Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #551640 > unrolled thread

The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:47 -0600
    Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 12:51 -0800
      Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 15:25 -0800
        Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 15:39 -0800
          Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 16:09 -0800
            Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 16:33 -0800
              Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:40 -0800
                Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 11:15 -0800
                  Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 13:08 -0800
      Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 22:15 -0500
        Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 23:03 -0500

#551640 — The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols

The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0


> Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> astronomer at the University of Nottingham.

> Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#551791

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> 
> > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> 
> > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> 
> --
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.




NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day. 


Read the paper here: 

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm

NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected. 

http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA



Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551876

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> >
> > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> >
> > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> >
> > --
> >
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.
> 
> Read the paper here:
> 
> http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm
> 
> NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected.
> 
> http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA
> 
> Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!


Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet....

i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply
of funds, right?


There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the
supply of funds
using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top
of the planet, NOT
under it.

Or maybe their instruments detect a tree.

Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551882

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > >
> > > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> > >
> > > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> > >
> > > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> >
> > NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.
> >
> > Read the paper here:
> >
> > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm
> >
> > NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected.
> >
> > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA
> >
> > Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!
> 
> Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet....
> 
> i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply
> of funds, right?
> 
> There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the
> supply of funds
> using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top
> of the planet, NOT
> under it.
> 
> Or maybe their instruments detect a tree.
> 
> Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean?

You know how it works, right? They (NASA), gets some stupid woman scientist to say she detected aliens...

whenever NASA wants to hide a fraud, they get one of their women to do it.





This has got to be the most stupiest girl on the planet!
http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/news/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-haven%E2%80%99t-found-aliens-yet



“We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter


"we haven’t been able to look everywhere yet." – Jill Tarter 


Who is "we"? Can she give the names of those guys??? I bet it's top secret..



Anybody else out there cannot define "intelligence"?


Who are yous other "we"?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551885

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> > > >
> > > > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > > > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > > > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> > > >
> > > > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > >
> > > NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.
> > >
> > > Read the paper here:
> > >
> > > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm
> > >
> > > NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected.
> > >
> > > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA
> > >
> > > Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!
> >
> > Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet....
> >
> > i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply
> > of funds, right?
> >
> > There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the
> > supply of funds
> > using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top
> > of the planet, NOT
> > under it.
> >
> > Or maybe their instruments detect a tree.
> >
> > Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean?
> 
> You know how it works, right? They (NASA), gets some stupid woman scientist to say she detected aliens...
> 
> whenever NASA wants to hide a fraud, they get one of their women to do it.
> 
> This has got to be the most stupiest girl on the planet!
> http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/news/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-haven%E2%80%99t-found-aliens-yet
> 
> “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter
> 
> "we haven’t been able to look everywhere yet." – Jill Tarter


Anybody have any idea how long would it take to look...everywhere?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551889

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> > > > >
> > > > > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > > > > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > > > > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > > >
> > > > NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.
> > > >
> > > > Read the paper here:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm
> > > >
> > > > NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA
> > > >
> > > > Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!
> > >
> > > Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet....
> > >
> > > i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply
> > > of funds, right?
> > >
> > > There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the
> > > supply of funds
> > > using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top
> > > of the planet, NOT
> > > under it.
> > >
> > > Or maybe their instruments detect a tree.
> > >
> > > Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean?
> >
> > You know how it works, right? They (NASA), gets some stupid woman scientist to say she detected aliens...
> >
> > whenever NASA wants to hide a fraud, they get one of their women to do it.
> >
> > This has got to be the most stupiest girl on the planet!
> > http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/news/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-haven%E2%80%99t-found-aliens-yet
> >
> > “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter
> >
> > "we haven’t been able to look everywhere yet." – Jill Tarter
> 
> Anybody have any idea how long would it take to look...everywhere?



So, she is quoted as saying:

“When I was a student, there were 9 planets. End of story. 
We wondered if there were other planets – and now we know. It turns out planets are very common.” – Jill Tarter
http://techcrunch.com/2016/02/04/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-havent-found-aliens-yet/#.f2rfwv2:h8Of



So, if I would ask Jill, How many planets are there in our solar system today?

She'll probably respond with if she was an honest person...

"HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSE TO KNOW WITH THESE GUYS AROUND ME???"
"EVERYDAY DAY THEY TELLING ME SOMETHING FUCKIN DIFFERENT!!!"

Then she go on and say...
"THERE'S NO FUCKIN ALIENS OUT THERE, I'M JUST DOING THIS FOR THE MONEY."

Then she'll say..."I WASTED 60 YEARS OF MY LIFE LISTENING TO THESE FUCKIN STUPID PEOPLE!!!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552020

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > > > > > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > > > > > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > > > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read the paper here:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA
> > > > >
> > > > > Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!
> > > >
> > > > Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet....
> > > >
> > > > i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply
> > > > of funds, right?
> > > >
> > > > There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the
> > > > supply of funds
> > > > using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top
> > > > of the planet, NOT
> > > > under it.
> > > >
> > > > Or maybe their instruments detect a tree.
> > > >
> > > > Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean?
> > >
> > > You know how it works, right? They (NASA), gets some stupid woman scientist to say she detected aliens...
> > >
> > > whenever NASA wants to hide a fraud, they get one of their women to do it.
> > >
> > > This has got to be the most stupiest girl on the planet!
> > > http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/news/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-haven%E2%80%99t-found-aliens-yet
> > >
> > > “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter
> > >
> > > "we haven’t been able to look everywhere yet." – Jill Tarter
> >
> > Anybody have any idea how long would it take to look...everywhere?
> 
> So, she is quoted as saying:
> 
> “When I was a student, there were 9 planets. End of story.
> We wondered if there were other planets – and now we know. It turns out planets are very common.” – Jill Tarter
> http://techcrunch.com/2016/02/04/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-havent-found-aliens-yet/#.f2rfwv2:h8Of
> 
> So, if I would ask Jill, How many planets are there in our solar system today?
> 
> She'll probably respond with if she was an honest person...
> 
> "HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSE TO KNOW WITH THESE GUYS AROUND ME???"
> "EVERYDAY DAY THEY TELLING ME SOMETHING FUCKIN DIFFERENT!!!"
> 
> Then she go on and say...
> "THERE'S NO FUCKIN ALIENS OUT THERE, I'M JUST DOING THIS FOR THE MONEY."
> 
> Then she'll say..."I WASTED 60 YEARS OF MY LIFE LISTENING TO THESE FUCKIN STUPID PEOPLE!!!"




So, she has to say: “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter



meaning, “We can’t find intelligence"



And what kind of person uses the word "can't" in their vocalubary????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552311

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > > > > > > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > > > > > > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > > > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > > > > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read the paper here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet....
> > > > >
> > > > > i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply
> > > > > of funds, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the
> > > > > supply of funds
> > > > > using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top
> > > > > of the planet, NOT
> > > > > under it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or maybe their instruments detect a tree.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean?
> > > >
> > > > You know how it works, right? They (NASA), gets some stupid woman scientist to say she detected aliens...
> > > >
> > > > whenever NASA wants to hide a fraud, they get one of their women to do it.
> > > >
> > > > This has got to be the most stupiest girl on the planet!
> > > > http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/news/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-haven%E2%80%99t-found-aliens-yet
> > > >
> > > > “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter
> > > >
> > > > "we haven’t been able to look everywhere yet." – Jill Tarter
> > >
> > > Anybody have any idea how long would it take to look...everywhere?
> >
> > So, she is quoted as saying:
> >
> > “When I was a student, there were 9 planets. End of story.
> > We wondered if there were other planets – and now we know. It turns out planets are very common.” – Jill Tarter
> > http://techcrunch.com/2016/02/04/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-havent-found-aliens-yet/#.f2rfwv2:h8Of
> >
> > So, if I would ask Jill, How many planets are there in our solar system today?
> >
> > She'll probably respond with if she was an honest person...
> >
> > "HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSE TO KNOW WITH THESE GUYS AROUND ME???"
> > "EVERYDAY DAY THEY TELLING ME SOMETHING FUCKIN DIFFERENT!!!"
> >
> > Then she go on and say...
> > "THERE'S NO FUCKIN ALIENS OUT THERE, I'M JUST DOING THIS FOR THE MONEY."
> >
> > Then she'll say..."I WASTED 60 YEARS OF MY LIFE LISTENING TO THESE FUCKIN STUPID PEOPLE!!!"
> 
> So, she has to say: “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter


So, what does the "i" in http://www.seti.org/ stand for??? 



How about the "e"?


How about ...the "t"???? Where is the word for it???

Let me see if I can break this down....


The S seems to mean Search

The E for Extraterrestrial 

The T seems to be miising a word for it...

But the I has to be..Intelligence!


So, what happen to the T word? How do I expalin this to the aliens from outer space??


I don't think there is an Intelligence on Earth that can explain it to me....


(Don't ask Jill, she doesn't even know what Intelligence means!)



Can you imagine Jill Tarter tryin to get money for her SETI program....and
they ask her "What does Intelligence mean?"


Here response will probably be...

"HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSE TO KNOW!!! I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW THE CAN OPENNER WORKS!!!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552352

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols
> > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well
> > > > > > > > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an
> > > > > > > > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > > > > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > > > > > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read the paper here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply
> > > > > > of funds, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the
> > > > > > supply of funds
> > > > > > using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top
> > > > > > of the planet, NOT
> > > > > > under it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or maybe their instruments detect a tree.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean?
> > > > >
> > > > > You know how it works, right? They (NASA), gets some stupid woman scientist to say she detected aliens...
> > > > >
> > > > > whenever NASA wants to hide a fraud, they get one of their women to do it.
> > > > >
> > > > > This has got to be the most stupiest girl on the planet!
> > > > > http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/news/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-haven%E2%80%99t-found-aliens-yet
> > > > >
> > > > > “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter
> > > > >
> > > > > "we haven’t been able to look everywhere yet." – Jill Tarter
> > > >
> > > > Anybody have any idea how long would it take to look...everywhere?
> > >
> > > So, she is quoted as saying:
> > >
> > > “When I was a student, there were 9 planets. End of story.
> > > We wondered if there were other planets – and now we know. It turns out planets are very common.” – Jill Tarter
> > > http://techcrunch.com/2016/02/04/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-havent-found-aliens-yet/#.f2rfwv2:h8Of
> > >
> > > So, if I would ask Jill, How many planets are there in our solar system today?
> > >
> > > She'll probably respond with if she was an honest person...
> > >
> > > "HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSE TO KNOW WITH THESE GUYS AROUND ME???"
> > > "EVERYDAY DAY THEY TELLING ME SOMETHING FUCKIN DIFFERENT!!!"
> > >
> > > Then she go on and say...
> > > "THERE'S NO FUCKIN ALIENS OUT THERE, I'M JUST DOING THIS FOR THE MONEY."
> > >
> > > Then she'll say..."I WASTED 60 YEARS OF MY LIFE LISTENING TO THESE FUCKIN STUPID PEOPLE!!!"
> >
> > So, she has to say: “We can’t define intelligence"  – Jill Tarter
> 
> So, what does the "i" in http://www.seti.org/ stand for???
> 
> How about the "e"?
> 
> How about ...the "t"???? Where is the word for it???
> 
> Let me see if I can break this down....
> 
> The S seems to mean Search
> 
> The E for Extraterrestrial
> 
> The T seems to be miising a word for it...
> 
> But the I has to be..Intelligence!
> 
> So, what happen to the T word? How do I expalin this to the aliens from outer space??
> 
> I don't think there is an Intelligence on Earth that can explain it to me....
> 
> (Don't ask Jill, she doesn't even know what Intelligence means!)
> 
> Can you imagine Jill Tarter tryin to get money for her SETI program....and
> they ask her "What does Intelligence mean?"
> 
> Here response will probably be...
> 
> "HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSE TO KNOW!!! I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW THE CAN OPENNER WORKS!!!"



The truth is...there does not exist aliens from other planets.


I don't know why some persists that there is....probably a lack of understanding how the universe works i suppose.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552431

On 09/02/2016 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day.


Yup, but there is some strong circumstantial evidence. The theory was 
first proposed by one group in 2014, and the calculations were verified 
just a few weeks ago, by a second group.

	Yousuf Khan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#552444

On 02/11/2016 10:15 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists -
>> it remains a theory up to this day.
>
>
> Yup, but there is some strong circumstantial evidence. The theory was
> first proposed by one group in 2014, and the calculations were verified
> just a few weeks ago, by a second group.
>
>      Yousuf Khan
HVAC likes the name "Planet nine". That's good enough for me and should 
be good enough for anyone else here.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web