Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #684673 > unrolled thread

WINNERS - April 2018 Usenet Kook Awards

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  WINNERS - April 2018 Usenet Kook Awards Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-09 23:48 +0000
    Re: WINNERS - April 2018 Usenet Kook Awards % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:02 -0700
      Re: WINNERS - April 2018 Usenet Kook Awards Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-09 18:33 -0700
    Re: WINNERS - April 2018 Usenet Kook Awards benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 20:06 -0400
      Re: WINNERS - April 2018 Usenet Kook Awards % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:15 -0700
    Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-10 12:23 -0700
      Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:18 +0000
        You promote premises that are useful to your tiny tribe. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-10 14:27 -0700
        Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 14:27 -0700
          Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ? Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:20 -0600
        Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-10 20:32 -0400
          Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 17:53 -0700
          Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:21 +0000

#684673 — WINNERS - April 2018 Usenet Kook Awards

Kook of the Month

And the winner is: SKEETER!
[4] Skeeter
[0] None of the above

By unanimous vote, Skeeter is April's official Kook of the Month after 
weeks of doing a fake-FNVW schtick (and racking up monthly Tinfoil 
Sombreros), burbling inanities, frothing, and kooking out. My guess is 
that as the Trump regime falls apart, so does what passes for this 
wackjob's mind, and that he'll stroke out, Bobo, or get himself committed 
to an asylum on the very day Trump is finally impeached.

Looney Maroon

And the winner is: SKEETER!
[4] Skeeter
[0] None of the above

Missed predictions and hilariously wrong claims (often, though by no means 
exclusively, about the Trump regime) have been a Skeeter staple for a long 
time. Now Skeeter finally gets the recognition he so richly deserves.

Coward of the Month

And the winner is: BENJ!
[4] benj
[0] None of the above

There is no question this n00b climate-denier won't run from, no demand 
for MIDs or other evidence to substantiate his k'lames that he won't hide 
from.

George Pickett Memorial Trophy

And the winner is: SKEETER!
[4] Skeeter
[0] None of the above

Our Kook of the Month for April has been a busy little kook, not only 
burbling his way into a Looney Maroon and fakesterizing his way into KotM 
but homicidally-ideating his way into a Pickett's Charge as well.

This is the one to watch, folks. Radicalized by online hate sites to 
nearly the same degree as Alek Minassian, this extremist is about one 
major life setback away from making the evening news ... and that month's 
Bobo.

Lodestone Award

And the winner is: BENJ!
[4] benj
[0] None of the above

Irony and projection seem to be the primary talents of this climate-
denying kooktard from sci.physics, as demonstrated by his success at 
claiming this coveted award.

The trophy may have some traces of feline fecal matter still adhering to 
its inside. Fluffy was upset that no kooks submitted bogus ballots this 
month, so there was nothing to shred and use to line his litter tray. My 
apologies, benj. It doesn't smell ... much ... and a good spritzing with 
diluted bleach followed by a hearty scrub out to get it clean, crisp-
smelling, and as shiny as new.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#684678

.

this post has been vetoed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684688

x-no-archive: yes

On 5/9/2018 5:02 PM, % wrote:
> .
> 
> this post has been vetoed

Noted and recorded.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684679

On 5/9/2018 7:48 PM, Libtard wrote:
> Kook of the Month
> 
> And the winner is: SKEETER!
> [4] Skeeter
> [0] None of the above
> 
> By unanimous vote, Skeeter is April's official Kook of the Month after
> weeks of doing a fake-FNVW schtick (and racking up monthly Tinfoil
> Sombreros), burbling inanities, frothing, and kooking out. My guess is
> that as the Trump regime falls apart, so does what passes for this
> wackjob's mind, and that he'll stroke out, Bobo, or get himself committed
> to an asylum on the very day Trump is finally impeached.
> 
> Looney Maroon
> 
> And the winner is: SKEETER!
> [4] Skeeter
> [0] None of the above
> 
> Missed predictions and hilariously wrong claims (often, though by no means
> exclusively, about the Trump regime) have been a Skeeter staple for a long
> time. Now Skeeter finally gets the recognition he so richly deserves.
> 
> Coward of the Month
> 
> And the winner is: BENJ!
> [4] benj
> [0] None of the above
> 
> There is no question this n00b climate-denier won't run from, no demand
> for MIDs or other evidence to substantiate his k'lames that he won't hide
> from.
> 
> George Pickett Memorial Trophy
> 
> And the winner is: SKEETER!
> [4] Skeeter
> [0] None of the above
> 
> Our Kook of the Month for April has been a busy little kook, not only
> burbling his way into a Looney Maroon and fakesterizing his way into KotM
> but homicidally-ideating his way into a Pickett's Charge as well.
> 
> This is the one to watch, folks. Radicalized by online hate sites to
> nearly the same degree as Alek Minassian, this extremist is about one
> major life setback away from making the evening news ... and that month's
> Bobo.
> 
> Lodestone Award
> 
> And the winner is: BENJ!
> [4] benj
> [0] None of the above
> 
> Irony and projection seem to be the primary talents of this climate-
> denying kooktard from sci.physics, as demonstrated by his success at
> claiming this coveted award.
> 
> The trophy may have some traces of feline fecal matter still adhering to
> its inside. Fluffy was upset that no kooks submitted bogus ballots this
> month, so there was nothing to shred and use to line his litter tray. My
> apologies, benj. It doesn't smell ... much ... and a good spritzing with
> diluted bleach followed by a hearty scrub out to get it clean, crisp-
> smelling, and as shiny as new.
> 
Hey I used to have a cat. Cat was kool Used to deposit big steaming pile 
in front of the litter box and not in it. I tried and tried to train her 
otherwise but like Kensi and Nads, her feline head was as hard as stone. 
And then it hit me! *I* was the stupid one! Instead of having to sift 
though the litter box for turds every week, my feckless feline simple 
deposited them on the papers in front of the box for me to simply wrap 
and toss. I hate it when a cat is smarter and more lazy than you are, 
but nevertheless I can say with some authority that I am experienced 
with feline feces!

I love a win, but I fear that this so-called "contest" is as fake as the
Lib Oscars. Cripes, I didn't even break a sweat generating pure kook and 
yet won. Sad, sad state of affairs. At least HVAC used to bring up 
ghosts and UFOs. Around here nobody has the least imagination. Such is 
modern America.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684681

On 2018-05-09 5:06 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/9/2018 7:48 PM, Libtard wrote:
>> Kook of the Month
>>
>> And the winner is: SKEETER!
>> [4] Skeeter
>> [0] None of the above
>>
>> By unanimous vote, Skeeter is April's official Kook of the Month after
>> weeks of doing a fake-FNVW schtick (and racking up monthly Tinfoil
>> Sombreros), burbling inanities, frothing, and kooking out. My guess is
>> that as the Trump regime falls apart, so does what passes for this
>> wackjob's mind, and that he'll stroke out, Bobo, or get himself committed
>> to an asylum on the very day Trump is finally impeached.
>>
>> Looney Maroon
>>
>> And the winner is: SKEETER!
>> [4] Skeeter
>> [0] None of the above
>>
>> Missed predictions and hilariously wrong claims (often, though by no 
>> means
>> exclusively, about the Trump regime) have been a Skeeter staple for a 
>> long
>> time. Now Skeeter finally gets the recognition he so richly deserves.
>>
>> Coward of the Month
>>
>> And the winner is: BENJ!
>> [4] benj
>> [0] None of the above
>>
>> There is no question this n00b climate-denier won't run from, no demand
>> for MIDs or other evidence to substantiate his k'lames that he won't hide
>> from.
>>
>> George Pickett Memorial Trophy
>>
>> And the winner is: SKEETER!
>> [4] Skeeter
>> [0] None of the above
>>
>> Our Kook of the Month for April has been a busy little kook, not only
>> burbling his way into a Looney Maroon and fakesterizing his way into KotM
>> but homicidally-ideating his way into a Pickett's Charge as well.
>>
>> This is the one to watch, folks. Radicalized by online hate sites to
>> nearly the same degree as Alek Minassian, this extremist is about one
>> major life setback away from making the evening news ... and that month's
>> Bobo.
>>
>> Lodestone Award
>>
>> And the winner is: BENJ!
>> [4] benj
>> [0] None of the above
>>
>> Irony and projection seem to be the primary talents of this climate-
>> denying kooktard from sci.physics, as demonstrated by his success at
>> claiming this coveted award.
>>
>> The trophy may have some traces of feline fecal matter still adhering to
>> its inside. Fluffy was upset that no kooks submitted bogus ballots this
>> month, so there was nothing to shred and use to line his litter tray. My
>> apologies, benj. It doesn't smell ... much ... and a good spritzing with
>> diluted bleach followed by a hearty scrub out to get it clean, crisp-
>> smelling, and as shiny as new.
>>
> Hey I used to have a cat. Cat was kool Used to deposit big steaming pile 
> in front of the litter box and not in it. I tried and tried to train her 
> otherwise but like Kensi and Nads, her feline head was as hard as stone. 
> And then it hit me! *I* was the stupid one! Instead of having to sift 
> though the litter box for turds every week, my feckless feline simple 
> deposited them on the papers in front of the box for me to simply wrap 
> and toss. I hate it when a cat is smarter and more lazy than you are, 
> but nevertheless I can say with some authority that I am experienced 
> with feline feces!
> 
> I love a win, but I fear that this so-called "contest" is as fake as the
> Lib Oscars. Cripes, I didn't even break a sweat generating pure kook and 
> yet won. Sad, sad state of affairs. At least HVAC used to bring up 
> ghosts and UFOs. Around here nobody has the least imagination. Such is 
> modern America.
> 
> 
stay away from the awards until you get your usenet legs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684796 — Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

You (SovietTard) wrote:
> [4] Skeeter
> [4] benj

Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684802 — Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 10 May 2018 12:23:52 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> You (SovietTard) wrote:
>> [4] Skeeter
>> [4] benj
> 
> Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

Why couldn't he invent more what?

I think you may be misunderstanding the tabulating process. The [4] 
besides Skeeter's name means that four people voted for him for Kook of 
the Month. It doesn't mean Skeeter or Libtard did anything four times.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684815 — You promote premises that are useful to your tiny tribe.

> > You (SovietTard) wrote:
> > > [4] Skeeter
> > > [4] benj
> > 
> > Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?
> 
> four people voted

You promote premises that are useful to your tiny tribe;
compared to this, truthiness simply doesn't matter. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684816 — Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pd29ek$aep$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 12:23:52 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> > You (SovietTard) wrote:
> >> [4] Skeeter
> >> [4] benj
> > 
> > Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?
> 
> Why couldn't he invent more what?
> 
> I think you may be misunderstanding the tabulating process. The [4] 
> besides Skeeter's name means that four people voted for him for Kook of 
> the Month. It doesn't mean Skeeter or Libtard did anything four times.

Did you try to run another "ballot" over in The Ko0k Krater?  I must have 
missed it.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684832 — Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

On Thu, 10 May 2018 14:27:55 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <pd29ek$aep$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>@gmail.invalid says...
>
>
>> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Thu, 10 May 2018 12:23:52 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> 
>> > You (SovietTard) wrote:
>> >> [4] Skeeter
>> >> [4] benj
>> > 
>> > Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?
>> 
>> Why couldn't he invent more what?
>> 
>> I think you may be misunderstanding the tabulating process. The [4] 
>> besides Skeeter's name means that four people voted for him for Kook of 
>> the Month. It doesn't mean Skeeter or Libtard did anything four times.
>
>Did you try to run another "ballot" over in The Ko0k Krater?  I must have 
>missed it.


Libtard socky tried but iit got shut down quick, Nads is just butthurt
because it got impeached from the job.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684848 — Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

On 5/10/2018 4:18 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 10 May 2018 12:23:52 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
>> You (SovietTard) wrote:
>>> [4] Skeeter
>>> [4] benj
>>
>> Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?
> 
> Why couldn't he invent more what?
> 
> I think you may be misunderstanding the tabulating process. The [4]
> besides Skeeter's name means that four people voted for him for Kook of
> the Month. It doesn't mean Skeeter or Libtard did anything four times.
> 
FOUR VOTES!!!

Well Shit! That is sure a meaningless award. Christ, just Derbyshire 
Ontario socks ALONE could generate more votes than that! This obviously 
counts as a fail. I'm turning in my ko0k kard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684851 — Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

On 2018-05-10 5:32 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/10/2018 4:18 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Thu, 10 May 2018 12:23:52 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>
>>> You (SovietTard) wrote:
>>>> [4] Skeeter
>>>> [4] benj
>>>
>>> Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?
>>
>> Why couldn't he invent more what?
>>
>> I think you may be misunderstanding the tabulating process. The [4]
>> besides Skeeter's name means that four people voted for him for Kook of
>> the Month. It doesn't mean Skeeter or Libtard did anything four times.
>>
> FOUR VOTES!!!
> 
> Well Shit! That is sure a meaningless award. Christ, just Derbyshire 
> Ontario socks ALONE could generate more votes than that! This obviously 
> counts as a fail. I'm turning in my ko0k kard.
> 
doesn't matter its all been vetoed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684864 — Re: Why just 4, couldn't you invent more ?

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 10 May 2018 20:32:06 -0400, benj wrote:

> Derbyshire

I'm not saying you and Sergio are someone's matching socks, but it sure is 
"interesting" that you both started worshipping the God of the Kooks at 
the same exact time as each other ...

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web