Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560938 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-03-13 11:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-03-26 13:50 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 16:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 23:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 17:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-08 13:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-09 15:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-12 14:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-06 14:46 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 23:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Page 6 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 14 Next page →
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 18:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nebjco$1dsa$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569032 |
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence >>>>> of God. >>>> >>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>> >>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >> >>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. > > We're here, aren't we. Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 08:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2smkgbdakpkjq6n28njunc35qf6cau8bc2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569258 |
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the existence >>>>>> of God. >>>>> >>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>> >>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>> >>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >> >> We're here, aren't we. > >Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 16:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nedu3f$1eng$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569432 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>> >>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>> >>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>>>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>> >>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>> >>> We're here, aren't we. >> >>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. > > If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? Who said that there was nothing, liar? > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 14:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <un9lgbpoam4dgkfeihpkna21ed1c107v5q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569458 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do is >>>>>> suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>> >>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>>> >>>> We're here, aren't we. >>> >>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >> >> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? > >Who said that there was nothing, liar? All the astrophysicists of the world. You're still between a rock and a rock. All they can debate is how God did it as his will. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 23:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neeoum$pnh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569506 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>><snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do >>>>>>> is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>> >>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>>>> >>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>> >>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>> >>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >> >>Who said that there was nothing, liar? > > All the astrophysicists of the world. Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. > You're still between a rock and a rock. That would be the rock from under which you crawled. > All they can debate is how God did it as his will. No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar earl. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 16:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o65ogblv9jfaijv7h63oq534fglqd4auml@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569566 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can do >>>>>>>> is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>> >>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>> >>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>> >>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >> >> All the astrophysicists of the world. > >Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. They all do. You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. >> You're still between a rock and a rock. >That would be the rock from under which you crawled. >> All they can debate is how God did it as his will. >No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar earl. Your problem is to grapple with why they think that God did it. > >> ***** >> "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 19:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <neji3a$ph9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569810 |
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:20:29 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:19:24 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:13:35 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:56:49 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:16 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:04:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:27:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Science is on the verge of almost being able to prove the >>>>>>>>>>> existence of God. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Your stupid assertions are NOT evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You can't hide from the creation of the universe. All you can >>>>>>>>> do is suggest alternatives to the method God used in creation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That would be the supposed creation for which you have no >>>>>>>>evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're here, aren't we. >>>>>> >>>>>>Due to evolution, not a supposed creation. >>>>> >>>>> If there was nothing, how could there be evolution? >>>> >>>>Who said that there was nothing, liar? >>> >>> All the astrophysicists of the world. >> >>Cite one who said there was nothing, liar earl. > > They all do. No cite, your unevidenced assertions are rejected. > You just lack the scientific knowledge to understand. Your lack of scientific understanding is well known, ball-on-a-string boi. >>> You're still between a rock and a rock. >>That would be the rock from under which you crawled. >>> All they can debate is how God did it as his will. > >>No genuine astrophysicist claims your supposed god did anything, liar >>earl. > > Your problem is to grapple with why they think that God did it. More unevideced assertions that can safely be ignored. >>> ***** >>> "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." >>> Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 18:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne112m$svn$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #568023 |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:40:56 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:54:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:19:25 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:46:29 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:30:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:38:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:35:56 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:21:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:22:58 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:16:44 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:03:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>So where is it, liar Earl? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I already gave it to you. But you still don't get it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You have given no evidence that your claimed 'verge' exists, >>>>>>>>>>>>liar. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly right. You're the one that says there is no >>>>>>>>>>> verge, >>>>>>>>>>> so you must see the evidence to declare no verge. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I need no evidence to not believe your stupid unevidenced >>>>>>>>>>claims. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your damnation comes in your inability to support your own >>>>>>>>> beliefs with evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>What beliefs would they be, Earl? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That there is NO God. >>>>>> >>>>>>That isn't my belief, moron. >>>>> >>>>>>I know that there are some claimed gods. As I don't believe in any >>>>>>of them, I remain an atheist. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, that only makes you an agnostic. You can't offer support >>>>> for their being NO God. Hence you are no atheist. >>>> >>>>Only in your demented excuse for a mind. >>> >>> Agnostic smiler - sounds musical. >> >>Like you, it sounds stupid and is a lie. > > Well, you're definitely no atheist. Only in your deluded imagination. > That's an impossibility as there is > exactly zero (0) evidence to support that there is NO God. I don't claim that there are no gods, liar. I just don't believe in any of them. As such, I remain an atheist. > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 15:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-388874.15532324032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #565209 |
In article <nd1b0j$1esp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:16:16 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:20:27 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:01:15 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:49:45 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:02:18 -0500, duke wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:12:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>><snip> > >>>> > >>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your > >>>>>>way of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >>>>> > >>>>> Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > >>>> > >>>>That would be the supposed god and the supposed creation for which you > >>>>have no evidence. > >>> > >>> Waste of time. > >> > >>Yes you are. > >>Strange how you theists run away when the magic word 'evidence' is > >>mentioned, isn't it? > > > > I've given you my evidence for the existence of God. All you've given us is evidence of your complete and total credulity. > You have never given ANY evidence, liar. All you have given are your > unevidenced beliefs. > > > You have NEVER been able to tell me why there is NO God. > > Because I know that some claimed gods exist. > > > You lose, I win. > > Only in your very deluded imagination. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564430 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:02:18 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <91d2fbticnfnemi1ce7fv5lal0gkha1tsa@4ax.com> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 04:12:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:35:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><hot0fbd49homa46mv4kbr7lskhg8jjb0jr@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 23:28:29 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:49:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><h43uebdj0cguak1b6d7k2qkt951mmpj1ph@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:06:55 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:47:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><ktdtebhigcouf67kjb1r6gvcmlsv5tqksm@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:21:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:10:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><vrjqebtdrjmu6k5k4teh4mpj66c43enneo@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:14:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:46:37 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><28qoeblpa1e3g9qp510o3a1pen8quh5l66@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:30:18 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:32:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>><fgqleb11rc9utrrsou7tp97oqt6bunql6u@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:23:13 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:46:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>><evdjebpvou1lrjtqjlr1nq162kt7e8cq8r@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:07:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:00:38 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><qaufeb13a3ukno23m0kaqkt8k3k9dv3nqq@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:42:31 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2016-03-14 2:33 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:57:33 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-03-12 5:38 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:25:34 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-03-10 3:02 PM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:53:01 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-03-05 8:38 AM, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the dukester, American-American >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which tribe is that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which tribe of American? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So which tribe? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So... ...Cherokee? Souix? Hopi? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>American. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The answer is obvious - Idiot American. A vast and far-reaching >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tribe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What tribe are you from? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>None. I don't live on a tribal level of social development. My >>>>>>>>>>>>>>society is far more complex and developed than a mere tribe. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>I'm American. In fact, I'm an American-American. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That doesn't prevent you from being an idiot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>God is real and will judge you at the moment you die basis the way you lived in >>>>>>>>>>>the flesh. Be forewarned. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Why do you keep repeating those empty threats? You know I have no use >>>>>>>>>>at all for your superstition and it means less than nothing to me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I'm not making the threat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Of course you are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Can't. Only God will see to that. >>>>>> >>>>>>You are the one making all the noise. >>>>> >>>>>But I'm only telling you what God said about your future. >>>> >>>>No, you are telling me what your superstition says. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> God is notifying you of your options in eternal >>>>>>>>>judgment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Nonsense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Hey, your funeral. If you think you can get away with it, that's your choice. >>>>> >>>>>>It's your superstition. I think nothing about it. >>>>> >>>>>Yet you will still feel the pain of the flames for your decision to follow the >>>>>diseased path you chose. >>>>> >>>> >>>>According to your superstition, which means nothing to me. >>> >>>No, you're trying to shove your own superstition at me. >>> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast majority. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #565888 |
In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way > >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > > > >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > > > > According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast > majority. I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some kind of divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. Any particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any majority, though often large minorities. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565896 |
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >> > >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >> > >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >> majority. > >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some kind of >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. Any >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any majority, >though often large minorities. True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant variation between two or more particular cults. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-4523F6.13594328032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #566114 |
In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id > <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> > wrote: > > >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way > >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >> > > >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > >> > > >> > >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast > >> majority. > > > >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some > >kind of > >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. > >Any > >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any > >majority, > >though often large minorities. > > True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able > to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant > variation between two or more particular cults. > Every illegal alien is a criminal. > No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > Deportation upon identification as the only option. And to which cult is your allegiance? -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <568jfbhijl93664q92s40uicrodpaa884e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566291 |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:59:43 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >> >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >> >> > >> >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >> >> > >> >> >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >> >> majority. >> > >> >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some >> >kind of >> >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. >> >Any >> >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any >> >majority, >> >though often large minorities. >> >> True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able >> to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant >> variation between two or more particular cults. > >> Every illegal alien is a criminal. >> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. >> Deportation upon identification as the only option. > >And to which cult is your allegiance? The cult of no ability to reason. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-59889A.16571828032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #566306 |
In article <568jfbhijl93664q92s40uicrodpaa884e@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:59:43 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> > wrote: > > >In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly > >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, > >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > > >> >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way > >> >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. > >> >> > > >> >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast > >> >> majority. > >> > > >> >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some > >> >kind of > >> >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire > >> >universe. > >> >Any > >> >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any > >> >majority, > >> >though often large minorities. > >> > >> True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able > >> to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant > >> variation between two or more particular cults. > > > >> Every illegal alien is a criminal. > >> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. > >> Deportation upon identification as the only option. > > > >And to which cult is your allegiance? > > The cult of no ability to reason. So you are in the same cult. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <14llfb1aa0f6j51fo93b4saebh35n0davm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566346 |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:57:18 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <568jfbhijl93664q92s40uicrodpaa884e@4ax.com>, > duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:59:43 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly >> >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >> >> <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, >> >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >> >> >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >> >> >> majority. >> >> > >> >> >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some >> >> >kind of >> >> >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire >> >> >universe. >> >> >Any >> >> >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any >> >> >majority, >> >> >though often large minorities. >> >> >> >> True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able >> >> to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant >> >> variation between two or more particular cults. >> > >> >> Every illegal alien is a criminal. >> >> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. >> >> Deportation upon identification as the only option. >> > >> >And to which cult is your allegiance? >> >> The cult of no ability to reason. > >So you are in the same cult. No, my Roman Catholic faith asks us what we believe. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <l1djfb17e2dthqp9p71uenjpp7hg7mnbql@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566291 |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:59:43 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-4523F6.13594328032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >> >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >> >> > >> >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >> >> > >> >> >> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >> >> majority. >> > >> >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some >> >kind of >> >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. >> >Any >> >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any >> >majority, >> >though often large minorities. >> >> True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able >> to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant >> variation between two or more particular cults. > >> Every illegal alien is a criminal. >> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. >> Deportation upon identification as the only option. > >And to which cult is your allegiance? None. I hold them all on the same level. I have found exactly the same amount of supporting evidence for each of them. Perhaps I should say lack of such evidence. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-39F277.16564228032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #566329 |
In article <l1djfb17e2dthqp9p71uenjpp7hg7mnbql@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > None. I hold them all on the same level. Except your own. It is special. -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bqfkfbp33bo25rftm0vg443a4lg1tr15tl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566345 |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:56:42 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-39F277.16564228032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <l1djfb17e2dthqp9p71uenjpp7hg7mnbql@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> None. I hold them all on the same level. > >Except your own. It is special. What part of 'none' is beyond your understanding? Would my hobby be not collecting stamps? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <97llfbtg66vi1uq02q3iu0an7len2kbmj8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566329 |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:47:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:59:43 -0700, je suis charly ><charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id ><charlie-gordon1492-4523F6.13594328032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >wrote: > >>In article <81phfbp2t90v6tq9219qhb1si33qg8i15e@4ax.com>, >> Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:15:57 -0700, je suis charly >>> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >>> <charlie-gordon1492-B37634.04155727032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >In article <3l5ffbpncofvr6u2ldrekl05h93827cnqn@4ax.com>, >>> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> > >>> >> >>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>> >> >>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>> >> > >>> >> >Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>> >> majority. >>> > >>> >I hate to raise ugly reality here, but the vast majority believe in some >>> >kind of >>> >divinity and its agency in creating this planet if not the entire universe. >>> >Any >>> >particular creation story, even the Big Bang, are not believed by any >>> >majority, >>> >though often large minorities. >>> >>> True, but a huge number of such believers are ready, willing, and able >>> to kill over what to an outsider is a trivial and insignificant >>> variation between two or more particular cults. >> >>> Every illegal alien is a criminal. >>> No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. >>> Deportation upon identification as the only option. >> >>And to which cult is your allegiance? > >None. I hold them all on the same level. >I have found exactly the same amount of supporting evidence for each >of them. Perhaps I should say lack of such evidence. Not my condemnation. It's all your's to bare. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web