Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #555135 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-03 11:33 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:23 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 03:38 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 13:42 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-22 08:01 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:29 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-24 10:06 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Neac <gnn.net> - 2016-02-23 22:26 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-25 18:28 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:18 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 08:56 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 07:32 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-20 15:26 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-26 12:50 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 03:42 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:32 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 12:41 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 20:20 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:27 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 20:08 -0800
[OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:15 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 11:04 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:11 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:45 +0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:27 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-03 00:40 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-05 10:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 09:33 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 14:12 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500
Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:27 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 11:15 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 14:10 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 15:43 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 11:46 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 14:41 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 19:54 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:19 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 00:10 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 21:48 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 22:19 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 09:11 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 17:09 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 14:47 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 21:38 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 21:45 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 03:00 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 06:08 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Rock Brentwood <federation2005@netzero.com> - 2016-02-23 17:52 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700
WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-03 23:21 +0100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:47 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0400
Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-03-04 13:44 -0800
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500
Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 04:46 +0100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 13:34 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? sanjeeb guru <guru.sanjeeb@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 22:11 -0800
Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 04:17 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 10:53 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 02:39 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 06:59 -0500
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 04:10 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-01 21:19 -0800
Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:33 +1100
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 13:44 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). |
| Message-ID | <99d3b528-8ea3-4c50-967c-301176bae531@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559128 |
Why has this grown into such a long thread? It was supposed to be just a yes or no question! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <8sygrsji2zs8$.1l0nxewcxkfpp.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #558745 |
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:30:01 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote: > You do realise that formatted text in Usenet marks you out as a crank, > and many people won't go beyond seeing that the text is formatted before > closing the posting? Does posting in form of a rhyme, As I'm wont to do time to time, Constitute crankness, When done in frankness, Or is it a kook paradigm? -- http://mduffy.x10host.com/index.htm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <djq8dpFe11hU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #558812 |
On 3/03/2016 3:56 PM, Mike Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:30:01 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> You do realise that formatted text in Usenet marks you out as a crank, >> and many people won't go beyond seeing that the text is formatted before >> closing the posting? > > Does posting in form of a rhyme, > As I'm wont to do time to time, > Constitute crankness, > When done in frankness, > Or is it a kook paradigm? > No - rhyme marks you as a nut-job - different thing entirely. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <l8uve9yd7uu6$.9z7lza4p9hbb.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #558845 |
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 18:46:01 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote: > No - rhyme marks you as a nut-job - different thing entirely. Your inkling to question my mind, For authoring poems is unkind. If you find taxing, My lyrical waxing, Just keep your responses declined.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 04:46 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. |
| Message-ID | <2182737.jMgU2Y16Hf@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #559076 |
Mike Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 18:46:01 +1100, Sylvia Else wrote: >> No - rhyme marks you as a nut-job - different thing entirely. > > Your inkling to question my mind, > For authoring poems is unkind. > If you find taxing, > My lyrical waxing, > Just keep your responses declined. This excessive crossposting to Usenet is what I just do not get. It’s so easy to set “Followup-To: poster” which seems completely lost on ya as I read those nice lim’ricks in bed. PointedEars, nut-job (according to Sylvia Else, nut-job) -- Q: What did the female magnet say to the male magnet? A: From the back, I found you repulsive, but from the front I find myself very attracted to you. (from: WolframAlpha)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <1q0rcb5kf3t9ua35pkbailkapa71pmpjk9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #556088 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:56:22 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> If you ask people >> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >> You either going to get >> a Yes or No answer. >> >> The answer is either Yes or No. >> >> But...if you ask God the same question.. >> >> His answer would be... >> >> >> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." >> >> God would say, "It's not that black and white..." >> > >Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >not God? > >Sylvia. because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that you will completely understand everything
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dj5kh2F52qqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #556165 |
On 24/02/2016 9:18 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:56:22 +1100, Sylvia Else > <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > >> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> If you ask people >>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>> You either going to get >>> a Yes or No answer. >>> >>> The answer is either Yes or No. >>> >>> But...if you ask God the same question.. >>> >>> His answer would be... >>> >>> >>> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." >>> >>> God would say, "It's not that black and white..." >>> >> >> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >> not God? >> >> Sylvia. > > because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that > you will completely understand everything > I haven't said anything about God. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e85ucb9vu4dioq9n4r0agmfjlbftmul93r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #556172 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:03:46 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >On 24/02/2016 9:18 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:56:22 +1100, Sylvia Else >> <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >> >>> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> If you ask people >>>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>>> You either going to get >>>> a Yes or No answer. >>>> >>>> The answer is either Yes or No. >>>> >>>> But...if you ask God the same question.. >>>> >>>> His answer would be... >>>> >>>> >>>> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." >>>> >>>> God would say, "It's not that black and white..." >>>> >>> >>> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >>> not God? >>> >>> Sylvia. >> >> because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that >> you will completely understand everything >> > >I haven't said anything about God. > >Sylvia. since you could not read three lines up let me help >>> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >>> not God? >>> >>> Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <djg7ovFqnhfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #556505 |
On 26/02/2016 1:53 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:03:46 +1100, Sylvia Else > <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > >> On 24/02/2016 9:18 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:56:22 +1100, Sylvia Else >>> <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: >>> >>>> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> If you ask people >>>>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" >>>>> You either going to get >>>>> a Yes or No answer. >>>>> >>>>> The answer is either Yes or No. >>>>> >>>>> But...if you ask God the same question.. >>>>> >>>>> His answer would be... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." >>>>> >>>>> God would say, "It's not that black and white..." >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >>>> not God? >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that >>> you will completely understand everything >>> >> >> I haven't said anything about God. >> >> Sylvia. > > since you could not read three lines up let me help > > >>>> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but >>>> not God? >>>> >>>> Sylvia. > That's not about God, that's about the person imposing the constraint. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 13:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dfcbe37b-64d5-417f-bf08-732ee7032fe8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #557542 |
On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 4:33:40 AM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 26/02/2016 1:53 AM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:03:46 +1100, Sylvia Else > > <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > > > >> On 24/02/2016 9:18 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > >>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:56:22 +1100, Sylvia Else > >>> <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 21/02/2016 10:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> If you ask people > >>>>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?" > >>>>> You either going to get > >>>>> a Yes or No answer. > >>>>> > >>>>> The answer is either Yes or No. > >>>>> > >>>>> But...if you ask God the same question.. > >>>>> > >>>>> His answer would be... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer." > >>>>> > >>>>> God would say, "It's not that black and white..." > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but > >>>> not God? > >>>> > >>>> Sylvia. > >>> > >>> because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that > >>> you will completely understand everything > >>> > >> > >> I haven't said anything about God. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > > > since you could not read three lines up let me help > > > > > >>>> Why are people required to comply with the "yes or no" constraint, but > >>>> not God? > >>>> > >>>> Sylvia. > > > > That's not about God, that's about the person imposing the constraint. > > Sylvia. Why no female God? Is it they bleed? That fits with history.It even fits with todays thinking. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nakan8$3rn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #556165 |
On 2/24/2016 6:18 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that > you will completely understand everything > Are you bullying? :) BTW, are you guys and gals talking about God, or people using the name of God to run organizations? They are two completely different things! -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 21:06:01 up 7 days 21:16 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nalemu$10ru$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #556179 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > On 2/24/2016 6:18 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that >> you will completely understand everything >> >> > Are you bullying? :) > > BTW, are you guys and gals talking about God, or people using the name > of God to run organizations? They are two completely different things! Indeed they are. Unlike god, the organisations exist. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <namlhn$r24$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #556353 |
On 2/25/2016 7:34 AM, Smiler wrote: > > Indeed they are. Unlike god, the organisations exist. > I really suspect many followers of God don't know what they are following.... :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 18:30:01 up 8 days 16:02 0 users load average: 1.14 1.07 1.06 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9g5ucblcusd6573eovtp8i1rcko6hnib71@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #556462 |
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:40:45 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2/25/2016 7:34 AM, Smiler wrote: >> >> Indeed they are. Unlike god, the organisations exist. >> > >I really suspect many followers of God don't know what they are >following.... :) you mean what they are not following
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nap3t8$4sh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #556509 |
On 2/25/2016 10:56 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> I really suspect many followers of God don't know what they are >> following.... :) > > you mean what they are not following > One should always see things from different angles! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 16:54:01 up 9 days 13:01 0 users load average: 1.01 1.04 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ub5ucbtnl1ks6i7o8mcnat48oqgc9m1e18@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #556179 |
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2/24/2016 6:18 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> >> because god is in your imagination only, as soon as you realize that >> you will completely understand everything >> > >Are you bullying? :) > >BTW, are you guys and gals talking about God, or people using the name >of God to run organizations? They are two completely different things! I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that suggest that fairies may be real
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nap3vd$4sh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #556508 |
On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >> >> Are you bullying? :) >> > > I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that > suggest that fairies may be real > Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 16:54:01 up 9 days 13:01 0 users load average: 1.01 1.04 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56D083BD.65FC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #556804 |
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > > On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > >> > >> Are you bullying? :) > >> > > > > I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that > > suggest that fairies may be real > > > > Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) wat about abbott and costello meet the invisible man?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <nasg7l$mk0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #556879 |
On 2/27/2016 12:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > wat about abbott and costello meet the invisible man? > It's better not to ignore potential enemies. :) -- @~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you! /( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64 ^ ^ 23:33:01 up 10 days 14:31 0 users load average: 1.00 1.01 1.05 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sfc1dbhliv2q5hu1tt5usfg6nsdha82iqu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #556804 |
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:59:14 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2/25/2016 10:55 PM, bilgat@m.nu wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:23:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>> >>> Are you bullying? :) >>> >> >> I don't talk about fairies, I only counter and crap that I see that >> suggest that fairies may be real >> > >Gods and Goddesses are different from fairies! :) Nope, not even. They are the exact same thing. they both require the same thing, and that is for an ignorant, usually uneducated, mentally ill, person to believe that fantasy and supernatural are real, if you believe in either of the two you must believe that both exist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web