Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #554676 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-19 12:02 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800 |
| Articles | 3 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:02 -0800
Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 12:02 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity |
| Message-ID | <56C774D2.4AFE@ix.netcom.com> |
mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote: > > Spocks...@gmail.com > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. really, i didn't know that.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C80D20.3BFD@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #554676 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Spocks...@gmail.com > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. > > really, i didn't know that. I'm not sure what "fall" means... i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56C811A5.35C4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #554854 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > Spocks...@gmail.com > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. > > > > really, i didn't know that. > > I'm not sure what "fall" means... > > i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right? i mean...if you quickly grab the earth away before the ball hits the earth ground, the ball keeps going. It's not falling.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web