Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560938 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-03-13 11:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-03-26 13:50 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 16:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 23:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 17:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-08 13:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-09 15:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-12 14:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-06 14:46 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 23:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Page 12 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57036432.3AD4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #567966 |
Gary Harnagel wrote: > > On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > > > Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? > > Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > i already provided evidence of this "supposed god charater"... Here are the primary colors: https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/971/flashcards/906971/jpg/colorwheel1332981174115.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gle4L58ROCE/UXFqxbF32vI/AAAAAAAAAFM/dUbIf1uLyAU/s1600/primarycolors.gif Notice that there are not one primary colors, but two primary colors. The primary colors are red, blue and green. The other primary colors are red, blue, and yellow. There are two primary colors...right? Not one, two, right? That is evidence of this "supposed god charater"...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <570367EE.482A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568001 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > > > > > Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? > > > Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > > > > i already provided evidence of this "supposed god charater"... > > Here are the primary colors: > > https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/971/flashcards/906971/jpg/colorwheel1332981174115.jpg > > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gle4L58ROCE/UXFqxbF32vI/AAAAAAAAAFM/dUbIf1uLyAU/s1600/primarycolors.gif > > Notice that there are not one primary colors, but two primary colors. > > The primary colors are red, blue and green. > > The other primary colors are red, blue, and yellow. > > There are two primary colors...right? Not one, two, right? > > That is evidence of this "supposed god charater"... In order to understand the evidence of this "supposed god charater"... you first have to understand...Why there are Two primary colors?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5709961C.21AE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #568001 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-6, Smiler wrote: > > > > > > Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? > > > Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > > > > i already provided evidence of this "supposed god charater"... > > Here are the primary colors: > > https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/971/flashcards/906971/jpg/colorwheel1332981174115.jpg > > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gle4L58ROCE/UXFqxbF32vI/AAAAAAAAAFM/dUbIf1uLyAU/s1600/primarycolors.gif > > Notice that there are not one primary colors, but two primary colors. > > The primary colors are red, blue and green. > > The other primary colors are red, blue, and yellow. > > There are two primary colors...right? Not one, two, right? > > That is evidence of this "supposed god charater"... There is a reason Why there are two primary colors. It might be too differcult to understand... even people in the 'scientific community' don't know or understand Why there are Two Primary Colors. Can you describe the color difference between Blue and Red????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vkf7gb12obe3f8shvil8mp5h9ubptikamq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567966 |
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>> >>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>> >>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>> >>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>> >>>Then how can you know? >> >> God told us. > >Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? >Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. Neither are your false beliefs. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne10id$svn$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568028 |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>> >>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>> >>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>> >>>>Then how can you know? >>> >>> God told us. >> >>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>it? What, no evidence? >>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. > > Neither are your false beliefs. What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? > ***** > "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne8on6$7s6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568071 |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: > On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>> >>>>>Then how can you know? >>>> >>>> God told us. >>> >>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>it? > > What, no evidence? > >>>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >> >> Neither are your false beliefs. > > What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? > >> ***** >> "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** Again, asking for evidence, makes the theist run away. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0cvfgb92bu92ovohfd16u3l5usadm1pb8o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568983 |
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: > >> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>> >>>>>>Then how can you know? >>>>> >>>>> God told us. >>>> >>>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>it? >> >> What, no evidence? >> >>>>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>> >>> Neither are your false beliefs. >> >> What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? >> >>> ***** >>> "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>> Pope Paul VI ***** > >Again, asking for evidence, makes the theist run away. Creation, without which there is no existence. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nebjko$1dsa$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569037 |
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Then how can you know? >>>>>> >>>>>> God told us. >>>>> >>>>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>it? >>> >>> What, no evidence? Still no evidence? >>>>>Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>>> >>>> Neither are your false beliefs. >>> >>> What beliefs would they be, liar Earl? No answer, liar earl? >>>> ***** >>>> "Lying about others is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>>> Pope Paul VI ***** >> >>Again, asking for evidence, makes the theist run away. > > Creation, without which there is no existence. Not evidence, merely your stupid unevidenced belief. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kiokgblv4jnltnu3q8cb6oe39juj0jf2ha@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569261 |
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:02:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Then how can you know? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> God told us. >>>>>> >>>>>>Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>>it? >>>> >>>> What, no evidence? > >Still no evidence? Given to you so many times already. If you don't get it, why repeat it? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <333349660481991798.938806ted.smasher-gmail.com@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #569443 |
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:02:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>> What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then how can you know? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> God told us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>>> it? >>>>> >>>>> What, no evidence? >> >> Still no evidence? > > Given to you so many times already. If you don't get it, why repeat it? > Lol. You're such a liar. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nualgbloe000p5fcj95g2n1p0j4hojp07q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569445 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:38:29 +0000 (UTC), Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> wrote: >duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:02:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:00 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:35:57 +0000, Smiler wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:34:03 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:46:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cult. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be the supposed god for which you have no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're moving forward. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What help would I need if I were black? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Then how can you know? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> God told us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is >>>>>>>> it? >>>>>> >>>>>> What, no evidence? >>> >>> Still no evidence? >> >> Given to you so many times already. If you don't get it, why repeat it? >> > >Lol. You're such a liar. :) Obviously you haven't been paying attention, or you're a newbie. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndjmrj$641$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566898 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to >>>>>>>>>>your way of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying >>>>>>>to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>> >>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>> >>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>time? >>> >>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be >>>condemned to hell for it. >>> >>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. > > You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be > judged by God That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > for your support of murdering The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. > the human unborn. They're called foetuses. Do you call your food 'undigested shit'? > ***** > "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dt4rfbl4en3msb7it74a70amg959tuj8pd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566898 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <nv4qfblnb6f9tnf2rfmc60ch8a4h28dh22@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>> >>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>> >>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>time? >>> >>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned >>>to hell for it. >>> >> >>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. > >You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >for your support of murdering the human unborn. > As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s6qtfb1pueel5llf85k8292kv5b43ggvsr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567044 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:17:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><nv4qfblnb6f9tnf2rfmc60ch8a4h28dh22@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>>> >>>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>>> >>>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>>time? >>>> >>>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned >>>>to hell for it. >>>> >>> >>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >> >>You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >>for your support of murdering the human unborn. >> > >As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean >nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. They are not threats. They are promises from God. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <queufb970qfk8slsfshrupv29uvpqpkjda@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567317 |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:32:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <s6qtfb1pueel5llf85k8292kv5b43ggvsr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >>>for your support of murdering the human unborn. >>> >> >>As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean >>nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. > >They are not threats. They are promises from God. Since no one has ever provided any evidence that any god ever existed they are obviously nothing more than the usual empty threats and should be ignored. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-A7934F.04250002042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #567365 |
In article <queufb970qfk8slsfshrupv29uvpqpkjda@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > Since no one has ever provided any evidence that any god ever existed > they are obviously nothing more than the usual empty threats and > should be ignored. Non sequitur. Absence of evidence means absence of evidence. It does not mean nonexistence. However due to the Dunning-Kruger effect you lack the logic to understand how your logic is lacking. You are incapable learning from your error. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9bfvfblu5lanhldlkl764t0vf2ni1nlctb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567409 |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:25:00 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <queufb970qfk8slsfshrupv29uvpqpkjda@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> Since no one has ever provided any evidence that any god ever existed >> they are obviously nothing more than the usual empty threats and >> should be ignored. > >Non sequitur. Absence of evidence means absence of evidence. It does not mean >nonexistence. However due to the Dunning-Kruger effect you lack the logic to >understand how your logic is lacking. You are incapable learning from your error. He started that a long time ago. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ujnvfbl7q0ja07lefag5amrl1fo2p2fv5f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567409 |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:25:00 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-A7934F.04250002042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <queufb970qfk8slsfshrupv29uvpqpkjda@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> Since no one has ever provided any evidence that any god ever existed >> they are obviously nothing more than the usual empty threats and >> should be ignored. > >Non sequitur. Absence of evidence means absence of evidence. It does not mean >nonexistence. However due to the Dunning-Kruger effect you lack the logic to >understand how your logic is lacking. You are incapable learning from your error. No error is involved. No matter how much convoluted 'logic' you may attempt the fact is that the best position in the absence of supporting evidence is that of non-existence. The lack of evidence does not prove non-existence, but the claim of existence with no supporting evidence does zero as far as supporting that existence is concerned. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-22233C.09485502042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #567457 |
In article <ujnvfbl7q0ja07lefag5amrl1fo2p2fv5f@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > No error is involved. No matter how much convoluted 'logic' you may > attempt the fact is that the best position in the absence of > supporting evidence is that of non-existence. Actually, my sad Dunning-Kruger victim, the least convoluted position in the absence of knowledge is to acknowledge the absence of knowledge. Unless you are compelled to make a decision on incomplete information, wisdom dictates defering the decision. You have no wisdom. You leap ahead, pronouncing your truth with no evidence, completely oblivious, even to this point, that you do exactly what Duke does. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bl90gb1if5drs0roi9k6ifb3as73rf6nf8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567498 |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 09:48:55 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-22233C.09485502042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <ujnvfbl7q0ja07lefag5amrl1fo2p2fv5f@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> No error is involved. No matter how much convoluted 'logic' you may >> attempt the fact is that the best position in the absence of >> supporting evidence is that of non-existence. > >Actually, my sad Dunning-Kruger victim, the least convoluted position in the >absence of knowledge is to acknowledge the absence of knowledge. Unless you are >compelled to make a decision on incomplete information, wisdom dictates defering >the decision. When there is a binary situation requiring a certain response using a lack of evidence as a basis for that response makes perfect sense. Certainly more than accepting entirely unsupported statements as having any validity. > You have no wisdom. I have never claimed any. > >You leap ahead, pronouncing your truth with no evidence, completely oblivious, >even to this point, that you do exactly what Duke does. I have never claimed any truth. I simply point out the fallacies in the claims of others and explain why I take certain positions on certain issues. I do not expect you to agree, nor do I care what you do aside from making statements that require support. If you make such statements I may well request the required support. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web