Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #896026 > unrolled thread

what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-01 08:56 -0700
    Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-01 23:28 -0700
      Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-02 01:53 -0700
        Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-06-03 00:39 -0700
        Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-08 00:07 -0700
          Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 06:24 -0600
            Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 08:30 -0700
              Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 08:42 -0700
                Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2026-06-08 20:38 +0000
      Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-02 06:33 -0600
        Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-06-02 19:55 +0200
      Re: what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-02 14:09 -0700

#896026 — what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth

https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/


what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?

Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.



It's very simple..
you pop in, you pop out.

or, you pop out, you pop in.


Okay, you are a golden retriever...


How did the universe get in here?

It popped in!

Okay, I'm talking to a dog.

Start with a simple definition:

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in


 in
/in/
preposition

    expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.


a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).



Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???


'In the beginning, ...' of course.


Now, how do you pop out from in?


Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"


Dog sez: "roof, roof!"


Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"



roof, roof!






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#896027

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
> 
> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
> 
> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
> 
> It's very simple..
> you pop in, you pop out.
> 
> or, you pop out, you pop in.
> 
> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
> 
> How did the universe get in here?
> 
> It popped in!
> 
> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
> 
> Start with a simple definition:
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
> 
>  in
> /in/
> preposition
> 
>     expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
> 
> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).
> 
> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
> 
> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
> 
> Now, how do you pop out from in?
> 
> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
> 
> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
> 
> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
> 
> roof, roof!


Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...

 "How did you get here?"


The alien would say..."I can give you the math."

The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"

The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896028

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
> >
> > what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
> >
> > Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
> >
> > It's very simple..
> > you pop in, you pop out.
> >
> > or, you pop out, you pop in.
> >
> > Okay, you are a golden retriever...
> >
> > How did the universe get in here?
> >
> > It popped in!
> >
> > Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
> >
> > Start with a simple definition:
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
> >
> >  in
> > /in/
> > preposition
> >
> >     expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
> >
> > a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).
> >
> > Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
> >
> > 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
> >
> > Now, how do you pop out from in?
> >
> > Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
> >
> > Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
> >
> > Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
> >
> > roof, roof!
> 
> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
> 
>  "How did you get here?"
> 
> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
> 
> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
> 
> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"


"How did you get here?"


I mean, it's very simple...


you pop out
walk a couple of blocks
pop in
and you are now at the other side of the universe!

you 'bypass' the stupid speed of light and time.



"bypass", look it up.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896032

On 06/02/2026 01:53 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
>>>
>>> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
>>>
>>> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
>>>
>>> It's very simple..
>>> you pop in, you pop out.
>>>
>>> or, you pop out, you pop in.
>>>
>>> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
>>>
>>> How did the universe get in here?
>>>
>>> It popped in!
>>>
>>> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
>>>
>>> Start with a simple definition:
>>>
>>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
>>>
>>>   in
>>> /in/
>>> preposition
>>>
>>>      expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
>>>
>>> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).
>>>
>>> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
>>>
>>> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
>>>
>>> Now, how do you pop out from in?
>>>
>>> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
>>>
>>> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
>>>
>>> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
>>>
>>> roof, roof!
>>
>> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
>>
>>   "How did you get here?"
>>
>> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
>>
>> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
>>
>> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
>
>
> "How did you get here?"
>
>
> I mean, it's very simple...
>
>
> you pop out
> walk a couple of blocks
> pop in
> and you are now at the other side of the universe!
>
> you 'bypass' the stupid speed of light and time.
>
>
>
> "bypass", look it up.
>
>
>
>
>

What it would take for aliens to reach Earth,
is the same as it would be for humans to reach Space.

Usually though the idea is to _hide_ Earth from most aliens.


Anyways a theory with real space-contraction makes for that
since there's to be different linear and rotational invariance,
so that the linear is Galilean while the rotational is not,
making for space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational,
then with "momentum" as for the "un-linear" not being conserved
(since it's immediately "lost in the wash" in any kinematic
system since there are no "perfect inelastic collisions" in nature)
then has that the terms of relativity theory and for that matter
mechanics already admit to ignorance "beyond the first order"
or "beyond the second order" variously, that's where the applicability
ends and that's yet all the "confirmations" ever say - there's
room in the formalism for the higher-order terms as simply as
for spinning bodies and heft, then for that "Dark Matter" gets
solved as courtesy _classical_ mechanics re-newed, and then "Dark
Energy" gets solved courtesy a modern theory of light itself,
then super-luminal motion lives in various models of "relativity"
theories, for example "doubly-objective relativity of motion
and also space", that since "gravity's speed is infinite",
the "light-speed limit" is a bit of a lie.


The usual idea isn't "what would it take for aliens to reach
Earth", it's, "what does it take to keep aliens away from Earth".


If you've never done a deep analysis of all the mathematical formalisms
and the relevant bodies of experiment, about not just "relativity
theory" which doesn't really say much except "tensors", yet also
_classical mechanics itself_, then you don't know.


See, according to 20'th century relativity theory: the picture of Earth
in the sky never actually points to the Earth itself.


Yet, how it does so is an account of "21'st century relativity
theory", which is doubly-objective so to reclaim some of what's
lost & missing from the severe reductionist account of gullible SR-ians.



Yeah, keep looking.



It involves real continuity and infinity,
so almost-all can be fooled that it's grainy
and just a few more than their fingers
(and even their toes, and other short appendages).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896057

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
> > >
> > > what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
> > >
> > > Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
> > >
> > > It's very simple..
> > > you pop in, you pop out.
> > >
> > > or, you pop out, you pop in.
> > >
> > > Okay, you are a golden retriever...
> > >
> > > How did the universe get in here?
> > >
> > > It popped in!
> > >
> > > Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
> > >
> > > Start with a simple definition:
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
> > >
> > >  in
> > > /in/
> > > preposition
> > >
> > >     expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
> > >
> > > a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).
> > >
> > > Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
> > >
> > > 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
> > >
> > > Now, how do you pop out from in?
> > >
> > > Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
> > >
> > > Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
> > >
> > > Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
> > >
> > > roof, roof!
> >
> > Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
> >
> >  "How did you get here?"
> >
> > The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
> >
> > The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
> >
> > The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
> 
> "How did you get here?"
> 
> I mean, it's very simple...
> 
> you pop out
> walk a couple of blocks
> pop in
> and you are now at the other side of the universe!
> 
> you 'bypass' the stupid speed of light and time.

Albert Einstein figured out how to 'bypass' his own speed of light...

"spooky action at a distance."

In 'science gargon' it's: 'When a mass moves, the force acting on other
masses had been considered to adjust instantaneously to the new location
of the displaced mass.'

In other words... make a rocketship invisible and transport it to
another place.



pop out
pop in


most of yous arrived on earth either by popping out or popping in.


I think it's time for some of yous to ...pop the fuck out of here!

to a spooky place... 






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896061

The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
>>>>
>>>> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
>>>>
>>>> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
>>>>
>>>> It's very simple..
>>>> you pop in, you pop out.
>>>>
>>>> or, you pop out, you pop in.
>>>>
>>>> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
>>>>
>>>> How did the universe get in here?
>>>>
>>>> It popped in!
>>>>
>>>> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
>>>>
>>>> Start with a simple definition:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
>>>>
>>>>   in
>>>> /in/
>>>> preposition
>>>>
>>>>      expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
>>>>
>>>> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).
>>>>
>>>> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
>>>>
>>>> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
>>>>
>>>> Now, how do you pop out from in?
>>>>
>>>> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
>>>>
>>>> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
>>>>
>>>> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
>>>>
>>>> roof, roof!
>>>
>>> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
>>>
>>>   "How did you get here?"
>>>
>>> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
>>>
>>> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
>>>
>>> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
>>
>> "How did you get here?"
>>
>> I mean, it's very simple...
>>
>> you pop out
>> walk a couple of blocks
>> pop in
>> and you are now at the other side of the universe!
>>
>> you 'bypass' the stupid speed of light and time.
> 
> Albert Einstein figured out how to 'bypass' his own speed of light...
> 
> "spooky action at a distance."
> 
> In 'science gargon' it's: 'When a mass moves, the force acting on other
> masses had been considered to adjust instantaneously to the new location
> of the displaced mass.'
> 
> In other words... make a rocketship invisible and transport it to
> another place.
> 
> 
> 
> pop out
> pop in
> 
> 
> most of yous arrived on earth either by popping out or popping in.
> 
> 
> I think it's time for some of yous to ...pop the fuck out of here!
> 
> to a spooky place...

Why do scientists rationally believe that 'folding space' is what's 
going to happen? Why not 'throwing monkeys in a furnace' or 'putting 
potatoes on a shelf' or 'paving the universe with asphalt?'

Why is 'folding space' the ridiculous, abstract, non-sequitur science of 
choice, science du jour?

It's still ridiculous science fiction. Give me a break.

-- 
The future has begun
The waiting is over
We have gained time
For one blink of an eye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896062

On 06/08/2026 05:24 AM, phoenix wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
>>>>>
>>>>> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's very simple..
>>>>> you pop in, you pop out.
>>>>>
>>>>> or, you pop out, you pop in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
>>>>>
>>>>> How did the universe get in here?
>>>>>
>>>>> It popped in!
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
>>>>>
>>>>> Start with a simple definition:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
>>>>>
>>>>>   in
>>>>> /in/
>>>>> preposition
>>>>>
>>>>>      expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be
>>>>> enclosed or surrounded by something else.
>>>>>
>>>>> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g.,
>>>>> “in the house”).
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
>>>>>
>>>>> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, how do you pop out from in?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
>>>>>
>>>>> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
>>>>>
>>>>> roof, roof!
>>>>
>>>> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
>>>>
>>>>   "How did you get here?"
>>>>
>>>> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
>>>>
>>>> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
>>>>
>>>> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
>>>
>>> "How did you get here?"
>>>
>>> I mean, it's very simple...
>>>
>>> you pop out
>>> walk a couple of blocks
>>> pop in
>>> and you are now at the other side of the universe!
>>>
>>> you 'bypass' the stupid speed of light and time.
>>
>> Albert Einstein figured out how to 'bypass' his own speed of light...
>>
>> "spooky action at a distance."
>>
>> In 'science gargon' it's: 'When a mass moves, the force acting on other
>> masses had been considered to adjust instantaneously to the new location
>> of the displaced mass.'
>>
>> In other words... make a rocketship invisible and transport it to
>> another place.
>>
>>
>>
>> pop out
>> pop in
>>
>>
>> most of yous arrived on earth either by popping out or popping in.
>>
>>
>> I think it's time for some of yous to ...pop the fuck out of here!
>>
>> to a spooky place...
>
> Why do scientists rationally believe that 'folding space' is what's
> going to happen? Why not 'throwing monkeys in a furnace' or 'putting
> potatoes on a shelf' or 'paving the universe with asphalt?'
>
> Why is 'folding space' the ridiculous, abstract, non-sequitur science of
> choice, science du jour?
>
> It's still ridiculous science fiction. Give me a break.
>

Well, first of all, you'd need a reasoning why information can go
any faster than the speed of light.

It's not an un-usual idea that gravity's speed is infinite, with
the idea that three objects in a row can send information to a
third object in the middle, which can move, then that thusly,
the destination can immediately detect the movement, gravitationally,
effectively doubling light speed ("guide lode").

Then, the space-time wheel, is after the idea that two systems
can't observe each other at light-speed, so they each rotate,
toward light speed, effectively halving light speed ("space-time wheel").


It's well-known that that solar system, for example, has that
the effective force of gravity always points at the source
not the image, so the speed of gravity is greater than the
speed of light, otherwise gravity would point at the image
not the source, and the solar system would fly apart.


Then, for real space-contraction then light speed is a value
that can be derived as basically twice aether drift velocity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896063

On 06/08/2026 08:30 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 06/08/2026 05:24 AM, phoenix wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's very simple..
>>>>>> you pop in, you pop out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> or, you pop out, you pop in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How did the universe get in here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It popped in!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Start with a simple definition:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   in
>>>>>> /in/
>>>>>> preposition
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be
>>>>>> enclosed or surrounded by something else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g.,
>>>>>> “in the house”).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, how do you pop out from in?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> roof, roof!
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
>>>>>
>>>>>   "How did you get here?"
>>>>>
>>>>> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
>>>>>
>>>>> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
>>>>>
>>>>> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
>>>>
>>>> "How did you get here?"
>>>>
>>>> I mean, it's very simple...
>>>>
>>>> you pop out
>>>> walk a couple of blocks
>>>> pop in
>>>> and you are now at the other side of the universe!
>>>>
>>>> you 'bypass' the stupid speed of light and time.
>>>
>>> Albert Einstein figured out how to 'bypass' his own speed of light...
>>>
>>> "spooky action at a distance."
>>>
>>> In 'science gargon' it's: 'When a mass moves, the force acting on other
>>> masses had been considered to adjust instantaneously to the new location
>>> of the displaced mass.'
>>>
>>> In other words... make a rocketship invisible and transport it to
>>> another place.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> pop out
>>> pop in
>>>
>>>
>>> most of yous arrived on earth either by popping out or popping in.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it's time for some of yous to ...pop the fuck out of here!
>>>
>>> to a spooky place...
>>
>> Why do scientists rationally believe that 'folding space' is what's
>> going to happen? Why not 'throwing monkeys in a furnace' or 'putting
>> potatoes on a shelf' or 'paving the universe with asphalt?'
>>
>> Why is 'folding space' the ridiculous, abstract, non-sequitur science of
>> choice, science du jour?
>>
>> It's still ridiculous science fiction. Give me a break.
>>
>
> Well, first of all, you'd need a reasoning why information can go
> any faster than the speed of light.
>
> It's not an un-usual idea that gravity's speed is infinite, with
> the idea that three objects in a row can send information to a
> third object in the middle, which can move, then that thusly,
> the destination can immediately detect the movement, gravitationally,
> effectively doubling light speed ("guide lode").
>
> Then, the space-time wheel, is after the idea that two systems
> can't observe each other at light-speed, so they each rotate,
> toward light speed, effectively halving light speed ("space-time wheel").
>
>
> It's well-known that that solar system, for example, has that
> the effective force of gravity always points at the source
> not the image, so the speed of gravity is greater than the
> speed of light, otherwise gravity would point at the image
> not the source, and the solar system would fly apart.
>
>
> Then, for real space-contraction then light speed is a value
> that can be derived as basically twice aether drift velocity.
>
>


Since setting up a mechanical system over many astronomical units
or parsecs is non-trivial, mostly it would depend on planetary
and solar axial alignments, about Moon-Earth, Earth-Sun, Sun-Polaris,
and so on, about when the planets and stars align, then as with
regards to the much, much wider surrounds of the galactic and
super-galactic about that, the projections and these kinds of things.


At least: it's conceptually simple notions of "guide lode" and
"space-time wheel", and furthermore science as it is today
doesn't make them simply farcical or "dis-proven".


Since Einstein's SR is local, then also light-speed is local.

That "there are no closed finite time-like curves", and so
no violation of causality or paradoxes of time, doesn't say
much about "closed infinitesimal time-like curves", which
basically reflect chance itself then for that clocks either
slow or meet, about real space-contraction.


"Astronomical units" and "parsecs" are both kinds of local, measures.
This also is already in the theory about differences between
"length" the metric and "distance" the norm, since usually enough
people forget they're not the same thing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896067

Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:XSudnX-0F_-bfrv3nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com: 

> On 06/08/2026 08:30 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 06/08/2026 05:24 AM, phoenix wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth
>>>>>>> -aerospace-engineer-did-math/ 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's very simple..
>>>>>>> you pop in, you pop out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> or, you pop out, you pop in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How did the universe get in here?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It popped in!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Start with a simple definition:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   in
>>>>>>> /in/
>>>>>>> preposition
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      expressing the situation of something that is or appears to
>>>>>>>      be 
>>>>>>> enclosed or surrounded by something else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g.,
>>>>>>> “in the house”).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, how do you pop out from in?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> roof, roof!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   "How did you get here?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
>>>>>
>>>>> "How did you get here?"
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, it's very simple...
>>>>>
>>>>> you pop out
>>>>> walk a couple of blocks
>>>>> pop in
>>>>> and you are now at the other side of the universe!
>>>>>
>>>>> you 'bypass' the stupid speed of light and time.
>>>>
>>>> Albert Einstein figured out how to 'bypass' his own speed of light...
>>>>
>>>> "spooky action at a distance."
>>>>
>>>> In 'science gargon' it's: 'When a mass moves, the force acting on
>>>> other masses had been considered to adjust instantaneously to the new
>>>> location of the displaced mass.'
>>>>
>>>> In other words... make a rocketship invisible and transport it to
>>>> another place.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> pop out
>>>> pop in
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> most of yous arrived on earth either by popping out or popping in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think it's time for some of yous to ...pop the fuck out of here!
>>>>
>>>> to a spooky place...
>>>
>>> Why do scientists rationally believe that 'folding space' is what's
>>> going to happen? Why not 'throwing monkeys in a furnace' or 'putting
>>> potatoes on a shelf' or 'paving the universe with asphalt?'
>>>
>>> Why is 'folding space' the ridiculous, abstract, non-sequitur science
>>> of choice, science du jour?
>>>
>>> It's still ridiculous science fiction. Give me a break.
>>>
>>
>> Well, first of all, you'd need a reasoning why information can go
>> any faster than the speed of light.
>>
>> It's not an un-usual idea that gravity's speed is infinite, with
>> the idea that three objects in a row can send information to a
>> third object in the middle, which can move, then that thusly,
>> the destination can immediately detect the movement, gravitationally,
>> effectively doubling light speed ("guide lode").
>>
>> Then, the space-time wheel, is after the idea that two systems
>> can't observe each other at light-speed, so they each rotate,
>> toward light speed, effectively halving light speed ("space-time
>> wheel"). 
>>
>>
>> It's well-known that that solar system, for example, has that
>> the effective force of gravity always points at the source
>> not the image, so the speed of gravity is greater than the
>> speed of light, otherwise gravity would point at the image
>> not the source, and the solar system would fly apart.
>>
>>
>> Then, for real space-contraction then light speed is a value
>> that can be derived as basically twice aether drift velocity.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Since setting up a mechanical system over many astronomical units
> or parsecs is non-trivial, mostly it would depend on planetary
> and solar axial alignments, about Moon-Earth, Earth-Sun, Sun-Polaris,
> and so on, about when the planets and stars align, then as with
> regards to the much, much wider surrounds of the galactic and
> super-galactic about that, the projections and these kinds of things.
> 
> 
> At least: it's conceptually simple notions of "guide lode" and
> "space-time wheel", and furthermore science as it is today
> doesn't make them simply farcical or "dis-proven".
> 
> 
> Since Einstein's SR is local, then also light-speed is local.
> 
> That "there are no closed finite time-like curves", and so
> no violation of causality or paradoxes of time, doesn't say
> much about "closed infinitesimal time-like curves", which
> basically reflect chance itself then for that clocks either
> slow or meet, about real space-contraction.
> 
> 
> "Astronomical units" and "parsecs" are both kinds of local, measures.
> This also is already in the theory about differences between
> "length" the metric and "distance" the norm, since usually enough
> people forget they're not the same thing.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Your mom's butt is what they use for bigger stuff.  LOL!  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896029

The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
>>
>> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
>>
>> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
>>
>> It's very simple..
>> you pop in, you pop out.
>>
>> or, you pop out, you pop in.
>>
>> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
>>
>> How did the universe get in here?
>>
>> It popped in!
>>
>> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
>>
>> Start with a simple definition:
>>
>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
>>
>>   in
>> /in/
>> preposition
>>
>>      expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
>>
>> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).
>>
>> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
>>
>> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
>>
>> Now, how do you pop out from in?
>>
>> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
>>
>> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
>>
>> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
>>
>> roof, roof!
> 
> 
> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
> 
>   "How did you get here?"
> 
> 
> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
> 
> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
> 
> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
> 

I doubt it. The math symbol for 'universe' is 'U'. Duh.

-- 
The future has begun
The waiting is over
We have gained time
For one blink of an eye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896030

phoenix wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
>>
>>   "How did you get here?"
>>
>>
>> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
>>
>> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
>>
>> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"
>>
> 
> I doubt it. The math symbol for 'universe' is 'U'. Duh.

It is one possible symbol.  The concept of a universe in mathematics is
(like all those concepts) independent of what symbol one uses for it.

It is also different from the concept of a universe in astrophysics.

So the two of you are just writing nonsense based on your half-wit
knowledge, i.e. ignorance.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#896031

On 6/1/2026 11:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> https://studyfinds.com/what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth-aerospace-engineer-did-math/
>>
>> what-would-it-take-for-aliens-to-reach-earth?
>>
>> Answer: by not using stupid math from people on earth.
>>
>> It's very simple..
>> you pop in, you pop out.
>>
>> or, you pop out, you pop in.
>>
>> Okay, you are a golden retriever...
>>
>> How did the universe get in here?
>>
>> It popped in!
>>
>> Okay, I'm talking to a dog.
>>
>> Start with a simple definition:
>>
>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
>>
>>   in
>> /in/
>> preposition
>>
>>      expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
>>
>> a preposition indicating location or position within limits (e.g., “in the house”).
>>
>> Now, How did the universe get 'in' here???
>>
>> 'In the beginning, ...' of course.
>>
>> Now, how do you pop out from in?
>>
>> Ask a dog, "What's on top of the house?"
>>
>> Dog sez: "roof, roof!"
>>
>> Now, ask an alien from outer space, "How did you get here?"
>>
>> roof, roof!
> 
> 
> Now, if you ask the alien from outer space...
> 
>   "How did you get here?"
> 
> 
> The alien would say..."I can give you the math."
> 
> The alien would then say..."What is math symbol for 'universe?"
> 
> The Math guy would say..."WHAT?"

ask Bob Lazar... ;^D

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web