Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #510693 > unrolled thread

Re: Rogue wave theory to save ships

Started by"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
First post2015-08-01 14:51 -0700
Last post2015-08-01 22:38 +0000
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Rogue wave theory to save ships "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 14:51 -0700
    Re: Rogue wave theory to save ships "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 17:42 -0700
      Re: Rogue wave theory to save ships jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-02 01:29 +0000
      Re: Rogue wave theory to save ships benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 02:03 -0400
    Re: Rogue wave theory to save ships jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-01 22:38 +0000

#510693 — Re: Rogue wave theory to save ships

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-01 14:51 -0700
SubjectRe: Rogue wave theory to save ships
Message-ID<0ab92c0c-c107-4b8a-8b6d-d8de4fdf9591@googlegroups.com>
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 1:39:37 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
> On 7/30/2015 8:48 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > Rogue wave theory to save ships
> >> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-rogue-theory-ships.html
> 
> <snip FAICMSU>
> 
> >> Rogue ocean waves develop apparently out of nowhere over the course
> >> of about a minute and grow to as much as 40 metres in height before
> >> disappearing as quickly as they appeared.
> >
> >
> >    Reber's ship might not sink, but I fear he will be swept away never
> >    to be heard from again.
> >
> 
> The rogue wave is not the problem as he will stay on top, the problem is 
> the rogue valley in the waves, part of rogue waves but the other phase, 
>   where the water goes down 40 meters almost instantioulsy.

Gilber rogue wave my put me down,but keep in mind what goes down must come up as long as it has + bouyancy.(boat)  You will see post done by Treb if I have - bouyancy   I will not fade away I am a young thinker. TreBert

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#510716

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-01 17:42 -0700
Message-ID<c3ceddde-9675-444b-9fde-778b2eb9230e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#510693
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:51:39 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 1:39:37 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
> > On 7/30/2015 8:48 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > Rogue wave theory to save ships
> > >> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-rogue-theory-ships.html
> > 
> > <snip FAICMSU>
> > 
> > >> Rogue ocean waves develop apparently out of nowhere over the course
> > >> of about a minute and grow to as much as 40 metres in height before
> > >> disappearing as quickly as they appeared.
> > >
> > >
> > >    Reber's ship might not sink, but I fear he will be swept away never
> > >    to be heard from again.
> > >
> > 
> > The rogue wave is not the problem as he will stay on top, the problem is 
> > the rogue valley in the waves, part of rogue waves but the other phase, 
> >   where the water goes down 40 meters almost instantioulsy.
> 
> Gilber rogue wave my put me down,but keep in mind what goes down must come up as long as it has + bouyancy.(boat)  You will see post done by Treb if I have - bouyancy   I will not fade away I am a young thinker. TreBert

Jim If its lighter than the water it displaces it will come up. Put your money where your mouth is.I have a boat that can hold 5 people.It looks nice,and took 4 hours to build for 73 bucks.I also has my invention.Motor that does not stir up water,make any noise and is fun to run.Can steer with it,and turn on a dime. My barrel boat that made full page is Micky Mouse in comparisin  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#510720

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-02 01:29 +0000
Message-ID<7d809c-5u8.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#510716
reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:51:39 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 1:39:37 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
>> > On 7/30/2015 8:48 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > > Rogue wave theory to save ships
>> > >> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-rogue-theory-ships.html
>> > 
>> > <snip FAICMSU>
>> > 
>> > >> Rogue ocean waves develop apparently out of nowhere over the course
>> > >> of about a minute and grow to as much as 40 metres in height before
>> > >> disappearing as quickly as they appeared.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    Reber's ship might not sink, but I fear he will be swept away never
>> > >    to be heard from again.
>> > >
>> > 
>> > The rogue wave is not the problem as he will stay on top, the problem is 
>> > the rogue valley in the waves, part of rogue waves but the other phase, 
>> >   where the water goes down 40 meters almost instantioulsy.
>> 
>> Gilber rogue wave my put me down,but keep in mind what goes down must come up as long as it has + bouyancy.(boat)  You will see post done by Treb if I have - bouyancy   I will not fade away I am a young thinker. TreBert
> 
> Jim If its lighter than the water it displaces it will come up. Put your money where your mouth is.I have a boat that can hold 5 people.It looks nice,and took 4 hours to build for 73 bucks.I also has my invention.Motor that does not stir up water,make any noise and is fun to run.Can steer with it,and turn on a dime. My barrel boat that made full page is Micky Mouse in comparisin  TreBert

Yep, the pieces, if lighter than water, will come back up after the
structure is crushed by tons of falling water.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#510732

Frombenj <nobody@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-02 02:03 -0400
Message-ID<Roivx.16656$bZ7.5709@fx03.iad>
In reply to#510716
On 08/01/2015 08:42 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:51:39 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 1:39:37 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
>>> On 7/30/2015 8:48 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>> Rogue wave theory to save ships
>>>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-rogue-theory-ships.html
>>>
>>> <snip FAICMSU>
>>>
>>>>> Rogue ocean waves develop apparently out of nowhere over the course
>>>>> of about a minute and grow to as much as 40 metres in height before
>>>>> disappearing as quickly as they appeared.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Reber's ship might not sink, but I fear he will be swept away never
>>>>     to be heard from again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The rogue wave is not the problem as he will stay on top, the problem is
>>> the rogue valley in the waves, part of rogue waves but the other phase,
>>>    where the water goes down 40 meters almost instantioulsy.
>>
>> Gilber rogue wave my put me down,but keep in mind what goes down must come up as long as it has + bouyancy.(boat)  You will see post done by Treb if I have - bouyancy   I will not fade away I am a young thinker. TreBert
>
> Jim If its lighter than the water it displaces it will come up. Put your money where your mouth is.I have a boat that can hold 5 people.It looks nice,and took 4 hours to build for 73 bucks.I also has my invention.Motor that does not stir up water,make any noise and is fun to run.Can steer with it,and turn on a dime. My barrel boat that made full page is Micky Mouse in comparisin  TreBert
>
Tell us about the new motor, Herb. Sounds like a great invention. We 
need to know more details. (Don't worry about patents! At your age what 
in hell would you do with the money anyway?)

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#510848

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-01 22:38 +0000
Message-ID<kcuv8c-4v7.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#510693
reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 1:39:37 PM UTC-7, gilber34 wrote:
>> On 7/30/2015 8:48 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > Rogue wave theory to save ships
>> >> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-rogue-theory-ships.html
>> 
>> <snip FAICMSU>
>> 
>> >> Rogue ocean waves develop apparently out of nowhere over the course
>> >> of about a minute and grow to as much as 40 metres in height before
>> >> disappearing as quickly as they appeared.
>> >
>> >
>> >    Reber's ship might not sink, but I fear he will be swept away never
>> >    to be heard from again.
>> >
>> 
>> The rogue wave is not the problem as he will stay on top, the problem is 
>> the rogue valley in the waves, part of rogue waves but the other phase, 
>>   where the water goes down 40 meters almost instantioulsy.
> 
> Gilber rogue wave my put me down,but keep in mind what goes down must come up as long as it has + bouyancy.(boat)  You will see post done by Treb if I have - bouyancy   I will not fade away I am a young thinker. TreBert

Not if what goes down is crushed by several tons of water, but it is
academic as threre is no boat.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web