Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #682824 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-28 20:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-01 15:17 -0400 |
| Articles | 15 on this page of 35 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-28 20:03 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 17:24 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 18:19 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-28 22:46 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-28 22:41 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 21:45 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-29 05:26 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-29 21:56 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-30 19:33 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-30 19:24 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-30 20:28 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 23:49 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:29 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-01 13:16 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-01 19:30 +0000
Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 20:08 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:34 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 12:41 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-01 17:49 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 19:48 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:30 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 08:51 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:39 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 13:23 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 12:39 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 18:02 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 05:20 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 08:46 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:28 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-02 08:53 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:44 -0400
Re: Babs Shrub... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-02 12:48 -0700
"kensi" never brings up Asia, she's not that educated. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-05 09:27 -0700
Re: Babs Shrub... benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:17 -0400
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 05:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcc0ff$16bf$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683259 |
On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's >> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of >> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the >> viewer's naked eye. > > I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 08:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9mcjed5h9vjnfc1uqde1tfq5ku97crctju@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683284 |
On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:30:20 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's >>> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of >>> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the >>> viewer's naked eye. >> >> I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi > >My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' >evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless >it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. Middle-weight stars? Bwahahahahhahah! This is more proof that you, kensi, are a FAKE astrophysicist. Why would I say that? Because stars are not classified that way. Stars are classified this way: http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/startype.html ... by type which consists of a letter and a number. For example: B3, F5, G2, M8, etc. <smackdown> -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 09:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6cjGC.65369$1e7.59879@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #683291 |
On 5/2/2018 8:51 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:30:20 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> >>>> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's >>>> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of >>>> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the >>>> viewer's naked eye. >>> >>> I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi >> >> My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' >> evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless >> it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. > > Middle-weight stars? Bwahahahahhahah! > > This is more proof that you, kensi, are a > FAKE astrophysicist. Why would I say that? > > Because stars are not classified that way. > Stars are classified this way: > > http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/startype.html > > ... by type which consists of a letter and a number. > > For example: B3, F5, G2, M8, etc. > > <smackdown> Isn't it totally hilarious Sir Greg, when Libs pretend to be scientists? They think they can fool everyone with their bullshit and golden voices. I've seen so many try this and they ALL flunked out of science majors. Um, oh, "Kanzi" actually meant F0, F5, anyone with any science training and a brain would know that Sir Greg. I"m sure "Kanzi" will tell you about it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 13:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <busjedh8p67vbsjst5nn5vei9bbse56kos@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683305 |
On Wed, 2 May 2018 09:39:14 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >On 5/2/2018 8:51 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:30:20 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>>> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's >>>>> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of >>>>> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the >>>>> viewer's naked eye. >>>> >>>> I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi >>> >>> My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' >>> evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless >>> it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. >> >> Middle-weight stars? Bwahahahahhahah! >> >> This is more proof that you, kensi, are a >> FAKE astrophysicist. Why would I say that? >> >> Because stars are not classified that way. >> Stars are classified this way: >> >> http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/startype.html >> >> ... by type which consists of a letter and a number. >> >> For example: B3, F5, G2, M8, etc. >> >> <smackdown> > >Isn't it totally hilarious Sir Greg, when Libs pretend to be scientists? >They think they can fool everyone with their bullshit and golden voices. >I've seen so many try this and they ALL flunked out of science majors. > >Um, oh, "Kanzi" actually meant F0, F5, anyone with any science training >and a brain would know that Sir Greg. I"m sure "Kanzi" will tell you >about it. Indeed! But, only after she has some time to Google up an authentic-sounding answer. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 12:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3553b3e4cc6568cb99388f@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #683291 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <9mcjed5h9vjnfc1uqde1tfq5ku97crctju@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:30:20 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > > >>> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's > >>> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of > >>> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the > >>> viewer's naked eye. > >> > >> I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi > > > >My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' > >evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless > >it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. > > Middle-weight stars? Bwahahahahhahah! > > This is more proof that you, kensi, are a > FAKE astrophysicist. Why would I say that? > > Because stars are not classified that way. > Stars are classified this way: > > http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/startype.html > > ... by type which consists of a letter and a number. > > For example: B3, F5, G2, M8, etc. > > <smackdown> She coulda been a conTENda... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 18:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <j8dked1pvd2a2tlhucb724puuigevft4bh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683377 |
On Wed, 2 May 2018 12:39, Checkmate wrote: > greghall says... >> On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:30, kensi wrote: >> >On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> > >> >>> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's >> >>> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of >> >>> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the >> >>> viewer's naked eye. >> >> >> >> I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi >> > >> >My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' >> >evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless >> >it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. >> >> Middle-weight stars? Bwahahahahhahah! >> >> This is more proof that you, kensi, are a >> FAKE astrophysicist. Why would I say that? >> >> Because stars are not classified that way. >> Stars are classified this way: >> >> http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/startype.html >> >> ... by type which consists of a letter and a number. >> >> For example: B3, F5, G2, M8, etc. >> >> <smackdown> > >She coulda been a conTENda... Pretty hard to be a contender when she's turned into a cricket. LOL!! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 05:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcek8v$1fge$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683291 |
On 5/2/2018 8:51 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:30:20 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> >>>> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's >>>> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of >>>> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the >>>> viewer's naked eye. >>> >>> I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi >> >> My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' >> evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless >> it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. > > Middle-weight stars? Yes, mostly G and F dwarfs, but also what these evolve into post-main-sequence. Stars born with from around 0.84 to around 5 solar masses (they slowly lose mass over time though). -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 08:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <irvledl23tkri89fgrv8ve8d9ehj9rqfne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683470 |
On Thu, 3 May 2018 05:20:27 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/2/2018 8:51 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:30:20 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 5/1/2018 10:48 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>>> The size of the solar system and the 9th planet's >>>>> projected orbit makes it appear about the size of >>>>> a BB viewed from about 26 miles away from the >>>>> viewer's naked eye. >>>> >>>> I know one person who WON'T find it, and that's Kensi >>> >>> My observational program right now is focused on middle-weight stars' >>> evolution, so yeah, it's not likely I'll stumble onto a planet unless >>> it's an exoplanet of one of those stars. >> >> Middle-weight stars? > >Yes, mostly G and F dwarfs, but also what these evolve into >post-main-sequence. Stars born with from around 0.84 to around 5 solar >masses (they slowly lose mass over time though). Took too long for you to Goggle it, IMO. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-03 08:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcf0bl$4pj$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683482 |
On 5/3/2018 8:24 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2018 05:20:27 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Yes, mostly G and F dwarfs, but also what these evolve into >> post-main-sequence. Stars born with from around 0.84 to around 5 solar >> masses (they slowly lose mass over time though). > > Too<SMACKAK00K!> What? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 05:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcc0ci$16bf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #683186 |
On 5/1/2018 3:41 PM, Checkmate wrote: > There's no shortage of Ko0ks on YouTube with their crazy-assed stories > about this menacing "Planet Nibiru". Funny, nobody can find it, when > we've got telescopes that can see millions of light years into space. The real Planet 9 is totally different from the old Nibiru hypothesis. The real Planet 9 is, and stays, far out in/beyond the Kuiper Belt. > I saw a very misleading "documentary" about it on The Science Channel, I > think. They talked about it throughout the whole program as if it was a > known fact that it exists, and then at the end, they started sneaking a > lot of "IF's" into the narrative. That's what passes for science these > days, especially on the educational cable channels that have been colonized by the anti-intellectual Rupert Murdoch conservative propaganda machine. Whenever that beast takes over an educational channel they gut the real serious documentary type content and flood its schedule with right-wing propaganda pap like the xenophobia-stoking and authoritarian "Border Security", with junk-food "documentaries" like Hoarders, Ice Road Truckers, and Storage Wars, and with pseudo-intellectual bullshit like Nibiru "documentaries" and "I'm not saying it was aliens, but..." stuff. All of it directed at the NASCAR fan demographic instead of actual educated and involved citizens, which Murdoch has taken as a collective enemy (along with, no doubt, blacks, Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, and all of the other usual scapegoats wherever fascists gain power -- except in Israel, of course, where the local homegrown version of fascism scapegoats blacks, Muslims, Palestinians, homosexuals, and the educated instead). -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 08:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <35djedh04qk521d28s4v702qm2eui1arnq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683283 |
On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:28:46 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: <...> >on the educational cable channels that have been colonized by the >anti-intellectual Rupert Murdoch conservative propaganda machine. >Whenever that beast takes over an educational channel they gut the real >serious documentary type content and flood its schedule with right-wing >propaganda pap like the xenophobia-stoking and authoritarian "Border >Security", with junk-food "documentaries" like Hoarders, Ice Road >Truckers, and Storage Wars, and with pseudo-intellectual bullshit like >Nibiru "documentaries" and "I'm not saying it was aliens, but..." stuff. >All of it directed at the NASCAR fan demographic instead of actual >educated and involved citizens, which Murdoch has taken as a collective >enemy (along with, no doubt, blacks, Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, and all >of the other usual scapegoats wherever fascists gain power -- except in >Israel, of course, where the local homegrown version of fascism >scapegoats blacks, Muslims, Palestinians, homosexuals, and the educated >instead). Kookspeak --- KOOK ALERT!!!! Run, run, run! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 09:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <NgjGC.33964$np1.18311@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #683294 |
On 5/2/2018 8:53 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018 05:28:46 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > >> on the educational cable channels that have been colonized by the >> anti-intellectual Rupert Murdoch conservative propaganda machine. >> Whenever that beast takes over an educational channel they gut the real >> serious documentary type content and flood its schedule with right-wing >> propaganda pap like the xenophobia-stoking and authoritarian "Border >> Security", with junk-food "documentaries" like Hoarders, Ice Road >> Truckers, and Storage Wars, and with pseudo-intellectual bullshit like >> Nibiru "documentaries" and "I'm not saying it was aliens, but..." stuff. >> All of it directed at the NASCAR fan demographic instead of actual >> educated and involved citizens, which Murdoch has taken as a collective >> enemy (along with, no doubt, blacks, Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, and all >> of the other usual scapegoats wherever fascists gain power -- except in >> Israel, of course, where the local homegrown version of fascism >> scapegoats blacks, Muslims, Palestinians, homosexuals, and the educated >> instead). > > > Kookspeak --- KOOK ALERT!!!! Run, run, run! > Doesn't that all sound a bit like the "socialist" policies of Pol Pot? Libs always say that others are doing what their own actions have been. I wonder how Pol Pot missed a towering intellectual like "Dr. Kanzi"? Surely her skull should sitting proudly on the top of the pile? But luckily killing intellectuals usually does mean no libs need worry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-02 12:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3553b5ea907f0e61993890@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #683283 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pcc0ci$16bf$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 5/1/2018 3:41 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > > There's no shortage of Ko0ks on YouTube with their crazy-assed stories > > about this menacing "Planet Nibiru". Funny, nobody can find it, when > > we've got telescopes that can see millions of light years into space. > > The real Planet 9 is totally different from the old Nibiru hypothesis. > The real Planet 9 is, and stays, far out in/beyond the Kuiper Belt. > > > I saw a very misleading "documentary" about it on The Science Channel, I > > think. They talked about it throughout the whole program as if it was a > > known fact that it exists, and then at the end, they started sneaking a > > lot of "IF's" into the narrative. That's what passes for science these > > days, especially > > on the educational cable channels that have been colonized by the > anti-intellectual Rupert Murdoch conservative propaganda machine. > Whenever that beast takes over an educational channel they gut the real > serious documentary type content and flood its schedule with right-wing > propaganda pap like the xenophobia-stoking and authoritarian "Border > Security", with junk-food "documentaries" like Hoarders, Ice Road > Truckers, and Storage Wars, and with pseudo-intellectual bullshit like > Nibiru "documentaries" and "I'm not saying it was aliens, but..." stuff. > All of it directed at the NASCAR fan demographic instead of actual > educated and involved citizens, which Murdoch has taken as a collective > enemy (along with, no doubt, blacks, Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, and all > of the other usual scapegoats wherever fascists gain power -- except in > Israel, of course, where the local homegrown version of fascism > scapegoats blacks, Muslims, Palestinians, homosexuals, and the educated > instead). I wouldn't characterize it as right-wing propaganda, but pablum for the NASCAR crowd works for me. I remember when The History Channel was one of my favorites. Now it's Pickers-Pawn Shop-Pickers-Pawn shop, etc. I even emailed them to complain about how far down the toilet their programming had gone, and ended up pissing off someone at the other end <bows>. I finally told her that her channel was going to hell, and I was going to go watch the show about the Alaskan inbred Bush People. She threatened to ban me from their online forums, and I had to point out that I don't even use their fucking online forums. Checkmate! -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-05 09:27 -0700 |
| Subject | "kensi" never brings up Asia, she's not that educated. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.5--9.27am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #683283 |
"kensi" wrote: > All of it directed at the NASCAR fan demographic instead of actual > educated and involved citizens, which Murdoch has taken as a collective > enemy ( along with, no doubt, blacks, Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, > and all of the other usual scapegoats wherever fascists gain power... This is rich, coming from the girl that worships BlueEyed Norway. She never brings up Asia, of course, because she's not that educated.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-01 15:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b33GC.68815$yc1.67062@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #683110 |
On 5/1/2018 5:29 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/1/2018 2:49 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> Kensi claims to be an astrophysicist but she >>> doesn't even know about the search for the >>> *9th* planet >> I think this mystery ninth planet is a load of Ko0k shit. > > Ah, we have a double SPNAK today. > > https://www.space.com/38431-new-evidence-planet-nine-existence.html > > Occam's razor says planet 9 is far more likely than five distinct and > separate alternative explanations for five solar-system peculiarities. > > SPNAK! on two k00ks at once. > > *snicker* > Einstein's razor says you are a dumbass journalist pretending to be a scientist. Hint: It's not working. Chortle. (Rule #5)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web