Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 232 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:08 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 15:53 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger now claims he actually won his suit. It was dismissed, meaning he lost) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger still doesn't understand the law) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Kid still doesn't understand the law at all ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Roger PROVES he still doesn't understand the law at all and that he FEARS offering an honest answer to questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:45 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah the stalker proves she is clearly lying now ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:42 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:41 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 09:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:21 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile that can't prove she is smart "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:39 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:58 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Page 6 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 12 Next page →
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #517750 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net... >> >>>>> Now back to the link above. Do you really think fertilizer bombs can >>>>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire >>>>> bombs? >> >> If you just get a fireball when setting off ANFO, you're doing it wrong. >> ANFO is widely used in quarrying and mining. It's the most used explosive >> in the United States because it's cheap and relatively safe. The Oklahoma >> City bomb was actually a more powerful variant of ANFO, ammonium nitrate+ >> nitromethane. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO >Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now why >was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing damage >from a single location? What do you mean "cut like a knife"? The whole front of the building was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife". Like you'd expect from a truck bomb. >And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation Area?" Except there wasn't. More importantly, there was no radiation detected at Oklahoma City. That by itself is enough to disprove nuke kooktardery. Not to mention no seismometer readings with the distinct nuclear detonation signature. None. >>>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers >>>>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> no it doesn't >> >>>Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. >> >> Here's the evidence, Michael. >Nope, my name is not Mike, Michael or any varient of that and it never has >been. Plus a lot of people can vouch for that. Ok, how about if I just call you "Kooktard" from now on, Michael. >> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark. Just small >> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the >> towers. >You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add to >the lies from the media. Yup. No radiation detected. Just vague unsubstantiated claims from various k00ksites. If there was a nuke there, all of Lower Manhattan would be hot as hell with radiation. Don't forget an underground or ground level nuke neutron activates the surrounding material, making it extremely radioactive. >> 2) No EMPs detected. All electronics would have been fried, all >> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs. >I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP. There was *no* EMP at all. If there was, there would be no video of the collapses, helicopters would fall out of the air, etc. as all electronics in the area would be fried. >I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS >chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground >under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera. They don't use AM for helicopter to ground station for video, K00ktard. No matter, the transmitter and receiver would have been wiped out, AM or not. >To me the ground shaking and the recorded EMP are two things that when tied >together prove a nuclear detonation took place in Nuke York City. You are a k00ktard, so your "to me" opinions are irrelevant. What is relevant are the many seismograph readings that did record the collapse (likely including the shaking) as a 2.3 magnitude quake but no nuclear detonation signature, thus disproving any nuke use. >> 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud. >Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud >incase you didn't know. And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom cloud >to say nukes. They do if they break through the ground, which they would have to do in order to "vaporize" the towers. But there were no fireballs and no mushroom clouds spreading radiation everywhere. So no nukes. >> 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers. >ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North >Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not caught >on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. What about all the other seismographs worldwide that the USGS had no control over? You never answered this, because you can't. No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear detonation. They did record all the shaking/collapse as a 2.3 magnitude quake, however. >Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied >about Ground Zero why not the USGS too? Irrelevant. No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear detonation. USGS can't change that no matter how much they may have wanted to lie about anything. >> 5) We don't have the technology, neither now nor in 1968, to dig down >> 37-96 *miles* needed to do the things you claim. >That is more total bullshit from the Friendly Neighborhood Nut and I even >gave him a link to try and correct his bullshit: Here see for yourself it >is more like 77 meters below surface level. See: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition Why such a k00ky Wikipedia URL? Is it because that article wouldn't last 5 seconds as a normal Wikipedia article before all the falsehoods were corrected? But it could exist by itself in some kooktard's sandbox? >> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves >> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and >> dust. >ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive dirt >hauled out. I already accounted for your 120 truckloads of dirt. 108,342 truckloads hauled out minus 120 truckloads that were brought in = 108,222 truckloads of actual debris hauled out. How do you explain 108,222 truckloads of debris (1.5 million tons!) if the towers were vaporized, k00k? >And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because >photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers. There's a lot of debris there (including lots of metal), k00k! Why don't you look at your own picture!! >> 7) All the videos of the collapses show the towers collapsing from the top >> down, not the bottom up. >ROTFLMAO because the debris on the ground where the Twin Towers were was not >from the top 100 floors but from the bottom 10 floors or less. See: There are a zillion videos of the towers collapsing, k00k. They all show the towers collapsing from the impact floors down, not the bottom up. And none of those videocams were disabled by EMPs! None! >> 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers *while >> it was collapsing* weren't nuked. >Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but there >is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now. How can there be any radiation sickness if it's known for fact there was no radiation? I'm not discounting many people got sick, cancer etc. from the toxic smoke, asbestos, dust (silicosis), fumes and so forth at the site. We know that it wasn't from radiation. >> Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on? >I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who I >am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an >attorney present to represent me. <G> So what crime were you tried for? I have never been on trial for a crime in my life. Also, did you actually commit that crime? I'm not asking if you were found not guilty, you already answered that, I'm asking if you actually did the deed and got away with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <MPG.304e11b3d726614d98ad6d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518143 |
In article <ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com says... > >Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now why > >was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing damage > >from a single location? > > What do you mean "cut like a knife"? The whole front of the building > was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife". > Like you'd expect from a truck bomb. > I can explain that. I think what the OP meant, was cut like a DULL knife. You know how when you try to cut a cake with a dull knife, and it sort of smooshes the cake all over the place, instead of making a nice clean cut? That's what the Alfred P. Murrah building looked like... a cake that had been smooshed all over the place like it had been cut with a dull knife. HTH -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) |
| Message-ID | <dYqdnQKrGcMHH3nInZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518156 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.304e11b3d726614d98ad6d@news.altopia.com... > In article <ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com > says... > > >> >Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now >> >why >> >was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing >> >damage >> >from a single location? >> >> What do you mean "cut like a knife"? The whole front of the building >> was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife". >> Like you'd expect from a truck bomb. >> > > I can explain that. I think what the OP meant, was cut like a DULL > knife. You know how when you try to cut a cake with a dull knife, and > it sort of smooshes the cake all over the place, instead of making a > nice clean cut? That's what the Alfred P. Murrah building looked > like... a cake that had been smooshed all over the place like it had > been cut with a dull knife. HTH Yes, yes, yes because that still does not look like it was caused by a single point explosion and it never did. And just like with Flight 77 videos of the event were immediately confiscated so we might never know what was really recorded at Hoaxlahoma City. Oh, I just happened to watch a video about Hoaxlahoma and they said in 2009 the videos were returned and magically none of them caught the bomb. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <jKidnTS5IqHF4XnInZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518143 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net... >>> >>>>>> Now back to the link above. Do you really think fertilizer bombs can >>>>>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire >>>>>> bombs? >>> >>> If you just get a fireball when setting off ANFO, you're doing it wrong. >>> ANFO is widely used in quarrying and mining. It's the most used >>> explosive >>> in the United States because it's cheap and relatively safe. The >>> Oklahoma >>> City bomb was actually a more powerful variant of ANFO, ammonium >>> nitrate+ >>> nitromethane. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO > >>Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now >>why >>was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing >>damage >>from a single location? > > What do you mean "cut like a knife"? The whole front of the building > was blown off, it was a big freaking mess, not "cut like a knife". > Like you'd expect from a truck bomb. > >>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation >>Area?" > > Except there wasn't. riiight. Too bad you have no supporting evidence. > More importantly, there was no radiation detected > at Oklahoma City. That by itself is enough to disprove nuke kooktardery. > Not to mention no seismometer readings with the distinct nuclear > detonation signature. None. And you heard about that by watching Bugs Bunny or the Roadrunner? In other words it sure would be nice if you had some support for your bullshit. And while I agree big nukes will leave a seismic reading what if all they used were a bunch of smaller nukes like in Hoaxlahoma City? And don't forget even though there are two videos that show something major happened in Nuke York City why didn't any of the seismographs show the event in question? BTW one video showed the North Tower shaking like a tuning fork and the other video showed an explosion at the exact same time as the shaking that took place near the base of the Twin Towers. And don't forget my video. I have an AM reciver operated by WCBS that recorded an EMP at the exact same time the explosion and the shaking took place. <G> And don' t forget what they used to lower the radiation from Chernobyl because it was concrete. And also don't forget that the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" was filled with concrete. <G> >>>>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers >>>>>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> no it doesn't >>> >>>>Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. >>> >>> Here's the evidence, Michael. > >>Nope, my name is not Mike, Michael or any varient of that and it never has >>been. Plus a lot of people can vouch for that. > > Ok, how about if I just call you "Kooktard" from now on, Michael. > >>> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark. Just small >>> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the >>> towers. > >>You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add >>to >>the lies from the media. > > Yup. No radiation detected. riiight. They also didn't find evidence of explosives at Ground Zero and we would find out later they didn't even look and I suspect the same holds true for your radiation bullshit. >>> 2) No EMPs detected. All electronics would have been fried, all >>> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs. > >>I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP. > > There was *no* EMP at all. If there was, there would be no video of > the collapses, helicopters would fall out of the air, etc. as all > electronics in the area would be fried. You have been watching too many Bugs Bunny Cartoons or maybe you have even been watching the NIST cartoons since NIST produced cartoons too. >>I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS >>chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground >>under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera. > > They don't use AM for helicopter to ground station for video And your evidence is what? They obviously had to use AM because nothing else could have caught the EMP at the exact same time a nuke shook the North Tower so hard the North Tower shook like a tuning fork and was even recocord on video. DUH > No matter, the transmitter and receiver would have been wiped out, AM or > not. Once again you have been watching too many bugs bunny cartoons or cartoons from NIST because a real EMP weapon has to be detonated in the atmosphere and not 77 meters underground. >>To me the ground shaking and the recorded EMP are two things that when >>tied >>together prove a nuclear detonation took place in Nuke York City. > > What is > relevant are the many seismograph readings that did record the collapse > (likely including the shaking) as a 2.3 magnitude quake but no nuclear > detonation signature, thus disproving any nuke use. And the seismograph reading also don't show the North Tower shaking like a tuning fork so they show clear evidence of being falsified. >>> 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud. > >>Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud >>incase you didn't know. And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom >>cloud >>to say nukes. > > They do if they break through the ground, which they would have to do in > order to "vaporize" the towers. But there were no fireballs and no > mushroom clouds spreading radiation everywhere. So no nukes. ROTFLMAO because you can use the following site to see there are consistencies in the mushroom cloud from Ground Zero and a mushroom cloud from an underground nuke. ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm>< >>> 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers. > >>ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North >>Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not >>caught >>on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. > > What about all the other seismographs worldwide that the USGS had no > control over? You never answered this, because you can't. No nuclear > detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear > detonation. They did record all the shaking/collapse as a 2.3 magnitude > quake, however. Just stick to the facts that were the North Tower shook like a Tuning Fork and people that felt it described it the exact same way they would decribe a 5.5 quake proving that all the seismic readings could be bogus. And if the people really behind 9/11 were international terrorist they could fix every single seismic reading. >>Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied >>about Ground Zero why not the USGS too? > > Irrelevant. No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, > worldwide), so no nuclear detonation. USGS can't change that no matter > how much they may have wanted to lie about anything. BULLSHIT the fact the North Tower shook so violently it was caught on camera and at the same time another camera caught an explosion proves the seismic reading are bullshit just like the rumor of the Twin Towers collapsing to the ground or jet in Nuke York City are proven by the fact the only debris on the ground is consistant with a bulding less than 10 floors high instead of 110 stories tall. >>> 5) We don't have the technology, neither now nor in 1968, to dig down >>> 37-96 *miles* needed to do the things you claim. > >>That is more total bullshit from the Friendly Neighborhood Nut and I even >>gave him a link to try and correct his bullshit: Here see for yourself it >>is more like 77 meters below surface level. See: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition > > Why such a k00ky Wikipedia URL? Is it because that article wouldn't last > 5 seconds as a normal Wikipedia article before all the falsehoods were > corrected? But it could exist by itself in some kooktard's sandbox? And yet you can't find anything wrong with it so you have to rely on others? >>> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves >>> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and >>> dust. > >>ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive >>dirt >>hauled out. > > I already accounted for your 120 truckloads of dirt. 108,342 truckloads > hauled out minus 120 truckloads that were brought in = 108,222 truckloads > of actual debris hauled out. How do you explain 108,222 truckloads of > debris (1.5 million tons!) if the towers were vaporized, k00k? All you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers to see very little of that could have been from the Twin Towers themselves. DUH. >>And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because >>photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers. > > There's a lot of debris there (including lots of metal), k00k! Why > don't you look at your own picture!! Dude the walls that were left standing of the Twin Towers were from 6 to 8 floors high. If the debris had come down instead of floating away the debris pile itself would have been much higher than the walls that were left standing. The debris left is only consistant with a 10 story building and not a 110 story building so what happened to the debris from the other 100 floors? <G> >>> 7) All the videos of the collapses show the towers collapsing from the >>> top >>> down, not the bottom up. > >>ROTFLMAO because the debris on the ground where the Twin Towers were was >>not >>from the top 100 floors but from the bottom 10 floors or less. See: > > There are a zillion videos of the towers collapsing, k00k. They all show > the towers collapsing from the impact floors down, not the bottom up. > And none of those videocams were disabled by EMPs! None! But if you think they collapsed all the way to the ground you are really an idiot especially after I've furnished proof that the falling debris couldn't crush the walls that were left standing or the dozen or so people that survived inside of Stairwell B of the North Tower because that debris was ultra fine and floated away just as numerous photos show. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers >>> *while >>> it was collapsing* weren't nuked. > >>Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but >>there >>is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now. > > How can there be any radiation sickness if it's known for fact there was > no radiation? I'm not discounting many people got sick, cancer etc. from > the toxic smoke, asbestos, dust (silicosis), fumes and so forth at > the site. We know that it wasn't from radiation. Where the fcuk do you come up with that no radiation bullshit? The facts remain there was plenty of M291 resin used to cover the area where the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. And the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" where another nuke was detonated was filled with concrete to try and keep that radition down too. PLUS LOOK WHAT THEY PUT AT GROUND ZERO!!! They put great big water fountains up to try and wash away any remaining radition. DUH. >>> Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on? > >>I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who >>I >>am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an >>attorney present to represent me. <G> > > So what crime were you tried for? I have never been on trial for a crime > in my life. Also, did you actually commit that crime? I'm not asking if > you were found not guilty, you already answered that, I'm asking if you > actually did the deed and got away with it. I did not do what I was accused but I wish I had because it would been super funny since the way I won my jury trial was to completely impeach all 3 of the State's witnesses with and dig this, their own evidence! The State never looked at the evidence they had because they didn't think I'd know how to present it and they were obviously quite wrong. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <ms3hbs$uaq$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #518160 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation >>>Area?" >> >> Except there wasn't. >riiight. Too bad you have no supporting evidence. Can't prove a negative, k00ktard. Besides, you made the outlandish claim, the burden of proof is on you. >> More importantly, there was no radiation detected >> at Oklahoma City. That by itself is enough to disprove nuke kooktardery. >> Not to mention no seismometer readings with the distinct nuclear >> detonation signature. None. >And you heard about that by watching Bugs Bunny or the Roadrunner? In other >words it sure would be nice if you had some support for your bullshit. I just checked - you can get geiger counters for under $30 on Ebay. I had a surplus Cold War geiger counter when I was a kid. There are a lot of Geiger counters out there. If OKC was "hot", *someone* would have noticed by now. It would still be "hot" today.. The Trinity site is still "hot" 70+ years after the fact. Remember also that a ground or underground blast is dirtier than an aerial blast. Prompt neutron activation creates all kinds of radioactive crap from the surrounding rock/dirt. >And while I agree big nukes will leave a seismic reading what if all they >used were a bunch of smaller nukes like in Hoaxlahoma City? *All* nuclear blasts create a distinctive seismic signature. Seismometers world wide will detect it. There's no way the USGS or any other US agency can censor them all, especially ones in countries unfriendly to the US. There's no escaping detection of a nuclear blast. We've been telling you over and over and over again and you still don't get it. >And don't forget even though there are two videos that show something major >happened in Nuke York City why didn't any of the seismographs show the event >in question? Once again, they *did* register the event in question. One tower registered as a 2.3 on the Richter Scale, the other measured 2.1. >And don't forget my video. I have an AM reciver operated by WCBS that >recorded an EMP at the exact same time the explosion and the shaking took >place. <G> There was no EMP, kooktard. If there was, the EMP would be the end of the video. The camera would be fried and the WCBS chopper would be knocked out of the sky. This, too, has been explained to you over and over again. Oh, and once again, the video link from the chopper was FM, not AM. >>>> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark. Just small >>>> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the >>>> towers. >> >>>You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add >>>to >>>the lies from the media. >> >> Yup. No radiation detected. >riiight. They also didn't find evidence of explosives at Ground Zero and we >would find out later they didn't even look and I suspect the same holds true >for your radiation bullshit. "I suspect" - Hah! Once again, Geiger counters are dirt cheap. I'm sure lots of kooktards rushed to the World Trade Center site, Geiger counter in hand, eager to prove the WTC was nuked, only to be disappointed that their Geiger counters remained silent. Meanwhile, remember that video of the 104 kiloton nuke producing the 290 foot dome? That was the "Sedan" shot. It produced a 12,000' tall radioactive smoke column that went on to contaminate much of the US. It left a 1280 foot diameter crater that was too radioactive to enter for 7 months. Meanwhile, rescuers were searching "the Pile" looking for trapped victims that same day. That 104 kiloton shot blew out 12 million tons of earth, producing a base surge 5 miles in diameter, leaving behind that radioactive crater, even though they drilled down 635 feet below ground level to bury it. Imagine what it would do to NYC if set off in Lower Manhattan! And you claim there was a 150 kiloton nuke buried just a few meters below the towers? No, you claim there were something like 34 of them!!! 34 nukes that don't produce any radioactivity, don't produce any giant craters, don't produce any EMPs, don't produce any fireballs, and don't produce any mushroom clouds or 12,000 foot smoke columns! How kooktarded is that! >>>> 2) No EMPs detected. All electronics would have been fried, all >>>> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs. >> >>>I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP. >> >> There was *no* EMP at all. If there was, there would be no video of >> the collapses, helicopters would fall out of the air, etc. as all >> electronics in the area would be fried. >You have been watching too many Bugs Bunny Cartoons or maybe you have even >been watching the NIST cartoons since NIST produced cartoons too. Your attempt to evade doesn't change the fact there was no EMP. >>>I'm saying that the AM receiver that was receiving the video from the WCBS >>>chopper happened to record an EMP at the exact same time that the ground >>>under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera. >> >> They don't use AM for helicopter to ground station for video >And your evidence is what? They obviously had to use AM because nothing >else could have caught the EMP at the exact same time a nuke shook the North >Tower so hard the North Tower shook like a tuning fork and was even recocord >on video. DUH Except there was no EMP. Proof of that is they recorded the tower after that interference event. Oh, they still don't use AM for link video. >> No matter, the transmitter and receiver would have been wiped out, AM or >> not. >Once again you have been watching too many bugs bunny cartoons or cartoons >from NIST because a real EMP weapon has to be detonated in the atmosphere >and not 77 meters underground. It is true that a ground level or underground nuke has a shorter EMP range than an aerial one. A small ground level nuke has an EMP range of only 10 miles, while Starfish Prime affected Hawaii nearly 1000 miles away. Now tell us what a 10 mile range EMP would have done to NYC. Forget about the fried video cameras and crashing helicopters, tell us what would happen to the rest of NYC! >> What is >> relevant are the many seismograph readings that did record the collapse >> (likely including the shaking) as a 2.3 magnitude quake but no nuclear >> detonation signature, thus disproving any nuke use. >And the seismograph reading also don't show the North Tower shaking like a >tuning fork so they show clear evidence of being falsified. The two "earthquakes" lasted several seconds, long enough to record the shaking and the collapse itself. But still no nuclear explosion signature! >>>> 3) No nuclear fireball/mushroom cloud. >> >>>Deep underground nukes don't have much of a fireball or mushroom cloud >>>incase you didn't know. And the Twin Towers have enough of a mushroom >>>cloud >>>to say nukes. >> >> They do if they break through the ground, which they would have to do in >> order to "vaporize" the towers. But there were no fireballs and no >> mushroom clouds spreading radiation everywhere. So no nukes. >ROTFLMAO because you can use the following site to see there are >consistencies in the mushroom cloud from Ground Zero and a mushroom cloud >from an underground nuke. >><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm>< Still no fireball creating any mushroom cloud. >>>> 4) No nuclear detonation signature shock on any seismometers. >> >>>ROTFLMAO because the ground shook so violently 12 seconds before the North >>>Tower was vaporized it was caught on camera but that shaking was not >>>caught >>>on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. No nuclear detonation signature shock on *any* seismometers. Any. Including ones the USGS had no access to, or even knew about. None. The shaking was recorded as part of the 2.3 magnitude earthquake. But still no nuclear detonation signature shock. >> What about all the other seismographs worldwide that the USGS had no >> control over? You never answered this, because you can't. No nuclear >> detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, worldwide), so no nuclear >> detonation. They did record all the shaking/collapse as a 2.3 magnitude >> quake, however. >Just stick to the facts that were the North Tower shook like a Tuning Fork >and people that felt it described it the exact same way they would decribe a >5.5 quake proving that all the seismic readings could be bogus. And if the >people really behind 9/11 were international terrorist they could fix every >single seismic reading. Nope, the fact is there was no nuclear detonation signature shock recorded *anywhere*, and it would be completely impossible to "fix" every single seismometer in the entire world. They wouldn't even know where they all were! >>>Given that NIST, NORAD, FAA, EPA and other government agencies have lied >>>about Ground Zero why not the USGS too? >> >> Irrelevant. No nuclear detonation signature (on *any* seismograph, >> worldwide), so no nuclear detonation. USGS can't change that no matter >> how much they may have wanted to lie about anything. >BULLSHIT the fact the North Tower shook so violently it was caught on camera >and at the same time another camera caught an explosion proves the seismic >reading are bullshit just like the rumor of the Twin Towers collapsing to >the ground or jet in Nuke York City are proven by the fact the only debris >on the ground is consistant with a bulding less than 10 floors high instead >of 110 stories tall. Again, the shaking was recorded as part of the 2.3 magnitude quake. The fact remains there was no nuclear detonation signature on *any* seismograph in the entire world. >> Why such a k00ky Wikipedia URL? Is it because that article wouldn't last >> 5 seconds as a normal Wikipedia article before all the falsehoods were >> corrected? But it could exist by itself in some kooktard's sandbox? >And yet you can't find anything wrong with it so you have to rely on others? That site is so kooktarded I had no idea where to start. Probably the most ridiculous part of it is setting off a 150kT nuke only 77m deep (and 50m below a basement) and *not* expect it to blow out, spewing radiation everywhere as a fireball rises 12,000 feet in the air. Remember the 104kT Sedan shot was 635 feet deep and it blew out, spewing radiation everywhere. >>>> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves >>>> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and >>>> dust. >> >>>ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive >>>dirt >>>hauled out. >> >> I already accounted for your 120 truckloads of dirt. 108,342 truckloads >> hauled out minus 120 truckloads that were brought in = 108,222 truckloads >> of actual debris hauled out. How do you explain 108,222 truckloads of >> debris (1.5 million tons!) if the towers were vaporized, k00k? >All you have to do is look at the remains of the Twin Towers to see very >little of that could have been from the Twin Towers themselves. DUH. I saw lots of debris. Remember, up to street level is 70 feet deep. Witnesses such as a doctor called in to amputate the leg of a trapped victim on the first day described the debris as 80-100' above that. >>>And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers because >>>photos prove there was next to nothing left of the Twin Towers. >> >> There's a lot of debris there (including lots of metal), k00k! Why >> don't you look at your own picture!! >Dude the walls that were left standing of the Twin Towers were from 6 to 8 >floors high. If the debris had come down instead of floating away the >debris pile itself would have been much higher than the walls that were left >standing. >The debris left is only consistant with a 10 story building and not a 110 >story building so what happened to the debris from the other 100 floors? ><G> The debris rising to about concourse level of the tower would be 70 feet deep. They still hauled out 108,342 truckloads, 1.5 million tons, over about 8 months. That's pretty much what you'd expect from the site. >> There are a zillion videos of the towers collapsing, k00k. They all show >> the towers collapsing from the impact floors down, not the bottom up. >> And none of those videocams were disabled by EMPs! None! >But if you think they collapsed all the way to the ground you are really an >idiot especially after I've furnished proof that the falling debris couldn't >crush the walls that were left standing or the dozen or so people that >survived inside of Stairwell B of the North Tower because that debris was >ultra fine and floated away just as numerous photos show. DUH Yet it did fall down. Your picture shows the debris reaching concourse level, which is about right for 110 stories of 95% air collapsing down to about 70 feet or so. >>>> 8) Those firefighters videoing from the inside of one of the towers >>>> *while >>>> it was collapsing* weren't nuked. >> >>>Sadly not all the illnesses caused by radiation show up right away but >>>there >>>is plenty of things on the internet about "9//11 radiation" now. >> >> How can there be any radiation sickness if it's known for fact there was >> no radiation? I'm not discounting many people got sick, cancer etc. from >> the toxic smoke, asbestos, dust (silicosis), fumes and so forth at >> the site. We know that it wasn't from radiation. >Where the fcuk do you come up with that no radiation bullshit? There simply was no radiation. Slightly above background, that's it. No radiation, no radiation sickness. Those people got sick from the smoke or asbestos. >And the alleged "Ice Age Pothole" where another nuke was detonated was >filled with concrete to try and keep that radition down too. That itty bitty pothole? 104kt nukes leave 1280' craters, not little potholes. >PLUS LOOK WHAT THEY PUT AT GROUND ZERO!!! They put great big water >fountains up to try and wash away any remaining radition. DUH. That's totally stupid, even for a k00ktard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-C723F9.00035001092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #518347 |
In article <ms3hbs$uaq$1@pcls7.std.com>, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > >news:ms1q4g$cud$1@pcls7.std.com... > > >>>And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation > >>>Area?" > >> > >> Except there wasn't. > > >riiight. Too bad you have no supporting evidence. > > Can't prove a negative, k00ktard. Besides, you made the outlandish claim, > the burden of proof is on you. http://www.lolhappens.com/276885/internet-argument/ -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrte21$j3t$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517648 |
On 8/29/2015 11:32 AM, Rocky wrote: >>>>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma >>>>> City was nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do >>>>> the >>>>> exact same >>>>> thing. >>>>> >>>>> NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE, AMERICANS HAVE DIED AND OUR GOVERNMENT >>>>> HAS LIED >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ManBoobs.com/Rocky/thelyingSquerrily >>>> Bwahahahaaa! Poor paranoid delusional schizophrenic kook is off his >>>> meds and seeing nuclear detonations everywhere... >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass >>> or if one were used on the North Tower. >>> Now back to the link above. Do you really think fertilizer bombs can >>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire >>> bombs? >>> Do you really think a collapse of the Twin Towers can take the top >>> 100+ floors of the Twin Towers and have them land somewhere else besides >>> the area where they once stood? See: >>> http://www.DeformedManBoobs.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Buttblast3.jpeg >>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin Towers >>> were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. >>> >>> Rocky >> >> no it doesn't > > Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. > > Rocky > where is your evidence of radiation? that would prove it was a nuke.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7m39bc-taf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517642 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass or if > one were used on the North Tower. Maybe, maybe not, but the thousands of different people running the seismographs all over the planet do, you bat shit crazy kook. <snip remaining rediculous kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <27e1bae1-f92e-4da9-a882-66c131d493dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #517655 |
On Saturday, August 29, 2015 at 9:46:16 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > > ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass or if > > one were used on the North Tower. > > Maybe, maybe not, but the thousands of different people running the > seismographs all over the planet do, you bat shit crazy kook. > > <snip remaining rediculous kook babble> > > > -- > Jim Pennino USA will be under the same pressure as Isreal.Twin Towers proves this to be reality.Searching for bombs at airports,gov. building makes sure we can not forget 9/11 Cross country airplanes make a very big bomb.Lasting high heat,and the Towers came melting down.It was an explosion ,implosion. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <3075ba40a81504443eaa03f0b52b6a9f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517642 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:iMWdnd8dHspAS3zInZ2dnUU7-eWdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), >> in <news:R-ednWcwutGj833InZ2dnUU7-dednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly >> jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City was >>> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact >>> same >>> thing. >>> >>> NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE, AMERICANS HAVE DIED AND OUR GOVERNMENT HAS >>> LIED >>> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/10/gordon-duff-nuclear-terror-the-khalezov-effect-video/ >> Bwahahahaaa! Poor paranoid delusional schizophrenic kook is off his >> meds and seeing nuclear detonations everywhere... > RO<SMACKAKOOK!> No matter how much you blather and stomp your retarded little feet, it doesn't change the fact that *you* *are* *wrong*... your broken brain believing in your utterly impossible conspiracy theory means you're a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional kook off his meds, Michael Scott Guthrie. Take your meds, Mike. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 19 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 19 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <th54ua58g2t3hpikt1t2s8d79il07n1k8s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517642 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:01:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass Something certainly has bitten you squarely on the ass. You have ZERO room to laugh since you can't answer the question I posed to you over a week ago about the 'physics package' of your imaginary nukes at the WTC. Somehow you find that a "loaded" question. And where did the passengers from Flight 77 go, Rock/Michael? You're falling behind on answering very basic questions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) |
| Message-ID | <EeKdndFPxOZD2n_InZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517715 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:th54ua58g2t3hpikt1t2s8d79il07n1k8s@4ax.com... > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:01:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass > > Something certainly has bitten you squarely on the ass. You have ZERO > room > to laugh since you can't answer the question I posed to you over a week > ago > about the 'physics package' of your imaginary nukes at the WTC. Somehow > you > find that a "loaded" question. Oh, talking about your physics package. Why is it physics do not support the Official Story? See: 9/11 - A Short Physics Lesson - Buildings Don't Just Dissolve https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOWkseSmfBQ > And where did the passengers from Flight 77 go, Rock/Michael? The proper question would be where did the passengers from Flight 77 come from since it wasn't even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. > You're falling behind on answering very basic questions. And at the same time you fail to answer my question about what did your husband see and don't tell me what he thought he saw either. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) |
| Message-ID | <1gi4ua1akcgi53i6aid7n7sndbfhq6v6e4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517744 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:00:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:th54ua58g2t3hpikt1t2s8d79il07n1k8s@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:01:19 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>ROTFLMAO because you wouldn't know a nuke if one bit you in the ass >> >> Something certainly has bitten you squarely on the ass. You have ZERO room >> to laugh since you can't answer the question I posed to you over a week ago >> about the 'physics package' of your imaginary nukes at the WTC. Somehow you >> find that a "loaded" question. > >Oh, talking about your physics package. You've never answered my question. You claim to know all about nukes yet you fail miserably on even the simplest questions. Believe me, my question was tailored to your, very simple and direct. And here we are a week+ on in time and you're still avoiding it. >> And where did the passengers from Flight 77 go, Rock/Michael? > >The proper question would be Why can't you answer the question? Where is Barbara Olsen and the other passengers on Flight 77 ? >> You're falling behind on answering very basic questions. > >And at the same time you fail to answer my question about what did your >husband see I told you what he saw, Rocky/Michael. Did you locate the heliport at the Pentagon yet, Rocky/Michael? It's got a big "H" on it and it's right next to the entry hole of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. LOL You ate a shit sandwich on that topic. >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) |
| Message-ID | <8JadnWmp2vWi_n_InZ2dnUU7-dGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517747 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:1gi4ua1akcgi53i6aid7n7sndbfhq6v6e4@4ax.com... > > Did you locate the heliport at the Pentagon yet, Rocky/Michael? It's got > a > big "H" on it and it's right next to the entry hole of Flight 77 into the > Pentagon. I'm not eating that bullshit from you either because the heliport and the big hole in the Pentagon were in two different locations and you can verify that for yourself. But you have got an interesting point. A white plane did crash at the heliport and there were witnesses to the event that were verified by remaining debris. But Flight 77 would not be called white plane if anybody had a close look at it. Duh. BTW the big hole in the Pentagon lacked a debris field so the witnesses to a 757 flying into that small hole were either crisis actors or lie-witnesses. See: 9/11 - INSIDE JOB! The Plane DOES NOT FIT in that hole ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Cm-_mY_Q8 > You ate a shit sandwich on that topic. Nope, didn't eat your shit about the heliport being "right next to the entry hole of Flight 77." <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) |
| Message-ID | <8nqf3l.v1n.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517767 |
Rocky wrote: > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:1gi4ua1akcgi53i6aid7n7sndbfhq6v6e4@4ax.com... >> >> Did you locate the heliport at the Pentagon yet, Rocky/Michael? >> It's got a >> big "H" on it and it's right next to the entry hole of Flight 77 >> into the Pentagon. > > I'm not eating that bullshit from you either because the heliport and > the big hole in the Pentagon were in two different locations and you > can verify that for yourself. > > But you have got an interesting point. A white plane did crash at the > heliport and there were witnesses to the event that were verified by > remaining debris. > > But Flight 77 would not be called white plane if anybody had a close > look at it. Duh. > > BTW the big hole in the Pentagon lacked a debris field so the > witnesses to a 757 flying into that small hole were either crisis > actors or lie-witnesses. See: > > 9/11 - INSIDE JOB! The Plane DOES NOT FIT in that hole ! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Cm-_mY_Q8 > > >> You ate a shit sandwich on that topic. > > Nope, didn't eat your shit about the heliport being "right next to > the entry hole of Flight 77." <G> > > Rocky you're never right
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) |
| Message-ID | <5jq4uad47ut0dc65na829g4q3lvkdmk97g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517767 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:57:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:1gi4ua1akcgi53i6aid7n7sndbfhq6v6e4@4ax.com... >> >> Did you locate the heliport at the Pentagon yet, Rocky/Michael? It's got >> a big "H" on it and it's right next to the entry hole of Flight 77 into the >> Pentagon. > >I'm not eating that bullshit from you either because the heliport and the >big hole in the Pentagon were in two different locations and you can verify >that for yourself. I have verified it Rocky/Michael. The Helipad and Flight 77's entry point are next to each other. Here are two images of the heliport next to the point of entry. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nfm4f64g5bhcs2s/Helipad%2Cjpg.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/r6tuois0tipg1wi/pentagon-path-marker.jpg?dl=0 >> You ate a shit sandwich on that topic. > >Nope, Chew that shit sandwich slowly, Rocky/Michael. :) >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) |
| Message-ID | <4u9abc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517767 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > I'm not eating that bullshit from you either because the heliport and the > big hole in the Pentagon were in two different locations and you can verify > that for yourself. If by two different locations you mean a few yards apart, you howlingly mad, delusional nut case. <snip remaining delusional babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) |
| Message-ID | <fvj5uahk5crm09uot8o9sc0bn6g3d2k3rp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517767 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:57:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:1gi4ua1akcgi53i6aid7n7sndbfhq6v6e4@4ax.com...
>>
>> Did you locate the heliport at the Pentagon yet, Rocky/Michael? It's got
>> a
>> big "H" on it and it's right next to the entry hole of Flight 77 into the
>> Pentagon.
>
>I'm not eating that bullshit from you either because the heliport and the
>big hole in the Pentagon were in two different locations and you can verify
>that for yourself.
>
Anyone can, and see that your mental illness prevents you from
accepting the truth.
To make things easy on you:
http://members.shaw.ca/freedomseven/pentagon-path-marker.jpg
http://cdn.historycommons.org/images/events/317_pentagon_approach.jpg
There are many more images, of course. But two is enough to prove
your claims to be the mentally ill delusions they are.
>But you have got an interesting point. A white plane did crash at the
>heliport and there were witnesses to the event that were verified by
>remaining debris.
>
>But Flight 77 would not be called white plane if anybody had a close look at
>it. Duh.
Why not?
Here is one item of the skin of the plane. It looks white to me.
http://911review.com/spencer/markup/spencer05_files/airlinewreckage.jpg
The same piece at a different angle, so you can't claim lighting
is causing an optical illusion.
http://cdn.historycommons.org/images/events/a853_pentagon_debris_2050081722-21381.jpg
>
>BTW the big hole in the Pentagon lacked a debris field so the witnesses to a
>757 flying into that small hole were either crisis actors or lie-witnesses.
>See:
>
>9/11 - INSIDE JOB! The Plane DOES NOT FIT in that hole !
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Cm-_mY_Q8
>
The plane fits the size of the hole very well. A k00k video isn't
evidence to the contrary.
>
>> You ate a shit sandwich on that topic.
>
>Nope, didn't eat your shit about the heliport being "right next to the entry
>hole of Flight 77." <G>
Pictures prove her claim. No amount of your delusions will ever
alter this truth.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) |
| Message-ID | <011a06e92637fee986f5c4ee5efed774@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517767 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind), in <news:8JadnWmp2vWi_n_InZ2dnUU7-dGdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:1gi4ua1akcgi53i6aid7n7sndbfhq6v6e4@4ax.com... >> Did you locate the heliport at the Pentagon yet, Rocky/Michael? It's got >> a big "H" on it and it's right next to the entry hole of Flight 77 into the >> Pentagon. > I'm not eating that bullshit from you either because the heliport and the > big hole in the Pentagon were in two different locations and you can verify > that for yourself. And if you've ever played billiards, you'd know how physics works... try a bank shot off the pool table shoulder at the exact angle of the plane hitting the Pentagon... and note the direction it takes after colliding with the table bumper... that matches exactly the debris path. Moron. LOL > But you have got an interesting point. A white plane di<SMACKAKOOK!> 1) Albert Hemphill: At the Navy Annex, "peering out of the window looking at the Pentagon.... the large silver cylinder of an aircraft appeared in my window, coming over my right shoulder as I faced the West side of the Pentagon directly towards the heliport. The aircraft, looking to be either a 757 or Airbus, seemed to come directly over the annex, as if it had been following Columbia Pike." 2) Terry Morin (at the Annex): "The aircraft was essentially right over the top of me and the outer portion of the FOB (flight path parallel the outer edge of the FOB). The plane had a silver body with red and blue stripes down the fuselage." 3) Alan Wallace (firefighter at the Pentagon helipad): "The plane had two big engines, appeared to be in level flight, and was only approximately 25 feet off the ground and only about 200 YARDS from our location. The airplane appeared to be a Boeing 757 or an Air Bus 320- white with blue and orange stripes. Mark later recalled the plane was silver and even identified that it was American Airlines. 4) Penny Elgas(headed north on Route 27, almost in front of the Pentagon): "I heard a rumble, looked out my driver's side window and realized that I was looking at the nose of an airplane coming straight at us from over the road (Columbia Pike) that runs perpendicular to the road I was on. The plane just appeared there - very low in the air, to the side of (and not much above) the CITGO gas station that I never knew was there." <http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/> <http://i962.photobucket.com/albums/ae107/sniperNZSAS/77-1.jpg> <https://www.youtube.com/user/cjnewson88> The "white plane" was the C-130 out of Andrews AFB piloted by Lt. Col. Steven O'Brien of the Minnesota National Guard, on its way to Minneapolis and diverted to intercept AA 77. It's actually light grey, but against the dark clouds of the sky that morning, it looked lighter in color. The C-130 flight crew saw AA 77 hit the Pentagon, and have very clear video of it, although that video isn't for public consumption. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ag6brfWro> Moron. LOL > But Flight 77 would not be called white plane if anybody had a close look at > it. Duh. Except for the white engines. And the white belly fairing. And the white front edges of the wings. And the white on the tail. Moron. LOL > BTW the big hole in the Pentagon lacked a debris field Bullshit. There was debris everywhere, you lying kook. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWKBzeE4mcM> Moron. LOL > s<SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. LOL >> You ate a shit sandwich on that topic. > N<SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 20 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. 20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 20 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) |
| Message-ID | <Utydne6gavopzH7InZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517917 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:011a06e92637fee986f5c4ee5efed774@dizum.com... >> BTW the big hole in the Pentagon lacked a debris field > > Bullshit. There was debris everywhere, you lying kook. > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWKBzeE4mcM> ROTFLMAO because now focus your attention on the debris field right after the alleged impact instead of after they pulled out sorts of shit out trucks and spread it around for a photo op.. In other words your video is bullshit because it does not deal with the immediate aftermath of the alleged jet that never even took off on 9/11. See: Dr. Morgan Reynolds - The Fake Planes of 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4d2Mt2a6iM And do not forget that one of the war games our military was playing on 9/11/01 used bogus blips on the radar and in the following you can even hear someone in the tower begging to have the bogus blips turned off. He says: "Hey turn the sim switches off don't give me that crap" at about 25 seconds into the following. "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmM4Tra-rg0 Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web