Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #560792 > unrolled thread

Re: so-called atheists

Started bywdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr)
First post2016-03-09 11:35 -0500
Last post2016-03-09 22:21 -0800
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: so-called atheists wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-03-09 11:35 -0500
    Re: so-called atheists The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-09 22:21 -0800

#560792 — Re: so-called atheists

Fromwdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr)
Date2016-03-09 11:35 -0500
SubjectRe: so-called atheists
Message-ID<nbpjcu$osf$1@panix2.panix.com>
In article <apipdblaq9d2pfgpqkus369a6e3b942c8c@4ax.com>,
Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> said:

> On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:32:53 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >I mean...
> >
> >How do you go about finding out if an atheist is really an atheist?
> >
> >
> >
> >I mean...if you see an anthiest go to a atheist church...
> >then you can say, "He's going to atheist church, then he must be a fuckin atheist!"

Just a note, Vince: when you're quoting somebody (especially
Starmaker) it's at least okay, and in many peoples' eyes good
practice, to collapse multiple blank lines.

-- wds

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#561053

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-03-09 22:21 -0800
Message-ID<56E1125D.5A5C@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#560792
William December Starr wrote:
> 
> In article <apipdblaq9d2pfgpqkus369a6e3b942c8c@4ax.com>,
> Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> said:
> 
> > On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:32:53 -0800, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I mean...
> > >
> > >How do you go about finding out if an atheist is really an atheist?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >I mean...if you see an anthiest go to a atheist church...
> > >then you can say, "He's going to atheist church, then he must be a fuckin atheist!"
> 
> Just a note, Vince: when you're quoting somebody (especially
> Starmaker) it's at least okay, and in many peoples' eyes good
> practice, to collapse multiple blank lines.
> 
> -- wds


They are not blank lines, thay are called...line breaks. If you collapse
them, you lose the meaning...

but what would you know about English?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web