Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #550411 > unrolled thread

Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
First post2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
Last post2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
Articles 20 on this page of 97 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:20 +0100
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
                                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
                                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
                                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
                                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
                                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
                                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
                                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
                                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
                                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
                                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
                                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →


#551027

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
Message-ID<5213102e7d795603ae437dcf79b2049c@dizum.com>
In reply to#550999
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n9652d$381$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:

> On 06/02/2016 6:39 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
>> <news:n95q3a$1k43$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
>> the wood chipper again:

>>> On 06/02/2016 2:01 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus wrote:

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

>>>> I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
>>>> 5.5 to 14 microns, most of which is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window"
>>>>
>>>> Kensi said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of
>>>> winter snow".

>> Let's watch a spankard backpedal...

>>> IOW, I said most of it

>> "it" being "a patch of winter snow"

> *facepalm*
> 
> If I've told you once I've told you a thousand times: *read* for 
> *comprehension*.

I did, you're just a backpedaling spankard.

I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
5.5 to 14 microns, most of which is outside the 11 micron atmospheric
window"

Kensi said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of
winter snow".

You were *wrong*. Now you backpedal faster, you pathetic piece of
moronic shit.

<snicker>

>>> That
>>> you seem to be disputing that (and then using selective quoting, which I
>>> corrected above, to "support" your k'lames) means that *you* have now
>>> just k'lamed that the blackbody radiation from winter snow comes out in
>>> a single narrow emission line at 11 microns,

>> It's a very narrow range, obviously bordered on the shorter
>> wavelengths by the temperature reached, and bordered on the longer
>> wavelengths by the melting point of snow,

> Proof that you don't understand how blackbody radiation works. No 
> surprise there, of course.

Unbelievable. The spankard LunkHead has it laid out for him in
mathematical format so even he could figure it out for himself, and
yet he still continues to demonstrate that clue eludes him. Kensi is
ranging into PauLumpy Dumpyshire stupid.

<snicker>

>> Awww, you're lying to try to cover up your lie that the Gaussian
>> Curvature of a perfect sphere is dependent upon its radius...
>> ... the erroneous data on Wikipedia that you obviously used  ...

> Once again, if you're so sure the wikipedia article is wrong, go correct 
> it yourself.
> 
> I dare you.

I don't need to. All I had to do was prove you *wrong*. Which I did,
which you backpedaled from. I proved you wrong a second time, which
you're further backpedaling from. Spankard.

Hey everybody! Kensi thinks the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
dependent upon its radius! The moron has twice defended his fuckup,
and thus proven that he can't even do simple geometry, even when he's
*given* the correct answer. Paul Derbyshire is similarly stupid, which
is why he's a lonely loser hunting mushrooms, and is most definitely
*not* an astrophysicist. He can't handle the intellectual rigors of
anything more than being the human equivalent of a truffle pig.

<snicker>

>> On top of that, you've further k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time
>> is predominantly positive Gaussian curvature with only minimal
>> negative Gaussian curvature, thereby proving you have no clue of the
>> effects magnetism has upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold,

> In standard general relativity, it has *no* effects (save to cause a 
> small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field).

You're wrong, again. The Riemann curvature tensor concept being the
central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the
modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being
described by the geodesic deviation equation proves you wrong, again.

Whereas gravity is a curvature of space-time due to mass, magnetism
causes a curvature of space-time geometrically described via the
Faraday tensor, which stands in for the Riemann Curvature tensor (for
gravity) when using the geodesic deviation equation to describe the
deflection of the Riemannian manifold due to magnetism. The primary
difference between gravity and magnetism being that magnetism can
cause a positive *or* negative Gaussian curvature.

In real life, as modeled via special relativity and the geodesic
deviation equation, you have no clue of the effects magnetism has upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and you've just admitted it.
You're a poseur. You're no astrophysicist or you would have been able
to actually correlate magnetic field strength to the stress imposed
upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold and thus its curvature, to
include the relativistic effects.

In fact, you're *so* wrong you've expressly stated "it has *no*
effects" under general relativity, then went on to compound your
errors by further stating it only causes "a small amount of positive
curvature due to the energy density in the field". So which is it,
LunkHead? "*no* effects", or "a small amount of positive curvature"...
because *both* are *wrong*. LOL

Lunkhead denies that there is magnetic attraction! Bwahahaaaa!

Lunkhead just proved he doesn't have a clue what effect magnets have!
He doesn't know how magnets work! Bwahahahaaaa!

Lunkhead further k'lames that planets ride *above* the tangential
plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the
planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature!
Bwahahaaaaa!

Lunkhead has k'lamed (and repeatedly reiterated, since I let the moron
run with his stupidity for a while before jerking his leash) that
gravity *repels*. Bwahahaaaaa!

Lunkhead has just described a universe in which planets could not
maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and
therefore a universe which could not exist! Bwahahaaaaa!

And the really funny part is that LunkHead is far too stupid to even
realize he's done any of the above.

Way to out yourself, ShroomTard. Moron.

<snicker>

> It does a lot more in the abandoned Kaluza-Klein theory, an attempt to 
> unify gravitation and electromagnetism back in the twenties (before they 
> even knew about either of the two nuclear forces).

What's that got to do with the fact that you've been proven *wrong*
about everything you've been blathering, and the more you blather, the
more wrong you prove yourself to be, LunkHead? LOL

It's little wonder you believe in that lie / scam of Anthropogenic
Global Warming, which has been proven via the NASA SABER study and
several peer-reviewed studies to be nothing more than a fairy tale
that only anti-science dimwits believe in, you're the anti-science
dimwit who doesn't understand how things work. You've proven it with
your own statements. LOL

You're just a confused slump-shouldered little kook with a brain that
can't even grasp reality... best your next sock is something along the
lines of a Jerry Sauk type... at least then you'd be operating at your
intellectual level.

<snicker>

>> There's a phrase that applies perfectly here: "Your saying it doesn't
>> make it so."
>> 
>> You're delusional, you're snipping out all the info that proves you're
>> delusional, you've been proven *wrong* on every single point you've
>> brought up, and now you're backpedaling with outright lies... and the
>> whole while you've demonstrated you can't even do simple geometry
>> problems without fucking them up, you've admitted you didn't even know
>> that the Riemann curvature tensor concept is the central mathematical
>> tool in the theory of general relativity, the modern theory of
>> gravity, and that the curvature of spacetime is described by the
>> geodesic deviation equation, and therefore you have no clue how
>> space-time is warped by mass, and therefore there's no way you're an
>> astrophysicist, you backpedaling moron.
>> 
>> On top of that, you've further k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time
>> is predominantly positive Gaussian curvature with only minimal
>> negative Gaussian curvature, thereby proving you have no clue of the
>> effects magnetism has upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold,
>> which means you have no clue about how space-time can be warped. And
>> given that you're a half-witted moron, I highly doubt you'll ever
>> figure that out, because you've demonstrated your fundamental
>> conceptual errors as pertains not only 4-D Minkowski space-time but of
>> magnetism, as well... and you can't even do basic geometry problems,
>> so your figuring out how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski
>> space-time manifold will be too high a hurdle for you by far.
>> 
>> SPNAK!
>> 
>> I win. You lose. Because stupid always loses, Stupid.
>> 
>> Do you really think you're fooling anyone, Lunkhead?
>> 
>> Spankard.
>> 
>> <snicker>

> Ohhh, the irony.

Says the moronic spankard who keeps blathering more and more *wrong*.
Bwahahahaaa! That's the biggest SPNAK! you've ever gotten, you fucking
spankard.

Now you backpedal harder, LunkHead, because not even the morons in AUK
believe your backpedaling bullshit.

I win. You lose. Because stupid always loses, Stupid.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551147

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
Message-ID<n98sbh$1nhg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#551027
Another SPNAK! on the kOok, this time from a university rather than 
Wikipedia.

https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html

Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared.

But I suppose I edited Harvey Mudd Collage's webpage to support my 
contention, or that Harvey Mudd College's math department don't know 
beans about math, or some such excuse for you to try to weasel out of 
taking your SPNAK!s like a person of reason, eh, ko0ky?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551184

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
Message-ID<676c242bcfe4e1e3b0ddc61252e043ab@dizum.com>
In reply to#551147
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n98sbh$1nhg$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

> Another SPNAK! on the kOok, this time from a university rather than 
> Wikipedia.

You're so bootfucked you're now trying to use the same web page I'd
used to prove you *wrong* as means of your pathetic backpedaling,
LunkHead. LOL

Backpedal faster, LunkHead. Maybe if you start foaming and fill all of
Usenet with meltdown screed, you'll be able to cover up that you outed
the fact that there's no way in hell you're an astrophysicist.

SPNAK!

> https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html

Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
========================================================
<http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianCurvature.html>
"For a sphere, the Gaussian curvature is K=1/a^2"

<https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html>
"Gaussian Curvature: K[u,v] = 1/a^2"

<http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
"Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.
========================================================

SPNAK!

> Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared.

Nowhere on that web page does it say that, you bootfucked spankard.
LOL

SPNAK!

> But I suppose I edited Harvey Mudd Collage's webpage to support my 
> contention, or that Harvey Mudd College's math department don't know 
> beans about math, or some such excuse for you to try to weasel out of 
> taking your SPNAK!s like a person of reason, eh, ko0ky?

No, you're just a lying backpedaling bootfucked kook who's had his
stupid ass drop-kicked across Usenet because you're too stupid to do
simple geometry problems. LOL

Spankard.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic
geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that planets
ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time
manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive
Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnets affect the 4-D
Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic
attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551185

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
Message-ID<n999q8$3ff$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#551184
On 08/02/2016 12:26 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>> https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html
>> Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared.
>
> Nowhere on that web page does it say that, you bootfucked spankard.
> LOL

You don't have to keep demonstrating your hopeless incompetence at 
reading comprehension. We're all thoroughly convinced.

*snicker*

I'll help the poor struggling koOk a little now, though -- this math is, 
after all, well beyond what a highschool dropout who now spends his days 
doing blue-collar labor on fixer-uppers (if, that is, you're not lying 
about your job) can be expected to cope with.

*snicker*

Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand, the Gaussian 
curvature, which is defined at each point of a smooth manifold, and the 
integral of that curvature over the manifold, on the other. The latter, 
for closed and bounded manifolds like a sphere surface or torus (donut 
surface), is 2*pi*chi(M) where chi(M) is the Euler characteristic, and 
thus is 4*pi for a sphere (regardless of curvature or size). But the 
former is 1/r^2 at every point on that sphere. In particular, the 
Gaussian curvature depends on r.

Now do you understand?

> No, you're just a l<SMACKAK00K!>

No, *you're* just a high school dropout. And a lOon.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551195

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
Message-ID<ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com>
In reply to#551185
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n999q8$3ff$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:

> On 08/02/2016 12:26 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

>>> https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html
>>> Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared.

Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
========================================================
<http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianCurvature.html>
"For a sphere, the Gaussian curvature is K=1/a^2"

<https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html>
"Gaussian Curvature: K[u,v] = 1/a^2"

<http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
"Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.
========================================================

SPNAK!

>> Nowhere on that web page does it say that, you bootfucked spankard.
>> LOL

> You don't have to keep demonstrating your hopeless incompetence at 
> reading comprehension. We're all thoroughly convinced.

Awwww, I've reduced LunkHead the Libtard to pathetic backpedaling and
lying. How's it feel to have lost so badly, LunkHead? I have to ask
because I've never lost. You've been spanked so hard your asscheeks
must be throbbing red by now.

I won, you lost. Because stupid always loses, Stupid.

<snicker>

> *snicker*
> 
> I'll help the poor struggling koOk a little now, though -- this math is, 
> after all, well beyond what a highschool dropout who now spends his days 
> doing blue-collar labor on fixer-uppers (if, that is, you're not lying 
> about your job) can be expected to cope with.
> 
> *snicker*

Now let's watch LunkHead the bootfucked libtarded moron backpedal, lie
and copy-n-paste bleat as he yet again demonstrates that he's too
stupid to do even simple geometry problems. LOL

> Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand, the Gaussian 
> curvature, which is defined at each point of a smooth manifold, and the 
> integral of that curvature over the manifold, on the other. The latter, 
> for closed and bounded manifolds like a sphere surface or torus (donut 
> surface), is 2*pi*chi(M) where chi(M) is the Euler characteristic, and 
> thus is 4*pi for a sphere (regardless of curvature or size).

Bwahahahaaa! Yet again LunkHead confuses 'constant curvature' and
'Gaussian curvature'. What a fucking lackwit *moron*. LOL!

> But the former is 1/r^2 at every point on that sphere.
> In particular, the Gaussian curvature depends on r.

Wrong. Just admit you're too stupid to understand the equations you're
copying and pasting from a web page, LunkHead. You're only making
yourself look more and more pathetic. LOL

<http://www.applet-magic.com/gaussbonet.htm>
"The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem in 3D space says that the integral of the
Gaussian curvature over a closed smooth surface is equal to 2*pi times
the Euler characteristic of the surface. For example, a sphere of
radius R has a constant curvature of 1/R^2 so the integral of
curvature over the surface of the sphere is the constant curvature of
1/R^2 times the area of the sphere of 4*pi*R^2 which is equal to
4*pi."

What's 2 * pi * 2 (Euler-Poincare number of a sphere), LunkHead? LOL
Do you see the radius anywhere in the end result of the Gauss-Bonnet
Theorem for a sphere, LunkHead? No? SPNAK! LOL

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%E2%80%93Bonnet_theorem>
"Descartes' theorem on total angular defect of a polyhedron is the
polyhedral analog: it states that the sum of the defect at all the
vertices of a polyhedron which is homeomorphic to the sphere is 4*pi."

Doesn't 2 * pi * 2 = 4 * pi, LunkHead? SPNAK! LOL

<http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
"Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.

"independent of the radius r". SPNAK! LOL

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
========================================================
<http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
"Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.
========================================================

What's that say, you backpedaling bootfucked spankard? "independent of
the radius r"... which means yet again you've been bootfucked by your
own stupidity because you don't understand the equations you're trying
to use.

SPNAK!

> Now do you understand?

It's obvious that you don't. It's obvious that you can't. You are,
after all, as retarded as Paul Derbyshire.

<snicker>

>> No, you're just a l<SMACKAK00K!>

> No, *you're* just a high school dropout. And a lOon.
> 
> *snicker*

Awwww, now I've reduced LunkHead the bootfucked libtard moron to
fanfic because he knows he's *wrong*.

I win, you lose. Because stupid always loses, Stupid.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic
geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that planets
ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time
manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive
Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnets affect the 4-D
Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic
attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551300

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
Message-ID<342eb30aba0dbc06663692a58ff2410c@dizum.com>
In reply to#551195
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
<news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> 
> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
> <news:n999q8$3ff$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
> wood chipper again:

>> On 08/02/2016 12:26 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus wrote:

> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
> ========================================================
> ========================================================
> > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  
> 
> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
> coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
> apparently.
> 
> And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
> on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
> 
> Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
> anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
> it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
> between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
> f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
> getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
> mouth!
> 
> Oh, here's Kensi:
> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
> 
> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
> I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
> 
> Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
> thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
> 
> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
> 
> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
> say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
> "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
> kinky. LOL
> 
> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> 
> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> > any good telescopes lately?
> 
> Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
> capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
> 
> <snicker>
> ========================================================
> ========================================================
> 
> I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
> time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
> work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
> which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
> lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
> because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
> assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
> jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
> dude.
> 
> <snicker>

>>>> https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html
>>>> Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared.

> Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
> ========================================================
> <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianCurvature.html>
> "For a sphere, the Gaussian curvature is K=1/a^2"
> 
> <https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html>
> "Gaussian Curvature: K[u,v] = 1/a^2"
> 
> <http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
> "Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
> 4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.
> ========================================================
> 
> SPNAK!

What's the matter, LunkHead, is that simple math kicking your
stoooopid ass? Again? LOL!

>>> Nowhere on that web page does it say that, you bootfucked spankard.
>>> LOL

>> You don't have to keep demonstrating your hopeless incompetence at 
>> reading comprehension. We're all thoroughly convinced.

> Awwww, I've reduced LunkHead the Libtard to pathetic backpedaling and
> lying. How's it feel to have lost so badly, LunkHead? I have to ask
> because I've never lost. You've been spanked so hard your asscheeks
> must be throbbing red by now.
> 
> I won, you lost. Because stupid always loses, Stupid.
> 
> <snicker>

>> *snicker*
>> 
>> I'll help the poor struggling koOk a little now, though -- this math is, 
>> after all, well beyond what a highschool dropout who now spends his days 
>> doing blue-collar labor on fixer-uppers (if, that is, you're not lying 
>> about your job) can be expected to cope with.
>> 
>> *snicker*

> Now let's watch LunkHead the bootfucked libtarded moron backpedal, lie
> and copy-n-paste bleat as he yet again demonstrates that he's too
> stupid to do even simple geometry problems. LOL

>> Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand, the Gaussian 
>> curvature, which is defined at each point of a smooth manifold, and the 
>> integral of that curvature over the manifold, on the other. The latter, 
>> for closed and bounded manifolds like a sphere surface or torus (donut 
>> surface), is 2*pi*chi(M) where chi(M) is the Euler characteristic, and 
>> thus is 4*pi for a sphere (regardless of curvature or size).

I just realize that LunkHead doesn't know what "integral" means. He
thinks an integral is a separate measure other than the Gaussian
curvature! Bwahahaaaaa! What a *moron*. He can't do simple geometry
problems, he's demonstrated repeatedly that he doesn't know how to
cancel identical terms in an equation, and now he's admitted he
doesn't even know what an integral is!

LunkHead wrote: "Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one
hand, the Gaussian curvature, which is defined at each point of a
smooth manifold, and the integral of that curvature over the manifold"

In mathematics, an integral assigns numbers to functions in a way that
can describe displacement, area, volume, and other concepts that arise
by combining infinitesimal data. So in effect, the integral of the
Gaussian curvature is merely the equation that describes that Gaussian
curvature, but LunkHead thinks it's separate, another measure of
curvature!

What a *moron*! He's SPNAK'd himself with his own stupidity yet again!

Bwahahahaaaa!

> Bwahahahaaa! Yet again LunkHead confuses 'constant curvature' and
> 'Gaussian curvature'. What a fucking lackwit *moron*. LOL!

>> But the former is 1/r^2 at every point on that sphere.
>> In particular, the Gaussian curvature depends on r.

> Wrong. Just admit you're too stupid to understand the equations you're
> copying and pasting from a web page, LunkHead. You're only making
> yourself look more and more pathetic. LOL
> 
> <http://www.applet-magic.com/gaussbonet.htm>
> "The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem in 3D space says that the integral of the
> Gaussian curvature over a closed smooth surface is equal to 2*pi times
> the Euler characteristic of the surface. For example, a sphere of
> radius R has a constant curvature of 1/R^2 so the integral of
> curvature over the surface of the sphere is the constant curvature of
> 1/R^2 times the area of the sphere of 4*pi*R^2 which is equal to
> 4*pi."
> 
> What's 2 * pi * 2 (Euler-Poincare number of a sphere), LunkHead? LOL
> Do you see the radius anywhere in the end result of the Gauss-Bonnet
> Theorem for a sphere, LunkHead? No? SPNAK! LOL
> 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%E2%80%93Bonnet_theorem>
> "Descartes' theorem on total angular defect of a polyhedron is the
> polyhedral analog: it states that the sum of the defect at all the
> vertices of a polyhedron which is homeomorphic to the sphere is 4*pi."
> 
> Doesn't 2 * pi * 2 = 4 * pi, LunkHead? SPNAK! LOL
> 
> <http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
> "Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
> 4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.
> 
> "independent of the radius r". SPNAK! LOL
> 
> Kensi the moron wrote:
> ================================
> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
> the curvature is 4*pi
> ================================
> 
> Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
> Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.
> 
> Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
> Therefore, r = 0.28209479176
> 
> Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
> of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
> units.
> 
> The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
> upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.
> 
> Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
> ========================================================
> <http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
> "Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
> 4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.
> ========================================================
> 
> What's that say, you backpedaling bootfucked spankard? "independent of
> the radius r"... which means yet again you've been bootfucked by your
> own stupidity because you don't understand the equations you're trying
> to use.
> 
> SPNAK!

>> Now do you understand?

> It's obvious that you don't. It's obvious that you can't. You are,
> after all, as retarded as Paul Derbyshire.
> 
> <snicker>

>>> No, you're just a l<SMACKAK00K!>

>> No, *you're* just a high school dropout. And a lOon.
>> 
>> *snicker*

> Awwww, now I've reduced LunkHead the bootfucked libtard moron to
> fanfic because he knows he's *wrong*.
> 
> I win, you lose. Because stupid always loses, Stupid.
> 
> <snicker>

Now let's watch LunkHead backpedal even faster... I'm betting he tries
to k'lame he was talking about the constant curvature in deriving the
Gaussian curvature all along... except:

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

So LunkHead can only k'lame that he's stated:
Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2
constant curvature = 1/r^2 * 4*pi*r^2 = 4*pi

<http://www.applet-magic.com/gaussbonet.htm>
================================
The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem in 3D space says that the integral of the
Gaussian curvature over a closed smooth surface is equal to 2*pi times
the Euler characteristic of the surface. For example, a sphere of
radius R has a constant curvature of 1/R^2 so the integral of
curvature over the surface of the sphere is the constant curvature of
1/R^2 times the area of the sphere of 4*pi*R^2 which is equal to 4*pi.
================================

So the constant curvature = 1/r^2, whereas the Gaussian curvature =
1/r^2 * 4*pi*r^2 = 4*pi, the exact *opposite* of what LunkHead has
k'lamed.

That means that *if* LunkHead tries to make that k'lame, he switched
the meanings of Gaussian curvature and constant curvature. So yet
again LunkHead finds himself 180 degrees out from reality.

That's the *only* reason the moronic lackwit would continue to k'lame
that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon radius,
which it most definitely is not:

Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
========================================================
<http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r.
========================================================

Bwahahahaaaa! What a moronic spankard. Ko0O0oki Kensi the LunkHeaded
LibTard k'lames he's an astrophysicist, but he can't even do simple
geometry problems!

SPNAK!

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic
geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551312

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
Message-ID<op.yci1whqstm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#551300
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
> <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>

kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it  
with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.

i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i  
asked him about my porch roof gables?

-- 

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.

"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551315

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.312280fa5520e9e598c5cc@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551312
In article <op.yci1whqstm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says...


> 
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >
> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
> > <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >>
> 
> kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it
> with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.
> 
> i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i
> asked him about my porch roof gables?

Right after he posts the pictures of his imaginary Lotus.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551517

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
Message-ID<139e5c392d32cc120101b09ba48b7da9@dizum.com>
In reply to#551315
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Chimpy D. PickleTickler (aka Checkmate the Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon),
in <news:MPG.312280fa5520e9e598c5cc@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> In article <op.yci1whqstm21m2@benson.localhost>,
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka
> Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
>>> <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:

>> kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it
>> with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.

"screedy diatribes" = truth you kooks can't refute.

IOW, you moronic kooks ran away because you don't want to face
reality. And reality is that you're kooks and morons.

<snicker>

>> i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i
>> asked him about my porch roof gables?

Says the moron who thinks a gable is food, and keeps gobbling it every 
time I dangle it on a hook.

<snicker>

Where's that fucking song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master, 
you pathetic procrastinating pile of putrid puke? It'd better be 
fucking stupendous, with all the time you've wasted on it.

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

> Right after he posts the pictures of his imaginary Lotus.

Already posted, Chimpy. One of the interior, and one of me doing a
burnout. Did... did Chimpy miss them? No, Chimpy didn't miss them,
he's probably archived them and pored over each and every single pixel
with a magnifying glass, then raped TinEye and Google Images for
similar images. So Chimpy's a lying queer gay fag.

<snicker>

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka 
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is 
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're 
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, 
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

-- 

FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."

In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>

In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>

Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>

Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>

Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet

Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"

Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"

MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."

Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."

MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"

Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."

MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."

Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"

MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."

MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."

MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."

MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."

MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"

MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."

MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."

MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."

MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL

MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL

MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL

Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================

What a FAG!

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!

<snicker>

/\                  Properly known as Bill
  \    /\      The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
   \  /  \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
    \/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.

Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.

databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.

Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551535

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
Message-ID<3iajbbpov7rfa0dm98ql9umjtj009i9mlt@4ax.com>
In reply to#551517
On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 06:17:50 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Right after he posts the pictures of his imaginary Lotus.
>
>Already posted, Chimpy. One of the interior, and one of me doing a
>burnout. Did... did Chimpy miss them? No, Chimpy didn't miss them,
>he's probably archived them and pored over each and every single pixel
>with a magnifying glass, then raped TinEye and Google Images for
>similar images. So Chimpy's a lying queer gay fag.



Never posted. Continue to tell us lies Faketard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551554

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.31235fe3939d0c8698c5f5@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551535
In article <3iajbbpov7rfa0dm98ql9umjtj009i9mlt@4ax.com>, 
skeet@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 06:17:50 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> >> Right after he posts the pictures of his imaginary Lotus.
> >
> >Already posted, Chimpy. One of the interior, and one of me doing a
> >burnout. Did... did Chimpy miss them? No, Chimpy didn't miss them,
> >he's probably archived them and pored over each and every single pixel
> >with a magnifying glass, then raped TinEye and Google Images for
> >similar images. So Chimpy's a lying queer gay fag.
> 
> 
> 
> Never posted. Continue to tell us lies Faketard.

"Oh... those.  I... I posted them a long time ago.  You musta missed 
them somehow.  I'd give you the MID's or repost them, but I, uh... I'm 
too busy Google dumpster-diving right now, so allah-allah and stuff."

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551563

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
Message-ID<n9cifl$15u2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#551312
On 08/02/2016 1:34 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 
Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 
Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
>> <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>
> kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it
> with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.
>
> i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i
> asked him about my porch roof gables?

Oh, probably around half-past never.

I think I've got him panting hard enough and now it's time to freeze him 
out until he starts *begging* for attention from his Usenet Lady and 
Mistress again. No doubt he'll k'lame I'm "running away" or some such 
BS, then whine, then start pining for me pathetically by randomly 
starting new threads full of copy-pasted climate change denial screeds.

Ko0ks are so predictable. *snicker*
-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551662

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
Message-ID<27d4b658eef0087e92b6c1a8da18f14a@dizum.com>
In reply to#551563
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:n9cifl$15u2$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> On 08/02/2016 1:34 PM, Robert Michael Wolfe
> the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider)
> of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:

Awww, look... one math-challenged moron rushing to the aid of another
math-challenged moron. LOL!

>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
>>> <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

>> kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it
>> with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.
>>
>> i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i
>> asked him about my porch roof gables?

Translation:
"FNVWe just kicked the living shit out of that math-challenged moron!
Must help! <puts on tardcape> Duh-Duh-Duuuhhhhhh! It's SUPER-MORON!"

<snicker>

> Oh, probably around half-past never.
> 
> I think I've got him panting hard enough and now it's time to freeze him 
> out until he starts *begging* for attention from his Usenet Lady and 
> Mistress again. No doubt he'll k'lame I'm "running away" or some such 
> BS, then whine, then start pining for me pathetically by randomly 
> starting new threads full of copy-pasted climate change denial screeds.
> 
> Ko0ks are so predictable. *snicker*

Translation:
"I've had my retarded, math deficient, mushroom picking, slump
shouldered, as retarded as that utter spanktard Paul Derbyshire,
moronic backpedaling ass drop-kicked across Usenet. I've been proven
wrong on everything I've blathered. Now I'll run away. I'm a spankard
like that."

Bwahahahaaaa! LunkHead is so stupid he can't even do simple geometry
problems, he doesn't know the difference between constant curvature
and Gaussian curvature, and he doesn't know what an integral is.

And this is the moron who socked up as a woman to get sympathy on
Usenet, and k'lamed he's an astrophysicist. He's too stupid to be an
astrophysicist. He's too stupid to be anything other than an
unemployable shroom-picking welfare mooch. And now he's running away.
Again.

SPNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNAAAAAAK!

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551688

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
Message-ID<n08kbblf6q37bvals46o50qk7d7m4pirv2@4ax.com>
In reply to#551662
On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 16:42:41 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>I've had my retarded, math deficient, mushroom picking, slump
>shouldered, as retarded as that utter spanktard Paul Derbyshire,
>moronic backpedaling ass drop-kicked across Usenet. I've been proven
>wrong on everything I've blathered.

His own words.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551669

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.3123ac34f87cb5ee98c5f6@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551563
In article <n9cifl$15u2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
says...


> 
> On 08/02/2016 1:34 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 
> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >>
> >> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
> >> <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >>>
> >
> > kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it
> > with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.
> >
> > i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i
> > asked him about my porch roof gables?
> 
> Oh, probably around half-past never.
> 
> I think I've got him panting hard enough and now it's time to freeze him 
> out until he starts *begging* for attention from his Usenet Lady and 
> Mistress again. No doubt he'll k'lame I'm "running away" or some such 
> BS, then whine, then start pining for me pathetically by randomly 
> starting new threads full of copy-pasted climate change denial screeds.
> 
> Ko0ks are so predictable. *snicker*

That's what he's doing in an effort to get my attention now... posting 
15-year-old Knoxy posts he found at the bottom of the Google dumpster. 
Like I give a fuck.  LOL!  He's played out, and not creative enough to 
revive his ko0k kareer.  LOL, etc...

Spin, Fakey, SPIN!

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551677

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
Message-ID<d6b6c4f346a119a803b2468cb36ac08a@dizum.com>
In reply to#551669
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate), in
<news:MPG.3123ac34f87cb5ee98c5f6@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> That's what he's doing in an effort to get my attention now... posting 
> 15-year-old Knoxy posts he found at the bottom of the Google dumpster. 
> Like I give a fuck.  LOL!  He's played out, and not creative enough to 
> revive his ko0k kareer.  LOL, etc...
> 
> Spin, Fakey, SPIN!

Translation:
"WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
That sweet Swedish poontang was supposed to be *mine*! She was stolen
away and banged so hard she got pregnant *twice* at the same time, by
a crazy guy who can't hold a job! How is that guy better than me?! All
I do is suck a dozen dicks a day. That's better than being crazy and
unemployable, right?! Now I'm going to die alone. Except for my
morbidly obese boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves.
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!"

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
Muahahaha, etc.

<snicker>

-- 

FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."

In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>

In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>

Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>

Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>

Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet

Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"

Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"

MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."

Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."

MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"

Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."

MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."

Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"

MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."

MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."

MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."

MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."

MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"

MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."

MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."

MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."

MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL

MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL

MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL

Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================

What a FAG!

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!

<snicker>

/\                  Properly known as Bill
  \    /\      The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
   \  /  \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
    \/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.

Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.

databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.

Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551690

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
Message-ID<348kbblrjff0t67mimkdqq0t8o116h0qlc@4ax.com>
In reply to#551677
On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 17:14:20 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>All
>I do is suck a dozen dicks a day.

His own words folks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551735

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.3123d6634367160098c600@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551690
In article <348kbblrjff0t67mimkdqq0t8o116h0qlc@4ax.com>, 
skeet@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 17:14:20 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> >All
> >I do is suck a dozen dicks a day.
> 
> His own words folks.

He must be trying to quit.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551739

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2)
Date2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
Message-ID<1mid96q.18pds4w128tyjrN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#551735
Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

> In article <348kbblrjff0t67mimkdqq0t8o116h0qlc@4ax.com>, 
> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> > On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 17:14:20 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > All I do is suck a dozen dicks a day.
> > 
> > His own words folks.
> 
> He must be trying to quit.
        
It's Ash Wednesday tomorrow; do you think 
he can do without for the whole of Lent?

-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, DoW #2    <snipeco.1@gmail.com>   (valid)

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#551752

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.3123dc7a75a9c23798c607@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551739
In article <1mid96q.18pds4w128tyjrN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
@gmail.com says...


> 
> Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> 
> > In article <348kbblrjff0t67mimkdqq0t8o116h0qlc@4ax.com>, 
> > skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> > 
> > > On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 17:14:20 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> > > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > All I do is suck a dozen dicks a day.
> > > 
> > > His own words folks.
> > 
> > He must be trying to quit.
>         
> It's Ash Wednesday tomorrow; do you think 
> he can do without for the whole of Lent?

He'll have to quit swallowing...

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web