Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551882
| Message-ID | <56BA78C7.1BD4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 15:39 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols |
| References | <KNidnR0jB61uZiTLnZ2dnUU7-WEAAAAA@giganews.com> <56BA5152.6CE1@ix.netcom.com> <56BA754D.3440@ix.netcom.com> |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > > > The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcJC0a1n1B0 > > > > > > > Evidence suggests that a ninth large planet might be lurking well > > > > beyond Pluto. Discussed here by Professor Mike Merrifield, an > > > > astronomer at the University of Nottingham. > > > > > > > Read the paper about it: http://bit.ly/planet_nine > > > > > > -- > > > > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > > > community, and physics-related social issues. > > > > NASA said that there is no actual proof yet that Planet Nine exists - it remains a theory up to this day. > > > > Read the paper here: > > > > http://www.techtimes.com/articles/129560/20160201/planet-9-in-solar-system-is-still-a-theory-nasa.htm > > > > NASA, but the agency cautions that no planet has yet been detected. > > > > http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/0131/Planet-Nine-conjecture-exciting-but-not-proven-says-NASA > > > > Translation...it's there when We fuckin says it's there! Don't fuck with our territory!! > > Translation: We haven't figured out how to milk it yet.... > > i mean, NASA is only about one thing....to ensure the continuing supply > of funds, right? > > There would have to be something else...some other gimick..to ensure the > supply of funds > using a new 9th planet...like saying there is possibly an ocean on top > of the planet, NOT > under it. > > Or maybe their instruments detect a tree. > > Fuck the water, youknowwhatimean? You know how it works, right? They (NASA), gets some stupid woman scientist to say she detected aliens... whenever NASA wants to hide a fraud, they get one of their women to do it. This has got to be the most stupiest girl on the planet! http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/news/seti-scientist-explains-why-we-haven%E2%80%99t-found-aliens-yet “We can’t define intelligence" – Jill Tarter "we haven’t been able to look everywhere yet." – Jill Tarter Who is "we"? Can she give the names of those guys??? I bet it's top secret.. Anybody else out there cannot define "intelligence"? Who are yous other "we"?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:47 -0600
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 12:51 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 15:25 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 15:39 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 16:09 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-09 16:33 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-10 08:40 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 11:15 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-11 13:08 -0800
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 22:15 -0500
Re: The New Ninth Planet - Sixty Symbols benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 23:03 -0500
csiph-web