Re: so-called atheists

From	wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr)
Newsgroups	alt.atheism, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: so-called atheists
Date	2016-03-09 11:35 -0500
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<nbpjcu$osf$1@panix2.panix.com> (permalink)
References	<56D7F674.72D0@ix.netcom.com> <56D9B9BC.7724@ix.netcom.com> <56DCBE25.40E0@ix.netcom.com> <apipdblaq9d2pfgpqkus369a6e3b942c8c@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <apipdblaq9d2pfgpqkus369a6e3b942c8c@4ax.com>,
Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> said:

> On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:32:53 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >I mean...
> >
> >How do you go about finding out if an atheist is really an atheist?
> >
> >
> >
> >I mean...if you see an anthiest go to a atheist church...
> >then you can say, "He's going to atheist church, then he must be a fuckin atheist!"

Just a note, Vince: when you're quoting somebody (especially
Starmaker) it's at least okay, and in many peoples' eyes good
practice, to collapse multiple blank lines.

-- wds

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: so-called atheists wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-03-09 11:35 -0500
  Re: so-called atheists The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-09 22:21 -0800

csiph-web