Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #390364

Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object.

From	Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, comp.lang.c++
Subject	Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object.
Date	2017-01-19 04:02 -0800
Organization	Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com
Message-ID	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.19--4.02A.Seattle.2017> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.3--0.46A.Seattle.2017> <o4g0ub$nmq$1@dont-email.me> <o4gt6q$t5b$12@dont-email.me> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.16--11.02A.Seattle.2017> <o5j5hq$29h$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

You ( MrDFS ) replied ( to me ):
> > I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
> > for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
> > What about you ?
> 
> That just means no other programmers above you have read the code.

_Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object,
at great expense, including bankers and professors, lots of them,
and some Visual Studio guys, at MicroSoft.

I've enjoyed 24 years of that, no less.

> You know - and everyone else knows - your coding style 
> (not necessarily the performance or functionality) is substandard.  
> 
> I consider it a violation of professional ethics for you 
> to deliver code formatted the way you do.

I write _serious code, unmaintainable code,
the kind that does _serious work, no joking around.

WhiteSpace and silly comments are for comic strips
and tinker toys, not real work.

Running the code, testing it,
is how one knows what's up, not whitespace and (borked) comments.

If whitespace and (borked) comments is what you need/like,
then add them yourself, later... _I don't want to see that crap.

Thread

#define came from God himself, it's sacred. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-01 23:51 -0800
  #define came from God himself, it's sacred. Jeff-Relf.Me <@..yep> - 2017-01-02 08:00 +0000
    Re: #define came from God himself, it's sacred. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-03 03:58 +0000
      I completely reWrote it, of course. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 00:46 -0800
        I completely reWrote it, of course. Jeff-Relf.Me <@..sour> - 2017-01-03 08:51 +0000
          Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 15:49 -0800
        Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-03 12:13 +0100
          Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2017-01-03 12:28 +0100
          Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-03 07:32 -0600
            Ezekiel lives in your head RENT FREE!!  LOL!!! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-03 12:16 -0700
            With "warnings as errors", turn off these warnings. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 13:00 -0800
          Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-03 12:16 -0700
            Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid> - 2017-01-03 12:30 -0800
              If you're retarded then, yes, _Loop() is "undefined". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:06 -0800
            Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-01-04 13:33 +0000
              Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 07:45 -0600
                Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-01-04 14:54 +0000
                The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-04 10:17 -0800
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-04 19:19 +0100
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-05 09:00 -0600
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-01-05 11:16 -0500
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-05 03:34 +0000
                The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-04 22:26 -0800
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.tld> - 2017-01-05 08:18 +0000
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-05 09:24 +0100
                PostScript is my thing. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-05 01:08 -0800
                My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-07 03:56 -0800
                Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-07 13:09 +0100
                Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-07 20:25 +0000
                Like a compiler that compiles itself, my Diff app diffs itself. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-07 17:53 -0800
                Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2017-01-10 22:15 +0100
                Text file comparison is essential. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:23 -0800
                Re: Text file comparison is essential. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-01-16 14:16 -0500
                Nothing to compare, left and right, old and new. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:12 -0800
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-01-04 23:32 -0500
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-01-05 14:08 +0000
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2017-01-05 09:13 -0800
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-05 21:09 +0000
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2017-01-05 21:19 +0000
                "Functional" programming is "Tree Crawling". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-05 14:53 -0800
                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 17:43 -0600
                Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-01-05 14:08 +0000
            What about you, GreyCloud ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:02 -0800
              Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-01-16 14:06 -0500
                Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 11:13 -0800
                Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-01-16 14:17 -0500
                Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 11:37 -0800
                Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:17 -0800
                Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-19 13:59 +0100
                No one is here to learn at your feet, sorry. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 05:30 -0800
                Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-19 07:37 -0600
                Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 05:43 -0800
                Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-20 04:32 +0000
                Usenet isn't WikiPedia; here, it's all play and no work, anything goes. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 21:02 -0800
                Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-16 19:47 -0700
                What about you, GreyCloud ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:20 -0800
                Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:02 -0800
              Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-16 19:46 -0700
                Health issues ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 20:39 -0800
                Re: Health issues ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-17 11:50 -0700
                Negative Interest Rates. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:25 -0800
                Re: Negative Interest Rates. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-19 11:47 -0700
                Re: Negative Interest Rates. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 17:51 -0800
                Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 19:23 -0800
                Re: Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-20 16:17 -0700
                Re: Negative Interest Rates. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-20 16:15 -0700
        The "Least Longest" diffs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 03:04 -0800

csiph-web