Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #703635 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 45 participants
Thread has 1097 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1097 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-29 15:43 -0700
Double-A, Nov 2008. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 17:06 -0700
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:34 -0400
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:54 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:15 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-24 15:34 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
"God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
"God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:33 -0700
An IQ of 185. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 06:41 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
Page 9 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 50 Next page →
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <popa14$4k5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #705214 |
On 9/29/2018 8:29 PM, Lunar Opticfibre wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 1:41 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 9/29/18 11:55 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:52:25 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/29/18 7:23 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:34:12 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
>>>>>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything
>>>>>>> nice")
>>>>>>> as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten
>>>>>>> all of
>>>>>>> them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive toxic
>>>>>>> masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>>>>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right
>>>>>>>> to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
>>>>>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>
>>>>> Boy am I glad that I have that feminist in my killfile.
>>>>>
>>>>> If men were as feminine as they want us all to be, they would have
>>>>> become Islamic sex slaves in much like the women living in the coastal
>>>>> areas of Europe where the Moslems attacked most frequently. In
>>>>> reality,
>>>>> women must be feminine and men must be masculine. If people like her
>>>>> can't take it, they are free not to marry and never to have any
>>>>> kind of
>>>>> sexual relations.
>>>>
>>>> How about saying they and others are free to live their lives as they
>>>> wish as long as they are not hurting others. Why not back equal rights.
>>>
>>> Because then he'd lose some of his male privilege.
>>>
>>
>> We see this repeatedly in history: when blacks were no longer enslaved
>> (or at least not as easily and legally), when they were able to vote,
>> when they could drink from the same water fountains and sit in the
>> same seats, when women could vote, when women gained greater levels of
>> equality in the workplace and in ownership rights, when Christians
>> were no longer allowed to push their religion onto others as easily --
>> and now when gays are granted equality in the right to marry and
>> Muslims are seeking equal rights, we see those who have grown used to
>> their privileged position push back and claim to be victims.
>>
>> In the long run those demanding these special entitlements tend to
>> lose. It takes a generation or so.
>>
>> The bigger concern to me is the growing income inequality. We are not
>> too far from the time when the 1% will own 99% of the wealth and the
>> 99% merely 1% of it. Our oligarchy -- and the spread of it around the
>> globe -- is of a bigger concern to me. Not sure how that will play
>> out. Wealth is power -- and when 1% has 99% of the power (or even
>> close, as we are now) things are not good and violence is more likely.
>>
>
> Yes.
No.
Marxists like Snit have no clue. They are all about totalitarian forcing
of equality (usually by killing lots of people) when in fact that few
people have nearly all the money (or few people do most of the work) is
a law of nature.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0iL0ixoZYo
Pareto distribution.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <g1atjaFq63jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #705228 |
On 9/29/18 6:48 PM, benj wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 8:29 PM, Lunar Opticfibre wrote:
>> On 9/29/2018 1:41 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/29/18 11:55 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:52:25 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/29/18 7:23 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:34:12 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
>>>>>>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and
>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>> nice")
>>>>>>>> as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten
>>>>>>>> all of
>>>>>>>> them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive toxic
>>>>>>>> masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>>>>>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>> to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
>>>>>>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>>>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boy am I glad that I have that feminist in my killfile.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If men were as feminine as they want us all to be, they would have
>>>>>> become Islamic sex slaves in much like the women living in the
>>>>>> coastal
>>>>>> areas of Europe where the Moslems attacked most frequently. In
>>>>>> reality,
>>>>>> women must be feminine and men must be masculine. If people like her
>>>>>> can't take it, they are free not to marry and never to have any
>>>>>> kind of
>>>>>> sexual relations.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about saying they and others are free to live their lives as they
>>>>> wish as long as they are not hurting others. Why not back equal
>>>>> rights.
>>>>
>>>> Because then he'd lose some of his male privilege.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We see this repeatedly in history: when blacks were no longer
>>> enslaved (or at least not as easily and legally), when they were able
>>> to vote, when they could drink from the same water fountains and sit
>>> in the same seats, when women could vote, when women gained greater
>>> levels of equality in the workplace and in ownership rights, when
>>> Christians were no longer allowed to push their religion onto others
>>> as easily -- and now when gays are granted equality in the right to
>>> marry and Muslims are seeking equal rights, we see those who have
>>> grown used to their privileged position push back and claim to be
>>> victims.
>>>
>>> In the long run those demanding these special entitlements tend to
>>> lose. It takes a generation or so.
>>>
>>> The bigger concern to me is the growing income inequality. We are not
>>> too far from the time when the 1% will own 99% of the wealth and the
>>> 99% merely 1% of it. Our oligarchy -- and the spread of it around the
>>> globe -- is of a bigger concern to me. Not sure how that will play
>>> out. Wealth is power -- and when 1% has 99% of the power (or even
>>> close, as we are now) things are not good and violence is more likely.
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
> No.
>
> Marxists like Snit have no clue.
The fact you think I am a "Marxist" is an example of you being clueless.
> They are all about totalitarian forcing
> of equality (usually by killing lots of people) when in fact that few
> people have nearly all the money (or few people do most of the work) is
> a law of nature.
Those with the mass of the money are NOT doing the mass of the work.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0iL0ixoZYo
This is about Marxism and is not relevant to anything in the US.
> Pareto distribution.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361a0a31cba4ba4e994cbd@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #705175 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <poohr3$mhp$77@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:52:25 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
> > On 9/29/18 7:23 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:34:12 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>>> a feminization of men in general,
> >>>>
> >>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
> >>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything
> >>>> nice")
> >>>> as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten all of
> >>>> them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive toxic
> >>>> masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
> >>>>
> >>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
> >>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right
> >>>>> to vote, SO BE IT.
> >>>>
> >>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
> >>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
> >>>> feminization, stat.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
> >>> playing cops and robbers?
> >>
> >> Boy am I glad that I have that feminist in my killfile.
> >>
> >> If men were as feminine as they want us all to be, they would have
> >> become Islamic sex slaves in much like the women living in the coastal
> >> areas of Europe where the Moslems attacked most frequently. In reality,
> >> women must be feminine and men must be masculine. If people like her
> >> can't take it, they are free not to marry and never to have any kind of
> >> sexual relations.
> >
> > How about saying they and others are free to live their lives as they
> > wish as long as they are not hurting others. Why not back equal rights.
>
> Because then he'd lose some of his male privilege.
It comes with owning a penis.
--
Checkmate ÂŪ
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller
Copyright ÂĐ 2018
all rights reserved
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
"There are many here among us,
who feel that life is but a joke."
"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as
kensi." -Nadegda
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <eMUrD.33026$MJ2.4328@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #705168 |
On 9/29/2018 11:52 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/29/18 7:23 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:34:12 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>
>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified all
>>>> the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything nice")
>>>> as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten all of
>>>> them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive toxic
>>>> masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>
>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and use
>>>> the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>
>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>
>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to
>>>>> vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>
>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and not
>>>> the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>
>> Boy am I glad that I have that feminist in my killfile.
>>
>> If men were as feminine as they want us all to be, they would have become
>> Islamic sex slaves in much like the women living in the coastal areas of
>> Europe where the Moslems attacked most frequently. In reality, women must
>> be feminine and men must be masculine. If people like her can't take it,
>> they are free not to marry and never to have any kind of sexual
>> relations.
>>
>
> How about saying they and others are free to live their lives as they
> wish as long as they are not hurting others. Why not back equal rights.
>
Because somebody has to be the pepperoni on my pizza.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <g1atk3Fq63jU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #705213 |
On 9/29/18 5:27 PM, Lunar Opticfibre wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 11:52 AM, Snit wrote:
>> On 9/29/18 7:23 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:34:12 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>
>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified all
>>>>> the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything
>>>>> nice")
>>>>> as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten all of
>>>>> them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive toxic
>>>>> masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>
>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>>>> use
>>>>> the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>> right to
>>>>>> vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and not
>>>>> the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>
>>> Boy am I glad that I have that feminist in my killfile.
>>>
>>> If men were as feminine as they want us all to be, they would have
>>> become
>>> Islamic sex slaves in much like the women living in the coastal areas of
>>> Europe where the Moslems attacked most frequently. In reality, women
>>> must
>>> be feminine and men must be masculine. If people like her can't take it,
>>> they are free not to marry and never to have any kind of sexual
>>> relations.
>>>
>>
>> How about saying they and others are free to live their lives as they
>> wish as long as they are not hurting others. Why not back equal rights.
>>
>
> Because somebody has to be the pepperoni on my pizza.
LOL!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <pooa3c$i6c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #705127 |
On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>
>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified all
>> the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything
>> nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten
>> all of them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive
>> toxic masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>
>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>
>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>
>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to
>>> vote, SO BE IT.
>>
>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and not
>> the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>> feminization, stat.
>
> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
> playing cops and robbers?
Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that bizarre
post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <pop5lg$bbi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705154 |
On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>
>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything
>>> nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten
>>> all of them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive
>>> toxic masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>
>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>
>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>
>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to
>>>> vote, SO BE IT.
>>>
>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>> feminization, stat.
>>
>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>> playing cops and robbers?
>
> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that bizarre
> post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
>
Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little kids
that are just playing around, or thinking out loud, exploring, ect...
The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad' had to do with the
feminization of men. This is a bad practice. Heck, no wonder why you got
so mad and resorted to a ridiculous insinuation.
Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you typed in
the original name of this thread:
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind, right?
Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <pop887$mhp$86@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705217 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>
>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
>>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything
>>>> nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten
>>>> all of them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive
>>>> toxic masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>
>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>
>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>
>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right
>>>>> to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>
>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
>>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>
>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>
>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that bizarre
>> post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
>
> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little kids
> that are just playing around, or thinking out loud, exploring, ect...
> The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad' had to do with the
> feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a bad
practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry" type of toxic
masculinity is a bad practice.
> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
> insinuation.
I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you typed in
> the original name of this thread:
>
> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it, you'd
know it's the title of an article authored by someone other than kensi.
> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind, right?
> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
In a pig's eye!
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <popeng$jhd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705222 |
On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>
>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
>>>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and everything
>>>>> nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many cases even beaten
>>>>> all of them out of young boys, until they're left with aggressive
>>>>> toxic masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>
>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right
>>>>>> to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
>>>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>>
>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>
>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that bizarre
>>> post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
>>
>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little kids
>> that are just playing around, or thinking out loud, exploring, ect...
>> The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad' had to do with the
>> feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>
> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a bad
> practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry" type of toxic
> masculinity is a bad practice.
Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of it.
Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's cube that
can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers, or dodgeball,
into something bad. I can quote something:
"Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in a
sense. Sorry for the projection.
>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>> insinuation.
>
> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a little
drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation", or attack if
you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous part.
A insults B.
B responds as R.
A says R sounds to mean.
The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you typed in
>> the original name of this thread:
>>
>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>
> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it, you'd
> know it's the title of an article authored by someone other than kensi.
I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor. What a
horrific title.
>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind, right?
>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>
> In a pig's eye!
>
See? There you go again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <popfob$mhp$94@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705246 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
>>>>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and
>>>>>> everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many
>>>>>> cases even beaten all of them out of young boys, until they're left
>>>>>> with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog
>>>>>> tails").
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>>>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>>> right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
>>>>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>>
>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>>>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that bizarre
>>>> post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
>>>
>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little kids
>>> that are just playing around, or thinking out loud, exploring, ect...
>>> The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad' had to do with the
>>> feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>
>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a bad
>> practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry" type of
>> toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>
> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of it.
> Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's cube that
> can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers, or dodgeball,
> into something bad. I can quote something:
>
> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>
> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in a
> sense. Sorry for the projection.
>
>
>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>> insinuation.
>>
>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>
> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a little
> drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation", or attack if
> you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous part.
>
> A insults B.
>
> B responds as R.
>
> A says R sounds to mean.
>
> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>
>
>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you typed
>>> in the original name of this thread:
>>>
>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>
>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it, you'd
>> know it's the title of an article authored by someone other than kensi.
>
> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor. What a
> horrific title.
>
>
>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind, right?
>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>
>> In a pig's eye!
>
> See? There you go again.
But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
> A insults B.
>
> B responds as R.
>
> A says R sounds to mean.
>
> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
... the fuck?
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <popgbj$psb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705253 |
On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have classified
>>>>>>> all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice and
>>>>>>> everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in many
>>>>>>> cases even beaten all of them out of young boys, until they're left
>>>>>>> with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips and snails and puppy-dog
>>>>>>> tails").
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express and
>>>>>>> use the full range of emotions, including things like compassion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>>>> right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate and
>>>>>>> not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion of
>>>>>>> feminization, stat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>>>>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that bizarre
>>>>> post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little kids
>>>> that are just playing around, or thinking out loud, exploring, ect...
>>>> The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad' had to do with the
>>>> feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>
>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a bad
>>> practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry" type of
>>> toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>
>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of it.
>> Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's cube that
>> can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers, or dodgeball,
>> into something bad. I can quote something:
>>
>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>
>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in a
>> sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>
>>
>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>> insinuation.
>>>
>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>
>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a little
>> drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation", or attack if
>> you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous part.
>>
>> A insults B.
>>
>> B responds as R.
>>
>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>
>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>
>>
>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you typed
>>>> in the original name of this thread:
>>>>
>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>
>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it, you'd
>>> know it's the title of an article authored by someone other than kensi.
>>
>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor. What a
>> horrific title.
>>
>>
>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind, right?
>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>
>>> In a pig's eye!
>>
>> See? There you go again.
>
> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
The method below is a well known technique.
>
>> A insults B.
>>
>> B responds as R.
>>
>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>
>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>
> ... the fuck?
>
There you go again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <popgmp$mhp$101@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705260 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice
>>>>>>>> and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in
>>>>>>>> many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys, until
>>>>>>>> they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips and snails
>>>>>>>> and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express
>>>>>>>> and use the full range of emotions, including things like
>>>>>>>> compassion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>>>>> right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate
>>>>>>>> and not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion
>>>>>>>> of feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>>>>>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that
>>>>>> bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little
>>>>> kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud, exploring,
>>>>> ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad' had to do
>>>>> with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>>
>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a
>>>> bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry" type
>>>> of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>>
>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of it.
>>> Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's cube that
>>> can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers, or dodgeball,
>>> into something bad. I can quote something:
>>>
>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>>
>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in a
>>> sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>>> insinuation.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>>
>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation", or
>>> attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous part.
>>>
>>> A insults B.
>>>
>>> B responds as R.
>>>
>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>
>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you typed
>>>>> in the original name of this thread:
>>>>>
>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>>
>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
>>>> than kensi.
>>>
>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor. What
>>> a horrific title.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
>>>>> right?
>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>>
>>>> In a pig's eye!
>>>
>>> See? There you go again.
>>
>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
>
> The method below is a well known technique.
>
>
>>> A insults B.
>>>
>>> B responds as R.
>>>
>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>
>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>
>> ... the fuck?
>
> There you go again.
My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person (and
indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at all as a
result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
... or you are not normal.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <popm2i$cuh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705262 |
On 9/29/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
>>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and spice
>>>>>>>>> and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated, and in
>>>>>>>>> many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys, until
>>>>>>>>> they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips and snails
>>>>>>>>> and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express
>>>>>>>>> and use the full range of emotions, including things like
>>>>>>>>> compassion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>>>>>> right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate
>>>>>>>>> and not the other, would be for you to receive a massive infusion
>>>>>>>>> of feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to enjoy
>>>>>>>> playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>>>>>>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that
>>>>>>> bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York State?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little
>>>>>> kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud, exploring,
>>>>>> ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad' had to do
>>>>>> with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>>>
>>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a
>>>>> bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry" type
>>>>> of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>>>
>>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of it.
>>>> Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's cube that
>>>> can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers, or dodgeball,
>>>> into something bad. I can quote something:
>>>>
>>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in a
>>>> sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>>>> insinuation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>>>
>>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
>>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation", or
>>>> attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous part.
>>>>
>>>> A insults B.
>>>>
>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>
>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>
>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you typed
>>>>>> in the original name of this thread:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>>>
>>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
>>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
>>>>> than kensi.
>>>>
>>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor. What
>>>> a horrific title.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
>>>>>> right?
>>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>>>
>>>>> In a pig's eye!
>>>>
>>>> See? There you go again.
>>>
>>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
>>
>> The method below is a well known technique.
>>
>>
>>>> A insults B.
>>>>
>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>
>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>
>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>
>>> ... the fuck?
>>
>> There you go again.
>
> My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person (and
> indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at all as a
> result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
>
> ... or you are not normal.
>
> <snicker>
>
I can say the same about the way you are communicating.
;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <popn6o$mhp$102@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705273 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:13:53 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
>>>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and
>>>>>>>>>> spice and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated,
>>>>>>>>>> and in many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys,
>>>>>>>>>> until they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips
>>>>>>>>>> and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express
>>>>>>>>>> and use the full range of emotions, including things like
>>>>>>>>>> compassion.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>>>>>>> right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate
>>>>>>>>>> and not the other, would be for you to receive a massive
>>>>>>>>>> infusion of feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to
>>>>>>>>> enjoy playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>>>>>>>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that
>>>>>>>> bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York
>>>>>>>> State?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little
>>>>>>> kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud,
>>>>>>> exploring, ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad'
>>>>>>> had to do with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a
>>>>>> bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry"
>>>>>> type of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of it.
>>>>> Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's cube
>>>>> that can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers, or
>>>>> dodgeball, into something bad. I can quote something:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in a
>>>>> sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>>>>> insinuation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
>>>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation", or
>>>>> attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous
>>>>> part.
>>>>>
>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>
>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>
>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>
>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you
>>>>>>> typed in the original name of this thread:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
>>>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
>>>>>> than kensi.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor.
>>>>> What a horrific title.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a pig's eye!
>>>>>
>>>>> See? There you go again.
>>>>
>>>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
>>>
>>> The method below is a well known technique.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>
>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>
>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>
>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>
>>>> ... the fuck?
>>>
>>> There you go again.
>>
>> My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person (and
>> indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at all as a
>> result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
>>
>> ... or you are not normal.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
> I can say the same about the way you are communicating.
>
> ;^)
You could, but then you'd be lying.
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <por9df$mc2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705274 |
On 9/29/2018 10:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:13:53 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> On 9/29/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>> melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
>>>>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and
>>>>>>>>>>> spice and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated,
>>>>>>>>>>> and in many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys,
>>>>>>>>>>> until they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips
>>>>>>>>>>> and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to express
>>>>>>>>>>> and use the full range of emotions, including things like
>>>>>>>>>>> compassion.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's
>>>>>>>>>>>> right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of doctorate
>>>>>>>>>>> and not the other, would be for you to receive a massive
>>>>>>>>>>> infusion of feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to
>>>>>>>>>> enjoy playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested, or
>>>>>>>>> inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made that
>>>>>>>>> bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New York
>>>>>>>>> State?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on little
>>>>>>>> kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud,
>>>>>>>> exploring, ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being 'bad'
>>>>>>>> had to do with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>>>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not a
>>>>>>> bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry"
>>>>>>> type of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of it.
>>>>>> Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's cube
>>>>>> that can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers, or
>>>>>> dodgeball, into something bad. I can quote something:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in a
>>>>>> sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>>>>>> insinuation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
>>>>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation", or
>>>>>> attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous
>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you
>>>>>>>> typed in the original name of this thread:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
>>>>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
>>>>>>> than kensi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor.
>>>>>> What a horrific title.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In a pig's eye!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See? There you go again.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
>>>>
>>>> The method below is a well known technique.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>
>>>>> ... the fuck?
>>>>
>>>> There you go again.
>>>
>>> My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person (and
>>> indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at all as a
>>> result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
>>>
>>> ... or you are not normal.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>> I can say the same about the way you are communicating.
>>
>> ;^)
>
> You could, but then you'd be lying.
>
I can call you a liar as well. See? We are going around in a circle. It
is pointless... ;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <porb2e$mhp$112@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705354 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:50:05 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 10:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:13:53 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/29/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M.
>>>>>>>> Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
>>>>>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and
>>>>>>>>>>>> spice and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and in many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys,
>>>>>>>>>>>> until they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips
>>>>>>>>>>>> and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to
>>>>>>>>>>>> express and use the full range of emotions, including things
>>>>>>>>>>>> like compassion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>> doctorate and not the other, would be for you to receive a
>>>>>>>>>>>> massive infusion of feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to
>>>>>>>>>>> enjoy playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested,
>>>>>>>>>> or inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made
>>>>>>>>>> that bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New
>>>>>>>>>> York State?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on
>>>>>>>>> little kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud,
>>>>>>>>> exploring, ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being
>>>>>>>>> 'bad'
>>>>>>>>> had to do with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>>>>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not
>>>>>>>> a bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry"
>>>>>>>> type of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of
>>>>>>> it. Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's
>>>>>>> cube that can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers,
>>>>>>> or dodgeball, into something bad. I can quote something:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in
>>>>>>> a sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>>>>>>> insinuation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
>>>>>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation",
>>>>>>> or attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous
>>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you
>>>>>>>>> typed in the original name of this thread:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
>>>>>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
>>>>>>>> than kensi.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor.
>>>>>>> What a horrific title.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In a pig's eye!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See? There you go again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
>>>>>
>>>>> The method below is a well known technique.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... the fuck?
>>>>>
>>>>> There you go again.
>>>>
>>>> My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person
>>>> (and indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at
>>>> all as a result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
>>>>
>>>> ... or you are not normal.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>> I can say the same about the way you are communicating.
>>>
>>> ;^)
>>
>> You could, but then you'd be lying.
>
> I can call you a liar as well.
You could, but then you'd be lying.
--
FNVWe Nadegda
"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361ad07359c7e5fd994ce4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #705365 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <porb2e$mhp$112@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
>
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:50:05 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
> > On 9/29/2018 10:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:13:53 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/29/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>> melt!
> >>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>>>> melt!
> >>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M.
> >>>>>>>> Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
> >>>>>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> spice and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and in many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> until they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and snails and puppy-dog tails").
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> express and use the full range of emotions, including things
> >>>>>>>>>>>> like compassion.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> doctorate and not the other, would be for you to receive a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> massive infusion of feminization, stat.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to
> >>>>>>>>>>> enjoy playing cops and robbers?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested,
> >>>>>>>>>> or inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made
> >>>>>>>>>> that bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New
> >>>>>>>>>> York State?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on
> >>>>>>>>> little kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud,
> >>>>>>>>> exploring, ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being
> >>>>>>>>> 'bad'
> >>>>>>>>> had to do with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
> >>>>>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not
> >>>>>>>> a bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry"
> >>>>>>>> type of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of
> >>>>>>> it. Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's
> >>>>>>> cube that can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers,
> >>>>>>> or dodgeball, into something bad. I can quote something:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in
> >>>>>>> a sense. Sorry for the projection.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
> >>>>>>>>> insinuation.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
> >>>>>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation",
> >>>>>>> or attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous
> >>>>>>> part.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A insults B.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> B responds as R.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you
> >>>>>>>>> typed in the original name of this thread:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
> >>>>>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
> >>>>>>>> than kensi.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor.
> >>>>>>> What a horrific title.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
> >>>>>>>>> right?
> >>>>>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In a pig's eye!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> See? There you go again.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The method below is a well known technique.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> A insults B.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> B responds as R.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ... the fuck?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There you go again.
> >>>>
> >>>> My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person
> >>>> (and indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at
> >>>> all as a result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
> >>>>
> >>>> ... or you are not normal.
> >>>>
> >>>> <snicker>
> >>>>
> >>> I can say the same about the way you are communicating.
> >>>
> >>> ;^)
> >>
> >> You could, but then you'd be lying.
> >
> > I can call you a liar as well.
>
> You could, but then you'd be lying.
Let's ask the Asswurm... he'd know.
--
Checkmate ÂŪ
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller
Copyright ÂĐ 2018
all rights reserved
In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
"There are many here among us,
who feel that life is but a joke."
"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as
kensi." -Nadegda
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <bko1p2.gdc.17.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #705367 |
On 2018-09-30 1:22 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate! In article <porb2e$mhp$112@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
>
>
>>
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:50:05 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/29/2018 10:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:13:53 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/29/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M.
>>>>>>>>>> Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spice and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> express and use the full range of emotions, including things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like compassion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doctorate and not the other, would be for you to receive a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> massive infusion of feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enjoy playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested,
>>>>>>>>>>>> or inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made
>>>>>>>>>>>> that bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New
>>>>>>>>>>>> York State?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on
>>>>>>>>>>> little kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud,
>>>>>>>>>>> exploring, ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being
>>>>>>>>>>> 'bad'
>>>>>>>>>>> had to do with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>>>>>>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not
>>>>>>>>>> a bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry"
>>>>>>>>>> type of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of
>>>>>>>>> it. Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's
>>>>>>>>> cube that can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers,
>>>>>>>>> or dodgeball, into something bad. I can quote something:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in
>>>>>>>>> a sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>>>>>>>>> insinuation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
>>>>>>>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation",
>>>>>>>>> or attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous
>>>>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you
>>>>>>>>>>> typed in the original name of this thread:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
>>>>>>>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
>>>>>>>>>> than kensi.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor.
>>>>>>>>> What a horrific title.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In a pig's eye!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See? There you go again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The method below is a well known technique.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... the fuck?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There you go again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person
>>>>>> (and indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at
>>>>>> all as a result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... or you are not normal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I can say the same about the way you are communicating.
>>>>>
>>>>> ;^)
>>>>
>>>> You could, but then you'd be lying.
>>>
>>> I can call you a liar as well.
>>
>> You could, but then you'd be lying.
>
> Let's ask the Asswurm... he'd know.
>
don't ask me i won't believe you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <pouhgs$69d$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705365 |
On 9/30/2018 1:18 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:50:05 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> On 9/29/2018 10:33 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:13:53 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/29/2018 8:42 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:36:18 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 8:26 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:08:29 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 6:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 17:33:49 -0700, Chris M.
>>>>>>>>> Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 9:43 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/2018 1:34 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/28/2018 9:40 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/27/2018 5:47 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a feminization of men in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You say that like it's a bad thing. But you people have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> classified all the good and pleasant qualities ("sugar and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> spice and everything nice") as feminine and shamed, berated,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in many cases even beaten all of them out of young boys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> until they're left with aggressive toxic masculinity ("snips
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and snails and puppy-dog tails").
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now women are the only well-rounded people, able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> express and use the full range of emotions, including things
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like compassion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Men these days could use some feminization. A lot of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are evil. My prescription, if I had that kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doctorate and not the other, would be for you to receive a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> massive infusion of feminization, stat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider drugging some little kids that happen to
>>>>>>>>>>>> enjoy playing cops and robbers?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Would you consider letting me know what you imbibed, ingested,
>>>>>>>>>>> or inhaled at that party last night shortly before you made
>>>>>>>>>>> that bizarre post at 1:34 AM, and whether it is legal in New
>>>>>>>>>>> York State?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sometimes I think that the "doctors" want to push drugs on
>>>>>>>>>> little kids that are just playing around, or thinking out loud,
>>>>>>>>>> exploring, ect... The reference to "cops and robbers" being
>>>>>>>>>> 'bad'
>>>>>>>>>> had to do with the feminization of men. This is a bad practice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The feminization of men here means raising boys to actually have
>>>>>>>>> compassion and emotions other than anger and sullenness. It's not
>>>>>>>>> a bad practice. Raising boys to believe in a "real men don't cry"
>>>>>>>>> type of toxic masculinity is a bad practice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having compassion is fine, and men most certainly have a lot of
>>>>>>>> it. Fwiw, I have heard things from a certain side of the rubik's
>>>>>>>> cube that can seemingly turn simple games like cops and robbers,
>>>>>>>> or dodgeball, into something bad. I can quote something:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Overall, males are just to rough and aggressive..."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not sure if Kensi thinks this way, but it seems like she might, in
>>>>>>>> a sense. Sorry for the projection.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Heck, no wonder why you got so mad and resorted to a ridiculous
>>>>>>>>>> insinuation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't think anything kensi insinuated was ridiculous.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> She accused me of being intoxicated. So, you are probably just a
>>>>>>>> little drunkish right now: right? See? That "veiled accusation",
>>>>>>>> or attack if you will, in the form of a question is the ridiculous
>>>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Btw, what the hell were you shooting into your system when you
>>>>>>>>>> typed in the original name of this thread:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you'd bothered to examine the OP and click on the link in it,
>>>>>>>>> you'd know it's the title of an article authored by someone other
>>>>>>>>> than kensi.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know. Was just wondering why she referenced it with such rigor.
>>>>>>>> What a horrific title.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let me guess... This is generated from your totally sober mind,
>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>> Fwiw, mine was in a sober state as well. :^)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In a pig's eye!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See? There you go again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I have evidence! To wit, this bit of wackiness from you:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The method below is a well known technique.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A insults B.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> B responds as R.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A says R sounds to mean.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The act of A insulting B was a setup for the following "script"..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... the fuck?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There you go again.
>>>>>
>>>>> My point is, you are not communicating like a normal, sober person
>>>>> (and indeed, whatever you're trying to say is not being received at
>>>>> all as a result). Therefore either you are not sober ...
>>>>>
>>>>> ... or you are not normal.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>> I can say the same about the way you are communicating.
>>>>
>>>> ;^)
>>>
>>> You could, but then you'd be lying.
>>
>> I can call you a liar as well.
>
> You could, but then you'd be lying.
>
I hope so. ;^) See? The circle of insults. This can start to be boiled
down into a hamsters wheel. On and on...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700 |
| Subject | We need to eat more. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.27--9.38am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #704864 |
> > I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. > > I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p > She says `you are best daddy in the world` ;) I could have 10 people telling me the same thing; but I avoid it, for obvious reasons. > > The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected > > in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, > > At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually > and be replaced with nation that has more then that. We need to eat more too, or we'll starve to death.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web