Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #598424 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-26 22:09 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-28 07:50 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 22:09 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-27 09:01 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-27 12:08 -0500
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:17 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 12:13 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:23 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 15:07 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:51 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:16 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 09:49 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 08:04 -0500
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 15:42 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:16 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:14 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:28 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 07:02 -0500
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:17 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:30 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:07 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:22 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:52 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:15 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 11:13 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:11 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:45 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:40 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:21 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:45 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:55 +0000
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:08 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:23 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:35 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:38 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:05 +0200
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 17:04 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:04 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:55 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:32 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:22 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:23 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:35 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:21 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:48 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:46 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:24 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:17 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:55 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:26 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:22 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:12 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:24 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:24 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:49 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:47 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:25 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 17:53 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:50 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 18:02 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:35 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:52 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 12:25 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 13:41 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:53 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:51 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 13:03 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:50 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:59 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:05 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:02 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:00 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:06 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:30 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:58 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:30 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:56 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:18 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:32 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:19 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:43 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0600
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:30 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 12:54 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 13:38 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0400
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:27 -0700
Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:45 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 15:24 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:54 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:15 +0200
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:32 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:04 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:35 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 16:49 -0400
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 14:01 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:57 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:05 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:45 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:16 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:55 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:59 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 17:22 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:28 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 18:38 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 01:47 +0000
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 19:33 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:52 +0000
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:07 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 20:00 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:04 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:16 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:38 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:39 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:03 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 06:43 -0500
Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:13 -0600
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:35 -0700
Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 17:09 -0400
Re: Ben Jacoby posts via Windows 10. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:39 -0400
Re: You can't fix dead. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 18:51 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:03 -0700
slower, still noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:37 -0700
Re: slower, still Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 11:48 +0200
Re: slower, still noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:17 -0700
Re: You can't fix dead. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:50 -0400
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D413389A.7EEC9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #598896 |
On 9/29/16, 8:56 PM, in article nsknot$r61$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > On 09/29/2016 11:25 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/29/16, 9:47 AM, in article nsjgir$ajb$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> >>> On 09/28/2016 02:49 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 9/28/16, 1:24 PM, in article nsh8tn$v6q$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> That is standard playbook tactics of the rabid left. Trump is >>>>>>> well aware of this, and even in the first debate he said that >>>>>>> doesn't work anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> And he's right. Anyone who watched the debate saw Trump demolish >>>>>> Hillary for most of it. Anyone who relied on snippets or the media's >>>>>> interpretation believes that Hillary was the clear winner. It's >>>>>> stupidity like that which discredits the media but they know that they >>>>>> have no credibility left (except in the eyes of the sniveling Prescott >>>>>> Parasite) so they're going all in. 8% of America believes them... 8% >>>>> >>>>> Agree. CNN said that Hillary won the debate. CNN was questioned as to >>>>> how they arrived at that conclusion. A poll was done. They asked CNN >>>>> how they conducted that poll. Oh, 500 democrats is who they polled and >>>>> much fewer republicans. LOL!!! Yeah, that was really scientific of them. >>>> >>>> I would love to see evidence of this. >>>> >>> >>> Go to http://www.cnn.com >> >> Went. No evidence of your claim. I think we can safely say you made it up. >> OK. > > Just like your CIA friends that do the same. Fabricate evidence and > claim it is evidence. > > Guffaw!!! > >> >>> Also, Michael Savage as well where he delineated the results. >> >> He is not relevant. You said what CNN did... but you made it up. >> >> OK, so you made something up. Next. >> >> > > Guffaw!!! This is all that the CIA offers... lies and more lies. So you have given up even pretending to make a point. OK. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 17:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nshe5b$gq1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598702 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-09-28 4:24 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 09/28/2016 01:12 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 2016-09-28 1:23 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 09/28/2016 10:22 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> On 2016-09-28 11:32 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>> < snip > >>>> >>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of >>>>>> something. During the Cold War, they convinced Americans >>>>>> that Soviets were a real threat and it allowed them to >>>>>> spend inordinate amounts of money on the military. Then, >>>>>> they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again >>>>>> even though the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown >>>>>> themselves to be the real issue. Having Russia as an >>>>>> enemy is profitable because it requires real spending on >>>>>> military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does not >>>>>> because all it requires is for law enforcement to do >>>>>> their job and for administrations to deport them. Why do >>>>>> you think that Russia is the target of all hate? The >>>>>> sniveling little Prescott Parasite once again >>>>>> demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>>> >>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. >>>>> Going to war is not the answer. Trump actually wants to >>>>> reduce our spending by cutting useless government agencies >>>>> and programs. We don't need them. By removing our forces >>>>> from all around the world we'd save an awful lot of >>>>> expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire >>>>> federal reserve system, but it is already being dumped by >>>>> other countries anyway, so trump may as well dump them and >>>>> save a whole lot more. I figure by repudiating the debt to >>>>> the obscene bankers, this country would be out of debt, but >>>>> we have to find a way to pay back to other countries that >>>>> have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem in >>>>> this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers >>>>> are being kicked off their land so that our government can >>>>> pay off that part of the debt to other countries, namely >>>>> China, by giving our lands away to china. >>>> >>>> Is that what they're doing with the lands? I do know that >>>> they're essentially confiscating them but to what end was >>>> unknown to me. If this is true, it is despicable and even a >>>> sniveling little turd like Snit shouldn't be supporting it. >>> >>> Clintons made the deal of Selling Uranium from the last Bureau >>> of Land Management land grab. She profited heavily from the >>> deal. >>> >>>> >>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice >>>>> warrior like snit. They've been totally brain-washed by >>>>> the progressive movement, which in my opinion is a >>>>> communist movement. His actions and methods speak louder >>>>> than words ever will. >>>> >>>> It's an absolute shock to me that the sniveling Prescott >>>> Parasite essentially repeats the exact arguments TV morons do >>>> to try to convince us. You'd think that a guy who believes >>>> himself to be smart would desire to have an opinion of his >>>> own rather than borrow that of the black guy they hired to >>>> replace Jon Stewart. >>>> >>> >>> Propaganda really isn't a bad word, it is used to persuade >>> people into thinking their way. A well crafted propaganda >>> piece can go a long way. >> >> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a citizen. >> For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can convince men >> to serve their country and protect its people against a foreign >> power or to put money in bonds. For that purpose, propaganda is >> great. However, today's propaganda is that everything left-wing >> is good and everything right-wing is bad. Just the other day, a >> German magazine published an article warning readers of the >> "danger" of right-wing families. They appear joyous and their >> children are obedient... the monsters! >> > > I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last > spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing their > panic. I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to actually believe that article have Glasser as a last name. >>>> On that note, I cancelled the Comedy Network in Canada. Not >>>> only is that replacement not funny but I was disgusted by how >>>> liberal comedians ripped Ann Coulter apart on the latest >>>> roast show. They targeted her when they were supposed to >>>> target Rob Lowe and the insults were so disgusting and >>>> insensitive that I would gladly boycott every one of the >>>> comedians, any show they are on and any channel that carries >>>> them. I'd rather watch PBS programming for the rest of my >>>> life on an antenna than give them even a cent of my money. >>>> >>> >>> That is standard playbook tactics of the rabid left. Trump is >>> well aware of this, and even in the first debate he said that >>> doesn't work anymore. >> >> And he's right. Anyone who watched the debate saw Trump demolish >> Hillary for most of it. Anyone who relied on snippets or the >> media's interpretation believes that Hillary was the clear >> winner. It's stupidity like that which discredits the media but >> they know that they have no credibility left (except in the eyes >> of the sniveling Prescott Parasite) so they're going all in. 8% >> of America believes them... 8% >> > > Agree. CNN said that Hillary won the debate. CNN was questioned > as to how they arrived at that conclusion. A poll was done. They > asked CNN how they conducted that poll. Oh, 500 democrats is who > they polled and much fewer republicans. LOL!!! Yeah, that was > really scientific of them. I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get things done. Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now found "ideas." She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she was everywhere else and needs to be kept away from the position. Trump put her against the wall and should have gone farther but still decimated her regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7Dv1AAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uod0H/2izfO/6/9lGhO9Nx6dzF1C6 MelCZTiI9f/VGqCwRI0gX1blW7X4wxc164eJ/Icdph7ysIoeEfS1BEzjJcWvFnY0 J4GBVx9eKSo3Px8bQPc+BjDkHQFJ9CocfpevftJwzZAVa5mEMNQOrUggmxXd15A4 SdbFHRjlvogdUMvCubOKMzmw5ilvAFDBm1wgxyWV1MprfPRvbgmATvLPyXpE8uUy bE1zGcE00ZyoDg0p3W/jYijx6oHorE+iI/f/JQuORqfLCi8boRLWp0VcZo01svnW VNfxSxnrL8B5W7IedzMEyqq4Ho/F0OqJO0hlSU9X/1vAmekuGom0Ot6JRe1u8wc= =0lNO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 15:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4118D3D.7EC9B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #598717 |
On 9/28/16, 2:53 PM, in article nshe5b$gq1$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> Agree. CNN said that Hillary won the debate. CNN was questioned >> as to how they arrived at that conclusion. A poll was done. They >> asked CNN how they conducted that poll. Oh, 500 democrats is who >> they polled and much fewer republicans. LOL!!! Yeah, that was >> really scientific of them. > > I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, > he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone > speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones > leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get > things done. Trump does neither. He lies and fails at business. > Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now found "ideas." She is horrid but that is not even close to true. > She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she was everywhere else and > needs to be kept away from the position. Trump put her against the wall and > should have gone farther but still decimated her regardless of what the > Clinton News Network and its one viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. Trump came off like the out of touch buffoon he is... not caring who he insulted. But, hey, tell him what a great job he did... it will make him lose even more. Clinton will be our next president. It is a shame, but Trump is making sure of it. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 20:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <57ec6576$0$20213$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #598717 |
On 9/28/2016 5:53 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-09-28 4:24 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 09/28/2016 01:12 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 2016-09-28 1:23 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 09/28/2016 10:22 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>>> >>>>> On 2016-09-28 11:32 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> >>>>> < snip > >>>>> >>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of >>>>>>> something. During the Cold War, they convinced Americans >>>>>>> that Soviets were a real threat and it allowed them to >>>>>>> spend inordinate amounts of money on the military. Then, >>>>>>> they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again >>>>>>> even though the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown >>>>>>> themselves to be the real issue. Having Russia as an >>>>>>> enemy is profitable because it requires real spending on >>>>>>> military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does not >>>>>>> because all it requires is for law enforcement to do >>>>>>> their job and for administrations to deport them. Why do >>>>>>> you think that Russia is the target of all hate? The >>>>>>> sniveling little Prescott Parasite once again >>>>>>> demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>>>> >>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. >>>>>> Going to war is not the answer. Trump actually wants to >>>>>> reduce our spending by cutting useless government agencies >>>>>> and programs. We don't need them. By removing our forces >>>>>> from all around the world we'd save an awful lot of >>>>>> expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire >>>>>> federal reserve system, but it is already being dumped by >>>>>> other countries anyway, so trump may as well dump them and >>>>>> save a whole lot more. I figure by repudiating the debt to >>>>>> the obscene bankers, this country would be out of debt, but >>>>>> we have to find a way to pay back to other countries that >>>>>> have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem in >>>>>> this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers >>>>>> are being kicked off their land so that our government can >>>>>> pay off that part of the debt to other countries, namely >>>>>> China, by giving our lands away to china. >>>>> >>>>> Is that what they're doing with the lands? I do know that >>>>> they're essentially confiscating them but to what end was >>>>> unknown to me. If this is true, it is despicable and even a >>>>> sniveling little turd like Snit shouldn't be supporting it. >>>> >>>> Clintons made the deal of Selling Uranium from the last Bureau >>>> of Land Management land grab. She profited heavily from the >>>> deal. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice >>>>>> warrior like snit. They've been totally brain-washed by >>>>>> the progressive movement, which in my opinion is a >>>>>> communist movement. His actions and methods speak louder >>>>>> than words ever will. >>>>> >>>>> It's an absolute shock to me that the sniveling Prescott >>>>> Parasite essentially repeats the exact arguments TV morons do >>>>> to try to convince us. You'd think that a guy who believes >>>>> himself to be smart would desire to have an opinion of his >>>>> own rather than borrow that of the black guy they hired to >>>>> replace Jon Stewart. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Propaganda really isn't a bad word, it is used to persuade >>>> people into thinking their way. A well crafted propaganda >>>> piece can go a long way. >>> >>> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a citizen. >>> For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can convince men >>> to serve their country and protect its people against a foreign >>> power or to put money in bonds. For that purpose, propaganda is >>> great. However, today's propaganda is that everything left-wing >>> is good and everything right-wing is bad. Just the other day, a >>> German magazine published an article warning readers of the >>> "danger" of right-wing families. They appear joyous and their >>> children are obedient... the monsters! >>> >> >> I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last >> spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing their >> panic. > > I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to actually > believe that article have Glasser as a last name. > >>>>> On that note, I cancelled the Comedy Network in Canada. Not >>>>> only is that replacement not funny but I was disgusted by how >>>>> liberal comedians ripped Ann Coulter apart on the latest >>>>> roast show. They targeted her when they were supposed to >>>>> target Rob Lowe and the insults were so disgusting and >>>>> insensitive that I would gladly boycott every one of the >>>>> comedians, any show they are on and any channel that carries >>>>> them. I'd rather watch PBS programming for the rest of my >>>>> life on an antenna than give them even a cent of my money. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That is standard playbook tactics of the rabid left. Trump is >>>> well aware of this, and even in the first debate he said that >>>> doesn't work anymore. >>> >>> And he's right. Anyone who watched the debate saw Trump demolish >>> Hillary for most of it. Anyone who relied on snippets or the >>> media's interpretation believes that Hillary was the clear >>> winner. It's stupidity like that which discredits the media but >>> they know that they have no credibility left (except in the eyes >>> of the sniveling Prescott Parasite) so they're going all in. 8% >>> of America believes them... 8% >>> >> >> Agree. CNN said that Hillary won the debate. CNN was questioned >> as to how they arrived at that conclusion. A poll was done. They >> asked CNN how they conducted that poll. Oh, 500 democrats is who >> they polled and much fewer republicans. LOL!!! Yeah, that was >> really scientific of them. > > I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, > he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone > speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones > leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get > things done. Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now > found "ideas." She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she > was everywhere else and needs to be kept away from the position. Trump > put her against the wall and should have gone farther but still > decimated her regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one > viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. If you think there is a choice here you are in trouble. Since you watched it all did you catch the part where BOTH candidates agreed that POTUS (soon to be one of them, they hope) should be granted authority to make secret lists of citizens whose rights are turned off. Not just right to freely travel, but right to buy firearms, right to vote, right to speak (can't have people preaching jihad) right to religion (can't let them go to mosque and get "radicalized") and so on. A person's rights turned on and off just by the opinion and say-so of the president. No "due process" and no adjudication. No defense by you allowed. So they put you on a secret list. You can't even tell if you are on it. You can't get off it. Your rights are hence-forth shit. Welcome to the NewStates of America. Did I mention that BOTH candidates see this kind of dictatorship as making America great again! WE are all doomed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 18:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D411B648.7ECD8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #598732 |
On 9/28/16, 5:50 PM, in article 57ec6576$0$20213$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com, "benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, >> he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone >> speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones >> leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get >> things done. Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now >> found "ideas." She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she >> was everywhere else and needs to be kept away from the position. Trump >> put her against the wall and should have gone farther but still >> decimated her regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one >> viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. > > If you think there is a choice here you are in trouble. Since you > watched it all did you catch the part where BOTH candidates agreed that > POTUS (soon to be one of them, they hope) should be granted authority to > make secret lists of citizens whose rights are turned off. Not just > right to freely travel, but right to buy firearms, right to vote, right > to speak (can't have people preaching jihad) right to religion (can't > let them go to mosque and get "radicalized") and so on. A person's > rights turned on and off just by the opinion and say-so of the > president. No "due process" and no adjudication. No defense by you > allowed. So they put you on a secret list. You can't even tell if you > are on it. You can't get off it. Your rights are hence-forth shit. > Welcome to the NewStates of America. I have disagreed with you on other things but here we agree... the idea there is a no-fly list which is a no-due-process list is insane. And now they want to use it for more. > Did I mention that BOTH candidates see this kind of dictatorship as > making America great again! WE are all doomed. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 19:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ed381325-2998-4093-913c-4728433ee691@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598736 |
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 6:36:57 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 9/28/16, 5:50 PM, in article > 57ec6576$0$20213$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com, "benj" > <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > > >> I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, > >> he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone > >> speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones > >> leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get > >> things done. Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now > >> found "ideas." She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she > >> was everywhere else and needs to be kept away from the position. Trump > >> put her against the wall and should have gone farther but still > >> decimated her regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one > >> viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. > > > > If you think there is a choice here you are in trouble. Since you > > watched it all did you catch the part where BOTH candidates agreed that > > POTUS (soon to be one of them, they hope) should be granted authority to > > make secret lists of citizens whose rights are turned off. Not just > > right to freely travel, but right to buy firearms, right to vote, right > > to speak (can't have people preaching jihad) right to religion (can't > > let them go to mosque and get "radicalized") and so on. A person's > > rights turned on and off just by the opinion and say-so of the > > president. No "due process" and no adjudication. No defense by you > > allowed. So they put you on a secret list. You can't even tell if you > > are on it. You can't get off it. Your rights are hence-forth shit. > > Welcome to the NewStates of America. > > I have disagreed with you on other things but here we agree... the idea > there is a no-fly list which is a no-due-process list is insane. And now > they want to use it for more. > > > Did I mention that BOTH candidates see this kind of dictatorship as > > making America great again! WE are all doomed. > > > > -- > * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> > * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> > * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> > * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> > * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> > * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> > * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> > * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> > * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c> Best bet vote Gary Johnson.I am TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 19:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nshvuh$n9i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598747 |
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: "I am TreBert" Glazier, the Face shitter & Graveyard Vandal shown by the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier> who is also <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 12:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0d91089e-6865-4648-ab3a-cbf50afa6834@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598747 |
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 7:35:47 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 6:36:57 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > > On 9/28/16, 5:50 PM, in article > > 57ec6576$0$20213$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com, "benj" > > <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > > > > >> I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, > > >> he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone > > >> speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones > > >> leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get > > >> things done. Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now > > >> found "ideas." She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she > > >> was everywhere else and needs to be kept away from the position. Trump > > >> put her against the wall and should have gone farther but still > > >> decimated her regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one > > >> viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. > > > > > > If you think there is a choice here you are in trouble. Since you > > > watched it all did you catch the part where BOTH candidates agreed that > > > POTUS (soon to be one of them, they hope) should be granted authority to > > > make secret lists of citizens whose rights are turned off. Not just > > > right to freely travel, but right to buy firearms, right to vote, right > > > to speak (can't have people preaching jihad) right to religion (can't > > > let them go to mosque and get "radicalized") and so on. A person's > > > rights turned on and off just by the opinion and say-so of the > > > president. No "due process" and no adjudication. No defense by you > > > allowed. So they put you on a secret list. You can't even tell if you > > > are on it. You can't get off it. Your rights are hence-forth shit. > > > Welcome to the NewStates of America. > > > > I have disagreed with you on other things but here we agree... the idea > > there is a no-fly list which is a no-due-process list is insane. And now > > they want to use it for more. > > > > > Did I mention that BOTH candidates see this kind of dictatorship as > > > making America great again! WE are all doomed. > > > > > > > > -- > > * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> > > * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> > > * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> > > * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> > > * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> > > * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> > > * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> > > * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> > > * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c> > > Best bet vote Gary Johnson.I am TreBert Take away Trunps $$$$$$ and you have a complete idiot.He spends millions on PR.Think Bush.Think Nixon THINK treBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nsjub2$vdm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598842 |
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote that he, Glazier is "a complete idiot."... & documents it as being the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier> who is also <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 10:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsjgun$c48$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598736 |
On 09/28/2016 07:02 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/28/16, 5:50 PM, in article > 57ec6576$0$20213$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com, "benj" > <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > >>> I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, >>> he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone >>> speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones >>> leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get >>> things done. Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now >>> found "ideas." She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she >>> was everywhere else and needs to be kept away from the position. Trump >>> put her against the wall and should have gone farther but still >>> decimated her regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one >>> viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. >> >> If you think there is a choice here you are in trouble. Since you >> watched it all did you catch the part where BOTH candidates agreed that >> POTUS (soon to be one of them, they hope) should be granted authority to >> make secret lists of citizens whose rights are turned off. Not just >> right to freely travel, but right to buy firearms, right to vote, right >> to speak (can't have people preaching jihad) right to religion (can't >> let them go to mosque and get "radicalized") and so on. A person's >> rights turned on and off just by the opinion and say-so of the >> president. No "due process" and no adjudication. No defense by you >> allowed. So they put you on a secret list. You can't even tell if you >> are on it. You can't get off it. Your rights are hence-forth shit. >> Welcome to the NewStates of America. > > I have disagreed with you on other things but here we agree... the idea > there is a no-fly list which is a no-due-process list is insane. And now > they want to use it for more. > >> Did I mention that BOTH candidates see this kind of dictatorship as >> making America great again! WE are all doomed. > Another left-wing lie. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/donald-trump-nra-guns-226852
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 10:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsjgph$c48$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598717 |
On 09/28/2016 03:53 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-09-28 4:24 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 09/28/2016 01:12 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 2016-09-28 1:23 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 09/28/2016 10:22 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>>> >>>>> On 2016-09-28 11:32 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> >>>>> < snip > >>>>> >>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of >>>>>>> something. During the Cold War, they convinced Americans >>>>>>> that Soviets were a real threat and it allowed them to >>>>>>> spend inordinate amounts of money on the military. Then, >>>>>>> they tried to convince everyone that terrorists were a >>>>>>> problem. Then, it was North Korea. Now, it's Russia again >>>>>>> even though the Muslims (not terrorists) have shown >>>>>>> themselves to be the real issue. Having Russia as an >>>>>>> enemy is profitable because it requires real spending on >>>>>>> military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does not >>>>>>> because all it requires is for law enforcement to do >>>>>>> their job and for administrations to deport them. Why do >>>>>>> you think that Russia is the target of all hate? The >>>>>>> sniveling little Prescott Parasite once again >>>>>>> demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>>>> >>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. >>>>>> Going to war is not the answer. Trump actually wants to >>>>>> reduce our spending by cutting useless government agencies >>>>>> and programs. We don't need them. By removing our forces >>>>>> from all around the world we'd save an awful lot of >>>>>> expenditures. I'm not sure if he will dump the entire >>>>>> federal reserve system, but it is already being dumped by >>>>>> other countries anyway, so trump may as well dump them and >>>>>> save a whole lot more. I figure by repudiating the debt to >>>>>> the obscene bankers, this country would be out of debt, but >>>>>> we have to find a way to pay back to other countries that >>>>>> have bought up our debt. This is where the real problem in >>>>>> this country is today... DEBT. That's why these ranchers >>>>>> are being kicked off their land so that our government can >>>>>> pay off that part of the debt to other countries, namely >>>>>> China, by giving our lands away to china. >>>>> >>>>> Is that what they're doing with the lands? I do know that >>>>> they're essentially confiscating them but to what end was >>>>> unknown to me. If this is true, it is despicable and even a >>>>> sniveling little turd like Snit shouldn't be supporting it. >>>> >>>> Clintons made the deal of Selling Uranium from the last Bureau >>>> of Land Management land grab. She profited heavily from the >>>> deal. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice >>>>>> warrior like snit. They've been totally brain-washed by >>>>>> the progressive movement, which in my opinion is a >>>>>> communist movement. His actions and methods speak louder >>>>>> than words ever will. >>>>> >>>>> It's an absolute shock to me that the sniveling Prescott >>>>> Parasite essentially repeats the exact arguments TV morons do >>>>> to try to convince us. You'd think that a guy who believes >>>>> himself to be smart would desire to have an opinion of his >>>>> own rather than borrow that of the black guy they hired to >>>>> replace Jon Stewart. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Propaganda really isn't a bad word, it is used to persuade >>>> people into thinking their way. A well crafted propaganda >>>> piece can go a long way. >>> >>> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a citizen. >>> For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can convince men >>> to serve their country and protect its people against a foreign >>> power or to put money in bonds. For that purpose, propaganda is >>> great. However, today's propaganda is that everything left-wing >>> is good and everything right-wing is bad. Just the other day, a >>> German magazine published an article warning readers of the >>> "danger" of right-wing families. They appear joyous and their >>> children are obedient... the monsters! >>> >> >> I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last >> spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing their >> panic. > > I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to actually > believe that article have Glasser as a last name. > >>>>> On that note, I cancelled the Comedy Network in Canada. Not >>>>> only is that replacement not funny but I was disgusted by how >>>>> liberal comedians ripped Ann Coulter apart on the latest >>>>> roast show. They targeted her when they were supposed to >>>>> target Rob Lowe and the insults were so disgusting and >>>>> insensitive that I would gladly boycott every one of the >>>>> comedians, any show they are on and any channel that carries >>>>> them. I'd rather watch PBS programming for the rest of my >>>>> life on an antenna than give them even a cent of my money. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That is standard playbook tactics of the rabid left. Trump is >>>> well aware of this, and even in the first debate he said that >>>> doesn't work anymore. >>> >>> And he's right. Anyone who watched the debate saw Trump demolish >>> Hillary for most of it. Anyone who relied on snippets or the >>> media's interpretation believes that Hillary was the clear >>> winner. It's stupidity like that which discredits the media but >>> they know that they have no credibility left (except in the eyes >>> of the sniveling Prescott Parasite) so they're going all in. 8% >>> of America believes them... 8% >>> >> >> Agree. CNN said that Hillary won the debate. CNN was questioned >> as to how they arrived at that conclusion. A poll was done. They >> asked CNN how they conducted that poll. Oh, 500 democrats is who >> they polled and much fewer republicans. LOL!!! Yeah, that was >> really scientific of them. > > I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's rambling, > he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need to have someone > speak eloquently and carefully to believe that they should be the ones > leading the nation; I need someone who will tell the truth and get > things done. Trump said it best: Hillary had 30 years and only now > found "ideas." She would be just as useful in the Oval Office as she > was everywhere else and needs to be kept away from the position. Trump > put her against the wall and should have gone farther but still > decimated her regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one > viewer the Prescott Parasite believe. > Trump will do that in the 3rd debate. Tactically, it is too early yet. He just did enough to scare her. The real sad part is that Wall Street, MSM, and bankers... they are all afraid of Trump and what he could do to them once in office. We need the debt burden on the populace taken away that was created by the central bank since 1915.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 13:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nsjhg0$bdr$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598795 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-09-29 12:51 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 09/28/2016 03:53 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 2016-09-28 4:24 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 09/28/2016 01:12 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> On 2016-09-28 1:23 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> On 09/28/2016 10:22 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-09-28 11:32 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> < snip > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared >>>>>>>> of something. During the Cold War, they convinced >>>>>>>> Americans that Soviets were a real threat and it >>>>>>>> allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on >>>>>>>> the military. Then, they tried to convince everyone >>>>>>>> that terrorists were a problem. Then, it was North >>>>>>>> Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though the Muslims >>>>>>>> (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>>>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable >>>>>>>> because it requires real spending on military >>>>>>>> equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does not >>>>>>>> because all it requires is for law enforcement to do >>>>>>>> their job and for administrations to deport them. Why >>>>>>>> do you think that Russia is the target of all hate? >>>>>>>> The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once again >>>>>>>> demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial >>>>>>> complex. Going to war is not the answer. Trump >>>>>>> actually wants to reduce our spending by cutting >>>>>>> useless government agencies and programs. We don't >>>>>>> need them. By removing our forces from all around the >>>>>>> world we'd save an awful lot of expenditures. I'm not >>>>>>> sure if he will dump the entire federal reserve system, >>>>>>> but it is already being dumped by other countries >>>>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole >>>>>>> lot more. I figure by repudiating the debt to the >>>>>>> obscene bankers, this country would be out of debt, >>>>>>> but we have to find a way to pay back to other >>>>>>> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where >>>>>>> the real problem in this country is today... DEBT. >>>>>>> That's why these ranchers are being kicked off their >>>>>>> land so that our government can pay off that part of >>>>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving >>>>>>> our lands away to china. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is that what they're doing with the lands? I do know >>>>>> that they're essentially confiscating them but to what >>>>>> end was unknown to me. If this is true, it is despicable >>>>>> and even a sniveling little turd like Snit shouldn't be >>>>>> supporting it. >>>>> >>>>> Clintons made the deal of Selling Uranium from the last >>>>> Bureau of Land Management land grab. She profited heavily >>>>> from the deal. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice >>>>>>> warrior like snit. They've been totally brain-washed >>>>>>> by the progressive movement, which in my opinion is a >>>>>>> communist movement. His actions and methods speak >>>>>>> louder than words ever will. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's an absolute shock to me that the sniveling Prescott >>>>>> Parasite essentially repeats the exact arguments TV >>>>>> morons do to try to convince us. You'd think that a guy >>>>>> who believes himself to be smart would desire to have an >>>>>> opinion of his own rather than borrow that of the black >>>>>> guy they hired to replace Jon Stewart. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Propaganda really isn't a bad word, it is used to persuade >>>>> people into thinking their way. A well crafted propaganda >>>>> piece can go a long way. >>>> >>>> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a >>>> citizen. For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can >>>> convince men to serve their country and protect its people >>>> against a foreign power or to put money in bonds. For that >>>> purpose, propaganda is great. However, today's propaganda is >>>> that everything left-wing is good and everything right-wing >>>> is bad. Just the other day, a German magazine published an >>>> article warning readers of the "danger" of right-wing >>>> families. They appear joyous and their children are >>>> obedient... the monsters! >>>> >>> >>> I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last >>> spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing >>> their panic. >> >> I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to >> actually believe that article have Glasser as a last name. >> >>>>>> On that note, I cancelled the Comedy Network in Canada. >>>>>> Not only is that replacement not funny but I was >>>>>> disgusted by how liberal comedians ripped Ann Coulter >>>>>> apart on the latest roast show. They targeted her when >>>>>> they were supposed to target Rob Lowe and the insults >>>>>> were so disgusting and insensitive that I would gladly >>>>>> boycott every one of the comedians, any show they are on >>>>>> and any channel that carries them. I'd rather watch PBS >>>>>> programming for the rest of my life on an antenna than >>>>>> give them even a cent of my money. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That is standard playbook tactics of the rabid left. Trump >>>>> is well aware of this, and even in the first debate he said >>>>> that doesn't work anymore. >>>> >>>> And he's right. Anyone who watched the debate saw Trump >>>> demolish Hillary for most of it. Anyone who relied on >>>> snippets or the media's interpretation believes that Hillary >>>> was the clear winner. It's stupidity like that which >>>> discredits the media but they know that they have no >>>> credibility left (except in the eyes of the sniveling >>>> Prescott Parasite) so they're going all in. 8% of America >>>> believes them... 8% >>>> >>> >>> Agree. CNN said that Hillary won the debate. CNN was >>> questioned as to how they arrived at that conclusion. A poll >>> was done. They asked CNN how they conducted that poll. Oh, >>> 500 democrats is who they polled and much fewer republicans. >>> LOL!!! Yeah, that was really scientific of them. >> >> I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's >> rambling, he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need >> to have someone speak eloquently and carefully to believe that >> they should be the ones leading the nation; I need someone who >> will tell the truth and get things done. Trump said it best: >> Hillary had 30 years and only now found "ideas." She would be >> just as useful in the Oval Office as she was everywhere else and >> needs to be kept away from the position. Trump put her against >> the wall and should have gone farther but still decimated her >> regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one viewer >> the Prescott Parasite believe. >> > > Trump will do that in the 3rd debate. Tactically, it is too early > yet. He just did enough to scare her. Exactly. She appeared to be reading something during the entire debate which - to me anyway - suggests that she knew the questions beforehand. Apparently, she got them a week in advance so it would make sense that whatever came out of her mouth seemed so well-stated. Trump has common sense and knew that the debate was going to be rigged against him and attacked very well... he just defended himself poorly from a number of attacks that should never have come. I mean why did Lester Holt point out so many things about his past yet neglect to mention much about Hillary's? Was he trying to suggest that she has a spotless record? > The real sad part is that Wall Street, MSM, and bankers... they are > all afraid of Trump and what he could do to them once in office. We > need the debt burden on the populace taken away that was created > by the central bank since 1915. I agree wholeheartedly. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7UlMAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uXkoH/R7Wbm9bms4p2rMjPFKWvVk0 9XfPViPbEbmkGU2KdC+TuZ4hd0y2F55XJ63YwTVuL2+TrntzDtavPIFLGmKd26EP xsEcJERVbRV/7H2j76vKBSLuNkpMeD5/vlOe0QrvUsVvT6b+gAb/qHboF8iOpD44 nZaC2DazmxEtd02Xjrtjt4s0Jn5RVIGlz72Y15r/Xv9YD5W/8emVt7pNcsH87Zw6 ext+aXhexBKDDRbjJvhNSxzoi8HmO3zJMcJ3kedwGqGci8DsM90g9dSPuf+iIOLx +l5JFFRKI0KJscmEmYIwUgXjPO6yDVrStUdmgcPDIvgXlcxYwpzkL8iGDbiZflA= =eUtF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 10:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D412A278.7EDE9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #598802 |
On 9/29/16, 10:03 AM, in article nsjhg0$bdr$6@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's >>> rambling, he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need >>> to have someone speak eloquently and carefully to believe that >>> they should be the ones leading the nation; I need someone who >>> will tell the truth and get things done. Trump said it best: >>> Hillary had 30 years and only now found "ideas." She would be >>> just as useful in the Oval Office as she was everywhere else and >>> needs to be kept away from the position. Trump put her against >>> the wall and should have gone farther but still decimated her >>> regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one viewer >>> the Prescott Parasite believe. >>> >> >> Trump will do that in the 3rd debate. Tactically, it is too early >> yet. He just did enough to scare her. > > Exactly. She appeared to be reading something during the entire debate > which - to me anyway - suggests that she knew the questions > beforehand. It is called being prepared. > Apparently, she got them a week in advance so it would > make sense that whatever came out of her mouth seemed so well-stated. A claim you will never support. OK. > Trump has common sense and knew that the debate was going to be rigged > against him and attacked very well... he just defended himself poorly > from a number of attacks that should never have come. He thinks asking him about his own actions is rigged against him. With that said: while they were right to ask Trump about his taxes, and Trump made an ass of himself in response, they SHOULD have asked Clinton about her speeches. Why has that topic disappeared? > I mean why did Lester Holt point out so many things about his past yet neglect > to mention much about Hillary's? Was he trying to suggest that she has a > spotless record? I do think they should have gone after her more. The speeches are just one area. Her flip flops would be another. The polls that showed election fraud would be a huge one. Those SHOULD be issues in the debates. >> The real sad part is that Wall Street, MSM, and bankers... they are >> all afraid of Trump and what he could do to them once in office. We >> need the debt burden on the populace taken away that was created >> by the central bank since 1915. > > I agree wholeheartedly. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 21:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsknuu$r61$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598802 |
On 09/29/2016 11:03 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2016-09-29 12:51 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 09/28/2016 03:53 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 2016-09-28 4:24 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 09/28/2016 01:12 PM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>>> >>>>> On 2016-09-28 1:23 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> On 09/28/2016 10:22 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2016-09-28 11:32 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < snip > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared >>>>>>>>> of something. During the Cold War, they convinced >>>>>>>>> Americans that Soviets were a real threat and it >>>>>>>>> allowed them to spend inordinate amounts of money on >>>>>>>>> the military. Then, they tried to convince everyone >>>>>>>>> that terrorists were a problem. Then, it was North >>>>>>>>> Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though the Muslims >>>>>>>>> (not terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real >>>>>>>>> issue. Having Russia as an enemy is profitable >>>>>>>>> because it requires real spending on military >>>>>>>>> equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does not >>>>>>>>> because all it requires is for law enforcement to do >>>>>>>>> their job and for administrations to deport them. Why >>>>>>>>> do you think that Russia is the target of all hate? >>>>>>>>> The sniveling little Prescott Parasite once again >>>>>>>>> demonstrates a complete lack of reason and logic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The media does to assuage the military industrial >>>>>>>> complex. Going to war is not the answer. Trump >>>>>>>> actually wants to reduce our spending by cutting >>>>>>>> useless government agencies and programs. We don't >>>>>>>> need them. By removing our forces from all around the >>>>>>>> world we'd save an awful lot of expenditures. I'm not >>>>>>>> sure if he will dump the entire federal reserve system, >>>>>>>> but it is already being dumped by other countries >>>>>>>> anyway, so trump may as well dump them and save a whole >>>>>>>> lot more. I figure by repudiating the debt to the >>>>>>>> obscene bankers, this country would be out of debt, >>>>>>>> but we have to find a way to pay back to other >>>>>>>> countries that have bought up our debt. This is where >>>>>>>> the real problem in this country is today... DEBT. >>>>>>>> That's why these ranchers are being kicked off their >>>>>>>> land so that our government can pay off that part of >>>>>>>> the debt to other countries, namely China, by giving >>>>>>>> our lands away to china. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is that what they're doing with the lands? I do know >>>>>>> that they're essentially confiscating them but to what >>>>>>> end was unknown to me. If this is true, it is despicable >>>>>>> and even a sniveling little turd like Snit shouldn't be >>>>>>> supporting it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Clintons made the deal of Selling Uranium from the last >>>>>> Bureau of Land Management land grab. She profited heavily >>>>>> from the deal. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice >>>>>>>> warrior like snit. They've been totally brain-washed >>>>>>>> by the progressive movement, which in my opinion is a >>>>>>>> communist movement. His actions and methods speak >>>>>>>> louder than words ever will. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's an absolute shock to me that the sniveling Prescott >>>>>>> Parasite essentially repeats the exact arguments TV >>>>>>> morons do to try to convince us. You'd think that a guy >>>>>>> who believes himself to be smart would desire to have an >>>>>>> opinion of his own rather than borrow that of the black >>>>>>> guy they hired to replace Jon Stewart. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Propaganda really isn't a bad word, it is used to persuade >>>>>> people into thinking their way. A well crafted propaganda >>>>>> piece can go a long way. >>>>> >>>>> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a >>>>> citizen. For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can >>>>> convince men to serve their country and protect its people >>>>> against a foreign power or to put money in bonds. For that >>>>> purpose, propaganda is great. However, today's propaganda is >>>>> that everything left-wing is good and everything right-wing >>>>> is bad. Just the other day, a German magazine published an >>>>> article warning readers of the "danger" of right-wing >>>>> families. They appear joyous and their children are >>>>> obedient... the monsters! >>>>> >>>> >>>> I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last >>>> spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing >>>> their panic. >>> >>> I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to >>> actually believe that article have Glasser as a last name. >>> >>>>>>> On that note, I cancelled the Comedy Network in Canada. >>>>>>> Not only is that replacement not funny but I was >>>>>>> disgusted by how liberal comedians ripped Ann Coulter >>>>>>> apart on the latest roast show. They targeted her when >>>>>>> they were supposed to target Rob Lowe and the insults >>>>>>> were so disgusting and insensitive that I would gladly >>>>>>> boycott every one of the comedians, any show they are on >>>>>>> and any channel that carries them. I'd rather watch PBS >>>>>>> programming for the rest of my life on an antenna than >>>>>>> give them even a cent of my money. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That is standard playbook tactics of the rabid left. Trump >>>>>> is well aware of this, and even in the first debate he said >>>>>> that doesn't work anymore. >>>>> >>>>> And he's right. Anyone who watched the debate saw Trump >>>>> demolish Hillary for most of it. Anyone who relied on >>>>> snippets or the media's interpretation believes that Hillary >>>>> was the clear winner. It's stupidity like that which >>>>> discredits the media but they know that they have no >>>>> credibility left (except in the eyes of the sniveling >>>>> Prescott Parasite) so they're going all in. 8% of America >>>>> believes them... 8% >>>>> >>>> >>>> Agree. CNN said that Hillary won the debate. CNN was >>>> questioned as to how they arrived at that conclusion. A poll >>>> was done. They asked CNN how they conducted that poll. Oh, >>>> 500 democrats is who they polled and much fewer republicans. >>>> LOL!!! Yeah, that was really scientific of them. >>> >>> I watched the whole debate and while I didn't enjoy Trump's >>> rambling, he came off as a much stronger candidate. I don't need >>> to have someone speak eloquently and carefully to believe that >>> they should be the ones leading the nation; I need someone who >>> will tell the truth and get things done. Trump said it best: >>> Hillary had 30 years and only now found "ideas." She would be >>> just as useful in the Oval Office as she was everywhere else and >>> needs to be kept away from the position. Trump put her against >>> the wall and should have gone farther but still decimated her >>> regardless of what the Clinton News Network and its one viewer >>> the Prescott Parasite believe. >>> >> >> Trump will do that in the 3rd debate. Tactically, it is too early >> yet. He just did enough to scare her. > > Exactly. She appeared to be reading something during the entire debate > which - to me anyway - suggests that she knew the questions > beforehand. Apparently, she got them a week in advance so it would > make sense that whatever came out of her mouth seemed so well-stated. > Trump has common sense and knew that the debate was going to be rigged > against him and attacked very well... he just defended himself poorly > from a number of attacks that should never have come. I mean why did > Lester Holt point out so many things about his past yet neglect to > mention much about Hillary's? Was he trying to suggest that she has a > spotless record? Yep, and she paid him well to do this. Makes ya wonder how these cretins can sleep at night. What she was reading from... a youtube video of the debate shows one of the SS taking a tablet computer from her podium after the debate. Ever watch baseball? Where there are certain hand signals that are vague and obscure? She did the same thing with Lester Holt. > >> The real sad part is that Wall Street, MSM, and bankers... they are >> all afraid of Trump and what he could do to them once in office. We >> need the debt burden on the populace taken away that was created >> by the central bank since 1915. > > I agree wholeheartedly. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 21:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4133285.7EEB6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #598898 |
On 9/29/16, 8:59 PM, in article nsknuu$r61$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> Trump will do that in the 3rd debate. Tactically, it is too early >>> yet. He just did enough to scare her. >> >> Exactly. She appeared to be reading something during the entire debate >> which - to me anyway - suggests that she knew the questions >> beforehand. Apparently, she got them a week in advance so it would >> make sense that whatever came out of her mouth seemed so well-stated. >> Trump has common sense and knew that the debate was going to be rigged >> against him and attacked very well... he just defended himself poorly >> from a number of attacks that should never have come. I mean why did >> Lester Holt point out so many things about his past yet neglect to >> mention much about Hillary's? Was he trying to suggest that she has a >> spotless record? > > Yep, and she paid him well to do this. > Makes ya wonder how these cretins can sleep at night. > > What she was reading from... a youtube video of the debate shows one of > the SS taking a tablet computer from her podium after the debate. A video you will never be able to find again. LOL! Meanwhile you claim direct video of Trump during the debates are left wing lies. It is amazing to watch. > Ever watch baseball? Where there are certain hand signals that are > vague and obscure? She did the same thing with Lester Holt. LOL! And I am sure you have videos of this, too. Too damned funny. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 11:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D412A539.7EDF3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #598795 |
On 9/29/16, 9:51 AM, in article nsjgph$c48$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>>> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a citizen. >>>> For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can convince men >>>> to serve their country and protect its people against a foreign >>>> power or to put money in bonds. For that purpose, propaganda is >>>> great. However, today's propaganda is that everything left-wing >>>> is good and everything right-wing is bad. Just the other day, a >>>> German magazine published an article warning readers of the >>>> "danger" of right-wing families. They appear joyous and their >>>> children are obedient... the monsters! >>>> >>> >>> I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last >>> spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing their >>> panic. >> >> I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to actually >> believe that article have Glasser as a last name. Again: an emotional reaction by you. Interesting. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 22:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nsko08$r61$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598817 |
On 09/29/2016 12:02 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/29/16, 9:51 AM, in article nsjgph$c48$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > >>>>> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a citizen. >>>>> For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can convince men >>>>> to serve their country and protect its people against a foreign >>>>> power or to put money in bonds. For that purpose, propaganda is >>>>> great. However, today's propaganda is that everything left-wing >>>>> is good and everything right-wing is bad. Just the other day, a >>>>> German magazine published an article warning readers of the >>>>> "danger" of right-wing families. They appear joyous and their >>>>> children are obedient... the monsters! >>>>> >>>> >>>> I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last >>>> spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing their >>>> panic. >>> >>> I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to actually >>> believe that article have Glasser as a last name. > > Again: an emotional reaction by you. Interesting. > > Thank you. It proves I'm human and not some robotic nutcase.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-29 21:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D41332C6.7EEB7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #598899 |
On 9/29/16, 9:00 PM, in article nsko08$r61$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: > On 09/29/2016 12:02 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/29/16, 9:51 AM, in article nsjgph$c48$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> Propaganda is good if it promotes a feeling of duty in a citizen. >>>>>> For instance, in time of war, decent propaganda can convince men >>>>>> to serve their country and protect its people against a foreign >>>>>> power or to put money in bonds. For that purpose, propaganda is >>>>>> great. However, today's propaganda is that everything left-wing >>>>>> is good and everything right-wing is bad. Just the other day, a >>>>>> German magazine published an article warning readers of the >>>>>> "danger" of right-wing families. They appear joyous and their >>>>>> children are obedient... the monsters! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've read about that one as well. We've entered into the last >>>>> spasms of the New World Order, and they are clearly showing their >>>>> panic. >>>> >>>> I think that the only people in the world dumb enough to actually >>>> believe that article have Glasser as a last name. >> >> Again: an emotional reaction by you. Interesting. >> > Thank you. It proves I'm human and not some robotic nutcase. One can have emotions and still use reasoning and logic... I am living proof. But you make silly claims like how REALITY is somehow biased for liberals. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 19:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cc6eee52-e2a2-497e-979d-4547557facc3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598670 |
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 10:23:39 AM UTC-7, GreyCloud wrote: > On 09/28/2016 10:22 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 2016-09-28 11:32 AM, GreyCloud wrote: > > > > < snip > > > > >>> American media always wants its citizens to be scared of > >>> something. During the Cold War, they convinced Americans that > >>> Soviets were a real threat and it allowed them to spend > >>> inordinate amounts of money on the military. Then, they tried to > >>> convince everyone that terrorists were a problem. Then, it was > >>> North Korea. Now, it's Russia again even though the Muslims (not > >>> terrorists) have shown themselves to be the real issue. Having > >>> Russia as an enemy is profitable because it requires real > >>> spending on military equipment; having Muslims as an enemy does > >>> not because all it requires is for law enforcement to do their > >>> job and for administrations to deport them. Why do you think that > >>> Russia is the target of all hate? The sniveling little Prescott > >>> Parasite once again demonstrates a complete lack of reason and > >>> logic. > >> > >> The media does to assuage the military industrial complex. Going > >> to war is not the answer. Trump actually wants to reduce our > >> spending by cutting useless government agencies and programs. We > >> don't need them. By removing our forces from all around the world > >> we'd save an awful lot of expenditures. I'm not sure if he will > >> dump the entire federal reserve system, but it is already being > >> dumped by other countries anyway, so trump may as well dump them > >> and save a whole lot more. I figure by repudiating the debt to the > >> obscene bankers, this country would be out of debt, but we have to > >> find a way to pay back to other countries that have bought up our > >> debt. This is where the real problem in this country is today... > >> DEBT. That's why these ranchers are being kicked off their land so > >> that our government can pay off that part of the debt to other > >> countries, namely China, by giving our lands away to china. > > > > Is that what they're doing with the lands? I do know that they're > > essentially confiscating them but to what end was unknown to me. If > > this is true, it is despicable and even a sniveling little turd like > > Snit shouldn't be supporting it. > > Clintons made the deal of Selling Uranium from the last Bureau of Land > Management land grab. She profited heavily from the deal. > > > > >> It is hard to reason with a seasoned social justice warrior like > >> snit. They've been totally brain-washed by the progressive > >> movement, which in my opinion is a communist movement. His actions > >> and methods speak louder than words ever will. > > > > It's an absolute shock to me that the sniveling Prescott Parasite > > essentially repeats the exact arguments TV morons do to try to > > convince us. You'd think that a guy who believes himself to be smart > > would desire to have an opinion of his own rather than borrow that of > > the black guy they hired to replace Jon Stewart. > > > > Propaganda really isn't a bad word, it is used to persuade people into > thinking their way. A well crafted propaganda piece can go a long way. > > > On that note, I cancelled the Comedy Network in Canada. Not only is > > that replacement not funny but I was disgusted by how liberal > > comedians ripped Ann Coulter apart on the latest roast show. They > > targeted her when they were supposed to target Rob Lowe and the > > insults were so disgusting and insensitive that I would gladly boycott > > every one of the comedians, any show they are on and any channel that > > carries them. I'd rather watch PBS programming for the rest of my life > > on an antenna than give them even a cent of my money. > > > > That is standard playbook tactics of the rabid left. Trump is well > aware of this, and even in the first debate he said that doesn't work > anymore. > > >>>> Just Clinton. Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to > >>>> do so. Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech > >>>> that the country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial > >>>> Military Complex, mainly the big corporations that make money > >>>> off of war. This JFK took to heart and started the space > >>>> program so that these corporations could transition to space > >>>> exploration, rather than war time production. > >>> > >>> Well said. > >>> > >> > >> He's even agreed that this was a good idea, but then reverts to > >> social engineering tactics that are just the opposite. He want's > >> division so that the progressives can win their agenda. > > > > The sniveling Prescott Parasite just wants to troll. I suggest that > > you too filter the guy so that we can finally suffocate him and get > > him to leave. > > > > I thought about it for a while. But may end up that way. He really > needs to see where we were and where we are going and if staying with > their agenda, will end up eventually end up on the short end of the stick. Trump does not pay taxes. Rick Scott stole 1.7 billion from medicare,and it was tax free.Use $200,000,000 of it to buy the election and is Florida's governor.Allstate Ins. fleed Florida after hurricane Charley so as to not pay claims. Florida governor Crist let them back 3 years latter after they gave him 100s of million. All GOP Mafia fraud and corruption.To late to fight it. GOP Mafia is the power and the glory. Hillary can't win.Reality by losing she could be saving her life. Think JFK Bobby. Obama is alive because he goose steps to the Don. Here in Calif Walter Annenberg was the Don's right hand man.Now it could be Trump?? TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-28 19:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nsi083$o0o$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #598746 |
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier "is alive because he goose steps to" Hitler as a Judeo-Nazi, shown in the link for the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier> & the lies from <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web