Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #629899 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-19 21:55 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-05-17 17:29 -0700 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 68 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-19 21:55 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-20 10:45 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-20 13:07 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 13:27 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-04-20 21:09 +0000
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 13:01 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-15 20:27 +0000
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-15 21:36 -0400
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-05-16 05:07 +0000
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-15 13:35 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-05-23 14:40 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-21 14:43 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-21 15:00 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-22 11:29 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-23 22:41 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-29 10:31 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-29 10:36 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-29 11:00 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-30 22:03 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-29 12:15 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-04 23:37 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-05 00:04 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-05 14:07 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist tesla sTinker <truecatholicstaff@truecarpentry.org> - 2017-05-07 17:38 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-08 11:15 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-08 23:24 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-09 23:32 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-13 12:56 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-13 13:02 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-14 12:22 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-14 15:04 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-14 22:50 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-16 10:44 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-17 10:17 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-17 10:29 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-24 11:08 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 11:27 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-24 13:37 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-24 13:49 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-24 17:52 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 11:07 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-20 11:02 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-20 11:15 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-21 14:42 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-21 16:31 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-21 17:45 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-22 15:15 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-22 15:26 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-24 10:43 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-20 11:21 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-20 11:53 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-24 10:41 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-20 11:10 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist TrumpenFuehrer <HeilTrumpenFuehrer@gop.net> - 2017-05-05 21:57 +0000
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2017-04-30 08:13 -0400
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2017-04-30 22:23 +1000
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist Himère Bezuinig <numunenen@wgngiweig.mc> - 2017-04-30 12:24 +0000
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-30 20:56 +0200
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-30 12:34 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2017-04-30 21:39 +0200
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-30 12:58 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-30 22:46 +0200
Tricorder (was: God doesn't believe in atheist) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-30 23:00 +0200
Re: Tricorder (was: God doesn't believe in atheist) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-30 16:24 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-30 16:21 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-04-30 12:41 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:48 -0700
Re: God doesn't believe in atheist "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-17 17:29 -0700
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 12:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <590641FE.514C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #631410 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > > > SteveGG amok-crossposted across 5(!) newsgroups without Followup-To: > > > > > Amazing that some fools still believe in god, creation and all the BS > > > that goes with it ! > > > > Amazing that you still have not learned to post properly. > > > > > If the univwrse had a begining, then what was a day before ? > > > > JFTR: The idea that the (our) universe had a beginning is not limited to > > religion and creationism at all. > > > > There is a lot of observational *scientific* evidence that supports the Big > > Bang theory that concludes, from the general theory of relativity applied to > > our universe, that our universe *had* a beginning. > > > > However, (real) science (cosmology) does not jump to the conclusion that > > therefore our universe was created, which would require it to have (had) a > > creator. For all we know, our universe could have begun from “nothingâ€, > > i.e. quantum fluctuations in empty space could have produced our universe, > > and in fact any other universe. > > > > As a result, the concept of a “day before†the (our) universe began, or more > > generally, a time before the Big Bang, is not well-defined. Time itself > > began with (or, more precisely, shortly after) the Big Bang inasfar as > > that, according to theory, causality breaks down before the Planck epoch. > > > > As another result, there could be an infinite number of universes, our > > universe just being one of them in what has been coined “the multiverseâ€. > > (Hence my emphasis on “ourâ€. Scientific understanding has moved beyond > > the point where we literally mean “universe†as “the only one†as per the > > original Latin.) > > > > See also: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Universe_from_Nothing> p. > > > > > Also, absolutely ridiculous that there is god that oversees everything. > > > > Full ACK. > > > > > It takes hundreds of thousands of years for anything to transverse just > > > one galaxy, including god's thoughts, so god would have to be a very slow > > > thinker ! > > > > Your logic is flawed because a lifeform that we, at our current stage of > > development, would accept as a deity, could have discovered laws of physics > > that we have not discovered yet. Keep in mind: > > > > “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.†> > > > –Clarke’s third law > > > > which can been rephrased as > > > > “Any sufficiently advanced extraterrestrial intelligence is > > indistinguishable from God.†> > > > –Shermer's last law > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws> > > > > However, the existence of such a lifeform grows the more unlikely the more > > we develop our understanding of our universe. > > > > -- > > PointedEars > > > > Twitter: @PointedEars2 > > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. > > The guy with the pointed ears is quoting...science fiction writers!!! THAT'S INSANE!!!! > > British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws > > God had a dream...so he painted his dream. > > He took out his pen and drew a tree. > > Which is worse, quoting from the bible or quoting from a ...science fiction book???? Next, the guy with the pointed ears will be quoting...Star Trek! I wonder which character he'll quote¿ "Set Phasers To Stun" "I'm Givin' Her All She's Got, Captain!" "Highly Illogical..." "Khaaannnn!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 22:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4273153.GXAFRqVoOG@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #631410 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> SteveGG amok-crossposted across 5(!) newsgroups without Followup-To: >> > It takes hundreds of thousands of years for anything to transverse just >> > one galaxy, including god's thoughts, so god would have to be a very >> > slow thinker ! >> >> Your logic is flawed because a lifeform that we, at our current stage of >> development, would accept as a deity, could have discovered laws of >> physics >> that we have not discovered yet. Keep in mind: >> >> âAny sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from >> magic.â >> >> âClarkeâs third law >> >> which can been rephrased as >> >> âAny sufficiently advanced extraterrestrial intelligence is >> indistinguishable from God.â >> >> âShermer's last law Your newsreader is broken. Get a better one. There were properly declared and encoded Unicode characters in my posting, not the character salad that you made out of them. >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws> >> >> However, the existence of such a lifeform grows the more unlikely the >> more we develop our understanding of our universe. > > The guy with the pointed ears is quoting...science fiction writers!!! I have quoted *one* person who was *also* a science-fiction writer: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_C._Clarke> The other, Michael Shermer, “is an American science writer, historian of science, founder of The Skeptics Society, and Editor in Chief of its magazine Skeptic, which is largely devoted to investigating pseudoscientific and supernatural claims.” I understand that he received a B.A. in psychology, and a B.A. and a Ph.D. in the history of science. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Shermer> What degrees have you received, “The Starmaker”? > THAT'S INSANE!!!! No, it is not. Consider, for example, Asimov’s robots, and the ST:TNG android, Data, and compare with current robotics and the beginning of real- life androids. Consider “2001: A Space Odyssey” and compare with the International Space Station. Consider the Star Trek tricorders and compare with real-life smartphones (and, most recently, a working medical instrument that is based on the medical tricorder and has won the Google XPrize). Consider Picard’s desktop mini-computer and compare with my laptop. Consider the Universal Translator and compare with Google Translate. Consider the Impulse drive and the Warp drive and compare with current developments in propulsion like ion thrusters. And so on. Science and technology have informed science-fiction at least as much as science-fiction has inspired scientists and inventors. It is a fallacy to discredit an idea just because it comes from from science-fiction. > British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws You are not paying attention. I have already cited that. > God had a dream...so he painted his dream. > > > He took out his pen and drew a tree. It is a dream … a *pipe* dream of yours and other creationists, who are unable to grasp the wonders of reality. But we know since more than a century now that this is not how it happened. Instead: The tree formed, after billions of years of natural selection, from symbiotic plant cells, which formed first after aminoacids combined to form the DNA (DesoxyriboNucleic Acid) molecules located mostly in their cell nucleus. Aminoacids contain, among other atoms, carbon atoms. Carbon is a chemical element, the nuclei of its atoms which could only be produced by stellar nuclear fusion, i.e. in stars, and were ejected into the interstellar medium when those stars went supernova. Stars formed after interstellar clouds of mostly hydrogen cooled by emitting radiation so that they could collapse in parts under their own gravitation, and the temperature of the collapsing parts of the cloud increased due to increasing gas pressure. Those clouds of hydrogen gas formed from hydrogen atoms and free ions. (All of this we can still *observe* happening in other parts of our universe, so by comparison to religion, it is _not_ just a story.) A hydrogen atom consists of a proton and an electron. And those particles were produced shortly after the Big Bang, about 13.8 billion years, short scale, ago. (We can observe and have observed, over many years, the Cosmic Microwave Background, the afterglow of the Big Bang, which is evidence of the Big Bang. Again, unlike religion, _not_ only a story.) It strikes me as very odd that someone calling themselves “The Starmaker” is blissfully unaware of all of this. > Which is worse, quoting from the bible or quoting from a ...science > fiction book???? It is the validity of the thought, not its source, that matters. Does it give you pleasure to ignore my Followup-To, and to crosspost *again* to *exactly* those newsgroups that I have trimmed from the previous crosspost? Or are you simply unable to choose and handle properly the software that you are using? F'up2 sci.physics.relativity *again*. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 23:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Tricorder (was: God doesn't believe in atheist) |
| Message-ID | <1657434.tdWV9SEqCh@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #631428 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > […] Consider the Star Trek tricorders and compare with real-life > smartphones (and, most recently, a working medical instrument that is > based on the medical tricorder and has won the Google XPrize). Correction: It won the _Qualcomm_ Tricorder _XPRIZE_. <http://tricorder.xprize.org/> F'up2 rec.arts.sf.written -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 16:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Tricorder (was: God doesn't believe in atheist) |
| Message-ID | <5906723C.5E27@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #631432 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > > […] Consider the Star Trek tricorders and compare with real-life > > smartphones (and, most recently, a working medical instrument that is > > based on the medical tricorder and has won the Google XPrize). > > Correction: It won the _Qualcomm_ Tricorder _XPRIZE_. > > <http://tricorder.xprize.org/> > > F'up2 rec.arts.sf.written > > -- > PointedEars > > Twitter: @PointedEars2 > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. What came first, Star Trek or Dick Tracy?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 16:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5906718D.3DC7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #631428 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > >> SteveGG amok-crossposted across 5(!) newsgroups without Followup-To: > >> > It takes hundreds of thousands of years for anything to transverse just > >> > one galaxy, including god's thoughts, so god would have to be a very > >> > slow thinker ! > >> > >> Your logic is flawed because a lifeform that we, at our current stage of > >> development, would accept as a deity, could have discovered laws of > >> physics > >> that we have not discovered yet. Keep in mind: > >> > >> “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from > >> magic.†> >> > >> –Clarke’s third law > >> > >> which can been rephrased as > >> > >> “Any sufficiently advanced extraterrestrial intelligence is > >> indistinguishable from God.†> >> > >> –Shermer's last law > > Your newsreader is broken. Get a better one. There were properly declared > and encoded Unicode characters in my posting, not the character salad that > you made out of them. > > >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws> > >> > >> However, the existence of such a lifeform grows the more unlikely the > >> more we develop our understanding of our universe. > > > > The guy with the pointed ears is quoting...science fiction writers!!! > > I have quoted *one* person who was *also* a science-fiction writer: > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_C._Clarke> > > The other, Michael Shermer, “is an American science writer, historian of > science, founder of The Skeptics Society, and Editor in Chief of its > magazine Skeptic, which is largely devoted to investigating pseudoscientific > and supernatural claims.†I understand that he received a B.A. in > psychology, and a B.A. and a Ph.D. in the history of science. > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Shermer> > > What degrees have you received, “The Starmaker� > > > THAT'S INSANE!!!! > > No, it is not. Consider, for example, Asimov’s robots, and the ST:TNG > android, Data, and compare with current robotics and the beginning of real- > life androids. Consider “2001: A Space Odyssey†and compare with the > International Space Station. Consider the Star Trek tricorders and compare > with real-life smartphones (and, most recently, a working medical instrument > that is based on the medical tricorder and has won the Google XPrize). > Consider Picard’s desktop mini-computer and compare with my laptop. > Consider the Universal Translator and compare with Google Translate. > Consider the Impulse drive and the Warp drive and compare with current > developments in propulsion like ion thrusters. And so on. > > Science and technology have informed science-fiction at least as much as > science-fiction has inspired scientists and inventors. It is a fallacy to > discredit an idea just because it comes from from science-fiction. > > > British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_three_laws > > You are not paying attention. I have already cited that. > > > God had a dream...so he painted his dream. > > > > > > He took out his pen and drew a tree. > > It is a dream … a *pipe* dream of yours and other creationists, who are > unable to grasp the wonders of reality. > > But we know since more than a century now that this is not how it happened. > > Instead: The tree formed, after billions of years of natural selection, from > symbiotic plant cells, What kind of nonsence is this, "What came first, the tree or the plant?" He took out his pen and drew a tree...now where do you think the second tree came from? I've heard of the 'tree of Life', but i never heard the 'plant of life'....give me a break with ypur pointed ear nonsence...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-30 12:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <59063DEE.7DF8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #631351 |
SteveGG wrote: > > Amazing that some fools still believe in god, creation and all the BS > that goes with it ! If the univwrse had a begining, then what was a > day before ? Are you talking about...yesterday, or the day before yesterday??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-17 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d431747d-8d8c-4bd2-af99-83c36c4e682d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #629899 |
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 9:55:32 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > Smiler wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:02:29 -0700, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > ¿ > > > > The non-existent cannot believe in anything. > > > and you know this How? > > > do you mean, before you existed you didn't believe in anything?? > > or after you no longer exist you won't believe in anything??? > > > So, God doesn't believe in atheist because he lives in...a non-existent > place????? Reality is to believe in your God the way "your Mind"tells you.To be told how and what to believe is to be brain washed. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-17 17:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ofipmr$6md$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #633558 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: Reality is to believe in your God the way "your Mind" tells you... . which is apparent from the moment when > <http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> [1] aka SwineBert repeated his Shit and tries to cover up and avoid his explanation of why he became Face-Shitter and a criminal Graveyard Vandal, even as __Glazier's End is just around the corner__ as seen when the Jewish Jailbird Glazier presented himself as the un-American Communist, Bigot, Hatemonger, who does this <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> > to his crowd of "Anon Y Mouse" & 8 other Bert-Shit-Eaters of <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine> who freely & happily laid themselves under Glazier's Sphincter, esp. especially "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> being the most fervent of Glazier's sphincter-lickers, & waits greedily to feast on more of Bert's PFM (Poop For Mouse). > .. but not one "got the picture" why Cohen said & meant: _____ "All of you pigs, 'You must repent' " _____ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkRqQQWu_mA> ever since the schizoid mental cripple, Pervert Face-Shitter, criminal Graveyard vandal, Bigot, Racist, War-monger & Communist :B::ert Glazier introduces himself with/as.... > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert. :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement". :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob. :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > about which .... Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > "Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup." "Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__." "Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!." > "Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street." "Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage." "Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can." > "reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" . "reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.: "reber, you don't believe in science." > Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> "Harlow Campbell" succinctly added & wrote: > "Bert, your opinion doesn't count" "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert" "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker".... "Bert you are senile, dazed & confused" "Bert, you are Fucked in the head. > "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)" "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker". "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking moron who ever came down the Mass Pike." "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?" > "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human fucking being". "Bert you are an idiot." "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet." "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck". > "Bert, you should be arrested" "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your van seems to be a center for drug activity in the Wal-Mart parking lot"... .... .... about which.... > Aviator Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit... Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts. You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself. > Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote: > GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT! Saul Levy > Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote: > I know, you reber are an idiot. Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way. > benj" Ben Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized. But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier, but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is... and promote that shitting into a bucket in a car is an achievement that is a laudable accomplishment... and both being Communists they demand entitlement to goods and services that were created by hardworking people while they themselves drink, party and frolic!... ... still waiting "to be loved by all"... > hanson wrote: So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works, ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year old Minnie Mouse van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier? > "What are they gonna say when Swine Glazier dies? Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man? He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"... <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D] BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans which Glazier, the Full-Swine, announced and posted at the ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal Graveyard Vandal who wrote: > (1) On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in: https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert. > Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which Glazier proudly announced & posted... > (2) On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser. <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which... > Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier threatened... > (3) On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote: Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide". <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> after... > (4) The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel- movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__. who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice legs"... > hanson wrote: Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your legacy, is because: > Glazier the Swine fortunately posted: .... "hanson made me famous".... > hanson wrote So, Glazier you Swine, you should be grateful to me & not wish me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for: > --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising > which is why the mental cripple <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier> badly needs to be administered to with <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> ... > Now Glazier, you filthy Swine, "you will never be loved by all" but incredibly, Glazier, you have a few groupies who love you, and haved become, voluntarily, your personal slaves of you, Faceshitter Glazier, who demonstrate their worship & their devotion to their master Glazier, by lying under & literally shit-eating Glazier's turds: <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> such as: > =1= Sefton "john" <johnsefton288@gmail.com> the delusional vegetarian loud-mouth from Canuckistan's town of Regina is under the influence of his Lysergic- and Solanine contaminated diet and so Sefton lays himself with gusto under Face-shitter Glazier's Sphincter and enjoys eating <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> and Sefton is impressed also with the Hate-mongering of > =2= <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> is Iran's Glazier. The Freak Muslime Mehram Maleki HATES Western culture & the USA, hates Xtians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, even Sunnis. Yet Maldrecki lays himself freely UNDER the Sphincter of Face shitter Jew Glazier who bragged <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> to have _"PFM"_= "Poop For Maleki", which the gay, Iranian Muslime, Maldrecki, consumed until he turned black & posted his <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-Mehram-Selfie> > Then the 88 Year old Glazier announced that "Glazier is a Transvestite who dons female dresses & a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice legs"... which so impressed Maldrecki that Maleki showed his devotion and solidarity by going LGBT & had a Sex change operation, whose result she posted in <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-the-TG-Girl>. > =3= "AA" <double-a3@hush.com> is __Glazier's "Ass Angel"__, aka "Abner Afterduft", the "Alcoholic Addict" who struts with his "AmoebA" brain, posted and yearns to be like Glazier, & AA doubles as Anon Yidd. Mouse", <nobody@home.invalid> who does NOT mind that Full-swine Glazier is a Face shitter & a criminal Grave yard vandal, Glazier who never recanted nor apologized for the overt threats Glazier made.... .... > ...aux contraire, "Yidd Mouse", cum "AA", the Kike, comes to the defense & aid of Full Swine Glazier's criminality, & worse, the Jewish Pig "Anon Yidd Mouse" cum "AA", curses folks that point at Glazier's behavior, which makes Yidd Mouse to be an "AA" example of the lurid "Closeness" which the eminent Jewish Scholar Harold Wallace Rosenthal ||R:|| describes in his epic <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT> wherein it says: ||R:|| We Jews have a solidarity & a closeness to ||R:|| fellow Jews like none other in the world. ||R:|| We Jews are always 'as one' when it counts. > ||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect ||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies. ||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours. ||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows ||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim > =4= Strangely, the Austrian Hitleryouth Halbmutt Wabnigger, <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> sides with Glazier too, but said: ____ "Jews are a residue of failed evolution" _______ > =5= Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>, the "Rectal Vacuumist (Seattle) is a criminal Child-support dead-beat who greedily sucks turds out of Glazier's sphincter, especially when they are Methamphetamine preloaded as seen when Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>::JR:: wrote: ::JR:: I no longer want sex anymore. I masturbate. I've found that ::JR:: all these erections & masturbations can irratate my prostate. ::JR:: My problem mostly happens a few hours before I want to ::JR:: wake up, so I can't take Sudafed. ::JR:: Ejaculation is a mind-altering drug, no better than heroin ::JR:: or meth. So I've recently vowed to not masturbate... ::JR:: I use my left hand to smoke, masturbate and to type ... ::JR:: Does that make me smart ? -- I'd rather masturbate. ::JR:: She likes to squirt meth up her rear ( it makes her cum). ::JR:: but pussy is the last thing I want. ::::::: (cuz Relf is apparently interested now, with his "mouth wide ::::::: open", to let Swine Glazier shit into Relf's "kisser") ::JR:: My dreams, however, have been semi-erotic as of late..." > =6= ... and even earlier, ironically, signed up was kike "Bodaisky", <root@localhost.localdomain> who lied and claimed to be "Bo Dai" from China, but was in fact "Fagie Bodaisky", who lives off the tips he gets from being a rest-room attendant in a NY Bath house for gay Jews. > =7= "Andrew Vecsey" posting as <trudi.schwander@gmail.com> is another stinky & filthy AshkeNAZI, a twatt to boot, who enjoys spending her time under Glazier's Sphincter like the ones above. Like those pigs s/he does NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging to be a Face shitter and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but s/he objects and groans when that is pointed out & comes runnning to defend and side with Full-Swine Glazier, just like seen in =3= & <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT> > > This bizarre perversion is well documented as seen here in: <http://tinyurl.com/magnum-opus-the-rectal-jew> <https://theendofzion.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=jewish+coprophilia> .
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web