Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #598424 > unrolled thread

Re: Today's Presidential Debate.

Started bySnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
First post2016-09-26 22:09 -0700
Last post2016-09-28 07:50 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 137 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 22:09 -0700
    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-27 09:01 -0700
      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-27 12:08 -0500
      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 10:17 -0700
        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 12:13 -0600
          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 11:23 -0700
            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 15:07 -0600
              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 14:13 -0700
                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:51 -0600
                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:16 +0200
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:28 -0600
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 09:49 +0200
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 08:04 -0500
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 15:42 +0200
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:16 -0600
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:14 -0600
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:28 -0700
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-28 07:02 -0500
                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 17:17 -0700
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:30 -0600
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:07 -0700
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:22 -0600
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:52 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:15 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 11:13 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:11 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:45 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:40 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:21 -0700
                                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:45 -0600
                                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:55 +0000
                                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:08 -0700
                                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
                                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:23 -0700
                                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:35 -0600
                                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:38 -0700
                                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:05 +0200
                                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 17:04 -0700
                                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:04 -0700
                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:55 -0400
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:32 -0600
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 12:22 -0400
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:23 -0600
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:35 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:21 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:48 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:46 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:24 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:17 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:55 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:26 -0700
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:31 -0400
                                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:22 -0700
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:12 -0400
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:24 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:24 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:49 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:47 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:25 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 17:53 -0400
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:50 -0400
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 18:02 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:35 -0700
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:52 -0700
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 12:25 -0700
                                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 13:41 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:53 -0600
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:51 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 13:03 -0400
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 10:50 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:59 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:05 -0700
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:02 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:00 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:06 -0700
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 19:30 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:58 -0700
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:30 -0700
                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:56 -0700
                        Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 11:18 -0600
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 10:32 -0700
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 14:19 -0600
                              Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 13:47 -0700
                                Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:43 -0600
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0600
                                      Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:30 -0700
                                  Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 12:54 -0700
                                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 13:38 -0700
                          Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 15:07 -0400
                            Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 12:27 -0700
                    Re: Today's Presidential Debate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 08:45 -0700
    Re: You can't fix dead. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 15:24 -0700
      Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 16:54 -0600
        Re: You can't fix dead. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-28 01:15 +0200
          Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-27 18:32 -0600
            Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 18:04 -0700
              Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-28 09:35 -0600
              Re: You can't fix dead. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 16:49 -0400
                Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 14:01 -0700
                Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 10:57 -0600
                  Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:01 -0700
                    Re: You can't fix dead. Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:05 -0700
                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:45 -0700
                    Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:16 -0700
                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 11:55 -0700
                        Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 11:59 -0700
                          Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 17:22 -0700
                            Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:28 -0700
                              Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 18:38 -0700
                                Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 01:47 +0000
                                  Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 19:33 -0700
                                    Re: You can't fix dead. Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:52 +0000
                                      Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:07 -0700
                                    Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 20:00 -0700
                                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:52 -0700
                                        Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:56 -0700
                                  Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:04 -0700
                                  Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:16 -0600
                                    Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:31 -0700
                                      Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 14:38 -0600
                                        Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 15:39 -0700
                                Re: You can't fix dead. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:03 -0700
                        Re: You can't fix dead. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 06:43 -0500
                    Re: You can't fix dead. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-29 22:13 -0600
                      Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-29 21:35 -0700
        Re: Too much money makes you lazy, depressed. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 17:09 -0400
          Re: Ben Jacoby posts via Windows 10. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-28 20:39 -0400
        Re: You can't fix dead. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 18:51 -0700
          Re: You can't fix dead. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-28 19:03 -0700
        slower, still noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:37 -0700
          Re: slower, still Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 11:48 +0200
            Re: slower, still noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:17 -0700
      Re: You can't fix dead. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-28 07:50 -0400

Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →


#598424 — Re: Today's Presidential Debate.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-26 22:09 -0700
SubjectRe: Today's Presidential Debate.
Message-ID<D40F4D16.7E93F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
On 9/26/16, 9:53 PM, in article Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.26--9.53P.Seattle.2016,
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:

> 
> Re: Today's Presidential Debate.
> 
> Trump and Hillary are evangelists;
> and every evangelist is a liar,
> a truth twister and a fact omitter.
> 
> Hillary is better informed and more factual,
> but Trump has more energy.
> Bottom Line: Trump _might_ be the LeastWorst.
> 
I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions... a lot of
fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#598460

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-09-27 09:01 -0700
Message-ID<nse5ak$ula$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598424
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions... 
> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)
> 
hanson wrote:
This election is like all previous ones. 
The most photogenic appearing Schmuck will win.
It's all an emotional choice by/for/of the voter.
Taxes will go up, no matter who wins.
>
The only difference is, that if
- Clinton gets in, then the current set....
- Trump ins, then a new, different set....
of leeches will milk and extort the last 
red penny from its peasantry.
>
Hitlary and her regal progressives club
will continue to lie, shmooze & bamboozle 
the peasants with empty promises ....
while...
Trump will realize that doing Biz is very different
from doing politics & governing, and he will echo 
what Cal's Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger found 
out the hard way, saying:
"it is unreal and unbelievable how much effort 
it takes just to get an agreement to extend a 
freeway for a pitiful quarter of a mile".
>
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> * OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
> * Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
> * Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
> * Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
> * Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
> * OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598471

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-09-27 12:08 -0500
Message-ID<ii9lub98k4ett9gge3uiki0mqm322v7gbt@4ax.com>
In reply to#598460
hanson wrote:

>The only difference is, that if
>- Clinton gets in, then the current set....
>- Trump ins, then a new, different set....
>of leeches will milk and extort the last 
>red penny from its peasantry.

The above is a good synopsis.

-- 
"Microsoft is not a monopoly because it simply didn't force people to
buy computers with their operating system on it."  -  "Slimer"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598494

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-27 10:17 -0700
Message-ID<D40FF79D.7E9A9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598460
On 9/27/16, 9:01 AM, in article nse5ak$ula$1@dont-email.me, "hanson"
<hanson@quick.net> wrote:

> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions...
>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)
>> 
> hanson wrote:
> This election is like all previous ones.
> The most photogenic appearing Schmuck will win.
> It's all an emotional choice by/for/of the voter.
> Taxes will go up, no matter who wins.
>> 
> The only difference is, that if
> - Clinton gets in, then the current set....
> - Trump ins, then a new, different set....
> of leeches will milk and extort the last
> red penny from its peasantry.
>> 
> Hitlary and her regal progressives club
> will continue to lie, shmooze & bamboozle
> the peasants with empty promises ....
> while...
> Trump will realize that doing Biz is very different
> from doing politics & governing, and he will echo
> what Cal's Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger found
> out the hard way, saying:
> "it is unreal and unbelievable how much effort
> it takes just to get an agreement to extend a
> freeway for a pitiful quarter of a mile".

This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least liked,
least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.

But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then the
bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598498

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-27 12:13 -0600
Message-ID<nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598494
On 09/27/2016 11:17 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/27/16, 9:01 AM, in article nse5ak$ula$1@dont-email.me, "hanson"
> <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
>
>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> I was with a group with a lot of side debates and discussions...
>>> a lot of fun but will watch it again to focus on it better. :)
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> This election is like all previous ones.
>> The most photogenic appearing Schmuck will win.
>> It's all an emotional choice by/for/of the voter.
>> Taxes will go up, no matter who wins.
>>>
>> The only difference is, that if
>> - Clinton gets in, then the current set....
>> - Trump ins, then a new, different set....
>> of leeches will milk and extort the last
>> red penny from its peasantry.
>>>
>> Hitlary and her regal progressives club
>> will continue to lie, shmooze & bamboozle
>> the peasants with empty promises ....
>> while...
>> Trump will realize that doing Biz is very different
>> from doing politics & governing, and he will echo
>> what Cal's Gov Arnold Schwarzenegger found
>> out the hard way, saying:
>> "it is unreal and unbelievable how much effort
>> it takes just to get an agreement to extend a
>> freeway for a pitiful quarter of a mile".
>
> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least liked,
> least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>
> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then the
> bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
> about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.
>
>
And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598503

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-27 11:23 -0700
Message-ID<D410071D.7E9C8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598498
On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least liked,
>> least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>> 
>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then the
>> bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
>> about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.
>> 
>> 
> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.

Sigh. By all means show that.

Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598535

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-27 15:07 -0600
Message-ID<nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598503
On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>
>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least liked,
>>> least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>
>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then the
>>> bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
>>> about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.
>>>
>>>
>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>
> Sigh. By all means show that.
>
> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>
>
Try doing a search in YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs

And many others like it on Youtube as well.

If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your affairs 
in order as you'll get drafted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598540

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-27 14:13 -0700
Message-ID<D4102F0A.7EA45%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598535
On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least liked,
>>>> least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>> 
>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then the
>>>> bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
>>>> about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>> 
>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>> 
>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>> 
>> 
> Try doing a search in YouTube.
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs

So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?

> And many others like it on Youtube as well.

Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to back
him!

Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?

> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your affairs
> in order as you'll get drafted.

Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598554

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-27 16:51 -0600
Message-ID<nset5b$p9s$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598540
On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least liked,
>>>>> least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then the
>>>>> bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
>>>>> about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>
>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>
>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>
>>>
>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>
> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>
>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>
> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to back
> him!
>

What have you got against putin?
All he wanted to do was do business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on 
his border.  Russia doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only 
have two.  So who is surrounding who?
At least Trump can do business and get a better deal than Hillary ever will.

> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>

During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the early 
90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest manner in 
what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB back up.

>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your affairs
>> in order as you'll get drafted.
>
> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>

Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do so.
Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that the 
country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military Complex, 
mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these 
corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war time 
production.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598565

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2016-09-28 01:16 +0200
Message-ID<nseujr$st4$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598554
GreyCloud wrote:

> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me,
>>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least
>>>>>> liked, least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in
>>>>>> then the bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more...
>>>>>> but that is about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from
>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>>
>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>>
>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>>
>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>>
>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>>
>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to back
>> him!
>>
> 
> What have you got against putin?


Well, he is a war criminal. He lies like a Snit

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598577

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-27 18:28 -0600
Message-ID<nsf2qk$7ue$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598565
On 09/27/2016 05:16 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> GreyCloud wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me,
>>>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least
>>>>>>> liked, least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in
>>>>>>> then the bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more...
>>>>>>> but that is about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from
>>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>>>
>>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>>>
>>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>>>
>>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to back
>>> him!
>>>
>>
>> What have you got against putin?
>
>
> Well, he is a war criminal. He lies like a Snit
>
In what sense?  As an earlier KGB head?
I've read all of the stuff for quite some time, and if you are referring 
to Georgia or the Ukraine... that was actually caused by the CIA and 
Hillary.
All putin did was to protect his own citizens interest in this regards.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598629

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2016-09-28 09:49 +0200
Message-ID<nsfsls$v6n$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598577
GreyCloud wrote:

> On 09/27/2016 05:16 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me,
>>>>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least
>>>>>>>> liked, least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in
>>>>>>>> then the bigots will have justification to push their bigotry
>>>>>>>> more... but that is about it. In four years we will have a
>>>>>>>> back-lash from either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>>>>
>>>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>>>>
>>>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>>>>
>>>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to
>>>> back him!
>>>>
>>>
>>> What have you got against putin?
>>
>>
>> Well, he is a war criminal. He lies like a Snit
>>
> In what sense?  As an earlier KGB head?
> I've read all of the stuff for quite some time, and if you are referring
> to Georgia or the Ukraine... that was actually caused by the CIA and
> Hillary.
> All putin did was to protect his own citizens interest in this regards.

He broke the Budapest treaty. Russia signed it, the Ukraine handed over all 
nuclear weapons and got granted that their borders are respected and not to 
be touched.
What happened was annexion of the Krim, the shotdown of a civilian airplane 
by russian troups and a war on the soil of the Ukraine. What do you think 
those russian soldiers captured in the Donbass region were doing there?

Russias atttacks on Georgia were made under the same pretext as the ones on 
the Ukraine, he wanted to "protect russian people in those countries".
Bullshit. Georgia wanted to be part of the EU. *Thats* what Putin wanted to 
hinder, just as with the Ukraine

His "interests" are bullshit, he has to respect other countries borders. Why 
do you think are the eastern europe states so keen to be part of NATO?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598636

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-09-28 08:04 -0500
Message-ID<lkfnub1jofdb045a798b4kvoe20irb61vn@4ax.com>
In reply to#598629
Peter Köhlmann wrote:

>His "interests" are bullshit, he has to respect other countries borders. Why 
>do you think are the eastern europe states so keen to be part of NATO?

I must say, though, that the talk of Ukraine becoming part of NATO
went too far.  I can understand the Russians thinking "Really?  I
don't think so."

-- 
"I will never again touch GNU/Linux or anything running the Linux
kernel."  -  "Slimer"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598639

FromPeter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Date2016-09-28 15:42 +0200
Message-ID<nsghcl$3cg$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598636
chrisv wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> 
>>His "interests" are bullshit, he has to respect other countries borders.
>>Why do you think are the eastern europe states so keen to be part of NATO?
> 
> I must say, though, that the talk of Ukraine becoming part of NATO
> went too far.  I can understand the Russians thinking "Really?  I
> don't think so."
> 

It is simply not up to them. It is *not* their decision. It is a foreign 
country, and they have no say in that countries memberships to treaties. And 
no, it wasn't about becoming a NATO member. Ukraine wanted that in the long 
run, but NATO had already made clear that for the next future this will not 
be done.
Ukraine wanted to get into the EU, away from the russian market. And that 
was already too much for that dictator Putin

Besides, giving promises of security of the ukrainian borders in exchange 
for the nuclear weapons, only to break all those promises is showing that 
Putin can't be trusted at all.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598647

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-28 09:16 -0600
Message-ID<nsgmrt$n3u$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598639
On 09/28/2016 07:42 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> His "interests" are bullshit, he has to respect other countries borders.
>>> Why do you think are the eastern europe states so keen to be part of NATO?
>>
>> I must say, though, that the talk of Ukraine becoming part of NATO
>> went too far.  I can understand the Russians thinking "Really?  I
>> don't think so."
>>
>
> It is simply not up to them. It is *not* their decision. It is a foreign
> country, and they have no say in that countries memberships to treaties. And
> no, it wasn't about becoming a NATO member. Ukraine wanted that in the long
> run, but NATO had already made clear that for the next future this will not
> be done.
> Ukraine wanted to get into the EU, away from the russian market. And that
> was already too much for that dictator Putin
>
> Besides, giving promises of security of the ukrainian borders in exchange
> for the nuclear weapons, only to break all those promises is showing that
> Putin can't be trusted at all.
>

http://www.globalresearch.ca/washington-was-behind-ukraine-coup-detat-in-response-to-russias-stance-on-syria-stratfor/5421026

The United States plotted the coup which took place in Ukraine in 
February 2014 in response to Russia’s policy in Syria, says George 
Friedman, the founder and CEO of Stratfor, known as “Shadow CIA”.

The United States is behind the February coup in Kiev, which came in 
response to Russia’s stance on Syria, said George Friedman, the founder 
and CEO of Stratfor, a global intelligence company.

Russia has repeatedly said that the coup in Kiev was organized by the 
US, Friedman told Kommersant newspaper. Indeed, it was the most overt 
coup in history, the political analyst stressed.

The United States decided to act following Russia’s successes in the 
Middle East, a key region for the US. Americans saw that Russians could 
influence what was happening in the Middle East, Friedman said. Russians 
are one of the many challenges in the region that the US faces, he 
stated. The US thought Russia’s activities were an attempt to harm 
Washington, the political analyst told the newspaper, adding that events 
in Ukraine should be viewed in this context.

Russians seem to have underestimated how seriously the US would react to 
Moscow’s activities in the region and that they would easily respond, 
Friedman said. The US understood that the thing Russia wants the least 
is instability in Ukraine, he added.

Meeting of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and his Mauritanian 
counterpart Ahmed Ould Teguedi
The head of Stratfor, also known as “The Shadow CIA,” insisted that 
Russia’s involvement in Syria was not the only reason for the Ukrainian 
crisis. However, many in Washington started to perceive Russia as a 
problem, the expert told the newspaper, adding that at that time the US 
decided to divert Russia’s attention away from the Middle East.

Syria has been in a civil war since March 2011. Over 100,000 people have 
died as a result of the armed conflict. Russia repeatedly stated that 
the election of Syria’s president Bashar Assad was legitimate, and that 
the people of Syria should control their future. From the beginning of 
the war the US supported the opposition and stated that the conflict 
would not be over with Assad in power.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598646

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-28 09:14 -0600
Message-ID<nsgmoo$n3u$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598629
On 09/28/2016 01:49 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> GreyCloud wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2016 05:16 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me,
>>>>>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least
>>>>>>>>> liked, least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in
>>>>>>>>> then the bigots will have justification to push their bigotry
>>>>>>>>> more... but that is about it. In four years we will have a
>>>>>>>>> back-lash from either.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>>>>>
>>>>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>>>>>
>>>>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to
>>>>> back him!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What have you got against putin?
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, he is a war criminal. He lies like a Snit
>>>
>> In what sense?  As an earlier KGB head?
>> I've read all of the stuff for quite some time, and if you are referring
>> to Georgia or the Ukraine... that was actually caused by the CIA and
>> Hillary.
>> All putin did was to protect his own citizens interest in this regards.
>
> He broke the Budapest treaty. Russia signed it, the Ukraine handed over all
> nuclear weapons and got granted that their borders are respected and not to
> be touched.
> What happened was annexion of the Krim, the shotdown of a civilian airplane
> by russian troups and a war on the soil of the Ukraine. What do you think
> those russian soldiers captured in the Donbass region were doing there?
>
> Russias atttacks on Georgia were made under the same pretext as the ones on
> the Ukraine, he wanted to "protect russian people in those countries".
> Bullshit. Georgia wanted to be part of the EU. *Thats* what Putin wanted to
> hinder, just as with the Ukraine
>
> His "interests" are bullshit, he has to respect other countries borders. Why
> do you think are the eastern europe states so keen to be part of NATO?
>

This is what YOUR news services have told you, but it is ass-backwards.
That interim gov. was set up by our State Dept., which obviously was a 
coup d'etat.  So putin had the area in Crimea vote on whether to stay 
with Russia or belong with the new interim government.  They voted to 
stay with Russia, as they always were Russian for a very long time and 
speak Russian.  Is it any wonder, after a coup d'etat, that Putin did 
what he did.  The blood is on U.S. hands, not putins.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598579

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-27 17:28 -0700
Message-ID<D4105CC2.7EA92%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598565
On 9/27/16, 4:16 PM, in article nseujr$st4$3@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

> GreyCloud wrote:
> 
>> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me,
>>>>> "GreyCloud" <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least
>>>>>>> liked, least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in
>>>>>>> then the bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more...
>>>>>>> but that is about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from
>>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>>> 
>>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>>> 
>>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>>> 
>>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to back
>>> him!
>>> 
>> 
>> What have you got against putin?
> 
> 
> Well, he is a war criminal. He lies like a Snit
> 

I am NOT your Captain Kirk! <https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598635

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-09-28 07:02 -0500
Message-ID<3rbnubtuao4nu1khq1kg34fa24cjhl8q1s@4ax.com>
In reply to#598565
> some piece of shit wrote:
>> 
>> What have you got against putin?

(rolling eyes)  *Proud* of your ignorance, are you, "GreyCloud"?  Or
maybe you admire murderous tyrants?  You know that he restored state
control over the media, right?  Not to mention the things that Peter
said.

It's too bad for you that he already has a full-time job, or you could
have your dream ticket of Trump-Putin.

-- 
"[FOSS] is anti-capitalism, communist."  -  some piece of shit that
calls itself "GreyCloud"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598576

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-09-27 17:17 -0700
Message-ID<D4105A31.7EA8D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#598554
On 9/27/16, 3:51 PM, in article nset5b$p9s$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
<Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:

> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least
>>>>>> liked,
>>>>>> least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
>>>>>> about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>> 
>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>> 
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>> 
>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>> 
>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>> 
>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to back
>> him!
> 
> What have you got against putin?
> All he wanted to do was do business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on
> his border.  Russia doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only
> have two.  So who is surrounding who?
> At least Trump can do business and get a better deal than Hillary ever will.

We have been pretty much fighting proxy wars with them for some time.

>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
> 
> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the early
> 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest manner in
> what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB back up.

He who?

>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your affairs
>>> in order as you'll get drafted.
>> 
>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>
> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do so.

Belittle him in any way and he will want to prove he is a man.

> Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that the
> country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military Complex,
> mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war time
> production.
> 
> 



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598582

FromGreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com>
Date2016-09-27 18:30 -0600
Message-ID<nsf2v0$7ue$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598576
On 09/27/2016 06:17 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 9/27/16, 3:51 PM, in article nset5b$p9s$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2016 03:13 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 9/27/16, 2:07 PM, in article nsen2o$1i6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/27/2016 12:23 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 9/27/16, 11:13 AM, in article nsecr9$p2v$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>>>>> <Cumulus@mist.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> This election is odd in that both parties have selected their least
>>>>>>> liked,
>>>>>>> least trusted candidates. It is rather insane.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I do agree it matters little who is elected. If Trump gets in then
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> bigots will have justification to push their bigotry more... but that is
>>>>>>> about it. In four years we will have a back-lash from either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And Putin promised that if its Hillary, then it will be WWIII.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sigh. By all means show that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me guess: no video but Alex Jones heard him personally.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Try doing a search in YouTube.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ythLYtbEs
>>>
>>> So no actual quote or video just a blogger similar to Alex Jones?
>>>
>>>> And many others like it on Youtube as well.
>>>
>>> Putin does seem to prefer Trump... which is not exactly a reason to back
>>> him!
>>
>> What have you got against putin?
>> All he wanted to do was do business.  Yet Obama has a lot of hardware on
>> his border.  Russia doesn't have a base in our hemisphere.  They only
>> have two.  So who is surrounding who?
>> At least Trump can do business and get a better deal than Hillary ever will.
>
> We have been pretty much fighting proxy wars with them for some time.

Agree, and all of it was designed to start a very chaotic war, which 
later on would be noted as WWIII.  WWIII doesn't have to be nuclear, as 
all foreign leaders know that that is a no-win situation.  Everybody loses.

>
>>> Hey, were you not against those who are supported by Soviets?
>>
>> During that era, yes.  But the Soviets no longer exist.  Since the early
>> 90s, the KGB was dismantled.  Now, because of the dishonest manner in
>> what this country is doing, he now has started the KGB back up.
>
> He who?

Putin, of course.

>
>>>> If you are in your early 30s and WWIII starts, better get your affairs
>>>> in order as you'll get drafted.
>>>
>>> Both Clinton and Trump will lead to war.
>>
>> Just Clinton.  Trump won't do it as it isn't in his nature to do so.
>
> Belittle him in any way and he will want to prove he is a man.
>

How so?  Far as I can see and tell, he doesn't have to prove that point.

>> Remember that EisenHower said during his farewell speech that the
>> country needs to be aware and beware of the Industrial Military Complex,
>> mainly the big corporations that make money off of war.
>> This JFK took to heart and started the space program so that these
>> corporations could transition to space exploration, rather than war time
>> production.
>>
>>
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 7  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web