Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #611294 > unrolled thread

#define came from God himself, it's sacred.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  #define came from God himself, it's sacred. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-01 23:51 -0800
    #define came from God himself, it's sacred. Jeff-Relf.Me <@..yep> - 2017-01-02 08:00 +0000
      Re: #define came from God himself, it's sacred. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-03 03:58 +0000
        I completely reWrote it, of course. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 00:46 -0800
          I completely reWrote it, of course. Jeff-Relf.Me <@..sour> - 2017-01-03 08:51 +0000
            Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-01-05 16:12 -0800
          Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-03 12:13 +0100
            Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2017-01-03 12:28 +0100
            Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-03 07:32 -0600
              Ezekiel lives in your head RENT FREE!!  LOL!!! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-03 12:16 -0700
              With "warnings as errors", turn off these warnings. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 13:00 -0800
            Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-03 12:16 -0700
              Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid> - 2017-01-03 12:30 -0800
                If you're retarded then, yes, _Loop() is "undefined". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:06 -0800
              Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-01-04 13:33 +0000
                Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 07:45 -0600
                  Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-01-04 14:54 +0000
                    The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-04 10:17 -0800
                      Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-04 19:19 +0100
                        Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 16:33 -0800
                          Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 16:23 -0800
                      Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-05 03:34 +0000
                        The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-04 22:26 -0800
                          Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.tld> - 2017-01-05 08:18 +0000
                            Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-05 09:24 +0100
                            PostScript is my thing. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-05 01:08 -0800
                          My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-07 03:56 -0800
                            Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-07 13:09 +0100
                            Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-07 20:25 +0000
                              Like a compiler that compiles itself, my Diff app diffs itself. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-07 17:53 -0800
                              Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2017-01-10 22:15 +0100
                                Text file comparison is essential. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:23 -0800
                                  Re: Text file comparison is essential. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 11:22 -0800
                                  Nothing to compare, left and right, old and new. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:12 -0800
                      Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-01-05 14:08 +0000
                      Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-05 21:09 +0000
                        Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2017-01-05 21:19 +0000
                          "Functional" programming is "Tree Crawling". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-05 14:53 -0800
                      Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 17:43 -0600
                    Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-01-05 14:08 +0000
              What about you, GreyCloud ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:02 -0800
                Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-16 19:46 -0700
                  Health issues ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 20:39 -0800
                    Re: Health issues ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-17 11:50 -0700
                      Re: Health issues ? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 14:19 -0800
                        Re: Health issues ? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 18:44 -0800
                      Negative Interest Rates. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:25 -0800
                        Re: Negative Interest Rates. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-19 11:47 -0700
                          Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 19:23 -0800
                            Re: Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-20 16:17 -0700
                Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:02 -0800
                Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:17 -0800
                  Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-19 13:59 +0100
                    No one is here to learn at your feet, sorry. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 05:30 -0800
                    Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-19 07:37 -0600
                      Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 05:43 -0800
                        Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 10:06 -0800
                    Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-20 04:32 +0000
                      Usenet isn't WikiPedia; here, it's all play and no work, anything goes. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 21:02 -0800
                        yeah, you can always prefer your preferred header noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 21:22 -0800
          The "Least Longest" diffs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 03:04 -0800

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#613389 — What about you, GreyCloud ?

Speaking of my code, you ( GreyCloud ) wrote:
> He doesn't work for anybody needing code.  
> That much is certain. Otherwise, he'd have been fired.

I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
What about you ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613516 — Re: What about you, GreyCloud ?

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

> Speaking of my code, you ( GreyCloud ) wrote:
>> He doesn't work for anybody needing code.
>> That much is certain. Otherwise, he'd have been fired.
> 
> I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
> for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
> What about you ?

Retired.  And all of my cruise missiles work fine.

So, you work for the slave masters known as bankers, eh?

-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613525 — Health issues ?

You ( GreyCloud ) replied ( to me ):
> > I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
> > for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
> > What about you ?
> 
> Retired.  And all of my cruise missiles work fine.

I doubt it, sounds like you've been put out to pasture.
Likely, you have health issues.

> So, you work for the slave masters known as bankers, eh?

Yes, but it's _worse than that.
We're robots, programmed by Nature to play "The Stay Alive Game";
including: Breathing, Pissing, Shitting, Breeding, etc.

Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613602 — Re: Health issues ?

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

> You ( GreyCloud ) replied ( to me ):
>> > I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
>> > for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
>> > What about you ?
>> 
>> Retired.  And all of my cruise missiles work fine.
> 
> I doubt it, sounds like you've been put out to pasture.
> Likely, you have health issues.

Nope, I was very expensive and the gov. offered me a retirement package I 
couldn't refuse.

> 
>> So, you work for the slave masters known as bankers, eh?
> 
> Yes, but it's _worse than that.
> We're robots, programmed by Nature to play "The Stay Alive Game";
> including: Breathing, Pissing, Shitting, Breeding, etc.
> 
> Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck.

Everyone in the world would be better off if Trump kicked the private bankers 
out of this country and go back to the original Bank of Congress... no interest 
on loans, the way it used to be.

-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613656 — Re: Health issues ?

like, LarouchiacS

> Nope, I was very expensive and the gov. offered me a retirement package I 
> couldn't refuse.
> 
> > 
> >> So, you work for the slave masters known as bankers, eh?
> > 
> > Yes, but it's _worse than that.
> > We're robots, programmed by Nature to play "The Stay Alive Game";
> > including: Breathing, Pissing, Shitting, Breeding, etc.
> > 
> > Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck.
> 
> Everyone in the world would be better off if Trump kicked the private bankers 
> out of this country and go back to the original Bank of Congress... no interest 
> on loans, the way it used to be.
> 
> -- 
> My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#613735 — Re: Health issues ?

333, three middle fingers

> > My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614057 — Negative Interest Rates.

You ( GreyCloud ) replied ( to me ):
> > Sounds like you've been put out to pasture.
> > Likely, you have health issues.
> 
> Nope, I was very expensive and the gov. offered me 
> a retirement package I couldn't refuse.

I'm not "too expensive".

> Everyone in the world would be better off if Trump kicked the private bankers 
> out of this country and go back to the original Bank of Congress... 
> no interest on loans, the way it used to be.

Google "negative interest rates":
https://www.google.com/search?q=negative+interest+rates

It's real thing, but only in _highly developed countries.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614117 — Re: Negative Interest Rates.

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

> You ( GreyCloud ) replied ( to me ):
>> > Sounds like you've been put out to pasture.
>> > Likely, you have health issues.
>> 
>> Nope, I was very expensive and the gov. offered me
>> a retirement package I couldn't refuse.
> 
> I'm not "too expensive".

Then that is what your company deems you are worth then.

> 
>> Everyone in the world would be better off if Trump kicked the private bankers
>> out of this country and go back to the original Bank of Congress...
>> no interest on loans, the way it used to be.
> 
> Google "negative interest rates":
> https://www.google.com/search?q=negative+interest+rates
> 
> It's real thing, but only in _highly developed countries.

In other words, the bankers are ripping people off.
It won't be long till they collapse.

-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614226 — Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor.

What is GreyCloud complaining about ? !
And why is he proud of being "too expensive" for his former employers ?
I think he's gotten into the peyote.

Negative Interest Rates "rip off" rich people, not the poor.
"Greedy Bankers" had _nothing to do with it.

We see it _only in the _richest countries; to wit:
Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden, and Japan.

Google "guaranteed minimum income":
https://www.google.com/search?q=guaranteed+minimum+income

Pick your Least Worst option, and hope for the Least Worst outcome.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614411 — Re: Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor.

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

> What is GreyCloud complaining about ? !

You don't know your U.S. history very well.
Get rid of the Federal Reserve and kick out the foreign bankers.
Go back to Gold and Silver that resists inflation and also is debt free.
No interest rates at all.
Right now, you are a debt slave.

> And why is he proud of being "too expensive" for his former employers ?
> I think he's gotten into the peyote.
> 
> Negative Interest Rates "rip off" rich people, not the poor.
> "Greedy Bankers" had _nothing to do with it.
> 
> We see it _only in the _richest countries; to wit:
> Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden, and Japan.
> 
> Google "guaranteed minimum income":
> https://www.google.com/search?q=guaranteed+minimum+income
> 
> Pick your Least Worst option, and hope for the Least Worst outcome.

-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614053 — Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object.

You ( MrDFS ) replied ( to me ):
> > I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
> > for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
> > What about you ?
> 
> That just means no other programmers above you have read the code.

_Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object,
at great expense, including bankers and professors, lots of them,
and some Visual Studio guys, at MicroSoft.

I've enjoyed 24 years of that, no less.

> You know - and everyone else knows - your coding style 
> (not necessarily the performance or functionality) is substandard.  
> 
> I consider it a violation of professional ethics for you 
> to deliver code formatted the way you do.

I write _serious code, unmaintainable code,
the kind that does _serious work, no joking around.

WhiteSpace and silly comments are for comic strips
and tinker toys, not real work.

Running the code, testing it,
is how one knows what's up, not whitespace and (borked) comments.

If whitespace and (borked) comments is what you need/like,
then add them yourself, later... _I don't want to see that crap.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614056 — Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny.

Speaking of "easy to maintain" (joke) code, you ( DFS ) replied:
> > Part of the gig, at least, nowadays, is not leaving a mess for the next guy.
> 
> That's right.  So when you're playing guitar on stage and get drunk and 
> puke, you clean it up for the main act.  You've been there...

Getting drunk and horny on stage is not, _not like coding.

Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614059 — Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny.

On 19/01/17 13:17, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
<rant>

Look, could people /please/ stop cross-posting this nonsense back and
forth between newsgroups?

If Jeff wants to write line-noise and force a C++ compiler to accept it,
that's his business.  It is not unreasonable to have a /single/ thread
in comp.lang.c++ about it where real C++ developers can tell him his
mistakes and try to teach him how to write better code.

But what we in c.l.c++ /don't/ want is this jumble of different threads,
half cross-posted to wildly different groups, full of irrelevances,
topic-jumps, and missing half the posts because some people try to set
newsgroup follow-ups, some people change groups, and some people switch
back to cross-posting.

Anyone from comp.os.linux.advocacy or sci.physics is welcome here in
comp.lang.c++ if you want to talk about C++.  But /please/ learn to use
Usenet properly first!  I cannot imagine any topic that would make sense
to cross-post between all these groups.

</rant>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614064 — No one is here to learn at your feet, sorry.

No one is here to learn at your feet, David Brown.
Here, it's all play and no work, uncensored.

I suggest you drop all posts from me, 
Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy, and  Sci.Physics .

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614066 — Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny.

David Brown wrote:

>But what we in c.l.c++ /don't/ want is this jumble of different threads,
>half cross-posted to wildly different groups, full of irrelevances,
>topic-jumps,

All part of the Relf troll's plan, man.  I plonk people simply for
responding to his garbage.  I don't want to see it.

-- 
"He disabled 17 MS compiler warnings out of ~3000.  Not that I would
do it, but it's not the end of the world."  -  "DFS"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614067 — Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny.

MrChrisV quotes MrDFS ( speaking of me ):
> " He disabled 17 MS compiler warnings out of ~3000.  
>   Not that I would do it, but it's not the end of the world."

Yes, and here's why, in detail:
  http://Jeff-Relf.Me/C++CodingRules.HTM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614104 — Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny.

your headers are quite linear

> Yes, and here's why, in detail:
>   http://Jeff-Relf.Me/C++CodingRules.HTM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614234 — Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny.

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:

>On 19/01/17 13:17, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
><rant>

>Look, could people /please/ stop cross-posting this nonsense back and
>forth between newsgroups?

>If Jeff wants to write line-noise and force a C++ compiler to accept it,
>that's his business.  It is not unreasonable to have a /single/ thread
>in comp.lang.c++ about it where real C++ developers can tell him his
>mistakes and try to teach him how to write better code.

>But what we in c.l.c++ /don't/ want is this jumble of different threads,
>half cross-posted to wildly different groups, full of irrelevances,
>topic-jumps, and missing half the posts because some people try to set
>newsgroup follow-ups, some people change groups, and some people switch
>back to cross-posting.

Mostly Relf's fault. He never did learn the purpose of the Newsgroups:
header, plus he changes the Subject: every time which breaks threading
in a few newsreaders.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614240 — Usenet isn't WikiPedia; here, it's all play and no work, anything goes.

Usenet isn't WikiPedia; here, it's all play and no work, anything goes.

The _Default "Subject:" line is neither mandatory or desirable.

Quoting 
" rfc1036: Standard for Interchange of USENET Messages "
https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1036/rfc1036.html#z4
＜＜

  The "Subject" line ( formerly "Title" ) 
  tells what the message is about.

  It __Should be suggestive enough of the contents of the message
  to enable a reader to make a decision whether to read 
  the message BASED ON THE SUBJECT ALONE. 

  If the message is submitted in response to another message 
  ( e.g., is a follow-up ) the _Default subject should 
  begin with the four characters "Re:", and the 
  "References" line is required.  ＞＞

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614243 — yeah, you can always prefer your preferred header

I have also expunged the word, okay,
from my typing, although it is hard to break
in speaking, because it is the abrev., o.k

>   If the message is submitted in response to another message 
>   ( e.g., is a follow-up ) the _Default subject should 
>   begin with the four characters "Re:", and the 
>   "References" line is required.  ＞＞

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web