Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #523501 > unrolled thread

9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 16:47 -0500
    Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 18:41 -0400
      Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-27 21:23 -0400
        Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-27 20:29 -0500
        Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-27 22:07 -0400
          Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-28 09:29 -0400
            Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 09:48 -0500
              Re: Rocky beyond help jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-28 17:47 +0000
    Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-27 23:02 +0000
    Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 03:30 -0500
      Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 06:42 -0500
        Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-28 19:58 +0100
          Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
        Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 15:50 -0500
        Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-28 18:05 -0400
          Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 23:18 -0400
            Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 00:39 -0400
              Re: 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 18:41 -0400

#523501 — 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001

9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001

Published on Apr 25, 2014

On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers 
found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade 
complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the 
claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official 
investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo

=============================

And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of 
evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when 
nothing else could.

Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence pointing to 
the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured out the Hijacker 
Evidence was planted from the start.

Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent with 
real airplane wrecks.

And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real 
airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that couldn't 
even keep their wings on in flight.

What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete control of 
the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#523503

Rocky wrote:
> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>
> Published on Apr 25, 2014
>
> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
> found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
> complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
> claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
> investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>
> =============================
>
> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes
> when nothing else could.
>
> Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence
> pointing to the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured
> out the Hijacker Evidence was planted from the start.
>
> Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent
> with real airplane wrecks.
>
> And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real
> airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that
> couldn't even keep their wings on in flight.
>
> What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete
> control of the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.
>
> Rocky




FAUX news, always offering comedy gold. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523524

In article <mu9r6e$9d9$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> Rocky wrote:
> > 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
> >
> > Published on Apr 25, 2014
> >
> > On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
> > found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
> > complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
> > claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
> > investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
> >
> > =============================
> >
> > And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
> > evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes
> > when nothing else could.
> >
> > Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence
> > pointing to the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured
> > out the Hijacker Evidence was planted from the start.
> >
> > Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent
> > with real airplane wrecks.
> >
> > And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real
> > airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that
> > couldn't even keep their wings on in flight.
> >
> > What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete
> > control of the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.
> >
> > Rocky
> 
> 
> 
> 
> FAUX news, always offering comedy gold. 

Troofer sites, almost as "FAUX" as Fox is. Almost.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523526

"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message 
news:MPG.307260aa63b8331b98c2ec@news.giganews.com...
> In article <mu9r6e$9d9$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>
>> Rocky wrote:
>> > 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>> >
>> > Published on Apr 25, 2014
>> >
>> > On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
>> > found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
>> > complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of 
>> > the
>> > claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any 
>> > official
>> > investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>> >
>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>> >
>> > =============================
>> >
>> > And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>> > evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes
>> > when nothing else could.
>> >
>> > Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence
>> > pointing to the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured
>> > out the Hijacker Evidence was planted from the start.
>> >
>> > Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent
>> > with real airplane wrecks.
>> >
>> > And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with 
>> > real
>> > airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that
>> > couldn't even keep their wings on in flight.
>> >
>> > What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete
>> > control of the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 
>> > 9/11.
>> >
>> > Rocky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> FAUX news, always offering comedy gold.
>
> Troofer sites, almost as "FAUX" as Fox is. Almost.

No, not troofers just people that never fell for planted evidence or stories 
that are inconsistent with real life like the 757 that attacked the Pentagon 
folded it's wings back so it could fly into the Pentagon without even 
leaving an engine outside of the Pentagon..  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523528

BDK wrote:
> In article <mu9r6e$9d9$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>
>> Rocky wrote:
>>> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>>>
>>> Published on Apr 25, 2014
>>>
>>> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting
>>> searchers found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the
>>> World Trade complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown
>>> or seen of the claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never
>>> mentioned in any official investigation. Somebody was telling fat
>>> plane lies.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>>>
>>> =============================
>>>
>>> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>>> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes
>>> when nothing else could.
>>>
>>> Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence
>>> pointing to the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured
>>> out the Hijacker Evidence was planted from the start.
>>>
>>> Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent
>>> with real airplane wrecks.
>>>
>>> And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with
>>> real airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs
>>> that couldn't even keep their wings on in flight.
>>>
>>> What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete
>>> control of the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before
>>> 9/11.
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> FAUX news, always offering comedy gold.
>
> Troofer sites, almost as "FAUX" as Fox is. Almost.






Careful there boy.
FAUX news is one of the biggest supporters of your "official" 9/11 
fairytale.
You wouldn't want to be mistaken for a "TRUTHER" would you ???


Even if you don't care,....we "truthers" really would never want you to 
swing over to our side.
You do a plenty good enough job making us look good, as it is. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523563

In article <mua78r$669$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> BDK wrote:
> > In article <mu9r6e$9d9$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> >>
> >> Rocky wrote:
> >>> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
> >>>
> >>> Published on Apr 25, 2014
> >>>
> >>> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting
> >>> searchers found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the
> >>> World Trade complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown
> >>> or seen of the claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never
> >>> mentioned in any official investigation. Somebody was telling fat
> >>> plane lies.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
> >>>
> >>> =============================
> >>>
> >>> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
> >>> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes
> >>> when nothing else could.
> >>>
> >>> Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence
> >>> pointing to the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured
> >>> out the Hijacker Evidence was planted from the start.
> >>>
> >>> Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent
> >>> with real airplane wrecks.
> >>>
> >>> And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with
> >>> real airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs
> >>> that couldn't even keep their wings on in flight.
> >>>
> >>> What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete
> >>> control of the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before
> >>> 9/11.
> >>>
> >>> Rocky
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> FAUX news, always offering comedy gold.
> >
> > Troofer sites, almost as "FAUX" as Fox is. Almost.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Careful there boy.

I'm long past the "boy" stage. 

> FAUX news is one of the biggest supporters of your "official" 9/11 
> fairytale.

Even FAUX isnt crazy or stupid enough to fall for Troofery.

> You wouldn't want to be mistaken for a "TRUTHER" would you ???

As a person with a functioning brain, that's hardly likely.

> 
> 
> Even if you don't care,....we "truthers" really would never want you to 
> swing over to our side.

The only way that could happen is brain damage from a severe injury.

> You do a plenty good enough job making us look good, as it is. 

Only in your delusions, in reality, everyone who is sane makes you look 
stupid. Just like your fellow Troofers. You're pitiful in so many ways.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523569

"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message 
news:MPG.30730ae0821efa1598c2ee@news.giganews.com...
> In article <mua78r$669$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>
>> BDK wrote:
>> > In article <mu9r6e$9d9$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid 
>> > says...
>> >>
>> >> Rocky wrote:
>> >>> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>> >>>
>> >>> Published on Apr 25, 2014
>> >>>
>> >>> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting
>> >>> searchers found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the
>> >>> World Trade complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown
>> >>> or seen of the claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never
>> >>> mentioned in any official investigation. Somebody was telling fat
>> >>> plane lies.
>> >>>
>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>> >>>
>> >>> =============================
>> >>>
>> >>> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>> >>> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes
>> >>> when nothing else could.
>> >>>
>> >>> Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence
>> >>> pointing to the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured
>> >>> out the Hijacker Evidence was planted from the start.
>> >>>
>> >>> Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent
>> >>> with real airplane wrecks.
>> >>>
>> >>> And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with
>> >>> real airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs
>> >>> that couldn't even keep their wings on in flight.
>> >>>
>> >>> What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete
>> >>> control of the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before
>> >>> 9/11.
>> >>>
>> >>> Rocky
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> FAUX news, always offering comedy gold.
>> >
>> > Troofer sites, almost as "FAUX" as Fox is. Almost.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Careful there boy.
>
> I'm long past the "boy" stage.
>
>> FAUX news is one of the biggest supporters of your "official" 9/11
>> fairytale.
>
> Even FAUX isnt crazy or stupid enough to fall for Troofery.
>
>> You wouldn't want to be mistaken for a "TRUTHER" would you ???
>
> As a person with a functioning brain, that's hardly likely.
>
>>
>>
>> Even if you don't care,....we "truthers" really would never want you to
>> swing over to our side.
>
> The only way that could happen is brain damage from a severe injury.

Why you pick on people that can see inconsistencies in the 9/11 stories is 
beyond me.

And if the people that believe the official story ever told what they 
believed you would find they all have their own story just like Michael has 
his own story about what he thinks happened at the Pentagon.

And oddly enough Michael's story is inconsistent with the fact, any version 
of Mike Walter's story and a real crash of a 757.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523588 — Re: Rocky beyond help

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Why you pick on people that can see inconsistencies in the 9/11 stories is 
> beyond me.

Just about everything is beyond you, babbling kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523512

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
> 
> Published on Apr 25, 2014
> 
> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers 
> found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade 
> complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the 
> claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official 
> investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.

An obvious impossibility, but media talking heads know little of the
real world and just read what they are handed.

Either the report was garbled or someone lied from the start.

> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of 
> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when 
> nothing else could.

Not at all strange to sane people with an education and a functioning
brain.

> Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence pointing to 
> the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured out the Hijacker 
> Evidence was planted from the start.

Delusional nonsenses.

> Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent with 
> real airplane wrecks.

Actually, both were to sane people with an education and a functioning
brain.

> And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real 
> airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that couldn't 
> even keep their wings on in flight.

Both were consistent with real airplane wrecks to sane people with an
education and a functioning brain.

There were no CGIs.

> What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete control of 
> the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.

As you describe it:

You have to change the laws of physics.

You have to invent a nuclear device that can be buried under a building
and starts it's destruction from the top of the building down, and
stops at the building foundation.

You have to have control over every source of news on the planet, including
those in countries hostile to the USA.

You have to have control over every seismograph on the planet, including
those in countries hostile to the USA.

You have to have a budget of billions of dollars.

You have to have a support staff of many thousands.

You have to somehow keep the tens thousands of people normally on the
streets and sourounding buildings in New York out of the area.

You have to have a way to create CGIs in 2001 in less than many months.

You have to have a ready supply of wrecked airplanes and human body
parts.

There is more, but that is more than enough to come to the conclussion
that your "explanation" of 9/11 is pure fantasy.


 
-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523549

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:47:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>
>Published on Apr 25, 2014
>
>On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers 
>found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade 
>complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the 
>claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official 
>investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>
>=============================
>
>And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of 
>evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when 
>nothing else could.
>

     It's not the least bit strange to the educated and mentally
sound.

>Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence pointing to 
>the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured out the Hijacker 
>Evidence was planted from the start.

     But, as you have helped to prove, no evidence needed to be
planted. It's a very sad reality that your mental illness will not
permit you to accept this very simple truth.

>
>Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent with 
>real airplane wrecks.
>

     To the more mentally stable, both were. 

>And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real 
>airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that couldn't 
>even keep their wings on in flight.

     You've helped to prove there were real planes used. 

>
>What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete control of 
>the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.

     And yet, this has never occurred. Odd that.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523557

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:7iuh0bd2d08gglrpv9j4vgu5ffsp9k6le6@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:47:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>>
>>Published on Apr 25, 2014
>>
>>On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
>>found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
>>complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
>>claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
>>investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>>
>>=============================
>>
>>And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>>evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when
>>nothing else could.
>>
>
>     It's not the least bit strange to the educated and mentally
> sound.

Holy shit, you have been taking logic lessons from BKD because you are 
starting to avoid the facts just like he does.

Take a look at the different groups of people that do not believe the 
bullshit about 9/11.

They include Architects and Engineers, Firefighters, Scholars, people that 
deal with Nuclear Controlled Demolitions, people that work in the airline 
industry and you obviously don't fit into any category other than a bullshit 
believer.  <G>

Here, dig this video with one of the Firefighters for 9/11 truth.

"9/11 Myths Exposed By Firefighters, Architects & Engineers"-PublicTV-58min
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57kdlbdYILM

And to get to the part about the planted evidence in the above video start 
around 2:51.

FYI real jets do not fold up their wings to fly inside buildings.  Only 
birds or missiles can do that meaning anybody that fell for the bullshit 
about the Pentagon told to us by witnesses with 3 different stories is 
clearly brainwashed.

Real buildings need something to take them down other than fire and don't 
give me any shit about the CGIs weakened the Twin Towers first because NIST 
never said that so why should you or the Ediot?

And the funniest thing is, if WTC7 just vanished off the face of the earth 
you would still think fire took it down because the rate it came down it 
might have well just vanished.  See:

EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ

And there were videos of WTC7 where you could hear the alarms going off 
meaning WTC7 was going to be taken down and in one video there was even the 
alarm for a nuclear blast so not only did people know before hand that WTC7 
was going to be brought down they were even informed how it was going to be 
brought down.  <G>


********  O P  *******

9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001

Published on Apr 25, 2014

On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo

=============================

And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when
nothing else could.

Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence pointing to
the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured out the Hijacker
Evidence was planted from the start.

Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent with
real airplane wrecks.

And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real
airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that couldn't
even keep their wings on in flight.

What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete control of
the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523609

On 28/09/2015 12:42, Rocky wrote:
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7iuh0bd2d08gglrpv9j4vgu5ffsp9k6le6@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:47:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>>>
>>> Published on Apr 25, 2014
>>>
>>> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
>>> found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
>>> complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
>>> claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
>>> investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>>>
>>> =============================
>>>
>>> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>>> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when
>>> nothing else could.
>>>
>>
>>      It's not the least bit strange to the educated and mentally
>> sound.
>
> Holy shit, you have been taking logic lessons from BKD because you are
> starting to avoid the facts just like he does.
>
> Take a look at the different groups of people that do not believe the
> bullshit about 9/11.
>
> They include Architects and Engineers, Firefighters, Scholars, people that
> deal with Nuclear Controlled Demolitions,

I know that you will not give a credible answer, but I will ask all the 
same, name the person(s) who deal with NCD, please provide a link to 
them or their organization, and also provide details of, lets say three, 
ncd.

> people that work in the airline
> industry and you obviously don't fit into any category other than a bullshit
> believer.  <G>
>
> Here, dig this video with one of the Firefighters for 9/11 truth.
>
> "9/11 Myths Exposed By Firefighters, Architects & Engineers"-PublicTV-58min
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57kdlbdYILM
>
> And to get to the part about the planted evidence in the above video start
> around 2:51.
>
> FYI real jets do not fold up their wings to fly inside buildings.  Only
> birds or missiles can do that meaning anybody that fell for the bullshit
> about the Pentagon told to us by witnesses with 3 different stories is
> clearly brainwashed.
>
> Real buildings need something to take them down other than fire and don't
> give me any shit about the CGIs weakened the Twin Towers first because NIST
> never said that so why should you or the Ediot?
>
> And the funniest thing is, if WTC7 just vanished off the face of the earth
> you would still think fire took it down because the rate it came down it
> might have well just vanished.  See:
>
> EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ
>
> And there were videos of WTC7 where you could hear the alarms going off

What alarms were these, smoke, fire alarms, evacuation alarms, do you 
not expect such things?

> meaning WTC7 was going to be taken down and in one video there was even the
> alarm for a nuclear blast

What sort of alarm would that be, a nuclear blast alarm in an office 
building is at best a quaint idea?

> so not only did people know before hand that WTC7
> was going to be brought down they were even informed how it was going to be
> brought down.  <G>
>
>
> ********  O P  *******
>
> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>
> Published on Apr 25, 2014
>
> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
> found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
> complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
> claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
> investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>
> =============================
>
> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when
> nothing else could.
>
> Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence pointing to
> the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured out the Hijacker
> Evidence was planted from the start.
>
> Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent with
> real airplane wrecks.
>
> And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real
> airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that couldn't
> even keep their wings on in flight.
>
> What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete control of
> the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523700

On 28/09/2015 19:58, Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 28/09/2015 12:42, Rocky wrote:
>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:7iuh0bd2d08gglrpv9j4vgu5ffsp9k6le6@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:47:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>>>>
>>>> Published on Apr 25, 2014
>>>>
>>>> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
>>>> found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
>>>> complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of
>>>> the
>>>> claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any
>>>> official
>>>> investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>>>>
>>>> =============================
>>>>
>>>> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>>>> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes
>>>> when
>>>> nothing else could.
>>>>
>>>
>>>      It's not the least bit strange to the educated and mentally
>>> sound.
>>
>> Holy shit, you have been taking logic lessons from BKD because you are
>> starting to avoid the facts just like he does.
>>
>> Take a look at the different groups of people that do not believe the
>> bullshit about 9/11.
>>
>> They include Architects and Engineers, Firefighters, Scholars, people
>> that
>> deal with Nuclear Controlled Demolitions,
>
> I know that you will not give a credible answer, but I will ask all the
> same, name the person(s) who deal with NCD, please provide a link to
> them or their organization, and also provide details of, lets say three,
> ncd.
>
>> people that work in the airline
>> industry and you obviously don't fit into any category other than a
>> bullshit
>> believer.  <G>
>>
>> Here, dig this video with one of the Firefighters for 9/11 truth.
>>
>> "9/11 Myths Exposed By Firefighters, Architects &
>> Engineers"-PublicTV-58min
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57kdlbdYILM
>>
>> And to get to the part about the planted evidence in the above video
>> start
>> around 2:51.
>>
>> FYI real jets do not fold up their wings to fly inside buildings.  Only
>> birds or missiles can do that meaning anybody that fell for the bullshit
>> about the Pentagon told to us by witnesses with 3 different stories is
>> clearly brainwashed.
>>
>> Real buildings need something to take them down other than fire and don't
>> give me any shit about the CGIs weakened the Twin Towers first because
>> NIST
>> never said that so why should you or the Ediot?
>>
>> And the funniest thing is, if WTC7 just vanished off the face of the
>> earth
>> you would still think fire took it down because the rate it came down it
>> might have well just vanished.  See:
>>
>> EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ
>>
>> And there were videos of WTC7 where you could hear the alarms going off
>
> What alarms were these, smoke, fire alarms, evacuation alarms, do you
> not expect such things?
>
>> meaning WTC7 was going to be taken down and in one video there was
>> even the
>> alarm for a nuclear blast
>
> What sort of alarm would that be, a nuclear blast alarm in an office
> building is at best a quaint idea?
>
>> so not only did people know before hand that WTC7
>> was going to be brought down they were even informed how it was going
>> to be
>> brought down.  <G>
>>
>>
>> ********  O P  *******
>>
>> 9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>>
>> Published on Apr 25, 2014
>>
>> On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
>> found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
>> complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
>> claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
>> investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>>
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>>
>> =============================
>>
>> And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>> evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when
>> nothing else could.
>>
>> Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence
>> pointing to
>> the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured out the Hijacker
>> Evidence was planted from the start.
>>
>> Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent
>> with
>> real airplane wrecks.
>>
>> And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real
>> airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that
>> couldn't
>> even keep their wings on in flight.
>>
>> What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete
>> control of
>> the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>



No answer, as expected, Rocky running away again.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523635

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:42:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:7iuh0bd2d08gglrpv9j4vgu5ffsp9k6le6@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:47:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>9/11 Hijacker Body Found In Cockpit FOX Sept 13 2001
>>>
>>>Published on Apr 25, 2014
>>>
>>>On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers
>>>found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks south of the World Trade
>>>complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the
>>>claim. The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official
>>>investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1wJiffgBFo
>>>
>>>=============================
>>>
>>>And to this date the strangest part about 9/11 is where the trail of
>>>evidence came from and why the evidence could survive fiery episodes when
>>>nothing else could.
>>
>>     It's not the least bit strange to the educated and mentally
>> sound.
>
>Holy shit, you have been taking logic lessons from BKD because you are 
>starting to avoid the facts just like he does.
>

     Who is BKD? I've asked this of you MANY times, but you've never
offered an answer.
     Is this one of the voices in your head?

>Take a look at the different groups of people that do not believe the 
>bullshit about 9/11.
>

     Did you think you were alone in your delusions regarding 9/11?

>They include Architects and Engineers, Firefighters, Scholars, people that 
>deal with Nuclear Controlled Demolitions, 

     As of the time I write this, there has never been a nuclear
controlled demolition. As such, there can be no people who deal with
them.

>people that work in the airline 
>industry and you obviously don't fit into any category other than a bullshit 
>believer.  <G>

     How about the category of one who is able to accept the truth?
It's a classification you'll never become a part of. Which is very
sad.

>
>Here, dig this video with one of the Firefighters for 9/11 truth.
>
>"9/11 Myths Exposed By Firefighters, Architects & Engineers"-PublicTV-58min
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57kdlbdYILM
>

     And? The guy is a nut. What of it?

>And to get to the part about the planted evidence in the above video start 
>around 2:51.

     There was no planted evidence.

>
>>>Obviously the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to kill a lot of their evidence pointing to 
>>>the fictitious hijackers because too many people figured out the Hijacker 
>>>Evidence was planted from the start.
>>
>>     But, as you have helped to prove, no evidence needed to be
>>planted. It's a very sad reality that your mental illness will not
>>permit you to accept this very simple truth.
>>
>>>Neither the Pranksville, PA site or the Pentagon site were consistent with 
>>>real airplane wrecks.
>>>
>>
>>     To the more mentally stable, both were. 
>>


Roger?


>>>And neither the North Tower or the South Tower were consistent with real 
>>>airplane wrecks but they were consistent with very cheap CGIs that couldn't 
>>>even keep their wings on in flight.
>>
>>     You've helped to prove there were real planes used. 
>>


Roger?


>>>What would be needed to pull off a Hijacker Hoax Stunt?  Complete control of 
>>>the 6 major networks and that was achieved years before 9/11.
>>
>>     And yet, this has never occurred. Odd that.


Roger?


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#523658

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:42:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>FYI real jets do not fold up their wings to fly inside buildings.  Only 
>birds or missiles can do that meaning anybody that fell for the bullshit 
>about the Pentagon told to us by witnesses with 3 different stories is 
>clearly brainwashed.


1.  The US has several military aircraft which can either sweep back
or fold their wings.   

2.  Missiles do not fold their "wings" to fly into buildings.

3.  Missiles have folding fins so they can be launched out of launch
tubes.  

The only brainwashed people here are you and your equally insane
partner, Bast.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#525015

Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:42:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> FYI real jets do not fold up their wings to fly inside buildings.  Only
>> birds or missiles can do that meaning anybody that fell for the
>> bullshit about the Pentagon told to us by witnesses with 3 different
>> stories is clearly brainwashed.
>
>
> 1.  The US has several military aircraft which can either sweep back
> or fold their wings.



So are you claiming those military jets taught 757's to do it ???
That's what you get when you allow planes to date without chaperones.



>
> 2.  Missiles do not fold their "wings" to fly into buildings.



Especially not on 9/11 anywhere but I thought you claimed there were no 
missiles ????



>
> 3.  Missiles have folding fins so they can be launched out of launch
> tubes.



Wait a second ? which side are you on here,...as you are PROVING MY CASE FOR 
ME

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#525027

In article <mv23gh$svb$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:42:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> FYI real jets do not fold up their wings to fly inside buildings.  Only
> >> birds or missiles can do that meaning anybody that fell for the
> >> bullshit about the Pentagon told to us by witnesses with 3 different
> >> stories is clearly brainwashed.
> >
> >
> > 1.  The US has several military aircraft which can either sweep back
> > or fold their wings.
> 
> 
> 
> So are you claiming those military jets taught 757's to do it ???
> That's what you get when you allow planes to date without chaperones.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > 2.  Missiles do not fold their "wings" to fly into buildings.
> 
> 
> 
> Especially not on 9/11 anywhere but I thought you claimed there were no 
> missiles ????
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > 3.  Missiles have folding fins so they can be launched out of launch
> > tubes.
> 
> 
> 
> Wait a second ? which side are you on here,...as you are PROVING MY CASE FOR 
> ME

Your head must ring like a seashell from being so empty. The only thing 
proven is you're dumber than a rock.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#525156

>In article <mv23gh$svb$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>> 
>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:42:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> FYI real jets do not fold up their wings to fly inside buildings.  Only
>> >> birds or missiles can do that meaning anybody that fell for the
>> >> bullshit about the Pentagon told to us by witnesses with 3 different
>> >> stories is clearly brainwashed.
>> >
>> >
>> > 1.  The US has several military aircraft which can either sweep back
>> > or fold their wings.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> So are you claiming those military jets taught 757's to do it ???
>> That's what you get when you allow planes to date without chaperones.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> > 2.  Missiles do not fold their "wings" to fly into buildings.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Especially not on 9/11 anywhere but I thought you claimed there were no 
>> missiles ????

And what makes you think that's changed?  

>> >
>> > 3.  Missiles have folding fins so they can be launched out of launch
>> > tubes.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Wait a second ? which side are you on here,...as you are PROVING MY CASE FOR 
>> ME 

Nope.   If I was trying to sell your Troofer missile story hit the
Pentagon  I'd name a launch platform.

Since you refuse to name a launch platform your claim is without truth
or merit.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web