Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #433667
| Message-ID | <56C811A5.35C4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity |
| References | <2ecfb42a-7db8-4b69-ba34-ae1d7b346aa8@googlegroups.com> <a50c8b63-7871-4f39-941d-f09d7c7553e7@googlegroups.com> <56C774D2.4AFE@ix.netcom.com> <56C80D20.3BFD@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > Spocks...@gmail.com > > > In Tesla's gravitational theory gravity is a secondary force, Newton's apple does not fall to the ground because of the downward force of gravity but because of the upward momentum of EMR or light. Gravity is not a real force at all. Objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. > > > > really, i didn't know that. > > I'm not sure what "fall" means... > > i mean...if it is not at rest then it's...coasting, not falling, right? i mean...if you quickly grab the earth away before the ball hits the earth ground, the ball keeps going. It's not falling.
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:02 -0800
Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 22:52 -0800
Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:11 -0800
Re: Teslas Theory of Gravity "C. E. Gee" <thelastearthman@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:14 -0800
csiph-web