Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #547228 > unrolled thread

The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:32 -0600
    Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-22 17:59 +0000
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 12:43 -0600
    The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:46 -0800
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 12:48 +1100
        Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 02:20 +0000
          Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 12:39 +1100
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 02:12 +0000
              Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:18 -0500
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-24 03:20 +0000
              Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim GogoJF <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 19:50 -0800
                Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim GogoJF <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-23 20:00 -0800
              Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 15:06 +1100
                Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-24 05:18 +0000
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 23:00 -0800
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 23:00 -0800
              Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:19 -0500
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 12:11 -0800
              Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-24 12:29 -0800
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:17 -0500
      Re: Is is alive ? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:33 -0500
      Re: Is is alive ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 12:41 +1100
      Is is alive ? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-23 22:46 -0800
    Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-22 18:53 +0000
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:22 -0600
        Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 19:21 +0000
          Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 12:46 +1100
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 02:17 +0000
              Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 15:04 +1100
                Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 06:16 +0000
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:13 -0500
              Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2016-01-25 06:33 -0500
                Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:53 -0600
    Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:11 -0800
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-22 20:26 +0000
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 16:13 -0800
        Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-22 17:15 -0800
        Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-23 02:21 +0000
          Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 15:40 -0800
            Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 01:43 +0000
        Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-24 15:07 +1100
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:30 -0500
    Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-23 14:08 -0800
      Re: The aliens are silent because they're dead Jim benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 02:08 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#547488 — Re: Is is alive ?

On 01/23/2016 10:17 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
>
>     Supose you build a robot that wants what humans want,
>     one that thinks it's alive.   Is is alive ?
>
>
Rolf, are YOU alive? Don't think so.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547690 — Re: Is is alive ?

On 24/01/2016 2:17 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
>
>     Supose you build a robot that wants what humans want,
>     one that thinks it's alive.   Is is alive ?
>
>

It's really not a helpful question. Before you can answer such a 
question, you need to define the word "alive". Once you've done that, 
you can answer the question, which accordingly serves no real purpose.

Sylvia

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547726 — Is is alive ?

Maybe artificial intelligence is the wrong approach for  
robots.  Artificial stupidity might be the answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547264

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> The aliens are silent because they're dead

If only certain copyright violaters were dead.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547515

On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.


   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
   absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger
   Management classes. You, jimp, need these services:
 > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

The aliens are silent because they're dead
 > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-aliens-silent-theyre-dead.html
 > http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/thealiensare.jpg

 > Life on other planets would likely be brief and become extinct very
 > quickly, say astrobiologists from The Australian National University
 > (ANU).
 >
 > In research aiming to understand how life might develop, the
 > scientists realised new life would commonly die out due to *runaway*
 > *heating or cooling* on their fledgling planets.
 >
 > "The universe is probably filled with habitable planets, so many
 > scientists think it should be teeming with aliens," said Dr Aditya
 > Chopra from the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences and lead author
 > on the paper, which is published in Astrobiology.
 >






-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547620

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.
> 
> 
>   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your

Why do you ignore copyrights?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547695

On 24/01/2016 6:21 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.
>>
>>
>>    Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
>
> Why do you ignore copyrights?
>
>

Deciding whether something is a breach of copyright is not as simple as 
observing that something was copied. Publishing an excerpt together with 
a reference to the original would not be unless the excerpt is so large 
as to amount to a substantial part of the original.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547702

Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
> On 24/01/2016 6:21 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.
>>>
>>>
>>>    Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
>>
>> Why do you ignore copyrights?
>>
>>
> 
> Deciding whether something is a breach of copyright is not as simple as 
> observing that something was copied. Publishing an excerpt together with 
> a reference to the original would not be unless the excerpt is so large 
> as to amount to a substantial part of the original.
> 
> Sylvia.

Sure it is if the entirety of the material is copied material.

What is Fair Use?

"In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted
material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to
comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."

http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/

As the copyright violator in question never provides comment upon,
critique, or parody, Q.E.D.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547712

On 24/01/2016 1:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>> On 24/01/2016 6:21 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
>>>
>>> Why do you ignore copyrights?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Deciding whether something is a breach of copyright is not as simple as
>> observing that something was copied. Publishing an excerpt together with
>> a reference to the original would not be unless the excerpt is so large
>> as to amount to a substantial part of the original.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Sure it is if the entirety of the material is copied material.
>
> What is Fair Use?
>
> "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted
> material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to
> comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."
>
> http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/
>
> As the copyright violator in question never provides comment upon,
> critique, or parody, Q.E.D.
>
>

You can't start at the end and work backwards.

The issue of fair use only arises if the use would otherwise be a breach 
of copyright. Not all uses are a breach of copyright, so your starting 
point has to be the question of whether the particular use is a breach.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547724

Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
> On 24/01/2016 1:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>>> On 24/01/2016 6:21 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
>>>>
>>>> Why do you ignore copyrights?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Deciding whether something is a breach of copyright is not as simple as
>>> observing that something was copied. Publishing an excerpt together with
>>> a reference to the original would not be unless the excerpt is so large
>>> as to amount to a substantial part of the original.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> Sure it is if the entirety of the material is copied material.
>>
>> What is Fair Use?
>>
>> "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted
>> material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to
>> comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."
>>
>> http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/
>>
>> As the copyright violator in question never provides comment upon,
>> critique, or parody, Q.E.D.
>>
>>
> 
> You can't start at the end and work backwards.
> 
> The issue of fair use only arises if the use would otherwise be a breach 
> of copyright. Not all uses are a breach of copyright, so your starting 
> point has to be the question of whether the particular use is a breach.
> 
> Sylvia.

If a copyright specifically states that the work may only be copied,
without prior permission, for use within a commentary on the subject
or a critque of the original work, and the copier does nothing but
copy the original work absent any commentary or critque, it seems
pretty clear to me that the copyright has been violated.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547733

On 01/23/2016 08:46 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 24/01/2016 6:21 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.
>>>
>>>
>>>    Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
>>
>> Why do you ignore copyrights?
>>
>>
>
> Deciding whether something is a breach of copyright is not as simple as
> observing that something was copied. Publishing an excerpt together with
> a reference to the original would not be unless the excerpt is so large
> as to amount to a substantial part of the original.
>
> Sylvia.

Generally speaking your view has NOT been taken by the courts who have 
supported authors with the lone exception of satire. Of course Wormley's 
cut and paste may actually fall under that exception!

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547973

On 1/24/2016 2:13 AM, benj wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 08:46 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 24/01/2016 6:21 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/22/16 12:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> If only certain copyright violaters were dead.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
>>>
>>> Why do you ignore copyrights?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Deciding whether something is a breach of copyright is not as simple as
>> observing that something was copied. Publishing an excerpt together with
>> a reference to the original would not be unless the excerpt is so large
>> as to amount to a substantial part of the original.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Generally speaking your view has NOT been taken by the courts who have
> supported authors with the lone exception of satire. Of course Wormley's
> cut and paste may actually fall under that exception!

It seems odd. If an author publishes a small portion of someone else's 
work and uses that in an attempt to debunk it he's often accused of 
"cherry-picking", but if he publishes it all he's accused of copyright 
infringement. Seems like a no-win situation.

-- 
dvus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#548024

On 1/25/2016 5:33 AM, dvus wrote:
> It seems odd. If an author publishes a small portion of someone else's
> work and uses that in an attempt to debunk it he's often accused of
> "cherry-picking", but if he publishes it all he's accused of copyright
> infringement. Seems like a no-win situation.

This is why it's good to include a reference to the entirety of the the 
original work, so the reader can decide for themselves whether you've 
cherry-picked. If you have, then it's obvious by comparing your extract 
with the full original reference.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547288

On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:32:48 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> The aliens are silent because they're dead
> > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-aliens-silent-theyre-dead.html
> > http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/thealiensare.jpg
> 
> 
> > Life on other planets would likely be brief and become extinct very
> > quickly, say astrobiologists from The Australian National University
> > (ANU).
> >
> > In research aiming to understand how life might develop, the
> > scientists realised new life would commonly die out due to *runaway*
> > *heating or cooling* on their fledgling planets.
> >
> > "The universe is probably filled with habitable planets, so many
> > scientists think it should be teeming with aliens," said Dr Aditya
> > Chopra from the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences and lead author
> > on the paper, which is published in Astrobiology.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Weare the aliens.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547293

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:32:48 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> The aliens are silent because they're dead
>> > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-aliens-silent-theyre-dead.html
>> > http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/thealiensare.jpg
>> 
>> 
>> > Life on other planets would likely be brief and become extinct very
>> > quickly, say astrobiologists from The Australian National University
>> > (ANU).
>> >
>> > In research aiming to understand how life might develop, the
>> > scientists realised new life would commonly die out due to *runaway*
>> > *heating or cooling* on their fledgling planets.
>> >
>> > "The universe is probably filled with habitable planets, so many
>> > scientists think it should be teeming with aliens," said Dr Aditya
>> > Chopra from the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences and lead author
>> > on the paper, which is published in Astrobiology.
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> Weare the aliens.TreBert

As what, shoes?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547344

On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 12:11:56 PM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:32:48 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > The aliens are silent because they're dead
> > > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-aliens-silent-theyre-dead.html
> > > http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/thealiensare.jpg
> > 
> > 
> > > Life on other planets would likely be brief and become extinct very
> > > quickly, say astrobiologists from The Australian National University
> > > (ANU).
> > >
> > > In research aiming to understand how life might develop, the
> > > scientists realised new life would commonly die out due to *runaway*
> > > *heating or cooling* on their fledgling planets.
> > >
> > > "The universe is probably filled with habitable planets, so many
> > > scientists think it should be teeming with aliens," said Dr Aditya
> > > Chopra from the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences and lead author
> > > on the paper, which is published in Astrobiology.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> Weare the aliens.TreBert

My sci.fiction novel "Stepping Stones" tells it all.Great read,but never did I publish it. Now that I'm in Hollywood. Who knows???  TreBert  Spielberg where are you???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547363

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2" Glazier the LIAR wrote:
> My sci.fiction novel "Stepping Stones" tells it all.Great read,but never 
> did I publish it. Now that I'm in Hollywood. Who knows???  TreBert 
> Spielberg where are you???
>
hanson wrote:
Glazier, you pitifully filthy, LYING Full-Swine, listen up:
Just 48 hrs ago you pledged in thread: "re Little White Lies"
wherein
>
Glazier the Lying Full-Swine wrote:
I will stop telling this group my plans.Where I live. How I;m doing etc.
>
hanson wrote:
Glazier, how come you are back, breaking your own promise?
Are you just continuing with your obsessive, habitually lying
self-aggrandizement, which can be seen as soon as you
>
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com>  :B::ert Glazier, the
hate-mongering Swine, introduces himself with/as
>
:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
:B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that
:B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face
:B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide".
:B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh".
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
>
:B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert.
:B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement".
:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
:B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert
:B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody
:B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his
:B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a
:B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob.
:B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
 >
about which ....
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
"Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote:
>
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike.
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"Bert you are an idiot."
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert
you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head.
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which....
 >
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can.
Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse
than the man's on the street.
Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage.
reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave .
reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me.
reber, you don't believe in science.
Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup.
Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__.
Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!..
 >
Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit...
Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts.
You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself.
 >
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT!
Saul Levy
 >
Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy
or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way.
 >
benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier,
but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is!
Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"...
 >
hanson wrote:
So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and
your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works,
... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year
old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's
Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier?
 >
Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies?
Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man?
He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D]
BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans
which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the
ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal
Graveyard Vandal who wrote:
 >
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
 >
Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic
alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile
IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which
Glazier proudly announced & posted...
 >
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
 >
Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even
worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier
widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier
threatened...
 >
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert.
 >
(4)
The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected
to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier
labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-
movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__.
who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons
female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice
legs"...
 >
hanson wrote:
Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in
and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you
sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been
"put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from
the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your
legacy, is because:
 >
Glazier the Swine fortunately posted:
.... "hanson made me famous"....
 >
hanson wrote
So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish
me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since
it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for:
>
--- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ----            27'833 hits & rising
--- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ----   27'953 hits & rising
>
cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental
cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547384

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 12:11:56 PM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:32:48 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > The aliens are silent because they're dead
>> > > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-aliens-silent-theyre-dead.html
>> > > http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/thealiensare.jpg
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > Life on other planets would likely be brief and become extinct very
>> > > quickly, say astrobiologists from The Australian National University
>> > > (ANU).
>> > >
>> > > In research aiming to understand how life might develop, the
>> > > scientists realised new life would commonly die out due to *runaway*
>> > > *heating or cooling* on their fledgling planets.
>> > >
>> > > "The universe is probably filled with habitable planets, so many
>> > > scientists think it should be teeming with aliens," said Dr Aditya
>> > > Chopra from the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences and lead author
>> > > on the paper, which is published in Astrobiology.
>> > >
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > 
>> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> > community, and physics-related social issues.
>> 
>> Weare the aliens.TreBert
> 
> My sci.fiction novel "Stepping Stones" tells it all.Great read,but never did I publish it. Now that I'm in Hollywood. Who knows???  TreBert  Spielberg where are you???

Anaheim is not Hollywood or even near it.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547678

On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:31:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 12:11:56 PM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> >> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:32:48 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> >> > The aliens are silent because they're dead
> >> > > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-aliens-silent-theyre-dead.html
> >> > > http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/thealiensare.jpg
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > > Life on other planets would likely be brief and become extinct very
> >> > > quickly, say astrobiologists from The Australian National University
> >> > > (ANU).
> >> > >
> >> > > In research aiming to understand how life might develop, the
> >> > > scientists realised new life would commonly die out due to *runaway*
> >> > > *heating or cooling* on their fledgling planets.
> >> > >
> >> > > "The universe is probably filled with habitable planets, so many
> >> > > scientists think it should be teeming with aliens," said Dr Aditya
> >> > > Chopra from the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences and lead author
> >> > > on the paper, which is published in Astrobiology.
> >> > >
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > 
> >> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> >> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> >> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> >> 
> >> Weare the aliens.TreBert
> > 
> > My sci.fiction novel "Stepping Stones" tells it all.Great read,but never did I publish it. Now that I'm in Hollywood. Who knows???  TreBert  Spielberg where are you???
> 
> Anaheim is not Hollywood or even near it.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Its 3200 miles closer than Boston.I'v been to universal.Holywood and Vine I rented a motel just up the street from Decker records. I've been around.No my way .around

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547693

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:31:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 12:11:56 PM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> >> On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 9:32:48 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> >> > The aliens are silent because they're dead
>> >> > > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-aliens-silent-theyre-dead.html
>> >> > > http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2016/thealiensare.jpg
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > > Life on other planets would likely be brief and become extinct very
>> >> > > quickly, say astrobiologists from The Australian National University
>> >> > > (ANU).
>> >> > >
>> >> > > In research aiming to understand how life might develop, the
>> >> > > scientists realised new life would commonly die out due to *runaway*
>> >> > > *heating or cooling* on their fledgling planets.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "The universe is probably filled with habitable planets, so many
>> >> > > scientists think it should be teeming with aliens," said Dr Aditya
>> >> > > Chopra from the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences and lead author
>> >> > > on the paper, which is published in Astrobiology.
>> >> > >
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > -- 
>> >> > 
>> >> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> >> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> >> > community, and physics-related social issues.
>> >> 
>> >> Weare the aliens.TreBert
>> > 
>> > My sci.fiction novel "Stepping Stones" tells it all.Great read,but never did I publish it. Now that I'm in Hollywood. Who knows???  TreBert  Spielberg where are you???
>> 
>> Anaheim is not Hollywood or even near it.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> Its 3200 miles closer than Boston.I'v been to universal.Holywood and Vine I rented a motel just up the street from Decker records. I've been around.No my way .around

It is also 240,000 miles closer than the Moon.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web