Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #637658 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-25 10:25 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-07-07 19:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 116 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
"Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 10:25 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-25 15:46 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 22:49 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:20 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:24 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 05:46 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 06:13 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 16:19 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 19:05 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:00 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:17 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 00:33 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-27 23:12 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 20:49 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-29 00:34 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-28 22:06 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-28 22:53 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 14:10 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-03 13:26 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 17:09 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 17:53 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 16:15 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 20:37 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 17:41 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 18:06 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 21:41 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:26 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:32 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:49 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-28 17:37 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 17:50 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-28 17:35 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 16:13 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 20:40 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 19:09 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 10:02 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-29 10:24 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 17:01 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 05:07 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 05:11 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 06:01 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 14:21 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 16:42 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 14:30 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 18:04 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-30 18:33 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 01:43 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:39 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 11:55 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 17:04 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 21:16 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 06:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-03 15:23 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 17:50 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-04 17:16 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 19:52 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-05 19:39 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 08:24 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-06 17:12 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:10 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-06 21:53 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 21:58 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-02 12:55 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 11:15 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 11:21 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 18:33 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 01:35 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 04:46 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 04:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Gibutsi Fumihazu <uft@wwhm.cu> - 2017-07-01 12:06 +0000
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 08:30 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:45 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 16:34 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 05:09 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" "Herp Derpington" <herp@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-01 07:06 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 08:21 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:43 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 11:27 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 06:38 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 12:28 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 16:33 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 13:54 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 21:06 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 18:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-03 14:04 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 18:13 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:40 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 09:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-28 22:25 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 20:39 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-28 23:37 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 23:56 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:46 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:22 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-29 14:16 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 05:41 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:43 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 15:14 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-26 18:15 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:19 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-26 18:14 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 16:58 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 19:06 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:01 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:23 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-27 07:46 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 17:14 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 15:57 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 20:36 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-06-26 16:31 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:34 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-27 10:04 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 14:23 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-07 19:20 -0700
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-25 10:25 -0700 |
| Subject | "Einstein's Philosophy" |
| Message-ID | <594FF1F9.6F99@ix.netcom.com> |
"Einstein's Philosophy" One thing one does not see discuss anywhere is.. What is "Einstein's Philosophy"? What is his philosophy? I mean, just plain "Einstein's Philosophy"..without attaching any other branches to it. What is "Einstein's Philosophy"? Okay...maybe too hard a question. How about, What is Relativity? Is it the name of a planet? Is it an object? A wave? A small particle? A force? What is it? It's just...Philosophy. Relativity is just....Behaviorism. Behaviorism A scientific approach that limits the study of psychology to measurable or observable behavior. Behaviorist perspective The psychological perspective primarily concerned with observable behavior that can be objectively recorded and with the relationships of observable behavior to environmental stimuli. https://www.google.com/#q=behavior+definition+psychology Nothing to do with...physics. You need to change the name of that newsgroup to: sci.philosophy.relativity 'When you sit with a pretty girl for two hours you think it's only a minute, but when you sit on a hot stove for a minute you think it’s two hours. That's relativity."
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-25 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-57DEF1.15463825062017@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #637658 |
In article <594FF1F9.6F99@ix.netcom.com>, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > "Einstein's Philosophy" Fuck as many women as he could? -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ Free the Amos Yee one. This post / \ Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha. insults Islam. Mohammed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 22:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5951F201.7DE0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #637705 |
Siri Cruise wrote: > > In article <594FF1F9.6F99@ix.netcom.com>, > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > "Einstein's Philosophy" > > Fuck as many women as he could? > > -- > :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @ > 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ > Free the Amos Yee one. This post / \ > Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha. insults Islam. Mohammed Can you name all the womens names?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-25 19:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <69b35d8a-0078-4633-8012-1aab4b8967dc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #637658 |
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:25:27 AM UTC+10, The Starmaker wrote: > "Einstein's Philosophy" > > One thing one does not see discuss anywhere is.. > > What is "Einstein's Philosophy"? > > What is his philosophy? > > I mean, just plain "Einstein's Philosophy"..without attaching any other > branches to it. > > > What is "Einstein's Philosophy"? Einstein did not have a philosophy as such, but the results of his bungling led to many sinister approaches, devastating for humanity: How to corrupt physics and thus make humans mad and also stupid, so they will be requiring the support of the parasites_allsorts and pay them well. How to use mathematics to corrupt physics, by making wrong ideas look right and give them traction. How to waste public money on useless and evil things like nukes. How to give twisted explanations to simple natural phenomena like the Doppler Effect. How to avoid simple questions as to the origin of the Sun's and Earth's magnetic field. How to make conjecture and imagination far more powerful than experiment and their correct analysis. How to twist the result of an experiment to "prove" a wrong assumption, that the speed of light is independent of the speed of the emitter. How to keep humanity on the planet Earth, by denying the scope for travel to the stars as that would take faster than light ships. How to keep us all miserable and controlled as a consequence. How to cut down upon genuine scientific advances by rejecting those advances contrary to the e=mcc dogma. How to turn science into a religion. It is not Einstein that is the main problem, though; it is the Einsteinians, his followers that milk the population for research funding. > > > Okay...maybe too hard a question. No, no. See above. The consequences are so vast and widespread and universal, it is like living under an ocean of piss when one is an Einsteinian. Piss pressure acts from all sides. Such is the power of the media, telling Einsteinian lies 7*24 from all channels, and those echoed everywhere. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > > How about, What is Relativity? Is it the name of a planet? > > Is it an object? A wave? A small particle? A force? What is it? > > > It's just...Philosophy. > > Relativity is just....Behaviorism. > > > > Behaviorism A scientific approach that limits the study of psychology to > measurable or observable behavior. > Behaviorist perspective The psychological perspective primarily > concerned with observable behavior that > can be objectively recorded and with the relationships of observable > behavior to environmental stimuli. > > https://www.google.com/#q=behavior+definition+psychology > > > Nothing to do with...physics. > > > You need to change the name of that newsgroup to: > sci.philosophy.relativity > > > > > 'When you sit with a pretty girl for two hours you think it's only a > minute, but > when you sit on a hot stove for a minute you think it’s two hours. > That's relativity."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 07:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <oiq5ij$3at$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #637725 |
Dne 26/06/2017 v 04:20 Arindam Banerjee napsal(a): > > It is not Einstein that is the main problem, though; it is the Einsteinians, > his followers that milk the population for research funding. >> The problems are those spitting on things they do not understand to make the things to look wrong, crazy and irrelevant, while making themselves to look clever. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 05:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <084f858e-7567-4a00-a319-dd8b168c76c6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #637742 |
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:24:06 PM UTC+10, Poutnik Fornntp wrote: > Dne 26/06/2017 v 04:20 Arindam Banerjee napsal(a): > > > > It is not Einstein that is the main problem, though; it is the Einsteinians, > > his followers that milk the population for research funding. > >> > The problems are those > spitting on things they do not understand > to make the things to look wrong, crazy and irrelevant, > while making themselves to look clever. How correct, you seem to have understood the ways of the Einsteinians - all their lies are for milking the public for money for their pseudo/anti science. The genuine scientist does not depend upon milking the public for money to be wasted upon nonsensical conjectures like e=mcc He uses his wits, his time and his money, and braves all the horrors the liars and frauds can throw at him, in his pursuit of scientific truth. And then he publishes his results for the world to see, in the most convincing manner possible, as my video films to be found from the following links: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg IFE - 1 Ground Experiments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s IFE - 2 Experimental setups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc IFE - 6 Spaceship Design https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY IFE - 8 New Physics Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > -- > Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) > > A wise man guards words he says, > as they say about him more, > than he says about the subject.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 06:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b16f48eb-8229-42eb-b0c9-da12b8785fdf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #637762 |
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 8:46:35 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:24:06 PM UTC+10, Poutnik Fornntp wrote: > > Dne 26/06/2017 v 04:20 Arindam Banerjee napsal(a): > > > > > > It is not Einstein that is the main problem, though; it is the Einsteinians, > > > his followers that milk the population for research funding. > > >> > > The problems are those > > spitting on things they do not understand > > to make the things to look wrong, crazy and irrelevant, > > while making themselves to look clever. > > How correct, you seem to have understood the ways of the Einsteinians - all > their lies are for milking the public for money for their pseudo/anti science. > [] > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > > > > -- > > Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) > > > > A wise man guards words he says, > > as they say about him more, > > than he says about the subject. Sadly, Arindam, you fail to see that Poutnik was talking about you and the others on this group that feel the need to condemn what they do not understand. Have a nice day. ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 16:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c064874e-3ee5-4866-b450-0199ac8714e4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #637763 |
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 11:13:24 PM UTC+10, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 8:46:35 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 3:24:06 PM UTC+10, Poutnik Fornntp wrote: > > > Dne 26/06/2017 v 04:20 Arindam Banerjee napsal(a): > > > > > > > > It is not Einstein that is the main problem, though; it is the Einsteinians, > > > > his followers that milk the population for research funding. > > > >> > > > The problems are those > > > spitting on things they do not understand > > > to make the things to look wrong, crazy and irrelevant, > > > while making themselves to look clever. > > > > How correct, you seem to have understood the ways of the Einsteinians - all > > their lies are for milking the public for money for their pseudo/anti science. > > > [] > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > > > > > -- > > > Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) > > > > > > A wise man guards words he says, > > > as they say about him more, > > > than he says about the subject. > > Sadly, Arindam, you fail to see that Poutnik was talking > about you and the others on this group that feel the need > to condemn what they do not understand. > > Have a nice day. > ed Indeed? Truly I don't understand why the public should waste its money and resources upon unprofitable pursuits that suit the interests of the Einsteinian liars and thieves, with their worse-than-voodoo mumbo-jumbo based upon false assumptions and abuse of maths. They are scared because they think they know that nukes work, and they suppose that it works because of the e=mcc stuff, which is absolutely wrong of course. Sooner they realise that they have been conned, the better for all. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee e=0.5mVVN(N-k) c(V)=c+V and then the whole universe becomes straight, not distorted, and also infinite with infinite possibilities and potentials.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 19:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ois7h6$10ji$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #637839 |
On 6/26/17 6:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > Indeed? Truly I don't understand why the public should waste its money > and resources upon unprofitable pursuits that suit the interests of the > Einsteinian liars and thieves, with their worse-than-voodoo mumbo-jumbo > based upon false assumptions and abuse of maths. They are scared because > they think they know that nukes work, and they suppose that it works > because of the e=mcc stuff, which is absolutely wrong of course. > > Sooner they realise that they have been conned, the better for all. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > e=0.5mVVN(N-k) > c(V)=c+V > and then the whole universe becomes straight, not distorted, and also infinite > with infinite possibilities and potentials. I have to admit, I'm not certain what the source of your discomfort is. It may be that you want technology to be able to serve whatever goals mankind sets, and that no natural laws should be allowed to stand in the way. That is, if conservation of momentum prevents the salvation of mankind, in your eyes, then the originator of the conservation of momentum is an evil man. It may be that you find relativity to be incomprehensible, and anything incomprehensible you consider to be evil, a way of suppressing the common man. It may be that you think that all modern technological marvels like quantum tunneling and nuclear power plants are explainable by ordinary Newtonian ideas, though you're not quite sure how. It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 18:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dda274ea-62d1-433b-b32b-4c4417dbcacd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #637855 |
On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:06:03 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 6/26/17 6:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > Indeed? Truly I don't understand why the public should waste its money > > and resources upon unprofitable pursuits that suit the interests of the > > Einsteinian liars and thieves, with their worse-than-voodoo mumbo-jumbo > > based upon false assumptions and abuse of maths. They are scared because > > they think they know that nukes work, and they suppose that it works > > because of the e=mcc stuff, which is absolutely wrong of course. > > > > Sooner they realise that they have been conned, the better for all. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > e=0.5mVVN(N-k) > > c(V)=c+V > > and then the whole universe becomes straight, not distorted, and also infinite > > with infinite possibilities and potentials. > > I have to admit, I'm not certain what the source of your discomfort is. I thought I had made myself clear. > > It may be that you want technology to be able to serve whatever goals > mankind sets, and that no natural laws should be allowed to stand in the > way. That is, if conservation of momentum prevents the salvation of > mankind, in your eyes, then the originator of the conservation of > momentum is an evil man. No. That is not my point. The originator of the law of conservation of momentum was a very good man. He did his work with mechanical systems. The law worked very well indeed with mechanical systems. Of that there is no doubt. My point is that electrical systems do not necessarily follow the law of conservation of momentum. To that end I have performed some original experiments and I believe that in a genuinely scientific environment these experiments have to be carefully analysed and repeated. As I have often shown, they are to be found in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg IFE - 1 Ground Experiments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s IFE - 2 Experimental setups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc IFE - 6 Spaceship Design https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY IFE - 8 New Physics My source of discomfort lies in my getting ignored. That causes discomfort. Thus the evil lies in ignoring my work. And thus continuing with old ideas which have their own space, but should not be used to block new findings. > > It may be that you find relativity to be incomprehensible, and anything > incomprehensible you consider to be evil, a way of suppressing the > common man. No, relativity is not incomprehensible to me and it should not be incomprehensible to anyone. We should all know that it is based upon a bungle in the analysis of the MMI experiment which I pointed out in 2005. Relativity is simply wrong. To pass of something wrong as right is evil. It is an evil to which every person on Earth except a few like myself takes part. Evil does not do good, so it causes discomfort. In this case it lets frauds run the roost and they will employ fellow frauds, so the whole system is corrupt to the core. Knowing this, it is futile to publish in the journals, as they will reject on dogmatic grounds. Still, video is there, youtube is there, you are there and I am here, so I published my findings on youtube in a manner that I believe should convince honest and intelligent minds. And that is a cause for discomfort. > > It may be that you think that all modern technological marvels like > quantum tunneling and nuclear power plants are explainable by ordinary > Newtonian ideas, though you're not quite sure how. Nuclear power plants can be explained very well by my equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k). As are atom bombs. They are based upon extending Newtonian ideas, with my addition that internal force existence creates and destroys energy. This formula explains the workings of the universe very elegantly, and my new ideas in physics are explained in IFE-8. So dom't say "I am not quite sure how". My original ideas support Newton fully - they extend Newtonian ideas into the field of electrodynamics. > It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. Calling one an anti-Semite (and thus an honorary Nazi) is an old trick and a give-away. It has been applied to me often enough in the past. The last resort, what, after failing miserably to find the slightest fault in my works, let alone my character. Even if there are no brave and intelligent people to take up my science today, I do my work in the expectation that this situation cannot last for ever. Because true science is for the ages. It will always have appeal to those seeking truth. They will not be influenced by your smear tactics. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-26 23:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5951F85C.39A2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #637865 |
Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:06:03 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 6/26/17 6:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > Indeed? Truly I don't understand why the public should waste its money > > > and resources upon unprofitable pursuits that suit the interests of the > > > Einsteinian liars and thieves, with their worse-than-voodoo mumbo-jumbo > > > based upon false assumptions and abuse of maths. They are scared because > > > they think they know that nukes work, and they suppose that it works > > > because of the e=mcc stuff, which is absolutely wrong of course. > > > > > > Sooner they realise that they have been conned, the better for all. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Arindam Banerjee > > > e=0.5mVVN(N-k) > > > c(V)=c+V > > > and then the whole universe becomes straight, not distorted, and also infinite > > > with infinite possibilities and potentials. > > > > I have to admit, I'm not certain what the source of your discomfort is. > > I thought I had made myself clear. > > > > It may be that you want technology to be able to serve whatever goals > > mankind sets, and that no natural laws should be allowed to stand in the > > way. That is, if conservation of momentum prevents the salvation of > > mankind, in your eyes, then the originator of the conservation of > > momentum is an evil man. > > No. That is not my point. The originator of the law of conservation of > momentum was a very good man. He did his work with mechanical systems. The > law worked very well indeed with mechanical systems. Of that there is no > doubt. > > My point is that electrical systems do not necessarily follow the law of > conservation of momentum. To that end I have performed some original experiments > and I believe that in a genuinely scientific environment these experiments > have to be carefully analysed and repeated. > > As I have often shown, they are to be found in: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s > IFE - 2 Experimental setups > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno > IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws > IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU > IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc > IFE - 6 Spaceship Design > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA > IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY > IFE - 8 New Physics > > My source of discomfort lies in my getting ignored. That causes discomfort. > > Thus the evil lies in ignoring my work. And thus continuing with old ideas > which have their own space, but should not be used to block new findings. > > > > > It may be that you find relativity to be incomprehensible, and anything > > incomprehensible you consider to be evil, a way of suppressing the > > common man. > > No, relativity is not incomprehensible to me and it should not be > incomprehensible to anyone. We should all know that it is based upon a bungle > in the analysis of the MMI experiment which I pointed out in 2005. > > Relativity is simply wrong. To pass of something wrong as right is evil. It is > an evil to which every person on Earth except a few like myself takes part. > > Evil does not do good, so it causes discomfort. In this case it lets frauds > run the roost and they will employ fellow frauds, so the whole system is > corrupt to the core. Knowing this, it is futile to publish in the journals, as > they will reject on dogmatic grounds. Still, video is there, youtube is there, > you are there and I am here, so I published my findings on youtube in a manner > that I believe should convince honest and intelligent minds. > > And that is a cause for discomfort. > > > > It may be that you think that all modern technological marvels like > > quantum tunneling and nuclear power plants are explainable by ordinary > > Newtonian ideas, though you're not quite sure how. > > Nuclear power plants can be explained very well by my equation > e=0.5mVVN(N-k). As are atom bombs. They are based upon extending Newtonian > ideas, with my addition that internal force existence creates and destroys > energy. This formula explains the workings of the universe very elegantly, and > my new ideas in physics are explained in IFE-8. > > So dom't say "I am not quite sure how". My original ideas support Newton > fully - they extend Newtonian ideas into the field of electrodynamics. > > > It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. > > Calling one an anti-Semite (and thus an honorary Nazi) is an old trick and > a give-away. > > It has been applied to me often enough in the past. The last resort, what, after > failing miserably to find the slightest fault in my works, let alone my > character. > > Even if there are no brave and intelligent people to take up my science today, > I do my work in the expectation that this situation cannot last for ever. > > Because true science is for the ages. It will always have appeal to those > seeking truth. They will not be influenced by your smear tactics. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > > > > -- > > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Pay no mind to the Odd Bodkin, he believes telling the Truth is...anti-semitism. In Odd Bodkin's book...if you tell the truth you're an anti-Semite. Actually "anti-Semitism" doesn't exist. It's just an "invention" by Jewish people to suffocate and strangle your free speech whenever you have a criticism about Jewish people in any shape of form or manner. In otherwords, It's okay to criticise everyone in the world *except* "them". But the truth is, "anti-Semitism" does not exist in this world... ..it only exist in the mind of a Jewish person. It doesn't exist anywhere else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 00:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8e63c7ac-61da-4112-a9dc-0fb2c38d0e02@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #637894 |
On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 4:17:05 PM UTC+10, The Starmaker wrote: > Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:06:03 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > On 6/26/17 6:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > Indeed? Truly I don't understand why the public should waste its money > > > > and resources upon unprofitable pursuits that suit the interests of the > > > > Einsteinian liars and thieves, with their worse-than-voodoo mumbo-jumbo > > > > based upon false assumptions and abuse of maths. They are scared because > > > > they think they know that nukes work, and they suppose that it works > > > > because of the e=mcc stuff, which is absolutely wrong of course. > > > > > > > > Sooner they realise that they have been conned, the better for all. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Arindam Banerjee > > > > e=0.5mVVN(N-k) > > > > c(V)=c+V > > > > and then the whole universe becomes straight, not distorted, and also infinite > > > > with infinite possibilities and potentials. > > > > > > I have to admit, I'm not certain what the source of your discomfort is. > > > > I thought I had made myself clear. > > > > > > It may be that you want technology to be able to serve whatever goals > > > mankind sets, and that no natural laws should be allowed to stand in the > > > way. That is, if conservation of momentum prevents the salvation of > > > mankind, in your eyes, then the originator of the conservation of > > > momentum is an evil man. > > > > No. That is not my point. The originator of the law of conservation of > > momentum was a very good man. He did his work with mechanical systems. The > > law worked very well indeed with mechanical systems. Of that there is no > > doubt. > > > > My point is that electrical systems do not necessarily follow the law of > > conservation of momentum. To that end I have performed some original experiments > > and I believe that in a genuinely scientific environment these experiments > > have to be carefully analysed and repeated. > > > > As I have often shown, they are to be found in: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg > > IFE - 1 Ground Experiments > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s > > IFE - 2 Experimental setups > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno > > IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws > > IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU > > IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc > > IFE - 6 Spaceship Design > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA > > IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY > > IFE - 8 New Physics > > > > My source of discomfort lies in my getting ignored. That causes discomfort. > > > > Thus the evil lies in ignoring my work. And thus continuing with old ideas > > which have their own space, but should not be used to block new findings. > > > > > > > > It may be that you find relativity to be incomprehensible, and anything > > > incomprehensible you consider to be evil, a way of suppressing the > > > common man. > > > > No, relativity is not incomprehensible to me and it should not be > > incomprehensible to anyone. We should all know that it is based upon a bungle > > in the analysis of the MMI experiment which I pointed out in 2005. > > > > Relativity is simply wrong. To pass of something wrong as right is evil. It is > > an evil to which every person on Earth except a few like myself takes part. > > > > Evil does not do good, so it causes discomfort. In this case it lets frauds > > run the roost and they will employ fellow frauds, so the whole system is > > corrupt to the core. Knowing this, it is futile to publish in the journals, as > > they will reject on dogmatic grounds. Still, video is there, youtube is there, > > you are there and I am here, so I published my findings on youtube in a manner > > that I believe should convince honest and intelligent minds. > > > > And that is a cause for discomfort. > > > > > > It may be that you think that all modern technological marvels like > > > quantum tunneling and nuclear power plants are explainable by ordinary > > > Newtonian ideas, though you're not quite sure how. > > > > Nuclear power plants can be explained very well by my equation > > e=0.5mVVN(N-k). As are atom bombs. They are based upon extending Newtonian > > ideas, with my addition that internal force existence creates and destroys > > energy. This formula explains the workings of the universe very elegantly, and > > my new ideas in physics are explained in IFE-8. > > > > So dom't say "I am not quite sure how". My original ideas support Newton > > fully - they extend Newtonian ideas into the field of electrodynamics. > > > > > It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. > > > > Calling one an anti-Semite (and thus an honorary Nazi) is an old trick and > > a give-away. > > > > It has been applied to me often enough in the past. The last resort, what, after > > failing miserably to find the slightest fault in my works, let alone my > > character. > > > > Even if there are no brave and intelligent people to take up my science today, > > I do my work in the expectation that this situation cannot last for ever. > > > > Because true science is for the ages. It will always have appeal to those > > seeking truth. They will not be influenced by your smear tactics. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > > > > > -- > > > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > Pay no mind to the Odd Bodkin, he believes telling the Truth is...anti-semitism. > > In Odd Bodkin's book...if you tell the truth you're an anti-Semite. > > > Actually "anti-Semitism" doesn't exist. It's just an "invention" by > Jewish people to suffocate and strangle your free speech whenever you have a criticism about > Jewish people in any shape of form or manner. > > In otherwords, It's okay to criticise everyone in the world *except* "them". > But the truth is, "anti-Semitism" does not exist in this world... > ..it only exist in the mind of a Jewish person. > > It doesn't exist anywhere else. I did not know how I could become an anti-Semite when in fact Semitism is something I know nothing about. Yes I have met many Jews here in Australia after migrating from India and I find them to be very nice people. I get along with them very well, in such important matters as health and finance. Attacking Einstein's wrong ideas is for me improving the scope of physics. It has nothing to do with any religion. Evidently some ignorant and insecure people do not see it this way. They have made relativity into a religion, with Einstein as God or Prophet - in which case their antagonism makes some sense. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 23:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4163533.rnE6jSC6OK@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #637855 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. *punch* “Jewish science” is _not_ a proper, but a *racist*, *Nazi* term. Please inform yourself (the National Geographic “Genius” series is excellent for that purpose), and do not use it like that again. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 20:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5952fd31$0$11722$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #637961 |
On 6/27/2017 5:12 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. > > *punch* > > “Jewish science” is _not_ a proper, but a *racist*, *Nazi* term. Please > inform yourself (the National Geographic “Genius” series is excellent for > that purpose), and do not use it like that again. > Fuck Hitler. Einstein was a Jew so he obviously did Jewish science (unless he did no science at all). See Hanson for more details.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-29 00:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2494420.Y6S9NjorxK@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #637994 |
benj wrote:
> […] Einstein was a Jew so he obviously did Jewish science
> (unless he did no science at all).
“Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I am not yet completely sure about the universe.”
–probably not Einstein
The science that he did had not anything to do with his ancestry or religion
(you probably did not know that there is a difference either).
> See Hanson for more details.
Ah, no, certainly not. It is worse enough that I have to deal with… people
like you here.
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-28 22:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oj1qsf$1ul9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #637994 |
On 6/27/2017 7:49 PM, benj wrote: > On 6/27/2017 5:12 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >>> It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish >>> science. >> >> *punch* >> “Jewish science” is _not_ a proper, but a *racist*, *Nazi* term. Please >> inform yourself (the National Geographic “Genius” series is excellent for >> that purpose), and do not use it like that again. >> > Fuck Hitler. Einstein was a Jew so he obviously did Jewish science > (unless he did no science at all). See Hanson for more details. Hitler was German, Nazi and a Catholic. Did Hitler support Catholic Science ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-28 22:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <595495C3.704D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #638123 |
=?UTF-8?B?U9C10LNnIGlv?= wrote: > > On 6/27/2017 7:49 PM, benj wrote: > > On 6/27/2017 5:12 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > >> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> > >>> It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish > >>> science. > >> > >> *punch* > > >> “Jewish science†is _not_ a proper, but a *racist*, *Nazi* term. Please > >> inform yourself (the National Geographic “Genius†series is excellent for > >> that purpose), and do not use it like that again. > >> > > Fuck Hitler. Einstein was a Jew so he obviously did Jewish science > > (unless he did no science at all). See Hanson for more details. > > Hitler was German, Nazi and a Catholic. > > Did Hitler support Catholic Science ? Catholic is not a race.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-30 14:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59569416$0$10656$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #638123 |
On 6/28/2017 11:06 PM, Sегg io wrote: > On 6/27/2017 7:49 PM, benj wrote: >> On 6/27/2017 5:12 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> >>>> It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish >>>> science. >>> >>> *punch* > >>> “Jewish science” is _not_ a proper, but a *racist*, *Nazi* term. Please >>> inform yourself (the National Geographic “Genius” series is excellent >>> for >>> that purpose), and do not use it like that again. >>> >> Fuck Hitler. Einstein was a Jew so he obviously did Jewish science >> (unless he did no science at all). See Hanson for more details. > > Hitler was German, Nazi and a Catholic. > > Did Hitler support Catholic Science ? I'm pretty sure Hitler only supported "Aryan science". Although oddly I don't think he was an Aryan...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-03 13:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oje292$1al1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #638299 |
On 6/30/2017 1:10 PM, benj wrote: > On 6/28/2017 11:06 PM, Sегg io wrote: >> On 6/27/2017 7:49 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/27/2017 5:12 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> >>>>> It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish >>>>> science. >>>> >>>> *punch* >>>> “Jewish science” is _not_ a proper, but a *racist*, *Nazi* term. >>>> Please >>>> inform yourself (the National Geographic “Genius” series is >>>> excellent for >>>> that purpose), and do not use it like that again. >>>> >>> Fuck Hitler. Einstein was a Jew so he obviously did Jewish science >>> (unless he did no science at all). See Hanson for more details. >> >> Hitler was German, Nazi and a Catholic. >> >> Did Hitler support Catholic Science ? > > I'm pretty sure Hitler only supported "Aryan science". Although oddly I > don't think he was an Aryan... he did seem a little too tan for that. I do have a book on his paintings though, quite rare now, he was a good artist. Not sure if that is "Aryan" either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-28 17:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oj19eq$16u6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #637961 |
On 6/27/17 4:12 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> It may be that you're simply an anti-Semite and don't like Jewish science. > > *punch* > > “Jewish science” is _not_ a proper, but a *racist*, *Nazi* term. Please > inform yourself (the National Geographic “Genius” series is excellent for > that purpose), and do not use it like that again. > I'm well aware of it, and I meant it to see if he felt that way. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web