Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #539124 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-14 10:48 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-15 18:37 -0600 |
| Articles | 16 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-14 10:48 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 12:50 -0600
Re: The Center of the Universe... gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-14 13:26 -0600
Re: The Center of the Universe... Bill Gill <billnews2@cox.net> - 2015-12-14 20:36 -0600
Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-14 20:02 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:36 -0600
Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 23:02 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:34 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 14:17 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 18:36 -0600
Re: The Center of the Universe... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 18:26 -0600
Re: The Center of the Universe... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 18:00 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 09:34 -0600
Re: The Center of the Universe... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 10:39 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 14:36 -0800
Re: The Center of the Universe... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 18:37 -0600
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 10:48 -0800 |
| Subject | The Center of the Universe... |
| Message-ID | <566F0EE1.FB5@ix.netcom.com> |
If you can Picture It, if you will... the Earth being the center of the universe. then... stars are born and more space is needed all around us to make room for more stars. The Starmaker
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 12:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <m_CdnUr3tYnokvLLnZ2dnUU7-WUAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539124 |
On 12/14/15 12:48 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> stars are born and more space is needed all around us to make room
> for more stars.
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 13:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n4n557$nam$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #539124 |
On 12/14/2015 12:48 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > If you can Picture It, if you will... > the Earth being the center of the universe. > > > then... > > stars are born > > and more space is > > needed all around us > > to make room for > > more stars. > > > The Starmaker > "born" or "birthing" is strictly a human, alien, or animal process. stars "ignite", due to sweeping up, and taking other peoples dirt. They are the trash burners of the universe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Gill <billnews2@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 20:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n4nu6s$v4n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #539124 |
On 12/14/2015 12:48 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > If you can Picture It, if you will... > the Earth being the center of the universe. > > > then... > > stars are born > > and more space is > > needed all around us > > to make room for > > more stars. > > > The Starmaker > Actually the Center of the Universe is here in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. It is on top of the pedestrian bridge across the rail road tracks connecting the Brady Arts District and the Blue Dome District. There is a marker so you can stand there and test it for yourself. Bill
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 20:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <566F90D1.4274@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #539124 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > If you can Picture It, if you will... > the Earth being the center of the universe. > > then... > > stars are born > > and more space is > > needed all around us > > to make room for > > more stars. > > The Starmaker Once scientist believed the only thing that existed was the milky way. Maybe they were right. Maybe...it just grew from there... from the center.. of the universe, the earth. That would mean... the earth is older than the universe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 08:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <CIednalTN83JuO3LnZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539258 |
On 12/14/15 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Once scientist believed the only thing that existed was the milky > way. Hubble and other scientist of his time, using bigger telescopes showed that the Milky Way was just one of many galaxies. And that's not all that they found. > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_tests_exp.html > The Big Bang model was a natural outcome of Einstein's General > Relativity as applied to a homogeneous universe. However, in 1917, > the idea that the universe was expanding was thought to be absurd. So > Einstein invented the cosmological constant as a term in his General > Relativity theory that allowed for a static universe. In 1929, Edwin > Hubble announced that his observations of galaxies outside our own > Milky Way showed that they were systematically moving away from us > with a speed that was proportional to their distance from us. The > more distant the galaxy, the faster it was receding from us. The > universe was expanding after all, just as General Relativity > originally predicted! Hubble observed that the light from a given > galaxy was shifted further toward the red end of the light spectrum > the further that galaxy was from our galaxy. > > The Hubble Constant > Expanding raisin bread loaf moves the raisins apart at different > speeds with greater distance between raisins. The specific form of > Hubble's expansion law is important: the speed of recession is > proportional to distance. Hubble expressed this idea in an equation - > distance/time per megaparsec. A megaparsec is a really big distance > (3.26 million light-years). The expanding raisin bread model at left > illustrates why this proportion law is important. If every portion of > the bread expands by the same amount in a given interval of time, > then the raisins would recede from each other with exactly a Hubble > type expansion law. In a given time interval, a nearby raisin would > move relatively little, but a distant raisin would move relatively > farther - and the same behavior would be seen from any raisin in the > loaf. In other words, the Hubble law is just what one would expect > for a homogeneous expanding universe, as predicted by the Big Bang > theory. Moreover no raisin, or galaxy, occupies a special place in > this universe - unless you get too close to the edge of the loaf > where the analogy breaks down. > > The current WMAP results show the Hubble Constant to be 71.0 ± 2.5 > (km/sec)/Mpc. If the WMAP data is combined with other cosmological > data, the best estimate is 70.4 ± 1.4 (km/sec)/Mpc. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 23:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56710C6B.71FB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #539332 |
Sam Wormley wrote:
>
> On 12/14/15 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Once scientist believed the only thing that existed was the milky
> > way.
>
> Hubble and other scientist of his time, using bigger telescopes showed
> that the Milky Way was just one of many galaxies. And that's not all
> that they found.
I understand, ..you don't know the definition of the word..."Once".
once
w?ns/
adverb
adverb: once
2.
at some time in the past; formerly.
https://www.google.com/#q=define+Once
(why is it i always have to give...English lessons here?)
Strange that the only people who understand English here are the Science Fiction Writers..
(and i never read a sf book.)
(that won't stop me from writing one)
I guess the Science people only wake up when they enter the Science class...
History class must have been boring to them...
This guy Sam Wormley believes History started with a guy named Hubble...
The truth is, these science people have no idea what planet they are on.
Sure they can tell you all about a desolate place called Mars, but have no idea what a girl is on Earth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=80tq0UGdYqo#t=1561
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWt94YoYSgM&spfreload=10
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 15:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5673469D.7E3F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #539547 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > On 12/14/15 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Once scientist believed the only thing that existed was the milky > > > way. > > > > Hubble and other scientist of his time, using bigger telescopes showed > > that the Milky Way was just one of many galaxies. And that's not all > > that they found. > > I understand, ..you don't know the definition of the word..."Once". > > once > w?ns/ > adverb > adverb: once > > > 2. > at some time in the past; formerly. > > https://www.google.com/#q=define+Once > > (why is it i always have to give...English lessons here?) > > Strange that the only people who understand English here are the Science Fiction Writers.. > (and i never read a sf book.) > > (that won't stop me from writing one) > > I guess the Science people only wake up when they enter the Science class... > > History class must have been boring to them... > > This guy Sam Wormley believes History started with a guy named Hubble... > > The truth is, these science people have no idea what planet they are on. > > Sure they can tell you all about a desolate place called Mars, but have no idea what a girl is on Earth. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=80tq0UGdYqo#t=1561 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWt94YoYSgM&spfreload=10 The reason why the majority of people in the 'scientific community' are not good at math is becasue....they hate math!!! This show is all about how much they *don't* know.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWt94YoYSgM&spfreload=10 and they don't know practically everything! They don't even know what to do with a chick... I'll help you guys out...next time you see a girl, tell her.. "I want to feel you up." She'll say, "Excuse me?" That's a signal, put your hand on her breast.. She'll say, "What the fuck do you think you're doin???" That's another signal...that's when you put your other hand on her other breast. By now you should have two hands on her breast... She'll say "WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING PUTTING YOUR HAND ON MY BREAST???" That means she loves it! That's when you tell her, "What are you going to do with your hands?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 14:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56709176.DA7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #539258 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > If you can Picture It, if you will... > > the Earth being the center of the universe. > > > > then... > > > > stars are born > > > > and more space is > > > > needed all around us > > > > to make room for > > > > more stars. > > > > The Starmaker > > Once > scientist believed > the only thing that > existed was > the milky way. > > Maybe they were right. > > Maybe...it just grew from there... > > from the center.. > > of the universe, > > the earth. > > That would mean... > the earth is older > than the universe. I'm sure anyone can find (if they admit the truth) that there are stars in our universe that are older than our universe...planets too! You simply have a lot of the old with the new.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 18:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <t-2dnRyOhsaSL-3LnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539466 |
On 12/15/15 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > I'm sure anyone can find (if they admit the truth) that there are > stars in our universe that are older than our universe. Sorry Charlie -- The aren't an stars older that about 13.4 Gyrs. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 18:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <BO6dnT6CVZAiz-7LnZ2dnUU7-ROdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539466 |
On 12/15/15 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > I'm sure anyone can find (if they admit the truth) that there are > stars in our universe that are older than our universe...planets > too! Sorry Charlie -- The first stars were born about 13.4 Gyrs ago. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-18 18:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8fc942a5-cc16-4577-b53a-bdb7203211d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #539976 |
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 4:26:42 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/15/15 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > I'm sure anyone can find (if they admit the truth) that there are > > stars in our universe that are older than our universe...planets > > too! > > > Sorry Charlie -- The first stars were born about 13.4 Gyrs ago. > > > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. There are rocks older than stars and the reason is they are more stable.Space dust is continually adding to their mass.Plus they hit and fuse.When these rocks get to be as large as Pluto's moons gravity makes them rounder.Few have sharp edges.Mars two moons prove what I say is reality. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-19 09:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MZWdnbrFCZqW5OjLnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #540178 |
On 12/18/15 8:00 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> There are rocks older than stars
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-20 10:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <04e2f3cd-2b2e-4157-a7a2-8eec49651830@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #540178 |
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 6:00:59 PM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 4:26:42 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/15/15 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > I'm sure anyone can find (if they admit the truth) that there are > > > stars in our universe that are older than our universe...planets > > > too! > > > > > > Sorry Charlie -- The first stars were born about 13.4 Gyrs ago. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > > community, and physics-related social issues. > > There are rocks older than stars and the reason is they are more stable.Space dust is continually adding to their mass.Plus they hit and fuse.When these rocks get to be as large as Pluto's moons gravity makes them rounder.Few have sharp edges.Mars two moons prove what I say is reality. TreBert Center of universes are the spot of HUMANKIND Earth is our universe'[s center. Treb has a name for his universe.Why don't we have a name for ours.I thought of a few names that I like. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 14:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c00bf0f9-e95a-42e8-986a-f5f0456cb693@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #539124 |
On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 10:48:05 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > If you can Picture It, if you will... > the Earth being the center of the universe. > > > then... > > stars are born > > and more space is > > needed all around us > > to make room for > > more stars. > > > The Starmaker Its inside a Plack length.Hard to find 22 billionb years later TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-15 18:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <t-2dnR-OhsanL-3LnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539481 |
On 12/15/15 4:36 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Its inside a Plack length.Hard to find 22 billionb years later TreBert
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web