Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #538029 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800 |
| Articles | 15 on this page of 115 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 10:23 -0800
There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 10:51 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 13:04 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:17 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:54 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:57 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-08 19:15 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:27 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 07:20 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 08:56 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-09 15:11 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:38 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:41 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 08:48 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 04:50 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 14:08 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:51 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:54 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 17:00 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:35 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 18:52 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 13:01 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-09 22:15 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 15:35 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 21:55 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 15:59 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 22:13 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 20:35 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-10 15:33 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 01:20 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-10 08:37 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 16:07 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:22 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:13 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 19:47 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 21:51 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 22:06 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 00:04 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:32 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:29 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 22:02 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-11 07:48 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-11 13:54 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:55 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 07:54 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 09:16 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-12 19:47 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-12-13 09:06 +0100
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 07:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 08:53 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:26 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:38 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:40 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:44 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 10:52 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 17:27 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:37 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 18:01 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-09 11:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-10 12:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 11:26 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-10 12:56 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-08 17:42 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-12-09 06:42 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-12-11 22:39 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 19:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-08 22:50 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:09 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 12:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-09 15:46 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 00:01 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:44 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 05:53 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 09:59 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-15 22:44 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 08:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 16:07 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 18:45 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:00 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 15:13 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 18:30 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 17:45 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:47 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 16:40 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-09 12:26 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 18:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 09:52 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-10 16:01 +0000
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2015-12-10 12:03 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-10 13:11 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 15:38 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-11 14:04 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 10:59 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 13:16 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 13:27 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 17:06 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 22:58 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 12:16 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 20:05 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 04:10 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 12:55 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 15:06 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 13:58 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 00:25 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 00:23 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 20:28 -0500
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 09:24 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 09:27 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 11:32 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 10:41 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 12:43 -0600
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:11 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 16:28 -0800
Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 04:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <09f18c35-4a3a-4204-a919-6a9896573489@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538773 |
- show quoted text - The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert ------- Ok then. In simple barmaid terms, explain your 'spin is in' theory. Remember, it's supposed to make sense
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 12:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2bdf7f71-3ec3-44b8-9ec9-4cca4d6937ef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538875 |
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 4:10:34 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote: > - show quoted text - > The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert > ------- > > Ok then. In simple barmaid terms, explain your 'spin is in' theory. > > Remember, it's supposed to make sense HVAC All stuff spins and at different speeds.Spinning creates their wave action.This action we see in electrons,and photons. This is easy thinking.Get the picture and I'll add in my WOBBLE THEORY if you like TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 15:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <jK6dnT4RsYlxQPDLnZ2dnUU7-VEAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #538926 |
On 12/13/15 2:55 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> HVAC All stuff spins and at different speeds.Spinning creates their wave action.This action we see in electrons,and photons. This is easy thinking.Get the picture and I'll add in my WOBBLE THEORY if you like TreBert
## #
## #
#########################################
#########################################
## ######
## ##########
############
##############
#############
#############
##############
#############
##############
#############
##############
############# #
############# #
#########################################
#########################################
#
########
###############
##################
#####################
#### ####
## ##
## ##
## ##
## ###
## ##
#### ####
#####################
##################
###############
########
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 13:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <44cb9e61-2272-4c13-9af3-15273a316385@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538926 |
Obviously I'm not quite at the 'barmaid' level.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 00:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Yosby.32437$NY1.21233@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #538942 |
On 12/13/2015 04:58 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Obviously I'm not quite at the 'barmaid' level.
>
True, but I'll be you've played one on the INTERNET!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-14 00:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ansby.32434$NY1.625@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #538926 |
On 12/13/2015 03:55 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 4:10:34 AM UTC-8, HVAC wrote:
>> - show quoted text -
>> The bar maid first was mentioned by Bohr to show short an easily worded theories were best. I go with Bohr TreBert
>> -------
>>
>> Ok then. In simple barmaid terms, explain your 'spin is in' theory.
>>
>> Remember, it's supposed to make sense
>
> HVAC All stuff spins and at different speeds.Spinning creates their wave action.This action we see in electrons,and photons. This is easy thinking.Get the picture and I'll add in my WOBBLE THEORY if you like TreBert
>
Wait a minute Treeb. What about stuff that spins at the SAME speed?
Forgot about that, didn't you?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-11 20:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jLKay.23922$Qu1.22385@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #538634 |
On 12/11/2015 01:59 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 10:23:08 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>> "There Is No Edge To The Universe".
>>
>> How many times have you heard that?
>>
>> It seems...
>> there is a small group of people..
>> in the 'scientific community'..
>> there is this ..belief or opinion, that
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> They, go as far as telling everyone
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> They will get together
>> and come up with
>> all kinds of explanations,
>> and numbers, to Why and How
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> It's like a mantra.
>> "There is no edge to the universe"
>> "There is no edge to the universe"
>> "There is no edge to the universe"
>>
>> And if you disagree with them...
>> they will have you shot!
>>
>> So, why the mantra?
>>
>> Who discovered that there
>> is no edge to the universe?
>>
>> Did they send Columbus to look??
>>
>> They will have you believe that
>> the universe is infinite. That is just
>> a ploy to have you believe...
>> "There is no edge to the universe".
>>
>> Get it? It's a con!
>>
>>
>> con
>> kän/
>>
>> 1.
>> persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception.
>>
>> noun
>> noun: con; plural noun: cons
>>
>> 1.
>> an instance of deceiving or tricking someone.
>>
>>
>> The Question of course is...what is behind these people
>> from trying to convince everyone that
>> there is no edge to the universe?
>>
>> Why are they trying to deceive you?
>>
>>
>> The truth is, they don't even want you to question it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>> the unchallengeable.
>
> There are an infinite # of universes,and none of them touch.Nor can they ever touch.Treb and I are safe for that reason.Its part of my TIME LAPSE THEORY TreBert
>
Garbage. They all touch at the Omega point. Moron. Goes for Treeb too!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 09:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a2c3e2b4-ade3-4388-99f7-75362e01e475@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #538029 |
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 10:23:08 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > "There Is No Edge To The Universe". > > How many times have you heard that? > > It seems... > there is a small group of people.. > in the 'scientific community'.. > there is this ..belief or opinion, that > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They, go as far as telling everyone > "There is no edge to the universe". > > They will get together > and come up with > all kinds of explanations, > and numbers, to Why and How > "There is no edge to the universe". > > It's like a mantra. > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > "There is no edge to the universe" > > And if you disagree with them... > they will have you shot! > > So, why the mantra? > > Who discovered that there > is no edge to the universe? > > Did they send Columbus to look?? > > They will have you believe that > the universe is infinite. That is just > a ploy to have you believe... > "There is no edge to the universe". > > Get it? It's a con! > > > con > kän/ > > 1. > persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. > > noun > noun: con; plural noun: cons > > 1. > an instance of deceiving or tricking someone. > > > The Question of course is...what is behind these people > from trying to convince everyone that > there is no edge to the universe? > > Why are they trying to deceive you? > > > The truth is, they don't even want you to question it. > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 09:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c524f1c3-e56c-4eab-b71d-15150e1a95a9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #539838 |
It tells me that you're an alcoholic Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 11:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <dLadnfyRXrsrbO_LnZ2dnUU7-LednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539838 |
On 12/17/15 11:24 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert
That tells me you don't appreciate the fact that the universe has no
edge, reber. Try learning from these first two links. Try it!
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 10:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f70564e2-77c1-43eb-8436-8c47c5e7040b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #539842 |
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 9:32:41 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/17/15 11:24 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert > > > That tells me you don't appreciate the fact that the universe has no > edge, reber. Try learning from these first two links. Try it! > > No Center > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Sam I see the universe's edge the same way I see the edge of Earth's atmosphere as it sheds energy,hydrogen into space.Edge is not the best word.How about calling it universe horizon.? Outer surface.Area with least curvature.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 12:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <dLadnfmRXrvTn-7LnZ2dnUU7-LcAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #539861 |
On 12/17/15 12:41 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 9:32:41 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 12/17/15 11:24 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>> Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert
>>
>>
>> That tells me you don't appreciate the fact that the universe has no
>> edge, reber. Try learning from these first two links. Try it!
>>
>> No Center
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
>>
>> Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
>>
>> WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
>> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
>>
>> WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
>> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> community, and physics-related social issues.
>
> Sam I see the universe's edge the same way I see the edge of Earth's atmosphere as it sheds energy,hydrogen into space.Edge is not the best word.How about calling it universe horizon.? Outer surface.Area with least curvature.TreBert
>
No, reber. Read and learn, reber. Read and learn.
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 16:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56734F38.54D6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #539863 |
Sam Wormley wrote: > > On 12/17/15 12:41 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 9:32:41 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> On 12/17/15 11:24 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > >>> Think of the edge of moving steam .Think of being in a fog,and try to think of its edge.That has to tell you something.TreBert > >> > >> > >> That tells me you don't appreciate the fact that the universe has no > >> edge, reber. Try learning from these first two links. Try it! > >> > >> No Center > >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > >> > >> Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > >> > >> WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > >> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > >> > >> WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > >> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > >> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > >> community, and physics-related social issues. > > > > Sam I see the universe's edge the same way I see the edge of Earth's atmosphere as it sheds energy,hydrogen into space.Edge is not the best word.How about calling it universe horizon.? Outer surface.Area with least curvature.TreBert > > > > No, reber. Read and learn, reber. Read and learn. > > No Center > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center. http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts. Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!! http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg Nobody! Why is that? Cause i'm a fuckin genuies! My IQ must be in the trillions...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 16:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5673532F.2DD8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #539971 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center. > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts. > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!! > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > Nobody! > > Why is that? > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies! > > My IQ must be in the trillions... I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo! You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars! it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!! You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang. You have no idea. I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!! I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally. I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors. You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse. There is a reason why I'm... The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-17 22:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5673AE92.23F9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #539977 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > Looks a lot like my photos of the big bang...including a center. > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > at least i have photos....not stupid line drawing from ucla drug addicts. > > > > Nobody, I mean NOBODY has pictures like I do!!! > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > Nobody! > > > > Why is that? > > > > Cause i'm a fuckin genuies! > > > > My IQ must be in the trillions... > > I mean, go ahead...look at those "illustrations" from the drug addicts a ucla.edu > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > Now, look at my photo just what it look like a second after the big bang: > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > This is a photo, a photograph, not an illustration by ucla drug addicts, a photo! > > You can even see a universe *before* the big bang...it has green stars! > > it's a color photograph! No stupid false colors like NASA shows you. REAL COLORS!!! True colors!!!! > > You have no idea what it took me to get a photo a moment after the big bang, and still caputure the Before the big bang. > > You have no idea. > > I'm no UCLA.edu drug addict! I'm a fuckin genius!!! > > I didn't put the green stars there. I didn't put the red shift shooting stars there...that's how it is, naturally! NATUREally. > > I didn't make it green or red, those are the true colors. > > You guys just don't understand..I come from a differet realm of science..it is beyond your uinverse. > > There is a reason why I'm... > > The Starmaker I'll help some of yous out here... If you go to Google then click Images then click the camera icon in the search bar then Paste image URL http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg You will find that Google's algorithm recognizes the image to be in fact....stars. (even though there is no copy elsewhere on the internet that matches exactly...or even close to it.) The Starmaker I'm a starmaker. I specialize in...stars. What you see here is... http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg what the big bang looks like before and after the big bang...I estimate the furst second.. after the big bang...maybe less time than that. Carl Sagan — 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.'
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web