Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #645008 > unrolled thread

Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2017-08-07 13:50 -0700
Last post2017-08-08 14:32 +1000
Articles 20 on this page of 35 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-07 13:50 -0700
    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-07 13:59 -0700
    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-07 16:11 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 22:31 -0700
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-08 14:35 -0700
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 19:24 -0400
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 16:31 -0700
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 17:19 -0700
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-08 21:50 -0400
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 00:34 -0700
                  Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 00:56 -0700
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 00:11 -0700
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-09 11:36 -0700
    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-07 18:27 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-07 20:06 -0700
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-08 00:27 -0400
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.com> - 2017-08-08 10:21 -0500
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-08 12:02 -0700
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-08 10:42 -0500
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-09-09 21:15 +0200
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-09 15:16 -0700
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-09 15:16 -0700
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-09 22:44 -0700
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-10 09:57 -0700
                  Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-09-10 15:17 -0700
                    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-09-10 15:38 -0700
                  Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-09-10 16:59 -0700
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 12:20 -0700
      Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 00:22 -0700
        Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 01:01 -0700
          Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-08 14:36 -0700
            Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-09 23:43 -0700
              Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-10 10:56 -0700
                Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-10 11:47 -0700
    Re: Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-08 14:32 +1000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#645008 — Albert Einsetein was a Scumbag

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-07 13:50 -0700
SubjectAlbert Einsetein was a Scumbag
Message-ID<5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com>
I'm sure most of yous agree.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#645009

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2017-08-07 13:59 -0700
Message-ID<34e7bf4d-74f8-4604-896a-c0d17ef9aaa0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#645008
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 1:50:21 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> I'm sure most of yous agree.


Not!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645040

FromHägar <hsahm@yahoo.com>
Date2017-08-07 16:11 -0700
Message-ID<qJidnTR0WPkQbhXEnZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#645008
"The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com... 

I'm sure most of yous agree.


*** Let's just say that I Googled both:

Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.

Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645103

FromArindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date2017-08-07 22:31 -0700
Message-ID<204dae23-7056-4e46-997c-b0f2ce880323@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#645040
On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com... 
> 
> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> 
> 
> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> 
> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> 
> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1

Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.

Popularity is no indication of genius.

Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.

One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.

Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645186

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2017-08-08 14:35 -0700
Message-ID<f917492a-a87d-4703-a310-c6de07028709@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#645103
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 10:31:37 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> > "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com... 
> > 
> > I'm sure most of yous agree.
> > 
> > 
> > *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> > 
> > Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> > The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> > 
> > Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> 
> Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> 
> Popularity is no indication of genius.
> 
> Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> 
> One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> 
> Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

Must help if those examiners are your relatives!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645210

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-08-08 19:24 -0400
Message-ID<598a4814$0$61097$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#645103
On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
>> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
>>
>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
>>
>>
>> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
>>
>> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
>> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
>>
>> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> 
> Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> 
> Popularity is no indication of genius.
> 
> Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> 
> One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> 
> Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
> 
Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where 
all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No 
supervisors needed!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645214

FromArindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date2017-08-08 16:31 -0700
Message-ID<1bde78e6-c5de-47c5-850c-10f9bfabb541@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#645210
On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> >> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
> >>
> >> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> >>
> >>
> >> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> >>
> >> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> >> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> >>
> >> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> > 
> > Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> > 
> > Popularity is no indication of genius.
> > 
> > Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> > 
> > One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> > 
> > Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> > 
> Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where 
> all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No 
> supervisors needed!

Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
mathematics, elocution, health...
Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!

Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
Benj is the most piteous.
Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
Containing all that is shittious.

Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and 
with 
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645224

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-08 17:19 -0700
Message-ID<598A54F4.5149@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#645214
Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> > On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> > >> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
> > >>
> > >> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> > >>
> > >> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> > >> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> > >>
> > >> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> > >
> > > Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> > >
> > > Popularity is no indication of genius.
> > >
> > > Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> > >
> > > One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> > >
> > > Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> > >
> > Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where
> > all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No
> > supervisors needed!
> 
> Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
> Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
> mathematics, elocution, health...
> Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!
> 
> Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
> Benj is the most piteous.
> Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
> Containing all that is shittious.
> 
> Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and
> with
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee



What new word are you talking about..."firstworld"?



How about 7/11?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645227

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-08-08 21:50 -0400
Message-ID<598a6a81$0$29153$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#645224
On 8/8/2017 8:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
>>> On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
>>>>> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
>>>>>
>>>>> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
>>>>> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
>>>>
>>>> Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
>>>>
>>>> Popularity is no indication of genius.
>>>>
>>>> Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
>>>>
>>>> One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
>>>>
>>>> Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>>
>>> Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where
>>> all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No
>>> supervisors needed!
>>
>> Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
>> Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
>> mathematics, elocution, health...
>> Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!
>>
>> Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
>> Benj is the most piteous.
>> Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
>> Containing all that is shittious.
>>
>> Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and
>> with
>> Cheers,
>> Arindam Banerjee
> 
> 
> 
> What new word are you talking about..."firstworld"?

Nobody knows what that insane nutjob is talking about. His purpose here 
is to disrupt all science discussion and shut this place down. He is 
obviously so ignorant and out of reality that even I won't support his 
theories and they sound even worse than Bert's "Nobel" efforts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645267

FromArindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date2017-08-09 00:34 -0700
Message-ID<0b18f84f-28bf-4e60-8120-e0b50af1b4dd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#645227
On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 11:51:01 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> On 8/8/2017 8:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> >>> On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> >>>>> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> >>>>> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> >>>>
> >>>> Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> >>>>
> >>>> Popularity is no indication of genius.
> >>>>
> >>>> Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> >>>>
> >>>> One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> >>>>
> >>>> Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Arindam Banerjee
> >>>>
> >>> Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where
> >>> all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No
> >>> supervisors needed!
> >>
> >> Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
> >> Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
> >> mathematics, elocution, health...
> >> Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!
> >>
> >> Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
> >> Benj is the most piteous.
> >> Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
> >> Containing all that is shittious.
> >>
> >> Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and
> >> with
> >> Cheers,
> >> Arindam Banerjee
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > What new word are you talking about..."firstworld"?
> 
> Nobody knows what that insane nutjob is talking about. 

Oy benj, you should know what firstworld means. You are an arrogant surly racist
creature who takes pride in belonging to a group which has far higher per 
capita income than those in the developing thirdworld countries. Not that such
an existence has made you anything remotely wholesome.

> His purpose here 
> is to disrupt all science discussion and shut this place down.

My purpose is to replace bad physics with good, sane physics with the use of 
my new ideas that have experimental validity. If that shuts down the mad bad
lot then what could be better. A saner world will become a far better world.

> He is 
> obviously so ignorant and out of reality that even I won't support his 
> theories and they sound even worse than Bert's "Nobel" efforts.

I need to give the world the opportunity to know my theories and how I 
validate them.
I believe that can be done before the powers that be change humans into robots 
or slaves.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645269

FromArindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date2017-08-09 00:56 -0700
Message-ID<27d3a450-237d-4555-ad15-ea3dcbc38b6e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#645267
On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 5:34:21 PM UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 11:51:01 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> > On 8/8/2017 8:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> > >>> On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > >>>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> > >>>>> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> > >>>>> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Popularity is no indication of genius.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Arindam Banerjee
> > >>>>
> > >>> Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where
> > >>> all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No
> > >>> supervisors needed!
> > >>
> > >> Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
> > >> Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
> > >> mathematics, elocution, health...
> > >> Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!
> > >>
> > >> Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
> > >> Benj is the most piteous.
> > >> Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
> > >> Containing all that is shittious.
> > >>
> > >> Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and
> > >> with
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Arindam Banerjee
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > What new word are you talking about..."firstworld"?
> > 
> > Nobody knows what that insane nutjob is talking about. 
> 
> Oy benj, you should know what firstworld means. You are an arrogant surly racist
> creature who takes pride in belonging to a group which has far higher per 
> capita income than those in the developing thirdworld countries. Not that such
> an existence has made you anything remotely wholesome.
> 
> > His purpose here 
> > is to disrupt all science discussion and shut this place down.
> 
> My purpose is to replace bad physics with good, sane physics with the use of 
> my new ideas that have experimental validity. If that shuts down the mad bad
> lot then what could be better. A saner world will become a far better world.
> 
> > He is 
> > obviously so ignorant and out of reality that even I won't support his 
> > theories and they sound even worse than Bert's "Nobel" efforts.
> 
> I need to give the world the opportunity to know my theories and how I 
> validate them.
> I believe that can be done before the powers that be change humans into robots 
> or slaves.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

The real problem was, that in the absence of the discovery of my equation
e=0.5mVVN(N-k) they went off into bizarre tangents with absurd theories like
relativity.

The phenomenon of radioactivity could not be explained with the law of 
conservation of energy.

Nor could the energy from the Sun.

Thus e=mcc was a convenient way to explain the energies that formed from the 
internal forces.

Aether theory was also discarded. Had it been around, it could have explained
the photoelectric effect as well as I have done recently in this newsgroup.

Finally, the atom bomb put the seal of approval upon the once widely and justly
derided formula of e=mcc.

Sad.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645265

FromArindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date2017-08-09 00:11 -0700
Message-ID<4110224c-4d1e-4fab-9a77-05b67ef8d6bf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#645224
On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 10:18:42 AM UTC+10, The Starmaker wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > 
> > On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> > > On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> > > >> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> > > >>
> > > >> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> > > >> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> > > >>
> > > >> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> > > >
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> > > >
> > > > Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> > > >
> > > > Popularity is no indication of genius.
> > > >
> > > > Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> > > >
> > > > One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> > > >
> > > > Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > >
> > > Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where
> > > all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No
> > > supervisors needed!
> > 
> > Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
> > Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
> > mathematics, elocution, health...
> > Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!
> > 
> > Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
> > Benj is the most piteous.
> > Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
> > Containing all that is shittious.
> > 
> > Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and
> > with
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> 
> 
> 
> What new word are you talking about..."firstworld"?
> 
It is not a new word. It is an economic term for developed countries with
high per capita income.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645309

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-09 11:36 -0700
Message-ID<598B5643.11A2@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#645265
Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 10:18:42 AM UTC+10, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:24:07 AM UTC+10, benj wrote:
> > > > On 8/8/2017 1:31 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:11:17 AM UTC+10, Hägar wrote:
> > > > >> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5988D299.48CE@ix.netcom.com...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> *** Let's just say that I Googled both:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Albert Einstein:  58,000,000 hits
> > > > >> The Starmaker:  775,000 hits.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Seems clear who's the genius and who's the ass-a-hole ...
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOZuxwVk7TU&list=PLlG4bSkqU7SVWmoB0hDi-ZAn7EVKO6mrr&index=1
> > > > >
> > > > > Britney Spears: 274,000,000 views.
> > > > >
> > > > > Popularity is no indication of genius.
> > > > >
> > > > > Only 4 people are required to award a PhD.
> > > > >
> > > > > One supervisor and up to 3 examiners.
> > > > >
> > > > > Most successful PhD theses are read by just 3-4 people.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Arindam Banerjee
> > > > >
> > > > Which is why Banjo never earned anything but a third world degree where
> > > > all that was needed was a little baksheesh to get that paper. No
> > > > supervisors needed!
> > >
> > > Third world education is superior by far than firstworld education.
> > > Far better languages, literatures, music, moral science, religion, manners,
> > > mathematics, elocution, health...
> > > Poor benj, just look at him, the miserable creep!
> > >
> > > Of all the pathetic assholes that aether did support
> > > Benj is the most piteous.
> > > Of arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance he holds the fort
> > > Containing all that is shittious.
> > >
> > > Hmm, creating an appropriate new word for the matter in benj's skull, and
> > > with
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
> >
> >
> >
> > What new word are you talking about..."firstworld"?
> >
> It is not a new word. It is an economic term for developed countries with
> high per capita income.



wat is fifthworld countries, is that like a Defcon 5 ????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645064

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-08-07 18:27 -0700
Message-ID<59891385.5E7@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#645008
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I'm sure most of yous agree.



Where should I start?


How about here:

https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645086

FromHägar <hsahm@yahoo.com>
Date2017-08-07 20:06 -0700
Message-ID<jPCdnfIthYggtxTEnZ2dnUU7-bvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#645064
"The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:59891385.5E7@ix.netcom.com... 

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I'm sure most of yous agree.


Where should I start?


How about here:

https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein


*** So I Googled both for Nobel Prizes awarded:

Einstein - 1, in 1922
The Starmaker - 0 (which, compared to Einstein, makes you a dumbass)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645098

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2017-08-08 00:27 -0400
Message-ID<ombebj$f9d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#645086

Hägar wrote:
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:59891385.5E7@ix.netcom.com...
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
>
>
> Where should I start?
>
>
> How about here:
>
> https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein
>
>
> *** So I Googled both for Nobel Prizes awarded:
>
> Einstein - 1, in 1922
> The Starmaker - 0 (which, compared to Einstein, makes you a dumbass)









Uhhhh.....are you sure you want to use "nobels" as a validiation ??
...Since Obama got one, they really lost a lot credibility.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645143

From"Jay E. Morris" <morrisj@epsilon3.com>
Date2017-08-08 10:21 -0500
Message-ID<omckmi$3a6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#645098
On 8/7/2017 11:27 PM, Bast wrote:
> Hägar wrote:
>> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:59891385.5E7@ix.netcom.com...
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
>>
>>
>> Where should I start?
>>
>>
>> How about here:
>>
>> https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein
>>
>>
>> *** So I Googled both for Nobel Prizes awarded:
>>
>> Einstein - 1, in 1922
>> The Starmaker - 0 (which, compared to Einstein, makes you a dumbass)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Uhhhh.....are you sure you want to use "nobels" as a validiation ??
> ...Since Obama got one, they really lost a lot credibility.
> 
> 
Well, that was the peace prize.  Hopefully the others are still given on 
merit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645162

FromHägar <hsahm@yahoo.com>
Date2017-08-08 12:02 -0700
Message-ID<P_qdnc29a7splxfEnZ2dnUU7-YXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#645143
"Jay E. Morris"  wrote in message news:omckmi$3a6$1@dont-email.me...

On 8/7/2017 11:27 PM, Bast wrote:
> Hägar wrote:
>> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:59891385.5E7@ix.netcom.com...
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
>>
>>
>> Where should I start?
>>
>>
>> How about here:
>>
>> https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein
>>
>>
>> *** So I Googled both for Nobel Prizes awarded:
>>
>> Einstein - 1, in 1922
>> The Starmaker - 0 (which, compared to Einstein, makes you a dumbass)
>
>
> Uhhhh.....are you sure you want to use "nobels" as a validiation ??
> ...Since Obama got one, they really lost a lot credibility.
>
>
Well, that was the peace prize.  Hopefully the others are still given on
merit.


*** Like the one Arafat got for his "peace" efforts ????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645144

FromSerg io <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2017-08-08 10:42 -0500
Message-ID<omcm4i$r7t$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#645086
On 8/7/2017 10:06 PM, Hägar wrote:
> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:59891385.5E7@ix.netcom.com...
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure most of yous agree.
> 
> 
> Where should I start?
> 
> 
> How about here:
> 
> https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein
> 
> 
> *** So I Googled both for Nobel Prizes awarded:
> 
> Einstein - 1, in 1922
> The Starmaker - 0 (which, compared to Einstein, makes you a dumbass)


thanks for the fbi link!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#649218

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2017-09-09 21:15 +0200
Message-ID<f1istqF4lo2U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#645144
Am 08.08.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Serg io:

>> *** So I Googled both for Nobel Prizes awarded:
>>
>> Einstein - 1, in 1922
>> The Starmaker - 0 (which, compared to Einstein, makes you a dumbass)
>
>
> thanks for the fbi link!
>

Here is a nice photo of Einstein, together with his 'wife':

https://i0.wp.com/www.kickassfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/CH.jpg?resize=1024%2C764


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web