Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #555135 > unrolled thread

Is there a God, Yes or No?

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
Last post2016-03-03 11:33 +1100
Articles 20 on this page of 117 — 36 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 17:23 -0600
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 03:38 -0500
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 13:42 -0600
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-22 08:01 -0600
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:29 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-24 10:06 +1100
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Neac <gnn.net> - 2016-02-23 22:26 +0000
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-25 18:28 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:18 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 08:56 -0600
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-22 07:32 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-20 15:26 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c> - 2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-26 12:50 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-21 03:42 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 11:32 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 12:41 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-21 20:20 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:27 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 20:08 -0800
                [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:15 +0800
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 11:04 -0800
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-29 23:52 +0000
                    Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:55 +0800
                      Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:11 -0800
                        Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:45 +0800
                          Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:27 -0800
                            Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:34 -0800
                              Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-03 00:40 -0800
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-05 10:38 -0600
                  Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 09:33 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 14:12 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:49 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 06:33 +0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-02-22 09:09 -0500
    Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:27 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 11:15 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 14:10 -0600
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 15:43 -0500
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 11:46 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-02-22 14:41 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 19:54 -0500
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:19 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 00:10 -0500
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 21:48 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 22:19 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 09:11 -0500
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-23 17:09 -0800
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 14:47 -0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 21:38 -0500
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 21:45 -0500
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 03:00 -0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 06:08 -0500
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 03:33 +0000
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-22 20:21 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-23 18:20 +0000
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-02-23 12:43 -0600
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Rock Brentwood <federation2005@netzero.com> - 2016-02-23 17:52 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 12:56 +1100
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-24 00:04 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-02-24 13:12 +0100
          Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:30 +1100
            WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 17:18 -0800
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:18 -0700
                WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
                  Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:36 -0800
                Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-03 23:21 +0100
                  Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 14:47 -0700
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2016-03-02 23:14 -0700
                Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 10:52 -0700
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:45 +1100
              Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2016-03-03 22:29 -0400
                Re: WikiPedia and CraigsList allow Lightweight Markup Language (LML). Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-03-04 13:44 -0800
            Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-02 23:56 -0500
              Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 18:46 +1100
                Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-03-03 19:55 -0500
                  Re: Chritianity's benevolent God is a cheap drug. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 04:46 +0100
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-24 04:18 -0600
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-24 23:03 +1100
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:53 -0600
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 23:33 +1100
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 13:34 -0800
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 21:23 +0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-02-24 23:34 +0000
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 18:40 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:56 -0600
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:58 +0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-25 08:55 -0600
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:59 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 08:56 -0800
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:46 +0800
              Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 12:25 -0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-02-26 23:21 -0600
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:02 -0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 08:07 -0800
                    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-27 10:02 -0800
                Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 23:38 +0800
                  Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 12:00 -0500
                    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:55 +0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? sanjeeb guru <guru.sanjeeb@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 22:11 -0800
    Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 04:17 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 10:53 -0500
        Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 02:39 -0800
          Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 06:59 -0500
            Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 04:10 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 20:14 -0800
    Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-01 21:19 -0800
      Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-03 11:33 +1100

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →


#555135 — Is there a God, Yes or No?

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-02-20 15:14 -0800
SubjectIs there a God, Yes or No?
Message-ID<56C8F352.EAA@ix.netcom.com>
If you ask people
"Is there a God, Yes or No?"
You either going to get
a Yes or No answer.

The answer is either Yes or No.

But...if you ask God the same question..

His answer would be...


"That's a little bit of a hard question to answer."

God would say, "It's not that black and white..."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#555142

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-20 17:23 -0600
Message-ID<gPydnVbKasDGaFXLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#555135
On 2/20/16 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> If you ask people
> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"



   The concept og gods is an invention on man.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555197

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-21 03:38 -0500
Message-ID<cIeyy.43930$GM1.28940@fx35.iad>
In reply to#555142
On 02/20/2016 06:23 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/20/16 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> If you ask people
>> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
>
>
>
>    The concept og gods is an invention on man.

And the way you know this is?  Ah, you've borrowed some "superpowers" 
from HVAC again.

How about acting like you actually know some science and ask Starfaker 
to define exactly what he means by "a God", before you flap your yap 
about it?  Ask HVAC to join the conversation and you'll have a perfect 
trio of ignorance and atheist bluster.


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555286

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-02-21 11:35 -0800
Message-ID<56CA1192.13A5@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#555197
benj wrote:
> 
> On 02/20/2016 06:23 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 2/20/16 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> If you ask people
> >> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
> >
> >
> >
> >    The concept og gods is an invention on man.
> 
> And the way you know this is?  Ah, you've borrowed some "superpowers"
> from HVAC again.
> 
> How about acting like you actually know some science and ask Starfaker
> to define exactly what he means by "a God", before you flap your yap
> about it?  Ask HVAC to join the conversation and you'll have a perfect
> trio of ignorance and atheist bluster.


somethings are known about God...

like for example, He dosesn't play dice.



but, i'm not sure what language He speaks...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555288

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-21 13:42 -0600
Message-ID<9aGdnR15G5GgjlfLnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#555286
On 2/21/16 1:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> somethings are known about God...


   Gods are a figment of human imagination.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555457

FromDavid Staup <dstaup@charter.net>
Date2016-02-22 08:01 -0600
Message-ID<naf45e$pbp$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#555288
On 2/21/2016 1:42 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/21/16 1:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> somethings are known about God...
>
>
>    Gods are a figment of human imagination.
>
>

chuckle
can YOU back that opinion with fact?

a study in a peer reviewed publication perhaps?

I just love watching dumb fucks argue

just 6 numbers

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555649

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-23 06:29 +0800
Message-ID<nag1vg$ibf$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#555457
On 2/22/2016 10:01 PM, David Staup wrote:
>>
>>    Gods are a figment of human imagination.
>>
>
> chuckle
> can YOU back that opinion with fact?
> a study in a peer reviewed publication perhaps?
> I just love watching dumb fucks argue
> just 6 numbers
>

Check archeology artifacts? :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   06:27:01 up 6 days 13:21 0 users load average: 1.00 1.02 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556036

FromHGW <hw@...>
Date2016-02-24 10:06 +1100
Message-ID<naiolv$od9$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#555457
On 23/02/16 01:01, David Staup wrote:
> On 2/21/2016 1:42 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 2/21/16 1:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> somethings are known about God...
>>
>>
>>    Gods are a figment of human imagination.
>>
>>
>
> chuckle
> can YOU back that opinion with fact?

The 'god' concept was cleverly conceived by an exceedingly intelligent 
Neanderthal who recognized the supernatural reason for his dog appearing 
back to front when observed in a mirror.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556027

FromNeac <gnn.net>
Date2016-02-23 22:26 +0000
Message-ID<aM6dnVVai6FtQVHLnZ2dnUU7982dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#555288
Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/21/16 1:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> somethings are known about God...
>
>
>    Gods are a figment of human imagination.
>
>
Only the ones invented by human beings.
N

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556693

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2016-02-25 18:28 -0500
Message-ID<nao2hp$f9t$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#555288

Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/21/16 1:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> somethings are known about God...
>
>
>   Gods are a figment of human imagination.




I am not.
And if you continue to doubt my existance,.....I shall have you 
smited,.....very wrathfully 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555464

Fromjay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com>
Date2016-02-22 06:18 -0800
Message-ID<5a40b936-7748-413d-b5c7-c628be7738b5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#555142
Sam...
>> On 2/20/16 5:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > If you ask people > "Is there a God, Yes or No?"

>The concept og gods is an invention on man.

Sort of like relativity is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555480

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-22 08:56 -0600
Message-ID<au6dnUku4pAtvFbLnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#555464
On 2/22/16 8:18 AM, jay moseley wrote:
> Sam...
>>
>> The concept of gods is an invention on man.

>
> Sort of like relativity is.
>

   Actually predictions of relativity are testable, making it science.
   Too bad you confused the two.




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555494

Fromjay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com>
Date2016-02-22 07:32 -0800
Message-ID<93bca2f3-3e4f-460d-9e73-b7f9474fb226@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#555480
Sam..
>> On 2/22/16 8:18 AM, jay moseley wrote:
>>> Sam... >> >> The concept of gods is an invention on man.

>>Sort of like relativity is. 

>Actually predictions of relativity are testable, making it science. Too bad you confused the two.

Let me see..SR predicts that light speed cannot be constant, isotropically
in a rotating frame. 
Yet MMX which rotates around the earths axis once a day has light speed
constant in all directions. 
Looks like SR failed that test.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555145

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2016-02-20 15:26 -0800
Message-ID<08f404b2-582e-4317-8fb3-3f255b1183f7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#555135
On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 3:14:30 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> If you ask people
> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
> You either going to get
> a Yes or No answer.
> 
> The answer is either Yes or No.
> 
> But...if you ask God the same question..
> 
> His answer would be...
> 
> 
> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer."
> 
> God would say, "It's not that black and white..."


You speak for God?

Are you a prophet?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555160

From"Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c>
Date2016-02-21 00:47 +0000
Message-ID<967mvl.bi.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#555135
The Starmaker wrote:


> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"

Most emphatically, YES! We call Him the Flying Spaghetti Monster*, and
you can read about Him here:

http://www.venganza.org/

*Don't let the word "monster" scare you. The FSM is basically a nice
guy, unlike the god described by the Christian bible, who doesn't exist
anyway.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555161

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-02-20 17:04 -0800
Message-ID<56C90D2F.3C7F@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#555160
Ted&Alice Street wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
> 
> Most emphatically, YES! We call Him the Flying Spaghetti Monster*, and
> you can read about Him here:
> 
> http://www.venganza.org/
> 
> *Don't let the word "monster" scare you. The FSM is basically a nice
> guy, unlike the god described by the Christian bible, who doesn't exist
> anyway.



the Flying Spaghetti Monster couldn't possibly be God...I don't think
Italian is God's language.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555232

From"Ted&Alice Street" <sam.tedesco@notgmail.c>
Date2016-02-21 12:38 +0000
Message-ID<9690lo.66s.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#555161
The Starmaker wrote:

> Ted&Alice Street wrote:
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > > "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
> > 
> > Most emphatically, YES! We call Him the Flying Spaghetti Monster*,
> > and you can read about Him here:
> > 
> > http://www.venganza.org/
> > 
> > *Don't let the word "monster" scare you. The FSM is basically a nice
> > guy, unlike the god described by the Christian bible, who doesn't
> > exist anyway.
> 
> 
> 
> the Flying Spaghetti Monster couldn't possibly be God...I don't think
> Italian is God's language.

Better let the Pope know that then.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555174

From"Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com>
Date2016-02-20 18:45 -0800
Message-ID<nab8cu$1s37$1@adenine.netfront.net>
In reply to#555135
"The Starmaker"  wrote

> If you ask people
> "Is there a God, Yes or No?"
> You either going to get
> a Yes or No answer.
>
> The answer is either Yes or No.
>
> But...if you ask God the same question..
>
> His answer would be...
>
>
> "That's a little bit of a hard question to answer."
>
> God would say, "It's not that black and white..."

Read the Old Testament. Yahweh (or Jehovah) appeared in a burning bush and 
proclaimed "I am what I am". (Popeye said the same.) If you know theology, 
you know that one statement is the basis of monotheism in Judaism, 
Christianity and Islam and the Bahá'í Faith.

Preceding religions all believed in polytheism.

QUESTION: Why did pose a proposition about God and not gods?Are you some 
kind of religious bigot trying to stir up trouble?




--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555178

From"Norm X" <nobody@nowhere.com>
Date2016-02-20 19:13 -0800
Message-ID<naba12$1v14$1@adenine.netfront.net>
In reply to#555135
"The Starmaker"  wrote

> God would say, "It's not that black and white..."

Nonsense begets nonsense (GIGO). Descarte wrote "dubito ergo cogito ergo 
sum", meaning I doubt, therefor I think, therefor I am. God or the gods are 
not on drugs or stupid. He/she/it or they, would agree with  Descarte. 
Descarte is consistent with "I am what I am". Wise people (God/gods) do not 
suffer fools like you. If you think you have been talking to God or speak 
for God (he/she or it), you are on drugs or stupid.

Get help soon.

Medieval logic and Theology is a wonderful thing. Study hard. 



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555182

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-02-20 20:28 -0800
Message-ID<56C93CF3.12C0@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#555178
Norm X wrote:
> 
> "The Starmaker"  wrote
> 
> > God would say, "It's not that black and white..."
> 
> Nonsense begets nonsense (GIGO). Descarte wrote "dubito ergo cogito ergo
> sum", meaning I doubt, therefor I think, therefor I am. God or the gods are
> not on drugs or stupid. He/she/it or they, would agree with  Descarte.
> Descarte is consistent with "I am what I am". Wise people (God/gods) do not
> suffer fools like you. If you think you have been talking to God or speak
> for God (he/she or it), you are on drugs or stupid.
> 
> Get help soon.
> 
> Medieval logic and Theology is a wonderful thing. Study hard.
> 


Descarte's quote "I think, therefor I am." is a stupid quote.


"I think" is the brain part of the physical body....What is "I am"???? No relationship to 'I think'.


There is no "I am".


It's an illusion.


Please stop quoting stupid old tyme quotes that are in error.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web