Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #521595 > unrolled thread

The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:31 +0200
    Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:07 -0400
      Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 07:55 +0200
        Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-18 17:59 -0400
          Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:56 +0200
            Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 00:47 -0400
              Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 17:15 +0200
                Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:07 +0200
                  Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 22:23 -0700
                    Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 00:37 -0700
                      Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 07:01 -0500
                        Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 06:29 -0700
                    Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
                  The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
                  The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change, Pt.1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:54 +0200
                  The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change, Pt. 3 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:04 +0200
                  Re: Money doesn't buy you health. Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 07:40 -0700
    Re: The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:53 +0200

#521595 — The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change

<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-lies-and-deceptions-of-loose.html>
===========================================================
1. Claim: Charles Burlingame, an ex-Navy F4 pilot who worked in the
Pentagon, participated in an exercise simulating crashing a 757 into a
building in October 2000, before retiring to take a job at American
Airlines.

Truth: Charles Burlingame started working for AA in 1979 and retired
from the Naval Reserve in 1996, 4 years before these supposed
exercises took place.
Source:<http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/cfburling3.htm>
---------------
2. Claim: Investors with prior knowledge of 9/11 made millions buying
put options on airline stock.

Truth: Both the 9/11 committee and business journalists investigated
this claim and found nothing unusual. Much of the investment also
involved purchasing airline stock.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/sell-sell-sell.html>
---------------
3. Claim: Plane crashing into World Trade Center was identified as a
windowless cargo plane.

Truth: The man who claimed this, Marc Birnbach, was over 2 miles away
at the time.
Source:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20090220062801/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=3&c=y>
---------------
4. Claim: An air traffic controller reported that they thought flight
77 was a military plane.

Truth: The full quote was referring to the unsafe way the plane was
flying, not that it was impossible for a civilian plane to fly like
that. "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all
thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic
controllers, that that was a military plane you don't fly a 757 in
that manner. It's unsafe."
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/it-was-military-plane.html>
---------------
5. Claim, Flight 77 managed to tear 5 light poles completely out of
the ground, without damaging either the wings or the light poles
themselves.

Truth: We don’t know that the wings were undamaged, since they crashed
into the Pentagon fractions of a second later. There are pictures of
the light poles, however, which show them broken and twisted.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/those-magic-light-poles.html>
---------------
6. Claim: The official explanation for flight 77 at the Pentagon is
that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane.

Truth: No official has made that claim, and in fact numerous pieces of
the plane, including the bodies of the passengers, and the black boxes
were found.
Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html>
---------------
7. Claim: A spokesman for Rolls-Royce stated that engine parts found
at the Pentagon did not belong to any of their engines.

Truth: The spokesman stated specifically that he was not an engineer
and was not familiar with the engine in question.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/jet-engine-red-herrings.html>
---------------
8. Claim: Karl Schwarz President and Chief Executive Officer of Patmos
Nanotechnologies LLC and I-Nets Security Systems, identified the
engine as being a JT8D turbojet engine belonging to an A-3 Skywarrior.

Karl Schwarz is a proven fraud and conspiracy theorist, with no known
background in technology or avionics. His companies are shell
corporations with no employees or products. Furthermore, the A-3
Skywarrior never used a JT8D engine. The engine in question is
consistent with that of the Rolls-Royce RB211 used by the 757.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/who-is-karl-schwarz.html>
Source: <http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml>
---------------
9. Claim: Employees at the Pentagon were seen suspiciously carrying
away a large box shrouded in a blue tarp.

Truth: The blue tarp was a tent, used to aid in the crash response.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/its-just-mistake.html>
---------------
10. Claim: The damage to the Pentagon was completely inconsistent with
a Boeing 757.

Truth: Studies by NIST, the ASCE and Purdue University, including
computer simulations show that the damage was perfectly in keeping
with a crashing airplane.
Source:
<http://web.archive.org/web/20070706182955/http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html>
===========================================================


<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-lies-and-deceptions-of-loose_15.html>
===========================================================
11. Claim: The only damage to the outer wall of the Pentagon was a
single hole, no more than 16 feet in diameter.

Truth: The hole was approximately 90 feet wide. The 16 foot
measurement was only achieved by looking at pictures where the rest of
the hole was obscured by smoke and foam from the firefighters.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/men-always-lie-about-size.html>
---------------
12. Claim: No wreckage was found on the Pentagon lawn.

Truth: There are numerous pictures of plane wreckage, including those
with the American Airlines paint scheme.
Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html>
---------------
13. Claim: A 16 foot hole was punched in the C ring of the Pentagon by
the airplane’s soft carbon fiber nose.

Truth: It was a 12 foot hole, and it was made by the much more
resilient nose landing gear.
Source:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20060831031120/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&amp;c=y>
---------------
14. Claim: A cruise missile hit the Pentagon

Truth: Over a hundred documented witnesses, and many more unrecorded,
saw in broad daylight a large commercial jetliner crash into the
Pentagon. Many even specifically identified the airline. To this day,
not a single person has come forward claiming to have seen a cruise
missile.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/better-pentagon-image.html>
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/which-one-of-these-is-not-like-other.html>
---------------
15. Claim: A white marking on the lawn the week before indicated the
path of the crash.

Truth: This section of the Pentagon was being renovated and cables
were being laid. And why would a cruise missile need directions
anyway?
Source: <http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html>
---------------
16. Claim: A number of military personnel at the Pentagon specifically
mentioned smelling cordite.

Truth: The person (not a number of military personnel) in question was
a lawyer not a munitions expert, and cordite is used in ammunition,
not explosives.
Source: <http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2001/09/19perkal.html>
---------------
17. Claim: WTC 7, a 47 story office building 300 feet away from the
North Tower, suddenly collapsed for no reason.

Truth: There was nothing sudden about it. The building was hit by
falling debris from one of the towers, was missing much of one corner,
had a huge hole in the middle and was on fire for hours. The building
had started leaning and making creaking noises so fire department
officials ordered the evacuation of the area over an hour earlier.
Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html>
Source: <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/wtc-7.html>
---------------
18. Claim: On July 28th, 1945, a B-52 bomber lost in the fog crashed
into the 79th floor of the Empire State Building, 14 people dead, 1
million dollars in damage. But, the building stands intact to this
day.

Truth: It was a B-25 bomber (the B-52 was not produced until 9 years
later), a propeller driven plane about 1/10th the size of a 767, and
was traveling about 1/4th the speed. The fire only covered part of one
floor, and was extinguished in less than an hour.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/maybe-they-will-fix-it-in-version-30.html>
---------------
19. Claim: On February 23rd, 1991, a 38 story skyscraper in
Philadelphia burned for more than 19 hours and spread over 8 floors.
It did not collapse.

Truth: The firefighters fought the fire for 11 hours before they
evacuated the building fearing a collapse. The building, which was
never hit by an aircraft, was structurally unsound and later had to be
demolished.
Source: <http://www.interfire.org/res_file/pdf/Tr-049.pdf>
---------------
20. Claim: The south tower collapsed in just 9.2 seconds.

Truth: It is difficult to time because of all the smoke and debris,
but it took significantly longer.
Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/freefall.html>
===========================================================


<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-lies-and-deceptions-in-loose.html>
===========================================================
21. Claim: 200,000 tons of steel shattered into sections no longer
than a couple feet long.

Truth: Sections of the World Trade Center, often hundreds of feet long
survived.
Source:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20071215225510/http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/inside911/gallery_firemen_debris_world_trade_center.html>
---------------
22. Claim: Kevin Ryan from Underwriters Laboratories, the company that
certified the steel that was used in the World Trade Center, stated
the steel should not have melted at the temperatures they were exposed
to.

Truth: Kevin Ryan worked in the water testing department, nobody
claimed the steel melted, and UL did not certify it in the first place
(OK, that is technically 3 lies).
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/loose-screw-3-kevin-ryan-of.html>
---------------
23. Claim: Numerous firefighters and other witnesses heard explosions
in the world trade center indicating the use of demolitions.

Truth: A jet liner with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel crashed into each
of the towers at 500 mph. It would be suspicious if they didn’t hear
subsequent explosions.
Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/accounts_of_explosions.html>

NOTE: Some of those "explosions" were the viscoelastic dampers melting
in the fire. They held the floor spars and truss frame together. The
floor spars provided horizontal support to the truss frame, the truss
frame provided vertical support to the floor spars. The interface
between these two structural components was pre-loaded to offset the
effect of the building's weight causing the truss frame to bow. When
the viscoelastic dampers went, they released a lot of potential
energy. Some of the "explosions" heard were the elevators dropping
into the basement. Their cables had been cut and weakened by the crash
and ensuing fire. Still more of the explosions were the jet fuel
dumped down the elevator shafts, which ignited when the broken
elevator car electrical cables sparked and ignited the jet fuel fumes.
---------------
24. Claim: Ben Fountain, a financial analyst who worked in the World
Trade Center, told People Magazine that in the weeks before 9-11,
there were a number of unannounced and unusual drills where sections
of both the Twin Towers and building 7 were evacuated for 'security
reasons'.

Truth: Mr. Fountain only stated that his tower was evacuated. He
didn’t say it in the context that the film presents, that this somehow
gave them the opportunity to plant explosives, but to say that there
were previous threats against the towers. Other sources used by the
conspiracy movement contradict this.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/ben-lying-again.html>
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/ben-fountain-meet-scott-forbes.html>
---------------
25. Claim: Bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the World Trade Center
only days before the attack.

Truth: Security was actually increased for a couple of weeks; this
“removal” was just security returning to normal.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/ben-lying-again.html>
---------------
26. Claim: Seismic records prove that explosives were used in the
World Trade Center

Truth: The Columbia University seismic center specifically states that
their records do not support such a conclusion.
Source:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20060209110757/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=5&amp;c=y>
---------------
27. Mayor Giuliani shipped off the remains of the World Trade Center
before anyone could look at it.

Truth: FEMA, the FBI, the NTSB and the NIST all conducted in depth
investigations, including removal and testing of debris. An extensive
report is available at http://www.nist.gov/

<https://archive.org/details/NIST_WTC_Repository>
---------------
28. Claim: Not even FEMA was allowed into Ground Zero.

Truth: False, they were involved in the investigation and even
produced the first report.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/coverup-that-wasnt.html>
---------------
29. Claim: At the United 93 crash site “there was nothing. Nothing
that you can distinguish that a plane had crashed there. “

Truth: Extensive debris including engines, personal effects, body
parts and the black boxes were found at the crash site. Pictures of
many of these items were introduced into evidence as the Zacarias
Moussaoui trial.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/moussaoui-trial-exhibits.html>
---------------
30. Claim: Wally Miller, a Somerset County coroner stated that there
were no bodies found at the crash site of United 93.

Truth: There were no “whole” bodies, but over 1500 body parts were
found, and most of the passengers were identified through the use of
DNA. Mr. Miller later reported his findings on this.
Source:
<http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/loose-screw-2-coroner.html>
===========================================================

You kooks also might want to look into the following:
1) The pressurized diesel tank in WTC7's basement that fed an
emergency generator on the 5th floor... the line broke and spewed
diesel that fed the fire for hours.

2) The planes that hit the WTC towers were primarily constructed of
2219-T81 aluminum... with a melting point of 950 F. Water in contact
with a catalyst can dissociate at much lower temperatures than the
~3000 F necessary for catalyst-free dissociation. Molten aluminum is
such a catalyst. The prodigious quantities of plastic (petroleum
derived) in the towers thermally cracked, off-gassing combustibles
such as benzene, ethylene and naphtha, some of which burns as hot as
3000 F. The molten aluminum ran down through the building, evaporating
the water from the sprinklers and turning it into steam. The steam
rose back up through the building (still in contact with those
rivulets of molten aircraft frame aluminum) and came into contact with
the fires from the plastics off-gassing and thus burning as hot as
3000 F. The steam dissociated into oxygen and hydrogen (oxyhydrogen).
Oxyhydrogen can burn at upwards of 5070 F. It burns so hot it can melt
quartz (which melts at up to 3115 F):

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7j6mm9_TnA>

3) The planes (a Boeing 767-200 and Boeing 767-200ER) have a
factory-specified MTOW of 197.5 tons. After the fuel burned off, that
still leaves ~163.5 tons per plane. The floors, as I proved, were
already close to (if not slightly over) their 100 pound per square
foot load limit due to all the modernities in modern offices... just
what do you think adding an additional 163.5 *tons* of weight would do
to those floor spars, especially given that the floor spars were in an
inferno *and* had lost their viscoelastic dampers (and thus their
vertical means of perimeter support) in the area of the fire?

4) The lie that the WTC towers were the first in history to fall due
to fires is just that... a lie:

Message-ID: <a07468688db77a10dbf968ff5620e4c2@dizum.com>
====================================================
There is a long list of buildings that have had the spray-on
insulation and suffered fire damage resulting in partial or complete
collapse. The McCormick Center, the Sight and Sound Theater, the Kader
Toy Factory in Singapore, the Dogwood Elementary School in Virginia,
the Windsor Tower in Madrid, the Wisma Kosgoro in Jakarta, the Alexis
Nihon Plaza Montreal, One New York Plaza (connection bolts sheared
during fire, causing several steel filler beams on the 33-34th floors
to fall and rest on the bottom flanges of their supporting girders),
and several other examples.

And the complete list. 22 multi-story buildings from 1970 to 2002 have
collapsed solely from fire damage weakening their structural
integrity... 6 of them being steel-framed buildings, all of those 6
being taller than 20 stories:
<http://www.jensenhughes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/White_Paper_Historical_Survey_Building_Collapse_NIST_JBeitel-NIwankiw_OCT-2006.pdf>
====================================================

That you kooks cannot grasp the enormity of the forces involved leads
you to make false assumptions... and once emotionally invested in
your decision to remain uneducated, you continue to compound and
expand your stupidity and insanity, eventually culminating in the
hilariously wrong types of conclusions that kooks such as Michael
Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) arrive at. This is the process that leads
you into insanity.

Morons.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#521602

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:31:11 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-lies-and-deceptions-of-loose.html>
> ===========================================================
> 1. Claim: Charles Burlingame, an ex-Navy F4 pilot who worked in the
> Pentagon, participated in an exercise simulating crashing a 757 into a
> building in October 2000, before retiring to take a job at American
> Airlines.
>
> Truth: Charles Burlingame started working for AA in 1979 and retired
> from the Naval Reserve in 1996, 4 years before these supposed
> exercises took place.
> Source:<http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/cfburling3.htm>
> ---------------
> 2. Claim: Investors with prior knowledge of 9/11 made millions buying
> put options on airline stock.
>
> Truth: Both the 9/11 committee and business journalists investigated
> this claim and found nothing unusual. Much of the investment also
> involved purchasing airline stock.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/sell-sell-sell.html>
> ---------------
> 3. Claim: Plane crashing into World Trade Center was identified as a
> windowless cargo plane.
>
> Truth: The man who claimed this, Marc Birnbach, was over 2 miles away
> at the time.
> Source:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20090220062801/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=3&c=y>
> ---------------
> 4. Claim: An air traffic controller reported that they thought flight
> 77 was a military plane.
>
> Truth: The full quote was referring to the unsafe way the plane was
> flying, not that it was impossible for a civilian plane to fly like
> that. "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all
> thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic
> controllers, that that was a military plane you don't fly a 757 in
> that manner. It's unsafe."
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/it-was-military-plane.html>
> ---------------
> 5. Claim, Flight 77 managed to tear 5 light poles completely out of
> the ground, without damaging either the wings or the light poles
> themselves.
>
> Truth: We don’t know that the wings were undamaged, since they crashed
> into the Pentagon fractions of a second later. There are pictures of
> the light poles, however, which show them broken and twisted.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/those-magic-light-poles.html>
> ---------------
> 6. Claim: The official explanation for flight 77 at the Pentagon is
> that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane.
>
> Truth: No official has made that claim, and in fact numerous pieces of
> the plane, including the bodies of the passengers, and the black boxes
> were found.
> Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html>
> ---------------
> 7. Claim: A spokesman for Rolls-Royce stated that engine parts found
> at the Pentagon did not belong to any of their engines.
>
> Truth: The spokesman stated specifically that he was not an engineer
> and was not familiar with the engine in question.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/jet-engine-red-herrings.html>
> ---------------
> 8. Claim: Karl Schwarz President and Chief Executive Officer of Patmos
> Nanotechnologies LLC and I-Nets Security Systems, identified the
> engine as being a JT8D turbojet engine belonging to an A-3 Skywarrior.
>
> Karl Schwarz is a proven fraud and conspiracy theorist, with no known
> background in technology or avionics. His companies are shell
> corporations with no employees or products. Furthermore, the A-3
> Skywarrior never used a JT8D engine. The engine in question is
> consistent with that of the Rolls-Royce RB211 used by the 757.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/who-is-karl-schwarz.html>
> Source: <http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml>
> ---------------
> 9. Claim: Employees at the Pentagon were seen suspiciously carrying
> away a large box shrouded in a blue tarp.
>
> Truth: The blue tarp was a tent, used to aid in the crash response.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/its-just-mistake.html>
> ---------------
> 10. Claim: The damage to the Pentagon was completely inconsistent with
> a Boeing 757.
>
> Truth: Studies by NIST, the ASCE and Purdue University, including
> computer simulations show that the damage was perfectly in keeping
> with a crashing airplane.
> Source:
> <http://web.archive.org/web/20070706182955/http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html>
> ===========================================================
>
>
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-lies-and-deceptions-of-loose_15.html>
> ===========================================================
> 11. Claim: The only damage to the outer wall of the Pentagon was a
> single hole, no more than 16 feet in diameter.
>
> Truth: The hole was approximately 90 feet wide. The 16 foot
> measurement was only achieved by looking at pictures where the rest of
> the hole was obscured by smoke and foam from the firefighters.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/men-always-lie-about-size.html>
> ---------------
> 12. Claim: No wreckage was found on the Pentagon lawn.
>
> Truth: There are numerous pictures of plane wreckage, including those
> with the American Airlines paint scheme.
> Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html>
> ---------------
> 13. Claim: A 16 foot hole was punched in the C ring of the Pentagon by
> the airplane’s soft carbon fiber nose.
>
> Truth: It was a 12 foot hole, and it was made by the much more
> resilient nose landing gear.
> Source:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20060831031120/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&amp;c=y>
> ---------------
> 14. Claim: A cruise missile hit the Pentagon
>
> Truth: Over a hundred documented witnesses, and many more unrecorded,
> saw in broad daylight a large commercial jetliner crash into the
> Pentagon. Many even specifically identified the airline. To this day,
> not a single person has come forward claiming to have seen a cruise
> missile.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/better-pentagon-image.html>
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/which-one-of-these-is-not-like-other.html>
> ---------------
> 15. Claim: A white marking on the lawn the week before indicated the
> path of the crash.
>
> Truth: This section of the Pentagon was being renovated and cables
> were being laid. And why would a cruise missile need directions
> anyway?
> Source: <http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html>
> ---------------
> 16. Claim: A number of military personnel at the Pentagon specifically
> mentioned smelling cordite.
>
> Truth: The person (not a number of military personnel) in question was
> a lawyer not a munitions expert, and cordite is used in ammunition,
> not explosives.
> Source: <http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2001/09/19perkal.html>
> ---------------
> 17. Claim: WTC 7, a 47 story office building 300 feet away from the
> North Tower, suddenly collapsed for no reason.
>
> Truth: There was nothing sudden about it. The building was hit by
> falling debris from one of the towers, was missing much of one corner,
> had a huge hole in the middle and was on fire for hours. The building
> had started leaning and making creaking noises so fire department
> officials ordered the evacuation of the area over an hour earlier.
> Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html>
> Source: <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/wtc-7.html>
> ---------------
> 18. Claim: On July 28th, 1945, a B-52 bomber lost in the fog crashed
> into the 79th floor of the Empire State Building, 14 people dead, 1
> million dollars in damage. But, the building stands intact to this
> day.
>
> Truth: It was a B-25 bomber (the B-52 was not produced until 9 years
> later), a propeller driven plane about 1/10th the size of a 767, and
> was traveling about 1/4th the speed. The fire only covered part of one
> floor, and was extinguished in less than an hour.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/maybe-they-will-fix-it-in-version-30.html>
> ---------------
> 19. Claim: On February 23rd, 1991, a 38 story skyscraper in
> Philadelphia burned for more than 19 hours and spread over 8 floors.
> It did not collapse.
>
> Truth: The firefighters fought the fire for 11 hours before they
> evacuated the building fearing a collapse. The building, which was
> never hit by an aircraft, was structurally unsound and later had to be
> demolished.
> Source: <http://www.interfire.org/res_file/pdf/Tr-049.pdf>
> ---------------
> 20. Claim: The south tower collapsed in just 9.2 seconds.
>
> Truth: It is difficult to time because of all the smoke and debris,
> but it took significantly longer.
> Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/freefall.html>
> ===========================================================
>
>
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/top-lies-and-deceptions-in-loose.html>
> ===========================================================
> 21. Claim: 200,000 tons of steel shattered into sections no longer
> than a couple feet long.
>
> Truth: Sections of the World Trade Center, often hundreds of feet long
> survived.
> Source:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20071215225510/http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/inside911/gallery_firemen_debris_world_trade_center.html>
> ---------------
> 22. Claim: Kevin Ryan from Underwriters Laboratories, the company that
> certified the steel that was used in the World Trade Center, stated
> the steel should not have melted at the temperatures they were exposed
> to.
>
> Truth: Kevin Ryan worked in the water testing department, nobody
> claimed the steel melted, and UL did not certify it in the first place
> (OK, that is technically 3 lies).
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/loose-screw-3-kevin-ryan-of.html>
> ---------------
> 23. Claim: Numerous firefighters and other witnesses heard explosions
> in the world trade center indicating the use of demolitions.
>
> Truth: A jet liner with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel crashed into each
> of the towers at 500 mph. It would be suspicious if they didn’t hear
> subsequent explosions.
> Source: <http://www.911myths.com/html/accounts_of_explosions.html>
>
> NOTE: Some of those "explosions" were the viscoelastic dampers melting
> in the fire. They held the floor spars and truss frame together. The
> floor spars provided horizontal support to the truss frame, the truss
> frame provided vertical support to the floor spars. The interface
> between these two structural components was pre-loaded to offset the
> effect of the building's weight causing the truss frame to bow. When
> the viscoelastic dampers went, they released a lot of potential
> energy. Some of the "explosions" heard were the elevators dropping
> into the basement. Their cables had been cut and weakened by the crash
> and ensuing fire. Still more of the explosions were the jet fuel
> dumped down the elevator shafts, which ignited when the broken
> elevator car electrical cables sparked and ignited the jet fuel fumes.
> ---------------
> 24. Claim: Ben Fountain, a financial analyst who worked in the World
> Trade Center, told People Magazine that in the weeks before 9-11,
> there were a number of unannounced and unusual drills where sections
> of both the Twin Towers and building 7 were evacuated for 'security
> reasons'.
>
> Truth: Mr. Fountain only stated that his tower was evacuated. He
> didn’t say it in the context that the film presents, that this somehow
> gave them the opportunity to plant explosives, but to say that there
> were previous threats against the towers. Other sources used by the
> conspiracy movement contradict this.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/ben-lying-again.html>
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/ben-fountain-meet-scott-forbes.html>
> ---------------
> 25. Claim: Bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the World Trade Center
> only days before the attack.
>
> Truth: Security was actually increased for a couple of weeks; this
> “removal” was just security returning to normal.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/ben-lying-again.html>
> ---------------
> 26. Claim: Seismic records prove that explosives were used in the
> World Trade Center
>
> Truth: The Columbia University seismic center specifically states that
> their records do not support such a conclusion.
> Source:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20060209110757/http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=5&amp;c=y>
> ---------------
> 27. Mayor Giuliani shipped off the remains of the World Trade Center
> before anyone could look at it.
>
> Truth: FEMA, the FBI, the NTSB and the NIST all conducted in depth
> investigations, including removal and testing of debris. An extensive
> report is available at http://www.nist.gov/
>
> <https://archive.org/details/NIST_WTC_Repository>
> ---------------
> 28. Claim: Not even FEMA was allowed into Ground Zero.
>
> Truth: False, they were involved in the investigation and even
> produced the first report.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/coverup-that-wasnt.html>
> ---------------
> 29. Claim: At the United 93 crash site “there was nothing. Nothing
> that you can distinguish that a plane had crashed there. “
>
> Truth: Extensive debris including engines, personal effects, body
> parts and the black boxes were found at the crash site. Pictures of
> many of these items were introduced into evidence as the Zacarias
> Moussaoui trial.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/moussaoui-trial-exhibits.html>
> ---------------
> 30. Claim: Wally Miller, a Somerset County coroner stated that there
> were no bodies found at the crash site of United 93.
>
> Truth: There were no “whole” bodies, but over 1500 body parts were
> found, and most of the passengers were identified through the use of
> DNA. Mr. Miller later reported his findings on this.
> Source:
> <http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/loose-screw-2-coroner.html>
> ===========================================================
>
> You kooks also might want to look into the following:
> 1) The pressurized diesel tank in WTC7's basement that fed an
> emergency generator on the 5th floor... the line broke and spewed
> diesel that fed the fire for hours.
>
> 2) The planes that hit the WTC towers were primarily constructed of
> 2219-T81 aluminum... with a melting point of 950 F. Water in contact
> with a catalyst can dissociate at much lower temperatures than the
> ~3000 F necessary for catalyst-free dissociation. Molten aluminum is
> such a catalyst. The prodigious quantities of plastic (petroleum
> derived) in the towers thermally cracked, off-gassing combustibles
> such as benzene, ethylene and naphtha, some of which burns as hot as
> 3000 F. The molten aluminum ran down through the building, evaporating
> the water from the sprinklers and turning it into steam. The steam
> rose back up through the building (still in contact with those
> rivulets of molten aircraft frame aluminum) and came into contact with
> the fires from the plastics off-gassing and thus burning as hot as
> 3000 F. The steam dissociated into oxygen and hydrogen (oxyhydrogen).
> Oxyhydrogen can burn at upwards of 5070 F. It burns so hot it can melt
> quartz (which melts at up to 3115 F):
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7j6mm9_TnA>
>
> 3) The planes (a Boeing 767-200 and Boeing 767-200ER) have a
> factory-specified MTOW of 197.5 tons. After the fuel burned off, that
> still leaves ~163.5 tons per plane. The floors, as I proved, were
> already close to (if not slightly over) their 100 pound per square
> foot load limit due to all the modernities in modern offices... just
> what do you think adding an additional 163.5 *tons* of weight would do
> to those floor spars, especially given that the floor spars were in an
> inferno *and* had lost their viscoelastic dampers (and thus their
> vertical means of perimeter support) in the area of the fire?
>
> 4) The lie that the WTC towers were the first in history to fall due
> to fires is just that... a lie:
>
> Message-ID: <a07468688db77a10dbf968ff5620e4c2@dizum.com>
> ====================================================
> There is a long list of buildings that have had the spray-on
> insulation and suffered fire damage resulting in partial or complete
> collapse. The McCormick Center, the Sight and Sound Theater, the Kader
> Toy Factory in Singapore, the Dogwood Elementary School in Virginia,
> the Windsor Tower in Madrid, the Wisma Kosgoro in Jakarta, the Alexis
> Nihon Plaza Montreal, One New York Plaza (connection bolts sheared
> during fire, causing several steel filler beams on the 33-34th floors
> to fall and rest on the bottom flanges of their supporting girders),
> and several other examples.
>
> And the complete list. 22 multi-story buildings from 1970 to 2002 have
> collapsed solely from fire damage weakening their structural
> integrity... 6 of them being steel-framed buildings, all of those 6
> being taller than 20 stories:
> <http://www.jensenhughes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/White_Paper_Historical_Survey_Building_Collapse_NIST_JBeitel-NIwankiw_OCT-2006.pdf>
> ====================================================
>
> That you kooks cannot grasp the enormity of the forces involved leads
> you to make false assumptions... and once emotionally invested in
> your decision to remain uneducated, you continue to compound and
> expand your stupidity and insanity, eventually culminating in the
> hilariously wrong types of conclusions that kooks such as Michael
> Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) arrive at. This is the process that leads
> you into insanity.
>
> Morons.
>
> <snicker>
>

that was also the truth 15 years ago, idiot.  what is your mental  
malfunction that makes you think that anybody who is stupid enough to  
latch on to any random conspiracy theory is going to suddenly grow an  
extra brain cell and listen to you?  you're dumber than emmett, burnore,  
and gerg thrown into an industrial size waring blender.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521783

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x43cip2htm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> that was also the truth 15 years ago, idiot.  what is your mental  
> malfunction that makes you think that anybody who is stupid enough to  
> latch on to any random conspiracy theory is going to suddenly grow an  
> extra brain cell and listen to you?  you're dumber than emmett, burnore,  
> and gerg thrown into an industrial size waring blender.

Because it makes TrooferTards and other similiar-ilk retards bleat out
your butthurt, DildoRider.

I was hoping you'd start barfing TrooferTardisms yourself, just to be
contrary, but you're apparently so cowed after having gotten your
stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by your Usenet Lord And Master
that you don't dare do anything more than shed tears.

<snicker>

-- 

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
(aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521886

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:55:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x43cip2htm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

<snippage noted>

>
>> that was also the truth 15 years ago, idiot.  what is your mental
>> malfunction that makes you think that anybody who is stupid enough to
>> latch on to any random conspiracy theory is going to suddenly grow an
>> extra brain cell and listen to you?  you're dumber than emmett, burnore,
>> and gerg thrown into an industrial size waring blender.
>
> Because it makes TrooferTards and other similiar-ilk retards bleat out
> your butthurt, DildoRider.
>
> I was hoping you'd start barfing TrooferTardisms yourself,

sorry, i'm not a konservativeKo0k konspiracy theorist, dummy.

in 2000 or so i had a goofy college roommate who wanted me to come to NYC  
during break and risk my life in order to see one of the shittiest  
filthiest overrated cities in this country.  i reminded her that daddy  
bush's son just got elected and that's not going to look good to the  
half-illiterate fundies who tried twice before to do the job.  anybody who  
thought this wasn't going to happen is, in my opinion, a complete dullard.

> just to be
> contrary,

<projection noted.>  free cloo: you just admitted which one of us takes  
usenet a little too seriously, captain america.

> but you're apparently so cowed after having gotten your
> stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by your Usenet Lord And Master
> that you don't dare do anything more than shed tears.

...and when is that scheduled to happen?

>
> <snicker>
>

...and then you woke up beside your imaginary "hawt wife".  BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521949

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x46h0uidtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:55:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x43cip2htm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> <sni

I only snip that which is irrelevant.

<snicker>

>>> that was also the truth 15 years ago, idiot.  what is your mental
>>> malfunction that makes you think that anybody who is stupid enough to
>>> latch on to any random conspiracy theory is going to suddenly grow an
>>> extra brain cell and listen to you?  you're dumber than emmett, burnore,
>>> and gerg thrown into an industrial size waring blender.

>> Because it makes TrooferTards and other similiar-ilk retards bleat out
>> your butthurt, DildoRider.
>>
>> I was hoping you'd start barfing TrooferTardisms yourself,

> sorry, i'm not a konservativeKo0k konspiracy theorist dummy.

No, but you are a punching dummy for conservatives, DildoRider.
Otherwise known as a libtard.

<snicker>

> in 2000 or so i had a goofy college roommate who wanted me to come to NYC  
> during break and risk my life in order to see one of the shittiest  
> filthiest overrated cities in this country.  i reminded her that daddy  
> bush's son just got elected and that's not going to look good to the  
> half-illiterate fundies who tried twice before to do the job.  anybody who  
> thought this wasn't going to happen is, in my opinion, a complete dullard.

Ah, there's some TrooferTardism barfage from you. Good boy.

<snicker>

>> just to be contrary,

> <projection noted.>  free cloo: you just admitted which one of us takes  
> usenet a little too seriously,

That'd be you, FootStomper.

<snicker>

> captain america.

Close, but no cigar.

<snicker>

>> but you're apparently so cowed after having gotten your
>> stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by your Usenet Lord And Master
>> that you don't dare do anything more than shed tears.

> ...and when is that scheduled to happen?

Wipe your tears, DildoRider. I've deconstructed your libtard lie of
global warming to such a point you've given up even trying to
promulgate that lie anymore. You don't dare try to argue your libtard
"Eat The Rich" blather for fear of getting stomped to paste again.
Your libtard "Let's Vaccinate Our Way To World Depopulation By
Poisoning The Brown Countries Into Sterility" program has been exposed
as the ongoing libtard Sangeresque eugenics program that it is. Your
lie of libtards believing in civil rights has been exposed with the
truth of your party opposing every single major civil rights bill that
ever came to pass, and only bringing forward one such 'civil rights'
bill (such as it is) of their own (the 1990 ADA) which was merely a
rehash of older bills with niggling legalistic minutiae added... what
part of your kooky libtard ideology do you have left to cling to? Ah,
your touchy-feely "we want to *FEEL* good about ourselves and k'lame
that we're doing good... but we're far too stupid to come up with any
solutions that actually do good, and we're far too delusional to face
the reality that people should earn their way through life, rather
than turning them into defacto governmental slaves, little more than
domesticated pets dependent upon their government for their very
subsistence" libtard feelgoodisms... but I'm sure even you're smart
enough to figure out that's just pandering blather for the libtard
freeloaders, used by politicians to get votes.

<snicker>

>> <snicker>

> ...and then you woke up beside your imaginary "hawt wife".  BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

You're jealous that I have a hot wife. I understand. An ugly emo
scarecrow such as yourself has trouble attracting anything other than
dudes. Perhaps if you didn't hang out solely in gay bars, you'd meet a
hot woman too. Prolly not. You are pretty fucking fugly, after all.

And stoooopid.

And gay.

<snicker>

-- 

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
(aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522426

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 01:56:25 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x46h0uidtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:55:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x43cip2htm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> <sni
>
> I only snip that which is irrelevant.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>> that was also the truth 15 years ago, idiot.  what is your mental
>>>> malfunction that makes you think that anybody who is stupid enough to
>>>> latch on to any random conspiracy theory is going to suddenly grow an
>>>> extra brain cell and listen to you?  you're dumber than emmett,  
>>>> burnore,
>>>> and gerg thrown into an industrial size waring blender.
>
>>> Because it makes TrooferTards and other similiar-ilk retards bleat out
>>> your butthurt, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> I was hoping you'd start barfing TrooferTardisms yourself,
>
>> sorry, i'm not a konservativeKo0k konspiracy theorist dummy.
>
> No, but you are a punching dummy for conservatives, DildoRider.
> Otherwise known as a libtard.

care to explain why conservatives like you need "punching dummies".

have none of you never tried going up against the "real thing"?

>
> <snicker>
>
>> in 2000 or so i had a goofy college roommate who wanted me to come to  
>> NYC
>> during break and risk my life in order to see one of the shittiest
>> filthiest overrated cities in this country.  i reminded her that daddy
>> bush's son just got elected and that's not going to look good to the
>> half-illiterate fundies who tried twice before to do the job.  anybody  
>> who
>> thought this wasn't going to happen is, in my opinion, a complete  
>> dullard.
>
> Ah, there's some TrooferTardism barfage from you. Good boy.

gad, you're dense.  the reason we got "terristed" was because of the  
notorious and celebrated inaction of conservative blowhard assholes  
similar to yourself ignoring a warning in august 2001.

>
> <snicker>
>
>>> just to be contrary,
>
>> <projection noted.>  free cloo: you just admitted which one of us takes
>> usenet a little too seriously,
>
> That'd be you, FootStomper.

pop quiz, hotshot... which one of us talks endlessly about their feet?

>
> <snicker>
>
>> captain america.
>
> Close, but no cigar.

close, in that you portray yourself as cartoon of yourself.

>
> <snicker>
>
>>> but you're apparently so cowed after having gotten your
>>> stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by your Usenet Lord And Master
>>> that you don't dare do anything more than shed tears.
>

^ you forgot to type something here.

>> ...and when is that scheduled to happen?
>
> Wipe your tears, DildoRider. I've deconstructed your libtard lie of
> global warming to such a point you've given up even trying to
> promulgate that lie anymore. You don't dare try to argue your libtard
> "Eat The Rich" blather for fear of getting stomped to paste again.
> Your libtard "Let's Vaccinate Our Way To World Depopulation By
> Poisoning The Brown Countries Into Sterility" program has been exposed
> as the ongoing libtard Sangeresque eugenics program that it is. Your
> lie of libtards believing in civil rights has been exposed with the
> truth of your party opposing every single major civil rights bill that
> ever came to pass, and only bringing forward one such 'civil rights'
> bill (such as it is) of their own (the 1990 ADA) which was merely a
> rehash of older bills with niggling legalistic minutiae added... what
> part of your kooky libtard ideology do you have left to cling to? Ah,
> your touchy-feely "we want to *FEEL* good about ourselves and k'lame
> that we're doing good... but we're far too stupid to come up with any
> solutions that actually do good, and we're far too delusional to face
> the reality that people should earn their way through life, rather
> than turning them into defacto governmental slaves, little more than
> domesticated pets dependent upon their government for their very
> subsistence" libtard feelgoodisms... but I'm sure even you're smart
> enough to figure out that's just pandering blather for the libtard
> freeloaders, used by politicians to get votes.

and THERE'S the conservative wingnut k0okyK0nspiracy!  are you an  
anti-vaxxer nutbar?

here's hoping your kids get polio... D'OH! wait... NVM

>
> <snicker>
>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> ...and then you woke up beside your imaginary "hawt wife".   
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> You're jealous that I have a hot wife. I understand.

how can i be jealous of something that doesn't exist, as far as i'm  
concerned?

> An ugly emo
> scarecrow such as yourself has trouble attracting anything other than
> dudes.

you seem to fancy yourself an expert on what gay dudes think, it seems.

> Perhaps if you didn't hang out solely in gay bars, you'd meet a
> hot woman too. Prolly not. You are pretty fucking fugly, after all.

i rarely go to any bars, goofus.  hey, did you meet your hawt wife at  
church?

>
> And stoooopid.

oh surely, or why else would you be compelled to publicly expose yourself  
as dull fanged pseudointellectual.

>
> And gay.

anything else?

>
> <snicker>
>



-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522481

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5ap99jmtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 01:56:25 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x46h0uidtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:55:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x43cip2htm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> <sni

>> I only snip that which is irrelevant.

>>>>> that was also the truth 15 years ago, idiot.  what is your mental
>>>>> malfunction that makes you think that anybody who is stupid enough to
>>>>> latch on to any random conspiracy theory is going to suddenly grow an
>>>>> extra brain cell and listen to you?  you're dumber than emmett,  
>>>>> burnore, and gerg thrown into an industrial size waring blender.

>>>> Because it makes TrooferTards and other similiar-ilk retards bleat out
>>>> your butthurt, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> I was hoping you'd start barfing TrooferTardisms yourself,

>>> sorry, i'm not a konservativeKo0k konspiracy theorist dummy.

>> No, but you are a punching dummy for conservatives, DildoRider.
>> Otherwise known as a libtard.

> care to explain why conservatives like you need "punching dummies".

It's a testosterone thing, DildoRider. You wouldn't understand. You
can content yourself with pretending you're breastfeeding dolls,
knitting and getting rectally reamed by your girlfriend, whom you turn
into a strap-on man to satisfy your cockfetish.

<snicker>

> have none of you never tried going up against the "real thing"?

You are a real punching dummy, DildoRider. LOL

>>> in 2000 or so i had a goofy college roommate who wanted me to come to  
>>> NYC during break and risk my life in order to see one of the shittiest
>>> filthiest overrated cities in this country.  i reminded her that daddy
>>> bush's son just got elected and that's not going to look good to the
>>> half-illiterate fundies who tried twice before to do the job.  anybody  
>>> who thought this wasn't going to happen is, in my opinion, a complete  
>>> dullard.

>> Ah, there's some TrooferTardism barfage from you. Good boy.

> gad, you're dense.  the reason we got "terristed" was because of the  
> notorious and celebrated inaction of conservative blowhard assholes  
> similar to yourself ignoring a warning in august 2001.

<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/6/fitton-how-911-warnings-were-ignored/>

Whoopsie... seems the Clinton administration ignored the warnings as
well... now what will your little libtard brain do, DildoRider?
Backpedal and bleat? Yeah, you'll backpedal and bleat. LOL

>>>> just to be contrary,

>>> <projection noted.>  free cloo: you just admitted which one of us takes
>>> usenet a little too seriously,

>> That'd be you, FootStomper.

> pop quiz, hotshot... which one of us talks endlessly about their feet?

Says the guy mentioning feet. Again. So you obsess about cock so much
you turn your "girlfriend" into a strap-on dude so "she" can rectally
ream you, and you talk endlessly about feet. You've got some weird
fetishes, DildoRider. LOL

>>> captain america.

>> Close, but no cigar.

> close, in that you portray yourself as cartoon of yourself.

No, close to the superhero I portrayed in a movie due to my incredible
physique. Keep guessing, Captain DildoRider.

<snicker>

>>>> but you're apparently so cowed after having gotten your
>>>> stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by your Usenet Lord And Master
>>>> that you don't dare do anything more than shed tears.

> ^ you forgot to type something here.

Why would I reply to myself, you witless nong? Oh, did you have
another brainfart, DildoRider? LOL

>>> ...and when is that scheduled to happen?

>> Wipe your tears, DildoRider. I've deconstructed your libtard lie of
>> global warming to such a point you've given up even trying to
>> promulgate that lie anymore. You don't dare try to argue your libtard
>> "Eat The Rich" blather for fear of getting stomped to paste again.
>> Your libtard "Let's Vaccinate Our Way To World Depopulation By
>> Poisoning The Brown Countries Into Sterility" program has been exposed
>> as the ongoing libtard Sangeresque eugenics program that it is. Your
>> lie of libtards believing in civil rights has been exposed with the
>> truth of your party opposing every single major civil rights bill that
>> ever came to pass, and only bringing forward one such 'civil rights'
>> bill (such as it is) of their own (the 1990 ADA) which was merely a
>> rehash of older bills with niggling legalistic minutiae added... what
>> part of your kooky libtard ideology do you have left to cling to? Ah,
>> your touchy-feely "we want to *FEEL* good about ourselves and k'lame
>> that we're doing good... but we're far too stupid to come up with any
>> solutions that actually do good, and we're far too delusional to face
>> the reality that people should earn their way through life, rather
>> than turning them into defacto governmental slaves, little more than
>> domesticated pets dependent upon their government for their very
>> subsistence" libtard feelgoodisms... but I'm sure even you're smart
>> enough to figure out that's just pandering blather for the libtard
>> freeloaders, used by politicians to get votes.

> and THERE'S the conservative wingnut k0okyK0nspiracy!  are you an  
> anti-vaxxer nutbar?

Except there's no "conservative wingnut conspiracy", I've proven with
third-party links to corroborable proof that all of the above has
taken or is taking place, DildoRider. And you ran away from that
proof. Sucks to be you.

<snicker>

> here's hoping your kids get polio... D'OH! wait... NVM

Awww, ad hom from the ass-kicked kook who's gay, so he'll never have
kids. You're jealous that I have six incredible kids who all excel at
everything... hell, even my oldest kid makes more money than you,
outright owns two properties now and likely could kick your scrawny
ass, given that he's into Muay Thai. That's ok, I understand. You
libtards make yourselves feel better by tearing down those who are
successful (reference your "Eat The Rich" libtard blather). You've
been beaten by a kid... now you'll go even gayer and start hating
kids. LOL

>>> ...and then you woke up beside your imaginary "hawt wife".   
>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

>> You're jealous that I have a hot wife. I understand.

> how can i be jealous of something that doesn't exist, as far as i'm  
> concerned?

"as far as I'm concerned" LOL

"As far as you're concerned", anthropogenic global warming is real...
I've proven the planet has been cooling for 16 years and isn't
anywhere near being outside the regular temperature band that accounts
for solar and orbital forcing induced climate change.

"As far as you're concerned", libtards are responsible for every civil
rights bill ever put forward... I've proven they *opposed* every
single civil rights bill (they were and are the party of slavery, Jim
Crow, sharecropping, eugenics, denial of rights to minorities and
women, etc., after all) except one, and the conservatives have
advanced every single civil rights bill except that one, which the
conservatives also overwhelmingly supported.

Delusional moron. LOL

>> An ugly emo scarecrow such as yourself has trouble attracting
>> anything other than dudes.

> you seem to fancy yourself an expert on what gay dudes think, it seems.

Your further admission that you're a "gay dude" is noted, DildoRider.
Now you backpedal and blurt out that you're not gay, you suck dicks
*and* get rectally reamed by women with strap-on dildos, which means
you're "bisexual". LOL

>> Perhaps if you didn't hang out solely in gay bars, you'd meet a
>> hot woman too. Prolly not. You are pretty fucking fugly, after all.

> i rarely go to any bars, goofus.  hey, did you meet your hawt wife at  
> church?

Ah, so you go to those pride parades instead. Good of you to admit it.
LOL

>> And stoooopid.

> oh surely, or why else would you be compelled to publicly expose yourself  
> as dull fanged pseudointellectual.

You fucked up your grammar and capitalization above, DildoRider...
it's nearly always the case that kooks, in trying to claim someone
else to be stupid, fuck up in some manner. It's called a Freudian
slip, and you just made one.

<snicker>

>> And gay.

> anything else?

And stoooopid.
And gay.
And delusional.
And gay.
And moronic.
And gay.
And pwned.

And gay.

>> <snicker>

Now you bleat more, DildoRider.

<snicker>

-- 

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
(aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522640

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5b8s6lstm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:15:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>> care to explain why conservatives like you need "punching dummies".

>> It's a testosterone thing, DildoRider. You wouldn't understand.

> blaming it on your hormones again?

Blaming? Attributing. I'm proud to have a pair of balls. You,
apparently, are not, DildoRider. LOL

> that seems like something that you would claim that a woman
> would do, eh?

Riding a dildo seems like something a woman would do, DildoRider. LOL

> have you ever tried: self-control?

Says the guy who has so little control over his cock fetish that not
only does he ride as much cock as he can, but he makes his
"girlfriend" strap one on so he can get more time on point. LOL

>> You can content yourself with pretending you're breastfeeding dolls,
>> knitting and getting rectally reamed by your girlfriend, whom you turn
>> into a strap-on man to satisfy your cockfetish.

> is there ever a lull in your day where you aren't fantasizing about  
> caricatures of my sex life?

Your admission that your sex life is a caricature of normality is
noted, DildoRider. As are, apparently, your dildos. LOL

> how does the wifey feel about that, i wonder?  can you ask her for  
> me?

She's too busy laughing at the faggot who loves riding dildos. LOL

>>> have none of you never tried going up against the "real thing"?

>> You are a real punching dummy, DildoRider. LOL

> so, i guess you win before you even throw a punch eh?

Well, I always do win. I mean, look at you melting down now. LOL

> remember when i invited you over to demonstrate your fighting prowess
> after you intimated that you would be in pittsburgh and you
> chicken-shitted out of it?

I remember you got so flustered by mere words on a screen that you
were beating your little chicken chest and blathering big little-man
talk... and I noticed that all your curtains were drawn and no one
answered the door. LOL

> i know a guy who could work out a fighting contract for us.

Awww, are you so flustered by mere words on a screen that you're
beating your little chicken chest and blathering big little-man talk
again, DildoRider? You sure you want to go up against a guy who weighs
254 and power lifts? I'd turn your skinny little emo stick figure body
into a pretzel in about 15 seconds. But hey, any time you're down
Spring Valley way, let me know. You can be introduced to my own ring
and the beat-down of your life... as long as you sign the waiver of
liability. Get good dental insurance first, I don't use gloves.
<snicker>

> we could simul-cast it and post the stream URL here on
> AUK.  it would be the AUK "battel" of the decade...  BUT YOU WON'T.  LOL

I'm not in Pittsburgh, and you didn't answer your door when I was
there, DildoRider. You'll have to make a special trip to get your
beating. <snicker>

> sorry about your cowardice, dizumBoi.  i guess i'll just chalk it up in
> the "tough guy talking the talk yet refusing to walk the walk" category.

Says the guy hiding out in his house after beating his chicken chest
and talking big words. I walked right up to your door and knocked
loudly... and given that you're *always* bleating out your butthurt on
Usenet at all hours of the day and night because you're a nearly
unemployable little kooktard, odds are good that you were home and
just too scared-shitless to answer your door. <snicker>

>>> gad, you're dense.  the reason we got "terristed" was because of the
>>> notorious and celebrated inaction of conservative blowhard assholes
>>> similar to yourself ignoring a warning in august 2001.

>> <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/6/fitton-how-911-warnings-were-ignored/>
>>
>> Whoopsie... seems the Clinton administration ignored the warnings as
>> well...

> whoopsie... seems your conservatard masters didn't manage to affect any
> real difference from the previous administration.... well, except cheney  
> got to make billions off of the farcical war over WMDs that never were.

Whoopsie... you backpedaled and bleated again, DildoRider. LOL

>> now what will your little libtard brain do, DildoRider?

> i vote: laugh heartily at the pathetic goalpost-moving, gish galloper  

How is pointing out that long before Bush came into office, the
Clinton whitehouse knew of the impending attack, knew the names of the
hijackers and yet chose to do nothing "goalpost-moving", DildoRider?

> wasting his days away obsessively post-editing entire NEMO poasts.

You mean my programmatically reverting my text back to what I'd
originally written after he wasted his days away obsessively
post-editing entire FNVWe posts, DildoRider? Yeah, takes a few seconds
each post. That pwned kook will never free himself from that hook. LOL

>> Backpedal and bleat? Yeah, you'll backpedal and bleat. LOL

> yep.

Yep. You'll backpedal and bleat. And lamely try to post-edit. LOL

>>> pop quiz, hotshot... which one of us talks endlessly about their feet?

>> Says the guy mentioning feet.

> says the guy who did it about 4 times just yesterday in between his
> postings of vivid bestiality and anal sex fantasies on dozens of usenet  
> threads.

I see you're reading my every word, DildoRider... are you starting to
go into "creepy stalking nutjob" mode again, Emo DildoRider? LOL

> note the word: "their"...

Wow, DildoRider learned a new word. LOL

>> Again. So you obsess about cock so much

> are you going to note that you're always the one mentioning it.  LOL

I note you're the one always riding it, DildoRider. LOL

>> you turn your "girlfriend" into a strap-on dude so "she" can rectally
>> ream you, and you talk endlessly about feet. You've got some weird
>> fetishes, DildoRider. LOL

> why don't you tell us all about your "exotic" vanilla-flavored sex life?

Your tacit admission that you like black cock, noted. LOL

> how many bags of trash do you have to take out to the curb in order for
> your wife to reluctantly give you a hummer and roll back over and go to  
> sleep?  HAHAHA

As much as you obsess over normal people and what they do in their
bedrooms, you'd think you weren't a dildoriding weirdo who is so
cock-obsessed you ride it every chance you get, and when you can't do
that, you turn your "girlfriend" into a strap-on dude so you can ride
it even more, DildoRider... and covers up your being gay by k'laming
that since you ride cock *and* get reamed in the butt by strap-on
dildos worn by a "woman", that makes you "bisexual". LOL

>> No, close to the superhero I portrayed in a movie due to my incredible
>> physique. Keep guessing, Captain DildoRider.

> yes fakey, i know all about your movie "career".  it's astonishingly very
> similar to miss behan's; virtually non-existent when compared to actual  
> career actors.

That's because I'm not a "career actor"... unless you count my
voice-over credits. Acting is a huge voracious machine that claws
people into its maw, chews them up and spits them out with nothing. I
was smart enough to get out with my youth, sanity, looks, talent and a
shitload of money. Don't be jealous that I'm better than you,
DildoRider. LOL

> i find it surprising that you can manage to work in an industry that's  
> chock-full of liberals and homosexuals and trannies, (oh my).

I don't, except for voice-over work. And we generally don't talk
politics. Any time it comes up, I tell them to shut the fuck up and
act. I don't suffer libtard imbeciles gladly, Libtard Imbecile. LOL

> is that why you have to hide your true identity, bud?  afraid of being  
> blacklisted by the industry?

Nah, it's because obsessive little stalker creepo libtards like you
can't stand the truth... tap you upside your mushy skull with the
truth and you go all chest-beating big little-man words frothy. You
libtards just can't handle the truth, DildoRider. But it sure is fun
watching you run away from it and melt down because you know you can't
refute it. LOL

>>>>>> but you're apparently so cowed after having gotten your
>>>>>> stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by your Usenet Lord And  
>>>>>> Master that you don't dare do anything more than shed tears.

>>> ^ you forgot to type something here.

>> Why would I reply to myself, you witless nong?

> why would you just add in a blank line there, then?  i guess you
> must have caught yourself right before you might have faglamed
> yourself.  *whew*, close one.

There's a blank line between each paragraph, you witless tard. Are you
melting down badly, DildoRider? LOL

>>>> Wipe your tears, DildoRider. I've deconstructed your libtard lie of
>>>> global warming to such a point you've given up even trying to
>>>> promulgate that lie anymore. You don't dare try to argue your libtard
>>>> "Eat The Rich" blather for fear of getting stomped to paste again.
>>>> Your libtard "Let's Vaccinate Our Way To World Depopulation By
>>>> Poisoning The Brown Countries Into Sterility" program has been exposed
>>>> as the ongoing libtard Sangeresque eugenics program that it is. Your
>>>> lie of libtards believing in civil rights has been exposed with the
>>>> truth of your party opposing every single major civil rights bill that
>>>> ever came to pass, and only bringing forward one such 'civil rights'
>>>> bill (such as it is) of their own (the 1990 ADA) which was merely a
>>>> rehash of older bills with niggling legalistic minutiae added... what
>>>> part of your kooky libtard ideology do you have left to cling to? Ah,
>>>> your touchy-feely "we want to *FEEL* good about ourselves and k'lame
>>>> that we're doing good... but we're far too stupid to come up with any
>>>> solutions that actually do good, and we're far too delusional to face
>>>> the reality that people should earn their way through life, rather
>>>> than turning them into defacto governmental slaves, little more than
>>>> domesticated pets dependent upon their government for their very
>>>> subsistence" libtard feelgoodisms... but I'm sure even you're smart
>>>> enough to figure out that's just pandering blather for the libtard
>>>> freeloaders, used by politicians to get votes.

>>> and THERE'S the conservative wingnut k0okyK0nspiracy!  are you an
>>> anti-vaxxer nutbar?

>> Except there's no "conservative wingnut conspiracy", I've proven with
>> third-party links to corroborable proof that all of the above has
>> taken or is taking place, DildoRider. And you ran away from that
>> proof. Sucks to be you.

> i'm not convinced that there isn't a konservative wingnut konspiracy.  you  
> should maybe try harder, or perhaps yell "fag!" louder or more often.   
> that should help your cause.

It'd "help my cause" by making you melt down more? Who knew? LOL

>>> here's hoping your kids get polio... D'OH! wait... NVM

>> Awww, ad hom

> how's yer kids going to get polio, fakey?  no polio vaccines for the  
> fakeySpawn?

Awww, fan fic and ad hom... you really are melting down badly,
DildoRider. LOL

>> from the ass-kicked kook who's gay, so he'll never have
>> kids. You're jealous that I have six incredible kids who all excel at
>> everything...

> LOL, "everything" except having a sane father who isn't an unapologetic
> sociopath who chases trannies on usenet!

Your outright admission to being a tranny, noted. LOL

> tell me some more about your fear of vaccines.  are you a Christian  
> Scientist, or something like that?

You mean your wholly manufactured fanfic because you're melting down
badly, DildoRider? LOL

>> hell, even my oldest kid makes more money than you,
>> outright owns two properties now and likely could kick your scrawny
>> ass, given that he's into Muay Thai.

> i'd fight him.

You'd fight an 11 year old... and get your scrawny ass kicked. That
kid's got a wicked down roundhouse kick. I'm almost scared of him. LOL

> in fact, i'd fight most anybody who'd want to throw down.

Yeah... perturbed little kook is beating his little chicken chest and
bleating out big little-man words... nice meltdown, DildoRider. LOL

> i get lots of toughguys saying they'd spar but it just never happens, for  
> some reason.  perhaps it's just loudmouths who like to brag and when they  
> get called out publicly, they start crying out "you're trying to tear down  
> my success" while bragging about their muay thai golden boys:

Awwww, poor DildoRider... it wouldn't be a contest to see who could
take the deepest rectal probing, which you'd win hands down. It'd be a
bloodfest of kocked out teeth and your going to the hospital for a
concussion. You'd best curb your blather, or you're likely to find you
can't back it up... but hey, you've been invited, so get to buying
that Greyhound ticket, DildoRider... we all know that's all you can
afford. LOL

 That's ok, I understand. You
>> libtards make yourselves feel better by tearing down those who are
>> successful (reference your "Eat The Rich" libtard blather).

> i have yet to see any evidence of your "success".  just let me know when  
> you have some.  m'kay?

I have no need to show you anything, nor to brag about it. I discuss
it on occasion, but you being so butthurt you take any mention of
making more than your measly $75k/yr wage as bragging, DildoRider. LOL

>> You've been beaten by a kid...

> LOL, huh?  life's not a race, goof,

Bullshit. That's exactly what life it. It's a fucking race. The losers
try to say it's not, but you're losers. Who the fuck would listen to
you? LOL

> but here's hoping that you cross the finish line before me with
> waaay more money that you wasted your time collecting for your
> wife's next hubby to spend.

All the money my businesses earn will be equally distributed amongst
our kids, as they're equal shareholders in my corporations. The wife's
got her own business and doesn't need any of the money my businesses
earn. And if her business fails, she's got six kids to support her in
her old age, as do I... did I mention both our families tend to be
very long-lived? LOL

>> now you'll go even gayer and start hating kids. LOL

> you k'lame that you have 6 kids that you have had to burn your time and  
> money on... well, probably just money, since your time seems to be
> preoccupied with chasing trannies around on usenet

Your further admission that you're a tranny, noted. You're really not
any good at this, are you, DildoRider? LOL

> while the wife and kids are in bed. i bought a fixer-upper house
> to spend money on instead of kids.

And it's earned you a grand total of $36 / month for the whole time
you've owned it, and that's not taking into account maintenance and
upkeep... so you've lost money on that shitshack. You weren't even
smart enough to find a property that would appreciate as fast as
inflation, DildoRider? LOL

> same sort of "investment", IMO,

In your opinion. Except in 50 years or less, your house will be torn
down as a condemned eyesore, whereas my kids will continue building
the legacy I started. You'll die alone with no further family on your
branch of the family tree, whereas my kids and the generations after
them will become part of the financial elite. Your family tree turned
gay and died, while mine flourished. LOL

> except one of them shits, pisses, and pukes all over the place for a
> few years each and the other is a house, but i'm sure "hawt wife" had
> fun dealing with that while you were "playing" on usenet taking all
> of the credit for raising the little urchins.

Awww, your melty fanfic is so entertaining... you libtards who buy
into the whole "don't reproduce and kill the planet" libtard lie sure
do get butthurt when normal people tell you that having kids is the
most rewarding part of life... in fact, it's pretty much the only
reason for life... so you've been and will be useless, DildoRider. LOL

>> "as far as I'm concerned" LOL

> LOL.

Awww, are you post-editing again, Butthurt? LOL

Yeah, you are:
>> "As far as you're concerned", anthropogenic global warming is real...
>> I've proven the planet has been cooling for 16 years and isn't
>> anywhere near being outside the regular temperature band that accounts
>> for solar and orbital forcing induced climate change.

>> I've proven the planet has been cooling for 16 years and isn't
>> anywhere near being outside the regular temperature band that accounts
>> for solar and orbital forcing induced climate change.

> honestly from here, it just looks like you have a hardon for david deming,  
> hack geophysicist and notorius conservative party shill.

You've forgotten all that raw data I presented from NASA, NOAA, UK
Met, and RSS proving that the planet's been cooling for ~16 years,
DildoRider... but then, you've tried this particular lie before, and
got slapped to the ground for it, too. LOL

> david deming, the single purveyor of that touted "theory", is just another  
> conservative goof blindly projecting his own "moral mission" on the  
> sciences, like most of you goofs do unwittingly.
> 
> in the meantime, non-politically-connected scientists are out there
> gathering and analyzing data and it says otherwise.  imagine that.
> 
> http://climate.nasa.gov

So you want to be humiliated all over again with the raw data the
proves there are scientists within NASA, NOAA and UK Met who've been
caught lying... that measly 0.3% of scientists who are envirowhackos
and who lie and alter data to try to push their politically-driven
totalitarian agenda. You've already run from all this before,
DildoRider... do you think your sanity can stand another go through
the wringer? LOL

>> "As far as you're concerned", libtards are responsible for every civil
>> rights bill ever put forward... I've proven they *opposed* every
>> single civil rights bill (they were and are the party of slavery, Jim
>> Crow, sharecropping, eugenics, denial of rights to minorities and
>> women, etc., after all) except one, and the conservatives have
>> advanced every single civil rights bill except that one, which the
>> conservatives also overwhelmingly supported.
>>
>> Delusional moron. LOL

> oh sure! "everybody" knows that the solid south and the dixiecrats were
> just so excited to push through the civil rights act and give voting
> rights to their subjugated "whipping boy" class of citizens that they
> created via some 200 years of slavery and inhuman cruelty.  they were so
> excited, in fact, that the entire electorate forgot that they were  
> democrats after the civil rights era dust settled and they became staunch
> conservatives for the remainder of their lives just like their
> democrat/dixiecrat segregationist hero strom thurmond did.

Nicely lied / bleated, DildoRider... did you forget that I proved that
only 3 Dixiecrat politicians ever switched from Democrat to
Republican? Shall we let you get your stoooopid ass kicked on this
topic again, too? Because you've run away from reality on this, as
well. LOL

> i mean, who would blame them, with all of the splendid things that
> conservatives do for minorities and immigrants in recent times, especially
> below the mason-dixon.  right?
> </sarcasm>

You obviously have a problem with chronology, DildoRider... how could
these Dixiecrats have switched back then based upon "all of the
splendid things that conservatives do for minorities and immigrants in
recent times"? Oh, are you trying to lay the groundwork for another
libtard lie? You libtards are far too stupid to get away with that,
why do you even try? LOL

>>> you seem to fancy yourself an expert on what gay dudes think, it seems.

>> Your further admission that you're a "gay dude" is noted, DildoRider.

> except you and i weren't talking about me.

You were. I was laughing at you, DildoRider. LOL

> we are talking about the "gay dudes" in your imagination that you
> figure would screw anything that had a hole in it...

No, I was talking about the gay guy who's so cock-obsessed he'll ride
cock every chance he gets, and when he can't get that chance, he'll
make his "girlfriend" strap one on so he can get more pegboy
experience... all while k'laming that because he rides cocks *and*
gets reamed by a woman wearing a strap-on, that makes him "bisexual".
LOL

> because maybe you just might be one of those kinds of "dudes".

Your delusional and hopeful fanfic is hilarious, DildoRider. Nice
backpedal, BTW. LOL

>> Now you backpedal and blurt out that you're not gay, you suck dicks
>> *and* get rectally reamed by women with strap-on dildos, which means
>> you're "bisexual". LOL

> and all of that means

All that means is that you don't deny sucking dicks, Faggot. LOL

> that you are just another boring vanilla "str8" dude who can't
> seem to grasp that there's nothing wrong about consensual activities.

You fantasize about getting boned in the ass as you're taking a
strap-on dildo... and that's when you're not actually getting boned in
the ass... you're gay. You've admitted it. LOL

> all people are naturally bisexual, by the way.

Bullshit. That's another libtard lie as they try to sell the gay
agenda.

> people like you deal with your socially "taboo" bisexual thoughts
> by attacking bisexuals.  there are even people who have convinced
> themselves that they are homosexuals who display the exact same
> behavior of slandering bisexuals.

And then there are us red-blooded real men who find you nancy little
poofs to be a disgusting aberration, so we make fun of your
congenitally broken little brains. LOL

>> Ah, so you go to those pride parades instead. Good of you to admit it.
>> LOL

> nope, no parades either.  i don't have a strong desire to surround myself  
> with idiots.

Hence your life spent on Usenet. Way to catch yourself in yet another
lie, DildoRider. LOL

> where'd you meet your wife?  high school?  frat party?  mike davis'  
> russian bride website?  HAHAHA

Junior High. By the time we'd graduated, we'd already decided to get
married as soon as we both were 18. And it's been a dream life every
since... some people are just lucky like that, we get to meet that
perfect one. And some of you have to fuck a million frogs to find your
prince, DildoRider. LOL

>>> oh surely, or why else would you be compelled to publicly expose  
>>> yourself as dull fanged pseudointellectual.

>> You fucked up your grammar and capitalization above, DildoRider...

> faglames... ineffective... must use... grammar lames...</fakeyBrane>

Wow, you're melting down pretty badly, DildoRider. Was it something I
said? LOL

>> it's nearly always the case that kooks, in trying to claim someone
>> else to be stupid, fuck up in some manner. It's called a Freudian
>> slip, and you just made one.

> there's those dull fangs again... just gnawing and gnawing and getting
> nowhere.
> 
> your public admission that you are a dull-fanged pseudo-intellectual is
> hereby corroborated by your incessant grammar lames and faglames.

"dull fanged"... DildoRider wants guys to eat him. What a fag. LOL

Your public admission that you are a slow-witted dildoriding libtard
tranny faggot is perpetually corroborated by your incessant blathering
on about the gay mindset and various and sundry other fagsign. LOL

>>> anything else?

>> And stoooopid.
>> And gay.
>> And delusional.
>> And gay.
>> And moronic.
>> And gay.
>> And pwned.
>>
>> And gay.

> that's it?  i thought there'd be more fixation on your hatred of gays  
> because it reminds you of all of those rated-X fakeyFanfics that get you  
> hot and bothered...
> 
> there's definitely something else that you are withholding from the  
> discussion.  ;)

Speaking of fanfic... you seem to be blurting an awful lot of it...
perhaps because I've used truth and reality to drop-kick your retarded
ass across Usenet, and fanfic is all you've got left, DildoRider. LOL

>> Now you bleat more, DildoRider.

> it seems that you hear a lot of bleating, for some reason.

That'd be because you're bleating up a storm, DildoRider. LOL

-- 

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
(aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522642

.

how's it going buddy , are the kids getting fired up for halloween yet

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522651

Hey-
No problem!!
Let's all look at the Pentagon surveillance
videos that were never released

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522680

On 9/22/2015 2:37 AM, john wrote:
> Hey-
> No problem!!
> Let's all look at the Pentagon surveillance
> videos that were never released
>

Which is why you are already convinced of their contents.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522681

Why don't we know their contents?
Why are there no pictures of the
wreckage, bodies, etc?
If it's all good, why were all the
surveillance recordings of businesses
in the neighborhood confiscated?
What are they hiding?
Explain, Odd.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522778

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

%, in <news:8pndrm.o9b.19.1@news.alt.net> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> how's it going buddy , are the kids getting fired up for halloween yet

In some ways, no... in other ways, yes.

They don't eat much candy, so they have little incentive to
trick-or-treat. Not a big deal to them anyway, since they've not
developed a taste for sweets, they prefer fruit or veggies over sugary
sweets. Sweets make them sick to their stomach, much as eating fast
food makes me sick to my stomach... we're used to wholesome, healthy
food. Eating that processed shit will kill you. They'll be eating big
on All Saints' Day anyway.

But the fair will be going on during that time, so they'll get to go
and ride the rides and have fun there. The oldest will be putting on a
pocketbike display at the fair, along with some stunt riding
demonstrations. That should give his business a bit of publicity and
sales. The second oldest is going to be in a Kodokan Judo
demonstration at the fair, as well.

-- 

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
(aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522780 — The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change, Pt. 2

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5dbtfnstm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

Up all night frenetically toking on that crack pipe and wearing out
keyboards, DildoRider? Again? LOL

Why, it's so bad I have to split my reply up into three parts. You
sure bleated hard. SPNAK!

<snicker>

> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:07:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5b8s6lstm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:15:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Acting is a huge voracious machine that claws
>> people into its maw, chews them up and spits them out with nothing.

> those would be people who think that they will get by on their good looks  
> or wit for their entire lifetime.  i've run across some.  you're lucky you  
> aren't one of those losers.

I left the acting industry specifically because I'm not looking to
coast on my physique and good looks. I was smart enough to cash in and
get out.

>> I was smart enough to get out with my youth, sanity, looks, talent and a
>> shitload of money. Don't be jealous that I'm better than you,
>> DildoRider. LOL

> i really am happy for you.  no, seriously... big oafs like you have it  
> hard in this world where increased body mass equates to a shorter life  
> span.

Except my family has the genes to live extraordinarily long lives. But
your fanfic was nice. LOL

> i'm glad you didn't end up like fatty arbuckle... yet.

You mean lied about by foaming-at-the-mouth retards before being
vindicated and apologized to? LOL

>>> i find it surprising that you can manage to work in an industry that's
>>> chock-full of liberals and homosexuals and trannies, (oh my).

>> I don't, except for voice-over work. And we generally don't talk
>> politics. Any time it comes up, I tell them to shut the fuck up and
>> act. I don't suffer libtard imbeciles gladly, Libtard Imbecile. LOL

> that might become hard for your workmates to ignore someday, though.  what  
> if you completely lose it publicly and become a facebook meme or something?

Your wishful fanfic is getting more wild-eyed and desperate,
DildoRider. LOL

>>> is that why you have to hide your true identity, bud?  afraid of being
>>> blacklisted by the industry?

>> Nah, it's because obsessive little stalker creepo libtards like you
>> can't stand the truth... tap you upside your mushy skull with the
>> truth and you go all chest-beating big little-man words frothy. You
>> libtards just can't handle the truth, DildoRider. But it sure is fun
>> watching you run away from it and melt down because you know you can't
>> refute it. LOL

> oh, *i'm* the "stalker", am i?  LOL
> 
> history shows that you are the "best" at stalking.  i should bow to your  
> expertise, i suppose?

Stalker. LOL

>>>>>>>> but you're apparently so cowed after having gotten your
>>>>>>>> stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet by your Usenet Lord And
>>>>>>>> Master that you don't dare do anything more than shed tears.

>>>>> ^ you forgot to type something here.

>>>> Why would I reply to myself, you witless nong?

>>> why would you just add in a blank line there, then?  i guess you
>>> must have caught yourself right before you might have faglamed
>>> yourself.  *whew*, close one.

>> There's a blank line between each paragraph, you witless tard. Are you
>> melting down badly, DildoRider? LOL

> LOL
> 
> yeah, there's a blank line and your stupid algorithm leaves it as a blank  
> line instead of quoting it.  you probably can't figure out how to check  
> the quotation depth before and after the blank line and act accordingly.   
> it would take 20 seconds worth of thought and 5 seconds worth of noticing  
> that your quoting is fucked to begin with.
> 
> clearly, you can't figure out that if a quoted post has a carriage return,  
> you should attribute the carriage return to the previous poster by...  
> idunno... quoting it?
> 
> do you need a perl regex, or something?  i can help you fix it.

No idea what you're blathering on about, because it's not showing up
here... perhaps it's just your broken little libtard brain seeing
things again, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>>> Wipe your tears, DildoRider. I've deconstructed your libtard lie of
>>>>>> global warming to such a point you've given up even trying to
>>>>>> promulgate that lie anymore. You don't dare try to argue your libtard
>>>>>> "Eat The Rich" blather for fear of getting stomped to paste again.
>>>>>> Your libtard "Let's Vaccinate Our Way To World Depopulation By
>>>>>> Poisoning The Brown Countries Into Sterility" program has been  
>>>>>> exposed as the ongoing libtard Sangeresque eugenics program that it is.
>>>>>> Your lie of libtards believing in civil rights has been exposed with
>>>>>> the truth of your party opposing every single major civil rights bill  
>>>>>> that ever came to pass, and only bringing forward one such 'civil
>>>>>> rights' bill (such as it is) of their own (the 1990 ADA) which was
>>>>>> merely a rehash of older bills with niggling legalistic minutiae
>>>>>> added... what part of your kooky libtard ideology do you have left
>>>>>> to cling to? Ah, your touchy-feely "we want to *FEEL* good about
>>>>>> ourselves and k'lame that we're doing good... but we're far too
>>>>>> stupid to come up with any solutions that actually do good, and we're
>>>>>> far too delusional to face the reality that people should earn their
>>>>>> way through life, rather than turning them into defacto governmental
>>>>>> slaves, little more than domesticated pets dependent upon their
>>>>>> government for their very subsistence" libtard feelgoodisms... but
>>>>>> I'm sure even you're smart enough to figure out that's just
>>>>>> pandering blather for the libtard freeloaders, used by politicians
>>>>>> to get votes.

>> Who wrote this?

Are you suffering from dementia so badly that you've lost track of the
conversation between two people, DildoRider? LOL

>>>>> and THERE'S the conservative wingnut k0okyK0nspiracy!  are you an
>>>>> anti-vaxxer nutbar?

>> Why is this here?

Yeah, you're suffering from dementia so badly that you've lost track
of the conversation between two people, DildoRider. LOL

>>>> Except there's no "conservative wingnut conspiracy", I've proven with
>>>> third-party links to corroborable proof that all of the above has
>>>> taken or is taking place, DildoRider. And you ran away from that
>>>> proof. Sucks to be you.

>> What kind of broken quoting algorithm is this?

It shows up fine in my newsreader. Perhaps your broken little brain
just can't follow any conversation that involves more than the
multiple voices screaming in your head, DildoRider. LOL

>>> i'm not convinced that there isn't a konservative wingnut konspiracy.   
>>> you should maybe try harder, or perhaps yell "fag!" louder or more often.
>>> that should help your cause.

>> It'd "help my cause" by making you melt down more? Who knew? LOL

> you didn't, though.

Says the guy melting down. LOL

>>>>> here's hoping your kids get polio... D'OH! wait... NVM

>>>> Awww, ad hom

>>> how's yer kids going to get polio, fakey?  no polio vaccines for the
>>> fakeySpawn?

>> Awww, fan fic and ad hom... you really are melting down badly,
>> DildoRider. LOL

> tell me about the insidious plan to take over the world after developing  
> vaccines.

I've already proven that the vaccines used in third world countries is
contaminated with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HcG), a substance
that makes people sterile, a substance that couldn't have gotten into
those vaccines by mistake, and wouldn't survive in those vaccines
unless it was specifically linked to the vaccine by those who prepared
the vaccine, DildoRider. You ran away from all that proof, remember?

Message-ID: <3d84edcc2e82e4f6c4cdce3d94453504@dizum.com>

>>>> from the ass-kicked kook who's gay, so he'll never have
>>>> kids. You're jealous that I have six incredible kids who all excel at
>>>> everything...

>>> LOL, "everything" except having a sane father who isn't an unapologetic
>>> sociopath who chases trannies on usenet!

>> Your outright admission to being a tranny, noted. LOL

> yep.  your admission that you chase them is not lost in the mix, though.   
> ...with your wife in the room "laughing", no doubt.

Your outright admission to being a tranny, noted. LOL

>>> tell me some more about your fear of vaccines.  are you a Christian
>>> Scientist, or something like that?

>> You mean your wholly manufactured fanfic because you're melting down
>> badly, DildoRider? LOL

> i'm just asking questions that you seem to be unable to answer.  who  
> knew?  fakey with no smart-ass remark about his fear of vaccines.

Awwww, you're building more fanfic upon the fanfic you've already
spewed, DildoRider. Melt down much? LOL

>>>> hell, even my oldest kid makes more money than you,
>>>> outright owns two properties now and likely could kick your scrawny
>>>> ass, given that he's into Muay Thai.

>>> i'd fight him.

>> You'd fight an 11 year old... and get your scrawny ass kicked. That
>> kid's got a wicked down roundhouse kick. I'm almost scared of him. LOL

> get back to me in 7 years, then.  he's not old enough to sign any legal  
> documents and get his ass beat because of his loudmouth dad.

And yet, even at 11 years old, he'd leave you a sobbing, crumpled,
bleeding mess. The boy's relentless. He's got that youthful boundless
energy such that he can keep up a sustained attack that makes even
grown men cringe. LOL

I can't imagine how awesome that boy's gonna be when he's 18. Makes a
father proud... not that you'd know, DildoRider. LOL

>>> in fact, i'd fight most anybody who'd want to throw down.

>> Yeah... perturbed little kook is beating his little chicken chest and
>> bleating out big little-man words... nice meltdown, DildoRider. LOL

> says the k0ok who pretends to have come to people's houses in the same  
> post where he calls that person a "stalker".
> 
> i'd say something has you flustered, elby's big boy.

Stalker. LOL

>>> i get lots of toughguys saying they'd spar but it just never happens,  
>>> for some reason.  perhaps it's just loudmouths who like to brag and when  
>>> they get called out publicly, they start crying out "you're trying to tear  
>>> down my success" while bragging about their muay thai golden boys:

>> Awwww, poor DildoRider... it wouldn't be a contest to see who could
>> take the deepest rectal probing, which you'd win hands down.

> you've been thinking about anal sex so much... you should ask wifey if you  
> can have a go at the back door.  if she shaves or waxes off her butthole  
> hairs, she's probably game.  just ask her.  it might make for a good night  
> for you both.

Wow, your fanfic gets more demented the more insane you're driven,
DildoRider. LOL

Does your "girlfriend" have "butthole hairs", DildoRider? That's a
dude. LOL

>> It'd be a bloodfest of knocked out teeth and your going to the hospital
>> for a concussion.

> would that be like how you "showed up at my house"?

I note that despite your continuing to blather about this topic,
you've not provided any links to any of your supposed security system
videos, DildoRider. If you had them, you'd have posted them by now.
LOL

>> You'd best curb your blather, or you're likely to find you
>> can't back it up... but hey, you've been invited, so get to buying
>> that Greyhound ticket, DildoRider... we all know that's all you can
>> afford. LOL

> i can afford whatever i want... an exhausting bus tour to your shithole  
> gym isn't one of those things, though.

Translation:
"I'm just spewing words. I can't back any of it up because I'm a
fucking coward. I'd rather be known as a pauper who can't afford a bus
ticket than a coward, though." LOL

>>>> That's ok, I understand. You libtards make yourselves feel better by
>>>> tearing down those who are successful (reference your "Eat The Rich"
>>>> libtard blather).

>>> i have yet to see any evidence of your "success".  just let me know when
>>> you have some.  m'kay?

>> I have no need to show you anything, nor to brag about it.

> LOL, really???  your claims of being better than everybody are all but  
> transparent.

Those statements of fact aren't bragging, DildoRider. That you're so
inferior (and you know it) that you take them as bragging is proof
that you're jealous. LOL

>> I discuss it on occasion, but you being so butthurt you take any
>> mention of making more than your measly $75k/yr wage as bragging,
>> DildoRider. LOL

> you "on occasion" chase trannies around usenet that you have claimed to  
> have visited IRL...

Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted, Robert Michael
Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA. LOL

>>>> You've been beaten by a kid...

>>> LOL, huh?  life's not a race, goof,

>> Bullshit. That's exactly what life it.

> i hope you win, then!

I already have. Now it's my job to ensure my kids win more than I did.
Not that you'd know anything about that. You're gay. LOL

>> It's a fucking race. The losers try to say it's not, but you're losers.
>> Who the fuck would listen to you? LOL

> perhaps it has something to do with your admitted testosterone imbalance.

You mean your fanfic blather admitting you have no balls, DildoRider?
LOL

>>> but here's hoping that you cross the finish line before me with
>>> waaay more money that you wasted your time collecting for your
>>> wife's next hubby to spend.

>> All the money my businesses earn will be equally distributed amongst
>> our kids, as they're equal shareholders in my corporations. The wife's
>> got her own business and doesn't need any of the money my businesses
>> earn. And if her business fails, she's got six kids to support her in
>> her old age, as do I... did I mention both our families tend to be
>> very long-lived? LOL

> that sucks for your kids.

That's the way old-world families work. For the poor, I'm sure it does
suck, as the parents drag down the kids right at the time they're
trying to get ahead. For those who are financially independent, the
kids are already ahead. They can afford to give back because the
parents gave to them to begin with. It's a synergy, and it's the
reason so many immigrant families can come to the US and become
wealthy in a few generations, whereas USians tend to perpetuate
whatever lot in life the parents had.

>>>> now you'll go even gayer and start hating kids. LOL

>>> you k'lame that you have 6 kids that you have had to burn your time and
>>> money on... well, probably just money, since your time seems to be
>>> preoccupied with chasing trannies around on usenet

>> Your further admission that you're a tranny, noted.

> have you not been to my femme okcupid profile?  i'm ABSOLUTELY SURE that  
> you would LOVE it.

I'm not gay, so no on all counts, DildoRider. LOL

But I do note you're now using dating sites to get more cock,
CockAddict. You've admitted it. Does your "girlfriend" know? LOL

>> You're really not any good at this, are you, DildoRider? LOL

> you're really good at calling people what they are and expecting it will  
> hurt them as much as it would hurt you, when in reality that's not how it  
> works.

Is that why you're bleating up a storm, fan-fic'ing to beat the band,
talking loudly about fighting because you're so perturbed then
backpedaling when called on it because you're a fucking coward, and
melting down badly, DildoRider? LOL

>>> while the wife and kids are in bed. i bought a fixer-upper house
>>> to spend money on instead of kids.

>> And it's earned you a grand total of $36 / month for the whole time
>> you've owned it, and that's not taking into account maintenance and
>> upkeep...

> and you're counting the rent for all of my roommates i've had over the  
> years, as well?

Then you didn't have "all that space" at your disposal, now did you?
Retard just got caught in another lie. LOL

>> so you've lost money on that shitshack.

> yeah, i could see how some idiot like yourself could make a bunch of  
> uninformed assumptions and make some calculations based on horribly  
> incorrect information found at websites that google steered you toward.

You mean the sites that show how much you've paid in property taxes,
the value of the property, how much you paid for the property... all
showing you paid too much for a shitshack half-a-house that had little
appreciation potential, to the extent it couldn't even appreciate at a
rate that outpaced inflation? Yeah, that math, it always eludes you
libtards. LOL

Now, why were you bragging about how much you'd "made" on that
property again, DildoRider? LOL

>> You weren't even smart enough to find a property that would appreciate
>> as fast as inflation, DildoRider? LOL

> again, i wasn't buying to make a buck.  i was buying to live in a house  
> instead of a 3br rental shithole for $1200 a month in a neighborhood full  
> of equal parts screaming kids and stuffy old fucks with nothing to do but  
> complain about every single neighbor to me.

So you were stupid enough to buy to lose a buck. And you wonder why
you're financially limited. LOL

>>> same sort of "investment", IMO,

>> In your opinion. Except in 50 years or less, your house will be torn
>> down as a condemned eyesore,

> in 50 years i might be dead.  who cares?  i won't need a house then, will  
> i?

And in 50 years, you also won't have any kids. So you're a selfish
prick who only thinks of himself. Got it. LOL

>> whereas my kids will continue building the legacy I started.

> more pointless bragging.

Who's bragging? Discussing the relevant facts isn't bragging except to
those who are so low in society they see success as something
unattainable to them, and thus something to be jealous about. IOW,
you. LOL

> i've seen first hand a few times what happens when kids inherit the family
> business.  it's usually a regular shit-show. at least you won't be around
> for that embarrassment.

Except my kids will have their own businesses, so there won't be any
lower class squabbling about the remainder of my estate. They'll
already have money of their own and experience in managing it. They'll
simply divide the spoils equitably, fold those assets into their own
portfolios, and continue on. Only low-rents squabble over money,
DildoRider. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522783 — The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change, Pt.1

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5dbtfnstm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

Up all night frenetically toking on that crack pipe and wearing out
keyboards, DildoRider? Again? LOL

Why, it's so bad I have to split my reply up into three parts. You
sure bleated hard. SPNAK!

Your reply was 1355 lines. The grand total (minus repeated attribution
lines and hilarious .sig) for my three replies (so the remailer will
deliver them) is 1558 lines. So in a mere 156 lines net, I drop-kick
you across Usenet yet again. Sucks to be you, DildoRider.

<snicker>

> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:07:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5b8s6lstm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:15:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>>> care to explain why conservatives like you need "punching dummies".

>>>> It's a testosterone thing, DildoRider. You wouldn't understand.

>>> blaming it on your hormones again?

>> Blaming? Attributing. I'm proud to have a pair of balls. You,
>> apparently, are not, DildoRider. LOL

> your admittedly raging

Your fanfic about "raging" is noted. That you have more estrogen than
testosterone is noted. Your lack of a pair of balls, noted.

> testosterone (and excessive oafish size) is probably going to be
> what does your ticker in eventually, i suppose, so  
> you might as well embrace it.

Except my family has the long-life gene. We live into triple digits if
we don't get killed in accidents. Oh, I'm big, strong, handsome,
wealthy, blessed with a great family and I'll outlive you by decades.
LOL

>>> that seems like something that you would claim that a woman
>>> would do, eh?

>> Riding a dildo seems like something a woman would do, DildoRider. LOL

> ...and we all know about those "things that women do" and how you should  
> fear them, being the big tough, testosterone-oozing ironic chickenshit  
> that you play dress up as in movies and on usenet to over-compensate for.

Bwahahaaa! Oh man I've got you so foot-stompingly pissed you're just
blathering out nonsensical shit now. Was it something I said,
DildoRider? Seriously. LOL

>>> have you ever tried: self-control?

>> Says the guy who has so little control over his

> wait for it...

Yeah... that's your defining feature, DildoRider. You love it so much
you bragged about it online to perfect strangers. LOL

>> cock fetish

> would that lead one to feel compelled to bring up "cock" at every  
> opportunity if they were afflicted with that malady?

Says the guy who bragged about loving cock so much that when he
couldn't get it, he turned his "girlfriend" into a strap-on dude so he
could ride fakecock while fantasizing about the real thing... and in
so doing, admitted he was utterly, thoroughly, completely
cock-obsessed and gay. LOL

>> that not only does he ride as much cock as he can, but he makes his
>> "girlfriend" strap one on so he can get more time on point. LOL

> oh, so *now* i have a sex life?  you were just telling me that i couldn't  
> possibly, based on your statistical data and personal experiences with gay  
> guys.

MID? No? Oh, you're bleating so hard you're spewing whatever lies
float to the surface of your septic tank mind, DildoRider. LOL

>>>> You can content yourself with pretending you're breastfeeding dolls,
>>>> knitting and getting rectally reamed by your girlfriend, whom you turn
>>>> into a strap-on man to satisfy your cockfetish.

>>> is there ever a lull in your day where you aren't fantasizing about
>>> caricatures of my sex life?

>> Your admission that your sex life is a caricature of normality is
>> noted, DildoRider. As are, apparently, your dildos. LOL

> a caricature of normality would exaggerate the parts of normality that  
> distinguish it as "normal"... like vanilla ice cream, reluctant wifey  
> trading chores for blowjobs, and pretending that knocking up someone is  
> some kind of "miracle".
> 
> doesn't seem like you understand that concept, though.

Sure I do. Your sex-life caricature is that you're so obsessed with
cock that when you can't get cock, you force your "girlfriend" to wear
a strap-on and rectally ream you with caricature-sized strap-on dildos
as you fantasize about cocks, DildoRider. You've admitted it. LOL

>>> how does the wifey feel about that, i wonder?  can you ask her for
>>> me?

>> She's too busy laughing at the faggot who loves riding dildos. LOL

> uh-huh.  LOL  just like you came to my house, eh?  right.  she's there  
> with you watching you chase trannies around usenet while your precious  
> wunderkinds sleep just down the hall.  yeah, i totally believe that.  LOL

Your on-going admission that you're a tranny, noted. LOL

>>>>> have none of you never tried going up against the "real thing"?

>>>> You are a real punching dummy, DildoRider. LOL

>>> so, i guess you win before you even throw a punch eh?

>> Well, I always do win. I mean, look at you melting down now. LOL

> how's that working for you?

Well, I always do win. I mean, look at you melting down now. LOL

>>> remember when i invited you over to demonstrate your fighting prowess
>>> after you intimated that you would be in pittsburgh and you
>>> chicken-shitted out of it?

>> I remember you got so flustered by mere words on a screen that you
>> were beating your little chicken chest and blathering big little-man
>> talk... and I noticed that all your curtains were drawn and no one
>> answered the door. LOL

> lies.
> 
> i would have gotten an email with a link to footage of your oafish ass  
> peering through windows around my house.

You'll be posting some evidence of this "footage" you k'lame you've
got... like some poor deluded lying cock-obsessed lower-middle-class
worker bee is going to outfit his shitshack half-a-house with a
security system complete with cameras... you couldn't even afford to
pay off your college loan for the education you didn't get, for 15
years. LOL

So... let's see these videos, DildoRider. Otherwise, you've been
caught lying just as you were caught lying about your "rich" parents.
LOL

> also, my neighbors would have likely seen a big oaf nosing around and
> mentioned it to me.  nice try at backpedaling, chickenshit.

"Likely seen". LOL

I stood on your porch for a good 10 minutes knocking on the door, so
let's see that video, DildoRider. No? Oh, you've just been caught in
yet another lie. If you had *any* video from your k'lamed security
system, you'd have posted a link to it on YouTube or somesuch. You
didn't, because you're lying again. I saw no cameras in surveilling
the property. LOL

> it was about that property you mentioned, right?  how'd that go?

Didn't buy it. The owner didn't reveal beforehand the extent of the
work required to make it rentable. It wouldn't have been profitable.

>>> i know a guy who could work out a fighting contract for us.

>> Awww, are you so flustered by mere words on a screen that you're
>> beating your little chicken chest and blathering big little-man talk
>> again, DildoRider?

> it's just a fight, dude.  we can do it all professional-like.

Ok, book a flight, DildoRider. If you're so perturbed by mere words on
a screen that you're willing to travel to lose teeth, then you've got
what's coming to you. LOL

>> You sure you want to go up against a guy who weighs
>> 254 and power lifts?

> i am absolutely sure that you do not intimidate me.  you can power lift  
> all you want, it ain't gonna make you fast.  the more weight you have, the  
> more i'll use it against you by forcing you off balance and misdirecting.   
> you don't even know if i'm left or right handed or ambidextrous, so i'd  
> use that against you as well.

Yeah, trying to wrestle me is a bit like trying to wrestle a Mack
truck, DildoRider. No matter how much faster you think you are, you
can't beat sheer power. The first chance I get, I'll grab your skinny
little forearm and squeeze until blood vessels burst. You've just lost
use of one hand. Once I get ahold of a guy, he starts screaming in
pain and fear. LOL

> let's just say i've not been in a single fight my whole life that lasted  
> more than 30 seconds, and i walked away from every one with cuts on my  
> knuckles from some goof's broken teeth puncturing their lip or cheek.

Awwww, you won't get that chance. You'll be unconscious before you're
able to throw one punch, DildoRider. LOL

But your big little-man blather is noted as your becoming so perturbed
by mere words on a screen that you're foot-stomping up a storm and
screaming in impotent rage. LOL

>> I'd turn your skinny little emo stick figure body
>> into a pretzel in about 15 seconds.

> oh look, it's "the big man talk" triggered by some words on a screen.   
> somebody was just talking about this phenomenon...

Statements of fact aren't "big man talk", DildoRider. LOL

>> But hey, any time you're down Spring Valley way, let me know.

> no idea where that is, nor do i care.

And the backpedaling begins. LOL

> i invited you here twice

Twice? MIDs? Or did you merely blather twice in the same time frame?
LOL

> and i'm calling it that you chicken shitted out twice.  once, you actually claimed  
> you were here, "but the video says "that's a lie""</maury>.

You'll be posting videos to prove you have this k'lamed security
system, DildoRider... that you've not done so is proof enough that you
don't. If you did, you'd have posted the videos already. LOL

Now DildoRider will be forced to duct-tape a video camera up on his
porch ceiling and take a short video. LOL

Let's see you post a video date-stamped with the date in question, or
anywhere near that date, DildoRider. Bet you can't. LOL

>> You can be introduced to my own ring
>> and the beat-down of your life...

> ring?  i have an uneven concrete parking lot out back with lots of random  
> shale and debris on it.  what's wrong with that?  i thought you were  
> "tough"?

The ring is for training. If you prefer, you can start bleeding
anywhere. Just show up, DildoRider. LOL

>> as long as you sign the waiver of
>> liability. Get good dental insurance first,

> get it?  i've had it for 2 decades.

Oh good. Then all you have to do is book a flight. Get right on that.
Or admit you're a chickenshit loud-mouth who'd much prefer to get his
teeth knocked out by cocks than by fists. LOL

>> I don't use gloves.

> yeah, i don't either.  a waiver of liability would definitely be signed.   
> one of my best friends and neighbors is a notary public.  not a problem.   
> you just have to come here, you know, like how you originally ran away?

I already went there, DildoRider. You cowered in your hovel and didn't
answer the door. I'm not in Pittsburgh, and given that you're the one
so perturbed that you're trying to pick a fight with a Mack truck,
you'll be the one doing the traveling, or you'll admit you're just
spewing braggadocio to assuage your butthurt over mere words on a
screen. LOL

>>> we could simul-cast it and post the stream URL here on
>>> AUK.  it would be the AUK "battel" of the decade...  BUT YOU WON'T.  LOL

>> I'm not in Pittsburgh,

> no shit, sherlock.

Yeah, which means your being the one perturbed to impotent
foot-stomping means you'll be the one traveling, DildoRider. Bring a
zip-lock bag. You'll need it for various teeth and body parts. LOL

>> and you didn't answer your door when I was there, DildoRider.

> LOL, you weren't here, liar.  what was the date and time you claim to have  
> knocked on my door?  i'll go back through the security cam archives and  
> check that day's folder.  just a warning: if it's there, i'm posting the  
> captures here for all of your usenet "fans" to see.  and well, once that  
> gets out and people figure out who you are... the fun begins.

You know the date span I was in Pittsburgh. Get to posting your
k'lamed video, DildoRider... there were no cameras on your hovel's
porch. LOL

>> You'll have to make a special trip to get your beating. <snicker>

> i don't waste fuel and pollute by traveling needlessly.  let's just say  
> that i invited you here twice and you weaseled your way out of it twice,  
> "toughguy".  m'kay?

Now he's backpedaling and using the "I'm an eco-weenie" excuse.
Pathetic. LOL

Where's that video, DildoRider? If you had it, you'd have posted it.
LOL

>>> sorry about your cowardice, dizumBoi.  i guess i'll just chalk it up in
>>> the "tough guy talking the talk yet refusing to walk the walk" category.

>> Says the guy hiding out in his house after beating his chicken chest
>> and talking big words. I walked right up to your door and knocked
>> loudly...

> why not the doorbell?  also, you could have just emailed or called me.   
> i'm not home *always*, dingus.  i know you can find my number, you're a  
> regular expert with google-stalking once you know someone's address and  
> full name because they gave it to you.

I never use the doorbell. A knock suffices and works every time.
Sometimes doorbells don't work, especially in run-down shitshack
half-a-house hovels. LOL

You're home nearly always, apparently, given your non-stop
bleatfarting. And yet, there was no answer, despite the fact that a
shitty Honda Accord beater was parked in the driveway... apparently
you're so retarded you had to paint "DRIVEWAY" across your driveway,
too. LOL

>> and given that you're *always* bleating out your butthurt on
>> Usenet at all hours of the day and night because you're a nearly
>> unemployable little kooktard, odds are good that you were home and
>> just too scared-shitless to answer your door. <snicker>

> LOL.  nice try, sociopath!
> 
> i could have been anywhere depending on what time it was.  most people try  
> to give a head's up before they go a-visiting.  were you born in a barn?

Awww, DildoRider's so perturbed he's mixing his metaphors. LOL

>>>>> gad, you're dense.  the reason we got "terristed" was because of the
>>>>> notorious and celebrated inaction of conservative blowhard assholes
>>>>> similar to yourself ignoring a warning in august 2001.

>>>> <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/6/fitton-how-911-warnings-were-ignored/>
>>>>
>>>> Whoopsie... seems the Clinton administration ignored the warnings as
>>>> well...

>>> whoopsie... seems your conservatard masters didn't manage to affect any
>>> real difference from the previous administration.... well, except cheney
>>> got to make billions off of the farcical war over WMDs that never were.

>> Whoopsie... you backpedaled and bleated again, DildoRider. LOL

> i didn't vote for clinton.

You voted for Ross Perot? No wonder he was talking about a "giant
sucking sound". LOL

>>>> now what will your little libtard brain do, DildoRider?

>>> i vote: laugh heartily at the pathetic goalpost-moving, gish galloper

>> How is pointing out that long before Bush came into office, the
>> Clinton whitehouse knew of the impending attack, knew the names of the
>> hijackers and yet chose to do nothing "goalpost-moving", DildoRider?

> i didn't vote for clinton.

See above, Giant Sucking Sound. LOL

>>> wasting his days away obsessively post-editing entire NEMO poasts.

>> You mean my programmatically reverting my text back to what I'd
>> originally written after he wasted his days away obsessively
>> post-editing entire FNVWe posts, DildoRider? Yeah, takes a few seconds
>> each post. That pwned kook will never free himself from that hook. LOL

> sounds like wasted time to me... at least you're trying to moderate  
> yourself, though.  that's commendable.

I'm not spending a lot of time on the tard. But his being forced to
spend days to my minutes is pretty funny. LOL

>>>> Backpedal and bleat? Yeah, you'll backpedal and bleat. LOL

>>> yep.

>> Yep. You'll backpedal and bleat. And lamely try to post-edit. LOL

> post-editing IS lame isn't it... i wonder why I do it so often?  ;)

You might do it so often because you're butthurt, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>> pop quiz, hotshot... which one of us talks endlessly about their feet?

After letting DildoRider blather on about feet for a couple days, I'll
now note I've been discussing kicking kooktards with steel-toed boots,
whereas DildoRider's been wanking furiously about feet. SPNAK! LOL

>>>> Says the guy mentioning feet.

>>> says the guy who did it about 4 times just yesterday in between his
>>> postings of vivid bestiality and anal sex fantasies on dozens of usenet
>>> threads.

>> I see you're reading my every word, DildoRider... are you starting to
>> go into "creepy stalking nutjob" mode again, Emo DildoRider? LOL

> if it bothers you, I could always find something to talk about that  
> isn't cock, anal sex, bestiality, etc...

There you go again, talking about your sex life. LOL

>>> note the word: "their"...

>> Wow, DildoRider learned a new word. LOL

> lame.

As lame as a spaeling laim, DildoRider? LOL

>>>> Again. So you obsess about cock so much

>>> are you going to note that you're always the one mentioning it.  LOL

>> I note you're the one always riding it, DildoRider. LOL

> IKYABWAI lame.

IKYABWAI truth. There's a difference, DildoRider. LOL

>>>> you turn your "girlfriend" into a strap-on dude so "she" can rectally
>>>> ream you, and you talk endlessly about feet. You've got some weird
>>>> fetishes, DildoRider. LOL

>>> why don't you tell us all about your "exotic" vanilla-flavored sex life?

>> Your tacit admission that you like black cock, noted. LOL

> once again, you unsurprisingly ruminate on cock...

IKIABWAY noted, CockAddict. LOL

>>> how many bags of trash do you have to take out to the curb in order for
>>> your wife to reluctantly give you a hummer and roll back over and go to
>>> sleep?  HAHAHA

>> As much as you obsess over normal people and what they do in their
>> bedrooms,

> what's normal about being an emotionally unavailable and disrespectful  
> douchebag to your wife?

Awwww, your fanfic just gets better and better, DildoRider. You're
jealous. LOL

>> you'd think you weren't a dildoriding weirdo who is so
>> cock-obsessed you ride it every chance you get, and when you can't do
>> that, you turn your "girlfriend" into a strap-on dude so you can ride
>> it even more, DildoRider... and covers up your being gay by k'laming
>> that since you ride cock *and* get reamed in the butt by strap-on
>> dildos worn by a "woman", that makes you "bisexual". LOL

> more glimpses into your depraved S&M dungeon of a skull.  something is  
> surely awry if you think and then post publicly about those things while  
> claiming to be "straight".

Says the guy living what I'm merely pointing and laughing at. Says the
guy who posted publicly about turning his "girlfriend" into a strap-on
boyfriend so he could get rectally reamed, when he was unable to get
reamed by the real thing... then backpedaled and bleated that because
he got buttfucked by dudes *and* by a woman with a strap-on, that made
him "bisexual", not gay. LOL

>>> yes fakey, i know all about your movie "career".  it's astonishingly  
>>> very similar to miss behan's; virtually non-existent when compared to actual
>>> career actors.

>> That's because I'm not a "career actor"...

> well, obviously.  LOLOL

>> unless you count my
>> voice-over credits.

> i don't think anybody counts voice-overs.  you *do* have the perfect face  
> for radio or voice-overs, though...  maybe you should have taken better  
> care of your face in the past?

Says the guy so perturbed he's bleating fanfic, who has no idea what I
look like. They don't give leading roles to superhero movies to ugly
dudes, DildoRider. I note you've never gotten such a role. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522785 — The Top Lies and Deceptions of Loose Change, Pt. 3

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5dbtfnstm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

Up all night frenetically toking on that crack pipe and wearing out
keyboards, DildoRider? Again? LOL

Why, it's so bad I have to split my reply up into three parts. You
sure bleated hard. SPNAK!

<snicker>

> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:07:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5b8s6lstm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:15:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> You'll die alone with no further family on your branch of the family tree,

> again, who cares?  we all die alone, dummy.

So you're a selfish prick who only thinks of and lives for himself.
Got it. LOL

>> whereas my kids and the generations after
>> them will become part of the financial elite.

> i hope they have a great time with the destroyed planet you had hoped to  
> leave for them due to your being a shill for conservative  
> anti-climate-change pro-koch-industries bleating.

"destroyed planet" LOL

You enviro-whackadoodles have been bleating that same shit since 1847
(yeah, eighteen forty seven... look it up). You've never been right,
you'll never be right. That's because you're delusional libtards. LOL

>> Your family tree turned gay and died, while mine flourished. LOL

> i'm not obligated to produce more human beings.

So you're a selfish prick who only thinks about and lives for himself.
Got it. LOL

> i also wouldn't be caught trying to take credit for entire subsequent
> future generations for simply squirting some goo onto a target.

You couldn't anyway. You're gay. You've admitted it. LOL

> here's hoping one of your great-grandkids is a demented mass-murderer or a  
> rapist and you can take credit for that too.

Wow, you are so butthurt you're spewing bleaty fanfic about
non-existent future generations. LOL

>>> except one of them shits, pisses, and pukes all over the place for a
>>> few years each and the other is a house, but i'm sure "hawt wife" had
>>> fun dealing with that while you were "playing" on usenet taking all
>>> of the credit for raising the little urchins.

>> Awww, your melty fanfic is so entertaining... you libtards who buy
>> into the whole "don't reproduce and kill the planet" libtard lie sure
>> do get butthurt when normal people tell you that having kids is the
>> most rewarding part of life... in fact, it's pretty much the only
>> reason for life... so you've been and will be useless, DildoRider. LOL

> when the world looks like the movie idiocracy, we can all thank people  
> like you fakey.

That you base your entire life upon an idiotic movie is noted. That
you're the uptight libtard in that movie is further noted. LOL

>>>> "as far as I'm concerned" LOL

>>> LOL.

>> Awww, are you post-editing again, Butthurt? LOL

> you do it incessantly... are you incessantly butthurt, then?

Not me. I just revert the text you butthurt kooks text-edit, then
point and laugh. LOL

>>>> "As far as you're concerned", anthropogenic global warming is real...
>>>> I've proven the planet has been cooling for 16 years and isn't
>>>> anywhere near being outside the regular temperature band that accounts
>>>> for solar and orbital forcing induced climate change.

>>> honestly from here, it just looks like you have a hardon for david  
>>> deming, hack geophysicist and notorius conservative party shill.

>> You've forgotten all that raw data I presented from NASA, NOAA, UK
>> Met, and RSS proving that the planet's been cooling for ~16 years,
>> DildoRider... but then, you've tried this particular lie before, and
>> got slapped to the ground for it, too. LOL

> never looked at your gish gallop.  if you were smart you could probably  
> find a way to convince me, but you're only a mere pseudo-intellectual with  
> a PhD in "googling".

Translation:
"I ran away from all the proof because it utterly destroyed my kooky
little libtard lie of a life." LOL

>>> david deming, the single purveyor of that touted "theory", is just  
>>> another conservative goof blindly projecting his own "moral mission"
>>> on the sciences, like most of you goofs do unwittingly.
>>>
>>> in the meantime, non-politically-connected scientists are out there
>>> gathering and analyzing data and it says otherwise.  imagine that.
>>>
>>> http://climate.nasa.gov

>> So you want to be humiliated all over again with the raw data the
>> proves there are scientists within NASA, NOAA and UK Met who've been
>> caught lying... that measly 0.3% of scientists who are envirowhackos
>> and who lie and alter data to try to push their politically-driven
>> totalitarian agenda. You've already run from all this before,
>> DildoRider... do you think your sanity can stand another go through
>> the wringer? LOL

> no denial about the deming hardon, i notice.

You mean your fanfic? LOL

> what does the wife think of that?  is she jealous?

Why would my wife be jealous that you're a fan-fic spewing libtard,
DildoRider? LOL

>>>> "As far as you're concerned", libtards are responsible for every civil
>>>> rights bill ever put forward... I've proven they *opposed* every
>>>> single civil rights bill (they were and are the party of slavery, Jim
>>>> Crow, sharecropping, eugenics, denial of rights to minorities and
>>>> women, etc., after all) except one, and the conservatives have
>>>> advanced every single civil rights bill except that one, which the
>>>> conservatives also overwhelmingly supported.
>>>>
>>>> Delusional moron. LOL

>>> oh sure! "everybody" knows that the solid south and the dixiecrats were
>>> just so excited to push through the civil rights act and give voting
>>> rights to their subjugated "whipping boy" class of citizens that they
>>> created via some 200 years of slavery and inhuman cruelty.  they were so
>>> excited, in fact, that the entire electorate forgot that they were
>>> democrats after the civil rights era dust settled and they became  
>>> staunch conservatives for the remainder of their lives just like their
>>> democrat/dixiecrat segregationist hero strom thurmond did.

>> Nicely lied / bleated, DildoRider... did you forget that I proved that
>> only 3 Dixiecrat politicians ever switched from Democrat to
>> Republican? Shall we let you get your stoooopid ass kicked on this
>> topic again, too? Because you've run away from reality on this, as
>> well. LOL

> great day to choose the "republicans aren't racist" angle!  LOLOLOLOLOL

> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist
> 
> http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/
> 
> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830

Obama bleating because Trump exercised his right not to correct a
retard? That's the best you've got? LOL

> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/

You're calling Ben Carson, a black man, racist? How are Muslims a
"race", Delusional DildoRider? LOL

>>> i mean, who would blame them, with all of the splendid things that
>>> conservatives do for minorities and immigrants in recent times,  
>>> especially below the mason-dixon.  right? </sarcasm>

>> You obviously have a problem with chronology, DildoRider... how could
>> these Dixiecrats have switched back then based upon "all of the
>> splendid things that conservatives do for minorities and immigrants in
>> recent times"? Oh, are you trying to lay the groundwork for another
>> libtard lie? You libtards are far too stupid to get away with that,
>> why do you even try? LOL

> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist
> 
> http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/
>
> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830
> 
> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/

Repeat bleating while quoting a Glenn Beck website, DildoRider? You
*are* melting down badly. LOL

>>>>> you seem to fancy yourself an expert on what gay dudes think, it  
>>>>> seems.

>>>> Your further admission that you're a "gay dude" is noted, DildoRider.

>>> except you and i weren't talking about me.

>> You were. I was laughing at you, DildoRider. LOL

> lame.

IKIABWAY gay-lame noted, DildoRider. LOL

>>> we are talking about the "gay dudes" in your imagination that you
>>> figure would screw anything that had a hole in it...

>> No, I was talking about the gay guy who's so cock-obsessed he'll ride
>> cock every chance he gets,

> more late-night cock fantasies from fakey.

Says the guy who's so cock-obsessed he'll ride cock every chance he
gets, and when he can't get that chance, he'll make his "girlfriend"
strap one on so he can get more pegboy experience... all while
k'laming that because he rides cocks *and* gets reamed by a woman
wearing a strap-on, that makes him "bisexual". LOL

>> and when he can't get that chance, he'll
>> make his "girlfriend" strap one on so he can get more pegboy
>> experience... all while k'laming that because he rides cocks *and*
>> gets reamed by a woman wearing a strap-on, that makes him "bisexual".
>> LOL

> more fetish fantasy from fakey.

Says the CoCkAdDiCt who's admitted he uses dating websites to get more
cock. LOL

>>> because maybe you just might be one of those kinds of "dudes".

>> Your delusional and hopeful fanfic is hilarious, DildoRider. Nice
>> backpedal, BTW. LOL

> so i *was* responding to your fanfic!  i knew it! HAHAHA

Wow, you're backpedaling so fast you're fanfic'ing about your own
fanfic. LOL

>>>> Now you backpedal and blurt out that you're not gay, you suck dicks
>>>> *and* get rectally reamed by women with strap-on dildos, which means
>>>> you're "bisexual". LOL

>>> and all of that means

>> All that means is that you don't deny sucking dicks, Faggot. LOL

> would your wife?

Your comparing yourself to a woman, noted. Your tacit admission that
you suck dick, noted. LOL

> did she laugh at my "taking out the trash" quip or are  
> you now busy cleaning the gutters and raking the lawn?

That you suck *so* *much* cock that you equate it to common everyday
occurrences such as taking out the trash, cleaning the gutters and
raking the lawn, noted. LOL

>>> that you are just another boring vanilla "str8" dude who can't
>>> seem to grasp that there's nothing wrong about consensual activities.

>> You fantasize about getting boned in the ass as you're taking a
>> strap-on dildo... and that's when you're not actually getting boned in
>> the ass... you're gay. You've admitted it. LOL

> how much pussy do you eat?  ...on average?  LOL

Enough. LOL

>>> all people are naturally bisexual, by the way.

>> Bullshit. That's another libtard lie as they try to sell the gay
>> agenda.

> "sell", LOL.  seems like there's more profit in "selling" a  
> hyper-testosterone laden agenda... or have you not noticed the last 200  
> years of media and entertainment, dumbass?

That's why only you broken-brain libtards believe the gay agenda,
DildoRider. Only an idiot would believe that stupid shit. LOL

>>> people like you deal with your socially "taboo" bisexual thoughts
>>> by attacking bisexuals.  there are even people who have convinced
>>> themselves that they are homosexuals who display the exact same
>>> behavior of slandering bisexuals.

>> And then there are us red-blooded real men who find you nancy little
>> poofs to be a disgusting aberration, so we make fun of your
>> congenitally broken little brains. LOL

> "red blooded real men" who k'lame on usenet from behind a keyboard that  
> they have visited the homes of trannies that they further ironikally  
> k'lame are "stalkers".  LOL

Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

> red-blooded real men who take every opportunity to expose their hatred and  
> denigration of all things feminine are definitely the "norm", but i  
> wouldn't call it "normal".  you don't even respect your wife.  if you did,  
> you'd not be stalking trannies and knocking on their doors.

Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

>>>> Ah, so you go to those pride parades instead. Good of you to admit it.
>>>> LOL

>>> nope, no parades either.  i don't have a strong desire to surround  
>>> myself with idiots.

>> Hence your life spent on Usenet. Way to catch yourself in yet another
>> lie, DildoRider. LOL

> life?  dude, you've outposted me by like 100:1 for about a decade.  care  
> to explain away that little tidbit?

"a decade" LOL

You kooks often melt down so badly you lose all ability to process
chronology. You've demonstrated that fact before, DildoRider. LOL

>>> where'd you meet your wife?  high school?  frat party?  mike davis'
>>> russian bride website?  HAHAHA

>> Junior High.

> i almost guessed this instead of high school, but i didn't figure you were  
> *that* much of a jock stereotype dummy.

"dummy" LOL

Is *that* why you ran away from all that proof that your entire
libtard life is based upon delusion and lies, DildoRider? LOL

> the same girl since junior high?  that must get old, eh?

Hell, no. That you have to continually find new guys to fuck on dating
websites as you dress up as a tranny must mean you find your sex life
so mundane that you require variety, DildoRider. LOL

>> By the time we'd graduated, we'd already decided to get
>> married as soon as we both were 18. And it's been a dream life every
>> since... some people are just lucky like that, we get to meet that
>> perfect one. And some of you have to fuck a million frogs to find your
>> prince, DildoRider. LOL

> aw, that's so cute... i've never seen those sorts of junior high  
> situations go horribly sour after a few decades.  LOL
> 
> did you knock her up in 12th grade and then have to buy the ring?

Awww, your fanfic is getting more extreme and hilarious, DildoRider.
LOL

>>>>> oh surely, or why else would you be compelled to publicly expose
>>>>> yourself as dull fanged pseudointellectual.

>>>> You fucked up your grammar and capitalization above, DildoRider...

>>> faglames... ineffective... must use... grammar lames...</fakeyBrane>

>> Wow, you're melting down pretty badly, DildoRider. Was it something I
>> said? LOL

> grammar lames... are worthless... must resort to... "was it something i  
> said" lame...<fakeyBrane>

Your evasion is noted, DildoRider. LOL

>>>> it's nearly always the case that kooks, in trying to claim someone
>>>> else to be stupid, fuck up in some manner. It's called a Freudian
>>>> slip, and you just made one.

>>> there's those dull fangs again... just gnawing and gnawing and getting
>>> nowhere.
>>>
>>> your public admission that you are a dull-fanged pseudo-intellectual is
>>> hereby corroborated by your incessant grammar lames and faglames.

>> "dull fanged"... DildoRider wants guys to eat him. What a fag. LOL

> lame.

IGCBSANIB noted, DildoRider. LOL

>> Your public admission that you are a slow-witted dildoriding libtard
>> tranny faggot is perpetually corroborated by your incessant blathering
>> on about the gay mindset and various and sundry other fagsign. LOL

> IKYABWAI

IKYABWAI-lame noted, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>> anything else?

>>>> And stoooopid.
>>>> And gay.
>>>> And delusional.
>>>> And gay.
>>>> And moronic.
>>>> And gay.
>>>> And pwned.
>>>>
>>>> And gay.

>>> that's it?  i thought there'd be more fixation on your hatred of gays
>>> because it reminds you of all of those rated-X fakeyFanfics that get you
>>> hot and bothered...
>>>
>>> there's definitely something else that you are withholding from the
>>> discussion.  ;)

>> Speaking of fanfic... you seem to be blurting an awful lot of it...
>> perhaps because I've used truth and reality to drop-kick your retarded
>> ass across Usenet, and fanfic is all you've got left, DildoRider. LOL

> more lames triggered by your butthurt.

And now you're projecting. You're melting down pretty badly,
DildoRider. Was it something I said? LOL

>>>> Now you bleat more, DildoRider.

>>> it seems that you hear a lot of bleating, for some reason.

>> That'd be because you're bleating up a storm, DildoRider. LOL

> sure seems different from my perspective...

Says the guy who's fanfic'ing like crazy, who's been backed into
admitting he's so cock-obsessed he dresses up as a tranny to pick up
dudes on a dating website, who's bleating up a frothy foot-stomping
storm, and who's beating his little chicken chest and offering to
fight 11 year olds. LOL

You're one step away from putting on your tranny garb and trolling the
red light district for cock, DildoRider. If you haven't already. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526422 — Re: Money doesn't buy you health.

On Friday, October 16, 2015 at 9:32:16 AM UTC-5, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>  
> "Fakey" (Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus)
> is sad, angry, confused and ashamed.
> 
> I, on the other hand, am happy, informed and proud.
> Like @Fakeys_dogwhistle, I'll tell you where I live.
> 

Like anyone gives a rats ass.


> Capitalism is freedom;
> freedom to do good _or_ bad.
> 
> Socialism is important because society is important.
> What are we, if not social beings, part of a group ? !
> 
> When you give kids too much money,
> they'll just spend it, not earn it;
> i.e. you'll fuck them up, big time.
> 
> Bill Gates knows this, as does Warren Buffett.
> 
> Money doesn't buy you health;
> not mental health, not physical health.
> What else matters ? I wonder.
http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_scripts/jail.php
       Now take my case.  I've been here five years, and every night they take 
       me down for ten minutes, then they hang me up again ... which I regard 
       as very fair ... in view of what I done ... and if nothing else, it's 
       taught me to respect the Romans, and it's taught me that you'll never 
       get anywhere in life unless you're prepared to do a fair day's work for 
       a fair day's pay ... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521771

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
<news:ee12c48b8333d8c451ca8ee71e83fce2@dizum.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> That you kooks cannot grasp the enormity of the forces involved leads
> you to make false assumptions... and once emotionally invested in
> your decision to remain uneducated, you continue to compound and
> expand your stupidity and insanity, eventually culminating in the
> hilariously wrong types of conclusions that kooks such as Michael
> Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) arrive at. This is the process that leads
> you into insanity.

Whoops, that's what I get for cut-n-pasting my previous ass-kickings
of you TrooferTards without reviewing it.

Should be Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky) above. That was written when I
was trying to troll Roger into proudly admitting to stalking a woman
for 20 years, getting smacked down by the court for his litigious
harassment of her mom, then creating 7 websites that he's kept up for
more than a decade since, in which he misquotes, lies and takes out of
context the court transcripts in a pathetic attempt to paint himself
as the victim after he stalked that woman for 20 years.

Roger didn't fall for it, so deep down he's ashamed of his behavior,
but far too much of a prideful idiot to admit he was wrong. Much as
he's far too much of a prideful idiot to admit he's wrong about his
9/11 Troofer tardisms.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web