale information (beware possible wrap of URL): www.cbsnews.com/news/thailand-cave-rescue-latest-updates-today-officials-appear-close-to-launching-rescue-mission-2018-07-07/ Now if water volume is lowered and air volume is increased by the same amount, something must occur to make up the difference. According to South Dakota School of Mines these are limestone formations and therefore quite porous, and, in fact, diffusion through the limestone may be a major source of replenishment of the removed water during the monsoon season. So what is happening in the air spaces to deal with the increased air volume? Possibilities: o Concomitant lowering of pressure while relative pressures remain the same? o Ditto, except P_H20 remains constant (partial pressure H2O at maximum value for given temperature). o Combination effects, with, say chemical reactions or outgassing, changing the contributions of other gasses as well. I am here ignoring the partial pressure of CO2. Of course it will be going up as O2 is consumed by the humans in the cavity, but since some of the waste product of energy production in the body is H2O, there should be a smaller volume of CO2 produced than O2 consumed, say, roughly, 2:1. Finally, between two sealed cavities, does not a water-filled connecting tunnel act like a manometer so that water level will rise in the lower pressure chamber relative to the higher pressure chamber? Does that mean that if the chamber containing the team is smaller its water level may remain higher and air volume lower as the water in the other chambers is drained? Maybe this is moot because of the permeability of the limestone in which they are presumably embedded. George
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-07 21:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kSE$1Yc8HXQ0@eisner.encompasserve.org> |
| In reply to | #693041 |
In article <a3TEG7FpUeMY@eisner.encompasserve.org>, cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) writes: > Regarding flooded caves and partial pressures of key gases. > > Lots of people want to talk about the current situation at > Doi Nang Non mountain but some have special knowledge that > might be tapped. In view of the fact that this really is a life or death situation, could we at least in the early stages of this defer to those who have a really authoritative knowledge on one of these subjects? I have stated my thoughts as a starting point but do not have special knowledge beyond first year college chemistry and physics and whatever I know of thermodynamics and classical mechanics, and I know nothing to speak of about caves or geology. Also, sorry for the typos... that last second edit always gets me into trouble. George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-07 22:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <F$FciPkbA32t@eisner.encompasserve.org> |
| In reply to | #693041 |
In article [...], cornelius@eisner.decus.org writes: > Sites like this one have graphic froms which one might hope[...] Demangled: "Sites like this one have graphics from which one might hope to infer at least some sort of scale information: www.cbsnews.com/news/thailand-cave-rescue-latest-updates-today-officials-appear -close-to-launching-rescue-mission-2018-07-07/" George
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-08 06:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <phs2tm$n6k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #693041 |
cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) Wrote in message: >. > > I am here ignoring the partial pressure of CO2. Of course it > will be going up as O2 is consumed by the humans in the cavity, > but since some of the waste product of energy production in the > body is H2O, there should be a smaller volume of CO2 produced > than O2 consumed, say, roughly, 2:1. > The major metabolic source of energy - oxidation of glucose - has the total chemical reaction as C6H12O6(glucose) + 6 O2 --> 6 H2O + 6 CO2., Therefore 1:1 For fat, it can be simplified by ommiting the minor glycerol ester part as just 2 (CH2)n + 3n O2 --> 2n CO2 + 2n H2O, so 3:2. Large portion of CO2 will be dissolving in water, some small part of it dissolving the limestone CO2 + H2O + CaCO3 --> Ca(HCO3)2 The relative humidity will be close to 100%, absolute humidity in g/me will be near constant as well as temperature. Excessive water vapour will eventually condense. The eventual pressure decrease due decrease of total amount of gasses will be mostly eliminated by sucking air via limestone porosity and sucking water to decrease volume and increase pressure. These effects lead to both absolute and partial pressure increase of air gasses but CO2, which partial pressure increase will be much smaller. 1 % of CO2 reportedly start causing breathing problem, as increased CO level on blood trigger response of hypothalamus to intensify breathing to get rid of it . 10 % has already an anaesthetic effect. ( Quotes Q&A source ) The questing remains, what was the initial oxygen concentration before flooding. Even if the internal space was directly connected to open air, the cave system is long enough to differ from average air concentration. E.g oxygen can be spent by oxidation of iron and manganese minerals and by cave life forms. -- Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer) "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity." Miloš Forman ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-08 01:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <axU$GPEZqWM$@eisner.encompasserve.org> |
| In reply to | #693057 |
In article <phs2tm$n6k$1@dont-email.me>, Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> writes: > cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) Wrote in message: >> I am here ignoring the partial pressure of CO2. Of course it >> will be going up as O2 is consumed by the humans in the cavity, >> but since some of the waste product of energy production in the >> body is H2O, there should be a smaller volume of CO2 produced >> than O2 consumed, say, roughly, 2:1. > The major metabolic source of energy - oxidation of glucose - has > the total chemical reaction as > C6H12O6(glucose) + 6 O2 --> > 6 H2O + 6 CO2., Therefore 1:1 Thank you. I had completely forgotten that sugars have a large number of oxygen atoms. Don't recall ever memorizing the chemical formula for glucose although I at one time could tell you one of the others - I suppose sucrose. > For fat, it can be simplified by ommiting the minor glycerol > ester part as just > 2 (CH2)n + 3n O2 --> 2n CO2 + 2n H2O, > so 3:2. > > Large portion of CO2 will be dissolving in water, some small part > of it dissolving the limestone > CO2 + H2O + CaCO3 --> Ca(HCO3)2 Yes, I had long since forgotten the reaction that transforms aqueous CO2 and CaCO3 into limestone, but I knew it existed. And I did expect at least some of the CO2 to dissolve in water. In any case, the outcome is similar to what I proposed, that O2 relative percentages decrease while CO2 changes are not as significant, and this is good because the feeling of suffocation you get in confined spaces is apparently due to excess CO2 and not the lack of oxygen. > The relative humidity will be close to 100%, absolute humidity > in g/me will be near constant as well as temperature. Excessive > water vapour will eventually condense. My assumption as well. > The eventual pressure decrease due decrease of total amount of > gasses will be mostly eliminated by sucking air via limestone > porosity and sucking water to decrease volume and increase > pressure. These effects lead to both absolute and partial > pressure increase of air gasses but CO2, which partial pressure > increase will be much smaller. OK, so porosity effects do apply. As the monsoon season progesses is it possible the limestone becomes closer to being saturated with water and less capable of bearing oxygen and other gases? > 1 % of CO2 reportedly start causing breathing problem, as > increased CO level on blood trigger response of hypothalamus to > intensify breathing to get rid of it . > 10 % has already an anaesthetic effect. ( Quotes Q&A source ) > > The questing remains, what was the initial oxygen concentration > before flooding. Even if the internal space was directly > connected to open air, the cave system is long enough to differ > from average air concentration. E.g oxygen can be spent by > oxidation of iron and manganese minerals and by cave life > forms. Difficult to know unless someone has studied it in the past or someone is routinely recording such things over time. And I doubt if the divers, upon arriving initially, might have both collected an air sample and measured absolute air pressure. I have heard that there were later readings after the reported 15% O2 number and that it has climbed back up to 17%. Perhaps there has been some oxygen replenishment. Plus, despite indications that attempts to run an oxygen line to the cavern had been abandoned, there are reports that there was at least some oxygen transferred, presumably not by carrying in oxygen tanks, in the last few days. George > -- > Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer) > > "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity." > Miloš Forman > > > ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- > http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-08 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <phs7ia$fot$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #693064 |
cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) Wrote in message: > In article <phs2tm$n6k$1@dont-email.me>, Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> writes: >> > > > > > > OK, so porosity effects do apply. As the monsoon season > progesses is it possible the limestone becomes closer to > being saturated with water and less capable of bearing > oxygen and other gases? I do not think so. There is lot of soil separating atmosphere and limestone and there is lot of soil gas. Additionally, there is diffusion of dissolved gases into limedtone pores. > >> > > > I have heard that there were later readings after the reported > 15% O2 number and that it has climbed back up to 17%. Perhaps > there has been some oxygen replenishment. Plus, despite > indications that attempts to run an oxygen line to the > cavern had been abandoned, there are reports that there > was at least some oxygen transferred, presumably not by > carrying in oxygen tanks, in the last few days. > There was an explicit report one diver died along the back route after transporting some oxygen tanks. The gas tube would be nice to have, but I suppose it would extremely difficult to transport all the length. > >> -- >> Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer) >> >> "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity." >> Miloš Forman >> >> >> ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- >> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ > -- Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer) "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity." Miloš Forman ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-09 02:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ELe9hkXcMIjU@eisner.encompasserve.org> |
| In reply to | #693065 |
In article <phs7ia$fot$1@dont-email.me>, Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> writes: > cornelius@eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) Wrote in message: >> OK, so porosity effects do apply. As the monsoon season >> progesses is it possible the limestone becomes closer to >> being saturated with water and less capable of bearing >> oxygen and other gases? > > I do not think so. There is lot of soil separating atmosphere and > limestone and there is lot of soil gas. > Additionally, there is diffusion of dissolved gases into > limedtone pores. Thanks so much for your insightful comments. I had hoped to get some ideas from people in this group that understood the issues since the authorities on the ground appeared to have reversed themselves on the viability of leaving the team in the cavern for an extended period and you have more than met my expectations with regard to that. Now that the decision has been made and they are now on their way towards removing the second group of four boys from the cave, I suppose this line of reasoning is now moot, but thanks for responding with such valuable information. George
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web