Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #703635 > unrolled thread

Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Last post2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 1000+ — 45 participants
Thread has 1097 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view

Thread has 1097 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.


Contents

  Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
              Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
                                              Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
                                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
                                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
                                                          Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
                                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
                                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
                                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
                                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
                      I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
                                            Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
                                              Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-29 15:43 -0700
                                                Double-A, Nov 2008. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 17:06 -0700
                                                  Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:34 -0400
                                                  Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
                                                Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:54 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
                                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
                                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
                                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
                                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
                                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
                                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
                          We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
                              "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
                                  Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
                                        If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
                                          Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
                                          Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
                                              Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
                                          Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
                                            Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
                                              Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
                                                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
                                        I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
                                              If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
                                                        Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
                                                          Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
                                                            Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
                                                              Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
                                                                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
                                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
                                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
                                                  The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
                                                    Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
                                                        Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
                                                              Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
                                                                    Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
                                                                      I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
                                                                        Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                        Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
                                                                          Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
                                                                              Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
                                                                                    Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
                                                                                    Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
                                                                          Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
                                                                                          I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
                                                                                              Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
                                                                                                  Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
                                                                                                        Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
                                                                                                                Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
                                                                          Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
                                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
                                                                      Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
                                                                        Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
                                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
                                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
                                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
                                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
                                                                                    Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
                                                                                                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
                                                                                            The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
                                                                                Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
                                                                                        Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
                                                                            Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
                                                                              Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
                                                                              Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
                                                                                Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
                                                                                Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
                                                                          If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                            Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
                                                                              If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
                                                                                  Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
                                                                                    Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
                                                                                        Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
                                                                                Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
                                                                                    China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
                                                                                      Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
                                                                Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
                                                                  Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
                                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
                                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
                                  More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
                              Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
                        The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
                          Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
                            "IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
                                Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
                                  Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
                                    Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
                            Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
                              Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
                      The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
                Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
                  Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
          No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
        Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
          Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
            It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
              Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
                A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
                  Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:15 -0700
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
        The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
          Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
            You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
                Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
                  Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
                    Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
                      Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
                        The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                          2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
                              What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
                                Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
                                  Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
                                    I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
                                      Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
                                        Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
                                          Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
                                        The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
                                          Re: The LessBad option. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-24 15:34 -0700
                                          Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
                                            "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
                                                I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
                                                    Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
                                                      Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
                                                        I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
                                                          Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
                                                    You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
                                                      Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
                                                        Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
                                                          Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
                                                          Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
                                                          The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
                                                              Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
                                                                Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
                                                                  Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
                                                              Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
                                                                              Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
                                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
                                                                      Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
                                                                        Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
                                                                          Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
                                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
                                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
                                                "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
                                                    Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
                                                              Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                                Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:33 -0700
                                                              An IQ of 185. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 06:41 -0700
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
                                                          Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700

Page 49 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 47 48 [49] 50  Next page →


#704817 — Re: I walk everywhere.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
SubjectRe: I walk everywhere.
Message-ID<MPG.361601685989c840994c68@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#704760
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bkdhpr.2et.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


> 
> On 2018-09-26 2:00 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:26:11 -0400, benj wrote:
> > 
> >> On 9/26/2018 11:45 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>> On 9/26/2018 8:41 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>> There is no reason for a janitor to be making as much as someone who
> >>>> was forced to get a degree to do his work.
> >>>
> >>> There's also no reason for a janitor to be making less than the cost of
> >>> bare-bones living, k0ok.
> >>
> >> Depends what the value of your work is. You Commies PRETEND that even a
> >> person who does nothing at all is owed a living, but truth is that once
> >> you gain power you simply murder them (and a few more as well). Pure
> >> Evil.
> > 
> > Please to be pointing to kensi's police record then, kooky. If she's a
> > murderer there has to be an arrest on record for it, surely.
> > 
> not if she got a pardon

What if she got a hardon?

-- 
Checkmate ยฎ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ยฉ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704910 — Re: I walk everywhere.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
SubjectRe: I walk everywhere.
Message-ID<bkfv7b.99n.17.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#704817
On 2018-09-26 9:50 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bkdhpr.2et.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On 2018-09-26 2:00 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:26:11 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/26/2018 11:45 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 9/26/2018 8:41 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>> There is no reason for a janitor to be making as much as someone who
>>>>>> was forced to get a degree to do his work.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's also no reason for a janitor to be making less than the cost of
>>>>> bare-bones living, k0ok.
>>>>
>>>> Depends what the value of your work is. You Commies PRETEND that even a
>>>> person who does nothing at all is owed a living, but truth is that once
>>>> you gain power you simply murder them (and a few more as well). Pure
>>>> Evil.
>>>
>>> Please to be pointing to kensi's police record then, kooky. If she's a
>>> murderer there has to be an arrest on record for it, surely.
>>>
>> not if she got a pardon
> 
> What if she got a hardon?
> 
then she'd be like you when you follow me

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704993 — Re: I walk everywhere.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
SubjectRe: I walk everywhere.
Message-ID<MPG.3617599b6039e34994c86@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#704910
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bkfv7b.99n.17.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


> 
> On 2018-09-26 9:50 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <bkdhpr.2et.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> > says...
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> On 2018-09-26 2:00 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:26:11 -0400, benj wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 9/26/2018 11:45 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>>> On 9/26/2018 8:41 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>>>> There is no reason for a janitor to be making as much as someone who
> >>>>>> was forced to get a degree to do his work.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There's also no reason for a janitor to be making less than the cost of
> >>>>> bare-bones living, k0ok.
> >>>>
> >>>> Depends what the value of your work is. You Commies PRETEND that even a
> >>>> person who does nothing at all is owed a living, but truth is that once
> >>>> you gain power you simply murder them (and a few more as well). Pure
> >>>> Evil.
> >>>
> >>> Please to be pointing to kensi's police record then, kooky. If she's a
> >>> murderer there has to be an arrest on record for it, surely.
> >>>
> >> not if she got a pardon
> > 
> > What if she got a hardon?
> > 
> then she'd be like you when you follow me

Is that why you always try to brake-check me?

-- 
Checkmate ยฎ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ยฉ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704787 — Re: I walk everywhere.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
SubjectRe: I walk everywhere.
Message-ID<g12ireF4elbU10@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#704747
On 9/26/18 1:26 PM, benj wrote:
> On 9/26/2018 11:45 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 9/26/2018 8:41 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> There is no reason for a janitor to be making as much as someone who was
>>> forced to get a degree to do his work.
>>
>> There's also no reason for a janitor to be making less than the cost 
>> of bare-bones living, k0ok.
> 
> Depends what the value of your work is. You Commies PRETEND that even a 
> person who does nothing at all is owed a living, but truth is that once 
> you gain power you simply murder them (and a few more as well). Pure Evil.

Who are you saying is doing what? What commies?

>>> Despite the fact that he won't admit it, Snit is a Marxist and believes
>>> that everyone should get the same salary because everyone contributes
>>> equally, even a barista.
>>>
>>> That's why most of us don't reply to him though. Regardless of 
>>> whether we
>>> are on the left or the right, we all find the Prescott Parasite to be
>>> intolerable.
>>
>> Speak for yourself, koOk.
>>
> No parasite is intolerable to any Neo-Marxist, SilverSlimer.

If you do not like parasites then many of the very wealthy must really 
bother you.

But you will not say that. Ever.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704790 — Re: I walk everywhere.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
SubjectRe: I walk everywhere.
Message-ID<g12ivvF4elbU13@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#704649
On 9/26/18 5:41 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:45:31 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 9/25/2018 7:59 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/25/18 2:41 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:50:46 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,ย  Esq. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:35:31 GMT, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>>>> Speaking of me, someone wrote:
>>>>>>>> you probably want to eliminate driver's licensing and vehicle
>>>>>>>> registration too...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I walk everywhere.
>>>>>>> I'd be happy if most cars were removed from the road.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because you can't afford one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my case, I believe that cities should be planned in such a way
>>>>>> that they cater to drivers rather than bicycles or pedestrians,
>>>>>> especially those up north like those in Canada. . .
>>>>>
>>>>> Fuck Canada, it's a socialist country - everything will become more
>>>>> and more dysfunctional.
>>>>
>>>> A lot of the country is socialist in that we have free public health
>>>> care and such but the conservatives seem to be gaining power in every
>>>> area. I think most people are fed up of leftist politics especially
>>>> since it left Ontario with a deficit of $15 billion. The left is
>>>> always making sure that it spends a lot but never wonders how they'll
>>>> ever pay it back.
>>>
>>> In the US the economy does better under Democrats than it does under
>>> Republicans. And it is very unlikely Canada will give up its universal
>>> health care system -- why be so stupid as to do so? Does not mean it
>>> will not change over time.
>>>
>>>>>>  ย  . . . Every morning I wish there were more
>>>>>> bridges to get onto the island of Montreal considering how clogged
>>>>>> they get but political parties don't give a shit about the traffic;
>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not it.ย  Socialism is anti-individual.ย  Socialism would rather
>>>>> a citizen not drive automobiles. They want you to suffer and complain
>>>>> - all the better for them because they can more easily force you into
>>>>> public transportation like cattle in a cattle car. It's all about
>>>>> their being in control.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. I still intend to drive a car because it represents total
>>>> freedom.
>>>
>>> Not wanting people to harm each other and backing equal rights is NOT
>>> about "control".
>>
>> What you idiot post-modernists try to hide is that you back "equality of
>> outcome" rather than equal opportunity. The problem with that idea is
>> that equality of outcome can only be enforced by totalitarian control
>> which is really what you are about.
> 
> There is no reason for a janitor to be making as much as someone who was
> forced to get a degree to do his work. Despite the fact that he won't
> admit it, Snit is a Marxist and believes that everyone should get the
> same salary because everyone contributes equally, even a barista.
> 
> That's why most of us don't reply to him though. Regardless of whether we
> are on the left or the right, we all find the Prescott Parasite to be
> intolerable.
> 
>>>>>> . . .they want to appease the hippy crowd which believes that
>>>>>> everyone can get to their destination - even 40km away in the dead
>>>>>> of winter - on a bike.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not it either. They couldn't care less about the hippy crowd.
>>>>> Socialists have a vision of communist China where bicycles flood the
>>>>> roads. Nobody can afford automobiles and if they could the roads
>>>>> would be gridlocked and useless.
>>>>>
>>>>> Get a clue - get out of Socialist Canada.
>>>>
>>>> I'd go to Poland if I could but my wife isn't Polish... it seems to be
>>>> a conservative paradise over there.
>>>
>>> So immigrate.
>>
>> Maybe you should immigrate to your dream Nordic Utopia. Maybe a little
>> Islamic crime and violence will change your mind. Then again probably
>> not. You'd just lie about it.
> 
> Snit would most likely allow himself to get raped, wouldn't report the
> crime and if the barbarians were to rape/murder his wife and children, he
> would protest against them being deported. You'd think I'm kidding but
> this kind of stuff already happens. The leftist mental illness is potent.
> 
See how you lie because you know you cannot refute my ideas. I back 
equal rights over your push for special entitlements. It pisses you off. 
Oh well.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704550 — Re: I walk everywhere.

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
SubjectRe: I walk everywhere.
Message-ID<podspb$16t4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704500
On 9/25/2018 10:16 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Speaking of me, someone wrote:
>> you probably want to eliminate driver's licensing
>> and vehicle registration too...
> 
> I walk everywhere.
> I'd be happy if most cars were removed from the road.
> 
Rolf you idiot, not everyone walks around in a little plastic leftist is 
bubble like you left coasters do. It would take me an entire day just to 
walk to the nearest grocery store and back. Even when I used to live 
downtown and tried walking to the grocery store until they went out of 
business, it didn't work out so well. Think of how much longer your arms 
get walking home carrying a big watermelon that you forgot you'd have to 
carry home!

To walk everywhere today is to say you have exactly ZERO life. But then 
we all knew that already.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704567 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<poe6ch$mhp$45@dont-email.me>
In reply to#704483
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>> > 
>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%), etc.;
>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't mind,
>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>> 
>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny and
>> "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
> 
> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.

Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
existent sky pixie.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704569 — "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Subject"God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.25--1.51pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#704567
You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
> > "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
> 
> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". 
> Let alone from your non-existent sky pixie.

"God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704571 — Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.
Message-ID<bkasqk.sc7.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#704569
On 2018-09-25 1:51 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>
>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment".
>> Let alone from your non-existent sky pixie.
> 
> "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.
> 
how can anything that doesn't exist have a name ,
why would anyone give a name to something they disbelieve exists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704586 — Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
SubjectRe: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.
Message-ID<poebsa$4hk$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704569
On 9/25/2018 4:51 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>
>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment".
>> Let alone from your non-existent sky pixie.
> 
> "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie.
> 
Nads would shit if she ever saw a real pixie, and would doubtless die if 
she just looked at God. Nads has not a clue what the meaning of the 
phrase" the power of God is infinite" means. But then Nads has little 
clue about ANYTHING.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704573 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<9o9lqd9joovl8fps9uc60d3kmkjasd3f05@4ax.com>
In reply to#704567
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:38:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

<...>

>Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
>existent sky pixie.

Keep it up with your attitude and you just might
experience corporal punishment in the form of an
over-my-knee spanking which is just what you
deserve.  LOL.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with 
her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ยฎ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704574 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<bkaur0.u1d.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#704573
On 2018-09-25 2:23 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:38:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
>> existent sky pixie.
> 
> Keep it up with your attitude and you just might
> experience corporal punishment in the form of an
> over-my-knee spanking which is just what you
> deserve.  LOL.
> 
and greg fires off a gay of hope

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704588 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<poec4r$4hk$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#704573
On 9/25/2018 5:23 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:38:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
>> existent sky pixie.
> 
> Keep it up with your attitude and you just might
> experience corporal punishment in the form of an
> over-my-knee spanking which is just what you
> deserve.  LOL.
> 
Unfortunately is also just what she wants!
Born and bred in the briar patch!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704646 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<rftmqdhb41oi9bik5e73v2e22et2mbqv8p@4ax.com>
In reply to#704588
benj wrote:

>On 9/25/2018 5:23 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:38:41 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> <...>
>> 
>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
>>> existent sky pixie.
>> 
>> Keep it up with your attitude and you just might
>> experience corporal punishment in the form of an
>> over-my-knee spanking which is just what you
>> deserve.  LOL.
>> 
>Unfortunately is also just what she wants!

Not that there's anytyhing wrong, with that...

-- 
"I can only imagine what a nightmare it would be to go to high school
with a bunch of dumb, loudmouth blacks eeking and ooking all day
long."  -  DumFSck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704687 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<ehanqdllo9k1jliicr327b5sphjk1hg1jd@4ax.com>
In reply to#704646
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:06:22 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>benj wrote:
>>On 9/25/2018, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018, Nadegda wrote:
>>> 
>>> <...>
>>> 
>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
>>>> existent sky pixie.
>>> 
>>> Keep it up with your attitude and you just might
>>> experience corporal punishment in the form of an
>>> over-my-knee spanking which is just what you
>>> deserve.  LOL.
>>> 
>>Unfortunately is also just what she wants!
>
>Not that there's anytyhing wrong, with that...

Most women get wet just thinking about it. 

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with 
her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ยฎ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705187 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromJohn of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com>
Date2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<poos4f$tmr$16@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#704567
Nadegda wrote:

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>> > 
>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%), etc.;
>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't mind,
>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>> 
>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny and
>>> "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>> 
>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
> 
> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
> existent sky pixie.

ATHEIST!! You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence 
on you!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705196 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<MPG.3619a73bd3a0da68994cb1@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#705187
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <poos4f$tmr$16@news.mixmin.net>, jpatmos1318
@gmXil.com says...


> 
> Nadegda wrote:
> 
> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > 
> >> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
> >>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
> >>> > 
> >>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%), etc.;
> >>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't mind,
> >>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
> >>> 
> >>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny and
> >>> "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
> >> 
> >> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
> > 
> > Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
> > existent sky pixie.
> 
> ATHEIST!! You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence 
> on you!

Thank Dog you're back, John.  This place is infested with fucking 
sinners.  I don't know how much more of this shit I can take!

-- 
Checkmate ยฎ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ยฉ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705197 — Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.)

Fromsnit <usnet@iminsane.net>
Date2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
SubjectSteve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.)
Message-ID<e7gzosuir3vy$.kibnw0nobrfc.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#705196
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 16:14:36 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <poos4f$tmr$16@news.mixmin.net>, jpatmos1318
> @gmXil.com says...
> 
> 
>> 
>> Nadegda wrote:
>> 
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%), etc.;
>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't mind,
>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny and
>>>>> "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>> 
>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>> 
>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your non-
>>> existent sky pixie.
>> 
>> ATHEIST!! You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence 
>> on you!
> 
> Thank Dog you're back, John.  This place is infested with fucking 
> sinners.  I don't know how much more of this shit I can take!

Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is
single, broke and has no skills. He blames Peter the Klรถwn for his loss of
his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Peter the Klรถwn has and
in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over
10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is
an utter failure in life. 

Of his online life Steven says 

    I've been booted off by past providers before because people 
    complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP 
    *again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually 
    search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted 
    from. 
    
Some examples where Steven has been booted 

X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity 
http://tinyurl.com/z92qmz4 

Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity 
http://tinyurl.com/h75nh9l 

FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn 

AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service 
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman 

Imgur took down an image for breaking terms of service
http://imgur.com/yv2XppE 

Had a GigaNews account which was removed for harassing Peter the Klรถwn 

Stopped posting from his fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I
complained. Seems he lost that too. 

His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her 


    
Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that has ever been available 
http://web.archive.org/web/20161019062351/http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net/ 
https://goo.gl/DMno6J 

Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he
said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the
contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul 
http://web.archive.org/web/20161202192456/http://www.reservationdiary.eu/eng/reservation/d76d1156-e9f7-43c1-b77b-b07189857820 

He also bragged he was working on an update and showed it here
https://vid.me/u6RK 

The business still failed. 

He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get
WordPress installed. 

https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879 


This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Peter the Klรถwn. 


Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing
another woman. 

Peter the Klรถwn is married and by all appearances happily so. 
He never complains about his wife in COLA. 


Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room. 

Peter the Klรถwn does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has
a house and a yard. 


Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan
his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He
says at least one of them likely hacked his computer and is a "mentally
deficient child." He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone
who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself 

Peter the Klรถwn has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in
public. 
No reason to think they are not a happy family. 


Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of
dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has
given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date. 

Peter the Klรถwn has his own business doing technical work and also teaches. 
Peter the Klรถwn offers a true contribution to society. 
Teachers are truly under appreciated. 

-- 
My Snoring Solution 
https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq 
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo 
Jonas Eklundh 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705225 — Re: Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.)

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
SubjectRe: Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.)
Message-ID<pop8og$mhp$89@dont-email.me>
In reply to#705197
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:16:27 -0400, snit wrote:

> Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is
> single, broke and has no skills. He blames Peter the Klรถwn for his loss
> of his wife and girlfriend.

What really happened to them? They found out about each other?

<snicker>

> [rest of what looks like stalkerish behavior snecked]

Get a life, kook. And quit impersonating other usenetters!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#705230 — Re: Steve Petruzzellis

Fromsnit <usnet@iminsane.net>
Date2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
SubjectRe: Steve Petruzzellis
Message-ID<1r3oxo57mau8y$.1ribx762j9owu.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#705225
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:26:40 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:16:27 -0400, snit wrote:
> 
>> Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is
>> single, broke and has no skills. He blames Peter the Klรถwn for his loss
>> of his wife and girlfriend.
> 
> What really happened to them? They found out about each other?
> 
> <snicker>
> 
>> [rest of what looks like stalkerish behavior snecked]
> 
> Get a life, kook. And quit impersonating other usenetters!

Are you retarded?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 49 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 47 48 [49] 50  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web