Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #598424 > unrolled thread

Re: Today's Presidential Debate.

Started bySnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
First post2016-09-26 22:09 -0700
Last post2016-09-28 07:50 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 137 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 22:09 -0700
    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-27 09:01 -0700
      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-27 12:08 -0500
      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:17 -0700
        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 12:13 -0600
          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:23 -0700
            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 15:07 -0600
              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 14:13 -0700
                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:51 -0600
                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:16 +0200
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:28 -0600
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 09:49 +0200
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 08:04 -0500
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 15:42 +0200
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:16 -0600
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:14 -0600
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:28 -0700
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 07:02 -0500
                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:17 -0700
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:30 -0600
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:07 -0700
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:22 -0600
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:52 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:15 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 11:13 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:11 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:45 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:40 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:21 -0700
                                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:45 -0600
                                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:55 +0000
                                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:08 -0700
                                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
                                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:23 -0700
                                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:35 -0600
                                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:38 -0700
                                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:05 +0200
                                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 17:04 -0700
                                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:04 -0700
                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:55 -0400
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:32 -0600
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:22 -0400
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:23 -0600
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:35 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:21 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:48 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:46 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:24 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:17 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:55 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:26 -0700
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
                                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:22 -0700
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:12 -0400
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:24 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:24 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:49 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:47 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:25 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 17:53 -0400
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:50 -0400
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 18:02 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:35 -0700
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:52 -0700
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 12:25 -0700
                                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 13:41 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:53 -0600
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:51 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 13:03 -0400
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:50 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:59 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:05 -0700
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:02 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:00 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:06 -0700
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:30 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:58 -0700
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:30 -0700
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:56 -0700
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:18 -0600
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:32 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:19 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:47 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:43 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:30 -0700
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 12:54 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 13:38 -0700
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0400
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:27 -0700
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:45 -0700
    Re: You can't fix dead. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 15:24 -0700
      Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:54 -0600
        Re: You can't fix dead. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:15 +0200
          Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:32 -0600
            Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:04 -0700
              Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:35 -0600
              Re: You can't fix dead. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 16:49 -0400
                Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 14:01 -0700
                Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:57 -0600
                  Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
                    Re: You can't fix dead. Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:05 -0700
                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:45 -0700
                    Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:16 -0700
                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:55 -0700
                        Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:59 -0700
                          Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 17:22 -0700
                            Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:28 -0700
                              Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 18:38 -0700
                                Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 01:47 +0000
                                  Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 19:33 -0700
                                    Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:52 +0000
                                      Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:07 -0700
                                    Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 20:00 -0700
                                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0700
                                        Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0700
                                  Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:04 -0700
                                  Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:16 -0600
                                    Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
                                      Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:38 -0600
                                        Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:39 -0700
                                Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:03 -0700
                        Re: You can't fix dead. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 06:43 -0500
                    Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:13 -0600
                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:35 -0700
        Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 17:09 -0400
          Re: Ben Jacoby posts via Windows 10. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:39 -0400
        Re: You can't fix dead. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 18:51 -0700
          Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:03 -0700
        slower, still noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:37 -0700
          Re: slower, still Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 11:48 +0200
            Re: slower, still noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:17 -0700
      Re: You can't fix dead. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:50 -0400

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →


#598672

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-28 10:30 -0700
Message-ID<D4114C3C.7EBDD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598660
On 9/28/16, 9:22 AM, in article nsgqnp$5qm$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

...
>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like
>> snit. They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive
>> movement, which in my opinion is a communist movement. His actions
>> and methods speak louder than words ever will.
> 
> It's an absolute shock to me that the sniveling Prescott Parasite
> essentially repeats the exact arguments TV morons do to try to
> convince us. 

What argument? And where do you think I am wrong?

You refuse to say... you act just like Peter instead.

You have turned Peter Köhlmann into your hero.

> You'd think that a guy who believes himself to be smart
> would desire to have an opinion of his own rather than borrow that of
> the black guy they hired to replace Jon Stewart.

See: this attack of yours has NO basis in reality. None. It is not even
about my views.... or ANYTHING I have said. It is designed to put me on the
defensive and explain things about MY life... how I see Stewart's
replacement.

Since you bring it up, even though you are obsessed with me, I will tell
you: I do not like him at all and do not watch him. I have seen a few of his
bits and I do not find him funny or insightful. Even the clips I see of him
people pass around trying to show how clever or whatever he is I find to be
dull and shallow.

So, once again, you just flat out made up things about me... things that had
NOTHING to do with ANYTHING I have ever said. And you were, as is your norm,
wrong. 

Why do you do that? Because I have called you out on how you do not act like
a decent Christian and you actively work against the principle of
equality... you lie and you mindlessly follow conspiracy theorist whackos
such as Alex Jones... you lash out with hatred toward people who do not
share your religion.

You are, in short, a very bigoted person filled with fear and who cannot
stand others having the rights you do. You want special entitlements and
cannot understand why others might not want to give them to you. It is
selfish and short-sighted of you.

> On that note, I cancelled the Comedy Network in Canada. Not only is
> that replacement not funny but I was disgusted by how liberal
> comedians ripped Ann Coulter apart on the latest roast show. They
> targeted her when they were supposed to target Rob Lowe and the
> insults were so disgusting and insensitive that I would gladly boycott
> every one of the comedians, any show they are on and any channel that
> carries them. I'd rather watch PBS programming for the rest of my life
> on an antenna than give them even a cent of my money.

PBS is far from perfect but they are the most accurate source with the best
informed viewers. 

Comedy Central is, well, a comedy channel - but even then their viewers are
better informed than those of Fox. Which is amazing. Fox is a
dis-information channel... but to be main-stream conservative these days you
pretty much HAVE to actively reject facts. Even basic things like climate
change... you have to deny basic science to be accepted by most
conservatives. It is insane.

>>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to
>>>> do so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech
>>>> that the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial
>>>> Military Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money
>>>> off of war. This JFK took to heart and started the space
>>>> program so that these corporations could transition to space
>>>> exploration, rather than war time production.
>>> 
>>> Well said.
>> 
>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to
>> social engineering tactics that are just the opposite. He want's
>> division so that the progressives can win their agenda.
> 
> The sniveling Prescott Parasite just wants to troll. I suggest that
> you too filter the guy so that we can finally suffocate him and get
> him to leave.

See how you lash out time and time again. It is not that you even think I am
wrong... you just hate how I call you out on your call for personal special
entitlements. Boo hoo for you.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598665

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-28 08:56 -0700
Message-ID<D4113654.7EB7A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598651
On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

...
>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>> 
>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>> 
> 
> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.

Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.

>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>> 
>>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
>>> back up.
>> 
>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.
>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real
>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the
>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a
>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though
>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real
>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is
>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once
>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.
> 
> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex.  Going to war
> is not the answer.

Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that
reprehensible. 

> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by
> cutting useless government agencies and programs.  We don't need them.
> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot
> of expenditures.  I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal
> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries
> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more.  I
> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country
> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other
> countries that have bought up our debt.  This is where the real problem
> in this country is today... DEBT.  That's why these ranchers are being
> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of
> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to
> china.
> 
> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit.
> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in
> my opinion is a communist movement.
> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will.

Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in
any way. :)

>> 
>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
>>>> 
>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
>>> time production.
>> 
>> Well said.
>> 
> 
> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social
> engineering tactics that are just the opposite.
> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda.

The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID!


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598668

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-28 11:18 -0600
Message-ID<nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598665
On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>>>
>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>>>
>>
>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
>
> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.

Your beliefs are yours.
They are not mine.

>
>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>>>
>>>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
>>>> back up.
>>>
>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.
>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real
>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the
>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a
>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though
>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real
>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is
>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once
>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.
>>
>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex.  Going to war
>> is not the answer.
>
> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that
> reprehensible.

That is our gov. stance at the current time.
Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not 
wanting to hear the real truth.

>
>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by
>> cutting useless government agencies and programs.  We don't need them.
>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot
>> of expenditures.  I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal
>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries
>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more.  I
>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country
>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other
>> countries that have bought up our debt.  This is where the real problem
>> in this country is today... DEBT.  That's why these ranchers are being
>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of
>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to
>> china.
>>
>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit.
>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in
>> my opinion is a communist movement.
>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will.
>
> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in
> any way. :)
>

On gov. spending?  Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing 
to the table.
We'll all benefit from it in many ways.

>>>
>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
>>>> time production.
>>>
>>> Well said.
>>>
>>
>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social
>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite.
>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda.
>
> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID!
>

The "agenda" of course.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598673

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-28 10:32 -0700
Message-ID<D4114CD8.7EBDF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598668
On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote:
>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>> 
>> ...
>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>>>> 
>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
>> 
>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.
> 
> Your beliefs are yours.
> They are not mine.

Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally
tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise.

>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>>>> 
>>>>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
>>>>> back up.
>>>> 
>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.
>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real
>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the
>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a
>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though
>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real
>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is
>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once
>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.
>>> 
>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex.  Going to war
>>> is not the answer.
>> 
>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that
>> reprehensible.
> 
> That is our gov. stance at the current time.

Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry.

> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not
> wanting to hear the real truth.
> 
>> 
>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by
>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs.  We don't need them.
>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot
>>> of expenditures.  I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal
>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries
>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more.  I
>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country
>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other
>>> countries that have bought up our debt.  This is where the real problem
>>> in this country is today... DEBT.  That's why these ranchers are being
>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of
>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to
>>> china.
>>> 
>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit.
>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in
>>> my opinion is a communist movement.
>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will.
>> 
>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in
>> any way. :)
>> 
> 
> On gov. spending?

No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..."

I was being snarky in response to your insults.

> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing
> to the table.
> We'll all benefit from it in many ways.
> 
>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
>>>>> time production.
>>>> 
>>>> Well said.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social
>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite.
>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda.
>> 
>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID!
>> 
> 
> The "agenda" of course.

Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda."


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598700

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-28 14:19 -0600
Message-ID<nsh8ju$u2l$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598673
On 09/28/2016 11:32 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
>>>
>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.
>>
>> Your beliefs are yours.
>> They are not mine.
>
> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally
> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise.
>

Sure sounds like it.  You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war.

>>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
>>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
>>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
>>>>>> back up.
>>>>>
>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.
>>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real
>>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the
>>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a
>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though
>>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real
>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
>>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
>>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
>>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is
>>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once
>>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.
>>>>
>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex.  Going to war
>>>> is not the answer.
>>>
>>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that
>>> reprehensible.
>>
>> That is our gov. stance at the current time.
>
> Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry.
>

What nazi-like bigotry?
I haven't seen that yet.

>> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not
>> wanting to hear the real truth.
>>
>>>
>>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by
>>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs.  We don't need them.
>>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot
>>>> of expenditures.  I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal
>>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries
>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more.  I
>>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country
>>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other
>>>> countries that have bought up our debt.  This is where the real problem
>>>> in this country is today... DEBT.  That's why these ranchers are being
>>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of
>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to
>>>> china.
>>>>
>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit.
>>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in
>>>> my opinion is a communist movement.
>>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will.
>>>
>>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in
>>> any way. :)
>>>
>>
>> On gov. spending?
>
> No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..."
>
> I was being snarky in response to your insults.

And you weren't insulting?  LOL!!!
You do sound like a social warrior trying to get people to see things 
your way.  It won't work.

>
>> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing
>> to the table.
>> We'll all benefit from it in many ways.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
>>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
>>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
>>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
>>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
>>>>>> time production.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well said.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social
>>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite.
>>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda.
>>>
>>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID!
>>>
>>
>> The "agenda" of course.
>
> Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda."
>

No.  The communist agenda.  To overthrow this country.  Of course you 
may not be aware of the law, that says
anyone caught trying to overthrow this country may be either put in 
prison or shot to death.  You should realize now that Progressive = 
Communist.

You should read the Communist Manifesto.

http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598711

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-28 13:47 -0700
Message-ID<D4117A74.7EC62%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598700
On 9/28/16, 1:19 PM, in article nsh8ju$u2l$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

> On 09/28/2016 11:32 AM, Snit wrote:
>> On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ...
>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>>>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
>>>> 
>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.
>>> 
>>> Your beliefs are yours.
>>> They are not mine.
>> 
>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally
>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise.
>> 
> 
> Sure sounds like it.  You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war.

False dichotomy.

>>>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
>>>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
>>>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
>>>>>>> back up.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.
>>>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real
>>>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the
>>>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a
>>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though
>>>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real
>>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
>>>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
>>>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
>>>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is
>>>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once
>>>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex.  Going to war
>>>>> is not the answer.
>>>> 
>>>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that
>>>> reprehensible.
>>> 
>>> That is our gov. stance at the current time.
>> 
>> Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry.
> 
> What nazi-like bigotry?
> I haven't seen that yet.

We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying
it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you
and I. 

>>> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not
>>> wanting to hear the real truth.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by
>>>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs.  We don't need them.
>>>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot
>>>>> of expenditures.  I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal
>>>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries
>>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more.  I
>>>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country
>>>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other
>>>>> countries that have bought up our debt.  This is where the real problem
>>>>> in this country is today... DEBT.  That's why these ranchers are being
>>>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of
>>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to
>>>>> china.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit.
>>>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in
>>>>> my opinion is a communist movement.
>>>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will.
>>>> 
>>>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in
>>>> any way. :)
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> On gov. spending?
>> 
>> No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..."
>> 
>> I was being snarky in response to your insults.
> 
> And you weren't insulting?  LOL!!!
> You do sound like a social warrior trying to get people to see things
> your way.  It won't work.

I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by
emotion... so, no, it will not work.

>> 
>>> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing
>>> to the table.
>>> We'll all benefit from it in many ways.
>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
>>>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
>>>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
>>>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
>>>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>>>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>>>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
>>>>>>> time production.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well said.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social
>>>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite.
>>>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda.
>>>> 
>>>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID!
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> The "agenda" of course.
>> 
>> Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda."
>> 
> 
> No.  The communist agenda.  To overthrow this country.  Of course you
> may not be aware of the law, that says
> anyone caught trying to overthrow this country may be either put in
> prison or shot to death.  You should realize now that Progressive =
> Communist.
> 
> You should read the Communist Manifesto.
> 
> http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html

Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF?



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598792

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-29 10:43 -0600
Message-ID<nsjgbs$ajb$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598711
On 09/28/2016 02:47 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/28/16, 1:19 PM, in article nsh8ju$u2l$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/2016 11:32 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>>>>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
>>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.
>>>>
>>>> Your beliefs are yours.
>>>> They are not mine.
>>>
>>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally
>>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise.
>>>
>>
>> Sure sounds like it.  You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war.
>
> False dichotomy.

On what grounds?
I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist.

>
>>>>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
>>>>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
>>>>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
>>>>>>>> back up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.
>>>>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real
>>>>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the
>>>>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a
>>>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though
>>>>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real
>>>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
>>>>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
>>>>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
>>>>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is
>>>>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once
>>>>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex.  Going to war
>>>>>> is not the answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that
>>>>> reprehensible.
>>>>
>>>> That is our gov. stance at the current time.
>>>
>>> Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry.
>>
>> What nazi-like bigotry?
>> I haven't seen that yet.
>
> We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying
> it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you
> and I.
>

While the muslims are raping and killing americans?  You call that an 
attack?   Guffaw!!!

>>>> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not
>>>> wanting to hear the real truth.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by
>>>>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs.  We don't need them.
>>>>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot
>>>>>> of expenditures.  I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal
>>>>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries
>>>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more.  I
>>>>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country
>>>>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other
>>>>>> countries that have bought up our debt.  This is where the real problem
>>>>>> in this country is today... DEBT.  That's why these ranchers are being
>>>>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of
>>>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to
>>>>>> china.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit.
>>>>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in
>>>>>> my opinion is a communist movement.
>>>>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in
>>>>> any way. :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On gov. spending?
>>>
>>> No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..."
>>>
>>> I was being snarky in response to your insults.
>>
>> And you weren't insulting?  LOL!!!
>> You do sound like a social warrior trying to get people to see things
>> your way.  It won't work.
>
> I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by
> emotion... so, no, it will not work.

It is called Propaganda.  Some people think they are using logic, but 
they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion.

>
>>>
>>>> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing
>>>> to the table.
>>>> We'll all benefit from it in many ways.
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
>>>>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
>>>>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
>>>>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
>>>>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>>>>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>>>>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
>>>>>>>> time production.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social
>>>>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite.
>>>>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The "agenda" of course.
>>>
>>> Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda."
>>>
>>
>> No.  The communist agenda.  To overthrow this country.  Of course you
>> may not be aware of the law, that says
>> anyone caught trying to overthrow this country may be either put in
>> prison or shot to death.  You should realize now that Progressive =
>> Communist.
>>
>> You should read the Communist Manifesto.
>>
>> http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
>
> Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF?
>

Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday.
Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example.
I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598815

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
Message-ID<D412A51C.7EDF2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598792
On 9/29/16, 9:43 AM, in article nsjgbs$ajb$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

...
>>>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>>>>>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
>>>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Your beliefs are yours.
>>>>> They are not mine.
>>>> 
>>>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally
>>>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sure sounds like it.  You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war.
>> 
>> False dichotomy.
> 
> On what grounds?

Other than "logic" what are you looking for. Maybe you need to look up what
a false dichotomy is? You say I either want A or B... when the reality is I
want neither, and even worse it is almost certain that Trump will lead to
war.

Your comment is just not a logical statement on any level.

> I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist.

The communists do not even have a candidate they are running, no less one on
any ballot. 

... 
>> We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying
>> it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you
>> and I.
> 
> While the muslims are raping and killing americans?  You call that an
> attack?   Guffaw!!!

I am noting your gross bigotry and Nazi-like rhetoric.

... 
>> I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by
>> emotion... so, no, it will not work.
> 
> It is called Propaganda.  Some people think they are using logic, but
> they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion.

Not relevant to my point. Again: I am focused more on logic... you on
emotion. We are not going to see eye-to-eye.

... 
>> Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF?
> 
> Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday.
> Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example.
> I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then.

Not biting on your argument-by-emotion. Again, remember that I look for
evidence. 

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598892

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-29 21:52 -0600
Message-ID<nsknii$r61$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598815
On 09/29/2016 12:01 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/29/16, 9:43 AM, in article nsjgbs$ajb$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>>>>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>>>>>>>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>>>>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>>>>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
>>>>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your beliefs are yours.
>>>>>> They are not mine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally
>>>>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure sounds like it.  You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war.
>>>
>>> False dichotomy.
>>
>> On what grounds?
>
> Other than "logic" what are you looking for. Maybe you need to look up what
> a false dichotomy is? You say I either want A or B... when the reality is I
> want neither, and even worse it is almost certain that Trump will lead to
> war.

But that isn't what you were saying tho.  You have no proof that Trump 
will lead us to war.  Yet I showed you a video of Putin explaining this 
part to the bone-headed press.  Hillary wants WWIII because her big 
donors want it... mainly the central bank.  Even history has shown that, 
as well as General Smedley of the U.S.M.C., who said that war is a racket.
Only this time everyone loses.

>
> Your comment is just not a logical statement on any level.
>

That is so typical of the CIA.

>> I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist.
>
> The communists do not even have a candidate they are running, no less one on
> any ballot.

They refer to themselves as Socialists. And they are on the 2016 ballot.
That's how communists lie to the public, feeling that Socialism isn't 
communism.

>
> ...
>>> We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying
>>> it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you
>>> and I.
>>
>> While the muslims are raping and killing americans?  You call that an
>> attack?   Guffaw!!!
>
> I am noting your gross bigotry and Nazi-like rhetoric.
>

I am noticing your left-wing radical approach to propaganda that sits 
heavily against the law of the land too.

> ...
>>> I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by
>>> emotion... so, no, it will not work.
>>
>> It is called Propaganda.  Some people think they are using logic, but
>> they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion.
>
> Not relevant to my point. Again: I am focused more on logic... you on
> emotion. We are not going to see eye-to-eye.
>

Guffaw!!!  Very much relevant.  You just don't want to hear it is all.

> ...
>>> Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF?
>>
>> Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday.
>> Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example.
>> I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then.
>
> Not biting on your argument-by-emotion. Again, remember that I look for
> evidence.
>

So you don't want liberty then.  Fine by me, and don't forget when FEMA 
comes around, just hop into their van.  They'll feed you and house you.
Later they expect some work out of you too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598914

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-29 21:30 -0700
Message-ID<D413387A.7EEC8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598892
On 9/29/16, 8:52 PM, in article nsknii$r61$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

...
>>>>> Sure sounds like it.  You don't want Trump in office, so you must want
>>>>> war.
>>>> 
>>>> False dichotomy.
>>> 
>>> On what grounds?
>> 
>> Other than "logic" what are you looking for. Maybe you need to look up what
>> a false dichotomy is? You say I either want A or B... when the reality is I
>> want neither, and even worse it is almost certain that Trump will lead to
>> war.
> 
> But that isn't what you were saying tho.  You have no proof that Trump
> will lead us to war.

We cannot prove the future so this is true of anyone.

> Yet I showed you a video of Putin explaining this part to the bone-headed
> press.  Hillary wants WWIII because her big donors want it... mainly the
> central bank. 

And this is just silly. Same nonsense they said about Obama. Remember: I
look for evidence and data and not just your feelings.

> Even history has shown that, as well as General Smedley of the
> U.S.M.C., who said that war is a racket. Only this time everyone loses.

Both are likely to lead to war.

>> Your comment is just not a logical statement on any level.
>
> That is so typical of the CIA.

Er?
 
>>> I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist.
>> 
>> The communists do not even have a candidate they are running, no less one on
>> any ballot.
> 
> They refer to themselves as Socialists.

The Socialists do not have a candidate, AND they are not the same as the
Communists.

These are simple facts. Again: your denial of facts is just silly.

> And they are on the 2016 ballot.

This is not true. 

> That's how communists lie to the public, feeling that Socialism isn't
> communism.

At this point you have to be trolling.

...
>> I am noting your gross bigotry and Nazi-like rhetoric.
> 
> I am noticing your left-wing radical approach to propaganda that sits
> heavily against the law of the land too.

Keep in mind you deem reality to be "left-wing radical"... so your comments
on that are not exactly strong. :)

>> ...
>>>> I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by
>>>> emotion... so, no, it will not work.
>>> 
>>> It is called Propaganda.  Some people think they are using logic, but
>>> they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion.
>> 
>> Not relevant to my point. Again: I am focused more on logic... you on
>> emotion. We are not going to see eye-to-eye.
> 
> Guffaw!!!  Very much relevant.  You just don't want to hear it is all.

At some point you might actually try to support your claims. But I doubt it.
:)

>> ...
>>>> Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF?
>>> 
>>> Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday.
>>> Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example.
>>> I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then.
>> 
>> Not biting on your argument-by-emotion. Again, remember that I look for
>> evidence.
> 
> So you don't want liberty then.

LOL! See: pure emotion from you. NO logic.

> Fine by me, and don't forget when FEMA comes around, just hop into their van.
> They'll feed you and house you. Later they expect some work out of you too.

Again: at this point you have to just be trolling. Right?



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598845

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-29 12:54 -0700
Message-ID<edffb479-f904-40c7-adce-7e5cc7f757b1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#598792
On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 9:43:55 AM UTC-7, GreyCloud wrote:
> On 09/28/2016 02:47 PM, Snit wrote:
> > On 9/28/16, 1:19 PM, in article nsh8ju$u2l$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/28/2016 11:32 AM, Snit wrote:
> >>> On 9/28/16, 10:18 AM, in article nsgu1g$i38$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> >>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 09/28/2016 09:56 AM, Snit wrote:
> >>>>> On 9/28/16, 8:32 AM, in article nsgnqs$rb3$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> >>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
> >>>>>>>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
> >>>>>>>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
> >>>>>>>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
> >>>>>>>> deal than Hillary ever will.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It sounds like snit wants this war to happen.  If he is on any kind of
> >>>>>> subsistence packages, this war will take it away from him.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Remember: what "sounds" to you is not relevant to my beliefs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Your beliefs are yours.
> >>>> They are not mine.
> >>>
> >>> Correct: so when you say I want "this war" to happen I can unequivocally
> >>> tell you that you are wrong, even if it "seems" to you otherwise.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sure sounds like it.  You don't want Trump in office, so you must want war.
> >
> > False dichotomy.
> 
> On what grounds?
> I'd prefer a Mason in office over a dumb communist.
> 
> >
> >>>>>>>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
> >>>>>>>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
> >>>>>>>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
> >>>>>>>> back up.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.
> >>>>>>> During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that Soviets were a real
> >>>>>>> threat and it allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on the
> >>>>>>> military. Then, they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a
> >>>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though
> >>>>>>> the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real
> >>>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
> >>>>>>> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
> >>>>>>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
> >>>>>>> for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that Russia is
> >>>>>>> the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once
> >>>>>>> again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex.  Going to war
> >>>>>> is not the answer.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find that
> >>>>> reprehensible.
> >>>>
> >>>> That is our gov. stance at the current time.
> >>>
> >>> Trump is pushing much of the same Nazi-like bigotry.
> >>
> >> What nazi-like bigotry?
> >> I haven't seen that yet.
> >
> > We already talked about his attacks on Muslims. And then you agreed saying
> > it is not their country... when Muslim Americans are as much citizens as you
> > and I.
> >
> 
> While the muslims are raping and killing americans?  You call that an 
> attack?   Guffaw!!!
> 
> >>>> Any other belief would be the ostrich with its head in the sand, not
> >>>> wanting to hear the real truth.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Trump actually wants to reduce our spending by
> >>>>>> cutting useless government agencies and programs.  We don't need them.
> >>>>>> By removing our forces from all around the world we'd save an awful lot
> >>>>>> of expenditures.  I'm not sure if he will dump the entire federal
> >>>>>> reserve system, but it is already being dumped by other countries
> >>>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole lot more.  I
> >>>>>> figure by repudiating the debt to the obscene bankers, this country
> >>>>>> would be out of debt, but we have to find a way to pay back to other
> >>>>>> countries that have bought up our debt.  This is where the real problem
> >>>>>> in this country is today... DEBT.  That's why these ranchers are being
> >>>>>> kicked off their land so that our government can pay off that part of
> >>>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to
> >>>>>> china.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like snit.
> >>>>>> They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive movement, which in
> >>>>>> my opinion is a communist movement.
> >>>>>> His actions and methods speak louder than words ever will.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Your first five words are the only ones of that paragraph which are true in
> >>>>> any way. :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On gov. spending?
> >>>
> >>> No, when you said: "It is hard to reason..."
> >>>
> >>> I was being snarky in response to your insults.
> >>
> >> And you weren't insulting?  LOL!!!
> >> You do sound like a social warrior trying to get people to see things
> >> your way.  It won't work.
> >
> > I am using logic and reason to try to "convince" someone swayed by
> > emotion... so, no, it will not work.
> 
> It is called Propaganda.  Some people think they are using logic, but 
> they use their logic with false data, creating a false conclusion.
> 
> >
> >>>
> >>>> Of course. And that is precisely what he is bringing
> >>>> to the table.
> >>>> We'll all benefit from it in many ways.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
> >>>>>>>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
> >>>>>>>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
> >>>>>>>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
> >>>>>>>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
> >>>>>>>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
> >>>>>>>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
> >>>>>>>> time production.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well said.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to social
> >>>>>> engineering tactics that are just the opposite.
> >>>>>> He want's division so that the progressives can win their agenda.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The "agenda" of equal rights. HOW HORRID!
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The "agenda" of course.
> >>>
> >>> Of equal rights? That, I think, is the primary "Progressive agenda."
> >>>
> >>
> >> No.  The communist agenda.  To overthrow this country.  Of course you
> >> may not be aware of the law, that says
> >> anyone caught trying to overthrow this country may be either put in
> >> prison or shot to death.  You should realize now that Progressive =
> >> Communist.
> >>
> >> You should read the Communist Manifesto.
> >>
> >> http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
> >
> > Why change the topic to Communists? Seriously, WTF?
> >
> 
> Because they are the ones pushing all this crap in our faces everyday.
> Like "Politically Correct Speech" as an example.
> I take it you don't want anybody to have liberty then.

Treb would make the best president .That means computers of the future make the best thinking for humankind.When I had a web TV I was told to get a "real computer" by snobs.I did and now one of the snobs. Reality is for humankind to goverment themselves is "suicide "We have evolved in time to know that is true.Computers can be kind.Man is wolf to man(Darwin)  Go with Treb and you will always have bread. go with Trump and Waste Management will take you to their dump.( TANG)  Go with Hillary and bring a Cuban Cigar. Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598859

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-09-29 13:38 -0700
Message-ID<nsju7p$v23$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598845
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> the schizo &
senile Cretin Glazier hears voices in his head, that he calls
"Treb" and so <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine> which
became the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier>
fanasized that "Treb would make the best president .[..]  I had a 
web TV I was told to get a "real computer" by snobs. Go with 
Treb and you will always have Waste to dump" like Glazier  does
here <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>,
and gives his reason for it in the above links, wherein...

>
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier, the Hater
 is as bad as Ayaz Siddiqi who is a complete idiot, just like Bert is, 
who can't Get a life and always Get lost. But never talk of killing 
people, which Glazier routinely does, For the sake of Glazier's 
mental healh...... all of which can be seen when...
>
... the  sanctimonious Full-Swine Glazier who often posts:
"god and religion is hocus pocus" and now that
Glazier is doing his final twitching he trembles and prays:
"Open Mind of God.  Best to go with God, and be nice"
>
hanson wrote:
But Glazier you Swine, it is YOU  that is NOT nice, and things
have not gotten any better because YOU came back after you
wrote:
>
Full Swine & Cretin Glazier wrote:
> "Why am I not loved by all?"
> "I might leave if things do not get better"..because...
>
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier whose G=EMC^2 is
short for "Glazier Exhibits Micro Cephalic Cretinism", (Zika
& or by his genetic ashkeNazi marker) defines Bert, reber
Trebert, or Treb as the loud mouth, the misogynic Peeping
Tom (lifts & looks under the shirts of girls) the Jewish Jailbird,
the Liar, Hatemonger, schizoid mental cripple, Pervert Face-
Shitter, criminal Graveyard vandal, Bigot, Racist, War-monger
& Communist :B::ert Glazier who introduces himself with/as....
>
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
:B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
:B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
:B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
:B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
:B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
:B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
:B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
:B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
:B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
:B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
about which ....
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
"Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
"Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
>
"Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street."
"Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
"Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
>
"reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" .
"reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.:
"reber, you don't believe in science."
>
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
"Harlow Campbell" succinctly added & wrote:
>
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker"....
"Bert you are senile, dazed & confused"
"Bert, you are Fucked in the head.
>
"Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike."
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
>
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
>
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot"... .... .... about which....
 >
Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
You know nothing about government nor physics.
You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
 >
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
>
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
>
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I know, you reber are an idiot. Glazier, you are babbling
desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for?
Stop it, either way.
 >
benj" Benjamin Franklin Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> who
recently nymshifted to "B Gates" <nobodyxx@gmail>, wrote:
>
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is...
and promote that shitting into a bucket in a car is an achievement
that is a laudable accomplishment... and both being Communists
they demand entitlement to goods and services that were created
by hardworking people while they themselves drink, party and frolic!...
... still waiting "to be loved by all"...
>
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old Minnie Mouse van that you use as your residence
on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
 >
 "What are they gonna say when Swine Glazier dies? Are
they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
which Glazier, the Full-Swine, announced and posted at
the ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
>
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
 >
Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
Glazier proudly announced & posted...
 >
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always
post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after
which...
 >
Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
threatened...
 >
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
after...
>
(4)
The Criminal Swine Glazier rejected to recant, disavow & apologize,
and refused to stop his practices & because Glazier at his age of 87+,
Swine Glazier labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym
with "Bowel-movement, acceting that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
legs"... and that Glazier, also being a Peeping Tom, enjoys lifting &
loooking up under the skirts of girls...
 >
hanson wrote:
Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
"put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
legacy, is because:
 >
Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
.... "hanson made me famous"....
 >
hanson wrote
So, Glazier you Swine, you should be grateful to me & not wish
me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>
--- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
--- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>
which is why  the mental cripple <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>
badly needs to be administered to with
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> ...
>
Now Glazier, you filthy Swine, "you will never be loved by all"
but incredibly, Glazier, you do have groupies who love you,
and haved become, voluntarily,  your personal slaves of you,
Faceshitter Glazier, who demonstrate their worship & their
devotion to their master Glazier, by lying under & literally
shit-eating Glazier's turds:
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
such as:
>
=1=
Sefton "john" <johnsefton288@gmail.com> the delusional
vegetarian loud-mouth from Canuckistan's town of Regina
is under the influence of his Lysergic- and  Solanine
contaminated diet and so Sefton lays himself with gusto
under Face-shitter Glazier's Sphincter and enjoys eating
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
and Sefton is impressed also with the Hate-mongering of
>
=2=
<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> is Iran's Glazier.
The Freak Muslime Mehram Maleki HATES Western
culture & the USA, hates Xtians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists,
even Sunnis.  Yet Maldrecki lays himself freely UNDER
the Sphincter of Face shitter Jew Glazier who bragged
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
to have _"PFM"_= "Poop For Maleki", which the gay, Iranian
Muslime, Maldrecki, consumed until he turned black
& posted his <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-Mehram-Selfie>
>
Then the 88 Year old Glazier announced that "Glazier is a
Transvestite who dons female dresses & a Sarah Palin mask,
saying that he has "nice legs"... which so impressed Maldrecki
that Maleki showed his devotion and solidarity by going LGBT
& had a Sex change operation, whose result she posted in
<http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-the-TG-Girl>.
>
=3=
"AA" <double-a3@hush.com>  is __Glazier's "Ass Angel"__,
aka "Abner Afterduft", the "Alcoholic  Addict" who struts with
his "AmoebA" brain, posted and yearns to be like Glazier, &
"AA" doubles as "Anon Yidd. Mouse", <nobody@home.invalid>
who does NOT mind that Full-swine Glazier is a Face shitter
& a criminal Grave yard vandal, & Glazier who never recanted
nor apologized for the overt criminal threats Glazier made.... ....
>> >
...aux contraire, "AA", who is __Glazier's "Ass Angel"__,
comes to the aid of Full Swine Glazier's criminality, & worse,
the Jewish Pig "AA" cum "Anon Yidd Mouse", curses folks that
point at Glazier's behavior, which makes Yidd Mouse to be an "AA"
example of the lurid "Closeness" which the eminent Jewish Scholar
Harold Wallace Rosenthal ||R:|| describes in his epic
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
wherein it says:
||R:|| We Jews have a solidarity & a closeness to
||R:|| fellow Jews like none other in the world.
||R:|| We Jews are always 'as one' when it counts.
>
||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect
||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies.
||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours.
||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows
||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim
>
=4=
Strangely, the Austrian Hitleryouth Halbmutt Wabnigger,
<hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> sides with Glazier too, but said:
____   "Jews are a residue of failed evolution" _______
>
=5=
Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>, the "Rectal Vacuumist (Seattle) is a criminal
Child-support dead-beat who greedily sucks turds out of Glazier's
sphincter, especially when they are Methamphetamine preloaded
as seen when Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>::JR:: wrote:
::JR:: I no longer want sex anymore.  I  masturbate. I've found  that
::JR:: all these erections & masturbations can irratate my prostate.
::JR:: My problem mostly happens a few hours before I want to
::JR:: wake up, so I can't take Sudafed.
::JR:: Ejaculation is a mind-altering drug, no better than heroin
::JR:: or meth.    So I've recently vowed to not masturbate...
::JR:: I use my left hand to smoke, masturbate and to type ...
::JR:: Does that make me smart ? --  I'd rather masturbate.
::JR:: She likes to squirt meth up her rear ( it makes her cum).
::JR:: but pussy is the last thing I want.
::::::: (cuz Relf is apparently interested now, with his "mouth wide
:::::::  open", to let Swine Glazier shit into Relf's "kisser")
::JR:: My dreams, however, have been semi-erotic as of late..."
>
=6=
... and even earlier, ironically, signed up was kike "Bodaisky",
<root@localhost.localdomain> who lied and claimed to be
"Bo Dai" from China, but was in fact "Fagie Bodaisky", who
lives off the tips he gets from being a rest-room attendant in
a NY Bath house for gay Jews.
>
=7=
"Andrew Vecsey" posting as <trudi.schwander@gmail.com>
is another AshkeNAZI pervert, a twat mimicker, who enjoys
spending her time under Glazier's Sphincter like the ones above.
Like those pigs s/he does NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging
to be a Face shitter and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but
s/he objects and groans when that is pointed out & comes
runnning to defend and side with Full-Swine Glazier, just like
seen in =3= & <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
=8=
The Wal-Mart Greeter "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com>
Mark L. Fergerson is another stupid & despicably filthy pig that
enjoys spending his time under Glazier's Sphincter like the 7
ones above. Like those 7 other pigs, the Wal-Mart Greeter Ferkel
does NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging to be a Face shitter
and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but says that Glazier's criminal
behavior, like Glazier's looking up/under the skirts of girls, is
"not abusive" & insists that "Us old-timers gotta stick together."
>
=9=
Israeli Zionist Yehiel Porat <poraty350@gmail.com> is another
80 year old AshkeNAZI pervert, who enjoys spending his time
under Glazier's Sphincter like those pigs above who do NOT mind
that Jew Glazier is bragging to be a Face shitter and a criminal
Grave yard vandal, but object and groans when that is pointed
out & come to defend and side with Full-Swine Glazier, just like
seen in =3= & <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
>
This bizarre perversion is well documented as seen here in:
<http://tinyurl.com/magnum-opus-the-rectal-jew>
<https://theendofzion.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/>
<https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=jewish+coprophilia>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598686

FromSilver Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-09-28 15:07 -0400
Message-ID<nsh4di$dst$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598668
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-09-28 1:18 PM, the sniveling Prescott Parasite rambled:

>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find
>> that reprehensible.

The only Nazi here is _you_ . You're the only twat in this newsgroup
who is a brain-dead liberal who believes that things need to be done
his way and that everything else is wrong. Nazism was based on
censoring, propaganda and lies and that's exactly what _YOU_ do Adolf
Glasser Prescott Computer Nazi. Just take note of how you very gladly
told all Linux users that the way their desktop environments work is
wrong and then explain to me how your position promotes freedom.
Disgusting little turd.

- -- 
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7BT9AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+u8rgH/1YzSwU37yl0IDhHq3DD+gaW
IPofHCqCxGosXXrzw8eChxeAHjc76BBvdGj/OzrY5Ifqh6sUNYQwqgDsweV0JsvJ
uy1narH34auc2QI1Ur66nMohBG/tBA+rIb9piYbb5ayx8Ueq8aQR7NYlZmw93Haa
ed1zMPW/Rh26xIyAy4RBH7fJe3FRr3jXA3JaDj2JWmricqMM59P36aRgAIbhS4os
j+RC1Wvwp8wgFxnBxz478zFYN+5Tap/9aRw2dEIqBXFBv62gz5JkUlom5xJ+vg+Q
lBZFHjWrYWlw/j4hvN9V51U2I65nnz4c+MSxoAZTWoNUpkWHR8o+WcVuAb1/gC0=
=VpYE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598690

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-28 12:27 -0700
Message-ID<D41167AF.7EC25%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598686
On 9/28/16, 12:07 PM, in article nsh4di$dst$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 2016-09-28 1:18 PM, the sniveling Prescott Parasite rambled:
> 
>>> Neither is Nazi-like bigotry that Slimer speaks of having. I find
>>> that reprehensible.
> 
> The only Nazi here is _you_ .

You are the one who pushes Nazi-like hatred of other groups and back a
candidate who speaks of using Nazi-like techniques of making groups have
special IDs.

You can twist and lie all you want... but that is the truth.

> You're the only twat in this newsgroup who is a brain-dead liberal who
> believes that things need to be done his way and that everything else is
> wrong.

Done whose way?

> Nazism was based on censoring, propaganda and lies and that's exactly
> what _YOU_ do Adolf Glasser Prescott Computer Nazi.

A direct lie from you.

> Just take note of how you very gladly told all Linux users that the way their
> desktop environments work is wrong and then explain to me how your position
> promotes freedom. Disgusting little turd.

What do you even mean here? There environment is "wrong"... for what? Use
what you like. 

Remember: I am the one who promotes equal rights... and you are the one who
argues I am wrong. 


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598662

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-28 08:45 -0700
Message-ID<D41133A2.7EB6D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598634
On 9/28/16, 4:55 AM, in article nsgb42$d7b$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 2016-09-27 6:51 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me,
>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me,
>>>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected
>>>>>>> their least liked, least trusted candidates. It is rather
>>>>>>> insane.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump
>>>>>>> gets in then the bigots will have justification to push
>>>>>>> their bigotry more... but that is about it. In four years
>>>>>>> we will have a back-lash from either.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be
>>>>>> WWIII.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>>> 
>>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex
>>> Jones?
>>> 
>>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>>> 
>>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason
>>> to back him!
> 
> OH MY GOD! A leader at the other side of the world who has no impact
> whatsoever on the United States backs one of the candidates?

No impact? LOL!

I look forward to you backing THAT on!

> Run for the hills! What an _idiotic_ decision not to back a candidate.

Which is not what was being discussed. To be clear: you made that up.

> This Prescott Parasite is truly a sponge for whatever the mainstream media
> says. 

What? You use that line over and over but do not even show you understand
what that insult means. It is like you heard Alex Jones say it as an insult,
did not understand it, and now repeat it over and over. Weird.

> At the very least, knowing that a foreign leader that is hard to deal
> with approves of you _facilitates_ diplomacy with that nation in the future.
> If anything, it's a reason *TO* back Trump you sniveling little snot.

Ah, so if Iraq and Iran back a candidate that would push you to?

LOL!

Logic is not your strong area. :)

>> What have you got against putin? All he wanted to do was do
>> business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on his border.  Russia
>> doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only have two.  So who
>> is surrounding who? At least Trump can do business and get a better
>> deal than Hillary ever will.
> 
> Absolutely correct. Reason and logic escape the Prescott Parasite.

Trump is not a good businessman... basic logic.

But you have insults and nothing else.

>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>> 
>> 
>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the
>> early 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest
>> manner in what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB
>> back up.
> 
> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of something.

Such as Muslims. Trump is pushing that, too. Oh, and blacks and the poor.

And you buy into ALL of that. It is, sadly, like watching Nazi Germany
happen again -- the weakest of the population are blamed for the wrongs and
you eat it up and spew your bigoted hatred.

...
> Having Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires
> real spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does
> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their job and
> for administrations to deport them.

Deport people for their religion! Seriously, just go to hell. That is the
antithesis of what America is about. That is the antithesis to reason and
logic and common sense. That is the antithesis to equal rights.

You are completely and absolutely against equal rights.

> Why do you think that Russia is the target of all hate?

What hate? Keep in mind YOU are the only one demonstrating hatred of anyone.
YOU.

> The sniveling little
> Prescott Parasite once again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic.

Projection on your part.

>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your
>>>> affairs in order as you'll get drafted.
>>> 
>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>> 
>> 
>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do
>> so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that
>> the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military
>> Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war
>> time production.
> 
> Well said.

Trump is an emotional child who spends time in presidential debates
defending his sexist attacks and denying his own record time and time again.




-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598546 — Re: You can't fix dead.

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-09-27 15:24 -0700
SubjectRe: You can't fix dead.
Message-ID<57EAF1A3.65DE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#598424
Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ):
> > > Hillary is better informed and more factual,
> > > but Trump has more energy.
> > > Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst.
> >
> > I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions...
> > a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)
> 
> Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone.
> I doubt he could Google, much less read the results.
> 
> NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse.
> He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be.
> You can't fix dead.



You don't send emails to the Mafia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598556 — Re: You can't fix dead.

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-27 16:54 -0600
SubjectRe: You can't fix dead.
Message-ID<nset9v$p9s$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598546
On 09/27/2016 04:24 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>
>> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ):
>>>> Hillary is better informed and more factual,
>>>> but Trump has more energy.
>>>> Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst.
>>>
>>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions...
>>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)
>>
>> Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone.
>> I doubt he could Google, much less read the results.
>>
>> NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse.
>> He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be.
>> You can't fix dead.
>
>
>
> You don't send emails to the Mafia.
>

A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't 
do with a computer?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598564 — Re: You can't fix dead.

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2016-09-28 01:15 +0200
SubjectRe: You can't fix dead.
Message-ID<nseuht$st4$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598556
GreyCloud wrote:

> On 09/27/2016 04:24 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>
>>> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ):
>>>>> Hillary is better informed and more factual,
>>>>> but Trump has more energy.
>>>>> Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst.
>>>>
>>>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions...
>>>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)
>>>
>>> Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone.
>>> I doubt he could Google, much less read the results.
>>>
>>> NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse.
>>> He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be.
>>> You can't fix dead.
>>
>>
>>
>> You don't send emails to the Mafia.
>>
> 
> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't
> do with a computer?

Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598583 — Re: You can't fix dead.

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-27 18:32 -0600
SubjectRe: You can't fix dead.
Message-ID<nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598564
On 09/27/2016 05:15 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> GreyCloud wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2016 04:24 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>> Hillary is better informed and more factual,
>>>>>> but Trump has more energy.
>>>>>> Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions...
>>>>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)
>>>>
>>>> Trump is a technophobe, he's never emailed anyone.
>>>> I doubt he could Google, much less read the results.
>>>>
>>>> NoneTheLess, he makes Hillary look like a corpse.
>>>> He could _hire_ someone to Google for him, if need be.
>>>> You can't fix dead.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You don't send emails to the Mafia.
>>>
>>
>> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't
>> do with a computer?
>
> Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can
>

I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his 
speeches this year.  After all, he is a successful business man that the 
chimp ever was (G.W. Bush).
I think he knows how they work.  Hillary has already said she knows 
little of computers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598595 — Re: You can't fix dead.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-27 18:04 -0700
SubjectRe: You can't fix dead.
Message-ID<D4106510.7EAA0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598583
On 9/27/16, 5:32 PM, in article nsf32d$7ue$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

>>>> You don't send emails to the Mafia.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> A better question here is how would Jeff know what Trump can and can't
>>> do with a computer?
>> 
>> Well, he can certainly use it as a doorstep. That is basically all he can
>> 
> 
> I think that a lot of people haven't actually watched or listened to his
> speeches this year.  After all, he is a successful business man that the
> chimp ever was (G.W. Bush).
> I think he knows how they work.  Hillary has already said she knows
> little of computers.

Getting a huge loan from your daddy and then handling it less well than
investing in the stock market does NOT make one a good businessman.

Nor does screwing over others and not caring one whit... which he basically
bragged about in the debate. He does not even care about looking like a
decent person.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web