Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #605793 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-11-21 17:08 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-11-30 06:05 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 138 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 17:08 -0500
REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:33 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:18 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:47 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:56 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:55 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:39 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:05 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:07 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:11 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:15 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 12:31 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:52 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:23 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:49 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:46 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 20:09 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 07:35 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:11 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 16:15 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 19:37 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 09:04 -0600
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:50 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:55 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:53 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:56 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 08:11 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:33 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 03:59 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 10:49 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 11:50 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:18 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:54 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:07 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:10 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:14 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:27 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:11 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:12 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:19 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 18:13 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 09:48 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:40 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:50 +0000
REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 15:12 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 19:14 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 18:50 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:31 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-22 23:06 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:29 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:50 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:22 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:03 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:39 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:03 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:53 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:07 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:29 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:41 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:38 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:40 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:16 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:34 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:58 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 17:12 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:27 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:52 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:25 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:06 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:42 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:06 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:55 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:09 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:30 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:42 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:40 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:43 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:18 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:35 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:59 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:35 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 18:20 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:59 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:09 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:44 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:16 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:58 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:14 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:32 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:52 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:41 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:45 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:26 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:43 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:45 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:02 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:41 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:10 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:46 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:17 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:59 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:15 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:33 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:54 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:46 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:31 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:44 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:04 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 07:59 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:13 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:20 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 09:46 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 08:57 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 10:38 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:16 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:47 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:43 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:37 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:31 -0800
premote fiewing **** noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 19:59 -0800
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:12 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:47 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:19 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:05 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:17 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:34 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:55 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:44 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:49 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:32 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:49 +0000
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:05 +0000
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 01:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <80n1hd-s9f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607141 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 6:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/28/2016 8:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2016 8:12 PM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remote viewing has nothing to do with ghosts but you are too ignorant >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and uneducated to know that. No offense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You seem upset BJ. How about a fist bump to calm you down? Maybe reduce your froth level a bit? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which do you believe in more... Ghosts or remote viewing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legit question? Right right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There have been "projects" on lots of things that turned out groundless. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And there have been "projects" on lots of things that proved very >>>>>>>>>>> encouraging and suddenly became secret and classified. Do you have proof >>>>>>>>>>> that a current classified version does not exist? OF course you don't. >>>>>>>>>>> All you have is HVAC and his kook fantasies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Consipiracy beset kook. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There have been zero "projects" on anything of a psychic nature that >>>>>>>>>> have come up with anything other than null results. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok. look it's another idiot HVAC student. It's the old I know it all and >>>>>>>>> if I say something that is proof it's true. What ultimate drool. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So what research into psychic phenomenon has produced positive results >>>>>>>> kook? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nothing here anymore than from HVAC. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IF you knew how to read I'd suggest you read the many books on the >>>>>>>>> remote viewing project. Oh wait. That requires more education than you >>>>>>>>> can muster. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure, lots of books on remote viewing projects, some real and some kook, >>>>>>>> but no remote viewing project with positive results kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Scientists who did the project say otherwise. Obviously you would never >>>>>>> have credentials to be picked, yet you somehow know it all. Must be >>>>>>> using your superpowers again/ >>>>>> >>>>>> So where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? >>>>> >>>>> So you don't trust your government? My My, that isn't very >>>>> establishment. Even HVAC says governments and politicians never lie. >>>> >>>> I did not say anything about the government kook. >>>> >>>> I said where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? >>>> >>> Check that computer in front of you. It can find all manner of data. I'm >>> sure you agree that all the scientists at SRI are all kooks and nutjobs >>> like you. Are you really that ignorant or just a shill like HVAC? >> >> I there were peer reviewed published positive results of remote viewing >> there would be universities all over the world studying it but there >> are not kook. >> >> > Right SRI is run by kooks and has nutjobs there pretending to do > science. (Um, what does "S" standfor. Idiot) Changing the subject again kook? Where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e3cfb$0$10193$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607161 |
On 11/29/2016 8:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/29/2016 6:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2016 8:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2016 8:12 PM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remote viewing has nothing to do with ghosts but you are too ignorant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and uneducated to know that. No offense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You seem upset BJ. How about a fist bump to calm you down? Maybe reduce your froth level a bit? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which do you believe in more... Ghosts or remote viewing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legit question? Right right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been "projects" on lots of things that turned out groundless. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And there have been "projects" on lots of things that proved very >>>>>>>>>>>> encouraging and suddenly became secret and classified. Do you have proof >>>>>>>>>>>> that a current classified version does not exist? OF course you don't. >>>>>>>>>>>> All you have is HVAC and his kook fantasies. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Consipiracy beset kook. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There have been zero "projects" on anything of a psychic nature that >>>>>>>>>>> have come up with anything other than null results. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ok. look it's another idiot HVAC student. It's the old I know it all and >>>>>>>>>> if I say something that is proof it's true. What ultimate drool. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So what research into psychic phenomenon has produced positive results >>>>>>>>> kook? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nothing here anymore than from HVAC. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> IF you knew how to read I'd suggest you read the many books on the >>>>>>>>>> remote viewing project. Oh wait. That requires more education than you >>>>>>>>>> can muster. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure, lots of books on remote viewing projects, some real and some kook, >>>>>>>>> but no remote viewing project with positive results kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Scientists who did the project say otherwise. Obviously you would never >>>>>>>> have credentials to be picked, yet you somehow know it all. Must be >>>>>>>> using your superpowers again/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? >>>>>> >>>>>> So you don't trust your government? My My, that isn't very >>>>>> establishment. Even HVAC says governments and politicians never lie. >>>>> >>>>> I did not say anything about the government kook. >>>>> >>>>> I said where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? >>>>> >>>> Check that computer in front of you. It can find all manner of data. I'm >>>> sure you agree that all the scientists at SRI are all kooks and nutjobs >>>> like you. Are you really that ignorant or just a shill like HVAC? >>> >>> I there were peer reviewed published positive results of remote viewing >>> there would be universities all over the world studying it but there >>> are not kook. >>> >>> >> Right SRI is run by kooks and has nutjobs there pretending to do >> science. (Um, what does "S" standfor. Idiot) > > Changing the subject again kook? > > Where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? > > No answer. STalker.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 05:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9e62hd-9sg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607186 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 8:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/29/2016 6:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2016 8:12 PM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remote viewing has nothing to do with ghosts but you are too ignorant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and uneducated to know that. No offense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You seem upset BJ. How about a fist bump to calm you down? Maybe reduce your froth level a bit? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which do you believe in more... Ghosts or remote viewing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legit question? Right right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been "projects" on lots of things that turned out groundless. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And there have been "projects" on lots of things that proved very >>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraging and suddenly became secret and classified. Do you have proof >>>>>>>>>>>>> that a current classified version does not exist? OF course you don't. >>>>>>>>>>>>> All you have is HVAC and his kook fantasies. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Consipiracy beset kook. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There have been zero "projects" on anything of a psychic nature that >>>>>>>>>>>> have come up with anything other than null results. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok. look it's another idiot HVAC student. It's the old I know it all and >>>>>>>>>>> if I say something that is proof it's true. What ultimate drool. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So what research into psychic phenomenon has produced positive results >>>>>>>>>> kook? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing here anymore than from HVAC. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> IF you knew how to read I'd suggest you read the many books on the >>>>>>>>>>> remote viewing project. Oh wait. That requires more education than you >>>>>>>>>>> can muster. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sure, lots of books on remote viewing projects, some real and some kook, >>>>>>>>>> but no remote viewing project with positive results kook. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Scientists who did the project say otherwise. Obviously you would never >>>>>>>>> have credentials to be picked, yet you somehow know it all. Must be >>>>>>>>> using your superpowers again/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you don't trust your government? My My, that isn't very >>>>>>> establishment. Even HVAC says governments and politicians never lie. >>>>>> >>>>>> I did not say anything about the government kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> I said where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? >>>>>> >>>>> Check that computer in front of you. It can find all manner of data. I'm >>>>> sure you agree that all the scientists at SRI are all kooks and nutjobs >>>>> like you. Are you really that ignorant or just a shill like HVAC? >>>> >>>> I there were peer reviewed published positive results of remote viewing >>>> there would be universities all over the world studying it but there >>>> are not kook. >>>> >>>> >>> Right SRI is run by kooks and has nutjobs there pretending to do >>> science. (Um, what does "S" standfor. Idiot) >> >> Changing the subject again kook? >> >> Where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? >> >> > No answer. STalker. You never seem to have an answer kook? Where are those peer reviewed published positive results kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 04:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b55bbf10-d5e3-48b9-8ed5-095e1bd31c37@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606047 |
benj - show quoted text - Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. ------------ There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. It's as simple as that. Trust me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 18:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k83hgd-3vh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606089 |
HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: > benj > - show quoted text - > Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth > is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation > (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists > and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. > ------------ > > There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. > > It's as simple as that. Trust me. He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 18:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58362d86$0$34559$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606164 |
On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >> benj >> - show quoted text - >> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >> ------------ >> >> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >> >> It's as simple as that. Trust me. > > He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as you think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-24 01:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <47rhgd-mik.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606282 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>> benj >>> - show quoted text - >>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>> ------------ >>> >>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>> >>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >> >> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. > > Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, > and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. > Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as > you think. Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the other silly nonsense you believe in kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 19:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583a2c7a$0$12009$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606301 |
On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> benj >>>> - show quoted text - >>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>> ------------ >>>> >>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>> >>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>> >>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >> >> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. > > You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. > >> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >> you think. > > Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine > exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the > other silly nonsense you believe in kook? Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. Loon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 02:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o8spgd-8gh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606595 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> benj >>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>> ------------ >>>>> >>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>> >>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>> >>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>> >>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >> >> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >> >>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>> you think. >> >> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? > > Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. > You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP > patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of > reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold > assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. There is no "HAARP patent". There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has nothing to do with HAARP. Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. Kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 21:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583a4be4$0$55957$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606618 |
On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> benj >>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>> ------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>> >>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>> >>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>> >>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>> >>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>> you think. >>> >>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >> >> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. > > There is no "HAARP patent". you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up again. > There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has > nothing to do with HAARP. You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. > Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other > kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. Just make it all up. > Kook. Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? I'll bet it's more than HVAC.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 04:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q53qgd-j5i.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606627 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> benj >>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>> >>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>> >>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>> >>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>> >>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>> you think. >>>> >>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>> >>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >> >> There is no "HAARP patent". > > you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up > again. Nice try to change the subject kook. The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the patent. >> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >> nothing to do with HAARP. > > You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent > for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. > > Just make it all up. Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >> Kook. > > Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 16:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583ca25d$0$51784$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606650 |
On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>> >>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>> >>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>> >>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>> you think. >>>>> >>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>> >>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>> >>> There is no "HAARP patent". >> >> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >> again. > > Nice try to change the subject kook. > > The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: > > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 > > You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the > patent. > >>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>> nothing to do with HAARP. >> >> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. > > You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. > >>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >> >> Just make it all up. > > Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. > >>> Kook. >> >> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? > > Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for some assistance thinking.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 01:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk3vgd-o95.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606896 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>>> you think. >>>>>> >>>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>>> >>>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>>> >>>> There is no "HAARP patent". >>> >>> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >>> again. >> >> Nice try to change the subject kook. >> >> The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: >> >> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >> >> You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the >> patent. >> >>>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>>> nothing to do with HAARP. >>> >>> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >>> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. >> >> You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >> >>>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >>> >>> Just make it all up. >> >> Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >> >>>> Kook. >>> >>> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? >> >> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. > > So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent > applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook > devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for > some assistance thinking. While the patent office will usually reject perpetual motion patents, they will reject little else out of hand. Here's a perpetual motion machine patented in 2012 that calls itself something else: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8112992.pdf Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real and the patent office actually tests the claims of a patent to ensure they are true. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 17:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e0430$0$55876$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606980 |
On 11/28/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>>>> you think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>>>> >>>>> There is no "HAARP patent". >>>> >>>> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >>>> again. >>> >>> Nice try to change the subject kook. >>> >>> The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: >>> >>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >>> >>> You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the >>> patent. >>> >>>>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>>>> nothing to do with HAARP. >>>> >>>> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >>>> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. >>> >>> You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >>> >>>>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>>>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >>>> >>>> Just make it all up. >>> >>> Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >>> >>>>> Kook. >>>> >>>> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? >>> >>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. >> >> So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent >> applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook >> devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for >> some assistance thinking. > > While the patent office will usually reject perpetual motion patents, they > will reject little else out of hand. > > Here's a perpetual motion machine patented in 2012 that calls itself > something else: > > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8112992.pdf > > Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real > and the patent office actually tests the claims of a patent to ensure > they are true. So patent your perpetual motion machine and see how far your application gets. Nutjob.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1hg1hd-ile.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607088 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/28/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>>>>> you think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>>>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>>>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>>>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>>>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no "HAARP patent". >>>>> >>>>> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >>>>> again. >>>> >>>> Nice try to change the subject kook. >>>> >>>> The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: >>>> >>>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >>>> >>>> You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the >>>> patent. >>>> >>>>>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>>>>> nothing to do with HAARP. >>>>> >>>>> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >>>>> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. >>>> >>>> You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >>>> >>>>>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>>>>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >>>>> >>>>> Just make it all up. >>>> >>>> Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >>>> >>>>>> Kook. >>>>> >>>>> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? >>>> >>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. >>> >>> So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent >>> applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook >>> devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for >>> some assistance thinking. >> >> While the patent office will usually reject perpetual motion patents, they >> will reject little else out of hand. >> >> Here's a perpetual motion machine patented in 2012 that calls itself >> something else: >> >> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8112992.pdf >> >> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real >> and the patent office actually tests the claims of a patent to ensure >> they are true. > > So patent your perpetual motion machine and see how far your application > gets. Nutjob. The kook changes the arguement as it has backed itself into a corner. The bottom line is the so called "HAARP patent" has nothing to do with the HAARP project or anyone associated with it kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 19:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e1cb2$0$25214$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607125 |
On 11/29/2016 6:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/28/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>>>>>> you think. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>>>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>>>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>>>>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>>>>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>>>>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>>>>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no "HAARP patent". >>>>>> >>>>>> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >>>>>> again. >>>>> >>>>> Nice try to change the subject kook. >>>>> >>>>> The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: >>>>> >>>>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >>>>> >>>>> You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the >>>>> patent. >>>>> >>>>>>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>>>>>> nothing to do with HAARP. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >>>>>> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. >>>>> >>>>> You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>>>>>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just make it all up. >>>>> >>>>> Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >>>>> >>>>>>> Kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? >>>>> >>>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. >>>> >>>> So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent >>>> applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook >>>> devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for >>>> some assistance thinking. >>> >>> While the patent office will usually reject perpetual motion patents, they >>> will reject little else out of hand. >>> >>> Here's a perpetual motion machine patented in 2012 that calls itself >>> something else: >>> >>> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8112992.pdf >>> >>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real >>> and the patent office actually tests the claims of a patent to ensure >>> they are true. >> >> So patent your perpetual motion machine and see how far your application >> gets. Nutjob. > > The kook changes the arguement as it has backed itself into a corner. > > The bottom line is the so called "HAARP patent" has nothing to do with > the HAARP project or anyone associated with it kook. And your opinon is of course proof. You can't find any papers (more likely won't) and yet you claim to have read the HAARP patent in detail? YOu are a total waste of time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 01:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ien1hd-s9f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607142 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 6:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/28/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>>>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>>>>>>> you think. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>>>>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>>>>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>>>>>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>>>>>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>>>>>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>>>>>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is no "HAARP patent". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >>>>>>> again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice try to change the subject kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >>>>>> >>>>>> You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the >>>>>> patent. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>>>>>>> nothing to do with HAARP. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >>>>>>> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. >>>>>> >>>>>> You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>>>>>>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just make it all up. >>>>>> >>>>>> Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. >>>>> >>>>> So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent >>>>> applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook >>>>> devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for >>>>> some assistance thinking. >>>> >>>> While the patent office will usually reject perpetual motion patents, they >>>> will reject little else out of hand. >>>> >>>> Here's a perpetual motion machine patented in 2012 that calls itself >>>> something else: >>>> >>>> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8112992.pdf >>>> >>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real >>>> and the patent office actually tests the claims of a patent to ensure >>>> they are true. >>> >>> So patent your perpetual motion machine and see how far your application >>> gets. Nutjob. >> >> The kook changes the arguement as it has backed itself into a corner. >> >> The bottom line is the so called "HAARP patent" has nothing to do with >> the HAARP project or anyone associated with it kook. > > And your opinon is of course proof. You can't find any papers (more > likely won't) and yet you claim to have read the HAARP patent in detail? Yes, I have read the so called "HAARP patent" in detail and it is not associated in any way with the actual HAARP project or anyone that is part of the actual HAARP project kook. Here is is again kook: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 Point to anyone or anything from the actual HAARP project or any mention of HAARP in this kook patent. It is true the author claimed HAARP infringed his patents, but like you, he was laughed at kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 21:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e3d5b$0$10193$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607162 |
On 11/29/2016 8:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/29/2016 6:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>>>>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>>>>>>>> you think. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>>>>>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>>>>>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>>>>>>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>>>>>>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>>>>>>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>>>>>>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is no "HAARP patent". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >>>>>>>> again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nice try to change the subject kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the >>>>>>> patent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>>>>>>>> nothing to do with HAARP. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >>>>>>>> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>>>>>>>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just make it all up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent >>>>>> applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook >>>>>> devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for >>>>>> some assistance thinking. >>>>> >>>>> While the patent office will usually reject perpetual motion patents, they >>>>> will reject little else out of hand. >>>>> >>>>> Here's a perpetual motion machine patented in 2012 that calls itself >>>>> something else: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8112992.pdf >>>>> >>>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real >>>>> and the patent office actually tests the claims of a patent to ensure >>>>> they are true. >>>> >>>> So patent your perpetual motion machine and see how far your application >>>> gets. Nutjob. >>> >>> The kook changes the arguement as it has backed itself into a corner. >>> >>> The bottom line is the so called "HAARP patent" has nothing to do with >>> the HAARP project or anyone associated with it kook. >> >> And your opinon is of course proof. You can't find any papers (more >> likely won't) and yet you claim to have read the HAARP patent in detail? > > Yes, I have read the so called "HAARP patent" in detail and it is not > associated in any way with the actual HAARP project or anyone that > is part of the actual HAARP project kook. > > Here is is again kook: > > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 > > Point to anyone or anything from the actual HAARP project or any mention > of HAARP in this kook patent. > > It is true the author claimed HAARP infringed his patents, but like you, > he was laughed at kook. > So it's OK to cheat inventors if you can and steal their ideas? Sounds like your way of operating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 06:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cl62hd-9sg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607187 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 8:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/29/2016 6:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:14 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:09 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 1:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - show quoted text - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's as simple as that. Trust me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He thinks both The Men Who Stare at Goats and Ghostbusters were documentaries. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously you and HVAC think all novels and Hollywood movies are true, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and documentaries are "conspiracy theories" by kooks to be laughed at. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You are the one that seems to believe in psychic phenomena, kook. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not join the rest of us here in reality? It's really not as bad as >>>>>>>>>>>>> you think. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Reality like remote viewsing, contrails are something other than engine >>>>>>>>>>>> exhaust and water vapor, HAARP is weather manipulation and all the >>>>>>>>>>>> other silly nonsense you believe in kook? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, governments never lie. HVAC told me and you believe it. >>>>>>>>>>> You are FAR too stupid to even remember that I pointed out the HAARP >>>>>>>>>>> patent includes weather modification. But you aren't even capable of >>>>>>>>>>> reading a paten let along understanding it. Just go with your bold >>>>>>>>>>> assertions. That works for HVAC and he's moderator of this newsgroup. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is no "HAARP patent". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you could use some education. Obviously you are just making it all up >>>>>>>>> again. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nice try to change the subject kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The so called "HAARP patent" can be found here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You will find no mention of HAARP or anyone connected to HAARP in the >>>>>>>> patent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is a patent by an individual that sounds like HAARP but has >>>>>>>>>> nothing to do with HAARP. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are making it up. No, I'm not going to go look up the real patent >>>>>>>>> for you. You couldn't understand it if I did. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You will find the Patent Office reference above kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, it does mention weather modification along with a bunch of other >>>>>>>>>> kook claims such as aircraft destruction with relativistic particles. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just make it all up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Look in the paragraph titled "DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION" kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kook. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your and HVAC's level of science. How many patents do you hold ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you don't believe that the patent office reviews all patent >>>>>>> applications and refuses things like perpetual motion and other kook >>>>>>> devices? What fantasy world are you living in? Assisted living? Ask for >>>>>>> some assistance thinking. >>>>>> >>>>>> While the patent office will usually reject perpetual motion patents, they >>>>>> will reject little else out of hand. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's a perpetual motion machine patented in 2012 that calls itself >>>>>> something else: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8112992.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> Like most kooks you believe that because something is patented it is real >>>>>> and the patent office actually tests the claims of a patent to ensure >>>>>> they are true. >>>>> >>>>> So patent your perpetual motion machine and see how far your application >>>>> gets. Nutjob. >>>> >>>> The kook changes the arguement as it has backed itself into a corner. >>>> >>>> The bottom line is the so called "HAARP patent" has nothing to do with >>>> the HAARP project or anyone associated with it kook. >>> >>> And your opinon is of course proof. You can't find any papers (more >>> likely won't) and yet you claim to have read the HAARP patent in detail? >> >> Yes, I have read the so called "HAARP patent" in detail and it is not >> associated in any way with the actual HAARP project or anyone that >> is part of the actual HAARP project kook. >> >> Here is is again kook: >> >> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,686,605.PN.&OS=PN/4,686,605&RS=PN/4,686,605 >> >> Point to anyone or anything from the actual HAARP project or any mention >> of HAARP in this kook patent. >> >> It is true the author claimed HAARP infringed his patents, but like you, >> he was laughed at kook. >> > So it's OK to cheat inventors if you can and steal their ideas? > Sounds like your way of operating. Like most kooks you seem to think that patents prevent everyone from building what is patented; they don't. They only prevent others from building what is patented for profit. Not that this has anything at all to do with the HAARP project, which was a research project that had nothing to do with the patent you keep screeching about nor was it a commercial project that could possibly be covered by patents kook. So your drivel aboue cheating inventors is just that, drivel in an attempt to change the subject kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 18:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58362935$0$34559$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606089 |
On 11/23/2016 7:35 AM, HVAC wrote: > benj > - show quoted text - > Upset? You wish. When I say "no offense" I'm only speaking truth. Truth > is no reason for froth. Remote viewing projects have documentation > (which doesn't qualify as proof in your fantasy world). Army DIA exists > and if you ask I'll prove it to you, but then have to kill you. > ------------ > > There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period. > > It's as simple as that. Trust me. The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know". You are such a blowhard, HVAC. You make Bert look positively sane.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web