Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #553600 > unrolled thread

GRAVITY...

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
              Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-16 16:10 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:25 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 16:39 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:57 -0600
                  Re: GRAVITY... "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 21:11 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
            /alfven, J. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:15 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
              gra-something noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 20:06 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                  Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                    Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                      Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                        Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                      Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 21:48 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000
          Re: GRAVITY... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 04:27 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#554138 — gra-something

see the bOOk by a student of Alfven,
_the big bang ne'er happenneD;
you only have to ignore the 99.99 that is plasma

>    Einstein's theory of gravitation (general relativity) is even more
>    accurate than Newton's and supported by countless experiments and
>    observations, including GNSS 24/7.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554177 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >
> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> 
> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> 
> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> 
> or
> 
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> 
> Ja or nien?


Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory


(most of these science guys never read a dictionary)

To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.

Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.

In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.


Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.


Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.


They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.


In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.


The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.













The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554185 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On 02/18/2016 02:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
>>>
>>>     You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>>>     therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>>>     into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
>>
>> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
>>
>> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
>>
>> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>>
>> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
>>
>> or
>>
>> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>>
>> Ja or nien?
>
>
> Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>
>
> (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
>
> To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.
>
> Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
>
> In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
>
>
> Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
>
>
> Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
>
>
> They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
> but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.
>
>
> In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.
>
>
> The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.

Starfaker you are the reason Libs flunk every science course they ever 
took. Gravity obviously exists. Unlike you fantasy Lib arts crowd 
science is based on measurements and observations not fantasy. So we 
invite you (as we have invited HVAC who also does not believe in 
gravity) to step off the roof of a multi-story building and report back 
to us the results of your gravity-existence experiment.

The fine point is that one knows what has been measured. But that does 
not "explain" anything. People like PBS and "professor" Wormley like to 
say that Newton explained gravity. No such thing is true. Newton created 
a law that works pretty well to predict what gravitational forces are 
measured and what quantities regulate those forces. There is NO 
explanation of any mechanism or reason why gravity works as it does.
It's pure description.

Einstein improved those predictive laws to cover some more cases with 
increased accuracy, but again there is no "explanation" or mechanism for 
the effect provided. The so-called 'warping" of space-time is not an 
explanation but pure mathematical bullshit.

Nobody (at least in the unclassified world) knows what gravity is or 
what the mechanism behind it is. That is truth. Being able to have a law 
that describes the action of gravity is not an explanation no matter 
what Wormley, Boinker, and HVAC say.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554261 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

benj wrote:
> On 02/18/2016 02:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
>>>>
>>>>     You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>>
>>>>     You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity
>>>> exists. You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>>>>     therefore, gravity exists.
>>>>
>>>>     You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using
>>>>     hydrogen into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>>
>>>>     The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in
>>>> question.
>>>
>>> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
>>>
>>> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
>>>
>>>> an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is
>>>> not known or proven to be true
>>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>>>
>>> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>>>
>>> Ja or nien?
>>
>>
>> Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be
>> true. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>>
>>
>> (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
>>
>> To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>>
>> It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory
>> means; is not known or proven to be true. The theory of Gravity is not 
>> known or proven to be true.
>>
>> Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
>>
>> In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
>>
>>
>> Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
>>
>>
>> Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
>>
>>
>> They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word
>> theory, as if it makes it more true... but it doesn't matter whose
>> theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be
>> true.  In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been
>> proven to be true. The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows 
>> what gravity
>> is...or if it really exist.
>
> Starfaker you are the reason Libs flunk every science course they ever
> took. Gravity obviously exists. Unlike you fantasy Lib arts crowd
> science is based on measurements and observations not fantasy. So we
> invite you (as we have invited HVAC who also does not believe in
> gravity) to step off the roof of a multi-story building and report back
> to us the results of your gravity-existence experiment.
>
> The fine point is that one knows what has been measured. But that does
> not "explain" anything. People like PBS and "professor" Wormley like to
> say that Newton explained gravity. No such thing is true. Newton created
> a law that works pretty well to predict what gravitational forces are
> measured and what quantities regulate those forces. There is NO
> explanation of any mechanism or reason why gravity works as it does.
> It's pure description.
>
> Einstein improved those predictive laws to cover some more cases with
> increased accuracy, but again there is no "explanation" or mechanism for
> the effect provided. The so-called 'warping" of space-time is not an
> explanation but pure mathematical bullshit.
>
> Nobody (at least in the unclassified world) knows what gravity is or
> what the mechanism behind it is. That is truth. Being able to have a law
> that describes the action of gravity is not an explanation no matter
> what Wormley, Boinker, and HVAC say.






How can you argue with logic like that ?
BTW,....wind doesn't exist either, because you can't see it, or put it in a 
box. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554324 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

benj wrote:
> 
> On 02/18/2016 02:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >>>
> >>>     You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >>>     therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >>>     into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> >>
> >> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> >>
> >> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> >>
> >> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> >>
> >> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> >>
> >> Ja or nien?
> >
> >
> > Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> >
> >
> > (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
> >
> > To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
> >
> >
> > Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
> >
> >
> > Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
> >
> >
> > They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
> > but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> >
> > In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.
> >
> >
> > The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.
> 
> Starfaker you are the reason Libs flunk every science course they ever
> took. Gravity obviously exists. Unlike you fantasy Lib arts crowd
> science is based on measurements and observations not fantasy. So we
> invite you (as we have invited HVAC who also does not believe in
> gravity) to step off the roof of a multi-story building and report back
> to us the results of your gravity-existence experiment.


Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity
 is true or exist..
all it proves that people fall down.

You can problably come up with a million alternative explanations why things fall down.

I'm not intersted in arguments or explanations for why things fall down...



It reads here: "an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory


You don't like the definition...tough.


The theory of evolution....not proven to be true.



But who in the 'scientific community' is concerned about...truth???




> 
> The fine point is that one knows what has been measured. But that does
> not "explain" anything. People like PBS and "professor" Wormley like to
> say that Newton explained gravity. No such thing is true. Newton created
> a law that works pretty well to predict what gravitational forces are
> measured and what quantities regulate those forces. There is NO
> explanation of any mechanism or reason why gravity works as it does.
> It's pure description.
> 
> Einstein improved those predictive laws to cover some more cases with
> increased accuracy, but again there is no "explanation" or mechanism for
> the effect provided. The so-called 'warping" of space-time is not an
> explanation but pure mathematical bullshit.
> 
> Nobody (at least in the unclassified world) knows what gravity is or
> what the mechanism behind it is. That is truth. Being able to have a law
> that describes the action of gravity is not an explanation no matter
> what Wormley, Boinker, and HVAC say.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554342 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> proves that people fall down.


   What force causes them to fall down?

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554386 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> > proves that people fall down.
> 
>    What force causes them to fall down?
> 


I don't care to speculate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554390 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
>>> proves that people fall down.
>>
>>     What force causes them to fall down?
>>
>
>
> I don't care to speculate.
>

   No problem, the rest of us know.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554461 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> >>> proves that people fall down.
> >>
> >>     What force causes them to fall down?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I don't care to speculate.
> >
> 
>    No problem, the rest of us know.
> 


The rest of yous know 'What force causes them to fall down' is not known, and has not proven to be true.


Unless you can point to a link that states unequivocally that the theory of gravity has been proven to be true...



I'll accept user-edited websites like wiki.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554678 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> > > proves that people fall down.
> >
> >    What force causes them to fall down?
> >
> 
> I don't care to speculate.



but i do suspect the Sun is doing all the leg work...is there
electricity inside the sun?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554864

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >
> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> 
> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> 
> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> 
> or
> 
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> 
> Ja or nien?


Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because...

the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.


Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.


Are there aliens on other planets? No.


Is there water on Mars? No.


Are we alone. Yes.


Is there a God?


You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...



Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555011

On 2/20/16 1:24 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory?



   Gravitation is a fundamental force described mathematically by Sir
   Isaac Newton's Law of Gravitation.

   Einstein's theory of gravitation (general relativity) is even more
   accurate than Newton's and supported by countless experiments and
   observations, including GNSS 24/7.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554149

On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 7:48:53 PM UTC+2, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> 
> 
>    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>    therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.
===========================
poor blockhead  parrot 
the ass of your mother
is curved by space time !!

how much are you paied
for promoting that harm full damage ??
============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#553943

On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist and is true...how can you find gravity waves?


   Gravitation, magnetic field, like electric filed can be static and
   can change and can have ripples.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554249

Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist and is true...how
>> can you find gravity waves?
>
>    Gravitation, magnetic field, like electric filed can be static and
>    can change and can have ripples.

You mean spacetime, not gravity, mister. Gravity is something else, a 
phenomenon, not a medium not a field. You have much to learn in physics.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554890

Sam Wormley

   Gravitation, magnetic field, like electric filed can be static and 
   can change and can have ripples
--------------

Ripple?  AA, this must be for you

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web